From rmottola at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 16 19:13:29 2024
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:13:29 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
Message-ID: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>

Hi,

I wanted to upgrade the gnustep base package. On Solaris 10, no problem. 
On Solaris 9 I get this failure (old version did compile):

 ????? -MMD -MP -I/opt/csw/GNUstep/include -I/opt/csw/include 
-DGNUSTEP_TARGET_DIR=\".\" -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_CPU=\"sparc\" 
-DGNUSTEP_TARGET_OS=\"solaris2.9\" -DGNUSTEP_IS_FLATTENED=\"yes\" 
-DLIBRARY_COMBO=\"gnu-gnu-gnu\" -DGNUSTEP_BASE_INTERNAL=1 -Wall 
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wcast-align -DGNUSTEP 
-DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_RUNTIME=1 
-DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -fno-strict-aliasing -fexceptions 
-fobjc-exceptions -D_NATIVE_OBJC_EXCEPTIONS -pthread -fpic -fPIC 
-std=gnu99 -Wall -DGSWARN -DGSDIAGNOSE -Wno-import -O2 -pipe 
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcpu=v8 
-fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString -I../Headers -I./. -I. 
-I/home/rmottola/GNUstep/Library/Headers 
-I/opt/csw/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers 
-I/opt/csw/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers -I/opt/csw/GNUstep/include 
-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers 
-I/opt/csw/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers 
-I/opt/csw/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers 
-I/opt/csw/lib/libffi-3.2.1/include -I/opt/csw/include/libxml2 
-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/libxml2 -I/opt/csw/include \
 ?????? -o obj/libgnustep-base.obj/GSTLS.m.o
GSTLS.m: In function '-[GSTLSSession handshake]':
GSTLS.m:1995:24: error: 'GNUTLS_E_PREMATURE_TERMINATION' undeclared 
(first use in this function)
GSTLS.m:1995:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once 
for each function it appears in
<built-in>: At top level:


I think the gnutls version is too old:
 ?? PKGINST:? CSWlibgnutls-dev
 ????? NAME:? libgnutls_dev - Development Files for GNU TLS
 ? CATEGORY:? application
 ????? ARCH:? sparc
 ?? VERSION:? 2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18

versus:
 ?? PKGINST:? CSWlibgnutls-dev
 ????? NAME:? libgnutls_dev - Development Files for GNU TLS
 ? CATEGORY:? application
 ????? ARCH:? sparc
 ?? VERSION:? 3.1.25,REV=2014.06.04


should I try to update or are there known failures/issues? or did you 
just forget to install on the machine?

Riccardo

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 17 09:04:24 2024
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:04:24 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
In-Reply-To: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
References: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

> Am 16.10.2024 um 19:13 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>:
> should I try to update or are there known failures/issues? or did you just forget to install on the machine?

IIRC GNUTLS 3 didn?t build easily on Solaris 9. The unstable9* have already been updated last time
to the latest packages.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From rmottola at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 18 10:58:11 2024
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:58:11 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
In-Reply-To: <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
References: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
 <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <76830690-b7ef-08fd-f3cb-4f886a346b48@opencsw.org>

Hi Dagobert.

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> IIRC GNUTLS 3 didn?t build easily on Solaris 9. The unstable9* have already been updated last time
> to the latest packages.

I tried to to hac on that... I got it partially to build, but fail to 
link.. I was going to ask but noticed I am hacking on an obsolete version.

Shouldn't "mgar up" bring me up-to-date ? To be on the safe side I did a 
"mgar up --all" in the root too.

Current available version should be 3.1.25
https://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWgnutls/

I find however

"gnutls":
NAME = gnutls
VERSION = 2.12.24

with a 3.5 branch inside

"gnutls3"

NAME = gnutls
VERSION = 3.5.18

am I not updating correctly or am I looking in the wrong place?


sorry, but I am a bit rusty on the mgar side, too much macports, which 
is similar enough to be confusing...

Riccardo

From rmottola at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 18 17:30:36 2024
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:30:36 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
In-Reply-To: <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
References: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
 <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <10ea9ef2-15ec-61da-6543-8ca62572c28d@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> IIRC GNUTLS 3 didn?t build easily on Solaris 9. The unstable9* have already been updated last time
> to the latest packages.

ok, small update, i was confused... the last update was mine, but it 
wasn't installed. I got it to build on solaris 10 sparc! but not 9 sparc:

I get this:
copying selected object files to avoid basename conflicts...
 ? CC?????? psk.o
 ? CCLD???? psktool
ld: fatal: file /opt/csw/lib/libopts.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to .libs/psktool
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


what the heck of error is this???

solaris 9 intel built.... so it would really be nice to fix sparc and 
get it out :)

Riccardo


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 21 12:20:23 2024
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:20:23 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
In-Reply-To: <76830690-b7ef-08fd-f3cb-4f886a346b48@opencsw.org>
References: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
 <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
 <76830690-b7ef-08fd-f3cb-4f886a346b48@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <C7E95318-9C08-48C6-A04E-C021CEAF9CC1@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

> Am 18.10.2024 um 10:58 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> IIRC GNUTLS 3 didn?t build easily on Solaris 9. The unstable9* have already been updated last time
>> to the latest packages.
> 
> I tried to to hac on that... I got it partially to build, but fail to link.. I was going to ask but noticed I am hacking on an obsolete version.
> 
> Shouldn't "mgar up" bring me up-to-date ? To be on the safe side I did a "mgar up --all" in the root too.

