From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 12 11:50:26 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:50:26 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libcares, libcares_devel Message-ID: <201002121050.o1CAoL0V027592@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * libcares: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.10 - to: 2010.02.12 + libcares-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcares-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcares_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcares_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Previous package had broken 64 bit includes -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 12 17:55:01 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:55:01 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs alternatives Message-ID: <201002121654.o1CGsvZX027068@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: alternatives + alternatives-1.3.30c,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + alternatives-1.3.30c,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From ihsan at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 14:39:02 2010 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:39:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] test Message-ID: <4B77FCF6.30508@opencsw.org> please ignore -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 15:46:40 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:46:40 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cupsd, fontforge, gnupg2, gnupg_agent, mysql5rt, pinentry, py_cheetah, py_curl, py_hachoir_core, py_hachoir_parser, py_suds, py_yaml, py_yaml_rt, pychecker, pysqlite2, shflags, slack, tree Message-ID: <201002141446.o1EEkbkU022043@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * cupsd: revision upgrade * Fixes a problem: http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4168 - from: 2009.11.12 - to: 2010.01.25 + cupsd-1.4.2,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + cupsd-1.4.2,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: gnupg_agent * Separated from gnupg2, can be used with gpg 1.x + gnupg_agent-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + gnupg_agent-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * gnupg2: patchlevel upgrade * Removes the agent - from: 2.0.10,REV=2009.04.02 - to: 2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12 + gnupg2-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + gnupg2-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: py_suds * Requested by skayser + py_suds-0.3.8,REV=2010.02.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * py_cheetah: revision upgrade * Removes CSwpython-rt dependency - from: 2009.12.15 - to: 2010.01.31 + py_cheetah-2.4.0,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_cheetah-2.4.0,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: shflags * A shell port of google-glflags + shflags-1.0.3,REV=2010.02.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: py_curl * A user on IRC asked about it, had trouble building it + py_curl-7.19.0,REV=2010.01.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_curl-7.19.0,REV=2010.01.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * fontforge: revision upgrade * Removes unnecessary dependencies - from: 2009.12.14 - to: 2010.01.31 + fontforge-0.20090923,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + fontforge-0.20090923,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * py_yaml: revision upgrade * Removes CSwpython-rt dependency - from: 2009.11.13 - to: 2010.01.31 + py_yaml-3.09,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + py_yaml_rt-3.09,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_yaml_rt-3.09,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: slack * A simple configuration management tool + slack-0.15.2,REV=2010.02.04-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * pysqlite2: patchlevel upgrade * Removes CSwpython-rt dependency - from: 2.5.5,REV=2009.06.05 - to: 2.5.6,REV=2010.02.05 + pysqlite2-2.5.6,REV=2010.02.05-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pysqlite2-2.5.6,REV=2010.02.05-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * pinentry: revision upgrade * Removes unnecessary dependencies - from: 2009.12.06 - to: 2010.01.28 + pinentry-0.7.6,REV=2010.01.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pinentry-0.7.6,REV=2010.01.28-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: py_hachoir * Binary files parser + py_hachoir_core-1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + py_hachoir_parser-1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * tree: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.5.2.2,REV=2009.09.04 - to: 1.5.3,REV=2010.02.02 + tree-1.5.3,REV=2010.02.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + tree-1.5.3,REV=2010.02.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * mysql5rt: revision upgrade * A workaround for linking problems: http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4149 - from: 2010.01.08 - to: 2010.02.08 + mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: pychecker * Static analysis of Python code + pychecker-0.8.18,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz (Testing the pkgsubmissions mailing list.) -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 15 11:29:36 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:29:36 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel, curl_rt Message-ID: <201002151029.o1FATWih020619@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * curl: minor version upgrade - from: 7.19.7,REV=2010.01.15 - to: 7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15 + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Now with additionaly dependency to libcares. -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon Feb 15 14:46:43 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:46:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (unstable) bind, dhcp, dnstop, memconf, postgrey, spamassassin Message-ID: <625385e31002150546l4aaa8a5an643c3aa575fe9b1b@mail.gmail.com> bind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz bind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz bind_chroot-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz bind_devel-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz bind_utils-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz bind_utils-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz dhcp-4.1.1,REV=2010.01.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz dhcp-4.1.1,REV=2010.01.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz dhcp_devel-4.1.1,REV=2010.01.19-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libbind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libbind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz memconf-2.13,REV=2010.01.18-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz postgrey-1.32,REV=2010.02.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz spamassassin-3.3.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz spamassassin-3.3.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 15 15:24:57 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:24:57 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_paramsvalidate Message-ID: <201002151424.o1FEOrQv022629@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: pm_paramsvalidate + pm_paramsvalidate-0.94,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_paramsvalidate-0.94,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 15 17:29:53 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:29:53 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib Message-ID: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * plib: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.8.4 - to: 1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15 + plib-1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + plib-1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 15 17:37:31 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:37:31 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libssh2, libssh2_devel Message-ID: <201002151637.o1FGbRGD024572@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * libssh2: minor version upgrade - from: 1.1,REV=2009.04.02 - to: 1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15 + libssh2-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libssh2-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: libssh2_devel + libssh2_devel-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libssh2_devel-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 01:27:20 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:27:20 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel, curl_rt In-Reply-To: <201002151029.o1FATWih020619@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002151029.o1FATWih020619@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay a side comment though: remind me why we need to link in ldap, to curl-rt?? On Monday, February 15, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * curl: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 7.19.7,REV=2010.01.15 > ?- ? to: 7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15 > ?+ curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Now with additionaly dependency to libcares. > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 01:34:22 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:34:22 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (unstable) bind, dhcp, dnstop, memconf, postgrey, spamassassin In-Reply-To: <625385e31002150546l4aaa8a5an643c3aa575fe9b1b@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002150546l4aaa8a5an643c3aa575fe9b1b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: bleeaahhhh.. big set :-} ok on batch On Monday, February 15, 2010, Peter Bonivart wrote: > bind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > bind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > bind_chroot-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > bind_devel-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > bind_utils-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > bind_utils-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > dhcp-4.1.1,REV=2010.01.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > dhcp-4.1.1,REV=2010.01.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > dhcp_devel-4.1.1,REV=2010.01.19-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > libbind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > libbind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > memconf-2.13,REV=2010.01.18-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > postgrey-1.32,REV=2010.02.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > spamassassin-3.3.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > spamassassin-3.3.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > /peter > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 01:35:36 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:35:36 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_paramsvalidate In-Reply-To: <201002151424.o1FEOrQv022629@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002151424.o1FEOrQv022629@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay On Monday, February 15, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * new package: pm_paramsvalidate > ?+ pm_paramsvalidate-0.94,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pm_paramsvalidate-0.94,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 01:38:23 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:38:23 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: hmm... old package depended on both Mesa and gcc. new pkg does not. please detail the changes On Monday, February 15, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * plib: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.8.4 > ?- ? to: 1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15 > ?+ plib-1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ plib-1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 01:40:03 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:40:03 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libssh2, libssh2_devel In-Reply-To: <201002151637.o1FGbRGD024572@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002151637.o1FGbRGD024572@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay On Monday, February 15, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * libssh2: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.1,REV=2009.04.02 > ?- ? to: 1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15 > ?+ libssh2-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libssh2-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: libssh2_devel > ?+ libssh2_devel-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libssh2_devel-1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 02:07:25 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:07:25 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cupsd, fontforge, gnupg2, gnupg_agent, mysql5rt, pinentry, py_cheetah, py_curl, py_hachoir_core, py_hachoir_parser, py_suds, py_yaml, py_yaml_rt, pychecker, pysqlite2, shflags, slack, tree In-Reply-To: <201002141446.o1EEkbkU022043@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002141446.o1EEkbkU022043@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: issue 1: please put fewer things per email. it makes it a little easier to follow if issues come up issue #2: something did acually come up. tree has v8+ binaries in it On Sunday, February 14, 2010, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * cupsd: revision upgrade > ?* Fixes a problem: http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4168 > ?- from: 2009.11.12 > ?- ? to: 2010.01.25 > ?+ cupsd-1.4.2,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ cupsd-1.4.2,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: gnupg_agent > ?* Separated from gnupg2, can be used with gpg 1.x > ?+ gnupg_agent-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ gnupg_agent-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * gnupg2: patchlevel upgrade > ?* Removes the agent > ?- from: 2.0.10,REV=2009.04.02 > ?- ? to: 2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12 > ?+ gnupg2-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ gnupg2-2.0.13,REV=2009.12.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: py_suds > ?* Requested by skayser > ?+ py_suds-0.3.8,REV=2010.02.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * py_cheetah: revision upgrade > ?* Removes CSwpython-rt dependency > ?- from: 2009.12.15 > ?- ? to: 2010.01.31 > ?+ py_cheetah-2.4.0,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_cheetah-2.4.0,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: shflags > ?* A shell port of google-glflags > ?+ shflags-1.0.3,REV=2010.02.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: py_curl > ?* A user on IRC asked about it, had trouble building it > ?+ py_curl-7.19.0,REV=2010.01.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_curl-7.19.0,REV=2010.01.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * fontforge: revision upgrade > ?* Removes unnecessary dependencies > ?- from: 2009.12.14 > ?- ? to: 2010.01.31 > ?+ fontforge-0.20090923,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ fontforge-0.20090923,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * py_yaml: revision upgrade > ?* Removes CSwpython-rt dependency > ?- from: 2009.11.13 > ?- ? to: 2010.01.31 > ?+ py_yaml-3.09,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_yaml_rt-3.09,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_yaml_rt-3.09,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: slack > ?* A simple configuration management tool > ?+ slack-0.15.2,REV=2010.02.04-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * pysqlite2: patchlevel upgrade > ?* Removes CSwpython-rt dependency > ?- from: 2.5.5,REV=2009.06.05 > ?- ? to: 2.5.6,REV=2010.02.05 > ?+ pysqlite2-2.5.6,REV=2010.02.05-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pysqlite2-2.5.6,REV=2010.02.05-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * pinentry: revision upgrade > ?* Removes unnecessary dependencies > ?- from: 2009.12.06 > ?- ? to: 2010.01.28 > ?+ pinentry-0.7.6,REV=2010.01.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pinentry-0.7.6,REV=2010.01.28-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: py_hachoir > ?* Binary files parser > ?+ py_hachoir_core-1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_hachoir_parser-1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * tree: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.5.2.2,REV=2009.09.04 > ?- ? to: 1.5.3,REV=2010.02.02 > ?+ tree-1.5.3,REV=2010.02.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ tree-1.5.3,REV=2010.02.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * mysql5rt: revision upgrade > ?* A workaround for linking problems: > ? ?http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4149 > ?- from: 2010.01.08 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.08 > ?+ mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: pychecker > ?* Static analysis of Python code > ?+ pychecker-0.8.18,REV=2010.01.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > (Testing the pkgsubmissions mailing list.) > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 09:26:57 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:26:57 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cupsd, fontforge, gnupg2, gnupg_agent, mysql5rt, pinentry, py_cheetah, py_curl, py_hachoir_core, py_hachoir_parser, py_suds, py_yaml, py_yaml_rt, pychecker, pysqlite2, shflags, slack, tree In-Reply-To: References: <201002141446.o1EEkbkU022043@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > issue 1: please put fewer things per email. it makes it a little > easier to follow if issues come up Will do. > issue #2: something did acually come up. tree has v8+ binaries in it Right, looks like I one more checkpkg module to write to make sure we always catch this in the future. From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 10:00:46 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:00:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel, curl_rt In-Reply-To: References: <201002151029.o1FATWih020619@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <2434AAD0-BBDE-4611-A266-3B4BD0EDDD78@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 16.02.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Philip Brown: > okay > a side comment though: remind me why we need to link in ldap, to > curl-rt?? So that this works: curl -B "ldap://ldap.frontec.se/o=frontec??sub?mail=*sth.frontec.se/" Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 10:20:13 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:20:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 16.02.2010 um 01:38 schrieb Philip Brown: > old package depended on both Mesa and gcc. > new pkg does not. > > please detail the changes There are only static libraries and header files in there. There is no direct dependency from this package to the others. Additionally, simgear currently depends on it which is also unused as it is a compiletime dependency. Bets regards -- Dago > On Monday, February 15, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> The following package files are ready to be released: >> >> * plib: patchlevel upgrade >> - from: 1.8.4 >> - to: 1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15 >> + plib-1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + plib-1.8.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> >> -- >> $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ >> _______________________________________________ >> pkgsubmissions mailing list >> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions >> > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 10:22:36 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:22:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libcares, libcares_devel In-Reply-To: <201002121050.o1CAoL0V027592@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002121050.o1CAoL0V027592@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 07.02.2106 um 07:28 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * libcares: revision upgrade > - from: 2010.02.10 > - to: 2010.02.12 > + libcares-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcares-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcares_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcares_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Previous package had broken 64 bit includes Please release it, otherwise I can't rebuild curl with the new libssh2. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 10:23:48 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:23:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Fwd: newpkgs libcares, libcares_devel References: Message-ID: <54AF6996-59F1-4591-8DEF-C873041C5962@opencsw.org> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > Von: Dagobert Michelsen > Datum: 16. Februar 2010 10:22:36 MEZ > An: pkgsubmissions at lists.lists.opencsw.org Ok, replied to the old (broken) address, fwd'ing again. > Kopie: Release Manager > Betreff: Re: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libcares, libcares_devel > Antwort an: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > > Hi Phil, > > Am 07.02.2106 um 07:28 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: >> The following package files are ready to be released: >> >> * libcares: revision upgrade >> - from: 2010.02.10 >> - to: 2010.02.12 >> + libcares-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libcares-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libcares_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libcares_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> Previous package had broken 64 bit includes > > Please release it, otherwise I can't rebuild curl with the new > libssh2. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 10:52:35 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:52:35 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libidn Message-ID: <201002160952.o1G9qUlt006537@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * libidn: minor version upgrade - from: 1.16,REV=2010.01.14 - to: 1.18,REV=2010.02.16 + libidn-1.18,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libidn-1.18,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 11:03:08 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:03:08 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_rt, curl_devel Message-ID: <201002161003.o1GA34sK017871@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * curl: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.15 - to: 2010.02.16 + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Now compiled against libssh2 -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 11:03:23 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:03:23 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_rt, curl_devel Message-ID: <201002161003.o1GA3L6l017901@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * curl: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.15 - to: 2010.02.16 + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Now compiled against libssh2 -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 11:03:28 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:03:28 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_rt, curl_devel Message-ID: <201002161003.o1GA3QO8017907@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * curl: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.15 - to: 2010.02.16 + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Now compiled against libssh2 -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 11:03:40 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:03:40 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_rt, curl_devel Message-ID: <201002161003.o1GA3cMt017915@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * curl: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.15 - to: 2010.02.16 + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_devel-7.20.0,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Now compiled against libssh2 -- $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ From benny at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 13:01:43 2010 From: benny at opencsw.org (Benjamin von Mossner) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:01:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: xpdf Message-ID: <20100216120143.GB29753@vonmossner.de> Hey, the following package is now fixed and ready to be released. xpdf-3.02p4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz xpdf-3.02p4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz cheers, benny -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN | Benjamin von Mossner \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL | benny at vonmossner.de X / \ multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 14:30:21 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:30:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) Message-ID: <201002161330.o1GDULUS013243@login.bo.opencsw.org> Date: 2010-02-16 14:28:56.331329 Subject: newpkgs libfbopenssl The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: libfbopenssl + libfbopenssl-0.0.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libfbopenssl-0.0.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Optional dependency for curl doing SPNEGO. Can also be used for Apache mod-spnego to use Windows login credentials. -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 15:56:51 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:56:51 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_textformat, pm_htmltagset, pm_htmltree, pm_html2text Message-ID: <201002161456.o1GEulcG014765@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * pm_htmltree: revision upgrade - from: 2008.03.13 - to: 2010.02.16 + pm_htmltree-3.23,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * pm_htmltagset: minor version upgrade - from: 3.04,REV=2006.01.23 - to: 3.20,REV=2010.02.16 + pm_htmltagset-3.20,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: pm_html2text + pm_html2text-0.003,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: pm_textformat + pm_textformat-0.52,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz Some takeovers, some updates, some now. Nothing spectacular. -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 18:36:38 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:36:38 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel, curl_rt In-Reply-To: <2434AAD0-BBDE-4611-A266-3B4BD0EDDD78@opencsw.org> References: <201002151029.o1FATWih020619@login.bo.opencsw.org> <2434AAD0-BBDE-4611-A266-3B4BD0EDDD78@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 16.02.2010 um 01:27 schrieb Philip Brown: >> >> okay >> a side comment though: remind me why we need to link in ldap, to curl-rt?? > > So that this works: > ?curl -B "ldap://ldap.frontec.se/o=frontec??sub?mail=*sth.frontec.se/" > > yikes. while that's sort-of-useful... in a vague theoretical way... most sane people will use an actual ldap browsing tool, not "curl", for this sort of thing. I'm not sure that adding yet ANOTHER set of depends to curlrt, is really a good thing. I think the package may be better off without this support. Or possibly we could loose-link it and have it as a non-mandatory dependancy or something? From hson at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 23:26:27 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:26:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gd Message-ID: <4B7B1B93.1050806@opencsw.org> Since Mike Watters is on sabbatical and we need to push some stuff, I'll be making releases for some of his packages. First of those is gd. Changes: Link with CSW X11 libs instead of openwin versions. Files: gd-2.0.35,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gd-2.0.35,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 23:33:59 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:33:59 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > Am 16.02.2010 um 01:38 schrieb Philip Brown: > >> please detail the changes > > There are only static libraries and header files in there. There is > no direct dependency from this package to the others. Additionally, > simgear currently depends on it which is also unused as it is a > compiletime dependency. > > Hmm. It sounds like what you are saying is, "there are no dynamic shared-library dependencies, since there are only static libraries there". However, if those static libraries are useless without those other libraries (where "useless" is defined as "you cant compile with plib, without those other libs present), then perhaps it makes the most sense to restore the original pkg level dependencies? From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 23:35:27 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:35:27 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Fwd: newpkgs libcares, libcares_devel In-Reply-To: <54AF6996-59F1-4591-8DEF-C873041C5962@opencsw.org> References: <54AF6996-59F1-4591-8DEF-C873041C5962@opencsw.org> Message-ID: in process From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 23:36:25 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:36:25 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libidn In-Reply-To: <201002160952.o1G9qUlt006537@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002160952.o1G9qUlt006537@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batching On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * libidn: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.16,REV=2010.01.14 > ?- ? to: 1.18,REV=2010.02.16 > ?+ libidn-1.18,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libidn-1.18,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 113 2010-01-11 12:08:24Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 23:38:20 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:38:20 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: xpdf In-Reply-To: <20100216120143.GB29753@vonmossner.de> References: <20100216120143.GB29753@vonmossner.de> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Benjamin von Mossner wrote: > Hey, > > the following package is now fixed and ready to be released. > great. thanks for the fix From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 23:44:20 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:44:20 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <201002161330.o1GDULUS013243@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002161330.o1GDULUS013243@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: oh Good Lord.... attack of the optional dependancies :-) I appreciate that you want to add in "full functionality", Dago. But perhaps it's time to consider splitting curl, into a "curl", and "curl_fancy" or something? :-) Nost people will only want just zlib and openssl support. Adding in all this extra stuffs, could conceivably be annoying when they watch the dependancy spam. What about something like: curl - core client curl_rt - core-client shared lib curl_fancy - "fancy" optional support libs, plus client compiled to use it. People who want all the "extra" stuff, wont care that they are pulling in both the client and the libs in one package. in contrast, people who want something trimmed down and simplified, will care about all the optional garbage, particularly if they just want libcurl, and they dont even want the client binaries. The naming is just a suggestion, I'm totally open to suggestions about name and regrouping. What do you think? On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Date: 2010-02-16 14:28:56.331329 > Subject: newpkgs libfbopenssl > > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * new package: libfbopenssl > ?+ libfbopenssl-0.0.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libfbopenssl-0.0.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Optional dependency for curl doing SPNEGO. Can also be used for > Apache mod-spnego to use Windows login credentials. > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 16 23:47:00 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:47:00 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_textformat, pm_htmltagset, pm_htmltree, pm_html2text In-Reply-To: <201002161456.o1GEulcG014765@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002161456.o1GEulcG014765@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay, batching On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * pm_htmltree: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2008.03.13 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.16 > ?+ pm_htmltree-3.23,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * pm_htmltagset: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 3.04,REV=2006.01.23 > ?- ? to: 3.20,REV=2010.02.16 > ?+ pm_htmltagset-3.20,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: pm_html2text > ?+ pm_html2text-0.003,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: pm_textformat > ?+ pm_textformat-0.52,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > Some takeovers, some updates, some now. Nothing spectacular. > > -- > $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 23:48:46 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:48:46 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gd In-Reply-To: <4B7B1B93.1050806@opencsw.org> References: <4B7B1B93.1050806@opencsw.org> Message-ID: batching On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > Since Mike Watters is on sabbatical and we need to push some stuff, I'll be > making releases for some of his packages. First of those is gd. > > Changes: > Link with CSW X11 libs instead of openwin versions. > > Files: > gd-2.0.35,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > gd-2.0.35,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From hson at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 01:18:53 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:18:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs htmldoc Message-ID: <4B7B35ED.8090004@opencsw.org> Changes: Split fonts and docs in separate package Linked to current jpeg lib Files: htmldoc-1.8.27,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz htmldoc-1.8.27,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz htmldoc_common-1.8.27,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz From hson at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 01:19:50 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:19:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gengetopt Message-ID: <4B7B3626.8050608@opencsw.org> Changes: Update to 2.22.4 64-bit binaries included Files: gengetopt-2.22.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gengetopt-2.22.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 09:42:30 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:42:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <19709664-1393-4F09-B266-89240B52F6EA@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 16.02.2010 um 23:33 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> >> Am 16.02.2010 um 01:38 schrieb Philip Brown: >>> please detail the changes >> >> There are only static libraries and header files in there. There is >> no direct dependency from this package to the others. Additionally, >> simgear currently depends on it which is also unused as it is a >> compiletime dependency. > > Hmm. It sounds like what you are saying is, "there are no dynamic > shared-library dependencies, since there are only static libraries > there". > > However, if those static libraries are useless without those other > libraries (where "useless" is defined as "you cant compile with plib, > without those other libs present), then perhaps it makes the most > sense to restore the original pkg level dependencies? I guess I'll delay that one. Further inspection showed that there are more dependencies and as the depending library CSWsimgear also provides only static libs I'll delay until I actually use it. It seems to be needed for some 3D games. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 09:52:31 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:52:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) In-Reply-To: References: <201002161330.o1GDULUS013243@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <5CC8060F-FA46-44DE-B253-2AB68AD89428@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 16.02.2010 um 23:44 schrieb Philip Brown: > oh Good Lord.... attack of the optional dependancies :-) > > I appreciate that you want to add in "full functionality", Dago. But > perhaps it's time to consider splitting curl, into a "curl", and > "curl_fancy" or something? :-) > Nost people will only want just zlib and openssl support. > Adding in all this extra stuffs, could conceivably be annoying when > they watch the dependancy spam. > > What about something like: > > curl - core client > curl_rt - core-client shared lib > curl_fancy - "fancy" optional support libs, plus client compiled > to use it. > > People who want all the "extra" stuff, wont care that they are pulling > in both the client and the libs in one package. > > in contrast, people who want something trimmed down and simplified, > will care about all the optional garbage, particularly if they just > want libcurl, and they dont even want the client binaries. > > The naming is just a suggestion, I'm totally open to suggestions about > name and regrouping. > What do you think? Excellent idea! The dependency would go to the basic package which installs mylib-basic.so and links low-pri via alternatives. When CSWmylib-fancy is installed it changes the links via higher priority automatically just by installing the new package. This will also be useful for lots of other libs which could use some more flavor, like neon where Sebastian noted that the libproxy-dependency (correctly) pulls in X11 which may not be expected. I have updated http://wiki.opencsw.org/package-alternatives accordingly. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 10:59:45 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:59:45 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs diffutils Message-ID: <201002170959.o1H9xfKa007433@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * diffutils: minor version upgrade - from: 2.8.1,REV=2005.11.10 - to: 2.9,REV=2010.02.17 + diffutils-2.9,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + diffutils-2.9,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Takeover from Phil for version bump. Now built with GAR. -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 14:51:07 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:51:07 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs phpldapadmin Message-ID: <201002171351.o1HDp3j6018163@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * phpldapadmin: revision upgrade - from: 2009.09.23 - to: 2010.02.17 + phpldapadmin-1.2.0.5,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz This fixes #4283 and small version bump. -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 15:59:30 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:59:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <201002161330.o1GDULUS013243@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002161330.o1GDULUS013243@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 16.02.2010 um 14:30 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Date: 2010-02-16 14:28:56.331329 > Subject: newpkgs libfbopenssl > > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * new package: libfbopenssl > + libfbopenssl-0.0.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libfbopenssl-0.0.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Optional dependency for curl doing SPNEGO. Can also be used for > Apache mod-spnego to use Windows login credentials. Could you please release this anyway regardless of the curl dependency? Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 16:53:41 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:53:41 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_inline, pm_taskweaken Message-ID: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: pm_inline + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: pm_taskweaken + pm_taskweaken-1.03,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Two new Perl modules. -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From ellson at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 18:01:42 2010 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:01:42 -0500 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_inline, pm_taskweaken In-Reply-To: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B7C20F6.6060804@opencsw.org> On 12/31/69 19:00, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * new package: pm_inline > + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > * new package: pm_taskweaken > + pm_taskweaken-1.03,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Two new Perl modules. > > Dago, I don't know if the problem is at your end, but I'm receiving mail from you dated 12/31/69 19:00 The full source of this email as I received it is attached below. The interesting parts would seem to be: - the decimal seconds in the originating timestamp: Date: 2010-02-17 16:53:27.497233 - the spam filter diagnostic of an invalid date: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.354 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, INVALID_DATE=1.245] autolearn=no I don't think anything has changed at this end and I've not noticed this problem with other correspondents. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: X-Original-To: ellson at opencsw.org Delivered-To: ellson at bender.opencsw.org Received: from bender. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.opencsw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933898F6 for; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:53:44 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org Delivered-To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.opencsw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0778CF for; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:53:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at opencsw.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.354 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.354 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, INVALID_DATE=1.245] autolearn=no Received: from mail.opencsw.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.opencsw.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UGCdCSL3SMRn for; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:53:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from login.bo.opencsw.org (login.csw.baltic-online.de [213.178.77.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.opencsw.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B611E8CE for; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:53:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from login.bo.opencsw.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by login.bo.opencsw.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1HFrckq025466 for; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:53:38 +0100 (CET) Received: (from dam at localhost) by login.bo.opencsw.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id o1HFrbGH025452; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:53:38 +0100 (CET) Message-Id:<201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452 at login.bo.opencsw.org> From: Dagobert Michelsen To: Release Manager Date: 2010-02-17 16:53:27.497233 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_inline, pm_taskweaken X-BeenThere: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:, List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:, MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: pkgsubmissions-bounces+ellson=opencsw.org at lists.opencsw.org Errors-To: pkgsubmissions-bounces+ellson=opencsw.org at lists.opencsw.org Lines: 16 The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: pm_inline + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: pm_taskweaken + pm_taskweaken-1.03,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Two new Perl modules. -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ _______________________________________________ pkgsubmissions mailing list pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 18:46:30 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:46:30 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (libfbopenssl) Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > ... > Could you please release this anyway regardless of the curl > dependency? > Hmm.. .in general principle, sure. however.... I think you need to unify the name more. or sort out discrepancy between description and name. "libfbopenssl" ?? sounds like some kind of odd visual(framebuffer) openssl library ;-) and nowhere is there "spnego" in the name. yet the description merely says, "SPNEGO API" maybe a different name entirely? I dont know much about the software, but since it comes from http://sourceforge.net/projects/modgssapache/ maybe mod_gss? hmm. except it isnt an apache module I guess, but a sub-library from that project. hrrrm... Other suggestions? From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 18:47:31 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:47:31 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gengetopt In-Reply-To: <4B7B3626.8050608@opencsw.org> References: <4B7B3626.8050608@opencsw.org> Message-ID: great On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > Changes: > Update to 2.22.4 > 64-bit binaries included > > Files: > gengetopt-2.22.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > gengetopt-2.22.4,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ____________________________ From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 18:48:48 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:48:48 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs htmldoc In-Reply-To: <4B7B35ED.8090004@opencsw.org> References: <4B7B35ED.8090004@opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > Changes: > Split fonts and docs in separate package > Linked to current jpeg lib > > Files: > htmldoc-1.8.27,REV=2010.02.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 18:49:58 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:49:58 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: <19709664-1393-4F09-B266-89240B52F6EA@opencsw.org> References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> <19709664-1393-4F09-B266-89240B52F6EA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: > I guess I'll delay that one. Further inspection showed that there are > more dependencies and as the depending library CSWsimgear also provides > only static libs I'll delay until I actually use it. It seems to be > needed for some 3D games. okay. please remove from newpkgs until you are ready From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 18:53:34 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:53:34 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs diffutils In-Reply-To: <201002170959.o1H9xfKa007433@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002170959.o1H9xfKa007433@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * diffutils: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 2.8.1,REV=2005.11.10 > ?- ? to: 2.9,REV=2010.02.17 > ?+ diffutils-2.9,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ diffutils-2.9,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Takeover from Phil for version bump. Now built with GAR. > yay! erm... wow.. it really has added a boatload more dependancies... from virtually nothing, to adding gettext, iconv, and libsigsegv. but okay. From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 19:33:16 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:33:16 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp Message-ID: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz - fixed broken man page pcp-1.09,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz - new -- /peter From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 20:30:44 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:30:44 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > dnstop-20090128,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > - fixed broken man page > batched. > pcp-1.09,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > - new I'm not sure this is the best naming choice, though. "pcp" is a sadly generic short name, that is used by quite a few other things. You might want to bring this one up on the maintainers list. From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 20:31:30 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:31:30 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs phpldapadmin In-Reply-To: <201002171351.o1HDp3j6018163@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002171351.o1HDp3j6018163@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 17 20:33:36 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:33:36 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_inline, pm_taskweaken In-Reply-To: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * new package: pm_inline > ?+ pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz okay. kinda... > * new package: pm_taskweaken > ?+ pm_taskweaken-1.03,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz erm.. sparc only?? it would seem as though both of these are slightly misbuilt "ARCH=all" packages. From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 21:08:38 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:08:38 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> pcp-1.09,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> - new > > I'm not sure this is the best naming choice, though. > > "pcp" is a sadly generic short name, that is used by quite a few other things. It's what it's called on http://www.unix.ms/pcp/, apparently it's short for PID con Port so how about CSWpcp for package and pidconport for catalog? -- /peter From skayser at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 22:11:11 2010 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:11:11 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Peter Bonivart wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >>> pcp-1.09,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz >>> - new >> >> I'm not sure this is the best naming choice, though. >> >> "pcp" is a sadly generic short name, that is used by quite a few other >> things. > > It's what it's called on http://www.unix.ms/pcp/, apparently it's > short for PID con Port so how about CSWpcp for package and pidconport > for catalog? I hope it's okay to jump in here. Please, please, noooooooooooo. In my experience those disparate pkg and catalog names are a common cause of confusion for most people, in particular newcomers. If we want to avoid PCP because of name clashes, how about pidconport/CSWpidconport (and PCP in the description string)? I realize, that it then doesn't have pcp in either string any more (and thus can't be found with -a), but those different pkg / catalog names are such a pain. However you decide, thanks for packaging it, Peter. Sebastian From glaw at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 23:10:14 2010 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:10:14 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] updated: puppet-0.25.4 Message-ID: it's the latest and greatest... ...not the gar build, unfortunately... but it works. -- Gary Law glaw at opencsw.org From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 17 23:51:31 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:51:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) Message-ID: <201002172251.o1HMpVKx021179@login.bo.opencsw.org> Date: 2010-02-17 23:51:27.876723 Subject: newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt The following package files are ready to be released: * sqlite3: patchlevel upgrade - from: 3.6.21,REV=2010.01.04 - to: 3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17 + sqlite3-3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + sqlite3-3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + sqlite3_devel-3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + sqlite3_devel-3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + sqlite3_rt-3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + sqlite3_rt-3.6.22,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 17 23:51:50 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:51:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) Message-ID: <201002172251.o1HMpo6i021545@login.bo.opencsw.org> Date: 2010-02-17 23:51:44.606679 Subject: newpkgs dbus_glib, dbus_glibdev The following package files are ready to be released: * dbus_glib: minor version upgrade - from: 0.80,REV=2009.03.26 - to: 0.84,REV=2010.02.17 + dbus_glib-0.84,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + dbus_glib-0.84,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + dbus_glibdev-0.84,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + dbus_glibdev-0.84,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 17 23:52:10 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:52:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) Message-ID: <201002172252.o1HMqAp1022660@login.bo.opencsw.org> Date: 2010-02-17 23:51:54.195718 Subject: newpkgs pixman The following package files are ready to be released: * pixman: minor version upgrade - from: 0.15.8,REV=2009.06.02 - to: 0.17.6,REV=2010.02.17 + pixman-0.17.6,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pixman-0.17.6,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz The package now includes 64bits libraries -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From william at wbonnet.net Thu Feb 18 01:17:23 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:17:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject) Message-ID: <201002180017.o1I0HNFp007401@login.bo.opencsw.org> Date: 2010-02-18 01:11:16.354665 Subject: newpkgs seamonkey The following package files are ready to be released: * seamonkey: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.1.11,REV=2008.07.17 - to: 1.1.18,REV=2009.09.14 + seamonkey-1.1.18,REV=2009.09.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + seamonkey-1.1.18,REV=2009.09.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- $Id: opencsw.py 123 2010-02-16 10:16:35Z wahwah $ From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 08:56:01 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:56:01 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] updated: puppet-0.25.4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Gary Law wrote: > it's the latest and greatest... > > ...not the gar build, unfortunately... > > but it works. Using cswclassutils (which is something you're not willing to do) is orthogonal to using GAR. How about removing the use of cswclassutils from the GAR build? Maciej From glaw at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 10:47:41 2010 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:47:41 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] updated: puppet-0.25.4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 18 February 2010 07:56, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > Using cswclassutils (which is something you're not willing to do) is > orthogonal to using GAR. How about removing the use of cswclassutils > from the GAR build? I might do that actually. It would be more maintainable in GAR, and it's the only one of my ports that doesn't do this. Gary -- Gary Law Email: garylaw at garylaw.net Chat googletalk/messenger: gary.law at gmail.com iChat/jabber/AIM: gary.law at mac.com From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 11:08:37 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:08:37 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (libfbopenssl) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5921A3A6-93E9-48E3-A78E-98FF0CCDFC4A@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 17.02.2010 um 18:46 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> ... >> Could you please release this anyway regardless of the curl >> dependency? >> > > Hmm.. .in general principle, sure. > however.... I think you need to unify the name more. or sort out > discrepancy between description and name. > > "libfbopenssl" ?? sounds like some kind of odd visual(framebuffer) > openssl library ;-) From readme.txt: > fbopenssl is a library containing extensions to OpenSSL, including > support for: > > - GSS-API (RFC 2743) > - SPNEGO (RFC 2478) And for "fb" I would say: > Author: Frank Balluffi > and nowhere is there "spnego" in the name. yet the description > merely says, > > "SPNEGO API" I could change it to "Extensions to OpenSSL including support for GSS- API and SPNEGO" Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 11:12:21 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:12:21 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> <19709664-1393-4F09-B266-89240B52F6EA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <2740262B-1532-44F6-9549-74F5B1C2C7CB@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 17.02.2010 um 18:49 schrieb Philip Brown: >> I guess I'll delay that one. Further inspection showed that there are >> more dependencies and as the depending library CSWsimgear also >> provides >> only static libs I'll delay until I actually use it. It seems to be >> needed for some 3D games. > > okay. please remove from newpkgs until you are ready I would prefer it if you as release manager would move around or delete things there. This would make a clean "API" using submitpkg, otherwise it would incurre manually fiddling with directories which we wanted to get rid of. Or we need a "revoke submission" option in submitpkg. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 11:24:35 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:24:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_inline, pm_taskweaken In-Reply-To: References: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <006E9F8D-9EED-462B-AE0D-51083F72CA29@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 17.02.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> The following package files are ready to be released: >> >> * new package: pm_inline >> + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + pm_inline-0.45,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > okay. kinda... This one is ok for sparc/i386 as it contains linker information in auto/. >> * new package: pm_taskweaken >> + pm_taskweaken-1.03,REV=2010.02.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > erm.. sparc only?? > > > it would seem as though both of these are slightly misbuilt > "ARCH=all" packages. It was ACHALL = 1 instead of ARCHALL = 1. Grrrrr.... Redone now in newpkgs/. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 13:59:36 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:59:36 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs alternatives Message-ID: <201002181259.o1ICxV9j025146@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: alternatives + alternatives-1.3.30c,REV=2010.02.18-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + alternatives-1.3.30c,REV=2010.02.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Preserved files are now stored in a package-specific directory of the file to be preserved instead of CSWalternatives. -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8640 $. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 14:49:43 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:49:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] alternatives IRC In-Reply-To: References: <17c72aea0d915d4d2731938dad9dcadc@WIKIDOT> <3ae562fe5a4e6e2617d58a67dbe56568@as2-1.s.wikidot.com> <1A9A724B-E054-4C4A-ABBD-27ABC08CA979@opencsw.org> <88606D38-1933-48B6-9C4F-4465E4995DE6@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <651D1EE7-0464-499C-832A-958C179917AF@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 17.02.2010 um 22:13 schrieb Philip Brown: > So.. I noticed that in the alternatives package, you had a prototype > entry for > /etc/opt/csw/preserve/CSWalternatives (or whatever it was). > > it seemed to me as though perhaps you misunderstood what I was saying > about that directory? > Perhaps you are preserving state for each separate package under > there? > > I dont think that is a good idea, for cleanup purposes. > > The idea I was trying to communicate with my cswpreserveconf > reference, was that if > CSWmutt called alternatives, with some kind of communication, then > our alternatives sytemcould then store that information under > > /etc/opt/csw/preserve/CSWmutt/{???} > > that way, if someone called > > pkgutil purge mutt > > then pkgutil would know to just do > > rm -rf /etc/opt/csw/preserve/CSWmutt > > without any other package-specific tweaks to it. Ah, I see. Ok, the classaction scripts have been adjusted to now use /etc/opt/csw/preserve//alternatives/ to preserve manual selection state. I used $PKG for this, there seems however to be another variable $PKGINST defined which may or may not better be used, maybe someone can enlighten me of the difference? The package works very nice for me using automake, tcpwrappers and mutt and could IMHO be released. Best regards -- Dago From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 18:09:41 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:09:41 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] alternatives IRC In-Reply-To: <651D1EE7-0464-499C-832A-958C179917AF@opencsw.org> References: <17c72aea0d915d4d2731938dad9dcadc@WIKIDOT> <3ae562fe5a4e6e2617d58a67dbe56568@as2-1.s.wikidot.com> <1A9A724B-E054-4C4A-ABBD-27ABC08CA979@opencsw.org> <88606D38-1933-48B6-9C4F-4465E4995DE6@opencsw.org> <651D1EE7-0464-499C-832A-958C179917AF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > Ah, I see. Ok, the classaction scripts have been adjusted to now use > ?