From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  1 10:14:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:14:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rssh
Message-ID: <201010010814.o918ERsi029175@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This fixes #4549.

* rssh: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.08.21
  -   to: 2010.09.30
  + rssh-2.3.3,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rssh-2.3.3,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  1 10:48:17 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:48:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs asciidoc
Message-ID: <201010010848.o918mHCn012131@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* asciidoc: minor version upgrade
  - from: 8.5.3,REV=2010.07.23
  -   to: 8.6.1,REV=2010.10.01
  + asciidoc-8.6.1,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  1 16:12:55 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:12:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
Message-ID: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Small fix when no .info-files exist when the package is installed.

* texinfo: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.12.28
  -   to: 2010.10.01
  + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  1 16:23:38 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:23:38 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptpasswdmd5, pm_passwdunix,
	pm_(...)
Message-ID: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>

As requested (https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/private/pkgrequests/2010-September/001314.html):

* pm_structcompare: new package
  + pm_structcompare-1.0.1,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cryptpasswdmd5: new package
  + pm_cryptpasswdmd5-1.3,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_passwdunix: new package
  + pm_passwdunix-0.52,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 01:49:37 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:49:37 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] new version of lighttpd
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikTL9hA4XK+FPU3AbYvk4miYi+WUajMKqmaV67r@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimasLycgzoLcCccTch0V3jo=KaPACwYV04Yi4rm@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=sKBA=qsDSVtYq1kTvhFkfxvH+PGpqhq7E=Uz9@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikTL9hA4XK+FPU3AbYvk4miYi+WUajMKqmaV67r@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikVAYbPkNODcC3Mn1-gPfL_F585ggBSnZpho05c@mail.gmail.com>

Or perhaps even libdir = $(prefix)/libexec/lighttpd
might be better still.


On 9/30/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 30 de Setembro de 2010 10:00, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>> In GAR, you can say:
>>
>> libdir = /usr/lib/lighttpd
>
> I meant:
>
> libdir = /opt/csw/lib/lighttpd
>
> ...or, more generally:
>
> libdir = $(prefix)/lib/lighttpd
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 02:01:24 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:01:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>

ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/texi2pdf' for key 1
DB Update failed.

clash with tetex


On 10/1/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Small fix when no .info-files exist when the package is installed.
>
> * texinfo: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.12.28
>   -   to: 2010.10.01
>   + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 02:02:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:02:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs asciidoc
In-Reply-To: <201010010848.o918mHCn012131@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010010848.o918mHCn012131@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=39ctgh4X0pE+phgCqo_MU5knqvdBWUsw3aVn_@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/1/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * asciidoc: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 8.5.3,REV=2010.07.23
>   -   to: 8.6.1,REV=2010.10.01
>   + asciidoc-8.6.1,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 02:02:55 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:02:55 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs glew
In-Reply-To: <201009301315.o8UDFGac018269@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201009301315.o8UDFGac018269@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wP_Qu+tEJuibuaCWSt0Ok4BbaX+sOarx8_dd6@mail.gmail.com>

Dont get your fingers stuck in it!


On 9/30/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> The last requirement for gource... *Phew*
>
> * glew: new package
>   + glew-1.5.6,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + glew-1.5.6,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 02:05:00 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:05:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rssh
In-Reply-To: <201010010814.o918ERsi029175@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010010814.o918ERsi029175@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=B3oi7FD4a7yf5VNczagfsV7AXdY0ki87HeSne@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/1/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This fixes #4549.
>
> * rssh: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2010.08.21
>   -   to: 2010.09.30
>   + rssh-2.3.3,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + rssh-2.3.3,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 02:04:19 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:04:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ftgl, ftgl_devel
In-Reply-To: <201009290958.o8T9wLJN008786@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201009290958.o8T9wLJN008786@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=9JUwB7=OnpCRzEYLLrhhvOoJ6O2VUav-4QATM@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 9/29/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> One more dependency for gource.
> The rc5 is two years old, but my patches have been processed quite
> fast, so there may be a new version sometimes in the future.
>
> * ftgl: new package
>   + ftgl-2.1.3rc5,REV=2010.09.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ftgl-2.1.3rc5,REV=2010.09.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ftgl_devel-2.1.3rc5,REV=2010.09.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ftgl_devel-2.1.3rc5,REV=2010.09.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 02:07:14 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:07:14 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptpasswdmd5, pm_passwdunix,
	pm_(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimT38QV33Dr2-Y252At0dYYrCvxvwU0JZhJrd2+@mail.gmail.com>

batched
except for pm_passwdunix.
file conflict:


Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/share/doc/pm_pdfreuse/license' for key 1


On 10/1/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> As requested
> (https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/private/pkgrequests/2010-September/001314.html):
>
> * pm_structcompare: new package
>   + pm_structcompare-1.0.1,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_cryptpasswdmd5: new package
>   + pm_cryptpasswdmd5-1.3,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_passwdunix: new package
>   + pm_passwdunix-0.52,REV=2010.09.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sat Oct  2 09:59:22 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:59:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_passwdunix
Message-ID: <201010020759.o927xMC0025567@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Re-submitting rebuilt package due to not clean build environment.

* pm_passwdunix: new package
  + pm_passwdunix-0.52,REV=2010.10.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sat Oct  2 10:10:12 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:10:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptpasswdmd5, pm_passwdunix,
	pm_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimT38QV33Dr2-Y252At0dYYrCvxvwU0JZhJrd2+@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimT38QV33Dr2-Y252At0dYYrCvxvwU0JZhJrd2+@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimcbMvD7MfCBh5KUxRtkFHreUdP0K8vD9tRdyTg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> batched
> except for pm_passwdunix.
> file conflict:
>
>
> Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/share/doc/pm_pdfreuse/license' for key 1

I have re-submitted this package (see separate post). I used the
Makefile from pm_pdfreuse and the build environment wasn't clean.
Should be good now.

Can't you run your collision thingy on the whole catalog and we will
start a project to fix all of these problems? This instance was a new
mistake but we've had lurking collisions out there before and I'm sure
there are more of them.

-- 
/peter

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sat Oct  2 12:25:01 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:25:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:01:24 -0700")
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x662xk7uyq.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/texi2pdf' for key 1
> DB Update failed.
>
> clash with tetex

Well, this is known but never had the time to solve it (teTeX is a
beast, upstream maintained in the TeXLive project which I wish to be
able to release); anyhow, is texi2pdf so advanced viz the one in teTeX?
I'll explore a new release to remove this from teTex which depends or
should depend on texinfo. Note that if I'm doing this I don't want to be
stopped by new exigences that where defined after the previous release
of the package.
-- 
Peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct  2 18:18:57 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:18:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptpasswdmd5, pm_passwdunix,
	pm_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimcbMvD7MfCBh5KUxRtkFHreUdP0K8vD9tRdyTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimT38QV33Dr2-Y252At0dYYrCvxvwU0JZhJrd2+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimcbMvD7MfCBh5KUxRtkFHreUdP0K8vD9tRdyTg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinWtU4Dmh5ggzk1sFFj-r=H5rONOmFVaYFzFPov@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday, October 2, 2010, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:


> Can't you run your collision thingy on the whole catalog and we will
> start a project to fix all of these problems? This instance was a new
> mistake but we've had lurking collisions out there before and I'm sure
> there are more of them.


unfortunately,

- the mechanisms aren't set up to make that sort of thing easy
- there are indeed many more, if I recall :(

any such project should, in my opinion, do a fresh full audit of the
pkgmap files in our repository. the mechanisms I use may miss
something.


if someone were to commit to doing (X) number of collision-resolving
takeover rebuilds, (where X>=5) I would be willing to put in the
effort to extract details from the existing database on needed
packages for them

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Oct  3 08:16:53 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:16:53 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptpasswdmd5, pm_passwdunix,
	pm_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinWtU4Dmh5ggzk1sFFj-r=H5rONOmFVaYFzFPov@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimT38QV33Dr2-Y252At0dYYrCvxvwU0JZhJrd2+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimcbMvD7MfCBh5KUxRtkFHreUdP0K8vD9tRdyTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinWtU4Dmh5ggzk1sFFj-r=H5rONOmFVaYFzFPov@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxbr+a5mxYMPrvFpD+gt=BV8NxwL11sfZ_ZgLa@mail.gmail.com>

[+maintainers]

No dia 2 de Outubro de 2010 09:18, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> On Saturday, October 2, 2010, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Can't you run your collision thingy on the whole catalog and we will
>> start a project to fix all of these problems? This instance was a new
>> mistake but we've had lurking collisions out there before and I'm sure
>> there are more of them.
>
>
> unfortunately,
>
> - the mechanisms aren't set up to make that sort of thing easy
> - there are indeed many more, if I recall :(

Yes, there's more.  All that I could find are here in this file:

http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~maciej/file-conflicts.csv

It's based on the current catalog for sparc from about two days ago,
so pretty fresh.  The first column in the table is maintainer name, so
everyone can easily find their packages.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sun Oct  3 08:31:18 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 08:31:18 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptpasswdmd5, pm_passwdunix,
	pm_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikxbr+a5mxYMPrvFpD+gt=BV8NxwL11sfZ_ZgLa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011423.o91ENchq003415@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimT38QV33Dr2-Y252At0dYYrCvxvwU0JZhJrd2+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimcbMvD7MfCBh5KUxRtkFHreUdP0K8vD9tRdyTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinWtU4Dmh5ggzk1sFFj-r=H5rONOmFVaYFzFPov@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikxbr+a5mxYMPrvFpD+gt=BV8NxwL11sfZ_ZgLa@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimjYWFsqw4W1M8g6MP80FYvCeZjsFQeC5O9xZg_@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Yes, there's more. ?All that I could find are here in this file:
>
> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~maciej/file-conflicts.csv
>
> It's based on the current catalog for sparc from about two days ago,
> so pretty fresh. ?The first column in the table is maintainer name, so
> everyone can easily find their packages.

Thank you Maciej! Great work!

However, you forgot to state your ransom demands like Phil did. Or is
this free? :-)

-- 
/peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Oct  3 21:46:09 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:46:09 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 02.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/ 
> texi2pdf' for key 1
> DB Update failed.
>
> clash with tetex

As Peter said this is a long-standing issue which should be solved
by removing the file from tetex. The associated bugs are
   https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 (tetex)
   https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318 (texinfo)

I suggest to release texinfo as it is as Peter is already working
on a fixed tetex.


Best regards

   -- Dago


> On 10/1/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Small fix when no .info-files exist when the package is installed.
>>
>> * texinfo: revision upgrade
>>  - from: 2009.12.28
>>  -   to: 2010.10.01
>>  + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct  4 00:42:02 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:42:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_passwdunix
In-Reply-To: <201010020759.o927xMC0025567@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010020759.o927xMC0025567@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTV+8VpuD4=WfHk9wgACf7k9ej+rdfEO3sTXMD@mail.gmail.com>

released btw


On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Re-submitting rebuilt package due to not clean build environment.
>
> * pm_passwdunix: new package
> ?+ pm_passwdunix-0.52,REV=2010.10.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  4 00:44:03 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:44:03 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>

*wave*


> Am 02.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/texi2pdf' for
>> key 1
>> DB Update failed.
>>
>> clash with tetex
>
> As Peter said this is a long-standing issue which should be solved
> by removing the file from tetex. The associated bugs are
> ?https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 (tetex)
> ?https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318 (texinfo)
>
> I suggest to release texinfo as it is as Peter is already working
> on a fixed tetex.


That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
registering it.
Neither sound good to me.
I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  4 11:39:11 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:39:11 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 04.10.2010 um 00:44 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> Am 02.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>
>>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/ 
>>> texi2pdf' for
>>> key 1
>>> DB Update failed.
>>>
>>> clash with tetex
>>
>> As Peter said this is a long-standing issue which should be solved
>> by removing the file from tetex. The associated bugs are
>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 (tetex)
>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318 (texinfo)
>>
>> I suggest to release texinfo as it is as Peter is already working
>> on a fixed tetex.
>
> That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
> registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
> registering it.

Or just add an override of the check? The issue has been there for
a long time and CSWtexinfo is the correct package. It would be
most useful to just override the test and say "texinfo is the
correct package".

> Neither sound good to me.
> I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.

Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
for "technical" reasons.


Best regards

   -- Dago



From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  4 13:16:08 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:16:08 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bison
Message-ID: <201010041116.o94BG8D9006887@login.bo.opencsw.org>

As requested.

* bison: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.4.1,REV=2009.05.12
  -   to: 2.4.3,REV=2010.10.04
  + bison-2.4.3,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bison-2.4.3,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  4 15:12:01 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:12:01 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsexy, libsexy_devel
Message-ID: <201010041312.o94DC13F006727@login.bo.opencsw.org>

..and another dependency for graphics stuff...

* libsexy: new package
  + libsexy-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libsexy-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libsexy_devel-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libsexy_devel-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct  4 18:51:54 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:51:54 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsexy, libsexy_devel
In-Reply-To: <201010041312.o94DC13F006727@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010041312.o94DC13F006727@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTiny6QiGNAd_VUpWjrCT5Dva2kC3JmQVPy+6SK+r@mail.gmail.com>

subtle.
batched.


On 10/4/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> ..and another dependency for graphics stuff...
>
> * libsexy: new package
>   + libsexy-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libsexy-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libsexy_devel-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libsexy_devel-0.1.11,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct  4 19:07:23 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:07:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
	<89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Oast89sDxeXNuVCd8wm1HEpZfQ4nfod_pLKZL@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/4/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 04.10.2010 um 00:44 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> Am 02.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/
>>>> texi2pdf' for
>>>> key 1
>>>> DB Update failed.
>>>>
>>>> clash with tetex
>>>
>>> As Peter said this is a long-standing issue which should be solved
>>> by removing the file from tetex. The associated bugs are
>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 (tetex)
>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318 (texinfo)
>>>
>>> I suggest to release texinfo as it is as Peter is already working
>>> on a fixed tetex.
>>
>> That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
>> registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
>> registering it.
>
> Or just add an override of the check? The issue has been there for
> a long time and CSWtexinfo is the correct package. It would be
> most useful to just override the test and say "texinfo is the
> correct package".
>
>> Neither sound good to me.
>> I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.
>
> Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
> to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
> on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
> for "technical" reasons.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>    -- Dago
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct  4 19:09:17 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:09:17 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
	<89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinL0K6LgJ+hMe39CXGsyu8yexP8ax5kMGdN9zz+@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/4/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
>> registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
>> registering it.
>
> Or just add an override of the check?

