[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_lxml

[Philip Brown]

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Sebastian Kayser wrote on 01.03.2010 21:10:
>>
>> The "easier to use" was my interpretation, probably some people might
>> find it easier to do this stuff with the native libxml2 python bindings.

Makes sense to me.

fine with me. but
>> The "pythonic" in the current description is what lxml is in fact about,
>> provide bindings for python that feel like python.
>>....
>
>  What is Pythonic?
>  http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/200.....


If something needs a web reference to explain it, it is probably not
the best choice to use in a single-line description meant for general
users to read :-}


How about this:


NAME=py_lxml - libxml2 binding with cleaner python syntax than py_libxml2


?