[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client, openldap_d(...)

[rupert THURNER]

tried to build it again with the changes and this time got:

gmake GAR_PLATFORM=solaris9-i386 MODULATION=isa-i386-features-minimal
 ISA=i386  FEATURES=minimal  merge-modulated
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibldap2-4-2 = libldap2_4_2
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap-2.4.so.2.5.6
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap-2.4.so.2\.[0-9\.]+
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibldap2-4-2 += OpenLDAP runtime libraries, libldap-2.4.so.2
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWoldaprt += CSWlibldap2-4-2
PACKAGES += CSWlibldap-r2-3-0
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 = libldap_r2_3_0
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.3.so.0.2.31
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.3.so.0\.[0-9\.]+
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibldap-r2-3-0 += OpenLDAP runtime libraries, libldap_r-2.3.so.0
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWoldaprt += CSWlibldap-r2-3-0
PACKAGES += CSWlibldap-r2-4-2
CATALOGNAME_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 = libldap_r2_4_2
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.5.6
PKGFILES_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 += /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r-2.4.so.2\.[0-9\.]+
SPKG_DESC_CSWlibldap-r2-4-2 += OpenLDAP runtime libraries, libldap_r-2.4.so.2
RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWoldaprt += CSWlibldap-r2-4-2
Applying the overrides and analyzing the results.
If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them
pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldapdevel +=
archall-with-arch-paths|/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/liblber.so
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldapdevel +=
archall-with-arch-paths|/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldapdevel +=
archall-with-arch-paths|/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap_r.so
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWoldaprt +=
non-uniform-lib-versions-in-package|sonames=['liblber-2.3.so.0',|'liblber-2.4.so.2',|'libldap-2.3.so.0',|'libldap-2.4.so.2',|'libldap_r-2.3.so.0',|'libldap_r-2.4.so.2']


what should we do in this case?


rupert.

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 06:16, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> so.... where do we stand on this?
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>