There isnt a "check", this is a "database constraint".
I cant just undo the constraint.

>
>> Neither sound good to me.
>> I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.
>
> Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
> to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
> on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
> for "technical" reasons.

You could also choose to repackage the existing tetex binaries, but
remove the offending specific executable.
Then I could reregister that and repush it.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct  4 19:11:03 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:11:03 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bison
In-Reply-To: <201010041116.o94BG8D9006887@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010041116.o94BG8D9006887@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQVTaaZcHRnZqTJHFy2zU0brc0pybX8ftuf+PH@mail.gmail.com>

Clash with existing gnulinks, since you added new links for the bison package.
(yacc)

Please update gnulinks and submit first.

Although I dont see why you would even bother having this symlink.
GNU stuff tends to explicitly look for "bison", not "yacc".
I'd suggest taking the symlink out.

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  4 20:08:53 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:08:53 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinL0K6LgJ+hMe39CXGsyu8yexP8ax5kMGdN9zz+@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:09:17 -0700")
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
	<89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinL0K6LgJ+hMe39CXGsyu8yexP8ax5kMGdN9zz+@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6d3rp6dai.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On 10/4/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
>>> registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
>>> registering it.
>>
>> Or just add an override of the check?
>
> There isnt a "check", this is a "database constraint".
> I cant just undo the constraint.

???

You make this database stuff so mysterious...

>>
>>> Neither sound good to me.
>>> I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.
>>
>> Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
>> to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
>> on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
>> for "technical" reasons.
>
> You could also choose to repackage the existing tetex binaries, but
> remove the offending specific executable.
> Then I could reregister that and repush it.

Its not needed: I'm respining teTeX correcting some other issues.
-- 
Peter

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  4 22:32:44 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:32:44 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
Message-ID: <201010042032.o94KWici024100@login.bo.opencsw.org>

upgrade to mercurial 1.6.4

* mercurial: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.07.11
  -   to: 2010.10.04
  + mercurial-1.6.4,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + mercurial-1.6.4,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct  4 22:41:54 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:54 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
In-Reply-To: <201010042032.o94KWici024100@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010042032.o94KWici024100@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=4R9rVmKvKxQ=bnajWphO+j8mN7k5F+M=bGnRb@mail.gmail.com>

Great. batched, thanks.


On 10/4/10, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> upgrade to mercurial 1.6.4
>
> * mercurial: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2010.07.11
>   -   to: 2010.10.04
>   + mercurial-1.6.4,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + mercurial-1.6.4,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Tue Oct  5 20:30:58 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:30:58 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tetex
Message-ID: <x6pqvo4hlp.fsf@opencsw.org>

* tetex: new package
  + tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

This closes	0003508 and	0004030 issues and corrects other file clashes
with texinfo.

Remark: checkpkg gives false positives for /usr/share on text files which
        are not relevant to the package behaviour (e.g. PostScript and
        INSTALL* documentation that I can/want not build)
-- 
Peter

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Tue Oct  5 20:40:50 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:40:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org> (Dagobert
	Michelsen's message of "Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:39:11 +0200")
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
	<89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x6lj6c4h59.fsf@opencsw.org>

Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:

> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 04.10.2010 um 00:44 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> Am 02.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/
>>>> texi2pdf' for
>>>> key 1
>>>> DB Update failed.
>>>>
>>>> clash with tetex
>>>
>>> As Peter said this is a long-standing issue which should be solved
>>> by removing the file from tetex. The associated bugs are
>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 (tetex)
>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318 (texinfo)
>>>
>>> I suggest to release texinfo as it is as Peter is already working
>>> on a fixed tetex.
>>
>> That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
>> registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
>> registering it.
>
> Or just add an override of the check? The issue has been there for
> a long time and CSWtexinfo is the correct package. It would be
> most useful to just override the test and say "texinfo is the
> correct package".
>
>> Neither sound good to me.
>> I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.
>
> Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
> to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
> on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
> for "technical" reasons.

I just released a new package correcting the conflict.
-- 
Peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct  5 21:00:48 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:00:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tetex
In-Reply-To: <x6pqvo4hlp.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <x6pqvo4hlp.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=RjjOVL_GuHy6urj+Q_c8hgEv=P4KaTtHe-USY@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 5 de Outubro de 2010 11:30, Peter FELECAN
<pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> * tetex: new package
> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> This closes ? ? 0003508 and ? ? 0004030 issues and corrects other file clashes
> with texinfo.
>
> Remark: checkpkg gives false positives for /usr/share on text files which
> ? ? ? ?are not relevant to the package behaviour (e.g. PostScript and
> ? ? ? ?INSTALL* documentation that I can/want not build)

What are the exact alerts?

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct  5 21:06:30 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:06:30 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <x6lj6c4h59.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
	<89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
	<x6lj6c4h59.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik4NJpL=jN8HOZoz=S=_mmkvwhroy23ZSpE4OwG@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks!
batched tetex.

The other one will be checked in a min...


On 10/5/10, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Am 04.10.2010 um 00:44 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>> Am 02.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 18: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/
>>>>> texi2pdf' for
>>>>> key 1
>>>>> DB Update failed.
>>>>>
>>>>> clash with tetex
>>>>
>>>> As Peter said this is a long-standing issue which should be solved
>>>> by removing the file from tetex. The associated bugs are
>>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 (tetex)
>>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318 (texinfo)
>>>>
>>>> I suggest to release texinfo as it is as Peter is already working
>>>> on a fixed tetex.
>>>
>>> That would require me either doing nasty by-hand stuff to our
>>> registration database, or me releasing the package without properly
>>> registering it.
>>
>> Or just add an override of the check? The issue has been there for
>> a long time and CSWtexinfo is the correct package. It would be
>> most useful to just override the test and say "texinfo is the
>> correct package".
>>
>>> Neither sound good to me.
>>> I'll wait until tetex update is ready first.
>>
>> Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
>> to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
>> on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
>> for "technical" reasons.
>
> I just released a new package correcting the conflict.
> --
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct  5 21:07:33 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:07:33 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTintO2Zm-bgjkhviXSKAOZAfaZWFe82ECQBLnGZ_@mail.gmail.com>

Well, since Peter F. was nice enough to update tetex, I have batched
this one also


On 10/1/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Small fix when no .info-files exist when the package is installed.
>
> * texinfo: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.12.28
>   -   to: 2010.10.01
>   + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 09:19:02 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:19:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tetex
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=RjjOVL_GuHy6urj+Q_c8hgEv=P4KaTtHe-USY@mail.gmail.com>
	(Maciej Blizinski's message of "Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:00:48 -0700")
References: <x6pqvo4hlp.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=RjjOVL_GuHy6urj+Q_c8hgEv=P4KaTtHe-USY@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6hbgz4wm1.fsf@opencsw.org>

"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:

> No dia 5 de Outubro de 2010 11:30, Peter FELECAN
> <pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>> * tetex: new package
>> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> This closes ? ? 0003508 and ? ? 0004030 issues and corrects other file clashes
>> with texinfo.
>>
>> Remark: checkpkg gives false positives for /usr/share on text files which
>> ? ? ? ?are not relevant to the package behaviour (e.g. PostScript and
>> ? ? ? ?INSTALL* documentation that I can/want not build)
>
> What are the exact alerts?

Look at the tail of
login:/home/pfelecan/CSW/logs/tetex-3.0REV2010.10.05-sparc.log

-- 
Peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 10:18:53 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:18:53 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <x6lj6c4h59.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikBcuNvLcPmMe__57UuqEMdi5j+veTUgXnY+pei@mail.gmail.com>
	<882A6A31-E068-422F-B555-F852BF63DAB1@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimxNb4+j9vbN5hSrZUHxnhHvGYwEFRGL+7Ftf_7@mail.gmail.com>
	<89A2C8A0-BABC-45FD-9B7E-931A53902BA7@opencsw.org>
	<x6lj6c4h59.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <8688C2A7-F4D2-4419-ABEA-5ADDC44D22D7@opencsw.org>

Hi Peter,

Am 05.10.2010 um 20:40 schrieb Peter FELECAN:
> Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:
>> Umh.... no. Given the size of the package it will take 3-4 weeks
>> to finish (Peter: right?) and I fixed the bug due to user request
>> on the same day he reported the bug. It would be bad to stall now
>> for "technical" reasons.
>
> I just released a new package correcting the conflict.

Wow, that was fast! This raises expectations - I guess you will have
finished both gcc3 and gcc4 by... noon? ;-)


Best regards

   -- Dago



From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 10:20:54 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:20:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs texinfo
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTintO2Zm-bgjkhviXSKAOZAfaZWFe82ECQBLnGZ_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010011412.o91ECt2B010852@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTintO2Zm-bgjkhviXSKAOZAfaZWFe82ECQBLnGZ_@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CB73BE1E-0527-4AF2-961D-D5D489F39646@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 05.10.2010 um 21:07 schrieb Philip Brown:
> Well, since Peter F. was nice enough to update tetex, I have batched
> this one also

Cool. But you should add a way to force release packages even with
duplicate lines.

Best regards

   -- Dago

>
>
> On 10/1/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Small fix when no .info-files exist when the package is installed.
>>
>> * texinfo: revision upgrade
>>  - from: 2009.12.28
>>  -   to: 2010.10.01
>>  + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + texinfo-4.13a,REV=2010.10.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 17:25:26 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:25:26 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsmft, pm_filefetch,
	pm_ipcc(...)
Message-ID: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Removed man pages, updated to current where possible, takeovers from Cory.

* pm_lclemktxtsimple: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.12,REV=2006.01.28
  -   to: 0.21,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_lclemktxtsimple-0.21,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_modload: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.03.30
  -   to: 2010.10.06
  + pm_modload-0.18,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_modloadcond: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.36,REV=2010.03.30
  -   to: 0.38,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_modloadcond-0.38,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_ipccmd: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.36,REV=2007.03.16
  -   to: 0.60,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_ipccmd-0.60,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_prmscheck: revision upgrade
  - from: 2007.03.17
  -   to: 2010.10.06
  + pm_prmscheck-0.26,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_termui: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.14,REV=2007.03.16
  -   to: 0.20,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_termui-0.20,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.01,REV=2007.03.16
  -   to: 0.06,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_logmsgsimple-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_modloaded-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_filefetch: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.10,REV=2007.03.16
  -   to: 0.24,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_filefetch-0.24,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_extutilsmft: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.51,REV=2007.03.16
  -   to: 1.58,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_extutilsmft-1.58,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 17:38:45 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:38:45 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Remove CSWpmlogmessage,
	CSWpmmodcorelist and CSWpmcpanplus
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>

1. CSWpmlogmessage should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
current version 0.02, CSWpmlogmessage is older (0.01) and is actually
a downgrade. Unlikely to ever be upgraded, 0.02 is from 2008.

2. CSWpmmodcorelist should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
2.18, current is 2.39, CSWpmmodcorelist is 2.26. 2.18 is only a year
old so it's likely not critical to have a newer version than that.
Only package needing it is CSWpmcpanplus. If someone ever requests a
newer version we could deal with it then.

3. CSWpmcpanplus should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has 0.88,
CSWpmcpanplus is 0.076, current is 0.9007. Our package is a downgrade
and should be either removed or upgraded immediately. I suggest
removal since that solves the collisions and there's no packages
needing it. The version in CSWperl is about a year old so pretty new.

-- 
/peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 18:27:02 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:27:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tetex
In-Reply-To: <x6hbgz4wm1.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <x6pqvo4hlp.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=RjjOVL_GuHy6urj+Q_c8hgEv=P4KaTtHe-USY@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6hbgz4wm1.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinx77cbd9r-K5JNY-OSfAa2g1A0-GuT4qWeG_2T@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 6 de Outubro de 2010 00:19, Peter FELECAN
<pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:
>
>> No dia 5 de Outubro de 2010 11:30, Peter FELECAN
>> <pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>>> * tetex: new package
>>> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>
>>> This closes ? ? 0003508 and ? ? 0004030 issues and corrects other file clashes
>>> with texinfo.
>>>
>>> Remark: checkpkg gives false positives for /usr/share on text files which
>>> ? ? ? ?are not relevant to the package behaviour (e.g. PostScript and
>>> ? ? ? ?INSTALL* documentation that I can/want not build)
>>
>> What are the exact alerts?
>
> Look at the tail of
> login:/home/pfelecan/CSW/logs/tetex-3.0REV2010.10.05-sparc.log

I looked at it; it doesn't look like checkpkg output to me.  I ran
checkpkg myself, here are the results:

http://paste.pocoo.org/show/271808/

There is a couple of Emacs, Perl, Python and Ruby files in the
package, so checkpkg suggests adding dependencies, but I guess in this
case you don't care if something like
/opt/csw/share/texmf-dist/doc/latex/shapepar/proshap.py can't be used.

It showed a couple of surplus dependencies, I think some of them might
be actually not needed, but I don't have enough information to be sure
which ones.

I didn't see the false positives on text files in /usr/share (.pm,
.py, etc. aside).

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct  6 18:29:57 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:29:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Remove CSWpmlogmessage,
	CSWpmmodcorelist and CSWpmcpanplus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=H4JKfCBrtbUKYD79bwxrCk1ng=4f8SQKoeBOi@mail.gmail.com>

Oh.. okay now I see your email on this :-}

I'm not sure this really belongs in the pkgsubmissions list.

In the future, please email removal requests to the maintainers list;
that way it may get more attention.

I'll try to get to this today


On 10/6/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> 1. CSWpmlogmessage should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
> current version 0.02, CSWpmlogmessage is older (0.01) and is actually
> a downgrade. Unlikely to ever be upgraded, 0.02 is from 2008.
>
> 2. CSWpmmodcorelist should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
> 2.18, current is 2.39, CSWpmmodcorelist is 2.26. 2.18 is only a year
> old so it's likely not critical to have a newer version than that.
> Only package needing it is CSWpmcpanplus. If someone ever requests a
> newer version we could deal with it then.
>
> 3. CSWpmcpanplus should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has 0.88,
> CSWpmcpanplus is 0.076, current is 0.9007. Our package is a downgrade
> and should be either removed or upgraded immediately. I suggest
> removal since that solves the collisions and there's no packages
> needing it. The version in CSWperl is about a year old so pretty new.
>
> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct  6 18:56:22 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:56:22 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsmft, pm_filefetch,
	pm_ipcc(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=w49igxpUa_7BLu2tBxKUHfNTYC8fQ_EJ9+MX8@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks.

two bugs for submitpkg for Maciej if he's reading this:

1. would be nice if the thing sorted alphabetically

2.  Note missing output here: "pm"



On 10/6/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Removed man pages, updated to current where possible, takeovers from Cory.
>
> * pm: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.01,REV=2007.03.16
>   -   to: 0.06,REV=2010.10.06
>   + pm_logmsgsimple-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pm_modloaded-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct  6 19:00:36 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:00:36 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Remove CSWpmlogmessage,
	CSWpmmodcorelist and CSWpmcpanplus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=H4JKfCBrtbUKYD79bwxrCk1ng=4f8SQKoeBOi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=H4JKfCBrtbUKYD79bwxrCk1ng=4f8SQKoeBOi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinLxQHgLVayeR6MO_e2wv=cLeD1MAZ99vAbhJR3@mail.gmail.com>

Also for future reference, please give BOTH the CSWxxx and the
software name, of packages to be removed.