/etc/opt/csw/preserve//alternatives/ > to preserve manual selection state great. I think i'll try to release it today >. I used $PKG for this, there seems > however to be another variable $PKGINST defined which may or may not > better be used, maybe someone can enlighten me of the difference? going from memory, PKGINST might be the system-specific instance. eg: for packages that support multiple instances, it might be CSWmutt.2 But given that we dont support that sort of thing, seems like you using plain $PKG is the right thing to do. From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 18 20:37:39 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:37:39 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs alternatives In-Reply-To: <201002181259.o1ICxV9j025146@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002181259.o1ICxV9j025146@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: in process On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * new package: alternatives > ?+ alternatives-1.3.30c,REV=2010.02.18-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ alternatives-1.3.30c,REV=2010.02.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Preserved files are now stored in a package-specific directory of the > file to be preserved instead of CSWalternatives. > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 18 23:11:13 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:11:13 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > > I hope it's okay to jump in here. Please, please, noooooooooooo. In my > experience those disparate pkg and catalog names are a common cause of > confusion for most people, in particular newcomers. If we want to avoid > PCP because of name clashes, how about pidconport/CSWpidconport (and PCP > in the description string)? I realize, that it then doesn't have pcp in > either string any more (and thus can't be found with -a), but those > different pkg / catalog names are such a pain. > I agree on making the software name more similar. how about: PKG=CSWpidconport NAME=pidconport - pcp utility to check open ports or something like that? You might want to rename the actual BINARY to be "pidconport" or something, instead of "pcp", too. We've occasionally (once or twice) renamed binaries because of odd names. Something to consider, although it's not something I'd consider mandatory. From bonivart at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 23:11:43 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:11:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Message-ID: <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > I hope it's okay to jump in here. Please, please, noooooooooooo. In my > experience those disparate pkg and catalog names are a common cause of > confusion for most people, in particular newcomers. If we want to avoid > PCP because of name clashes, how about pidconport/CSWpidconport (and PCP > in the description string)? I realize, that it then doesn't have pcp in > either string any more (and thus can't be found with -a), but those > different pkg / catalog names are such a pain. So what choices do we have? CSWpcp / pcp CSWpcp / pidconport CSWpidconport / pidconport I thought we liked short names, in this case it's called pcp by its author as well so it's no freakish abbreviation I came up with. I could go with the last one as well but I think users will look for pcp, not for pidconport. -- /peter From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 23:14:41 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:14:41 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (seamonkey) Message-ID: Hi William, dont you need to also depend on CSWlibice and CSWlibsm? On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:17 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > Date: 2010-02-18 01:11:16.354665 > Subject: newpkgs seamonkey > > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * seamonkey: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.1.11,REV=2008.07.17 > ?- ? to: 1.1.18,REV=2009.09.14 > ?+ seamonkey-1.1.18,REV=2009.09.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ seamonkey-1.1.18,REV=2009.09.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 23:16:52 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:16:52 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] updated: puppet-0.25.4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: okay On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Gary Law wrote: > it's the latest and greatest... > > ...not the gar build, unfortunately... > > but it works. > > -- > Gary Law > glaw at opencsw.org > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 23:41:04 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:41:04 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs plib In-Reply-To: <2740262B-1532-44F6-9549-74F5B1C2C7CB@opencsw.org> References: <201002151629.o1FGTnrq006596@login.bo.opencsw.org> <2B06EC21-3FE0-4AFF-85E5-AE804DAAC721@opencsw.org> <19709664-1393-4F09-B266-89240B52F6EA@opencsw.org> <2740262B-1532-44F6-9549-74F5B1C2C7CB@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > >> >> okay. please remove from newpkgs until you are ready > > I would prefer it if you as release manager would move around > or delete things there. however, that would make more work for people who had spent a lot of time putting together binaries or something in the package, needed to make an adjustment, and did not make a copy of it. both ways potentially irritate someone. However, ONE of the ways, means less work for ME. exponentially less. Therefore, I choose that way :) > Or we need a > "revoke submission" option in submitpkg. and/or an "overwrite old version" option. which should really be default behaviour, in my opinion. From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 18 23:42:26 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:26 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_inline, pm_taskweaken In-Reply-To: <006E9F8D-9EED-462B-AE0D-51083F72CA29@opencsw.org> References: <201002171553.o1HFrbGH025452@login.bo.opencsw.org> <006E9F8D-9EED-462B-AE0D-51083F72CA29@opencsw.org> Message-ID: both now batched From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 18 23:44:27 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:44:27 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (libfbopenssl) In-Reply-To: <5921A3A6-93E9-48E3-A78E-98FF0CCDFC4A@opencsw.org> References: <5921A3A6-93E9-48E3-A78E-98FF0CCDFC4A@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, *wave* >> and nowhere is there "spnego" in the name. yet the description merely >> says, >> >> "SPNEGO API" > > I could change it to "Extensions to OpenSSL including support for GSS-API > and SPNEGO" > aha. yes I think that would help clarify it. From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 23:47:34 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:47:34 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >> I hope it's okay to jump in here. Please, please, noooooooooooo. In my >> experience those disparate pkg and catalog names are a common cause of >> confusion for most people, in particular newcomers. If we want to avoid >> PCP because of name clashes, how about pidconport/CSWpidconport (and PCP >> in the description string)? I realize, that it then doesn't have pcp in >> either string any more (and thus can't be found with -a), but those >> different pkg / catalog names are such a pain. > > So what choices do we have? > > CSWpcp / pcp > CSWpcp / pidconport > CSWpidconport / pidconport > > I thought we liked short names, well yes, shortname, as opposed to really-long-extended-name. But there's nothing wrong with a reasonable medium length name, in my opinion :) > in this case it's called pcp by its > author as well so it's no freakish abbreviation I came up with. I > could go with the last one as well but I think users will look for > pcp, not for pidconport. I agree, users of THAT pcp, will look for pcp first, but then others of OTHER "pcp" programs will also look for that, and get confused. Woudl you mind doing a little research, and poking around for other distributions' packages of pidconport, and comparing their naming choices please? I did a little search for "packges of pcp" already, and got a mess of conflicting names and programs, which is why I circled back. From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 00:05:03 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:05:03 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e31002181505x445953a2m6f4b4ab8046a186f@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > I agree, users of THAT pcp, will look for pcp first, but then others > of OTHER "pcp" programs will also look for that, and get confused. What are those other pcp programs? Solaris doesn't have anything and we don't package anything. I only found Performance Co-Pilot which can be shortened to PCP. It's an SGI product mainly for Linux. Apparently it can be built for Solaris. Is that what you're thinking of? > Woudl you mind doing a little research, and poking around for other > distributions' packages of pidconport, and comparing their naming > choices please? Since this is Solaris specific that was pretty easy - no one else (BW, SFE, SFW) has it. So nothing to compare with. Except that the author himself calls it pcp. > I did a little search for "packges of pcp" already, and got a mess of > conflicting names and programs, which is why I circled back. What? Anything we may include? -- /peter From william at wbonnet.net Fri Feb 19 00:21:16 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:21:16 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (seamonkey) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B7DCB6C.9020708@wbonnet.net> Hi > dont you need to also depend on CSWlibice and CSWlibsm? > I guess i should... the package i submitted is a few month old (from testing). I'm rebuild it and taking it through new checkpkg. I'll answer you and resubmit package this week end cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 01:20:26 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:20:26 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <625385e31002181505x445953a2m6f4b4ab8046a186f@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002181505x445953a2m6f4b4ab8046a186f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> I agree, users of THAT pcp, will look for pcp first, but then others >> of OTHER "pcp" programs will also look for that, and get confused. > > What are those other pcp programs? Solaris doesn't have anything and > we don't package anything. I only found Performance Co-Pilot which can > be shortened to PCP. It's an SGI product mainly for Linux. Apparently > it can be built for Solaris. Is that what you're thinking of? yes. (pcp, on both debian and ubuntu). and I think there was one other hit for "pcp package", but unfortunately, I dont recall what it was about. > Since this is Solaris specific that was pretty easy - no one else (BW, > SFE, SFW) has it. So nothing to compare with. Except that the author > himself calls it pcp. seems like that is good news, and bad news. most of what we do, is provide "general packages, that solaris lacks". That is to say, the majority of people using our packages, use them to get stuff on solaris, that they are already used to having elsewhere. So seems to me, that the majority of people looking for "pcp", would be expecting the more general interpretation, not the solaris specific "php" From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 09:48:32 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:48:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002181505x445953a2m6f4b4ab8046a186f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e31002190048p3c1bc418t366dc8929e5979e0@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Philip Brown wrote: >> Since this is Solaris specific that was pretty easy - no one else (BW, >> SFE, SFW) has it. So nothing to compare with. Except that the author >> himself calls it pcp. > > seems like that is good news, and bad news. > most of what we do, is provide "general packages, that solaris lacks". > That is to say, the majority of people using our packages, use them to > get stuff on solaris, that they are already used to having elsewhere. > > So seems to me, that the majority of people looking for "pcp", would > be expecting the more general interpretation, not the solaris specific > "php" But none of those have Performance Co-Pilot either so who knows what people are looking for? Performance Co-Pilot was started in 1998 and from 2003 it has been able to run on Solaris. Still no one has packaged it for Solaris and you're holding your breath about possible collision/confusion? PCP is Solaris specific and it's the first one to be packaged, isn't it logical that the second one will have to adjust? If it ever becomes an issue. -- /peter From william at wbonnet.net Fri Feb 19 10:49:56 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:49:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> Hi Thanks Dago. Phil, is there any reason for CSWxf86miscproto not to be released ? I'm going to dig for old emails i may have missed ;) cheers W. Le 19 f?vr. 2010 ? 09:17, Dagobert Michelsen a ?crit : > Hi William, > > Am 19.02.2010 um 07:57 schrieb William Bonnet: >> Please could you install CSWxf86miscproto on the farm ? >> >> thanks in advance > > I would like to, but it hasn't been released yet: > >> web at web [web]:/home/web/bin > pkgutil -a | grep xf86 >> x11_xf86bigfontproto CSWx11xf86bigftproto 1.2.0,REV=2010.01.17 3.0 KB >> x11_xf86dgaproto CSWx11xf86dgaproto 2.1,REV=2010.01.17 5.1 KB >> x11_xf86driproto CSWx11xf86driproto 2.1.0,REV=2010.01.17 4.0 KB >> x11_xf86vidmodeproto CSWx11xf86vidmdproto 2.3,REV=2010.01.17 4.1 KB > > I just synced from the primary. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 11:02:04 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:02:04 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs automake, mutt, mutt_base, mutt_ncurses, mutt_slang Message-ID: <201002191001.o1JA1xAW009203@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * mutt: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.5.19,REV=2009.03.27 - to: 1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19 + mutt-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: mutt_ + mutt_base-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mutt_base-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + mutt_ncurses-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mutt_ncurses-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + mutt_slang-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mutt_slang-1.5.20,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * automake: revision upgrade - from: 2010.01.25 - to: 2010.02.19 + automake-1.11.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz These are now with full alternatives support. -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8640 $. From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 11:02:59 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:02:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (libfbopenssl) In-Reply-To: References: <5921A3A6-93E9-48E3-A78E-98FF0CCDFC4A@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 18.02.2010 um 23:44 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> Hi Phil, > *wave* > >>> and nowhere is there "spnego" in the name. yet the description >>> merely >>> says, >>> >>> "SPNEGO API" >> >> I could change it to "Extensions to OpenSSL including support for >> GSS-API >> and SPNEGO" > > aha. yes I think that would help clarify it. The packages have been replaced with updated versions in newpkgs/. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 17:10:13 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:10:13 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pigz Message-ID: <201002191610.o1JGA9WC021651@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * pigz: revision upgrade - from: 2009.09.04 - to: 2010.02.15 + pigz-2.1.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pigz-2.1.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz This fixes #4268. -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8640 $. From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 19:09:03 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:09:03 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (seamonkey) In-Reply-To: <4B7DCB6C.9020708@wbonnet.net> References: <4B7DCB6C.9020708@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:21 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > Hi > >> dont you need to also depend on CSWlibice and CSWlibsm? >> > > I guess i should... > > the package i submitted is a few month old (from testing). I'm rebuild it > and taking it through new checkpkg. > > I'll answer you and resubmit package this week end I think running it through the new checkpkg is a good idea. You don't have to rebuild it to check if you need to depend on CSWlibice, just point checkpkg at it: .../checkpkg .../seamonkey-..pkg.gz From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 22:20:32 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:20:32 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:49 AM, William Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > Thanks Dago. > > Phil, is there any reason for CSWxf86miscproto not to be released ? > > I'm going to dig for old emails i may have missed ;) > Hmm. well I dont see it laying around in newpkgs. I'm not "Holding it up" as far as I'm aware. From william at wbonnet.net Fri Feb 19 22:28:09 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:28:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <4B7F0269.2050207@wbonnet.net> Hi Phil > Hmm. well I dont see it laying around in newpkgs. > I'm not "Holding it up" as far as I'm aware. > Isn't this file in the Proto subdir ? (with a few more...) cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 22:32:48 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:32:48 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp In-Reply-To: <625385e31002190048p3c1bc418t366dc8929e5979e0@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002171033k2a4332c0sadd4583db8d47d1d@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002171208n3238e719i5ef6803a6388b0a1@mail.gmail.com> <49273.217.227.55.176.1266441071.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <625385e31002181411w106794bau8dd20cae48e7b9c1@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002181505x445953a2m6f4b4ab8046a186f@mail.gmail.com> <625385e31002190048p3c1bc418t366dc8929e5979e0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > .... > > PCP is Solaris specific and it's the first one to be packaged, isn't > it logical that the second one will have to adjust? If it ever becomes > an issue. My usual criteria for naming collision issues is not "first to package", but "which will be expected most". As such, in the rare occasions where this sort of thing has come up, it is normal to poll "other software distributions", with the largest, most public facing naming taking precedent when there is a conflict. Thus, the prior choices made by debian and *bsd actually pull more "weight", than sunfreeware choices. The rational for this, as I have hinted prior, is that the largest number of people tend to want to use our packages, to make solaris "more like other FreeNix systems", rather than to make solaris more unique to itself. Do you agree with that premise? > But none of those have Performance Co-Pilot either so who knows what > people are looking for? Umm. I'm a bit lost here . which "those" are you referring to? To take one specific counter example: Debian has "pcp-gui", which is indeed, "Performance Co-Pilot" Similarly, http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pcp.html is a "src package", but it also happens to generate libpcp... which is, again, "Performance Co-Pilot" related So, if "Debian" is counted as "one of those" it certainly has P.Co-Pilot From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 22:44:27 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:44:27 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs automake, mutt, mutt_base, mutt_ncurses, mutt_slang In-Reply-To: <201002191001.o1JA1xAW009203@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002191001.o1JA1xAW009203@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > > These are now with full alternatives support. > Fun! well, if you havent already, you'd better post something about it to the users' and announce lists now. From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 22:45:28 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:45:28 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (libfbopenssl) In-Reply-To: References: <5921A3A6-93E9-48E3-A78E-98FF0CCDFC4A@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> I could change it to "Extensions to OpenSSL including support for GSS-API >>> and SPNEGO" >> >> aha. yes I think that would help clarify it. > > The packages have been replaced with updated versions in newpkgs/. > thanks. batching From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 19 22:47:18 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:47:18 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pigz In-Reply-To: <201002191610.o1JGA9WC021651@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002191610.o1JGA9WC021651@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * pigz: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2009.09.04 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.15 > ?