[csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) dnstop, pcp

[Peter Bonivart]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> I hope it's okay to jump in here. Please, please, noooooooooooo. In my
> experience those disparate pkg and catalog names are a common cause of
> confusion for most people, in particular newcomers. If we want to avoid
> PCP because of name clashes, how about pidconport/CSWpidconport (and PCP
> in the description string)? I realize, that it then doesn't have pcp in
> either string any more (and thus can't be found with -a), but those
> different pkg / catalog names are such a pain.

So what choices do we have?

CSWpcp / pcp
CSWpcp / pidconport
CSWpidconport / pidconport

I thought we liked short names, in this case it's called pcp by its
author as well so it's no freakish abbreviation I came up with. I
could go with the last one as well but I think users will look for
pcp, not for pidconport.

-- 
/peter