On 10/6/10, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> Oh.. okay now I see your email on this :-}
>
> I'm not sure this really belongs in the pkgsubmissions list.
>
> In the future, please email removal requests to the maintainers list;
> that way it may get more attention.
>
> I'll try to get to this today
>
>
> On 10/6/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> 1. CSWpmlogmessage should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
>> current version 0.02, CSWpmlogmessage is older (0.01) and is actually
>> a downgrade. Unlikely to ever be upgraded, 0.02 is from 2008.
>>
>> 2. CSWpmmodcorelist should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
>> 2.18, current is 2.39, CSWpmmodcorelist is 2.26. 2.18 is only a year
>> old so it's likely not critical to have a newer version than that.
>> Only package needing it is CSWpmcpanplus. If someone ever requests a
>> newer version we could deal with it then.
>>
>> 3. CSWpmcpanplus should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has 0.88,
>> CSWpmcpanplus is 0.076, current is 0.9007. Our package is a downgrade
>> and should be either removed or upgraded immediately. I suggest
>> removal since that solves the collisions and there's no packages
>> needing it. The version in CSWperl is about a year old so pretty new.
>>
>> --
>> /peter
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 19:08:51 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:08:51 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsmft, pm_filefetch,
	pm_ipcc(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=w49igxpUa_7BLu2tBxKUHfNTYC8fQ_EJ9+MX8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=w49igxpUa_7BLu2tBxKUHfNTYC8fQ_EJ9+MX8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKhmsDFu9uTKPYZ=W8+jQcd6R14An75DhE8BtV@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 6 de Outubro de 2010 09:56, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> Thanks.
>
> two bugs for submitpkg for Maciej if he's reading this:
>
> 1. would be nice if the thing sorted alphabetically

This can be arranged.
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/ticket/34

> 2. ?Note missing output here: "pm"

>> ? - ? to: 0.06,REV=2010.10.06
>> ? + pm_logmsgsimple-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + pm_modloaded-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

This one is a heuristics fail.  There were two packages going towards
the exact same version, which is the way submitpkg groups package.
Then, it looked at the longest common substring, which is "pm".  I
don't have a good idea how to improve this particular case without
making other cases much worse.

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct  6 21:55:31 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:55:31 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutcbuilder, pm_extutparsexs,
	pm(...)
Message-ID: <201010061955.o96JtVQW019897@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Several updates from Peters' rework.

* pm_testsimple: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.94,REV=2010.02.03
  -   to: 0.96,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_testsimple-0.96,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_extutcbuilder: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.26.03,REV=2009.08.06
  -   to: 0.2703,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_extutcbuilder-0.2703,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_extutparsexs: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.20.02,REV=2009.08.06
  -   to: 2.2206,REV=2010.10.06
  + pm_extutparsexs-2.2206,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_moduleplug: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.08.06
  -   to: 2010.10.06
  + pm_moduleplug-3.9,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct  6 22:18:53 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:18:53 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsmft, pm_filefetch,
	pm_ipcc(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimKhmsDFu9uTKPYZ=W8+jQcd6R14An75DhE8BtV@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=w49igxpUa_7BLu2tBxKUHfNTYC8fQ_EJ9+MX8@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimKhmsDFu9uTKPYZ=W8+jQcd6R14An75DhE8BtV@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimtfY3J6_W7FOwvZX2tZDJuoGPGJUhNo37+rXM_@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/6/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> 2.  Note missing output here: "pm"
>
>>>   -   to: 0.06,REV=2010.10.06
>>>   + pm_logmsgsimple-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>   + pm_modloaded-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> This one is a heuristics fail.  There were two packages going towards
> the exact same version, which is the way submitpkg groups package.
> Then, it looked at the longest common substring, which is "pm".  I
> don't have a good idea how to improve this particular case without
> making other cases much worse.
>

Special-case "pm_" ?

I was going to say special case things that are really short.. but
then I remembered things like "ap2_". sigh.

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct  6 22:19:29 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:19:29 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutcbuilder, pm_extutparsexs,
	pm(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010061955.o96JtVQW019897@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010061955.o96JtVQW019897@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinZHuv1yqi5mzGhDuAMReHFegE15k-SeAFtPwGp@mail.gmail.com>

okay thanks


On 10/6/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Several updates from Peters' rework.
>
> * pm_testsimple: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.94,REV=2010.02.03
>   -   to: 0.96,REV=2010.10.06
>   + pm_testsimple-0.96,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_extutcbuilder: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.26.03,REV=2009.08.06
>   -   to: 0.2703,REV=2010.10.06
>   + pm_extutcbuilder-0.2703,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_extutparsexs: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 2.20.02,REV=2009.08.06
>   -   to: 2.2206,REV=2010.10.06
>   + pm_extutparsexs-2.2206,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_moduleplug: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.08.06
>   -   to: 2010.10.06
>   + pm_moduleplug-3.9,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Thu Oct  7 10:39:02 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:39:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsmft, pm_filefetch,
	pm_ipcc(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimKhmsDFu9uTKPYZ=W8+jQcd6R14An75DhE8BtV@mail.gmail.com>
	(Maciej Blizinski's message of "Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:08:51 -0700")
References: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=w49igxpUa_7BLu2tBxKUHfNTYC8fQ_EJ9+MX8@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimKhmsDFu9uTKPYZ=W8+jQcd6R14An75DhE8BtV@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6pqvm2y8p.fsf@opencsw.org>

"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:

> No dia 6 de Outubro de 2010 09:56, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> two bugs for submitpkg for Maciej if he's reading this:
>>
>> 1. would be nice if the thing sorted alphabetically
>
> This can be arranged.
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/ticket/34
>
>> 2. ?Note missing output here: "pm"
>
>>> ? - ? to: 0.06,REV=2010.10.06
>>> ? + pm_logmsgsimple-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> ? + pm_modloaded-0.06,REV=2010.10.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> This one is a heuristics fail.  There were two packages going towards
> the exact same version, which is the way submitpkg groups package.
> Then, it looked at the longest common substring, which is "pm".  I
> don't have a good idea how to improve this particular case without
> making other cases much worse.

I understand that this is a little bit aside from the subject, but
what's submitpkg, where can I find-it and how to use-it?
-- 
Peter

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Thu Oct  7 10:43:24 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:43:24 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tetex
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinx77cbd9r-K5JNY-OSfAa2g1A0-GuT4qWeG_2T@mail.gmail.com>
	(Maciej Blizinski's message of "Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:27:02 -0700")
References: <x6pqvo4hlp.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=RjjOVL_GuHy6urj+Q_c8hgEv=P4KaTtHe-USY@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6hbgz4wm1.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinx77cbd9r-K5JNY-OSfAa2g1A0-GuT4qWeG_2T@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6lj6a2y1f.fsf@opencsw.org>

"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:

> No dia 6 de Outubro de 2010 00:19, Peter FELECAN
> <pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>> "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:
>>
>>> No dia 5 de Outubro de 2010 11:30, Peter FELECAN
>>> <pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>>>> * tetex: new package
>>>> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>> ?+ tetex-3.0,REV=2010.10.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>>
>>>> This closes ? ? 0003508 and ? ? 0004030 issues and corrects other file clashes
>>>> with texinfo.
>>>>
>>>> Remark: checkpkg gives false positives for /usr/share on text files which
>>>> ? ? ? ?are not relevant to the package behaviour (e.g. PostScript and
>>>> ? ? ? ?INSTALL* documentation that I can/want not build)
>>>
>>> What are the exact alerts?
>>
>> Look at the tail of
>> login:/home/pfelecan/CSW/logs/tetex-3.0REV2010.10.05-sparc.log
>
> I looked at it; it doesn't look like checkpkg output to me.[...]

Indeed, we may not discuss the same tool. What I'm refering to is
/opt/csw/bin/checkpkg supplied by CSWcswutils and which is a creature of
Phil...

Your creature is installed where, what package supplies-it how to use-it?
-- 
Peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Oct  7 14:40:41 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawbz2,
	pm_compressrawzlib(...)
Message-ID: <201010071240.o97Cef4n000716@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Since Benny is on sabbatical (according to Dago) I have rebuilt these packages. Updated versions and removed man pages (colliding with CSWperl).

* pm_compressrawzlib: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.024,REV=2010.02.01
  -   to: 2.030,REV=2010.10.07
  + pm_compressrawzlib-2.030,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_compressrawzlib-2.030,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_compressrawbz2: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.024,REV=2010.02.01
  -   to: 2.031,REV=2010.10.07
  + pm_compressrawbz2-2.031,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_compressrawbz2-2.031,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_version: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.80,REV=2010.02.01
  -   to: 0.82,REV=2010.10.07
  + pm_version-0.82,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_version-0.82,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct  8 00:06:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:06:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Remove CSWpmlogmessage,
	CSWpmmodcorelist and CSWpmcpanplus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=d=+bRM0p_6cBiqoC6_ZRyaSdTAu_i8pdZjji1@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/6/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> 1. CSWpmlogmessage should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
> current version 0.02, CSWpmlogmessage is older (0.01) and is actually
> a downgrade. Unlikely to ever be upgraded, 0.02 is from 2008.
>

you forgot to check dependancies.

"ERROR! Dependency CSWpmlogmessage of package CSWpmlogmsgsimple is missing."

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  8 01:03:48 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:03:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsmft, pm_filefetch,
	pm_ipcc(...)
In-Reply-To: <x6pqvm2y8p.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201010061525.o96FPQ2f013426@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=w49igxpUa_7BLu2tBxKUHfNTYC8fQ_EJ9+MX8@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimKhmsDFu9uTKPYZ=W8+jQcd6R14An75DhE8BtV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6pqvm2y8p.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim8htva=N6nKJFXY-3=87UFhddE+WuhPXE5LCLT@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 7 de Outubro de 2010 01:39, Peter FELECAN
<pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> I understand that this is a little bit aside from the subject, but
> what's submitpkg, where can I find-it and how to use-it?

I'm glad you asked!

submitpkg is a tool that takes files from
/home/experimental/${LOGNAME}, copies them to bender and formats an
e-mail that you can then send to the release manager.  It's installed
on the buildfarm, so once your files are in
/home/experimental/${LOGNAME}, you can say:

submitpkg -c catalogname

...to copy your files to /home/newpkgs on bender and format the
e-mail. It'll also display instructions, what to do next.

I wrote up a wiki page with a list of our maintainer tools:
http://wiki.opencsw.org/maintainer-tools

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  8 10:10:05 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:10:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_logmsgsimple
Message-ID: <201010080810.o988A5NH015487@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Removed dependency to pm_logmessage.

* pm_logmsgsimple: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.01,REV=2007.03.16
  -   to: 0.06,REV=2010.10.08
  + pm_logmsgsimple-0.06,REV=2010.10.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Oct  8 10:11:57 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:11:57 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Remove CSWpmlogmessage,
	CSWpmmodcorelist and CSWpmcpanplus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=d=+bRM0p_6cBiqoC6_ZRyaSdTAu_i8pdZjji1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=bAS-j-NFWNRBq5L64Jwdk9DOqt+5NnE=A4s+2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=d=+bRM0p_6cBiqoC6_ZRyaSdTAu_i8pdZjji1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikGCtQAK=C6qLPV0wL+yb-qmNU74ASM+iVeUeFG@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> On 10/6/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> 1. CSWpmlogmessage should be removed from the catalog. CSWperl has
>> current version 0.02, CSWpmlogmessage is older (0.01) and is actually
>> a downgrade. Unlikely to ever be upgraded, 0.02 is from 2008.
>
> you forgot to check dependancies.
>
> "ERROR! Dependency CSWpmlogmessage of package CSWpmlogmsgsimple is missing."

Ok, I have rebuilt CSWpmlogmsgsimple without that dependency (since
it's in CSWperl anyway). Submitted in separate mail.

-- 
/peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Oct 10 02:46:05 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:46:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
Message-ID: <201010100046.o9A0k5nF009293@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Version bump.

Thanks
-Ben

* libxslt: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08
  -   to: 1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10
  + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 12:03:25 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:03:25 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_common
Message-ID: <201010111003.o9BA3P76003963@login.bo.opencsw.org>

A base library for a longer chain of dependencies.

* py_logilab_common: new package
  + py_logilab_common-0.52.0,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 12:30:07 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:30:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs squid
Message-ID: <201010111030.o9BAU7Y5015710@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* squid: revision upgrade
  - from: ('STABLE6',)
  -   to: ('STABLE9',)
  + squid-2.7,REV=2010.10.05_STABLE9-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + squid-2.7,REV=2010.10.05_STABLE9-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 15:09:19 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:09:19 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawbz2,
	pm_compressrawzlib(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010071240.o97Cef4n000716@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010071240.o97Cef4n000716@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim+WP+s2U2Nh3tkyT6q7tQPVVKKJebmNGAP=VWa@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Since Benny is on sabbatical (according to Dago) I have rebuilt these packages. Updated versions and removed man pages (colliding with CSWperl).
>
> * pm_compressrawzlib: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.024,REV=2010.02.01
> ?- ? to: 2.030,REV=2010.10.07
> ?+ pm_compressrawzlib-2.030,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_compressrawzlib-2.030,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_compressrawbz2: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.024,REV=2010.02.01
> ?- ? to: 2.031,REV=2010.10.07
> ?+ pm_compressrawbz2-2.031,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_compressrawbz2-2.031,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_version: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.80,REV=2010.02.01
> ?- ? to: 0.82,REV=2010.10.07
> ?+ pm_version-0.82,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_version-0.82,REV=2010.10.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

These were not included in the latest mirror update..?

/peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 17:48:32 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:48:32 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_mp3tag
Message-ID: <201010111548.o9BFmWjC021177@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_mp3tag: new package
  + pm_mp3tag-1.13,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 17:48:57 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:48:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs diffstat
Message-ID: <201010111548.o9BFmvul021191@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* diffstat: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.53,REV=2010.07.22
  -   to: 1.54,REV=2010.10.11
  + diffstat-1.54,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + diffstat-1.54,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 18:14:19 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:14:19 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
Message-ID: <201010111614.o9BGEJl2007601@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Removed gnulinks to bison

* gnulinks: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.08.28
  -   to: 2010.10.11
  + gnulinks-1.4,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 11 18:32:46 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:32:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs adobereader
Message-ID: <201010111632.o9BGWkFa012510@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Please remove 9.3.4 from current/i386/5.9 *completely* as it in fact
does not work under Solaris 9. There is 8.1.7 for Solaris 9 Sparc
and 9.x for Solaris 10 x86, other versions are not available.
The release for Solaris 9 i386 was a mistake.

* adobereader: minor version upgrade
  - from: 9.3.4,REV=2010.08.23
  -   to: 9.4.0,REV=2010.10.11
  + adobereader-9.4.0,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:44:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:44:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs adobereader
In-Reply-To: <201010111632.o9BGWkFa012510@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010111632.o9BGWkFa012510@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikARB4EOoRhc_uaavNDPfnfB30_SRqSRQUAGASm@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On 10/11/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Please remove 9.3.4 from current/i386/5.9 *completely* as it in fact
> does not work under Solaris 9. There is 8.1.7 for Solaris 9 Sparc
> and 9.x for Solaris 10 x86, other versions are not available.
> The release for Solaris 9 i386 was a mistake.
>
> * adobereader: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 9.3.4,REV=2010.08.23
>   -   to: 9.4.0,REV=2010.10.11
>   + adobereader-9.4.0,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:45:20 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:45:20 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <201010111614.o9BGEJl2007601@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010111614.o9BGEJl2007601@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimqA6ifyMWOd3th6JpmOQLOjLcgoLGkJuaaT33Z@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, batched, along with bison


On 10/11/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Removed gnulinks to bison
>
> * gnulinks: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2010.08.28
>   -   to: 2010.10.11
>   + gnulinks-1.4,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:46:13 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:46:13 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs diffstat
In-Reply-To: <201010111548.o9BFmvul021191@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010111548.o9BFmvul021191@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=VY=Bvuw3GjtWg1DzFJzoVQTNa=-MaoaY+O7zQ@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 10/11/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * diffstat: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 1.53,REV=2010.07.22
>   -   to: 1.54,REV=2010.10.11
>   + diffstat-1.54,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + diffstat-1.54,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:52:58 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:52:58 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <201010100046.o9A0k5nF009293@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010100046.o9A0k5nF009293@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTincPesQyeBgXxa5H5oD=Df1USdppqPEFhWdwxwz@mail.gmail.com>

Coupla things here:

1. you seem to be wanting to change the PKG name of py_libxslt, and
you did not mention it

2. you added a conflict to the older package

3. You also added a conflict to CSWpylibxslt, **in libsxlt**.


Since there seem to be zero dependancies on CSWpylibxslt, I wont
strongly object to the rename there. But you do need to remove it from
the C lib package, and you'll need to announce the change (announce
list) when the package is fixed and released.


On 10/9/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Version bump.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
>
> * libxslt: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08
>   -   to: 1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10
>   + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:53:29 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:53:29 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs squid
In-Reply-To: <201010111030.o9BAU7Y5015710@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010111030.o9BAU7Y5015710@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinYk_iVyJKU7KnR9b0de2cziUVFbVjShDBgDCpw@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/11/10, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * squid: revision upgrade
>   - from: ('STABLE6',)
>   -   to: ('STABLE9',)
>   + squid-2.7,REV=2010.10.05_STABLE9-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + squid-2.7,REV=2010.10.05_STABLE9-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:55:38 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:55:38 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_common
In-Reply-To: <201010111003.o9BA3P76003963@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010111003.o9BA3P76003963@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikGgiepGj39B76NH8p3MJkjCCmkO4JZu_0NtkZm@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/11/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> A base library for a longer chain of dependencies.
>
> * py_logilab_common: new package
>   + py_logilab_common-0.52.0,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:56:41 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:56:41 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_mp3tag
In-Reply-To: <201010111548.o9BFmWjC021177@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010111548.o9BFmWjC021177@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=zgk59wF9Bn6f7-=_S4SZrtuDNkLkQoJJWy+ew@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/11/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_mp3tag: new package
>   + pm_mp3tag-1.13,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 11 19:58:29 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:58:29 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawbz2,
	pm_compressrawzlib(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim+WP+s2U2Nh3tkyT6q7tQPVVKKJebmNGAP=VWa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010071240.o97Cef4n000716@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim+WP+s2U2Nh3tkyT6q7tQPVVKKJebmNGAP=VWa@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimF7fLkL4a+oFEQpE8SM-OgasQtjG6hixFDv60t@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/11/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> l).
>>
>> * pm_compressrawzlib: minor version upgrade
>>
>>
>> * pm_compressrawbz2: minor version upgrade
>>
>> * pm_version: minor version upgrade
>>
>
> These were not included in the latest mirror update..?
>

they're going out in today's batch now.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 02:25:29 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:25:29 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTincPesQyeBgXxa5H5oD=Df1USdppqPEFhWdwxwz@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010100046.o9A0k5nF009293@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTincPesQyeBgXxa5H5oD=Df1USdppqPEFhWdwxwz@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1286842958-sup-2692@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Oct 11 13:52:58 -0400 2010:

> 1. you seem to be wanting to change the PKG name of py_libxslt, and
>    you did not mention it

Yes, and I realized after hitting the 'fire' button that I'd omitted
that.

> 2. you added a conflict to the older package

Yup.

> 3. You also added a conflict to CSWpylibxslt, **in libsxlt**.

Thinking about the upgrade path here, as there is a _package_ name
change, that may not show up in a pkgutil -UC, etc.  I wanted the
updated of CSWlibxslt to trigger the removal of the old package name,
thus pointing the path to the name change.

> Since there seem to be zero dependancies on CSWpylibxslt, I wont
> strongly object to the rename there. But you do need to remove it
> from the C lib package, and you'll need to announce the change
> (announce list) when the package is fixed and released.

Roger that.  If you want a re-roll without the I in the C lib, I also
won't strongly object, I just thought it would ease the name change.

-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 10:24:57 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:24:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_astng, pylint
Message-ID: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>

A Python static code checker, plus a dependency.

* py_logilab_astng: new package
  + py_logilab_astng-0.20.3,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pylint: new package
  + pylint-0.21.3,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Can you remove the CSWpychecker package from the catalog? - it serves the same
purpose, but is unmaintained and doesn't work well.

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 17:32:29 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:32:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
Message-ID: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Two new packages with Python libraries.  The package name is is based on the
sonames: "libpython2.5.so.1.0" and "libpython2.5.so.1.0". CSWlibpython2-5-1-0
isn't going to win package name beauty contests, but it is justified by the
soname and unique.

This is probably the first and the last release of libpython2_5_1_0.

There is one more change: the libpython2.6.so symlink has been moved to
python_devel, where it belongs.  I released the check for .so symlinks, it
seems like a lot of packages need to move that one from library packages to
*_devel; you might see those files being moved in upcoming releases.

Updating all related packages too, so that the revisions are kept in sync.

* libpython2: new package
  + libpython2_5_1_0-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpython2_5_1_0-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpython2_6_1_0-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpython2_6_1_0-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* python: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.09.02
  -   to: 2010.10.12
  + idle-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_devel-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_devel-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_tk-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_tk-2.6.6,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 12 17:36:59 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:36:59 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <1286842958-sup-2692@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201010100046.o9A0k5nF009293@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTincPesQyeBgXxa5H5oD=Df1USdppqPEFhWdwxwz@mail.gmail.com>
	<1286842958-sup-2692@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinmgn9pPHsO8DMbuY__HUHpm=bpC03qPoAh6wVv@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, October 11, 2010, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Oct 11 13:52:58 -0400 2010:
>
>> 1. you seem to be wanting to change the PKG name of py_libxslt, and
>> ? ?you did not mention it
>
> Yes, and I realized after hitting the 'fire' button that I'd omitted
> that.
>
>> 2. you added a conflict to the older package
>
> Yup.
>
>> 3. You also added a conflict to CSWpylibxslt, **in libsxlt**.
>
> Thinking about the upgrade path here, as there is a _package_ name
> change, that may not show up in a pkgutil -UC, etc. ?I wanted the
> updated of CSWlibxslt to trigger the removal of the old package name,
> thus pointing the path to the name change.
>
>> Since there seem to be zero dependancies on CSWpylibxslt, I wont
>> strongly object to the rename there. But you do need to remove it
>> from the C lib package, and you'll need to announce the change
>> (announce list) when the package is fixed and released.
>
> Roger that. ?If you want a re-roll without the I in the C lib, I also
> won't strongly object, I just thought it would ease the name change


yes please redo

From ai at vsu.ru  Tue Oct 12 17:08:38 2010
From: ai at vsu.ru (Andy Igoshin)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:08:38 +0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.8.52
Message-ID: <201010121908.38073.ai@vsu.ru>

Hi!

nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                  
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                    
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                   


-- 
Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 18:14:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:14:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Fwd: [csw-devel] SF.net SVN: gar:[11265]
	csw/mgar/pkg/nginx/trunk/Makefile
References: <E1P5cjp-0003BL-Mk@sfp-svn-5.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com>
Message-ID: <F12B1552-9523-4730-802B-CAF7124618B6@opencsw.org>

Hi Andy,

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:

> Von: aigoshin at users.sourceforge.net
> Datum: 12. Oktober 2010 13:09:45 MESZ
> An: devel at lists.opencsw.org
> Betreff: [csw-devel] SF.net SVN: gar:[11265] csw/mgar/pkg/nginx/ 
> trunk/Makefile
> Antwort an: Broadcasts commit logs for build descriptions and GAR <devel at lists.opencsw.org 
> >
>
> Revision: 11265
>          http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/gar/?rev=11265&view=rev
> Author:   aigoshin
> Date:     2010-10-12 11:09:45 +0000 (Tue, 12 Oct 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> nginx: package release 20101012
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>    csw/mgar/pkg/nginx/trunk/Makefile
>
> Modified: csw/mgar/pkg/nginx/trunk/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- csw/mgar/pkg/nginx/trunk/Makefile	2010-10-12 10:28:06 UTC (rev  
> 11264)
> +++ csw/mgar/pkg/nginx/trunk/Makefile	2010-10-12 11:09:45 UTC (rev  
> 11265)
> @@ -25,15 +25,17 @@
> PACKAGING_PLATFORMS += solaris10-sparc solaris10-i386
>
> EXTRA_BUILD_ISAS_i386  = pentium_pro amd64
> -EXTRA_BUILD_ISAS_sparc = sparcv8plus sparcv9
> +EXTRA_BUILD_ISAS_sparc = sparcv9
>
> NGINXCPU_i386        = pentium
> NGINXCPU_pentium_pro = pentium3
> -NGINXCPU_sparcv8plus = sparc32
> +NGINXCPU_sparcv8     = sparc32
> NGINXCPU_sparcv9     = sparc64
> NGINXCPU_$(ISA)     ?= $(ISA)
> NGINXCPU             = $(NGINXCPU_$(ISA))
>
> +CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWnginx += binary-architecture-does-not-match- 
> placement|file=opt/csw/sbin/sparcv8/nginx|arch_id=18| 
> arch_name=sparcv8+
> +

Please do not overwrite this test. It means that the package is not
runnable on all supported platforms as it should. The problem is
that in the absence of -xarch the default ISA is sparcv8+, so you
basically have to patche the configure/make system to pass-through
the -xarch=v8.


Best regards

   -- Dago

> CFLAGS =
>
> sysconfdir=/etc/opt/csw
>
>
> This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development  
> platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 12 20:22:20 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:22:20 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/12/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Two new packages with Python libraries.  The package name is is based on the
> sonames: "libpython2.5.so.1.0" and "libpython2.5.so.1.0".
> CSWlibpython2-5-1-0
> isn't going to win package name beauty contests, but it is justified by the
> soname and unique.
>
> This is probably the first and the last release of libpython2_5_1_0.
>

Sooo.. why do we NEED this, for python?

My understanding is that nothing benefits from depending on
libpython.so.anything directly.
Things have to pull in the entire (or almost entire) package, or
python doesnt work.

So if there is no "python251" any more, why do we need a "libpython251" ?

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 12 20:23:37 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:23:37 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_astng, pylint
In-Reply-To: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinyy=qk8SywzUGk0yKA0WzenbE9SyPBaOZF1-FX@mail.gmail.com>

Do these require the "new" python in newpkgs?
If they run with the old existing python, I can release them right away.


On 10/12/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> A Python static code checker, plus a dependency.
>
> * py_logilab_astng: new package
>   + py_logilab_astng-0.20.3,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pylint: new package
>   + pylint-0.21.3,REV=2010.10.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Can you remove the CSWpychecker package from the catalog? - it serves the
> same
> purpose, but is unmaintained and doesn't work well.
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 12 20:24:22 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:24:22 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.8.52
In-Reply-To: <201010121908.38073.ai@vsu.ru>
References: <201010121908.38073.ai@vsu.ru>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimHeoayF1pMctx1YYj6Lud96UEB-1EYF4-vwFp1@mail.gmail.com>

Not seeing files for this.

On 10/12/10, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
> Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 20:31:33 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:31:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_astng, pylint
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinyy=qk8SywzUGk0yKA0WzenbE9SyPBaOZF1-FX@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinyy=qk8SywzUGk0yKA0WzenbE9SyPBaOZF1-FX@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinJJuwFokNcfwnc8ffW6JDf4sXe7XFbmUR+27=c@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 19:23, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> Do these require the "new" python in newpkgs?
> If they run with the old existing python, I can release them right away.

They work with the existing CSWpython.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 20:46:05 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:46:05 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 19:22, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> On 10/12/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Two new packages with Python libraries. ?The package name is is based on the
>> sonames: "libpython2.5.so.1.0" and "libpython2.5.so.1.0".
>> CSWlibpython2-5-1-0
>> isn't going to win package name beauty contests, but it is justified by the
>> soname and unique.
>>
>> This is probably the first and the last release of libpython2_5_1_0.
>>
>
> Sooo.. why do we NEED this, for python?
>
> My understanding is that nothing benefits from depending on
> libpython.so.anything directly.
> Things have to pull in the entire (or almost entire) package, or
> python doesnt work.
>
> So if there is no "python251" any more, why do we need a "libpython251" ?