+ pigz-2.1.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pigz-2.1.5,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > This fixes #4268. > From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 19 22:48:10 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:48:10 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: <4B7F0269.2050207@wbonnet.net> References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> <4B7F0269.2050207@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:28 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > Hi Phil >> >> Hmm. well I dont see it laying around in newpkgs. >> I'm not "Holding it up" as far as I'm aware. >> > > Isn't this file in the Proto subdir ? (with a few more...) > oops. since the prior emails just referenced a 2010 version of the package, and the ones in the Proto dir, were all 2009... I just deleted the Proto dir :-} From william at wbonnet.net Fri Feb 19 22:51:53 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:51:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> <4B7F0269.2050207@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <4B7F07F9.1070207@wbonnet.net> Hi > since the prior emails just referenced a 2010 version of the package, > and the ones in the Proto dir, were all 2009... I just deleted the > Proto dir :-} > No problem :) I do resubmit the proto files ? cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 23:12:28 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:12:28 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pigz Message-ID: <201002192212.o1JMCOBp008711@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * pigz: patchlevel upgrade - from: 2.1.5,REV=2009.09.04 - to: 2.1.6,REV=2010.02.19 + pigz-2.1.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pigz-2.1.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Grrr... new version. -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8640 $. From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 23:53:21 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:53:21 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: <4B7F07F9.1070207@wbonnet.net> References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> <4B7F0269.2050207@wbonnet.net> <4B7F07F9.1070207@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:51 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > > I do resubmit the proto files ? > yes please (re)submit whatever packages you feel are missing. (I thought you had submitted all of them in one big go previously, and "everything" was already in now. oh well) From william at wbonnet.net Sat Feb 20 00:47:52 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:47:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> <3DABD05E-161E-44CB-B6D4-27D46B783204@wbonnet.net> <4B7F0269.2050207@wbonnet.net> <4B7F07F9.1070207@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <4B7F2328.5050609@wbonnet.net> Hi > yes please (re)submit whatever packages you feel are missing. > (I thought you had submitted all of them in one big go previously, and > "everything" was already in now. oh well) > Ok it's coming soon :) cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Sat Feb 20 11:55:42 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:55:42 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs x11_applewmproto, x11_bigreqsproto, x11_compositeproto, x11_damageproto, x11_dmxproto, x11_dri2proto, x11_fixesproto, x11_fontsproto, x11_glproto, x11_inputproto, x11_kbproto, x11_randrproto, x11_recordproto, x11_renderproto, x11_resourceproto, x11_scrnsaverproto, x11_videoproto, x11_windowswmproto, x11_xcmiscproto, x11_xextproto, x11_xf86bigfontproto, x11_xf86dgaproto, x11_xf86driproto, x11_xf86vidmodeproto, x11_xineramaproto, x11_xproto Message-ID: <201002201055.o1KAtZOi029549@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * x11_: revision upgrade - from: 2010.01.17 - to: 2010.02.20 + x11_inputproto-2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_kbproto-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_kbproto-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_randrproto-1.3.1,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_randrproto-1.3.1,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_recordproto-1.14,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_recordproto-1.14,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_renderproto-0.11,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_renderproto-0.11,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_resourceproto-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_resourceproto-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_scrnsaverproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_scrnsaverproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_videoproto-2.3.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_videoproto-2.3.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_windowswmproto-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_windowswmproto-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xcmiscproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xcmiscproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xextproto-7.1.1,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xextproto-7.1.1,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86bigfontproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86bigfontproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86dgaproto-2.1,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86dgaproto-2.1,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86driproto-2.1.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86driproto-2.1.0,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86vidmodeproto-2.3,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xf86vidmodeproto-2.3,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xineramaproto-1.2,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xineramaproto-1.2,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xproto-7.0.16,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_xproto-7.0.16,REV=2010.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * proto: revision upgrade - from: 2010.01.17 - to: 2010.02.19 + x11_applewmproto-1.4.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_applewmproto-1.4.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_bigreqsproto-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_bigreqsproto-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_compositeproto-0.4.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_compositeproto-0.4.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_damageproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_damageproto-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_dmxproto-2.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_dmxproto-2.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_dri2proto-2.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_dri2proto-2.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_fixesproto-4.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_fixesproto-4.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_fontsproto-2.1.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_fontsproto-2.1.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_glproto-1.4.10,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_glproto-1.4.10,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + x11_inputproto-2.0,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Hi I did a full rebuild of X11 proto to be sure we have a consistent set of packages. Cheers -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8650 $. From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Feb 20 19:25:06 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:25:06 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac Message-ID: <201002201825.o1KIP2mC001002@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * trac: patchlevel upgrade - from: 0.11.5,REV=2009.08.03 - to: 0.11.6,REV=2010.01.31 + trac-0.11.6,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz It fixes the problem described by pfelecan at: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-February/011362.html -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8691 $. From william at wbonnet.net Sun Feb 21 13:40:35 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:40:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs firefox_l10n_af, firefox_l10n_ar, fir(...) Message-ID: <201002211240.o1LCeZkN009970@login.bo.opencsw.org> * firefox_l10n_: new package + firefox_l10n_af-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ar-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_be-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_bg-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_bn_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ca-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_cs-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_cy-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_da-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_de-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_el-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_en_gb-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_eo-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_es_ar-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_es_es-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_et-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_eu-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_fi-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_fr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_fy_nl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ga_ie-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_gl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_gu_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_he-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_hi_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_hu-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_id-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_is-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_it-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ja-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ka-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_kn-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ko-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ku-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_lt-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_lv-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_mk-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_mn-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_mr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_nb_no-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_nl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_nn_no-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_oc-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pa_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pt_br-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pt_pt-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ro-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ru-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_si-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sk-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sq-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sv_se-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_te-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_th-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_tr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_uk-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_zh_cn-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_zh_tw-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz These packages are new. They provide l10n support to Firefox, based upon the official localization availables from MoFo. All the packages are garified and build from the same loop. So maybe it's not useful to check every packages ? Especially since TB and SM l10n are coming soon. So better save some energy for that ;) cheers W. -- Generated by submitpkg From wbonnetopencsw.org at login.bo.opencsw.org Sun Feb 21 13:05:02 2010 From: wbonnetopencsw.org at login.bo.opencsw.org (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:05:02 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs firefox_l10n_af, firefox_l10n_ar, firefox_l10n_be, firefox_l10n_bg, firefox_l10n_bn_in, firefox_l10n_ca, firefox_l10n_cs, firefox_l10n_cy, firefox_l10n_da, firefox_l10n_de, firefox_l10n_el, firefox_l10n_en_gb, firefox_l10n_eo, firefox_l10n_es_ar, firefox_l10n_es_es, firefox_l10n_et, firefox_l10n_eu, firefox_l10n_fi, firefox_l10n_fr, firefox_l10n_fy_nl, firefox_l10n_ga_ie, firefox_l10n_gl, firefox_l10n_gu_in, firefox_l10n_he, firefox_l10n_hi_in, firefox_l10n_hu, firefox_l10n_id, firefox_l10n_is, firefox_l10n_it, firefox_l10n_ja, firefox_l10n_ka, firefox_l10n_kn, firefox_l10n_ko, firefox_l10n_ku, firefox_l10n_lt, firefox_l10n_lv, firefox_l10n_mk, firefox_l10n_mn, firefox_l10n_mr, firefox_l10n_nb_no, firefox_l10n_nl, firefox_l10n_nn_no, firefox_l10n_oc, firefox_l10n_pa_in, firefox_l10n_pl, firefox_l10n_pt_br, firefox_l10n_pt_pt, firefox_l10n_ro, firefox_l10n_ru, firefox_l10n_si, firefox_l10n_sk, firefox_l10n_sl, firefox_l10n_sq, firefox_l10n_sr, firefox_l10n_sv! _se, firefox_l10n_te, firefox_l10n_th, firefox_l10n_tr, firefox_l10n_uk, firefox_l10n_zh_cn, firefox_l10n_zh_tw Message-ID: <201002211204.o1LC4s5n027973@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: firefox_l10n_ + firefox_l10n_af-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ar-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_be-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_bg-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_bn_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ca-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_cs-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_cy-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_da-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_de-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_el-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_en_gb-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_eo-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_es_ar-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_es_es-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_et-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_eu-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_fi-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_fr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_fy_nl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ga_ie-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_gl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_gu_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_he-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_hi_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_hu-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_id-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_is-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_it-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ja-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ka-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_kn-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ko-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ku-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_lt-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_lv-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_mk-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_mn-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_mr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_nb_no-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_nl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_nn_no-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_oc-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pa_in-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pt_br-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_pt_pt-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ro-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_ru-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_si-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sk-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sl-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sq-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_sv_se-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_te-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_th-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_tr-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_uk-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_zh_cn-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + firefox_l10n_zh_tw-3.0.14,REV=2010.02.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz These are new packages providing l10n support for Firefox. Each of the officialy supported l10n by MoFo is packaged (still a few unofficial missing). The packages depends on Firefox for easy installation from the command line (pkutil --install firefox_l10n_fr will install the french localized Firefox and all its dependendcies). These packages are of course garified, and all the same. So maybe you don't have to check all the 61 one :) Especially since Thunderbird and Seamonkey l10n will come soon. So better save some energy ;) cheers W. -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8691 $. From phil at bolthole.com Mon Feb 22 20:13:03 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:13:03 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac In-Reply-To: <201002201825.o1KIP2mC001002@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002201825.o1KIP2mC001002@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: grr. I hate "temporary" takeovers. But okay. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > The following package files are ready to be released: > > * trac: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 0.11.5,REV=2009.08.03 > ?- ? to: 0.11.6,REV=2010.01.31 > ?+ trac-0.11.6,REV=2010.01.31-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > It fixes the problem described by pfelecan at: > http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-February/011362.html From phil at opencsw.org Mon Feb 22 20:16:41 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:16:41 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs firefox_l10n_af, firefox_l10n_ar, fir(...) In-Reply-To: <201002211240.o1LCeZkN009970@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002211240.o1LCeZkN009970@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:40 AM, William Bonnet wrote: > *... > These packages are new. They provide l10n support to Firefox, based upon the official localization availables from MoFo. mo... fo...? Umm.. *cough*... umm... okay, i'll go with it :-} i'm just shoving these things in and not registering them with mantis. From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Feb 22 20:26:37 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:26:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Registering packages in mantis (was Re: newpkgs firefox_l10n_af, ...) Message-ID: [+maintainers, bcc:pkgsubmissions] On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:40 AM, William Bonnet wrote: >> *... >> These packages are new. They provide l10n support to Firefox, based upon the official localization availables from MoFo. > > mo... fo...? > Umm.. > > *cough*... > > umm... > > > okay, i'll go with it :-} > > > i'm just shoving these things in and not registering them with mantis. Perhaps your time is spent better doing other things and mantis registration can be offloaded to somebody else or automated? Maciej From william at wbonnet.net Mon Feb 22 21:48:56 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:48:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs firefox_l10n_af, firefox_l10n_ar, fir(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201002211240.o1LCeZkN009970@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B82EDB8.9000505@wbonnet.net> Hi >> These packages are new. They provide l10n support to Firefox, based upon the official localization availables from MoFo. >> > > mo... fo...? > Mozilla Foundation ;) cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 23 08:59:53 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:59:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac In-Reply-To: References: <201002201825.o1KIP2mC001002@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 22.02.2010 um 20:13 schrieb Philip Brown: > grr. I hate "temporary" takeovers. But okay. This will happen more often in the future with peer-maintainership. So better make a real process out of it. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Feb 23 16:24:08 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:24:08 -0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lzip, lzlib, plzip Message-ID: <201002231459.o1NExw55018199@login.bo.opencsw.org> The following package files are ready to be released: * new package: plzip + plzip-0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + plzip-0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: lzlib + lzlib-0.9,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + lzlib-0.9,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * new package: lzip + lzip-1.9,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + lzip-1.9,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz New packages. lzutils will follow after release. -- Generated by submitpkg, $Rev: 8640 $. From william at wbonnet.net Tue Feb 23 16:48:28 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:48:28 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xtrans, xpm, libxt_devel, libxt, libx(...) Message-ID: <201002231548.o1NFmSYh029249@login.bo.opencsw.org> * libxt: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.0.6,REV=2009.09.25 - to: 1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19 + libxt_devel-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxt_devel-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxt-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxt-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxext: minor version upgrade - from: 1.0.5,REV=2009.09.22 - to: 1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19 + libxext_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxext_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxext-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxext-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxaw: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.0.6,REV=2009.10.05 - to: 1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19 + libxaw_devel-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxaw_devel-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxaw-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxaw-1.0.7,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxdmcp: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.0.2,REV=2009.06.06 - to: 1.0.3,REV=2010.02.19 + libxdmcp_devel-1.0.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdmcp_devel-1.0.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdmcp-1.0.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdmcp-1.0.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libfs: new package + libfs_devel-1.0.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libfs_devel-1.0.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libfs-1.0.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libfs-1.0.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libice: revision upgrade - from: 2009.09.22 - to: 2010.02.19 + libice_devel-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libice_devel-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libice-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libice-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxrender: patchlevel upgrade - from: 0.9.4,REV=2009.06.11 - to: 0.9.5,REV=2010.02.19 + libxrender_devel-0.9.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxrender_devel-0.9.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxrender-0.9.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxrender-0.9.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libpthreadstubs: minor version upgrade - from: 0.1,REV=2009.05.29 - to: 0.3,REV=2010.02.19 + libpthreadstubs-0.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libpthreadstubs-0.3,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * xpm: patchlevel upgrade - from: 3.5.7,REV=2009.10.05 - to: 3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19 + xpm-3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xpm-3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxpm_devel-3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxpm_devel-3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxpm-3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxpm-3.5.8,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libsm: revision upgrade - from: 2009.09.23 - to: 2010.02.19 + libsm_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libsm_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libsm-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libsm-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxmu: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.0.4,REV=2009.09.25 - to: 1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19 + libxmu_devel-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmu_devel-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmu-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmu-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxau: revision upgrade - from: 2009.06.04 - to: 2010.02.19 + libxau_devel-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxau_devel-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxau-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxau-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libx11: minor version upgrade - from: 1.2.2,REV=2009.07.12 - to: 1.3.2,REV=2010.02.19 + libx11_devel-1.3.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libx11_devel-1.3.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libx11-1.3.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libx11-1.3.2,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * xtrans: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.3,REV=2009.05.29 - to: 1.2.5,REV=2010.02.19 + xtrans-1.2.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xtrans-1.2.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxfixes: new package + libxfixes_devel-4.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxfixes_devel-4.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxfixes-4.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxfixes-4.0.4,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libfontenc: new package + libfontenc_devel-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libfontenc_devel-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libfontenc-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libfontenc-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxkbfile: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.0.5,REV=2009.09.22 - to: 1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19 + libxkbfile_devel-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxkbfile_devel-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxkbfile-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxkbfile-1.0.6,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxft2: patchlevel upgrade - from: 2.1.13,REV=2009.06.15 - to: 2.1.14,REV=2010.02.19 + libxft2_devel-2.1.14,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxft2_devel-2.1.14,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxft2-2.1.14,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxft2-2.1.14,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Hi This is the first part (o two) of X11R7.5 release. I need these packages to be pushed out before i can build the rest of the libs. The libs to come have already been built on testing machines cheers W. -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at opencsw.org Tue Feb 23 18:53:26 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:53:26 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac In-Reply-To: References: <201002201825.o1KIP2mC001002@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 22.02.2010 um 20:13 schrieb Philip Brown: >> >> grr. I hate "temporary" takeovers. ?But okay. > > This will happen more often in the future with peer-maintainership. > So better make a real process out of it. > This blew things up. I'm not feeling very good about this "happening more often". From phil at bolthole.com Tue Feb 23 19:03:47 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:03:47 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xtrans, xpm, libxt_devel, libxt, libx(...) In-Reply-To: <201002231548.o1NFmSYh029249@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002231548.o1NFmSYh029249@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: blargle. okay, that lot is in batch From william at wbonnet.net Tue Feb 23 21:27:44 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:27:44 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac In-Reply-To: References: <201002201825.o1KIP2mC001002@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B843A40.20807@wbonnet.net> Hi Phil > This blew things up. > I'm not feeling very good about this "happening more often". > Sorry but it will... For several reasons : a/ Teams b/ Courtesy releases between active maintainers (update without declaring official teams) c/ Updates of orphaned packages d/ answer d cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Tue Feb 23 21:28:21 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:28:21 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xtrans, xpm, libxt_devel, libxt, libx(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201002231548.o1NFmSYh029249@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B843A65.5010102@wbonnet.net> Hi Phil > okay, that lot is in batch > Sorry catching up on late work ;) cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From ellson at opencsw.org Tue Feb 23 21:40:25 2010 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:40:25 -0500 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs swig Message-ID: <4B843D39.6010705@opencsw.org> * swig: minor version upgrade - from: swig-1.3.39 - to: swig-1.3.40 + swig-1.3.40,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + swig-1.3.40,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz John Ellson From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 11:48:14 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:48:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs zutils Message-ID: <201002241048.o1OAmEW0028790@login.bo.opencsw.org> * zutils: new package + zutils-0.7,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + zutils-0.7,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 15:06:01 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:06:01 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs doxygen, doxygen_doc Message-ID: <201002241406.o1OE61YP011725@login.bo.opencsw.org> * doxygen: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.6.1,REV=2009.11.08 - to: 1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24 + doxygen-1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + doxygen-1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + doxygen_doc-1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz Version bump after patch has been accepted upstream. Now builds cleanly. -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 15:43:02 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:43:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xz, lzma Message-ID: <201002241443.o1OEh2B7005537@login.bo.opencsw.org> * lzma: minor version upgrade - from: 4.32.7,REV=2008.11.24 - to: 4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24 + lzma-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * xz: new package + xz-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xz-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz xz is the successor of lzma, which also implements all old commands. lzma deprecated and takeover from Oliver P. Kiddle confirmed. Thanks go Rupert for the intital GAR Makefile :-) -- Generated by submitpkg From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 16:14:14 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:14:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pysetuptools Message-ID: <201002241514.o1OFEEmh026926@login.bo.opencsw.org> To fix the dependency problem with trac. The other problem is probably with the trac package itself. It won't things any worse, at least. * pysetuptools: minor version upgrade - from: 0.6,REV=2009.08.12_rev=c9 - to: 0.6c11,REV=2010.02.23 + pysetuptools-0.6c11,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 18:10:08 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:10:08 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pysetuptools In-Reply-To: <201002241514.o1OFEEmh026926@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002241514.o1OFEEmh026926@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > To fix the dependency problem with trac. ?The other problem is probably with > the trac package itself. ?It won't things any worse, at least. > > * pysetuptools: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 0.6,REV=2009.08.12_rev=c9 > ?- ? to: 0.6c11,REV=2010.02.23 > ?+ pysetuptools-0.6c11,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 20:40:37 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:40:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mysql5rt Message-ID: <201002241940.o1OJebh2017418@login.bo.opencsw.org> Corrects the symlink needed for older apps to find the mysql shared libraries. * mysql5rt: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.08 - to: 2010.02.19 + mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 21:33:33 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:33:33 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mysql5rt In-Reply-To: <201002241940.o1OJebh2017418@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002241940.o1OJebh2017418@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: thanks. batched. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > Corrects the symlink needed for older apps to find the mysql shared libraries. > > * mysql5rt: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2010.02.08 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.19 > ?+ mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ mysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.02.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 24 21:35:11 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:35:11 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs swig In-Reply-To: <4B843D39.6010705@opencsw.org> References: <4B843D39.6010705@opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:40 PM, John Ellson wrote: > * swig: minor version upgrade > ?- from: swig-1.3.39 > ?- ? to: swig-1.3.40 > ?+ swig-1.3.40,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ swig-1.3.40,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 21:36:16 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:36:16 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs zutils In-Reply-To: <201002241048.o1OAmEW0028790@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002241048.o1OAmEW0028790@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * zutils: new package > ?+ zutils-0.7,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ zutils-0.7,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- Errr.. WHY do we want this? seems like "Yet Another implementation of..." the stuff that already comes with GNU tools. 1 f none /opt/csw/bin/Zcat 0755 root bin 3394 4146 1267007705 1 f none /opt/csw/bin/Zcmp 0755 root bin 85 6292 1267007705 1 f none /opt/csw/bin/Zdiff 0755 root bin 4685 36088 1267007705 .... From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 21:37:31 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:37:31 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs doxygen, doxygen_doc In-Reply-To: <201002241406.o1OE61YP011725@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002241406.o1OE61YP011725@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * doxygen: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.6.1,REV=2009.11.08 > ?- ? to: 1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24 > ?+ doxygen-1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ doxygen-1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ doxygen_doc-1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > Version bump after patch has been accepted upstream. Now builds cleanly. > excellent! batched From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 24 22:15:31 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:15:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxxf86vm_devel, libxxf86vm, libxxf8(...) Message-ID: <201002242115.o1OLFVJV021704@login.bo.opencsw.org> * libxv: major version upgrade - from: 6.8.1 - to: 1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24 + libxv-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxv-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxxf86dga: new package + libxxf86dga_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxxf86dga_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxxf86dga-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxxf86dga-1.1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxrandr: new package + libxrandr_devel-1.3.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxrandr_devel-1.3.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxrandr-1.3.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxrandr-1.3.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxscrnsaver: new package + libxscrnsaver_devel-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxscrnsaver_devel-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxscrnsaver-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxscrnsaver-1.2.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxinerama: new package + libxinerama_devel-1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxinerama_devel-1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxinerama-1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxinerama-1.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxdamage: new package + libxdamage_devel-1.1.2,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdamage_devel-1.1.2,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdamage-1.1.2,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdamage-1.1.2,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxfont: new package + libxfont_devel-1.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxfont_devel-1.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxfont-1.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxfont-1.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * lib: new package + libxxf86vm_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxxf86vm_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxxf86vm-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxxf86vm-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libdmx_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libdmx_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libdmx-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libdmx-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxi: new package + libxi_devel-1.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxi_devel-1.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxi-1.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxi-1.3,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxcomposite_devel: new package + libxcomposite_devel-0.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxcomposite_devel-0.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libx: new package + libxv_devel-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxv_devel-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxres_devel-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxres_devel-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxres-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxres-1.0.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxcomposite: major version upgrade - from: 7.0,REV=2006.04.28 - to: 0.4.1,REV=2010.02.24 + libxcomposite-0.