Thst is just a wrapper around ?svn up?.

> Current available version should be 3.1.25
> https://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWgnutls/
> 
> I find however
> 
> "gnutls":
> NAME = gnutls
> VERSION = 2.12.24
> 
> with a 3.5 branch inside
> 
> "gnutls3"
> 
> NAME = gnutls
> VERSION = 3.5.18
> 
> am I not updating correctly or am I looking in the wrong place?
> 
> sorry, but I am a bit rusty on the mgar side, too much macports, which is similar enough to be confusing...

It looks like the recipe for GNUTLS 3.1.25 is not in GAR:
  https://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWgnutls/
Packages sources is stated as https://chninkel/Makefile which is not part of the GAR tree.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From rmottola at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 22 11:22:31 2024
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:22:31 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
In-Reply-To: <C7E95318-9C08-48C6-A04E-C021CEAF9CC1@opencsw.org>
References: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
 <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
 <76830690-b7ef-08fd-f3cb-4f886a346b48@opencsw.org>
 <C7E95318-9C08-48C6-A04E-C021CEAF9CC1@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <88b9d70d-35a8-1bc0-0dbf-9940981b29a9@opencsw.org>

Hi Dago,

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> sorry, but I am a bit rusty on the mgar side, too much macports, which is similar enough to be confusing...
> It looks like the recipe for GNUTLS 3.1.25 is not in GAR:
>    https://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWgnutls/
> Packages sources is stated ashttps://chninkel/Makefile  which is not part of the GAR tree.

I reconstructed, we started a gnutls3 port years ago, to easy upgrading 
in case of incompatibility, suggested by some of you expert, like 
openssl probably.

I upgraded to a fairly recent version and was able to build on solaris 
10s, solaris 9x but fail to link on solaris 9s... if somebody can give a 
hint, I'd like to test. Wrote a separate email on the thread, did you 
read it?

Strange, usually it is odd 9 intel giving issues, not sparc :)

Building on solaris 10x right now. An GNUTLS update would benefit many 
and security too, I suppose.

Riccardo

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 22 11:23:59 2024
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:23:59 +0200
Subject: upgrade gnutls version for solaris 9
In-Reply-To: <88b9d70d-35a8-1bc0-0dbf-9940981b29a9@opencsw.org>
References: <bd391259-15c4-4319-9203-1f9484054ed0@opencsw.org>
 <6FB4BEED-F1F3-4C85-8574-E61FC1A90EAF@opencsw.org>
 <76830690-b7ef-08fd-f3cb-4f886a346b48@opencsw.org>
 <C7E95318-9C08-48C6-A04E-C021CEAF9CC1@opencsw.org>
 <88b9d70d-35a8-1bc0-0dbf-9940981b29a9@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <0713C6C3-2FDD-47D1-B920-183D4D0A3F20@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

> Am 22.10.2024 um 11:22 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>> sorry, but I am a bit rusty on the mgar side, too much macports, which is similar enough to be confusing...
>> It looks like the recipe for GNUTLS 3.1.25 is not in GAR:
>>   https://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWgnutls/
>> Packages sources is stated ashttps://chninkel/Makefile  which is not part of the GAR tree.
> 
> I reconstructed, we started a gnutls3 port years ago, to easy upgrading in case of incompatibility, suggested by some of you expert, like openssl probably.
> 
> I upgraded to a fairly recent version and was able to build on solaris 10s, solaris 9x but fail to link on solaris 9s... if somebody can give a hint, I'd like to test. Wrote a separate email on the thread, did you read it?
> 
> Strange, usually it is odd 9 intel giving issues, not sparc :)

Please commit what you have and tell me the path in the SVN repo and I?ll try to reproduce
and take a look.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From rmottola at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 22 12:34:11 2024
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:34:11 +0200
Subject: gnutls 3.5.19 on solaris sparc v9
Message-ID: <db7d3113-ade5-0fd1-496a-67d49c3b55ad@opencsw.org>

Hi,

I separate the thread. As written, I was able to build more modern 
3.5.19 on solaris 9 intel, solaris 10 sparc&intel. It fails on Sparc 
solaris 9.

Failure I see is at link stage:
gmake[3]: Entering directory 
`/home/rmottola/opencsw/gnutls3/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv9/gnutls-3.5.19/src'
gmake[4]: Entering directory 
`/home/rmottola/opencsw/gnutls3/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv9/gnutls-3.5.19/src'
 ? CCLD???? psktool
ld: fatal: file /opt/csw/lib/libopts.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to .libs/psktool
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[4]: *** [psktool] Error 1


file? /opt/csw/lib/libopts.so
/opt/csw/lib/libopts.so:??????? ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 
1, dynamically linked, not stripped


It appears to be a linker error. sparcv9 is being built, libobts.so is 
"sparc version1" so classic 32bit...? is it mixing something up? Perhaps 
libopts is missing its v9 version?

Riccardo