You mean, the shared libraries?  The same reason as with all other
shared libraries: there are binaries linking to them, and removing
shared objects would break these binaries.  I don't know exactly what
kind of functionality they provide to other binaries, perhaps with
Python 2.5 not installed any more, the Python-related functionality
wouldn't work.  Or maybe it's some kind of API that allows to process
.py files, so the functionality would still work.  But it doesn't
matter that much; in either case the shared library is required for
other binaries to do runtime linking.

The list of dependent packages is here:
http://www.opencsw.org/packagesContainingFile/?fileName=libpython2.5.so.1.0

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 20:54:55 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:54:55 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.8.52
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimHeoayF1pMctx1YYj6Lud96UEB-1EYF4-vwFp1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121908.38073.ai@vsu.ru>
	<AANLkTimHeoayF1pMctx1YYj6Lud96UEB-1EYF4-vwFp1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AD030212-60A0-46D2-BFB6-2A99F624E4B5@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 12.10.2010 um 20:24 schrieb Philip Brown:
> Not seeing files for this.

Andy discovered an issue regarding sparcv8plus and hence removed
them for now. My answer is cc'ed to maintainers at .


Best regards

   -- Dago

> On 10/12/10, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
>> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
>> Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 12 21:07:16 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:07:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimoQ+qxL0+0Ba=ekffGpfwXyJhQCnQTxrFAJyKN@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 19:46, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> wouldn't work. ?Or maybe it's some kind of API that allows to process
> .py files, so the functionality would still work.

I just checked that the 2.6 interpreter can work with the PIL library,
which uses binaries linked against libpython2.5.so.1.0.

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 12 21:22:04 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:22:04 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_astng, pylint
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJJuwFokNcfwnc8ffW6JDf4sXe7XFbmUR+27=c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinyy=qk8SywzUGk0yKA0WzenbE9SyPBaOZF1-FX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinJJuwFokNcfwnc8ffW6JDf4sXe7XFbmUR+27=c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-hWxQpjpxpmNsBvcP+afMy+0Da3M5M_PdVYpe@mail.gmail.com>

ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
'/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/logilab/__init__.py' for key 1
DB Update failed. Possibly a filename collision

and pylint depends on that, so I cant accept pylint yet either.





On 10/12/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 19:23, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> escreveu:
>> Do these require the "new" python in newpkgs?
>> If they run with the old existing python, I can release them right away.
>
> They work with the existing CSWpython.
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 12 21:27:15 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:27:15 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinRu9pDnJP5SX=eXV51rs68wa74uwMimms4nEzA@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/12/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 19:22, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> escreveu:

>> So if there is no "python251" any more, why do we need a "libpython251" ?
>
> You mean, the shared libraries?  The same reason as with all other
> shared libraries: there are binaries linking to them, and removing
> shared objects would break these binaries[....]  But it doesn't
> matter that much; in either case the shared library is required for
> other binaries to do runtime linking.
>

oh, blah.
I was going to say 'since packages needing the lib only depend on
CSWpython, I dont see the point in splitting this out', but I just
realized the point: you donthave to re-upload the same old lib when
you do updates of python this way.

Dependencies still get a little hairy, though. This is reminicent of
the old "python_rt" package that we USED to have.  packages used to
depend on THAT, but not the core python package.
We might want to redo dependency trees for this.
if we were starting fresh, I might say have the shared libs depend on CSWpython.
But since older packages only depend on CSWpython now, it will be a
requirement for CSWpython, to pull in shared lib(s) as deps. Circular
deps arent allowed, so that wont work.

>From now on, (unmodified) checkpkg would only detect a needed
dependency on the libpython package, not CSWpython any more. What's
the plan to handle that sort of thing?

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 13 02:37:01 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:37:01 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
Message-ID: <201010130037.o9D0b1ai016674@login.bo.opencsw.org>

As requested without the I dep in libxslt.  I'll send the mail to
announce@ when you note the batch is queued up.

Thanks
-Ben

* libxslt: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08
  -   to: 1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13
  + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 13 09:47:59 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:47:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_astng, pylint
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik-hWxQpjpxpmNsBvcP+afMy+0Da3M5M_PdVYpe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinyy=qk8SywzUGk0yKA0WzenbE9SyPBaOZF1-FX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinJJuwFokNcfwnc8ffW6JDf4sXe7XFbmUR+27=c@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik-hWxQpjpxpmNsBvcP+afMy+0Da3M5M_PdVYpe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim0hh6ThX29UM6XG5cJPSc+nE=G8d3MYBakX-mr@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 20:22, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
> '/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/logilab/__init__.py' for key 1
> DB Update failed. Possibly a filename collision
>
> and pylint depends on that, so I cant accept pylint yet either.

Right.  Here's the updated package:

* py_logilab_astng: new package
  + py_logilab_astng-0.20.3,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

I really need to catch these errors at an earlier level, so they don't
get sent to you.  That'll be my next checkpkg subproject.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 13 10:07:40 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:07:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinRu9pDnJP5SX=eXV51rs68wa74uwMimms4nEzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinRu9pDnJP5SX=eXV51rs68wa74uwMimms4nEzA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ScJ80_oQ63X-1dTze5pvBJL7CJGfnt7LZSkGu@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 20:27, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> oh, blah.
> I was going to say 'since packages needing the lib only depend on
> CSWpython, I dont see the point in splitting this out', but I just
> realized the point: you donthave to re-upload the same old lib when
> you do updates of python this way.

Yes, that's it.

> Dependencies still get a little hairy, though. This is reminicent of
> the old "python_rt" package that we USED to have.

Yes, it'll contain almost exactly the same files, but won't be called
a runtime package any more, since in the case of Python, the
interpreter is the runtime, from the point of view of Python programs.

> packages used to
> depend on THAT, but not the core python package.
> We might want to redo dependency trees for this.
> if we were starting fresh, I might say have the shared libs depend on CSWpython.
> But since older packages only depend on CSWpython now, it will be a
> requirement for CSWpython, to pull in shared lib(s) as deps. Circular
> deps arent allowed, so that wont work.

Dependencies will, ahem, depend on package contents.  If there's a
Python module that has a shared object linking against libpython,
it'll need to depend on both CSWpython and CSWlibpython*.  Each
dependency for a different reason: *.py files need the interpreter,
*.so files need libpython2.x.so.1.0.

> >From now on, (unmodified) checkpkg would only detect a needed
> dependency on the libpython package, not CSWpython any more. What's
> the plan to handle that sort of thing?

This has already been taken care of, we don't need to modify checkpkg.
 The heuristic is that if a package contains *.py files, it requires
the interpreter.  When we release Python 2.7 and 3.1, things will get
more complicated, we'll need to look at the file headers and
distinguish between, say, #!/opt/csw/bin/python,
#!/opt/csw/bin/python2.6, #!/opt/csw/bin/python2.7, #!/usr/bin/env
python2.7, etc., to choose whether to depend on the generic CSWpython,
or a specific CSWpython27, CSWpython31, etc.  We'll also need not just
py_foo, but more specifically py26_foo, py31_foo, etc.  But I think
I'm getting ahead of myself, as I haven't built 2.7 nor 3.1 yet.

Back to the main topic, unmodified checkpkg already handles that, so
there will be no issues with dependencies.

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct 13 18:51:05 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:51:05 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <201010130037.o9D0b1ai016674@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010130037.o9D0b1ai016674@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WfDXe2StHZ9ez5No34UZo+et5zuxcYmEGPgSa@mail.gmail.com>

well, i WAS going to say it was batched.
but then i hit a problem with py_libxslt.

ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
'/opt/csw/include/pycairo/pycairo.h' for key 1


conflicts with CSWpycairo.


On 10/12/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> As requested without the I dep in libxslt.  I'll send the mail to
> announce@ when you note the batch is queued up.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
>
> * libxslt: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08
>   -   to: 1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13
>   + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libxslt_devel-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + py_libxslt-1.1.26,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct 13 18:53:11 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:53:11 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ScJ80_oQ63X-1dTze5pvBJL7CJGfnt7LZSkGu@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinRu9pDnJP5SX=eXV51rs68wa74uwMimms4nEzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ScJ80_oQ63X-1dTze5pvBJL7CJGfnt7LZSkGu@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimSPNJUZ-VQcnS6cLSDxrkcFfd0D7ssdw3nco07@mail.gmail.com>

okay. batching...

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct 13 18:55:03 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:55:03 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_logilab_astng, pylint
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0hh6ThX29UM6XG5cJPSc+nE=G8d3MYBakX-mr@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010120824.o9C8Ovcs010139@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinyy=qk8SywzUGk0yKA0WzenbE9SyPBaOZF1-FX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinJJuwFokNcfwnc8ffW6JDf4sXe7XFbmUR+27=c@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik-hWxQpjpxpmNsBvcP+afMy+0Da3M5M_PdVYpe@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim0hh6ThX29UM6XG5cJPSc+nE=G8d3MYBakX-mr@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwMgQpFv7MZTAAHycyrfWcopLLJ5vh-0Ajjobk@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/13/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 12 de Outubro de 2010 20:22, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> escreveu:
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
>> '/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/logilab/__init__.py' for key 1
>> DB Update failed. Possibly a filename collision
>>
>> and pylint depends on that, so I cant accept pylint yet either.
>
> Right.  Here's the updated package:
>
> * py_logilab_astng: new package
>   + py_logilab_astng-0.20.3,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> I really need to catch these errors at an earlier level, so they don't
> get sent to you.  That'll be my next checkpkg subproject.
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 13 18:54:49 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:54:49 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, libpython2_5_1_0,
	libpython2_6_(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimSPNJUZ-VQcnS6cLSDxrkcFfd0D7ssdw3nco07@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010121532.o9CFWTb6025738@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinF_gBaBiEVQfNg3+_atu0OY7OQ5e=3O+iO7aPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=-nJ4purkzXFn8aMMS+tPXj7rPPbC+JprBKrkk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinRu9pDnJP5SX=eXV51rs68wa74uwMimms4nEzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ScJ80_oQ63X-1dTze5pvBJL7CJGfnt7LZSkGu@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimSPNJUZ-VQcnS6cLSDxrkcFfd0D7ssdw3nco07@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimfeEJuZMsWn-EVBXsm9pNwubCy1kLOq+OB9_dW@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 13 de Outubro de 2010 17:53, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> okay. batching...

Yey!

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 13 20:46:56 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pkgconfig, tcsh
Message-ID: <201010131846.o9DIkuBX028538@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This is now compiled with 64 bit file offsets for files >2GB

* tcsh: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.09.10
  -   to: 2010.10.13
  + tcsh-6.17.00,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tcsh-6.17.00,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

This would have been finished month ago if there weren't been this crappy testsuite.
All patched now :-P

* pkgconfig: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.23,REV=2009.04.23
  -   to: 0.25,REV=2010.10.13
  + pkgconfig-0.25,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pkgconfig-0.25,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Oct 13 21:18:34 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:18:34 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pkgconfig, tcsh
In-Reply-To: <201010131846.o9DIkuBX028538@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010131846.o9DIkuBX028538@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimaEm8hTGte=kPanqPTjPFwFxuu9JgRHTzt2vQk@mail.gmail.com>

great, batched



On 10/13/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This is now compiled with 64 bit file offsets for files >2GB
>
> * tcsh: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.09.10
>   -   to: 2010.10.13
>   + tcsh-6.17.00,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + tcsh-6.17.00,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> This would have been finished month ago if there weren't been this crappy
> testsuite.
> All patched now :-P
>
> * pkgconfig: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.23,REV=2009.04.23
>   -   to: 0.25,REV=2010.10.13
>   + pkgconfig-0.25,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pkgconfig-0.25,REV=2010.10.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 14 10:32:01 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:32:01 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs scons
Message-ID: <201010140832.o9E8W1xM015465@login.bo.opencsw.org>

A take over from Dago.

* scons: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2.0,REV=2010.01.06
  -   to: 1.3.1,REV=2010.10.14
  + scons-1.3.1,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 14 10:34:45 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:34:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_twisted, twisted
Message-ID: <201010140834.o9E8YjM8015553@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Twisted packages renamed to follow the naming policy, and depending on the new
Python shared library package.

When I rebuild buildbot to depend on CSWpy-twisted, I'll ask for removal of
CSWtwisted from the catalog.

* py_twisted: new package
  + py_twisted-10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_twisted-10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* twisted: major version upgrade
  - from: 9.0.0,REV=2010.03.23
  -   to: 10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14
  + twisted-10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ai at vsu.ru  Wed Oct 13 00:00:53 2010
From: ai at vsu.ru (Andy Igoshin)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:00:53 +0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.8.52 re-submitted
Message-ID: <201010130200.53529.ai@vsu.ru>

Hi!

nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                  
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                    
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                   


-- 
Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia

From opk at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 14 12:46:12 2010
From: opk at opencsw.org (Oliver Kiddle)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:46:12 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_nose
Message-ID: <20101014104612.1C0F8168@mail.opencsw.org>

* py_nose: new package
  + py_nose-0.11.2,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ai at vsu.ru  Thu Oct 14 20:06:29 2010
From: ai at vsu.ru (Andy Igoshin)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:06:29 +0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nginx 0.8.52
Message-ID: <201010142206.29738.ai@vsu.ru>

Hi!

nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                  
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                    
nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz                                                                   


-- 
Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 15 01:26:33 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:26:33 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nginx 0.8.52
In-Reply-To: <201010142206.29738.ai@vsu.ru>
References: <201010142206.29738.ai@vsu.ru>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=hjA3A9BXZ_oXtavVXo5-zwQY_G5Me=7cO0d_1@mail.gmail.com>

yup yup tyaken care of.


On 10/14/10, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> nginx-0.8.52,REV=2010.10.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
> Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 15 03:09:33 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:09:33 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=WfDXe2StHZ9ez5No34UZo+et5zuxcYmEGPgSa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010130037.o9D0b1ai016674@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=WfDXe2StHZ9ez5No34UZo+et5zuxcYmEGPgSa@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1287104727-sup-6176@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Oct 13 12:51:05 -0400 2010:
> well, i WAS going to say it was batched.
> but then i hit a problem with py_libxslt.
> 
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
> '/opt/csw/include/pycairo/pycairo.h' for key 1

Ok, so I finally got to actually look at this.  I'm scratching my
head.  I pkgtrans'd both package files sitting in newpkgs on bender
and there is no pycairo.h file or similar entry in the pkgmap.

Bug in your scripts or were you looking at another package???