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxcomposite-0.4.1,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxcursor: new package + libxcursor_devel-1.1.10,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxcursor_devel-1.1.10,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxcursor-1.1.10,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxcursor-1.1.10,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Hi, This the second part of X11 submission. There will be a last submission since two libs are missing from this list. Cheers W. -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 23:00:00 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:00:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lzo Message-ID: <201002242200.o1OM0084007401@login.bo.opencsw.org> * lzo: minor version upgrade - from: 2.3,REV=2009.02.26 - to: 2.03,REV=2010.02.24 + lzo-2.03,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + lzo-2.03,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 23:06:49 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:06:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs zutils In-Reply-To: References: <201002241048.o1OAmEW0028790@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <9D0E7857-22FB-403C-912E-8C69D361DCBA@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 24.02.2010 um 21:36 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> * zutils: new package >> + zutils-0.7,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + zutils-0.7,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> -- > > Errr.. WHY do we want this? > seems like "Yet Another implementation of..." the stuff that already > comes with GNU tools. > > 1 f none /opt/csw/bin/Zcat 0755 root bin 3394 4146 1267007705 > 1 f none /opt/csw/bin/Zcmp 0755 root bin 85 6292 1267007705 > 1 f none /opt/csw/bin/Zdiff 0755 root bin 4685 36088 1267007705 > .... It is not. The gzip tools support compress and gzip. This implementation support every current compression method including lzma, 7zip and xz. They work similar, hence the similar name. Best regards -- Dago From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 23:11:51 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:11:51 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xz, lzma In-Reply-To: <201002241443.o1OEh2B7005537@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002241443.o1OEh2B7005537@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * lzma: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 4.32.7,REV=2008.11.24 > ?- ? to: 4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24 > ?+ lzma-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * xz: new package > ?+ xz-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ xz-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > xz is the successor of lzma, which also implements all old commands. > lzma deprecated and takeover from Oliver P. Kiddle confirmed. > Thanks go Rupert for the intital GAR Makefile :-) > urrrr... I'd usually toss back a beta, but since it's been out for 6 months.. all right then :-) (thats stilll a really really disgusting version number. ugh) From phil at bolthole.com Wed Feb 24 23:14:33 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:14:33 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxxf86vm_devel, libxxf86vm, libxxf8(...) In-Reply-To: <201002242115.o1OLFVJV021704@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002242115.o1OLFVJV021704@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hmm. i notice two bugs in submitpkg, since it described packages of "lib:" and "libx:". but at least the rest of the output was clear. batching. From phil at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 23:22:59 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:22:59 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs zutils In-Reply-To: <9D0E7857-22FB-403C-912E-8C69D361DCBA@opencsw.org> References: <201002241048.o1OAmEW0028790@login.bo.opencsw.org> <9D0E7857-22FB-403C-912E-8C69D361DCBA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> .... > > It is not. The gzip tools support compress and gzip. This implementation > support every current compression method including lzma, 7zip and xz. > They work similar, hence the similar name. > aha. thanks for the clarification. batching From jon at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 23:28:09 2010 From: jon at opencsw.org (Jon Green) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:28:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xz, lzma In-Reply-To: References: <201002241443.o1OEh2B7005537@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B85A7F9.3070509@opencsw.org> Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> * lzma: minor version upgrade >> - from: 4.32.7,REV=2008.11.24 >> - to: 4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24 >> + lzma-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> * xz: new package >> + xz-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + xz-4.999.9beta,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> xz is the successor of lzma, which also implements all old commands. >> lzma deprecated and takeover from Oliver P. Kiddle confirmed. >> Thanks go Rupert for the intital GAR Makefile :-) >> > > > urrrr... I'd usually toss back a beta, but since it's been out for 6 > months.. all right then :-) > xz - great! Certainly should not toss this back as Beta! I was considering packaging this myself so thanks for saving me some work. Regards Jon. > (thats stilll a really really disgusting version number. ugh) > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 16:32:35 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:32:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netjabber, pm_netxmpp, pm_soaplite(...) Message-ID: <201002251532.o1PFWZ1N022142@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_xmlstream: new package + pm_xmlstream-1.23,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * pm_soaplite: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.03 - to: 2010.02.25 + pm_soaplite-0.710.10,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * pm_netxmpp: new package + pm_netxmpp-1.02,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * pm_netjabber: new package + pm_netjabber-2.0,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz Update of SOAP::Lite with one more dependency. -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 16:43:07 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:43:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gm4 Message-ID: <201002251543.o1PFh7Lh018186@login.bo.opencsw.org> * gm4: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.4.13,REV=2009.04.01 - to: 1.4.14,REV=2010.02.25 + gm4-1.4.14,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + gm4-1.4.14,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 17:28:11 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:11 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tcpwrappers Message-ID: <201002251628.o1PGSB8a018490@login.bo.opencsw.org> * tcpwrappers: revision number added upgrade - from: - to: ipv6.4 + tcpwrappers-7.6,REV=2010.02.12_rev=ipv6.4-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + tcpwrappers-7.6,REV=2010.02.12_rev=ipv6.4-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 19:00:05 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:00:05 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils, protobuf, nss, icon_naming(...) Message-ID: <201002251800.o1PI059W015697@login.bo.opencsw.org> * nss: new package Network Security Services. This build was consulted with a NSS developer (Wan-Teh Chang). Rupert has recently asked for it, I think it's a good time to release it. + nss-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + nss-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * icon_naming_utils: new package One of the leaves of evince's dependency tree. + icon_naming_utils-0.8.90,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * protobuf: new package Google C++/Python/Java serialization libarary. + protobuf-2.3.0,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + protobuf-2.3.0,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * sharutils: new package Doesn't need introduction. + sharutils-4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + sharutils-4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 20:14:00 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:14:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac, pysetuptools Message-ID: <201002251914.o1PJE05o007590@login.bo.opencsw.org> Fixes issues discovered by Peter Felecan. * trac: revision upgrade - from: 2010.01.31 - to: 2010.02.24 + trac-0.11.6,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz * pysetuptools: revision upgrade - from: 2010.02.23 - to: 2010.02.25 + pysetuptools-0.6c11,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 20:59:36 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:59:36 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gm4 In-Reply-To: <201002251543.o1PFh7Lh018186@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002251543.o1PFh7Lh018186@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * gm4: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.4.13,REV=2009.04.01 > ?- ? to: 1.4.14,REV=2010.02.25 > ?+ gm4-1.4.14,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ gm4-1.4.14,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 25 21:00:23 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:00:23 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netjabber, pm_netxmpp, pm_soaplite(...) In-Reply-To: <201002251532.o1PFWZ1N022142@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002251532.o1PFWZ1N022142@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: okay On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * pm_xmlstream: new package > ?+ pm_xmlstream-1.23,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * pm_soaplite: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2010.02.03 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.25 > ?+ pm_soaplite-0.710.10,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * pm_netxmpp: new package > ?+ pm_netxmpp-1.02,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * pm_netjabber: new package > ?+ pm_netjabber-2.0,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > Update of SOAP::Lite with one more dependency. > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 25 21:01:29 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:01:29 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: <201002251628.o1PGSB8a018490@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002251628.o1PGSB8a018490@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * tcpwrappers: revision number added upgrade > ?- from: > ?- ? to: ipv6.4 > ?+ tcpwrappers-7.6,REV=2010.02.12_rev=ipv6.4-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ tcpwrappers-7.6,REV=2010.02.12_rev=ipv6.4-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > i vaguely recall that adding ipv6 support can make some systems "unhappy". Have you tested on non-ipv6 systems? From phil at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 21:02:30 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:02:30 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs trac, pysetuptools In-Reply-To: <201002251914.o1PJE05o007590@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002251914.o1PJE05o007590@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: great. added. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > Fixes issues discovered by Peter Felecan. > > * trac: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2010.01.31 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.24 > ?+ trac-0.11.6,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * pysetuptools: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2010.02.23 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.25 > ?+ pysetuptools-0.6c11,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 25 21:05:41 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:05:41 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils, protobuf, nss, icon_naming(...) In-Reply-To: <201002251800.o1PI059W015697@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002251800.o1PI059W015697@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: This stuff ok. nss comments split out. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > > > * icon_naming_utils: new package > ?One of the leaves of evince's dependency tree. > ?+ icon_naming_utils-0.8.90,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * protobuf: new package > ?Google C++/Python/Java serialization libarary. > ?+ protobuf-2.3.0,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ protobuf-2.3.0,REV=2010.02.23-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * sharutils: new package > ?Doesn't need introduction. > ?+ sharutils-4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ sharutils-4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Feb 25 21:16:33 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:16:33 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Maciej Blizinski wrote: > * nss: new package > ?Network Security Services. ?This build was consulted with a NSS developer > ?(Wan-Teh Chang). ?Rupert has recently asked for it, I think it's a good time > ?to release it. > ?+ nss-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ nss-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > Two things concern me about this package. wait, make that 3. wait.. erm... "a bunch" ;-/ 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? 2. it delivers /opt/csw/lib/libssl3.so The potential for conflicting (at some nebulous point in the future) against openssl.. which delivers /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so ... worries me. This is an open-ended concern. I dont have any particular solutions to suggest..I'm just bringing it out in the open, to see whether other people share my concern on this, and/or have specific reasons why it should NOT be a concern. This might even be better moved to maintainers for more detailed discussion. But since there are other issues, i'll leave it here for now -} 3. /opt/csw/lib/libnss3.so Isnt this the same thing that firefox/mozilla/whatever uses? If so, should we not split out a separate runtime package for the shared libs, so it can use them more cleanly? Or does it actually use the executables as well? 4. naming. Comparing with "other distributions", they seem to have named relevant things "libnss3". Well, actually, "libnss3", and "libnss3-tools". Should we follow suit? From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 23:17:57 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:17:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: <201002251628.o1PGSB8a018490@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <8F0FE7DF-75FF-4D54-B05C-891C9C28B7EA@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 25.02.2010 um 21:01 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> * tcpwrappers: revision number added upgrade >> - from: >> - to: ipv6.4 >> + tcpwrappers-7.6,REV=2010.02.12_rev=ipv6.4-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + tcpwrappers-7.6,REV=2010.02.12_rev=ipv6.4-SunOS5.8-sparc- >> CSW.pkg.gz > > i vaguely recall that adding ipv6 support can make some systems > "unhappy". > > Have you tested on non-ipv6 systems? No, but I'll give it a try. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 11:10:36 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:10:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xmlparser Message-ID: <201002261010.o1QAAa82006561@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_xmlparser: minor version upgrade - from: 2.34,REV=2004.03.06 - to: 2.36,REV=2010.02.26 + pm_xmlparser-2.36,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_xmlparser-2.36,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 16:12:07 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:12:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs argtable, lynx Message-ID: <201002261512.o1QFC7Vh005713@login.bo.opencsw.org> * lynx: patchlevel upgrade - from: 2.8.6,REV=2007.07.29 - to: 2.8.7,REV=2010.02.26 + lynx-2.8.7,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + lynx-2.8.7,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * argtable: new package + argtable-2.12,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + argtable-2.12,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 17:49:51 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:49:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs neon, neon_devel, neon_full Message-ID: <201002261649.o1QGnpIt022658@login.bo.opencsw.org> First version with minimal/full alternative. * neon: revision upgrade - from: 2010.01.19 - to: 2010.02.25 + neon-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + neon-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + neon_devel-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + neon_devel-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * neon_full: new package + neon_full-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + neon_full-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From skayser at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 17:59:56 2010 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:59:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_lxml Message-ID: <201002261659.o1QGxu4Y006448@login.bo.opencsw.org> Hi Phil, * py_lxml: new package + py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz lxml is a Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries. Sebastian -- Generated by submitpkg From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 19:39:02 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:39:02 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a > significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, > for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are > processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? This comes in GAR for free, by default, when you build 64-bit applications. Is there a reason to disable it? > 2. it delivers /opt/csw/lib/libssl3.so > ?The potential for conflicting (at some nebulous point in the future) > against openssl.. which delivers > ? /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so ... worries me. > > ?This is an open-ended concern. I dont have any particular solutions > to suggest..I'm just bringing it out in the open, to see whether other > people share my concern on this, and/or have specific reasons why it > should NOT be a concern. I spoke with the developer, and what NSS guys do, is they use the appended number instead of SONAMEs. Don't ask me, why. If they need to change the API, they'll create libssl4.so. > 3. /opt/csw/lib/libnss3.so > > ?Isnt this the same thing that firefox/mozilla/whatever uses? If so, > should we not split out a separate > ?runtime package for the shared libs, so it can use them more cleanly? > Or does it actually use the executables as well? It doesn't use executables. I'm splitting the package. > 4. naming. > Comparing with "other distributions", they seem to have named relevant > things "libnss3". > Well, actually, "libnss3", and "libnss3-tools". > > Should we follow suit? We should. Done. From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 19:40:07 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:40:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnss3, libnss3_devel, libnss3_tools Message-ID: <201002261840.o1QIe7WO015136@login.bo.opencsw.org> Updated NSS packages, implementing suggestions from yesterday. * libnss3: new package + libnss3-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnss3-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libnss3_devel-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnss3_devel-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libnss3_tools-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnss3_tools-3.12.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 20:23:41 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:23:41 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a >> significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, >> for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are >> processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? > > This comes in GAR for free, by default, when you build 64-bit > applications. ?Is there a reason to disable it? well, that was not my question. My question was really, "why are you building 64bit applications"? :) Extrapolating a bit, I guess what is going on, is that 1. You decided to build 64-bit libraries as well as 32bit libraries. very nice, I certainly approve of that ;-) However, this had a side effect of 2. gar "decided", since you want 64bit libraries, you also want 64bit executables to go along with them. But is that an actual benefit in this case? I'm thinking not. I'm also thinking, since you bring GAR up, that perhaps we should have some kind of gar default for "when doing a combined 32bit/64bit build, default to libs only, for 64bit" This may or may not make more sense if the maintainer has split the package up into "libs" vs "other stuff". Dont know if you want to factor that into the decision, or whether you want to just attempt to default to the above, reguardless. What do you think? PS: thanks for splitting it up. From phil at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 20:25:42 2010 From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:25:42 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xmlparser In-Reply-To: <201002261010.o1QAAa82006561@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002261010.o1QAAa82006561@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batching On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * pm_xmlparser: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 2.34,REV=2004.03.06 > ?