[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnet, libnet1, libnet_devel

[Philip Brown]

Two comments:

1. the SONAME is libnet.so.1
  Why do you then provide a symlink
 /opt/csw/lib/libnet.so=libnet.so.1.0.2
It would seem to be completely unneccessary.

2. Given that this is a "lib" package... having "lib_devel" would seem
to be redundant.
What do you think of my addendum to the wiki proposal, where for
'lib*' packages specifically, we just put the "devel" stuff in the
straight "lib" package?

So, overall what I am suggesting to you, is:
- move contents of libnet_devel into libnet
- remove libnet.so.1.0.2 symlink entirely.

comments?



On 11/17/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This is the long-awaited update of libnet rework. For the layout details
> please see
>   http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-libnet
>
> Best regards
>
>   -- Dago
>
> * libnet: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 1.0.2,REV=2004.04.08_rev=a
>   -   to: 1.0.2a,REV=2010.11.09
>   + libnet-1.0.2a,REV=2010.11.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnet-1.0.2a,REV=2010.11.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libnet: new package
>   + libnet1-1.1.5,REV=2010.11.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnet1-1.1.5,REV=2010.11.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnet_devel-1.1.5,REV=2010.11.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnet_devel-1.1.5,REV=2010.11.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>