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 15 08:07:50 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:07:50 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <1287104727-sup-6176@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201010130037.o9D0b1ai016674@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=WfDXe2StHZ9ez5No34UZo+et5zuxcYmEGPgSa@mail.gmail.com>
	<1287104727-sup-6176@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKCfq1Ha84gO7go4vUgkiBW36mrofvqrT9W930@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 15 de Outubro de 2010 02:09, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Oct 13 12:51:05 -0400 2010:
>> well, i WAS going to say it was batched.
>> but then i hit a problem with py_libxslt.
>>
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
>> '/opt/csw/include/pycairo/pycairo.h' for key 1
>
> Ok, so I finally got to actually look at this. ?I'm scratching my
> head. ?I pkgtrans'd both package files sitting in newpkgs on bender
> and there is no pycairo.h file or similar entry in the pkgmap.
>
> Bug in your scripts or were you looking at another package???

Here are extracted metadata from this package:
http://pkg.opencsw.org/pkgbrowser/reports/pkgbrowse-bwalton.html#a135b68014ff1d2fa20e9082bcb6aa92

Searching the whole page for "pycairo" yields nothing, doesn't look
like pycairo.h is in any of these packages.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 15 15:17:47 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:17:47 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
Message-ID: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>

NSPR: Upgrade to 4.8.6.

Renamed the nspr packages to libnspr4.  This submission provides empty
transitional packages.  When I rebuild nss to link to CSWlibnspr4,
I'll ask for removal of CSWnspr and CSWnspr-devel.

* libnspr4: new package
  + libnspr4-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* nspr_devel: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.02.27
  -   to: 2010.10.15
  + nspr_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* nspr: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.11.26
  -   to: 2010.10.15
  + nspr-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 15 20:22:05 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:22:05 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_twisted, twisted
In-Reply-To: <201010140834.o9E8YjM8015553@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010140834.o9E8YjM8015553@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=EX8KHXBjWD5J2ap-bLEFPNAenCEEoBve+=OZF@mail.gmail.com>

caused a bit of problems for me, that you moved a binary from twisted,
to py_twisted, and didnt notify me about that. caused a file conflict.
happily i figured it out, reversed order, and its in batch now :)


On 10/14/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Twisted packages renamed to follow the naming policy, and depending on the
> new
> Python shared library package.
>
> When I rebuild buildbot to depend on CSWpy-twisted, I'll ask for removal of
> CSWtwisted from the catalog.
>
> * py_twisted: new package
>   + py_twisted-10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + py_twisted-10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * twisted: major version upgrade
>   - from: 9.0.0,REV=2010.03.23
>   -   to: 10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14
>   + twisted-10.1.0,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 15 20:22:27 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:22:27 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_nose
In-Reply-To: <20101014104612.1C0F8168@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101014104612.1C0F8168@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimqaj3c31hZk_S_-TJCSHLbjTE=HbnOEED4yMKy@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/14/10, Oliver Kiddle <opk at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * py_nose: new package
>   + py_nose-0.11.2,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 15 20:52:46 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:52:46 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxslt, libxslt_devel, py_libxslt
In-Reply-To: <1287104727-sup-6176@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201010130037.o9D0b1ai016674@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=WfDXe2StHZ9ez5No34UZo+et5zuxcYmEGPgSa@mail.gmail.com>
	<1287104727-sup-6176@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikE3DaxW4NDNu=cTgKdGKyZx1n3W3C9wUPTzbnF@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/14/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Oct 13 12:51:05 -0400 2010:
>> well, i WAS going to say it was batched.
>> but then i hit a problem with py_libxslt.
>>
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 6: Duplicate entry
>> '/opt/csw/include/pycairo/pycairo.h' for key 1
>
> Ok, so I finally got to actually look at this.  I'm scratching my
> head.  I pkgtrans'd both package files sitting in newpkgs on bender
> and there is no pycairo.h file or similar entry in the pkgmap.
>
> Bug in your scripts or were you looking at another package???
>

Hmm. apologies.. not sure what happened there.

BUt now there are two remaining issues, unfortunately:

1. the whole /opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages thing

2. PKG name change.

I've batched the libxslt* packages,but py_libxslt is still sitting in
newpkgs because of above.

Well, given that nothing depends on it, the PKG name change isnt so
much of a big deal, now that I know about it. But have to see what
Maciej says about the python2.6 thing now.

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 15 23:10:24 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:10:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>

i was just oging to pass it through.... then i just noticed, that you
only have sparc packages for the lib?? !!



On 10/15/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> NSPR: Upgrade to 4.8.6.
>
> Renamed the nspr packages to libnspr4.  This submission provides empty
> transitional packages.  When I rebuild nss to link to CSWlibnspr4,
> I'll ask for removal of CSWnspr and CSWnspr-devel.
>
> * libnspr4: new package
>   + libnspr4-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * nspr_devel: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2010.02.27
>   -   to: 2010.10.15
>   + nspr_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * nspr: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.11.26
>   -   to: 2010.10.15
>   + nspr-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 16 01:03:12 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:03:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 15 de Outubro de 2010 22:10, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> i was just oging to pass it through.... then i just noticed, that you
> only have sparc packages for the lib?? !!

That must have been an omission, sorry.  I'll resubmit.  I'll also try
to make submitpkg indicate when one architecture is present, but the
other is not.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 16 01:17:14 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:17:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 00:03, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> No dia 15 de Outubro de 2010 22:10, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>> i was just oging to pass it through.... then i just noticed, that you
>> only have sparc packages for the lib?? !!
>
> That must have been an omission, sorry. ?I'll resubmit. ?I'll also try
> to make submitpkg indicate when one architecture is present, but the
> other is not.

Done, here's the complete set of packages.  There were file moves; the
CSWnspr* packages are now empty, files were moved to CSWlibnspr4*.

* nspr: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.11.26
  -   to: 2010.10.16
  + nspr-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* libnspr4: new package
  + libnspr4-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libnspr4-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* nspr_devel: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.02.27
  -   to: 2010.10.16
  + nspr_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + nspr_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 16 01:00:27 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:00:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_twisted, twisted
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=EX8KHXBjWD5J2ap-bLEFPNAenCEEoBve+=OZF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010140834.o9E8YjM8015553@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=EX8KHXBjWD5J2ap-bLEFPNAenCEEoBve+=OZF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxrYc0f_sWvQHutB5Paj-j607XNO7vJfMU3=jv@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 15 de Outubro de 2010 19:22, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> caused a bit of problems for me, that you moved a binary from twisted,
> to py_twisted, and didnt notify me about that. caused a file conflict.
> happily i figured it out, reversed order, and its in batch now :)

Sorry about that; I'll make sure it's indicated in the future in the
description.  There's a similar thing going on with the nspr packages.

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct 16 02:03:25 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:03:25 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>

Errr... not seeing the new files...




On 10/15/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 00:03, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>> No dia 15 de Outubro de 2010 22:10, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
>> escreveu:
>>> i was just oging to pass it through.... then i just noticed, that you
>>> only have sparc packages for the lib?? !!
>>
>> That must have been an omission, sorry. ?I'll resubmit. ?I'll also try
>> to make submitpkg indicate when one architecture is present, but the
>> other is not.
>
> Done, here's the complete set of packages.  There were file moves; the
> CSWnspr* packages are now empty, files were moved to CSWlibnspr4*.
>
> * nspr: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.11.26
>   -   to: 2010.10.16
>   + nspr-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libnspr4: new package
>   + libnspr4-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnspr4-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * nspr_devel: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2010.02.27
>   -   to: 2010.10.16
>   + nspr_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + nspr_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 16 02:13:08 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:13:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 01:03, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> Errr... not seeing the new files...

I could sworn I copied them.  Perhaps I removed them by accident when
removing previously built packages from newpkgs.

New packages in /home/newpkgs are now Verified(tm) to actually be there.

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Oct 16 02:17:36 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:17:36 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>

sigh.

CSWlibnspr4-devel
ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 194: Duplicate entry
'/opt/csw/share/aclocal/nspr.m4' for key 1


On 10/15/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 01:03, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> escreveu:
>> Errr... not seeing the new files...
>
> I could sworn I copied them.  Perhaps I removed them by accident when
> removing previously built packages from newpkgs.
>
> New packages in /home/newpkgs are now Verified(tm) to actually be there.
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 16 02:27:52 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:27:52 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=mUHD-ym1cwg8xfpYOn_-2GcTwPg7rqDeWagbZ@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 01:17, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> sigh.
>
> CSWlibnspr4-devel
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 194: Duplicate entry
> '/opt/csw/share/aclocal/nspr.m4' for key 1

Hm.  This file is only in:

libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

To which package does the other instance of the file belong?  If
CSWnspr-devel, try importing it first and only then CSWlibnspr4-devel.
 Or, change the import procedure to first remove files from all the
packages from the group an only then insert new data.

From ai at vsu.ru  Fri Oct 15 23:44:11 2010
From: ai at vsu.ru (Andy Igoshin)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:44:11 +0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs proftpd 1.3.3b
Message-ID: <201010160144.11233.ai@vsu.ru>

Hi!

proftpd-1.3.3b,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
proftpd-1.3.3b,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


-- 
Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Oct 17 19:20:56 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:20:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=mUHD-ym1cwg8xfpYOn_-2GcTwPg7rqDeWagbZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=mUHD-ym1cwg8xfpYOn_-2GcTwPg7rqDeWagbZ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=sbwGYCKJ8sZDZNc+f6YP7Fi-E7jjkM_K=YwQg@mail.gmail.com>

sorry thought I had mentioned it.
it's in Mozilla

On Friday, October 15, 2010, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 01:17, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>> sigh.
>>
>> CSWlibnspr4-devel
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 194: Duplicate entry
>> '/opt/csw/share/aclocal/nspr.m4' for key 1
>
> Hm. ?This file is only in:
>
> libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libnspr4_devel-4.8.6,REV=2010.10.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> To which package does the other instance of the file belong? ?If
> CSWnspr-devel, try importing it first and only then CSWlibnspr4-devel.
> ?Or, change the import procedure to first remove files from all the
> packages from the group an only then insert new data.
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From opk at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 18 11:56:36 2010
From: opk at opencsw.org (Oliver Kiddle)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:56:36 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_dateutil, py_tz
Message-ID: <20101018095636.22091E06@mail.opencsw.org>

* py_tz: new package
  + py_tz-2010l,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* py_dateutil: new package
  + py_dateutil-1.5,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 18 13:35:09 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:35:09 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs adobereader
Message-ID: <201010181135.o9IBZ99C022001@login.bo.opencsw.org>

There is no version update, this just fixes #4577 reported by James
for the Sparc build only.

* adobereader: major version upgrade
  - from: 9.4.0,REV=2010.10.11
  -   to: 8.1.7,REV=2010.10.18
  + adobereader-8.1.7,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 18 15:02:52 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mtools
Message-ID: <201010181302.o9ID2qvS029905@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* mtools: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 4.0.13,REV=2010.03.01
  -   to: 4.0.15,REV=2010.10.18
  + mtools-4.0.15,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + mtools-4.0.15,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 18 15:28:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:28:02 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mantis
Message-ID: <201010181328.o9IDS2Md012747@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* mantis: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.1.8,REV=2009.10.30
  -   to: 1.2.3,REV=2010.10.18
  + mantis-1.2.3,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 18 15:51:42 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:51:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs shmux
Message-ID: <201010181351.o9IDpgih008550@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* shmux: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.0.1,REV=2007.11.14
  -   to: 1.0.2,REV=2010.10.18
  + shmux-1.0.2,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + shmux-1.0.2,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 18 19:58:34 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:58:34 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_dateutil, py_tz
In-Reply-To: <20101018095636.22091E06@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101018095636.22091E06@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wxhFnFxxLg5JdMVqQTgfyOK8deqqrs0+3TtWi@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/18/10, Oliver Kiddle <opk at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * py_tz: new package
>   + py_tz-2010l,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * py_dateutil: new package
>   + py_dateutil-1.5,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 18 19:59:52 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:59:52 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs shmux
In-Reply-To: <201010181351.o9IDpgih008550@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010181351.o9IDpgih008550@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTiknN5s+vh=pMhoQ_7Jtb79DN+wTiWaKo4eWQZcN@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 10/18/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * shmux: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 1.0.1,REV=2007.11.14
>   -   to: 1.0.2,REV=2010.10.18
>   + shmux-1.0.2,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + shmux-1.0.2,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 18 20:07:25 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:07:25 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mantis
In-Reply-To: <201010181328.o9IDS2Md012747@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010181328.o9IDS2Md012747@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimXnxKZ3caq6Lc0ifebfDVts0bA8gYr9hi6ZM3D@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 10/18/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * mantis: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 1.1.8,REV=2009.10.30
>   -   to: 1.2.3,REV=2010.10.18
>   + mantis-1.2.3,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 18 20:11:37 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:11:37 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=sbwGYCKJ8sZDZNc+f6YP7Fi-E7jjkM_K=YwQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=mUHD-ym1cwg8xfpYOn_-2GcTwPg7rqDeWagbZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=sbwGYCKJ8sZDZNc+f6YP7Fi-E7jjkM_K=YwQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi==LUSoD5K=YLb3tNgpfGqDA9L8Pj_LdkNubk=e@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 17 de Outubro de 2010 18:20, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> sorry thought I had mentioned it.
> it's in Mozilla

I see.  I'll ask William to remove these headers, and I'll write file
collission check before I resubmit nspr.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 18 21:40:01 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:40:01 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs proftpd 1.3.3b
In-Reply-To: <201010160144.11233.ai@vsu.ru>
References: <201010160144.11233.ai@vsu.ru>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinZBNY-49xeYTFca4Y1MOQsybOyxOVEmzJD9bAy@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks. batched.


On 10/15/10, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> proftpd-1.3.3b,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> proftpd-1.3.3b,REV=2010.10.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> --
> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
> Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 18 21:41:45 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:41:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs adobereader
In-Reply-To: <201010181135.o9IBZ99C022001@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010181135.o9IBZ99C022001@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikPACXXTFPGnfq_303kQzzDy7ngsu6_857uY3KQ@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On 10/18/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> There is no version update, this just fixes #4577 reported by James
> for the Sparc build only.
>
> * adobereader: major version upgrade
>   - from: 9.4.0,REV=2010.10.11
>   -   to: 8.1.7,REV=2010.10.18
>   + adobereader-8.1.7,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 18 21:45:31 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:45:31 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mtools
In-Reply-To: <201010181302.o9ID2qvS029905@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010181302.o9ID2qvS029905@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin5c_gXqmtwD7Cuqpu-9Yzer=+OOEgb+a6sxoBV@mail.gmail.com>

batched.