- ? to: 2.36,REV=2010.02.26 > ?+ pm_xmlparser-2.36,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pm_xmlparser-2.36,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 21:31:13 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:31:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3C1B4D19-37E8-4192-B51B-1937B7E6A053@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 26.02.2010 um 19:39 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Philip Brown > wrote: >> 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a >> significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, >> for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are >> processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? > > This comes in GAR for free, by default, when you build 64-bit > applications. Is there a reason to disable it? Yes. If the application doesn't benefit from 64 bit in terms of speed or memory it is best practice to not ship 64 bit binaries. Shipping 64 bit binaries with isaexec can easily be turned of with NOISAEXEC = 1 MERGE_DIRS_isa-extra = $(libdir) Personally I tend to stick with the default to make full 64 bit. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 21:33:32 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:33:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <55230544-7604-4B94-895D-284179E98EC6@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 26.02.2010 um 20:23 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Philip Brown >> wrote: >>> 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a >>> significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, >>> for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are >>> processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? >> >> This comes in GAR for free, by default, when you build 64-bit >> applications. Is there a reason to disable it? > > well, that was not my question. My question was really, "why are you > building 64bit applications"? :) > > Extrapolating a bit, I guess what is going on, is that > > 1. You decided to build 64-bit libraries as well as 32bit libraries. > very nice, I certainly approve of that ;-) > However, this had a side effect of > > 2. gar "decided", since you want 64bit libraries, you also want 64bit > executables to go along with them. > > But is that an actual benefit in this case? > > I'm thinking not. Probably yes (means: I also think not). > I'm also thinking, since you bring GAR up, that perhaps we should have > some kind of gar default for > "when doing a combined 32bit/64bit build, default to libs only, for > 64bit" > > This may or may not make more sense if the maintainer has split the > package up into "libs" vs "other stuff". > Dont know if you want to factor that into the decision, or whether you > want to just attempt to default to the above, reguardless. > > What do you think? Well, personally I like the default as it is now, but I am open for discussion. What I don't like is that changing the default would mean adjusting lots of Makefiles. Best regards -- Dago From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 26 21:48:01 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:48:01 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] argtable Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > * argtable: new package > ?+ argtable-2.12,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ argtable-2.12,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > NAME=argtable - Parsing GNU style command line options with a minimum of fuss so.... isnt this like gnugetopt or whatever? why do we need/want a clone of that? something requires it as a dependency? From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 21:58:39 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:58:39 -0500 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] argtable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Feb 26 15:48:01 -0500 2010: > so.... isnt this like gnugetopt or whatever? why do we need/want a > clone of that? Why wouldn't we? Is offering the package inherently bad? Choice is good! :) -Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 22:05:37 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:05:37 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] argtable In-Reply-To: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <51F746B7-E4B6-4C02-A638-271B030D7E33@opencsw.org> Hi Ben, Am 26.02.2010 um 21:58 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Feb 26 15:48:01 -0500 > 2010: >> so.... isnt this like gnugetopt or whatever? why do we need/want a >> clone of that? > > Why wouldn't we? Is offering the package inherently bad? Choice is > good! :) It was just released on SFW and I am trying to follow as close as possible. Usually their decision of cool stuff is not bad. Best regards -- Dago From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 26 22:09:49 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:09:49 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs neon, neon_devel, neon_full In-Reply-To: <201002261649.o1QGnpIt022658@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002261649.o1QGnpIt022658@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > First version with minimal/full alternative. > > * neon: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2010.01.19 > ?- ? to: 2010.02.25 > ?+ neon-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ neon-0.29.3,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz okay From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 26 22:18:30 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:18:30 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] argtable In-Reply-To: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Feb 26 15:48:01 -0500 2010: > >> so.... isnt this like gnugetopt or whatever? why do we need/want a >> clone of that? > > Why wouldn't we? ?Is offering the package inherently bad? ?Choice is > good! :) > do you have any idea how many "open source text editors" there are out there? choice is NOT always good :) [Dagobert wrote] >It was just released on SFW and I am trying to follow as close as possible. Eh.. lets figure out reasons why it should be added? I'm not saying strictly "no", I'm just saying "lets be clear on why". That way, if those reasons change or become invalid, then we know it's okay to ditch it down the road. From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 26 22:36:31 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:36:31 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_lxml In-Reply-To: <201002261659.o1QGxu4Y006448@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201002261659.o1QGxu4Y006448@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > Hi Phil, > > * py_lxml: new package > ?+ py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > lxml is a Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries. > thanks.. erm.. i'm confused though. we already have py_libxml2-2.7.6,REV=2009.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ? From rupert at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 22:36:28 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:36:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] argtable In-Reply-To: References: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <6af4271002261336x1fc4a645p9033ec716812af29@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 22:18, Philip Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Feb 26 15:48:01 -0500 2010: > > > >> so.... isnt this like gnugetopt or whatever? why do we need/want a > >> clone of that? > > > > Why wouldn't we? Is offering the package inherently bad? Choice is > > good! :) > > > > do you have any idea how many "open source text editors" there are out > there? > > choice is NOT always good :) > > [Dagobert wrote] > >It was just released on SFW and I am trying to follow as close as > possible. > > Eh.. lets figure out reasons why it should be added? > I'm not saying strictly "no", I'm just saying "lets be clear on why". > That way, if those reasons change or become invalid, then we know it's > okay to ditch it down the road. > > is there a possibility to find out how many debian or ubuntu packages depend on argtable, or which ones? rupert. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 26 22:47:34 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:47:34 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] argtable In-Reply-To: <6af4271002261336x1fc4a645p9033ec716812af29@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267217846-sup-6189@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <6af4271002261336x1fc4a645p9033ec716812af29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:36 PM, rupert THURNER wrote: > >> Eh.. lets figure out reasons why it should be added? >> I'm not saying strictly "no", I'm just saying "lets be clear on why". >> That way, if those reasons change or become invalid, then we know it's >> okay to ditch it down the road. >> > > is there a possibility to find out how many debian or ubuntu packages depend > on argtable, or which ones? > good suggestion. Hmm.. I dont know how to find the answer to that. However, I did stumble upon http://www.gnu.org/software/autogen/compare.html oh Good Grief, this is nuts. 9 different "arg parsing libraries". and that's in just the "free software" space. (btw, argtable appears to offer nothing of significance, featurewise, according to the the comparison page) If we decide to package something that actually USES this thing, then I'm okay with adding it in. Until then, not. Just say no to clutter. From skayser at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 22:51:50 2010 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:51:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_lxml In-Reply-To: References: <201002261659.o1QGxu4Y006448@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B884276.1050600@opencsw.org> Philip Brown wrote on 26.02.2010 22:36: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >> * py_lxml: new package >> + py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> lxml is a Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries. >> > > thanks.. erm.. i'm confused though. we already have > py_libxml2-2.7.6,REV=2009.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz The ones that we already have are the native bindings which ship with libxml2. lxml aims to be easier to deal with. Announcement (from back in 2005) and their website: http://www.mail-archive.com/xml at gnome.org/msg00684.html http://codespeak.net/lxml/ I already use lxml for the IRC bot which is sitting on #opencsw and as I am no programmer (not to speak of XML), it is easy to deal with ;) Sebastian From phil at bolthole.com Fri Feb 26 23:09:06 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:09:06 -0800 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_lxml In-Reply-To: <4B884276.1050600@opencsw.org> References: <201002261659.o1QGxu4Y006448@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4B884276.1050600@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > Philip Brown wrote on 26.02.2010 22:36: >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >>> * py_lxml: new package >>> ?+ py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >>> ?+ py_lxml-2.2.4,REV=2010.02.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >>> >>> lxml is a Pythonic binding for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries. >>> >> >> thanks.. erm.. i'm confused though. we already have >> py_libxml2-2.7.6,REV=2009.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > The ones that we already have are the native bindings which ship with > libxml2. lxml aims to be easier to deal with. aha, gotcha :) how about tweaking the NAME field to be a bit more descriptive of that then. eg: NAME=py_lxml - alternative libxml2 binding that is easier to use than py_libxml2 From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 00:36:22 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:36:22 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: <55230544-7604-4B94-895D-284179E98EC6@opencsw.org> References: <55230544-7604-4B94-895D-284179E98EC6@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 26.02.2010 um 20:23 schrieb Philip Brown: >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >>>> >>>> 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a >>>> significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, >>>> for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are >>>> processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? >>> >>> This comes in GAR for free, by default, when you build 64-bit >>> applications. ?Is there a reason to disable it? >> >> well, that was not my question. My question was really, "why are you >> building 64bit applications"? :) >> >> Extrapolating a bit, I guess what is going on, is that >> >> 1. You decided to build 64-bit libraries as well as 32bit libraries. >> very nice, I certainly approve of that ;-) >> However, this had a side effect of >> >> 2. gar "decided", since you want 64bit libraries, you also want 64bit >> executables to go along with them. >> >> But is that an actual benefit in this case? >> >> I'm thinking not. > > Probably yes (means: I also think not). What level of resource consumption difference are we talking about here? Do you have any figures, like bytes or running time miliseconds? Is it worth using time (=money) pushing back on this package as it is right now? From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 03:11:49 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:11:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, gitk, git_gui, git_emacs, git_sv(...) Message-ID: <201002270211.o1R2Bn2v013865@login.bo.opencsw.org> * git: minor version upgrade - from: 1.6.6,REV=2010.01.07 - to: 1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15 + git-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + git-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + gitk-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_gui-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_emacs-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_svn-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_doc-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_completion-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_cvs-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + git_devel-1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 14:10:00 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:10:00 +0000 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > 1. You decided to build 64-bit libraries as well as 32bit libraries. > very nice, I certainly approve of that ;-) Cool, I guess we can constrain the 64/32 bit discussion to the CSWlibnss3-tools package. Are CSWlibnss3 and CSWlibnss3-devel OK? From dam at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 14:43:12 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:43:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] nss In-Reply-To: References: <55230544-7604-4B94-895D-284179E98EC6@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <3A8672F3-F845-46DA-9119-D00599E5F3B1@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 27.02.2010 um 00:36 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Am 26.02.2010 um 20:23 schrieb Philip Brown: >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 1. why are we using libexec, for certificate utilities? Is there a >>>>> significant performance gain, and why do we CARE about performance, >>>>> for certificate utilities? surely it wont matter unless you are >>>>> processing thousands a minute, or something? what does that?? >>>> >>>> This comes in GAR for free, by default, when you build 64-bit >>>> applications. Is there a reason to disable it? >>> >>> well, that was not my question. My question was really, "why are you >>> building 64bit applications"? :) >>> >>> Extrapolating a bit, I guess what is going on, is that >>> >>> 1. You decided to build 64-bit libraries as well as 32bit libraries. >>> very nice, I certainly approve of that ;-) >>> However, this had a side effect of >>> >>> 2. gar "decided", since you want 64bit libraries, you also want 64bit >>> executables to go along with them. >>> >>> But is that an actual benefit in this case? >>> >>> I'm thinking not. >> >> Probably yes (means: I also think not). > > What level of resource consumption difference are we talking about > here? Do you have any figures, like bytes or running time > miliseconds? Is it worth using time (=money) pushing back on this > package as it is right now? Removing isaexec is of severity "Tweak" I would say. I'd recommend putting the two lines in the GAR Makefile so it gets cleaned up on next release and push it as is as it works 100% fine. Best regards -- Dago From hson at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 22:21:50 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:21:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs Message-ID: <4B898CEE.4060601@opencsw.org> ilmbase: 64-bit build and split package ilmbase-1.0.1,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz ilmbase-1.0.1,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ilmbase_devel-1.0.1,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz ilmbase_devel-1.0.1,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From hson at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 22:38:49 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:38:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsoup Message-ID: <4B8990E9.9010403@opencsw.org> libsoup: Update to 2.26, split package. libsoup2 is just for keeping dependency chain intact, when dependents are rebuild libsoup2 will be scrapped. libsoup includes old libraries for backward compatibility. libsoup-2.26.3,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libsoup-2.26.3,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libsoup2-2.26.3,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz libsoup_devel-2.26.3,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libsoup_devel-2.26.3,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libsoup_doc-2.26.3,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz From hson at opencsw.org Sat Feb 27 23:35:37 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:35:37 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs wmf Message-ID: <4B899E39.9090209@opencsw.org> wmf: Split package, 64-bit build libwmf-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libwmf-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libwmf_devel-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libwmf_devel-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libwmf_doc-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz libwmf_gtk-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libwmf_gtk-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz wmf-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz wmf-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz wmf_fonts-0.2.8.4,REV=2010.02.27-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz From william at wbonnet.net Sun Feb 28 02:29:50 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:29:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pixman Message-ID: <201002280129.o1S1ToDP026776@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pixman: minor version upgrade - from: 0.15.8,REV=2009.06.02 - to: 0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25 + pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sun Feb 28 03:19:48 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:19:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxtst, libxtst_devel, libxvmc, libx(...) Message-ID: <201002280219.o1S2Jm5B020828@login.bo.opencsw.org> * libxtst: new package + libxtst-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxtst-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxtst_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxtst_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libxvmc: new package + libxvmc-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxvmc-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxvmc_devel-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxvmc_devel-1.0.5,REV=2010.02.28-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Hi, this is the last part of X11 update. cheers W. -- Generated by submitpkg