On 10/18/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * mtools: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 4.0.13,REV=2010.03.01
>   -   to: 4.0.15,REV=2010.10.18
>   + mtools-4.0.15,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + mtools-4.0.15,REV=2010.10.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 19 01:26:42 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:26:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimghereEfViVoXwLk4Z=VVfo-jjzuH0G4saBTa_@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 01:17, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> sigh.
>
> CSWlibnspr4-devel
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 194: Duplicate entry
> '/opt/csw/share/aclocal/nspr.m4' for key 1

I thought I could simply ask William to remove the .m4 file, but it
turned out that this is not seamonkey, but a dinosaur fossil:

http://www.opencsw.org/packages/mozilla/

What do you suggest doing?  Cutting Mozilla open, performing
nspr.m4omy and re-releasing the package?  Any other ideas?

Maciej

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 19 03:01:16 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:01:16 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs scons
In-Reply-To: <201010140832.o9E8W1xM015465@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010140832.o9E8W1xM015465@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikJM8hAN_UGwXpj+qm7deQLnuB4YuVoFL5ykETB@mail.gmail.com>

this was already batched, btw.


On 10/14/10, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> A take over from Dago.
>
> * scons: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 1.2.0,REV=2010.01.06
>   -   to: 1.3.1,REV=2010.10.14
>   + scons-1.3.1,REV=2010.10.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 19 03:04:24 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:04:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnspr4, libnspr4_devel, nspr,
	nspr_devel
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimghereEfViVoXwLk4Z=VVfo-jjzuH0G4saBTa_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010151317.o9FDHlxr014035@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=dH9F0qwry0tNiKc-qubt5iOd4UEHbMJ991O2=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUYY7jYvPSkMKZE-6SKUOkqfX_Zg0KU0okZoph@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_bGaJN9J+i8uBjbXeFv2mS-GCRyAKAKSR6Rha@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimX2u3jZEyzrDYtY1hX1egEf44M+FDdTrXTZ_CT@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTt=0tAm=Vi_NpcJKCE-PGgAG=pN0tUOWoBdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHA5Guurf6gU2B1p=TTH9v0bvKkZ2UH7cpPKVU@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimghereEfViVoXwLk4Z=VVfo-jjzuH0G4saBTa_@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=KZUL0E=pA0eamvh7Yqqnj5w3u+AjFOzh0720p@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/18/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 16 de Outubro de 2010 01:17, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> escreveu:
>> sigh.
>>
>> CSWlibnspr4-devel
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 194: Duplicate entry
>> '/opt/csw/share/aclocal/nspr.m4' for key 1
>
> I thought I could simply ask William to remove the .m4 file, but it
> turned out that this is not seamonkey, but a dinosaur fossil:
>
> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/mozilla/
>
> What do you suggest doing?  Cutting Mozilla open, performing
> nspr.m4omy and re-releasing the package?

thats the only "easy" suggestion

> Any other ideas?

..... update it? :)

oh wait, seamonkey is supposed to replace mozilla, I think?
trying to remember why we kept it.. perhaps it was "lighter" or something.
yes, by quite a bit.
much much fewer dependancies.
probably less of a memory hog too.


>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 19 03:11:10 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:11:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_prefork, ap2_suexec, ap2_worker,
	(...)
Message-ID: <201010190111.o9J1BAP4013068@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

These are the updated apache2 packages.  I've not received any
further feedback on them and they behaved well in my testing.

(There is no longer a request to place them in Rupert's care
as I've done almost a total reworking of things at this point...)

Thanks
-Ben

* apache2: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.2.13,REV=2009.08.22
  -   to: 2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09
  + ap2_prefork-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_suexec-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_suexec-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_worker-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_worker-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2_devel-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2_devel-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2_manual-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2rt-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 19 03:54:02 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:54:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_prefork, ap2_suexec, ap2_worker,
	(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010190111.o9J1BAP4013068@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010190111.o9J1BAP4013068@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimvO-oji=QvkvKH5dc8PwhtgNbFrRjTdDT7P7so@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks much. batching.


On 10/18/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> These are the updated apache2 packages.  I've not received any
> further feedback on them and they behaved well in my testing.
>
> (There is no longer a request to place them in Rupert's care
> as I've done almost a total reworking of things at this point...)
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
>
> * apache2: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 2.2.13,REV=2009.08.22
>   -   to: 2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09
>   + ap2_prefork-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ap2_suexec-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ap2_suexec-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ap2_worker-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ap2_worker-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apache2-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apache2-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apache2_devel-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apache2_devel-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apache2_manual-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apache2rt-2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From kester at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 20 15:00:56 2010
From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:00:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ndiff
Message-ID: <20101020130056.0FB1718B@mail.opencsw.org>

Hi All,

This is my first package, I hope I got things right.

* ndiff: new package
  + ndiff-2.00,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ndiff-2.00,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz


Regards

Kester
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 20 15:34:06 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:34:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ndiff
In-Reply-To: <20101020130056.0FB1718B@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101020130056.0FB1718B@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimXs0A+3=OzBELB1K+Ktan5PEaPYogJuapskNiR@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 20 de Outubro de 2010 14:00, Kester Habermann
<kester at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> This is my first package, I hope I got things right.

Yey Kester!

By the way, did you know that once you copy packages to experimental,
a report appears on the experimental page?

See here:
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#kester

...and click the "Report" link.

--Maciej

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 20 16:57:22 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:57:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsvncpp3, rapidsvn
Message-ID: <201010201457.o9KEvMj0019766@login.bo.opencsw.org>

*Finally* an update after such a long time...

* rapidsvn: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.9.6,REV=2008.04.13
  -   to: 0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20
  + rapidsvn-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rapidsvn-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libsvncpp3: new package
  + libsvncpp3-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libsvncpp3-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 20 17:02:48 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:02:48 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bitlbee
Message-ID: <201010201502.o9KF2mEO021082@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This was requested by JZU some time ago and seems to work ok.

* bitlbee: new package
  + bitlbee-1.2.8,REV=2010.08.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bitlbee-1.2.8,REV=2010.08.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 21 14:40:47 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:40:47 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_devel
Message-ID: <201010211240.o9LCelfH003319@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Adding new dependencies as per Mantis 4584.

* gar_devel: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.04.17
  -   to: 2010.10.21
  + gar_devel-1.0,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 21 14:54:25 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:54:25 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bind, bind_chroot, bind_devel,
	bind_u(...)
Message-ID: <201010211254.o9LCsP1I006127@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* bind: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 9.7.2,REV=2010.09.14
  -   to: 9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19
  + bind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_chroot-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_devel-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_utils-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_utils-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libbind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libbind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 21 15:18:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:18:02 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libcpptest0, libcpptest_devel,
	liburi(...)
Message-ID: <201010211318.o9LDI2HT007692@login.bo.opencsw.org>

One of the last missing libraries from Xiph.org with dependencies

* libxspf: new package
  + libxspf4-1.2.0,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxspf4-1.2.0,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxspf_devel-1.2.0,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxspf_devel-1.2.0,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libcpptest: new package
  + libcpptest0-1.1.1,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcpptest0-1.1.1,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcpptest_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcpptest_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* liburiparser: new package
  + liburiparser1-0.7.5,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + liburiparser1-0.7.5,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + liburiparser_devel-0.7.5,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + liburiparser_devel-0.7.5,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 22 00:42:26 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:42:26 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ndiff
In-Reply-To: <20101020130056.0FB1718B@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101020130056.0FB1718B@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim3TC2h+EP_xkYBNknwsMaaaDjwPbde2yFsDJDa@mail.gmail.com>

Looks quite clean. Nice first package. Thanks, Kester.



On 10/20/10, Kester Habermann <kester at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is my first package, I hope I got things right.
>
> * ndiff: new package
>   + ndiff-2.00,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ndiff-2.00,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 22 00:43:35 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:43:35 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bitlbee
In-Reply-To: <201010201502.o9KF2mEO021082@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010201502.o9KF2mEO021082@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimgrd+V2mNZUqn-=ORt412R39KX8AQawmNeVWrU@mail.gmail.com>

okay

On 10/20/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This was requested by JZU some time ago and seems to work ok.
>
> * bitlbee: new package
>   + bitlbee-1.2.8,REV=2010.08.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bitlbee-1.2.8,REV=2010.08.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 22 00:44:01 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:44:01 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_devel
In-Reply-To: <201010211240.o9LCelfH003319@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010211240.o9LCelfH003319@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=_FgsZRc--f4ORf-STw=F8vtHSURnuK3v9=ryf@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/21/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Adding new dependencies as per Mantis 4584.
>
> * gar_devel: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2010.04.17
>   -   to: 2010.10.21
>   + gar_devel-1.0,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 22 00:45:01 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:45:01 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsvncpp3, rapidsvn
In-Reply-To: <201010201457.o9KEvMj0019766@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010201457.o9KEvMj0019766@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikk4vmhH-aePLQCG=JhCZM2im8S1tU2m0pyrJPc@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/20/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> *Finally* an update after such a long time...
>
> * rapidsvn: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.9.6,REV=2008.04.13
>   -   to: 0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20
>   + rapidsvn-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + rapidsvn-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libsvncpp3: new package
>   + libsvncpp3-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libsvncpp3-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 22 00:46:35 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:46:35 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsvncpp3, rapidsvn
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikk4vmhH-aePLQCG=JhCZM2im8S1tU2m0pyrJPc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010201457.o9KEvMj0019766@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikk4vmhH-aePLQCG=JhCZM2im8S1tU2m0pyrJPc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikrbrehN7pu21VjFtuLWKZq5oZSpjoy+WXZjbxq@mail.gmail.com>

Side note: please tell me when files migrate FROM one package, do another.
As with the recent other package, from Maciej, I get file conflicts,
unless I process in a specific order.



On 10/21/10, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> batched
>
>
> On 10/20/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> *Finally* an update after such a long time...
>>
>> * rapidsvn: minor version upgrade
>>   - from: 0.9.6,REV=2008.04.13
>>   -   to: 0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20
>>   + rapidsvn-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>   + rapidsvn-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * libsvncpp3: new package
>>   + libsvncpp3-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>   + libsvncpp3-0.12.0.1,REV=2010.10.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Oct 22 00:48:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:48:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bind, bind_chroot, bind_devel,
	bind_u(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010211254.o9LCsP1I006127@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010211254.o9LCsP1I006127@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikRt4vq_-0ns7JxnQX3Jz=9+Dxmy_2kg=XM6WNk@mail.gmail.com>

Ah, the monthly BIND refresh.
Batched :-/



On 10/21/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * bind: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 9.7.2,REV=2010.09.14
>   -   to: 9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19
>   + bind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_chroot-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_devel-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_utils-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_utils-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libbind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libbind-9.7.2P2,REV=2010.10.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 22 17:50:34 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:50:34 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pkgutil, pkgutilplus
Message-ID: <201010221550.o9MFoYuY015456@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pkgutil: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.1,REV=2010.07.28
  -   to: 2.2,REV=2010.10.21
  + pkgutil-2.2,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pkgutil-2.2,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pkgutilplus-2.2,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 23 13:51:15 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 06:51:15 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
Message-ID: <201010231151.o9NBpFn9001868@login.bo.opencsw.org>

minor version upgrade, no pkg changes

* openldap_devel: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07
  -   to: 2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04
  + openldap_devel-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* openldap: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08
  -   to: 2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04
  + openldap-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_client-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_client-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_rt-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_rt-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Oct 24 21:43:48 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:43:48 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010231151.o9NBpFn9001868@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010231151.o9NBpFn9001868@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <D97EC644-34E0-44CD-BD20-07D56763D505@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 23.10.2010 um 13:51 schrieb THURNER Rupert:
> minor version upgrade, no pkg changes
>
> * openldap_devel: patchlevel upgrade
>  - from: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07
>  -   to: 2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04
>  + openldap_devel-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * openldap: patchlevel upgrade
>  - from: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08
>  -   to: 2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04
>  + openldap-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + openldap-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + openldap_client-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + openldap_client-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + openldap_rt-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + openldap_rt-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

Geoff David has some pending fixes for OpenLDAP, maybe we can integrate
them quickly before the release or do you need it now?


Best regards

   -- Dago


From kester at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 25 13:42:29 2010
From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_xlrd
Message-ID: <20101025114229.BF66AC77@mail.opencsw.org>

* py_xlrd: new package
  + py_xlrd-0.7.1,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From opk at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 25 14:32:30 2010
From: opk at opencsw.org (Oliver Kiddle)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:32:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nmh
Message-ID: <20101025123230.89CF8DA7@mail.opencsw.org>

I'm taking this package over from Murray Jensen. He's happy for me to
take it over and there's been a few new upstream releases since it was
last packaged.

* nmh: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.0.4
  -   to: 1.3,REV=2010.10.25
  + nmh-1.3,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + nmh-1.3,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From kester at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 25 17:13:29 2010
From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_psycopg2
Message-ID: <20101025151329.615D513C@mail.opencsw.org>

Hi,

There were no errors when doing "gmake platforms", however the
web based report shows this error:
  CSWpy-psycopg2 soname-not-found libpq.so.5 is needed by opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so 
on current9s the file /opt/csw/postgresql/lib/libpq.so.5 present.
I tried the package and it works for me.

I assume the reason for the message is that the package CSWlibpq
is not installed on the web server and the error may be ignored.

The error also only shows for the sparc pckage not for the i386.

* py_psycopg2: new package
  + py_psycopg2-2.2.2,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_psycopg2-2.2.2,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 25 17:18:35 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:18:35 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_psycopg2
In-Reply-To: <20101025151329.615D513C@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101025151329.615D513C@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <A915A777-7ADD-4450-A268-A40DD2320DC2@opencsw.org>

Hi Kester,

Am 25.10.2010 um 17:13 schrieb Kester Habermann:
> There were no errors when doing "gmake platforms", however the
> web based report shows this error:
>  CSWpy-psycopg2 soname-not-found libpq.so.5 is needed by opt/csw/lib/ 
> python/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so
> on current9s the file /opt/csw/postgresql/lib/libpq.so.5 present.
> I tried the package and it works for me.
>
> I assume the reason for the message is that the package CSWlibpq
> is not installed on the web server and the error may be ignored.

Yes, this is the cause. The migration to the fully installed
"checpkg-zone" is not ready yet...


Best regards

   -- Dago

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 25 19:25:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:25:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_xlrd
In-Reply-To: <20101025114229.BF66AC77@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101025114229.BF66AC77@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimu6JUxb6T26biQNOCiy8RDdTwX9Bkeb1S8Fwvd@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 10/25/10, Kester Habermann <kester at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * py_xlrd: new package
>   + py_xlrd-0.7.1,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 25 19:26:18 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:26:18 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nmh
In-Reply-To: <20101025123230.89CF8DA7@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101025123230.89CF8DA7@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikXpEVc+HObXhGjyeX2-E3KeTb=vUM_k16fv+VU@mail.gmail.com>

okay. batched.

On 10/25/10, Oliver Kiddle <opk at opencsw.org> wrote:
> I'm taking this package over from Murray Jensen. He's happy for me to
> take it over and there's been a few new upstream releases since it was
> last packaged.
>
> * nmh: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 1.0.4
>   -   to: 1.3,REV=2010.10.25
>   + nmh-1.3,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + nmh-1.3,REV=2010.10.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 25 19:27:38 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:27:38 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_psycopg2
In-Reply-To: <A915A777-7ADD-4450-A268-A40DD2320DC2@opencsw.org>
References: <20101025151329.615D513C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<A915A777-7ADD-4450-A268-A40DD2320DC2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ijQygnuN3JP4OGpG6yGKkPJD51aWHt14mDiTw@mail.gmail.com>

okay. this is batched.


On 10/25/10, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Kester,
>
> Am 25.10.2010 um 17:13 schrieb Kester Habermann:
>> There were no errors when doing "gmake platforms", however the
>> web based report shows this error:
>>  CSWpy-psycopg2 soname-not-found libpq.so.5 is needed by opt/csw/lib/
>> python/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so
>> on current9s the file /opt/csw/postgresql/lib/libpq.so.5 present.
>> I tried the package and it works for me.
>>
>> I assume the reason for the message is that the package CSWlibpq
>> is not installed on the web server and the error may be ignored.
>
> Yes, this is the cause. The migration to the fully installed
> "checpkg-zone" is not ready yet...
>
>
> Best regards
>
>    -- Dago
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Oct 25 19:24:59 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:24:59 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pkgutil, pkgutilplus
In-Reply-To: <201010221550.o9MFoYuY015456@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010221550.o9MFoYuY015456@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikWdwKmuA5LFrppSEUEeSPiB_3vFFOZoj6Wv-5R@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 10/22/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pkgutil: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 2.1,REV=2010.07.28
>   -   to: 2.2,REV=2010.10.21
>   + pkgutil-2.2,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pkgutil-2.2,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pkgutilplus-2.2,REV=2010.10.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From gadavis at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 25 21:29:09 2010
From: gadavis at opencsw.org (Geoff Davis)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:29:09 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <D97EC644-34E0-44CD-BD20-07D56763D505@opencsw.org>
References: <201010231151.o9NBpFn9001868@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<D97EC644-34E0-44CD-BD20-07D56763D505@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <D5298651-6A05-46A9-AA8D-15F9D9478609@opencsw.org>

I submitted a couple of changes to the GAR SVN in r11353 and r11354 that should fix most of the issues with the startup of cswopenldap. I tried doing a build after that but there were a number of checkpkg warnings that look like they are due to the tests for the shared object policies.

On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:

> Hi Rupert,
> 
> Am 23.10.2010 um 13:51 schrieb THURNER Rupert:
>> minor version upgrade, no pkg changes
>> 
>> * openldap_devel: patchlevel upgrade
>> - from: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07
>> -   to: 2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04
>> + openldap_devel-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> * openldap: patchlevel upgrade
>> - from: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08
>> -   to: 2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04
>> + openldap-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> + openldap-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> + openldap_client-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> + openldap_client-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> + openldap_rt-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> + openldap_rt-2.4.23,REV=2010.10.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> Geoff David has some pending fixes for OpenLDAP, maybe we can integrate
> them quickly before the release or do you need it now?
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  -- Dago
> 


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 26 03:32:40 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:32:40 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gtar
Message-ID: <201010260132.o9Q1WeXr006629@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Version bump.

-Ben

* gtar: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.23,REV=2010.07.09
  -   to: 1.24,REV=2010.10.26
  + gtar-1.24,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gtar-1.24,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 26 06:16:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:16:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <D5298651-6A05-46A9-AA8D-15F9D9478609@opencsw.org>
References: <201010231151.o9NBpFn9001868@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<D97EC644-34E0-44CD-BD20-07D56763D505@opencsw.org>
	<D5298651-6A05-46A9-AA8D-15F9D9478609@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim46+-U9GEVZ1NDvcdh7V2bqTCexYKw8UXcWiLY@mail.gmail.com>

so.... where do we stand on this?

From kester at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 26 11:25:19 2010
From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_ldap
Message-ID: <20101026092519.96B09793@mail.opencsw.org>

The current maintainer of this package is listed as 'retired'
so I took the liberty of upgrading to the latest version.

I could not find a GAR package for this (maybe it was built
manually), so I built a package from scratch using GAR.

This should also fix this issue:
  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=2474

* py_ldap: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.3.4
  -   to: 2.3.12,REV=2010.10.26
  + py_ldap-2.3.12,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_ldap-2.3.12,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 26 19:01:20 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:01:20 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_django
Message-ID: <201010261701.o9QH1KKJ004500@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* py_django: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.1.1,REV=2009.12.16
  -   to: 1.2.3,REV=2010.10.26
  + py_django-1.2.3,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 26 21:19:36 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:19:36 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gtar
In-Reply-To: <201010260132.o9Q1WeXr006629@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010260132.o9Q1WeXr006629@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAURbG3j6u-5w+GHxMBTjzci48Z5wXBeZpdD5r@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 10/25/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Version bump.
>
> -Ben
>
> * gtar: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 1.23,REV=2010.07.09
>   -   to: 1.24,REV=2010.10.26
>   + gtar-1.24,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + gtar-1.24,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 26 21:27:00 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_ldap
In-Reply-To: <20101026092519.96B09793@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <20101026092519.96B09793@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi==b39BgzAJXHyPQ1xGf0OepDMPuKd38WtVDu2v@mail.gmail.com>

excellent.
batched.

oh wait.

PKG namechange.
Please tell me about that sort of thing in the future.

Since it has zero dependancies, I'll let it go through.
But please make (separate!) announcements to user and announce mailing lists.



On 10/26/10, Kester Habermann <kester at opencsw.org> wrote:
> The current maintainer of this package is listed as 'retired'
> so I took the liberty of upgrading to the latest version.
>
> I could not find a GAR package for this (maybe it was built
> manually), so I built a package from scratch using GAR.
>
> This should also fix this issue:
>   https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=2474
>
> * py_ldap: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 2.3.4
>   -   to: 2.3.12,REV=2010.10.26
>   + py_ldap-2.3.12,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + py_ldap-2.3.12,REV=2010.10.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Oct 26 21:30:47 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:30:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions]  newpkgs apr_util ?
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=zzfwoOVChqXsACqQtFK++_twXtYHdOhfs1hbj@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rupert,

I see a newer apr_util in newpkgs from 2010.10.23, but I dont see an
email about it?

From rupert at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 27 20:51:19 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:51:19 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util
Message-ID: <201010271851.o9RIpJ66024266@login.bo.opencsw.org>

upgrade to 1.3.10

* apr_util: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.3.9,REV=2010.09.03
  -   to: 1.3.10,REV=2010.10.23
  + apr_util-1.3.10,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apr_util-1.3.10,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From kester at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 28 17:24:14 2010
From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:24:14 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_django_auth_ldap,
	py_django_filter(...)
Message-ID: <20101028152414.D4D7B507@mail.opencsw.org>

packages to be used in conjunction with Django.

* py_django_sorting: new package
  + py_django_sorting-0.1,REV=2010.10.28-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* py_django_filter: new package
  + py_django_filter-0.5.3,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* py_django_auth_ldap: new package
  + py_django_auth_ldap-1.0.6,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Oct 28 18:04:56 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:04:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util
In-Reply-To: <201010271851.o9RIpJ66024266@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010271851.o9RIpJ66024266@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=xwco8_OrzWLr7gN63UJK7ZzVqmMx9NG1J1LNC@mail.gmail.com>

okay, batched.



On 10/27/10, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> upgrade to 1.3.10
>
> * apr_util: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 1.3.9,REV=2010.09.03
>   -   to: 1.3.10,REV=2010.10.23
>   + apr_util-1.3.10,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + apr_util-1.3.10,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From jcraig at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 28 21:22:51 2010
From: jcraig at opencsw.org (Jonathan Craig)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:22:51 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netsyslog
Message-ID: <201010281922.o9SJMpJt015025@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_netsyslog: new package
  + pm_netsyslog-0.04,REV=2010.10.28-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Oct 28 23:45:10 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:45:10 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netsyslog
In-Reply-To: <201010281922.o9SJMpJt015025@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010281922.o9SJMpJt015025@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=_9b_cjgkLgdmjEbuV5DxjVi3Ao9Rg60yfy4aK@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 10/28/10, Jonathan Craig <jcraig at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_netsyslog: new package
>   + pm_netsyslog-0.04,REV=2010.10.28-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Oct 31 01:07:14 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:07:14 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_subversion, javasvn,
	pm_subversio(...)
Message-ID: <201010302307.o9UN7Ec0028697@login.bo.opencsw.org>

patch level version upgrade

* various packages: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.6.12,REV=2010.09.23
  -   to: 1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23
  + ap2_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + javasvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pythonsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rbsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* various packages: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.6.12,REV=2010.09.23
  -   to: 1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27
  + ap2_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + javasvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pythonsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rbsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + subversion_contrib-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + subversion_devel-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + subversion_tools-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Oct 31 07:46:51 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 01:46:51 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sudo_ldap
Message-ID: <201010310646.o9V6kp3s011220@login.bo.opencsw.org>

patch level upgrade, recompile to use openldap-2.4 instead of openldap-2.3

* sudo_ldap: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.7.2p5,REV=2010.03.02
  -   to: 1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31
  + sudo_ldap-1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sudo_ldap-1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Oct 31 08:25:07 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:25:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim46+-U9GEVZ1NDvcdh7V2bqTCexYKw8UXcWiLY@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010231151.o9NBpFn9001868@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<D97EC644-34E0-44CD-BD20-07D56763D505@opencsw.org>
	<D5298651-6A05-46A9-AA8D-15F9D9478609@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim46+-U9GEVZ1NDvcdh7V2bqTCexYKw8UXcWiLY@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinkGFQMvsKBOjpUiFT1FB8hBn_5jzZ==ZKOE_Ow@mail.gmail.com>

tried to build it again with the changes and this time got:

gmake GAR_PLATFORM=solaris9-i386 MODULATION=isa-i386-features-minimal
 ISA=i386  FEATURES=minimal  merge-modulated
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibldap2-4-2 = libldap2_4_2
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap-2.4.so.2.5.6
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap-2.4.so.2\.[0-9\.]+
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibldap2-4-2 += OpenLDAP runtime libraries, libldap-2.4.so.2
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWoldaprt += CSWlibldap2-4-2
PACKAGES += CSWlibldap-r2-3-0
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 = libldap_r2_3_0
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.3.so.0.2.31
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.3.so.0\.[0-9\.]+
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 += OpenLDAP runtime libraries, libldap_r-2.3.so.0
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWoldaprt += CSWlibldap-r2-3-0
PACKAGES += CSWlibldap-r2-4-2
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 = libldap_r2_4_2
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.5.6
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.4.so.2\.[0-9\.]+
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 += OpenLDAP runtime libraries, libldap_r-2.4.so.2
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWoldaprt += CSWlibldap-r2-4-2
Applying the overrides and analyzing the results.
If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them
pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldapdevel +=
archall-with-arch-paths|/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/liblber.so
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldapdevel +=
archall-with-arch-paths|/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldapdevel +=
archall-with-arch-paths|/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r.so
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldaprt +=
non-uniform-lib-versions-in-package|sonames=['liblber-2.3.so.0',|'liblber-2.4.so.2',|'libldap-2.3.so.0',|'libldap-2.4.so.2',|'libldap_r-2.3.so.0',|'libldap_r-2.4.so.2']


what should we do in this case?


rupert.

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 06:16, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> so.... where do we stand on this?
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Oct 31 21:41:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:41:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sudo_ldap
In-Reply-To: <201010310646.o9V6kp3s011220@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010310646.o9V6kp3s011220@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Byy0H+WphLa-OFxzbn-KB7RwkKu715RuMi12B@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Saturday, October 30, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> patch level upgrade, recompile to use openldap-2.4 instead of openldap-2.3
>
> * sudo_ldap: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 1.7.2p5,REV=2010.03.02
>  ?- ? to: 1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31
>  ?+ sudo_ldap-1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ sudo_ldap-1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Oct 31 21:41:21 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:41:21 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_subversion, javasvn,
	pm_subversio(...)
In-Reply-To: <201010302307.o9UN7Ec0028697@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201010302307.o9UN7Ec0028697@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimsqVgk=CEhGpto0ZN=3xErcF-ZWwHQzYOfxUoS@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Saturday, October 30, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> patch level version upgrade
>
> * various packages: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 1.6.12,REV=2010.09.23
>  ?- ? to: 1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23
>  ?+ ap2_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ javasvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ pm_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ pythonsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ rbsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * various packages: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 1.6.12,REV=2010.09.23
>  ?- ? to: 1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27
>  ?+ ap2_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ javasvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ pm_subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ pythonsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ rbsvn-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ subversion-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ subversion_contrib-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ subversion_devel-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ subversion_tools-1.6.13,REV=2010.10.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Oct 31 22:06:33 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:06:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sudo_ldap
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Byy0H+WphLa-OFxzbn-KB7RwkKu715RuMi12B@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201010310646.o9V6kp3s011220@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=Byy0H+WphLa-OFxzbn-KB7RwkKu715RuMi12B@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A5575ACC-0BBC-4AF2-9C68-CE77F10FBD87@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 31.10.2010 um 21:41 schrieb Philip Brown:
> batched

I vaguely remember you said there were some issues you had with more recent
versions. Can you remember which they were so we can check that the current
version does not have them?


Best regards

  -- Dago

> On Saturday, October 30, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> patch level upgrade, recompile to use openldap-2.4 instead of openldap-2.3
>> 
>> * sudo_ldap: patchlevel upgrade
>>  - from: 1.7.2p5,REV=2010.03.02
>>  -   to: 1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31
>>  + sudo_ldap-1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + sudo_ldap-1.7.4p4,REV=2010.10.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions