From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Feb  1 17:55:22 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:55:22 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gdbm, libgdbm3, libgdbm_dev
Message-ID: <201102011655.p11GtMgl027778@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This fixes #4681: Missing dependencs from gdbm to libgdbm3

* gdbm: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.01.27
  -   to: 2011.02.01
  + gdbm-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgdbm3-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgdbm3-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgdbm_dev-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgdbm_dev-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb  1 18:48:49 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:48:49 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gdbm, libgdbm3, libgdbm_dev
In-Reply-To: <201102011655.p11GtMgl027778@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102011655.p11GtMgl027778@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimvuZi4nw-xL+y2h4XEPH7zbNF4ZLiV1zvhBoBw@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 2/1/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This fixes #4681: Missing dependencs from gdbm to libgdbm3
>
> * gdbm: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2011.01.27
>   -   to: 2011.02.01
>   + gdbm-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libgdbm3-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libgdbm3-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libgdbm_dev-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libgdbm_dev-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From gadavis at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  2 00:29:35 2011
From: gadavis at opencsw.org (Geoff Davis)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:29:35 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gmt, gmt_doc, gmtcoast_full,
	gmtcoast(...)
Message-ID: <201102012329.p11NTZmb009281@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Packages for the Generic Mapping Tools, including data files.

Note that the /usr/local reference in gmt_doc is perfectly valid. Refers to a
command that works like "alternatives" and allows the user to switch between
multiple versions of GMT installed on the system, including any that they may
have compiled by hand and placed in /usr/local.

* gmtcoast: new package
  + gmtcoast_full-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gmtcoast_high-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gmtcoast_low-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* gmt: new package
  + gmt-4.5.5,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gmt-4.5.5,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gmt_doc-4.5.5,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  2 08:36:25 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:36:25 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_atomixlib
Message-ID: <201102020736.p127aPVC011803@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Atom module for Python.

* py_atomixlib: new package
  + py_atomixlib-0.6.1a,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  2 12:34:13 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:34:13 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill, libldns1, libldns_devel,
	l(...)
Message-ID: <201102021134.p12BYDg0024335@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libldns: new package
  + libldns1-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libldns1-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libldns_devel-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libldns_devel-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* ldnsdrill: new package
  + ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* unbound: new package
  + libunbound2-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libunbound2-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_devel-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_devel-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_host-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_host-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* unbound: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.1,REV=2009.12.27
  -   to: 1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02
  + unbound-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  2 19:43:00 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:43:00 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gmt, gmt_doc, gmtcoast_full,
	gmtcoast(...)
In-Reply-To: <201102012329.p11NTZmb009281@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102012329.p11NTZmb009281@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinKzG8NoDd=XU_KLLq7D=r0BAsreYF1QeGDBS=u@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the note.
batched.


On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Geoff Davis <gadavis at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Packages for the Generic Mapping Tools, including data files.
>
> Note that the /usr/local reference in gmt_doc is perfectly valid. Refers to a
> command that works like "alternatives" and allows the user to switch between
> multiple versions of GMT installed on the system, including any that they may
> have compiled by hand and placed in /usr/local.
>
> * gmtcoast: new package
> ?+ gmtcoast_full-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gmtcoast_high-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gmtcoast_low-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * gmt: new package
> ?+ gmt-4.5.5,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gmt-4.5.5,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gmt_doc-4.5.5,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Feb  2 19:46:38 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:46:38 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_atomixlib
In-Reply-To: <201102020736.p127aPVC011803@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102020736.p127aPVC011803@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinw1=9VtBp4cr1d9TZWbkiEgfgVmgno5+T=KkA-@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Atom module for Python.
>
> * py_atomixlib: new package
> ?+ py_atomixlib-0.6.1a,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  2 19:56:15 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:56:15 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill, libldns1, libldns_devel,
	l(...)
In-Reply-To: <201102021134.p12BYDg0024335@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102021134.p12BYDg0024335@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimPwX8e_UBy9a8JcL53qo740ChTX0aDF4ubeRvu@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for patiently discussing through the issues with me.

packages now batched.
Assorted renames done.
(drill -> ldnsdrill,   ldns ->libldns1, ldns_devel -> libldns_devel)
(lot of work, yuck)



On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libldns: new package
> ?+ libldns1-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libldns1-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libldns_devel-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libldns_devel-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * ldnsdrill: new package
> ?+ ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * unbound: new package
> ?+ libunbound2-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libunbound2-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ unbound_devel-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ unbound_devel-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ unbound_host-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ unbound_host-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * unbound: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.4.1,REV=2009.12.27
> ?- ? to: 1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02
> ?+ unbound-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ unbound-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> -

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 09:04:54 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:04:54 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawzlib
Message-ID: <201102030804.p1384sCx003803@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Fixes bug #4683.

* pm_compressrawzlib: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.01.06
  -   to: 2011.02.02
  + pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 17:38:43 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:38:43 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tardy
Message-ID: <201102031638.p13GchDa003826@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* tardy: new package
  + tardy-1.20,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tardy-1.20,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 17:39:02 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:39:02 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpytalloc_util2, libtalloc2,
	libtal(...)
Message-ID: <201102031639.p13Gd2xX003851@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* talloc: new package
  + libpytalloc_util2-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpytalloc_util2-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtalloc2-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtalloc2-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtalloc_dev-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtalloc_dev-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_talloc-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_talloc-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_talloc_dev-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_talloc_dev-2.0.5,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 17:40:31 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:40:31 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcre0, libpcrecpp0, libpcreposix0,
	(...)
Message-ID: <201102031640.p13GeVOL007400@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pcre: minor version upgrade
  - from: 8.11,REV=2011.01.05
  -   to: 8.12,REV=2011.01.18
  + libpcre0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcre0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcrecpp0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcrecpp0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcreposix0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcreposix0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre_devel-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre_devel-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre_rt-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 17:42:28 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:42:28 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
Message-ID: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Takeover from sabbatical Chad Harp

* rdesktop: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.02.22
  -   to: 2011.01.17
  + rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 17:41:52 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:41:52 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxerces_c3_1, libxerces_c_devel,
	xe(...)
Message-ID: <201102031641.p13GfqjT016830@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Takeover from retired Andreas Almroth

* xerces_c: major version upgrade
  - from: 2.5.0,REV=2004.09.12
  -   to: 3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17
  + xerces_c-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xerces_c-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libxerces_c: new package
  + libxerces_c3_1-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxerces_c3_1-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxerces_c_devel-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxerces_c_devel-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 17:57:21 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:57:21 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxerces_c3_1, libxerces_c_devel,
	xe(...)
In-Reply-To: <201102031641.p13GfqjT016830@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102031641.p13GfqjT016830@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <A0F6D655-85D5-4B41-B519-E71381427BAA@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

this lay around for some time, please DO NOT release, I'll fix up
_devel to the new _dev standard.

Best regards

  -- Dago

Am 03.02.2011 um 17:41 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Takeover from retired Andreas Almroth
> 
> * xerces_c: major version upgrade
>  - from: 2.5.0,REV=2004.09.12
>  -   to: 3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17
>  + xerces_c-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + xerces_c-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> * libxerces_c: new package
>  + libxerces_c3_1-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libxerces_c3_1-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libxerces_c_devel-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libxerces_c_devel-3.1.1,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 18:32:15 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:32:15 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxerces_c3_1, libxerces_c_dev,
	xerces_c
Message-ID: <201102031732.p13HWFHi025565@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Once again :-)

* xerces_c: major version upgrade
  - from: 2.5.0,REV=2004.09.12
  -   to: 3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03
  + xerces_c-3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xerces_c-3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libxerces_c: new package
  + libxerces_c3_1-3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxerces_c3_1-3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxerces_c_dev-3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxerces_c_dev-3.1.1,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 19:10:38 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:10:38 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
Message-ID: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Takeover from Damjan Perenic. References to /usr/local in sample files.

* dialog: major version upgrade
  - from: 0.9b_20030130,REV=2003.03.18
  -   to: 1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.03
  + dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb  3 20:22:10 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:22:10 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxerces_c3_1, libxerces_c_devel,
	xe(...)
In-Reply-To: <A0F6D655-85D5-4B41-B519-E71381427BAA@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031641.p13GfqjT016830@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<A0F6D655-85D5-4B41-B519-E71381427BAA@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=QUzz+cTD8xba_JrJchMBqrV6AWyUQ6iNXjReC@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/3/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> this lay around for some time, please DO NOT release, I'll fix up
> _devel to the new _dev standard.
>

Soo.. remind me when this "new _dev standard" came about?

I think the standard is _devel, not dev.

we have 4, count em, 4, packages with _dev.
but 126 with _devel.

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb  3 22:22:23 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:22:23 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawzlib
In-Reply-To: <201102030804.p1384sCx003803@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102030804.p1384sCx003803@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=heqS13+4h9LHqMEWO+nXJbGi0H8E0T80N9KKb@mail.gmail.com>

Hmm.
interestingly, an ldd on
/root/opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.so

does not show a dependency on libz.so

is the dep on CSWzlib an error?


On 2/3/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Fixes bug #4683.
>
> * pm_compressrawzlib: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2011.01.06
>   -   to: 2011.02.02
>   + pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb  3 22:23:20 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:23:20 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tardy
In-Reply-To: <201102031638.p13GchDa003826@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102031638.p13GchDa003826@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=0d+A3ERHn0rtdDqgO1qZJic-M9hGCheaX_qo7@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 2/3/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * tardy: new package
>   + tardy-1.20,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + tardy-1.20,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb  3 22:27:45 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:27:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>

Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?


On 2/3/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Takeover from sabbatical Chad Harp
>
> * rdesktop: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2009.02.22
>   -   to: 2011.01.17
>   + rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb  3 22:26:10 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:26:10 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcre0, libpcrecpp0,
 libpcreposix0, (...)
In-Reply-To: <201102031640.p13GeVOL007400@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102031640.p13GeVOL007400@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=7xd=rQ1HBjdUWXwed-D8WZFwkziVyYfLDN6f2@mail.gmail.com>

ok. batched.

On 2/3/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pcre: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 8.11,REV=2011.01.05
>   -   to: 8.12,REV=2011.01.18
>   + libpcre0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libpcre0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libpcrecpp0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libpcrecpp0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libpcreposix0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libpcreposix0-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pcre-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pcre-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pcre_devel-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pcre_devel-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + pcre_rt-8.12,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb  3 22:32:08 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:32:08 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/3/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Takeover from Damjan Perenic. References to /usr/local in sample files.
>

Thanks for the heads up.

I do note that the dependancies changed, though: you have added CSWncurses.
Prior package depended on nothing but cswcommon.

Is there a compelling reason to chain in ncurses and csw termcap for this?

(and even if there is, you might consider using "alternatives" to
provide an ncurses, and a native curses version of the package)

>From my recollection, the only issue of interest, was color handling.
For people doing lightweight stuff, a native-only, b&w only version,
would potentially be valuable.

> * dialog: major version upgrade
>   - from: 0.9b_20030130,REV=2003.03.18
>   -   to: 1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.03
>   + dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 22:44:30 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:44:30 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?

This fixes #4664:
  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664

Best regards

  -- Dago

> On 2/3/11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Takeover from sabbatical Chad Harp
>> 
>> * rdesktop: revision upgrade
>>  - from: 2009.02.22
>>  -   to: 2011.01.17
>>  + rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 23:02:58 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:02:58 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawzlib
Message-ID: <201102032202.p13M2wQw011973@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Removed zlib dependency.

* pm_compressrawzlib: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.01.06
  -   to: 2011.02.03
  + pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 23:06:57 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:06:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawzlib
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=heqS13+4h9LHqMEWO+nXJbGi0H8E0T80N9KKb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102030804.p1384sCx003803@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=heqS13+4h9LHqMEWO+nXJbGi0H8E0T80N9KKb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1bH84U4anYUzJ0ee=gFWznzqB7FAy0HBizaf5@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> Hmm.
> interestingly, an ldd on
> /root/opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.so
>
> does not show a dependency on libz.so
>
> is the dep on CSWzlib an error?

I guess so, it has been there for a while but it doesn't seem
necessary. I have resubmitted packages without it.

/peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb  3 23:16:43 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:16:43 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> I do note that the dependancies changed, though: you have added CSWncurses.
> Prior package depended on nothing but cswcommon.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to chain in ncurses and csw termcap for this?
>
> (and even if there is, you might consider using "alternatives" to
> provide an ncurses, and a native curses version of the package)
>
> From my recollection, the only issue of interest, was color handling.
> For people doing lightweight stuff, a native-only, b&w only version,
> would potentially be valuable.

Yes, it's about color support, it works nicely with ncurses but not
with curses even when setting environment variables. Ncurses is a
common package anyway but even if not already installed it and
terminfo is only 1.5 MB total.

By the way, this also fixes bug #3908.

/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb  4 02:09:48 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:09:48 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?
>
> This fixes #4664:
> ?https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664
>

aha.

shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb  4 05:58:26 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:58:26 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>..
>> Is there a compelling reason to chain in ncurses and csw termcap for this?
>>
>> (and even if there is, you might consider using "alternatives" to
>> provide an ncurses, and a native curses version of the package)
>>
>> From my recollection, the only issue of interest, was color handling.
>> For people doing lightweight stuff, a native-only, b&w only version,
>> would potentially be valuable.
>
> Yes, it's about color support, it works nicely with ncurses but not
> with curses even when setting environment variables. Ncurses is a
> common package anyway but even if not already installed it and
> terminfo is only 1.5 MB total.
>

If this were a different type of package, I would be more inclined to
say "okay, sure". The trouble here, is that "dialog" is the type of
package that specifically appeals to people who are low-impact, as it
were. If you are using 'dialog', you are using very lightweight
text-only packages, instead of the usual GUI hugeness, which may take
hundreds of megabytes.
It is concievable that they even may want this ONE package, just for itself.
Please note that the dialog package itself, is a mere 170k.
As such, even the ncurses package alone, weighing in at 1300k, is considerable.
Piling on another 1500k for the ncurses-pulled terminfo package, puts
things way over the top.

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb  4 05:59:08 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:59:08 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_compressrawzlib
In-Reply-To: <201102032202.p13M2wQw011973@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102032202.p13M2wQw011973@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-34LkhbnEvAzw-T55K7j7enbFJV9=2fvBQg6f@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks. batched.


On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Removed zlib dependency.
>
> * pm_compressrawzlib: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2011.01.06
> ?- ? to: 2011.02.03
> ?+ pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_compressrawzlib-2.032,REV=2011.02.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 09:13:27 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:13:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikJBVyjx6zJCC6kTMnqotpzKHNbqzYaYp+w5M6D@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> If this were a different type of package, I would be more inclined to
> say "okay, sure". The trouble here, is that "dialog" is the type of
> package that specifically appeals to people who are low-impact, as it
> were. If you are using 'dialog', you are using very lightweight
> text-only packages, instead of the usual GUI hugeness, which may take
> hundreds of megabytes.
> It is concievable that they even may want this ONE package, just for itself.
> Please note that the dialog package itself, is a mere 170k.
> As such, even the ncurses package alone, weighing in at 1300k, is considerable.
> Piling on another 1500k for the ncurses-pulled terminfo package, puts
> things way over the top.

It's not that I don't welcome your suggestions and personal views but
this is what I want to release.

/peter

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 09:25:03 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:25:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:09:48 -0800")
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x662t0qk9s.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?
>>
>> This fixes #4664:
>> ?https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664
>>
>
> aha.
>
> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?

The change in the REV stanza is not enough?
-- 
Peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 09:58:48 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:58:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <37B0B8B8-F9CC-458B-B015-94F5D6621A6F@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 04.02.2011 um 02:09 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?
>> 
>> This fixes #4664:
>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664
> 
> aha.
> 
> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?

We have a lot of packages that have contributed patches not applied
to upstream and we usually keep the original version. However, it would
be good to have a standard location where this is described for a package.
Like a file in doc/ written in ascii markup which is also put on the
webpage for the package on release.


Best regards

  -- Dago



From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 10:16:24 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:16:24 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <37B0B8B8-F9CC-458B-B015-94F5D6621A6F@opencsw.org> (Dagobert
	Michelsen's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:58:48 +0100")
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<37B0B8B8-F9CC-458B-B015-94F5D6621A6F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x6wrlgp3br.fsf@opencsw.org>

Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:

> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 04.02.2011 um 02:09 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>> 
>>> Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?
>>> 
>>> This fixes #4664:
>>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664
>> 
>> aha.
>> 
>> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?
>
> We have a lot of packages that have contributed patches not applied
> to upstream and we usually keep the original version. However, it would
> be good to have a standard location where this is described for a package.
> Like a file in doc/ written in ascii markup which is also put on the
> webpage for the package on release.

There is the README.CSW which I use when there is specific information
related to packaging, our patches being of that class.
-- 
Peter

From skayser at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 10:11:55 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:11:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>

* Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> >..
> >> Is there a compelling reason to chain in ncurses and csw termcap for this?
> >>
> >> (and even if there is, you might consider using "alternatives" to
> >> provide an ncurses, and a native curses version of the package)
> >>
> >> From my recollection, the only issue of interest, was color handling.
> >> For people doing lightweight stuff, a native-only, b&w only version,
> >> would potentially be valuable.
> >
> > Yes, it's about color support, it works nicely with ncurses but not
> > with curses even when setting environment variables. Ncurses is a
> > common package anyway but even if not already installed it and
> > terminfo is only 1.5 MB total.
> >
> 
> If this were a different type of package, I would be more inclined to
> say "okay, sure". The trouble here, is that "dialog" is the type of
> package that specifically appeals to people who are low-impact, as it
> were. If you are using 'dialog', you are using very lightweight
> text-only packages, instead of the usual GUI hugeness, which may take
> hundreds of megabytes.
> It is concievable that they even may want this ONE package, just for itself.
> Please note that the dialog package itself, is a mere 170k.
> As such, even the ncurses package alone, weighing in at 1300k, is considerable.
> Piling on another 1500k for the ncurses-pulled terminfo package, puts
> things way over the top.

We don't know - but simply assume - that people actually care whether
dialog comes with additional dependencies. OTOH, what we do know for
sure is that support for different terminals is definitly more robust
and less likely to break when apps are linked to our CSWncurses (because
this implies TERMINFO=/opt/csw/share/terminfo).

So why the heck do we go in circles around this topic every time it pops
up?

Sebastian

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 10:33:14 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:33:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <x6wrlgp3br.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<37B0B8B8-F9CC-458B-B015-94F5D6621A6F@opencsw.org>
	<x6wrlgp3br.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinhVZhyGgsgG-M_k6w6Xydo2=6VffXKS76VBCJO@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> There is the README.CSW which I use when there is specific information
> related to packaging, our patches being of that class.

That's good enough to me.

For packages built by GAR the new package browser on our web site also
links to the build description so it's easy to find the actual patch
used.

/peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 13:22:20 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:22:20 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
Message-ID: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Next try

* msmtp: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.22,REV=2011.01.04
  -   to: 1.4.23,REV=2011.02.04
  + msmtp-1.4.23,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + msmtp-1.4.23,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 15:26:29 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:26:29 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libyaz4, libyaz_devel, yaz
Message-ID: <201102041426.p14EQTqn019579@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Now without bad strings in it.

* yaz: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.0.9,REV=2010.06.09
  -   to: 4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04
  + yaz-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + yaz-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libyaz: new package
  + libyaz4-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libyaz4-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libyaz_devel-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libyaz_devel-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb  4 18:49:24 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:49:24 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikJBVyjx6zJCC6kTMnqotpzKHNbqzYaYp+w5M6D@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikJBVyjx6zJCC6kTMnqotpzKHNbqzYaYp+w5M6D@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimjmTGSnBmJPPX0HT3NS6jQDG25ms-DHupmrkj3@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Please note that the dialog package itself, is a mere 170k.
>> As such, even the ncurses package alone, weighing in at 1300k, is considerable.
>> Piling on another 1500k for the ncurses-pulled terminfo package, puts
>> things way over the top.
>
> It's not that I don't welcome your suggestions and personal views but
> this is what I want to release.

Okay. As "release manager", I respect that you do not wish to maintain
two packages rather than one. The package is
"virtually" accepted, on principle.

I havent pushed it just yet, because it would be silly to release it
now, and then re-release depending on the answer to the following
question.

Speaking as "just another maintainer", would you please be willing to
make a very minor mod to your package, and make /opt/csw/bin/dialog be
under alternatives? I plan to make a native-curses package of dialog,
and it would be cleaner to have integration that way.

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 18:59:07 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:59:07 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> ...
> We don't know - but simply assume - that people actually care whether
> dialog comes with additional dependencies. OTOH, what we do know for
> sure is that support for different terminals is definitly more robust
> and less likely to break when apps are linked to our CSWncurses (because
> this implies TERMINFO=/opt/csw/share/terminfo).
>
> So why the heck do we go in circles around this topic every time it pops
> up?

Well, we do know for a fact that some of our "customers" do care about
size of packages, and needless downloads.
The question then becomes whether or not it is "needless".

It seems clear that for those customers that dont care about color, it
is needless.
What other examples of "breakage" do you know of?

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 19:46:49 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:46:49 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimjmTGSnBmJPPX0HT3NS6jQDG25ms-DHupmrkj3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikJBVyjx6zJCC6kTMnqotpzKHNbqzYaYp+w5M6D@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimjmTGSnBmJPPX0HT3NS6jQDG25ms-DHupmrkj3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1296844961-sup-1619@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Feb 04 12:49:24 -0500 2011:

Hi Phil,

> Speaking as "just another maintainer", would you please be willing
> to make a very minor mod to your package, and make
> /opt/csw/bin/dialog be under alternatives? I plan to make a
> native-curses package of dialog, and it would be cleaner to have
> integration that way.

This is a generous offer and I think Peter would make this change.

This could very simply be handled with GAR modulations though so that
both packages can be built at every update from the same source, at
the same time.  I'm willing to lend support to this effort if Peter
would accept it?

The benefit to doing it like this is that we get to keep the build
recipe all in one place.

[Note: I have no personal interest in either version of this package,
I just want to keep the build descriptions as clean and coherent as
possible.]

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb  4 20:11:25 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:11:25 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <x662t0qk9s.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<x662t0qk9s.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=oo7FapfFAMNDMQ10=U=5GcGwk65M0J05noUCK@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?
>
> The change in the REV stanza is not enough?

well, making it REV=2001.01.17.patched  or something would be fine too.
I think its important to let our users know, "this is not just
rdesktop 1.6.0 source".

Naming it rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17 as it currently stands,
implies that it is just pure 1.6.0
Mentioning it in the README is nice, but I think we need to be more
accurate in the naming.
It is after all, "version naming". We are misrepresenting "this is
rdesktop version 1.6.0".

It would be nice to have some kind of opencsw standard, "this is
patched" naming addon.
(for feature patch, not just "make it compile on solaris/relocate to /opt/csw")

This is one reason I hate the openssh people:
The nice simple standard for us, would be

software-#.#.#p, p=="patched".

but the idiots at openssh have decided 5.4p1 is their normal naming
style, instead of "5.4.1" like everyone else uses. Grrr.

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb  4 20:15:11 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:15:11 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Next try
>
> * msmtp: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.4.22,REV=2011.01.04
> ?- ? to: 1.4.23,REV=2011.02.04
> ?+ msmtp-1.4.23,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ msmtp-1.4.23,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>

I just noticed you have
/etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-system.example
/etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-user.example
(no class usage at all)

How about moving them to /opt/csw/share/doc/msmtp ?

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 20:20:07 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:20:07 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=oo7FapfFAMNDMQ10=U=5GcGwk65M0J05noUCK@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<x662t0qk9s.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=oo7FapfFAMNDMQ10=U=5GcGwk65M0J05noUCK@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinF-SwmUVSwsaEVLA03YbiYk4vZ9Q7-5CZCa-5K@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/4 Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?
>>
>> The change in the REV stanza is not enough?
>
> well, making it REV=2001.01.17.patched ?or something would be fine too.
> I think its important to let our users know, "this is not just
> rdesktop 1.6.0 source".

We rarely ship software built from unpatched sources.  What you're
talking about here, is an issue which can potentially affect a very
large portion of the catalog.  I have two questions:

- Why has it become an issue all of a sudden?
- Why have this discussion while blocking a package release?

Maciej

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Feb  4 20:21:27 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:21:27 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libyaz4, libyaz_devel, yaz
In-Reply-To: <201102041426.p14EQTqn019579@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102041426.p14EQTqn019579@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimpyibZNMqZGLBM6+PH9k2UqLxRDnUgByEo7uWa@mail.gmail.com>

Hurray!
batched



On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Now without bad strings in it.
>
> * yaz: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 4.0.9,REV=2010.06.09
> ?- ? to: 4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04
> ?+ yaz-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ yaz-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libyaz: new package
> ?+ libyaz4-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libyaz4-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libyaz_devel-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libyaz_devel-4.1.2,REV=2011.02.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb  5 10:11:02 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:11:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=oo7FapfFAMNDMQ10=U=5GcGwk65M0J05noUCK@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:11:25 -0800")
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<x662t0qk9s.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=oo7FapfFAMNDMQ10=U=5GcGwk65M0J05noUCK@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6fws2q21l.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?
>>
>> The change in the REV stanza is not enough?
>
> well, making it REV=2001.01.17.patched  or something would be fine too.
> I think its important to let our users know, "this is not just
> rdesktop 1.6.0 source".
>
> Naming it rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2011.01.17 as it currently stands,
> implies that it is just pure 1.6.0
> Mentioning it in the README is nice, but I think we need to be more
> accurate in the naming.
> It is after all, "version naming". We are misrepresenting "this is
> rdesktop version 1.6.0".
>
> It would be nice to have some kind of opencsw standard, "this is
> patched" naming addon.
> (for feature patch, not just "make it compile on solaris/relocate to /opt/csw")
>
> This is one reason I hate the openssh people:
> The nice simple standard for us, would be
>
> software-#.#.#p, p=="patched".

Almost every package among the 110 that I maintain have patches. This is
nominal for every packaging project, viz. Debian. This is why I think
that we should provide source packages with the patches that we
apply. Also, this is why I think that it's not required to add a special
identifier to our packages when a patch is applied.
-- 
Peter

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb  5 10:13:45 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:13:45 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:59:07 -0800")
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> ...
>> We don't know - but simply assume - that people actually care whether
>> dialog comes with additional dependencies. OTOH, what we do know for
>> sure is that support for different terminals is definitly more robust
>> and less likely to break when apps are linked to our CSWncurses (because
>> this implies TERMINFO=/opt/csw/share/terminfo).
>>
>> So why the heck do we go in circles around this topic every time it pops
>> up?
>
> Well, we do know for a fact that some of our "customers" do care about
> size of packages, and needless downloads.

Can you give some examples of "customers" caring for that?
-- 
Peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Feb  5 15:38:29 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:38:29 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <x6fws2q21l.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<x662t0qk9s.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=oo7FapfFAMNDMQ10=U=5GcGwk65M0J05noUCK@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6fws2q21l.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1296916260-sup-4100@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Sat Feb 05 04:11:02 -0500 2011:

Hi Peter,

> Almost every package among the 110 that I maintain have
> patches. This is nominal for every packaging project,
> viz. Debian. This is why I think that we should provide source
> packages with the patches that we apply. Also, this is why I think
> that it's not required to add a special identifier to our packages
> when a patch is applied.

There is a difference between 'patch to make it work' and 'patch to
add a feature.'  (...If you'll grant me that fact that the working in
the first place doesn't count as a feature :) ) One is essential to
operation, the other more akin to a local fork.  This isn't uncommon
in packaging projects, I agree, but I think it is potentially worth
noting.

The patch to make it work case is less likely to cause problems that
require maintainer time and in-depth source knowledge to fix.  The
patch to add a feature is more likely to do so.  There is more of a
'contract' involved when you cherry-pick upstream patches or make
local modifications of your own design.

I don't think we need to denote every portability patch, but
feature/backport patches do warrant some sort of note.  Is README.CSW
prominent enough?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  It should likely be in there
for completeness if nothing else.

The REV string is a good place to stick this info though.  It's part
of the filename, which isn't really useful by itself, but it also
shows up in pkgparam output.  It's completely trivial to add this
information to the REV string.

Just a few early morning thoughts.  Later today I'll go poke at the
Debian standards as I _think_ they have special handling for this too.

As to your other point, we do need to get a standardized source
package though.  This is just one place where it would be beneficial.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Feb  5 15:53:03 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 06:53:03 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:
>
>> Well, we do know for a fact that some of our "customers" do care about
>> size of packages, and needless downloads.
>
> Can you give some examples of "customers" caring for that?
>

Customers have previously filed bug reports, and emailed complaints,
about certain packages having needless dependancies and thus forcing
download of more than they need/want.
Sorry I dont have a convenient reference for this.
You can also consider googling for comments about why some people
didnt like blastwave packaging. One of the complaints people blogged
about, was because it duplicated packages already present in solaris.
I dont think that attitude has suddenly changed either.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Feb  5 18:17:31 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:17:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1296926127-sup-3591@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Sat Feb 05 09:53:03 -0500 2011:

> Customers have previously filed bug reports, and emailed complaints,
> about certain packages having needless dependancies and thus forcing
> download of more than they need/want.  Sorry I dont have a
> convenient reference for this.  You can also consider googling for
> comments about why some people didnt like blastwave packaging. One
> of the complaints people blogged about, was because it duplicated
> packages already present in solaris.  I dont think that attitude has
> suddenly changed either.

While I'm personally ok with dependencies that add great (eye of the
beholder of course) functionality and don't mind a few extra kb
sitting around, the thing that really matters here is that you're
personally willing to roll the 'lite' version. :)

Alternatives makes it easy to provide both versions and that is a
definite win regardless of which side of the fence you prefer.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb  5 18:45:34 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:45:34 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Sat, 5 Feb 2011 06:53:03 -0800")
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:
>>
>>> Well, we do know for a fact that some of our "customers" do care about
>>> size of packages, and needless downloads.
>>
>> Can you give some examples of "customers" caring for that?
>>
>
> Customers have previously filed bug reports, and emailed complaints,
> about certain packages having needless dependancies and thus forcing
> download of more than they need/want.
> Sorry I dont have a convenient reference for this.
> You can also consider googling for comments about why some people
> didnt like blastwave packaging. One of the complaints people blogged
> about, was because it duplicated packages already present in solaris.
> I dont think that attitude has suddenly changed either.

That I know but it's not the same thing. Duplication of packages is not
the same issue that we discuss, which is payload size. Consequently, for
me, it's not a good example.
-- 
Peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Feb  5 23:15:07 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:15:07 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> You can also consider googling for comments about why some people
>> didnt like blastwave packaging. One of the complaints people blogged
>> about, was because it duplicated packages already present in solaris.
>> I dont think that attitude has suddenly changed either.
>
> That I know but it's not the same thing. Duplication of packages is not
> the same issue that we discuss, which is payload size.

It's not quite the same thing, but it tracks.

Consider the issue of depending on some CSW version of libFoo, which
is technically "newer" than /usr/lib/libFoo.
If /usr/lib/libFoo is "good enough", then those people would prefer us
to use that version, rather than the newer version.

In essence, that's what libncurses is: a "newer" version of
/usr/lib/libcurses.so
And for many purposes, the "old version in /usr/lib" is "good enough".

I'm sure there are ways for you to further split hairs on this, but
lets not bother going down that road.
 I dont dispute that there are cases where ncurses is more useful.
I hope you will give me the same courtesy in conceding that there are
cases where it is not.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Feb  6 02:15:45 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 02:15:45 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
Message-ID: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>

A takover from Mike Watters.

Adds a patch (already pushed upstream[1]) which will probably allow to build
the _ctypes Python module on i386.

There are two renames in this release:

- libffi is renamed to libffi5
- libffidevel is renamed to libffi_dev

No packages depend on libffi, so no transitional package is necessary.

[1] http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2010/msg00016.html

* libffi: new package
  + libffi5-3.0.9,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libffi5-3.0.9,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libffi_dev-3.0.9,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libffi_dev-3.0.9,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sun Feb  6 13:01:40 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:01:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:15:07 -0800")
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>> You can also consider googling for comments about why some people
>>> didnt like blastwave packaging. One of the complaints people blogged
>>> about, was because it duplicated packages already present in solaris.
>>> I dont think that attitude has suddenly changed either.
>>
>> That I know but it's not the same thing. Duplication of packages is not
>> the same issue that we discuss, which is payload size.
>
> It's not quite the same thing, but it tracks.
>
> Consider the issue of depending on some CSW version of libFoo, which
> is technically "newer" than /usr/lib/libFoo.
> If /usr/lib/libFoo is "good enough", then those people would prefer us
> to use that version, rather than the newer version.
>
> In essence, that's what libncurses is: a "newer" version of
> /usr/lib/libcurses.so
> And for many purposes, the "old version in /usr/lib" is "good enough".
>
> I'm sure there are ways for you to further split hairs on this, but
> lets not bother going down that road.
>  I dont dispute that there are cases where ncurses is more useful.
> I hope you will give me the same courtesy in conceding that there are
> cases where it is not.

I courteously concedes that software with less features, less quality,
viz. bugs, can be a choice for some people. And this is not
tetrapyloctomy but masochism.
-- 
Peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sun Feb  6 14:42:19 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:42:19 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs geolitedb, pm_geoippureperl
Message-ID: <201102061342.p16DgJSD008526@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_geoippureperl: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.23,REV=2009.03.10
  -   to: 1.25,REV=2011.02.06
  + pm_geoippureperl-1.25,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* geolitedb: major version upgrade
  - from: 100302,REV=2010.03.29
  -   to: 110201,REV=2011.02.06
  + geolitedb-110201,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Sun Feb  6 23:14:07 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:14:07 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> A takover from Mike Watters.
>
> Adds a patch (already pushed upstream[1]) which will probably allow to build
> the _ctypes Python module on i386.
>
> There are two renames in this release:
>
> - libffi is renamed to libffi5

Thanks for the heads up on that.


> - libffidevel is renamed to libffi_dev

erm... I asked Dagobert about this a few days ago for one of his
packages,(well, its actually relevant to TWO, but I only asked on one
of them) but no reply.

Would you please remind me where and when it was agreed upon to start
naming things "dev" instead of "devel"?

_devel has been our defacto standard for a long time.
we have 4 packages with _dev. but over 100 with _devel.

From phil at opencsw.org  Sun Feb  6 23:19:32 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:19:32 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs geolitedb, pm_geoippureperl
In-Reply-To: <201102061342.p16DgJSD008526@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102061342.p16DgJSD008526@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikohxMqMmi+=Sy-RYf-7peFmQvmxwbtWUOsfWmZ@mail.gmail.com>

FYI, there are spurious comments in both of them,

# default path /usr/local/share/GeoIP

but since it would seem the functional default path is not that, it
seems okay to publish them.



On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_geoippureperl: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.23,REV=2009.03.10
> ?- ? to: 1.25,REV=2011.02.06
> ?+ pm_geoippureperl-1.25,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * geolitedb: major version upgrade
> ?- from: 100302,REV=2010.03.29
> ?- ? to: 110201,REV=2011.02.06
> ?+ geolitedb-110201,REV=2011.02.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Feb  6 23:36:58 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 22:36:58 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/6 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> A takover from Mike Watters.
>>
>> Adds a patch (already pushed upstream[1]) which will probably allow to build
>> the _ctypes Python module on i386.
>>
>> There are two renames in this release:
>>
>> - libffi is renamed to libffi5
>
> Thanks for the heads up on that.
>
>
>> - libffidevel is renamed to libffi_dev
>
> erm... I asked Dagobert about this a few days ago for one of his
> packages,(well, its actually relevant to TWO, but I only asked on one
> of them) but no reply.
>
> Would you please remind me where and when it was agreed upon to start
> naming things "dev" instead of "devel"?

> _devel has been our defacto standard for a long time.
> we have 4 packages with _dev. but over 100 with _devel.

According to Dago[1], there are 4 different suffixes to dev packages
in use.  In a discussion about standardizing on one of them, there
were 4 voices [2] [3] [4] [5] supporting the -dev suffix.  There were
no voices against.  I conclude that there's consensus to use "-dev".

Maciej

[1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html
[2] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013546.html
[3] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013547.html
[4] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
[5] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013564.html

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 01:09:09 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:09:09 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/6 Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
>
>> _devel has been our defacto standard for a long time.
>> we have 4 packages with _dev. but over 100 with _devel.
>
> According to Dago[1], there are 4 different suffixes to dev packages
> in use. ?In a discussion about standardizing on one of them, there
> were 4 voices [2] [3] [4] [5] supporting the -dev suffix. ?There were
> no voices against. ?I conclude that there's consensus to use "-dev".
>
> Maciej
>
> [1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html
> [2] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013546.html
> [3] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013547.html
> [4] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
> [5] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013564.html


Thank you for doing the research.
I acknowlge that there was previous discussion on the issue, and that
there were no "dissents" at that time.

That being said:
- renames are a pain in the butt
- there are **over 100 of them to be done
- the likelyhood of all of them getting done in less than a year, is
very small. My guess is, it would take 2 years to get them all.

If the end goal is "consistency", then the plan that will get us
"consistent" the fastest, is to pick _devel as the official standard.
I will also note, tha the *original* proposal, as you referenced, in
http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html

was actually "devel".

Given the preponderance of packages with _devel, my definate vote is
against _dev, and for _devel.

Peter F was a little ambiguous in his email which you referenced,
http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
where he says renames are "not a great deal".
It is unclear to me if that means "not a big deal", or "not a good thing"
If the latter, it could be a vote for devel, and against -dev.
Which would make it 3 to 2; rather not a "consensus" any more.


Peter mentioned a "later email" on it, but I dont have time to search right now.

100 renames to get to "consistency", vs 4 renames, seems like a rather
backwards approach.
I think this should be put to an official vote, rather than
'consensus'. With clarity about the point that if the goal is merely
"consistency", then _devel is the obvious choice in front of us.

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 10:01:50 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:01:50 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:09:09 -0800")
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x639o0nrpd.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:

> 2011/2/6 Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
>>
>>> _devel has been our defacto standard for a long time.
>>> we have 4 packages with _dev. but over 100 with _devel.
>>
>> According to Dago[1], there are 4 different suffixes to dev packages
>> in use. ?In a discussion about standardizing on one of them, there
>> were 4 voices [2] [3] [4] [5] supporting the -dev suffix. ?There were
>> no voices against. ?I conclude that there's consensus to use "-dev".
>>
>> Maciej
>>
>> [1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html
>> [2] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013546.html
>> [3] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013547.html
>> [4] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
>> [5] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013564.html
>
>
> Thank you for doing the research.
> I acknowlge that there was previous discussion on the issue, and that
> there were no "dissents" at that time.
>
> That being said:
> - renames are a pain in the butt
> - there are **over 100 of them to be done
> - the likelyhood of all of them getting done in less than a year, is
> very small. My guess is, it would take 2 years to get them all.
>
> If the end goal is "consistency", then the plan that will get us
> "consistent" the fastest, is to pick _devel as the official standard.
> I will also note, tha the *original* proposal, as you referenced, in
> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html
>
> was actually "devel".
>
> Given the preponderance of packages with _devel, my definate vote is
> against _dev, and for _devel.
>
> Peter F was a little ambiguous in his email which you referenced,
> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
> where he says renames are "not a great deal".
> It is unclear to me if that means "not a big deal", or "not a good thing"

"not a big deal" != "not a good thing"

> If the latter, it could be a vote for devel, and against -dev.
> Which would make it 3 to 2; rather not a "consensus" any more.

As it wasn't the latter, it's a vote for -dev and that makes 3 votes for
-dev and 2 against.

> 100 renames to get to "consistency", vs 4 renames, seems like a rather
> backwards approach.
> I think this should be put to an official vote, rather than
> 'consensus'. With clarity about the point that if the goal is merely
> "consistency", then _devel is the obvious choice in front of us.

I'm all for voting, as usual.
-- 
Peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 10:25:58 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:25:58 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <x639o0nrpd.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
	<x639o0nrpd.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimBQUEH8PZexEVZJ20Z1GRT=t+zRe6hnyiaUcUv@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/7 Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org>:
> Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:
>
>> 2011/2/6 Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
>>>
>>>> _devel has been our defacto standard for a long time.
>>>> we have 4 packages with _dev. but over 100 with _devel.
>>>
>>> According to Dago[1], there are 4 different suffixes to dev packages
>>> in use. ?In a discussion about standardizing on one of them, there
>>> were 4 voices [2] [3] [4] [5] supporting the -dev suffix. ?There were
>>> no voices against. ?I conclude that there's consensus to use "-dev".
>>>
>>> Maciej
>>>
>>> [1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html
>>> [2] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013546.html
>>> [3] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013547.html
>>> [4] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
>>> [5] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013564.html
>>
>>
>> Thank you for doing the research.
>> I acknowlge that there was previous discussion on the issue, and that
>> there were no "dissents" at that time.
>>
>> That being said:
>> - renames are a pain in the butt
>> - there are **over 100 of them to be done
>> - the likelyhood of all of them getting done in less than a year, is
>> very small. My guess is, it would take 2 years to get them all.
>>
>> If the end goal is "consistency", then the plan that will get us
>> "consistent" the fastest, is to pick _devel as the official standard.
>> I will also note, tha the *original* proposal, as you referenced, in
>> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013541.html
>>
>> was actually "devel".

Yes, but in a later e-mail[6] Dago prefers -dev and doesn't change his
opinion afterwards.

[6] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013546.html

>> Given the preponderance of packages with _devel, my definate vote is
>> against _dev, and for _devel.
>>
>> Peter F was a little ambiguous in his email which you referenced,
>> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-December/013548.html
>> where he says renames are "not a great deal".
>> It is unclear to me if that means "not a big deal", or "not a good thing"
>
> "not a big deal" != "not a good thing"
>
>> If the latter, it could be a vote for devel, and against -dev.
>> Which would make it 3 to 2; rather not a "consensus" any more.
>
> As it wasn't the latter, it's a vote for -dev and that makes 3 votes for
> -dev and 2 against.

Taking into account Dago's current opinion (as far as I can tell), it
looks like it's 4 vs 1.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 11:20:48 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:20:48 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimADX4zUH5pxD=5PTtPp3KZroh1A7Q4nnvo02gF@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/7 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
> That being said:
> - renames are a pain in the butt
> - there are **over 100 of them to be done

Yes, here are the current counts:

$ for p in devel -devel dev -dev; do echo -n "$p: "; awk < catalog '$3
~ /^CSW.*[^-]'$p'$/' | wc -l; done
devel: 99
-devel: 31
dev: 9
-dev: 3

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 12:08:20 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:08:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <69285A7C-5229-402B-81FF-1C57AC481FB3@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 07.02.2011 um 01:09 schrieb Philip Brown:
> I acknowlge that there was previous discussion on the issue, and that
> there were no "dissents" at that time.
> 
> That being said:
> - renames are a pain in the butt

I would say that this needs to be changed. We have a lot of
inconsistency anyway and need a formal method to deprecate
packages as standard procedure.

> - there are **over 100 of them to be done
> - the likelyhood of all of them getting done in less than a year, is
> very small. My guess is, it would take 2 years to get them all.

I would guess most of them are from me :-)


Best regards

  -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 12:12:03 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:12:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimADX4zUH5pxD=5PTtPp3KZroh1A7Q4nnvo02gF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimADX4zUH5pxD=5PTtPp3KZroh1A7Q4nnvo02gF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ADA1CBAB-0098-4805-B5DE-203C1A940D9D@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 07.02.2011 um 11:20 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski:
> 2011/2/7 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
>> That being said:
>> - renames are a pain in the butt
>> - there are **over 100 of them to be done
> 
> Yes, here are the current counts:
> 
> $ for p in devel -devel dev -dev; do echo -n "$p: "; awk < catalog '$3
> ~ /^CSW.*[^-]'$p'$/' | wc -l; done
> devel: 99

This was the old standard when packages names where not to have "-" in
the names.

> -devel: 31

This was the newer standard after inclusion of "-" had been relaced.

> dev: 9

This never was a standard.

> -dev: 3

This is the latest standard.

Personally I prefer something with a "-" in there to cleanly
separate stem and extension, but I have no strong opinion on
-dev/-devel, although I also prefer the shorter -dev leaving more
room for package names and being consistent with other distributions.
And: After we fixate this now this is not going to be changed until
*all* misnamed packages have been fixed or dropped, ok?


Best regards

  -- Dago



From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 12:18:23 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:18:23 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9C7E7C7D-7D96-4C83-92B6-A09457D5466E@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 06.02.2011 um 23:14 schrieb Philip Brown:
> erm... I asked Dagobert about this a few days ago for one of his
> packages,(well, its actually relevant to TWO, but I only asked on one
> of them) but no reply.


I am a bit oversubscribed lately, sorry. See my other post about this.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Feb  7 15:58:05 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 06:58:05 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimADX4zUH5pxD=5PTtPp3KZroh1A7Q4nnvo02gF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimADX4zUH5pxD=5PTtPp3KZroh1A7Q4nnvo02gF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=SwYgOo82j9AVvk8zECQBV-c9S3Ktz4oOi4RRW@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/7 Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
> 2011/2/7 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
>> That being said:
>> - renames are a pain in the butt
>> - there are **over 100 of them to be done
>
> Yes, here are the current counts:
>
> $ for p in devel -devel dev -dev; do echo -n "$p: "; awk < catalog '$3
> ~ /^CSW.*[^-]'$p'$/' | wc -l; done
> devel: 99
> -devel: 31
> dev: 9
> -dev: 3


side note, for the curious:  If you look at the software name, instead
of catalog name, you get
126 _devel, 6 devel

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Feb  7 16:02:45 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:02:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libffi5, libffi_dev
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=SwYgOo82j9AVvk8zECQBV-c9S3Ktz4oOi4RRW@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102060115.p161FjKZ012316@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikV3y4OhD5PT0s06qMoKSSqfJG_ZemMMqNoo3Ey@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVHN90TOerM9-uo7_s5tx9j5B56pYUgySs=aTR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimLgS92eyUZvuek8BDyTdUL7LBLLmXDbWDaCa51@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimADX4zUH5pxD=5PTtPp3KZroh1A7Q4nnvo02gF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=SwYgOo82j9AVvk8zECQBV-c9S3Ktz4oOi4RRW@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik1TL7vMTvg9WU6oC3E538eouE3iNR8YbmTiGW_@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/7 Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
>...
>> $ for p in devel -devel dev -dev; do echo -n "$p: "; awk < catalog '$3
>> ~ /^CSW.*[^-]'$p'$/' | wc -l; done
>> devel: 99
>> -devel: 31
>> dev: 9
>> -dev: 3
>
>
> side note, for the curious: ?If you look at the software name, instead
> of catalog name, you get
> 126 _devel, 6 devel

also, you may have doublecounted dev entries.
I'm getting 9 total 'dev$', not 9+3.

Oddly, you didnt doublecount 'devel$' somehow.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 16:39:17 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:39:17 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_gdata
Message-ID: <201102071539.p17FdHkF003241@login.bo.opencsw.org>

The pkgname was changed from CSWpygdata to CSWpy-gdata.  The catalogname
stayed the same.

* py_gdata: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.0.3,REV=2009.10.15
  -   to: 2.0.13,REV=2011.02.07
  + py_gdata-2.0.13,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Feb  7 18:15:25 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:15:25 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_gdata
In-Reply-To: <201102071539.p17FdHkF003241@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102071539.p17FdHkF003241@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-7+fAVqaae6BR8dBRqa_D_5K8Eax3SmPx41Ko@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/7/11, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> The pkgname was changed from CSWpygdata to CSWpy-gdata.  The catalogname
> stayed the same.


Thanks for the heads up.

batched.


> * py_gdata: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 2.0.3,REV=2009.10.15
>   -   to: 2.0.13,REV=2011.02.07
>   + py_gdata-2.0.13,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Feb  7 21:19:19 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:19:19 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs clamav, libclam6, libclam6_devel
Message-ID: <201102072019.p17KJJAG007069@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* clam: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.96.5,REV=2010.12.01
  -   to: 0.97,REV=2011.02.07
  + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Feb  7 22:31:41 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:31:41 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs clamav, libclam6, libclam6_devel
In-Reply-To: <201102072019.p17KJJAG007069@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102072019.p17KJJAG007069@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=1swYdtOQErWU9GLGuoOkdiPjcPBDj1_xUshC7@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On 2/7/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * clam: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.96.5,REV=2010.12.01
>   -   to: 0.97,REV=2011.02.07
>   + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + clamav-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libclam6_devel-0.97,REV=2011.02.07-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Feb  8 02:30:49 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:30:49 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Sun Feb 06 07:01:40 -0500 2011:

> I courteously concedes that software with less features, less
> quality, viz. bugs, can be a choice for some people. And this is not
> tetrapyloctomy but masochism.

The masochistic choice is now ready.  The GAR recipe is updated such
that both versions are built.

Phil: If you run gmake package from the dialog/trunk directory, you'll get
      the CSWdialog-minimal package.  It needs to have the release
      coordinated with Peter's update to add the alternatives support,
      which is also ready with a simple re-roll.  I don't imagine
      Peter wants his name on the bug tracker for this.

Peter: You already know the drill. :)

There is a strange checkpkg error that can be ignored (libncurses.so.5
stuff) as it's not correct.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb  8 02:41:23 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:41:23 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/7/11, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Sun Feb 06 07:01:40 -0500 2011:
>
>> I courteously concedes that software with less features, less
>> quality, viz. bugs, can be a choice for some people. And this is not
>> tetrapyloctomy but masochism.
>
> The masochistic choice is now ready.  The GAR recipe is updated such
> that both versions are built.
>
> Phil: If you run gmake package from the dialog/trunk directory, you'll get
>       the CSWdialog-minimal package.  It needs to have the release
>       coordinated with Peter's update to add the alternatives support,
>       which is also ready with a simple re-roll.  I don't imagine
>       Peter wants his name on the bug tracker for this.
>

This is a bit silly.
If its all in one, then Peter can submit both packages generated when
he does a 'make'.
It makes no sense for both of us to be building the thing separately,
yet redundantly.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Feb  8 03:02:47 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:02:47 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297130391-sup-5616@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Feb 07 20:41:23 -0500 2011:

> This is a bit silly.
> If its all in one, then Peter can submit both packages generated when
> he does a 'make'.

Peter has no interest in this version.  If he did, he would have
released this option himself.  You do have interest and indicated you
think others will too.

Thus, I think it makes sense for you to submit it so that it's
registered to your name.  Peter shouldn't need to handle any potential
bugs for something he has no interest in.  My only interest in this is
ensuring that we don't have the ncurses version in GAR while your
minimal version is elsewhere.

> It makes no sense for both of us to be building the thing
> separately, yet redundantly.

Well, if you ask me, the minimal version is of little use at all, but
since you seemed to think it worthwhile, here it is.  It's not Peter's
burden though.  If you don't want to release build it, then don't
release it and leave Peter's version as is without alternatives
support.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb  8 03:12:42 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:12:42 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297130391-sup-5616@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297130391-sup-5616@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimYWR1=t1HaNztzovc6DQ7h9TJse=Xm2dNBYvx=@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/7/11, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Feb 07 20:41:23 -0500 2011:
>
>> It makes no sense for both of us to be building the thing
>> separately, yet redundantly.
>
> Well, if you ask me, the minimal version is of little use at all, but
> since you seemed to think it worthwhile, here it is.  It's not Peter's
> burden though.  If you don't want to release build it, then don't
> release it and leave Peter's version as is without alternatives
> support.
>

If Peter does not want to submit the autogenerated "minimal" package
that you imply is built by a simple "make", then I will build one in a
separate area.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Feb  8 03:25:19 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:25:19 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimYWR1=t1HaNztzovc6DQ7h9TJse=Xm2dNBYvx=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297130391-sup-5616@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYWR1=t1HaNztzovc6DQ7h9TJse=Xm2dNBYvx=@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297131831-sup-9720@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Feb 07 21:12:42 -0500 2011:

> If Peter does not want to submit the autogenerated "minimal" package
> that you imply is built by a simple "make", then I will build one in
> a separate area.

Please do not clutter the source tree for an existing build
description with NIH.  The only reason I even support offering this
crippled version is because GAR can keep it sane (version synced, easy
to crank out, etc).

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From gmarler at opencsw.org  Tue Feb  8 18:05:51 2011
From: gmarler at opencsw.org (Gordon Marler)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:05:51 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
Message-ID: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Update of findutils to properly set up GNU links

Corresponding update to gnulinks package (tested by Dagobert) that remove the links
that are now in the findutils pkg

* findutils: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.06.08
  -   to: 2011.02.08
  + findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* gnulinks: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.10.11
  -   to: 2011.01.11
  + gnulinks-1.4,REV=2011.01.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 03:00:28 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:28 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Feb 07 20:41:23 -0500 2011:

> This is a bit silly.

Yes, I agree that a non-ncurses version of dialog is silly.

> If its all in one, then Peter can submit both packages generated when
> he does a 'make'.

He has no interest in this.  More below...

> It makes no sense for both of us to be building the thing
> separately, yet redundantly.

Ok, so run gmake package-CSWdialog-minimal and don't generate the
ncurses version.

My support for an alternatives based solution to this rests on 2
things:

1. That doing so causes no extra work for Peter or any other
   maintainer that thinks this version of the package isn't
   worthwhile.
2. That providing the minimal version does not pollute the build tree
   with redundant directories or build processes.  [This is for
   dialog, I'm not forcing the issue on other packages here.]

I understand that you don't care for GAR (more below...) so I did the
work to shield you from using it.  You indicated:

If Peter does not want to submit the autogenerated "minimal" package
that you imply is built by a simple "make", then I will build one in a
separate area.

To which I say: And why won't you submit the package that is built by
a simple make?  You're going to add either a separate directory in the
tree for the same source package or an alternate Makefile of some
sort.  This is unacceptable in either case, imo.

You even intimated (off list) that you might just use GAR for this
since it already 'just works.'  That makes your avoidance of this
silver platter version even worse.

I fully withdraw my support for providing the non-ncurses version of
dialog unless both 1 and 2 above are met.  In this event, I'd simply
roll back the changes I added to this build recipe as I, personally,
see no value in offering a crippled version of dialog.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From gadavis at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 05:28:54 2011
From: gadavis at opencsw.org (Geoff Davis)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 05:28:54 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gmtcoast_full, gmtcoast_high,
	gmtcoast_low
Message-ID: <201102090428.p194Ssdf029791@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Repackage to reflect fixed PKGFILES regex. The low res package now only has
the low res files, which makes for a significantly smaller download.

Thanks to James for the suggestion.

* gmtcoast: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.02.01
  -   to: 2011.02.09
  + gmtcoast_full-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gmtcoast_high-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gmtcoast_low-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 06:24:13 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:24:13 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Feb 07 20:41:23 -0500 2011:
>
>> This is a bit silly.
>
> Yes, I agree that a non-ncurses version of dialog is silly.
>
>> If its all in one, then Peter can submit both packages generated when
>> he does a 'make'.
>
> He has no interest in this. ?More below...
>
>> It makes no sense for both of us to be building the thing
>> separately, yet redundantly.
>
> Ok, so run gmake package-CSWdialog-minimal and don't generate the
> ncurses version.


That's more like it. that's less a waste of my time.
I will give that a shot.
I reserve the right to move things to my own liking, if I run into
difficulties with it.

Hopefully, there is also a make target for Peter, that doesnt waste
HIS time building packages he's not going to submit.

I shall wait for Peter to submit an "alternatives" enabled dialog,
before tackling the dialog-minimal package.

From skayser at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 10:16:59 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:16:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>

* Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > ...
> > We don't know - but simply assume - that people actually care whether
> > dialog comes with additional dependencies. OTOH, what we do know for
> > sure is that support for different terminals is definitly more robust
> > and less likely to break when apps are linked to our CSWncurses (because
> > this implies TERMINFO=/opt/csw/share/terminfo).
> >
> > So why the heck do we go in circles around this topic every time it pops
> > up?
> 
> Well, we do know for a fact that some of our "customers" do care about
> size of packages, and needless downloads.
> The question then becomes whether or not it is "needless".
> 
> It seems clear that for those customers that dont care about color, it
> is needless.
> What other examples of "breakage" do you know of?

SSH from a Mac (default TERM=xterm-color) to a Solaris box and start a
curses application. curses which doesn't know about xterm-color will
complain and present you with a severly crippled terminal experience.

$ uname -a
SunOS rigel 5.9 Generic_112233-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-i2
$ echo $TERM                                                      
xterm-color

$ /usr/ccs/bin/dump -Lv /usr/bin/less | grep NEEDED               
[1]     NEEDED          libcurses.so.1
[2]     NEEDED          libc.so.1

$ /usr/bin/less /etc/release                                      
WARNING: terminal is not fully functional
/etc/release  (press RETURN)

While we technically can't do anything about Solaris-delivered
applications, we can ensure that our own stack doesn't show such issues
by consequently linking against CSWncurses. Think: "to provide a
straightforward, easy-to-use experience for the user".

Additionally, we can add a section to the user guide that tells people
to install CSWterminfo and set TERMINFO=/opt/csw/share/terminfo. That
way we then also help to cover Solaris-delivered curses apps for those
who care to read the guide.

Sebastian

From skayser at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 10:19:39 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:19:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <20110209091939.GX21610@sebastiankayser.de>

* Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > We don't know - but simply assume - that people actually care whether
> > > dialog comes with additional dependencies. OTOH, what we do know for
> > > sure is that support for different terminals is definitly more robust
> > > and less likely to break when apps are linked to our CSWncurses (because
> > > this implies TERMINFO=/opt/csw/share/terminfo).
> > >
> > > So why the heck do we go in circles around this topic every time it pops
> > > up?
> > 
> > Well, we do know for a fact that some of our "customers" do care about
> > size of packages, and needless downloads.
> > The question then becomes whether or not it is "needless".
> > 
> > It seems clear that for those customers that dont care about color, it
> > is needless.
> > What other examples of "breakage" do you know of?
> 
> SSH from a Mac (default TERM=xterm-color) to a Solaris box and start a
> curses application. curses which doesn't know about xterm-color will
> complain and present you with a severly crippled terminal experience.

s/Solaris box/Solaris 9 box/

Sebastian

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 16:05:03 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:05:03 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimr_iRp4gASWLd97fmnDzfNMDAPMCTvprFXmUOD@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
> SSH from a Mac (default TERM=xterm-color) to a Solaris box and start a
> curses application. curses which doesn't know about xterm-color will
> complain and present you with a severly crippled terminal experience.

There are ways to make color terminals relatively happy with standard
solaris curses.
(I believe, setting TERM=xtermc, rather than xterm-color)
And for the record (and something which you probably know already, but
others might not)
Solaris 10 understands "xterm-color" just fine.

From skayser at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 17:24:29 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:24:29 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr_iRp4gASWLd97fmnDzfNMDAPMCTvprFXmUOD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTimr_iRp4gASWLd97fmnDzfNMDAPMCTvprFXmUOD@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110209162429.GY21610@sebastiankayser.de>

* Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > SSH from a Mac (default TERM=xterm-color) to a Solaris box and start a
> > curses application. curses which doesn't know about xterm-color will
> > complain and present you with a severly crippled terminal experience.
> 
> There are ways to make color terminals relatively happy with standard
> solaris curses. (I believe, setting TERM=xtermc, rather than
> xterm-color)

True, as an effort on the side of each single users out there, while we
could very easily provide a software stack which doesn't need a
workaround by the user.

> And for the record (and something which you probably know already, but
> others might not) Solaris 10 understands "xterm-color" just fine.

Yes, fully (not probably) aware, that's what the Solaris 9 clarification
mail was for. Add other common TERMs (like rxvt or screen where we
worked around it in a lengthy bug discussion) into the mix and the issue
also applies Solaris 10.

Thus, we still have a disfunctionality that we can easily fix vs. the
stance that dependencies on CSWncurses are evil. Where does this
objection against this dependency come from? Anyone still needs to
transfer packages over 9.6k modem lines or transfer them via floppy?

Honestly, who is sitting in front of his computer and realizes in horror
"F***, I need to have pkgutil fully automatically download me _two_
additional packages"?

Sebastian

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 18:11:32 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:11:32 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <20110209162429.GY21610@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTimr_iRp4gASWLd97fmnDzfNMDAPMCTvprFXmUOD@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209162429.GY21610@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=pUXj99qS0nenqLJJj0rcTd4hTi75AbE96Cdza@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, fully (not probably) aware, that's what the Solaris 9 clarification
> mail was for. Add other common TERMs (like rxvt or screen where we
> worked around it in a lengthy bug discussion) into the mix and the issue
> also applies Solaris 10.

I recognize your point of "[other, newer TERM types arent handled well
by native solaris]".
That being said, we could (and probably *should*) handle that sort of
thing better at the individual package level.
For example, rxvt could ship terminfo entries for itself.
Ditto for screen.

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 21:57:11 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:57:11 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>

Hmm. lots of /usr/local, but all in find.info. Seems trivial, so ignored.
On the other hand, findutils has a dependancy on CSWiconv, which
checkpkg seems to think is unneccessary.
You were probably just copying from the old package which also has it.
Maybe you should remove it?


On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gordon Marler <gmarler at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Update of findutils to properly set up GNU links
>
> Corresponding update to gnulinks package (tested by Dagobert) that remove the links
> that are now in the findutils pkg
>
> * findutils: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2009.06.08
> ?- ? to: 2011.02.08
> ?+ findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * gnulinks: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.10.11
> ?- ? to: 2011.01.11
> ?+ gnulinks-1.4,REV=2011.01.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb  9 22:06:00 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:06:00 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gmtcoast_full, gmtcoast_high,
	gmtcoast_low
In-Reply-To: <201102090428.p194Ssdf029791@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102090428.p194Ssdf029791@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikdo3mdpeCqkgoiUHB-qjxcx43xWq+k8SJL9fOL@mail.gmail.com>

Great. batched.

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Geoff Davis <gadavis at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Repackage to reflect fixed PKGFILES regex. The low res package now only has
> the low res files, which makes for a significantly smaller download.
>
> Thanks to James for the suggestion.
>
> * gmtcoast: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2011.02.01
> ?- ? to: 2011.02.09
> ?+ gmtcoast_full-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gmtcoast_high-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gmtcoast_low-2.1.0,REV=2011.02.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 00:10:46 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:10:46 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/9 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
> Hmm. lots of /usr/local, but all in find.info. Seems trivial, so ignored.
> On the other hand, findutils has a dependancy on CSWiconv, which
> checkpkg seems to think is unneccessary.
> You were probably just copying from the old package which also has it.
> Maybe you should remove it?

I've looked at the build description, and I found this line:

CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWfindutils += surplus-dependency|CSWiconv

Checkpkg did report this surplus dependency, but it was overriden in r10809.

From skayser at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 01:38:57 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:38:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=pUXj99qS0nenqLJJj0rcTd4hTi75AbE96Cdza@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTimr_iRp4gASWLd97fmnDzfNMDAPMCTvprFXmUOD@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209162429.GY21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=pUXj99qS0nenqLJJj0rcTd4hTi75AbE96Cdza@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110210003857.GZ21610@sebastiankayser.de>

* Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, fully (not probably) aware, that's what the Solaris 9 clarification
> > mail was for. Add other common TERMs (like rxvt or screen where we
> > worked around it in a lengthy bug discussion) into the mix and the issue
> > also applies Solaris 10.
> 
> I recognize your point of "[other, newer TERM types arent handled well
> by native solaris]".
> That being said, we could (and probably *should*) handle that sort of
> thing better at the individual package level.
> For example, rxvt could ship terminfo entries for itself.

Can you explain how that would address users SSH'ing from another box
where TERM=rxvt into a Solaris system whose native curses lib (or
terminfo for that matter) and thereby all apps linked against it -
including ours - don't know a thing about TERM=rxvt?

Also, you didn't care to answer my question on your objection reasons
for an easy dependency on CSWncurses (which I perceive as a rather
disturbing behavior of yours in general, i.e. picking out subsections of
an email which you decide to reply to while avoiding other parts).

Sebastian

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 03:00:53 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:53 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <1297303185-sup-2530@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Tue Feb 08 21:00:28 -0500 2011:

> > This is a bit silly.
> 
> Yes, I agree that a non-ncurses version of dialog is silly.

This was an unnecessary comment.  Withdrawn.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 03:23:23 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 18:23:23 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <20110210003857.GZ21610@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209091659.GW21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTimr_iRp4gASWLd97fmnDzfNMDAPMCTvprFXmUOD@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110209162429.GY21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=pUXj99qS0nenqLJJj0rcTd4hTi75AbE96Cdza@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110210003857.GZ21610@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimAn2Eu+VP1ynsyKzjFUQVfsUGenQA2PxiGej15@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> also applies Solaris 10.
>>
>> I recognize your point of "[other, newer TERM types arent handled well
>> by native solaris]".
>> That being said, we could (and probably *should*) handle that sort of
>> thing better at the individual package level.
>> For example, rxvt could ship terminfo entries for itself.
>
> Can you explain how that would address users SSH'ing from another box
> where TERM=rxvt into a Solaris system whose native curses lib (or
> terminfo for that matter) and thereby all apps linked against it -
> including ours - don't know a thing about TERM=rxvt?

?
Our apps dont "need to know" about TERM-rxvt. the curses library needs to know.
As long as rxvt is installed onto the destination solaris system, and
we do things nicer than we do now
(ie: if we install a proper terminfo entry), then the remove client
who uses rxvt, should have a smooth experience, in the situation you
describe.



> Also, you didn't care to answer my question on your objection reasons
> for an easy dependency on CSWncurses (which I perceive as a rather
> disturbing behavior of yours in general, i.e. picking out subsections of
> an email which you decide to reply to while avoiding other parts).

I have already answered this recently on the lists, so I thought you
were being somewhat rhetorical in your grumbling. sorry.
Okay, to quote your original email with those bits:

>.... the
>stance that dependencies on CSWncurses are evil. Where does this
>objection against this dependency come from? Anyone still needs to
>ransfer packages over 9.6k modem lines or transfer them via floppy?
>
>Honestly, who is sitting in front of his computer and realizes in horror
>"F***, I need to have pkgutil fully automatically download me _two_
>additional packages"?

Yes, there really are people who feel that way.

Also, please note that I do not believe that dependencies on ncurses
are evil in ALL cases.
In situations where we're talking about a complex program that uses
fancy curses stuffs heavily (ie: emacs or something), or in cases
where the program is large, or where it already has a large set of
dependencies, then I raise no complaints.

Obviously, this would not normally come to your attention, since "me
NOT sending emails" is not particularly visible, compared to "me
sending complaint emails".

But given that there are.... (I lost count from a quick glance.. 50+?)
programs that depend on ncurses in our catalog, clearly I have to be
okay with ncurses in a large number of cases.

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 05:54:07 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:54:07 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/9 Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
> 2011/2/9 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
>> Hmm. lots of /usr/local, but all in find.info. Seems trivial, so ignored.
>> On the other hand, findutils has a dependancy on CSWiconv, which
>> checkpkg seems to think is unneccessary.
>> You were probably just copying from the old package which also has it.
>> Maybe you should remove it?
>
> I've looked at the build description, and I found this line:
>
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWfindutils += surplus-dependency|CSWiconv
>
> Checkpkg did report this surplus dependency, but it was overriden in r10809.
>

Hrrr... it would have been nice if whoever put that in there, put in a
comment to say *why* they put that in there :(
Any guesses? would be nice to know if its still needed.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 14:31:39 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:31:39 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 23:54:07 -0500 2011:

> Hrrr... it would have been nice if whoever put that in there, put in
> a comment to say *why* they put that in there :( Any guesses? would
> be nice to know if its still needed.

The svn log might be of use for this?  Checkpkg is good at catching
this error in both directions, so if it's not complaining right now,
the override should be removed.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 17:17:53 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:17:53 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 00:24:13 -0500 2011:

> I reserve the right to move things to my own liking, if I run into
> difficulties with it.

And I reserve the right to 'yell' at you if you do.

> I shall wait for Peter to submit an "alternatives" enabled dialog,
> before tackling the dialog-minimal package.

Peter is on a training course and not in normal contact presently.  In
the mean time, please push the current package that does address open
bugs.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 18:38:07 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:38:07 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 23:54:07 -0500 2011:
>
>> Hrrr... it would have been nice if whoever put that in there, put in
>> a comment to say *why* they put that in there :( Any guesses? would
>> be nice to know if its still needed.
>
> The svn log might be of use for this? ?Checkpkg is good at catching
> this error in both directions, so if it's not complaining right now,
> the override should be removed.
>

makes sense to me.
But waiting on a response from "the maintainer".

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 18:40:07 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:40:07 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikuSocbYDXhA3w096dAT_pqfucy5Li0aOqgxPsF@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
>> I shall wait for Peter to submit an "alternatives" enabled dialog,
>> before tackling the dialog-minimal package.
>
> Peter is on a training course and not in normal contact presently. ?In
> the mean time, please push the current package that does address open
> bugs.

sorry, wont do that when I am told there is a newer version coming
soon. it's irritating for the users to be pushed through two update
cycles, when they only need one.
If there were some sort of "emergency" fixes, it would be different.
But there arent.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 20:35:42 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:35:42 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
Message-ID: <201102101935.p1AJZg3v012659@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* dialog: major version upgrade
  - from: 0.9b_20030130,REV=2003.03.18
  -   to: 1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10
  + dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 21:22:02 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:22:02 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <201102101935.p1AJZg3v012659@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102101935.p1AJZg3v012659@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTima+9J+eMW+wz9Ybzu+rQKBBG_1SzQyv7aqGoyZ@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks very much!

Batched.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * dialog: major version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.9b_20030130,REV=2003.03.18
> ?- ? to: 1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10
> ?+ dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 23:31:45 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:31:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 00:24:13 -0500 2011:
>
>> I reserve the right to move things to my own liking, if I run into
>> difficulties with it.
>
> And I reserve the right to 'yell' at you if you do.

it's broken.
 I could "yell" at you for telling me it was so easy and all I had to
do was do that make command, when it Doesnt Work Right.

it creates "dialog-minimal", instead of "dialog_minimal".

I even attempted to glance through the Makefile, to see if there was
an obvious way to fix this.
But there isnt.
Everything is "CSWdialog-minimal", with no bare "dialog-minimal" that I can see.

Again, **this is exactly why I hate gar**. Whenver problems come up,
there is no obvious way to fix them.
You have to be intimately familar with "gar language", instead of Make itself.
Whereas with my way, everything that you might need to tweak, is right
there in the Makefile itself.
One file = easy debugging and easy fixes.

I'll give you a day to fix it, Ben, if you wish.
Otherwise: I gave it a shot. i even tried to "fix it" in gar.
GAR FAIL.

so tomorrow I'll redo it my way, if nothing else presents itself.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 10 23:41:43 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:41:43 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=si=SRL3-CG-LDVLgRbGGJYOUD-fF7T+GRXiEP@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 00:24:13 -0500 2011:
>>
>>> I reserve the right to move things to my own liking, if I run into
>>> difficulties with it.
>>
>> And I reserve the right to 'yell' at you if you do.
>
> it's broken.
> ?I could "yell" at you for telling me it was so easy and all I had to
> do was do that make command, when it Doesnt Work Right.
>
> it creates "dialog-minimal", instead of "dialog_minimal".
>
> I even attempted to glance through the Makefile, to see if there was
> an obvious way to fix this.
> But there isnt.
> Everything is "CSWdialog-minimal", with no bare "dialog-minimal" that I can see.
>
> Again, **this is exactly why I hate gar**. Whenver problems come up,
> there is no obvious way to fix them.
> You have to be intimately familar with "gar language", instead of Make itself.
> Whereas with my way, everything that you might need to tweak, is right
> there in the Makefile itself.
> One file = easy debugging and easy fixes.
>
> I'll give you a day to fix it, Ben, if you wish.
> Otherwise: I gave it a shot. i even tried to "fix it" in gar.
> GAR FAIL.
>
> so tomorrow I'll redo it my way, if nothing else presents itself.

I don't know how you managed to do that. Here's the files I got from
"gmake platforms":

dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
dialog-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
dialog_minimal-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
dialog_minimal-1.1r20110118,REV=2011.02.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Also the pkginfo from dialog_minimal is correct:

PKG=CSWdialog-minimal
NAME=dialog_minimal - A script-interpreter which provides a set of curses widget
s (traditional curses version)

If you just do "gmake platforms" you can use the minimal packages just
like I used the others. It builds in like two minutes.

/peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 02:56:38 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:56:38 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Feb 10 17:31:45 -0500 2011:

> it's broken.


>  I could "yell" at you for telling me it was so easy and all I had
> to do was do that make command, when it Doesnt Work Right.

It works just fine for me.  I cannot repeat your results.

> it creates "dialog-minimal", instead of "dialog_minimal".

I get dialog_minimal here.  As did Peter.  Got a shell history for us?

> I'll give you a day to fix it, Ben, if you wish.

There is nothing to fix.  I've just run it several times on both i386
and sparc and it works just fine here.

> so tomorrow I'll redo it my way, if nothing else presents itself.

I'll say it again: Do _not_ clutter the build tree with an alternate
build system for an existing, non-orphaned package.  The existing GAR
recipe works (as verified now by two people).

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 07:56:37 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:56:37 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/11 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
> I'll say it again: Do _not_ clutter the build tree with an alternate
> build system for an existing, non-orphaned package. ?The existing GAR
> recipe works (as verified now by two people).

Three.  I've also tested a number of targets from a clean directory
and I was always getting a correct package.  The standard question:
what revision of gar sources were used?  r13189 was an important
change[1] in the area of dashes vs underscores.

Maciej

[1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/13189

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 08:40:30 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:40:30 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_mechanize
Message-ID: <201102110740.p1B7eU6G012463@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Stateful programmatic web browsing in Python, after Andy Lester's Perl
module.

* py_mechanize: new package
  + py_mechanize-0.2.4,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 09:21:12 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:21:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	("Maciej =?utf-8?Q?Blizi=C5=84ski=22's?= message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011
	06:56:37 +0000")
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>

Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:

> Three.  I've also tested a number of targets from a clean directory
> and I was always getting a correct package.

Here we have 3 persons who spent their time to convince the release
manager to accept the reality of the recipe correctness. More than that
who tried to reason him. This issue is one of those that would be
nonexistent with an automatic release management. The release manager
should be aware that one day his role will be taken up by an automaton
and his attitude is not neutral in that process.
-- 
Peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 14:03:30 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:03:30 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uac e=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297429313-sup-9691@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Maciej Blizi?ski's message of Fri Feb 11 01:56:37 -0500 2011:

Hi Maciej,

> Three.  I've also tested a number of targets from a clean directory
> and I was always getting a correct package.  The standard question:
> what revision of gar sources were used?  r13189 was an important
> change[1] in the area of dashes vs underscores.

Thanks for doing this.  Would you mind inspecting the prototype and
pkginfo files?  Mine look correct, but as per the message I CC'd to
maintainers, Phil is claiming incorrectness (no details yet provided).

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 14:34:39 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:34:39 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <1297429313-sup-9691@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uac e=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297429313-sup-9691@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <1297431223-sup-943@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Fri Feb 11 08:03:30 -0500 2011:
> Excerpts from Maciej Blizi?ski's message of Fri Feb 11 01:56:37 -0500 2011:
> 
> Hi Maciej,
> 
> > Three.  I've also tested a number of targets from a clean directory
> > and I was always getting a correct package.  The standard question:
> > what revision of gar sources were used?  r13189 was an important
> > change[1] in the area of dashes vs underscores.
> 
> Thanks for doing this.  Would you mind inspecting the prototype and
> pkginfo files?  Mine look correct, but as per the message I CC'd to
> maintainers, Phil is claiming incorrectness (no details yet
> provided).

I missed the dialog-minimal in the prototype output.  Dago has
confirmed that this is in fact an outdated GAR issue (eg: if works
with an up-to-date GAR).  I've made the catalog names explicit in
r31253.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 15:53:40 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:53:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libunbound2, unbound, unbound_devel,
	(...)
Message-ID: <201102111453.p1BEred9027284@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Fixing a depency issue.

* unbound: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.02.02
  -   to: 2011.02.11
  + libunbound2-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libunbound2-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_devel-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_devel-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_host-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + unbound_host-1.4.8,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 16:03:08 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?xLBoc2FuIERvxJ9hbg==?=)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:03:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill, libldns1, libldns_devel,
 l(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimPwX8e_UBy9a8JcL53qo740ChTX0aDF4ubeRvu@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102021134.p12BYDg0024335@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimPwX8e_UBy9a8JcL53qo740ChTX0aDF4ubeRvu@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D554FAC.8080207@opencsw.org>

On 02/ 2/11 07:56 PM, Philip Brown wrote:

> packages now batched.
> Assorted renames done.
> (drill ->  ldnsdrill,   ldns ->libldns1, ldns_devel ->  libldns_devel)
> (lot of work, yuck)

I've just noticed, that drill is still in the catalog:
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWdrill/




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 17:34:32 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:34:32 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill, libldns1, libldns_devel,
	l(...)
In-Reply-To: <4D554FAC.8080207@opencsw.org>
References: <201102021134.p12BYDg0024335@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimPwX8e_UBy9a8JcL53qo740ChTX0aDF4ubeRvu@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D554FAC.8080207@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikj88mo8Z5rcXRb7dVMSz_tXSfJy9tW4x3kRu2=@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/11 ?hsan Do?an <ihsan at opencsw.org>:
> On 02/ 2/11 07:56 PM, Philip Brown wrote:
>
>> packages now batched.
>> Assorted renames done.
>> (drill -> ?ldnsdrill, ? ldns ->libldns1, ldns_devel -> ?libldns_devel)
>> (lot of work, yuck)
>
> I've just noticed, that drill is still in the catalog:
> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWdrill/
>

Thank you for noticing that.
(hmm. thought I renamed, so delete wasnt neccessary. sigh. )

now removed.

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 19:33:25 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:33:25 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:
>
>> Three. ?I've also tested a number of targets from a clean directory
>> and I was always getting a correct package.
>
> Here we have 3 persons who spent their time to convince the release
> manager to accept the reality of the recipe correctness. More than that
> who tried to reason him. ....

You seem to be maligning me once again, that I am not accepting
reality or something.

It has now been firmly established that "in reality",  I properly
reported what I was seeing.
(and that there is a loophole or two in GAR that needs to be fixed.
But that's a separate topic).

A multiple of people's opinions, or even their own experiences,
whether 2,3, or 10 people, does not change the "reality" of another
person's experience.

Are you now going to offer me an apology for that, and stop maligning
me, and generally being unreasonably hostile in the future?

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 20:02:58 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:02:58 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> It has now been firmly established that "in reality", ?I properly
> reported what I was seeing.
> (and that there is a loophole or two in GAR that needs to be fixed.
> But that's a separate topic).

That's one way of looking at it, another is that it's common practice
to make sure the local repo is up to date.

/peter

From skayser at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 20:07:54 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:07:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110211190754.GD21610@sebastiankayser.de>

* Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > It has now been firmly established that "in reality", ?I properly
> > reported what I was seeing.
> > (and that there is a loophole or two in GAR that needs to be fixed.
> > But that's a separate topic).
> 
> That's one way of looking at it, another is that it's common practice
> to make sure the local repo is up to date.

In an attempt to direct energy to worthwile efforts:

The underlying issue is a self-enhancing GAR aversion which naturally
undermines the learning effort that would be necessary. If I don't want
to deal with a tool, every minor quirk of it only confirms my aversion.

As this can't be fixed easily, people here might as well turn their
attention to one of the multitude of other issues that are pending.
Fighting this out here is IMHO - at least for now - wasted energy.

Sebastian

P.S.: Thanks for keeping the GAR tree pristine, Ben. Just the other day,
I spoke to a colleague who was rather irritated by the non-GAR builds in
the GAR tree.

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 11 21:43:12 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:43:12 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_mechanize
In-Reply-To: <201102110740.p1B7eU6G012463@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102110740.p1B7eU6G012463@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinMLrNJF21U2-qTs169+F8obQb-K_EbE0JT+w6r@mail.gmail.com>

Looks good. batched.

(odd.. i thought we already had this one. ..
  oh. pm_wwwmechanise.   blah)



On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Stateful programmatic web browsing in Python, after Andy Lester's Perl
> module.
>
> * py_mechanize: new package
> ?+ py_mechanize-0.2.4,REV=2011.02.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 11:32:44 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:32:44 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:33:25 -0800")
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6bp2h7dbn.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Maciej Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:
>>
>>> Three. ?I've also tested a number of targets from a clean directory
>>> and I was always getting a correct package.
>>
>> Here we have 3 persons who spent their time to convince the release
>> manager to accept the reality of the recipe correctness. More than that
>> who tried to reason him. ....
>
> You seem to be maligning me once again, that I am not accepting
> reality or something.

What's wrong with svn update?

> It has now been firmly established that "in reality",  I properly
> reported what I was seeing.
> (and that there is a loophole or two in GAR that needs to be fixed.
> But that's a separate topic).

You have reported an issue which was due to a bad software engineering
practice: i.e. not updating the working copy of a repository.

> A multiple of people's opinions, or even their own experiences,
> whether 2,3, or 10 people, does not change the "reality" of another
> person's experience.

However, they have helped you to perceive the reality.

> Are you now going to offer me an apology for that, and stop maligning
> me, and generally being unreasonably hostile in the future?

What you perceive as hostility is that I don't agree with you. Not
agreeing with you is not hostility. It's the manifestation of a
different vision. A difference of vision on the particular issue of
release management and of community processes issue in general.
-- 
Peter

From yann at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 17:20:50 2011
From: yann at opencsw.org (Yann Rouillard)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:20:50 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
	pm_cyrus
Message-ID: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>

* pm_cyrus: minor version upgrade
   - from: 2.3.16,REV=2010.02.24
   -   to: 2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12
   + pm_cyrus-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + pm_cyrus-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* cyrus_imapd: minor version upgrade
   - from: 2.3.16,REV=2009.12.26
   -   to: 2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12
   + cyrus_imapd-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + cyrus_imapd-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + cyrus_imapd_utils-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + cyrus_imapd_utils-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

--
Generated by submitpkg


From yann at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 18:07:38 2011
From: yann at opencsw.org (Yann Rouillard)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:07:38 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openssl, openssl_devel, openssl_rt,
	o(...)
Message-ID: <4D56BE5A.6090005@opencsw.org>

* openssl: patchlevel upgrade
   - from: 0.9.8q,REV=2010.12.04
   -   to: 0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12
   + openssl-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
   + openssl_devel-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + openssl_devel-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + openssl_rt-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + openssl_rt-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + openssl_utils-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + openssl_utils-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

--
Generated by submitpkg


From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 18:56:03 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:56:03 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openssl, openssl_devel, openssl_rt,
	o(...)
In-Reply-To: <4D56BE5A.6090005@opencsw.org>
References: <4D56BE5A.6090005@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=OHDuCMUhcFzeqCOPdVweFmfhapVC6cGJQz5om@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks. batched


On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Yann Rouillard <yann at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * openssl: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 0.9.8q,REV=2010.12.04
> ?- ? to: 0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12
> ?+ openssl-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openssl_devel-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openssl_devel-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openssl_rt-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openssl_rt-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openssl_utils-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openssl_utils-0.9.8r,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 19:02:26 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:02:26 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
	pm_cyrus
In-Reply-To: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>
References: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimi0f1kvYHJifOjXNXHUcbvUd0=bNFFaMqW_m0V@mail.gmail.com>

So close... but a conflict with the manpage. arrrg.

/opt/csw/share/man/man8/imapd.8

courierimap also has it.


On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Yann Rouillard <yann at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_cyrus: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.3.16,REV=2010.02.24
> ?- ? to: 2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12
> ?+ pm_cyrus-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_cyrus-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * cyrus_imapd: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.3.16,REV=2009.12.26
> ?- ? to: 2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12
> ?+ cyrus_imapd-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ cyrus_imapd-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ cyrus_imapd_utils-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ cyrus_imapd_utils-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 19:05:18 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:05:18 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
	pm_cyrus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimi0f1kvYHJifOjXNXHUcbvUd0=bNFFaMqW_m0V@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimi0f1kvYHJifOjXNXHUcbvUd0=bNFFaMqW_m0V@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=QayWep9st1ofHXL4jaMy5uH8g62-yoh4GbcnQ@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/12 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
> So close... but a conflict with the manpage. arrrg.
>
> /opt/csw/share/man/man8/imapd.8
>
> courierimap also has it.

For the record, checkpkg did catch this issue, but it was overridden
in line 85 of the build file.

https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/cyrus_imapd/trunk/Makefile#L85

From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 19:26:30 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:26:30 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinJtYq2kPaw97sjkd=Br+2-YC0y35ttHbLjARcc@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> It has now been firmly established that "in reality", ?I properly
>> reported what I was seeing.
>> (and that there is a loophole or two in GAR that needs to be fixed.
>> But that's a separate topic).
>
> That's one way of looking at it, another is that it's common practice
> to make sure the local repo is up to date.

I believe it has already been acknowleged by the GAR team, (after
complaints by people other than me about it)
 that having to update your entire repo every time is a "bug", and
that it is supposed to be addressed.

(by having a shared instance of GAR.. ideally as package, installed on
the buildfarm, so everyone is always automatically on the same version
of GAR, if memory serves me correctly)

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 20:01:30 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:01:30 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mailscanner
Message-ID: <201102121901.p1CJ1Udo005631@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* mailscanner: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.81.4.1,REV=2010.09.06
  -   to: 4.82.6.1,REV=2011.02.12
  + mailscanner-4.82.6.1,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 20:42:11 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:42:11 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <201102121901.p1CJ1Udo005631@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102121901.p1CJ1Udo005631@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikegS_imuQ+V-hwHXhbxRbhrBiufAy++xHsgWZA@mail.gmail.com>

Hmmm. theres a boatload of /usr/local refereces Some are potentially
harmless, but some may be more important.

For example,
Sophos.install.solaris

On the one hand, it might not really be neccesary if you provide your
own install script for users.
But if it isnt neccessary, how about just excluding it from the package?

There are also a lot of config files, that you have put into template
style as  xxxxx.CSW
As such, shouldnt you remove or rewrite the /usr/local references in them?

(I do note that you have not made them auto-installed with a class
action script, so maybe it isnt super-critical. But seems like
  it certainly would be more helpful for our users, to not have to do
the most likely search-and-replace themselves?)



On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * mailscanner: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 4.81.4.1,REV=2010.09.06
> ?- ? to: 4.82.6.1,REV=2011.02.12
> ?+ mailscanner-4.82.6.1,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From jcraig at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 21:14:59 2011
From: jcraig at opencsw.org (Jonathan Craig)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:14:59 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJtYq2kPaw97sjkd=Br+2-YC0y35ttHbLjARcc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uace=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinJtYq2kPaw97sjkd=Br+2-YC0y35ttHbLjARcc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimXTqpbxZ-TFPsReEsZc-EfuNKVrMgQTpCXKWim@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> I believe it has already been acknowleged by the GAR team, (after
> complaints by people other than me about it)
> ?that having to update your entire repo every time is a "bug", and
> that it is supposed to be addressed.
>
> (by having a shared instance of GAR.. ideally as package, installed on
> the buildfarm, so everyone is always automatically on the same version
> of GAR, if memory serves me correctly)

Not sure if a common tree is the best answer as it hampers ones
ability to work / test out other recipes while learning.  That aspect
of a private tree has been very helpful to myself as a new maintainer.
 That said, it is easy to forget to update your private copy of gar.
I would think a check during the make process that stops your build
with a message if your using an older revision of gar would be
helpful.  You could then have a variable that allows a maintainer to
proceed in the case where a maintainer intentionally wishes to use an
older rev of gar (ie GAR_SKIP_VERCHK).

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 21:25:56 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:25:56 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikegS_imuQ+V-hwHXhbxRbhrBiufAy++xHsgWZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102121901.p1CJ1Udo005631@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikegS_imuQ+V-hwHXhbxRbhrBiufAy++xHsgWZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=d_JFrSUKm1Sw5eEfGEyMCgiK5oqH7D8ccFUMv@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hmmm. theres a boatload of /usr/local refereces Some are potentially
> harmless, but some may be more important.
>
> For example,
> Sophos.install.solaris
>
> On the one hand, it might not really be neccesary if you provide your
> own install script for users.
> But if it isnt neccessary, how about just excluding it from the package?
>
> There are also a lot of config files, that you have put into template
> style as ?xxxxx.CSW
> As such, shouldnt you remove or rewrite the /usr/local references in them?
>
> (I do note that you have not made them auto-installed with a class
> action script, so maybe it isnt super-critical. But seems like
> ?it certainly would be more helpful for our users, to not have to do
> the most likely search-and-replace themselves?)

I've made sure over several years that this package installs smoothly
with out other related software like perl, spamassassin, dcc and
clamav, all paths use /opt/csw paths by default. The /usr/local
references are harmless since they refer to commercial software we
will never carry and that actually install in that path since the
authors of MailScanner have chosen default paths that actually match
default paths for that scanner.

Changing or removing those paths/files that have those paths would
make the package considerably worse for users who opt for one or more
commercial scanners to complement ClamAV which is very common.

/peter

From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 12 22:42:57 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:42:57 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mailscanner
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=d_JFrSUKm1Sw5eEfGEyMCgiK5oqH7D8ccFUMv@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102121901.p1CJ1Udo005631@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikegS_imuQ+V-hwHXhbxRbhrBiufAy++xHsgWZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=d_JFrSUKm1Sw5eEfGEyMCgiK5oqH7D8ccFUMv@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinys0mEKRJ_S6vxhhQeAzRJEoeu0O7utg5DXppQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> I've made sure over several years that this package installs smoothly
> with out other related software like perl, spamassassin, dcc and
> clamav, all paths use /opt/csw paths by default. The /usr/local
> references are harmless since they refer to commercial software we
> will never carry and that actually install in that path since the
> authors of MailScanner have chosen default paths that actually match
> default paths for that scanner.


Ah, that makes sense. thanks for the details.
Would be nice if you put that information about the /usr/local paths
in "i cswreleasemgr" as a reminder for next time.

meanwhile, package is batched.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sun Feb 13 01:44:37 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:44:37 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pkgutil, pkgutilplus
Message-ID: <201102130044.p1D0ibIF018288@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pkgutil: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.2,REV=2010.10.21
  -   to: 2.3,REV=2011.02.12
  + pkgutil-2.3,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pkgutil-2.3,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pkgutilplus-2.3,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Feb 13 01:58:29 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:58:29 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimXTqpbxZ-TFPsReEsZc-EfuNKVrMgQTpCXKWim@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031810.p13IAcBV011511@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinBe1RafEq41X=x=0_pbfPJ3-ihJdxzhp_bizbF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHqF5OhiiThf1aDH+arKSKz-geNnf6HtMHRziD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ni2GSs44F0SG9zgywD0Vd-o1LWtoVUzju7o7d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110204091155.GN21610@sebastiankayser.de>
	<AANLkTi=zeX3ocTj4G17REfjbbL_UyfR1FPGn+87U80NV@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6bp2qq1x2.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinfxA=mhKVMw1bKt6NdROv+ScyWo8bSsog+Sw1R@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6tyginznl.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=FEA5M9ZuyvMqK5Fpt+sMbOL9Gd7EgsbuPkmoT@mail.gmail.com>
	<x67hddnzh7.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1297128458-sup-2208@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkha7pYOewjRSEw0nPORdp12ctbwmUnAAgQR-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297216570-sup-8578@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=xMgbXNMW99iWGOfpdCEg5S6pHDTnLcUc7FwmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297354612-sup-767@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTi=wUUeJzidWfAN3tU=tc2qZZfZmYx740drNaPft@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297389395-sup-4648@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimYf=pmAT8XY70TiZ+d6Uac
	e=srwpwgt4NXavSz@mail.gmail.com> <x6k4h7gex3.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=1OEWnK_uvPfLhnbfD+xSwsGqTa+s==9LH6NHe@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFBpex37HafvFEEuQOEivTumK1VuOZcGPNTpOF@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinJtYq2kPaw97sjkd=Br+2-YC0y35ttHbLjARcc@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimXTqpbxZ-TFPsReEsZc-EfuNKVrMgQTpCXKWim@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297558049-sup-2885@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Jonathan Craig's message of Sat Feb 12 15:14:59 -0500 2011:

Hi Jonathan,

> > (by having a shared instance of GAR.. ideally as package, installed on
> > the buildfarm, so everyone is always automatically on the same version
> > of GAR, if memory serves me correctly)
> 
> Not sure if a common tree is the best answer as it hampers ones
> ability to work / test out other recipes while learning.  That aspect
> of a private tree has been very helpful to myself as a new
> maintainer.

In past discussions, we've talked about making just the GAR code a
standalone, shared entity, delivered as a package.  The build recipes
would still be private to your own checkout.

I still think this is ultimately a good idea, but there are things
that have prevented anyone from tackling it.  Not the least of these
is the frequency of the updates to GAR[1].  It's constantly being
improved in various ways and that would leave to a pile of updates on
the build boxes.

Sebastian's new tool 'mgar' in conjunction with a per-machine shared
checkout of gar/v2 may be a good compromise.  I think he's planning to
demo it at the camp next week and maybe expose it to wider use after
that.  Several of us have been using it with good results so
far...things may be looking up in this regard.  (I hope I'm not
putting you on the spot Sebastian!)

>  That said, it is easy to forget to update your private copy of gar.
> I would think a check during the make process that stops your build
> with a message if your using an older revision of gar would be
> helpful.  You could then have a variable that allows a maintainer to
> proceed in the case where a maintainer intentionally wishes to use
> an older rev of gar (ie GAR_SKIP_VERCHK).

Anything that incurs a subversion round trip to sourceforge every time
a gmake target (or at least once per 'spotless') is triggered would
quickly drive me to set that variable.  Subversion is just to slow to
inline that process in my opinion.  If we were working with a faster
tool or more local network, this would be more viable.

Ultimately, we're just in the habit of frequently updating our trees.
Mostly, you can get away with not doing this frequently, Phil just got
behind an actual bug in this particular instance.

It would be nice to have a shared GAR instance

Thanks
-Ben

[1] I seem to recall this being considered a flaw, but I see it as a
    boon...we're actively improving the tool on a regular basis.
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Feb 13 03:10:14 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 03:10:14 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_zope_interface
Message-ID: <201102130210.p1D2AEE4027843@login.bo.opencsw.org>

A Python implementation of object interfaces.

Needed by buildbot as dependency.

* py_zope_interface: new package
  + py_zope_interface-3.6.1,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_zope_interface-3.6.1,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 19:57:47 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:57:47 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_rpcxml
Message-ID: <201102131857.p1DIvlkm008685@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_rpcxml: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.65,REV=2009.06.28
  -   to: 0.74,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_rpcxml-0.74,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 20:09:33 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:09:33 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_pathclass
Message-ID: <201102131909.p1DJ9XMw018072@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_pathclass: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.17,REV=2009.06.28
  -   to: 0.23,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_pathclass-0.23,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 20:14:18 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:14:18 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_objaccessor
Message-ID: <201102131914.p1DJEIJG023860@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_objaccessor: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.36,REV=2011.01.07
  -   to: 0.38,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_objaccessor-0.38,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 20:26:23 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:26:23 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_glib
Message-ID: <201102131926.p1DJQNnS003728@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_glib: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.222,REV=2010.01.31
  -   to: 1.223,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_glib-1.223,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_glib-1.223,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 20:38:02 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:38:02 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_fcgi
Message-ID: <201102131938.p1DJc2Le017177@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_fcgi: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.68,REV=2010.01.31
  -   to: 0.69,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_fcgi-0.69,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_fcgi-0.69,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 20:52:47 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:52:47 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_extutilsdepends
Message-ID: <201102131952.p1DJqliA028078@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_extutilsdepends: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.302,REV=2009.07.07
  -   to: 0.304,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_extutilsdepends-0.304,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 21:00:16 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:00:16 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_fcgi
Message-ID: <201102132000.p1DK0Ga8008954@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_fcgi: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.68,REV=2010.01.31
  -   to: 0.71,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_fcgi-0.71,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_fcgi-0.71,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 21:02:22 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:02:22 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_fcgi
In-Reply-To: <201102131938.p1DJc2Le017177@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102131938.p1DJc2Le017177@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4D5838CE.7050507@wbonnet.net>

Hi

Please ignore version 0.69. Version 0.71 is available and submitted.

Version 0.69 was not latest. The CPAN maintainer has changed, and 0.69 
was the latest from previous maintainer...

cheers
W.

> * pm_fcgi: minor version upgrade
>    - from: 0.68,REV=2010.01.31
>    -   to: 0.69,REV=2011.02.13
>    + pm_fcgi-0.69,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>    + pm_fcgi-0.69,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>


-- 
William                     http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.opencsw.org      Community SoftWare for Solaris


From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org  Sat Feb 12 17:19:51 2011
From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:19:51 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
	pm_cyrus
Message-ID: <4D56B327.6060904@pleiades.fr.eu.org>

* pm_cyrus: minor version upgrade
   - from: 2.3.16,REV=2010.02.24
   -   to: 2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12
   + pm_cyrus-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + pm_cyrus-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* cyrus_imapd: minor version upgrade
   - from: 2.3.16,REV=2009.12.26
   -   to: 2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12
   + cyrus_imapd-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + cyrus_imapd-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + cyrus_imapd_utils-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   + cyrus_imapd_utils-2.4.6,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

--
Generated by submitpkg


From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 22:24:38 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:24:38 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xmlnssupp
Message-ID: <201102132124.p1DLOc6L028823@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Upgrade and takeover from Alex Moore

* pm_xmlnssupp: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.10,REV=2010.03.04
  -   to: 1.11,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_xmlnssupp-1.11,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 22:44:28 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:44:28 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_tstmanif
Message-ID: <201102132144.p1DLiSMQ016100@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_tstmanif: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.22,REV=2008.03.02
  -   to: 1.23,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_tstmanif-1.23,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 23:05:14 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:05:14 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_txtquoted
Message-ID: <201102132205.p1DM5E1E010769@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_txtquoted: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.05,REV=2008.01.25
  -   to: 2.06,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_txtquoted-2.06,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 23:12:09 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:12:09 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_treesimple
Message-ID: <201102132212.p1DMC9ok017037@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Takeover from Alex Moore. Package is now build from GAR

* pm_treesimple: revision upgrade
  - from: 2008.03.02
  -   to: 2011.02.13
  + pm_treesimple-1.18,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 23:28:16 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:28:16 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_textwrap, pm_textwrapper
Message-ID: <201102132228.p1DMSGZ9027408@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_textwrap: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.01,REV=2008.03.02
  -   to: 1.02,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_textwrap-1.02,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_textwrapper: new package
  + pm_textwrapper-1.02,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 23:34:53 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:34:53 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_textwikifmt, pm_textwikiformat
Message-ID: <201102132234.p1DMYr7i001829@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_textwikifmt: revision upgrade
  - from: 2008.03.02
  -   to: 2011.02.13
  + pm_textwikifmt-0.79,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_textwikiformat: new package
  + pm_textwikiformat-0.79,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 23:41:01 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:41:01 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_textglob
Message-ID: <201102132241.p1DMf1gp007527@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Takeover from Alex Moore

There is a problem with the version from our catalog. Version 0.09 does not exist in CPAN. The latest is 0.08

* pm_textglob: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.09,REV=2008.02.14
  -   to: 0.08,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_textglob-0.08,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 13 23:54:45 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:54:45 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_testinline
Message-ID: <201102132254.p1DMsjo6018372@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_testinline: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.208,REV=2008.02.01
  -   to: 2.212,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_testinline-2.212,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Mon Feb 14 00:04:26 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:04:26 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_regexpcom, pm_regexpcommon
Message-ID: <201102132304.p1DN4Qqr024859@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_regexpcommon: new package
  + pm_regexpcommon-2010010201,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_regexpcom: major version upgrade
  - from: 2.120
  -   to: 2010010201,REV=2011.02.13
  + pm_regexpcom-2010010201,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Mon Feb 14 00:11:31 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:11:31 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_pardist
Message-ID: <201102132311.p1DNBVn7004808@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_pardist: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.29,REV=2008.03.02
  -   to: 0.47,REV=2011.02.14
  + pm_pardist-0.47,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Mon Feb 14 00:20:12 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:20:12 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netdnsreslvprg
Message-ID: <201102132320.p1DNKCKa013968@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_netdnsreslvprg: major version upgrade
  - from: 0.003,REV=2008.03.01
  -   to: v0.003,REV=2011.02.14
  + pm_netdnsreslvprg-v0.003,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From jcraig at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 14 04:25:07 2011
From: jcraig at opencsw.org (Jonathan Craig)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:25:07 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ntop
Message-ID: <201102140325.p1E3P7Hs010645@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* ntop: major version upgrade
  - from: 3.0
  -   to: 4.0.3,REV=2011.02.13
  + ntop-4.0.3,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ntop-4.0.3,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 14 10:43:20 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:43:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <98512968-CFB4-4D4F-A192-1A409CD77BF6@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 04.02.2011 um 20:15 schrieb Philip Brown:
> I just noticed you have
> /etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-system.example
> /etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-user.example
> (no class usage at all)
> 
> How about moving them to /opt/csw/share/doc/msmtp ?

I updated the system-wide to use preserveconf and the local one
to be located in doc/.

Best regards

  -- Dago

* msmtp: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.22,REV=2011.01.04
  -   to: 1.4.23,REV=2011.02.14
  + msmtp-1.4.23,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + msmtp-1.4.23,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz



From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 14 20:16:23 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:16:23 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6484A46E-D777-47EF-8C77-8556CE7479D9@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 04.02.2011 um 02:09 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?
>> 
>> This fixes #4664:
>>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664
>> 
> 
> aha.
> 
> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?

Updated packages delivered including README.CSW and new naming standard:

rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

  -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 14 20:28:19 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:28:19 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
Message-ID: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pixman: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
  -   to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
  + pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* libpixman: new package
  + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 14 20:29:33 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:29:33 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnutls, gnutls_devel, libgnutls13,
	li(...)
Message-ID: <201102141929.p1EJTX6A029733@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* gnutls: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.8.6,REV=2010.03.15
  -   to: 2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18
  + gnutls-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gnutls-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gnutls_devel-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* libgnutls: new package
  + libgnutls26-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgnutls26-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgnutls_dev-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgnutls_dev-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libgnutls13: new package
  + libgnutls13-2.0.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgnutls13-2.0.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:00:08 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:00:08 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netdnsreslvprg, et. al
Message-ID: <AANLkTimxtTXF3ioYgN0ZCkbn1rsG97CGxL0fdsrcrHq9@mail.gmail.com>

GadZOOKS, that was a lot of packages! :-}

erm.. I think I got em all.



On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:20 PM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> * pm_netdnsreslvprg: major version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.003,REV=2008.03.01
> ?- ? to: v0.003,REV=2011.02.14
> ?+ pm_netdnsreslvprg-v0.003,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:01:27 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:01:27 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pkgutil, pkgutilplus
In-Reply-To: <201102130044.p1D0ibIF018288@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102130044.p1D0ibIF018288@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDtTMaNsguoXBAVc+sRVFjcA3kb92c2KNc9qHN@mail.gmail.com>

/usr/local string detected, as obviously harmless, so ignored.

packages batched.



On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pkgutil: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.2,REV=2010.10.21
> ?- ? to: 2.3,REV=2011.02.12
> ?+ pkgutil-2.3,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pkgutil-2.3,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pkgutilplus-2.3,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:12:56 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:12:56 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ntop
In-Reply-To: <201102140325.p1E3P7Hs010645@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102140325.p1E3P7Hs010645@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBzK-3jupWvGNuRxGagr1t3RRD80kArTZtUDbi@mail.gmail.com>

Hurray!

oh. arg. there are a metric ton of /usr/local references.
Happily though, they are almost all in the "faq" doc file, which is
fairly clear about mentioning that /usr/local is only used by way of
example.
So I gues it can pass through.


On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Jonathan Craig <jcraig at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * ntop: major version upgrade
> ?- from: 3.0
> ?- ? to: 4.0.3,REV=2011.02.13
> ?+ ntop-4.0.3,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ntop-4.0.3,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:23:58 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:23:58 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <98512968-CFB4-4D4F-A192-1A409CD77BF6@opencsw.org>
References: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>
	<98512968-CFB4-4D4F-A192-1A409CD77BF6@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLv_=6LMKzSYX+zfkDW=d6LGQJL_54Ogg7T4y=@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 04.02.2011 um 20:15 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> I just noticed you have
>> /etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-system.example
>> /etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-user.example
>> (no class usage at all)
>>
>> How about moving them to /opt/csw/share/doc/msmtp ?
>
> I updated the system-wide to use preserveconf and the local one
> to be located in doc/.


well, that's an improvement at least. thanks.

Is there a reason why you didnt want to use cswcptemplate?
and/or copy the systemwide initial one into doc as well?

If its just "gar doesnt support it"... you may recall that the only
reason it doesnt, is because I dont understand how to add gar suport
for it. I tried.. i couldnt figure it out. You would understand how to
make gar support it better than I

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:26:12 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:26:12 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_zope_interface
In-Reply-To: <201102130210.p1D2AEE4027843@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102130210.p1D2AEE4027843@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik4akuD-bS91u7nBPaKYJ7=iQFu5NB452uPX0A9@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> A Python implementation of object interfaces.
>
> Needed by buildbot as dependency.
>
> * py_zope_interface: new package
> ?+ py_zope_interface-3.6.1,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ py_zope_interface-3.6.1,REV=2011.02.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:27:03 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:27:03 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <6484A46E-D777-47EF-8C77-8556CE7479D9@opencsw.org>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<6484A46E-D777-47EF-8C77-8556CE7479D9@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTint2fCX28CLEG6MnSG5S0SzACYbSWn2tYovjf78@mail.gmail.com>

on hold, as requested by William (beause of "p'")

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 04.02.2011 um 02:09 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Am 03.02.2011 um 22:27 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>> Errr.. what's the reason for this repackaging and takeover? Same src version...?
>>>
>>> This fixes #4664:
>>> ?https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4664
>>>
>>
>> aha.
>>
>> shouldnt you changed the rev to 1.6.0patched or something like that then?
>
> Updated packages delivered including README.CSW and new naming standard:
>
> rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> Best regards
>
> ?-- Dago
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:31:26 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:31:26 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinvZ_7jevjw8k3qcB9m1Xn1Gq2Ez9kugjQRubLR@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pixman: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
> ?- ? to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
> ?+ pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libpixman: new package
> ?+ libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:34:23 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:34:23 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnutls, gnutls_devel, libgnutls13,
	li(...)
In-Reply-To: <201102141929.p1EJTX6A029733@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102141929.p1EJTX6A029733@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTFMUpUynmE228A=fTehvKaWfEXEbRYwT1rvNP@mail.gmail.com>

You're mixing and matching _dev and _devel randomly. This is messy.

I also did not see any reply to my earlier requests, asking when we
have had any kind of officially agreement to migrate from _devel to
_dev

Yes, there has been some interest expressed in _dev. But there has
been no formal vote or agreement on it yet, and our defacto standard
at the moment, is still _devel.



On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * gnutls: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.8.6,REV=2010.03.15
> ?- ? to: 2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18
> ?+ gnutls-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gnutls-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gnutls_devel-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libgnutls: new package
> ?+ libgnutls26-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgnutls26-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgnutls_dev-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgnutls_dev-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libgnutls13: new package
> ?+ libgnutls13-2.0.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgnutls13-2.0.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 01:35:19 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:35:19 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinvZ_7jevjw8k3qcB9m1Xn1Gq2Ez9kugjQRubLR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinvZ_7jevjw8k3qcB9m1Xn1Gq2Ez9kugjQRubLR@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=BOVOHzW3AULB2=LHUFJYJyk4curCftPT9nfoF@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> batched
>

drat. pulled from batch.
I didnt initially notice this was using _dev instead of _devel.



> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * pixman: minor version upgrade
>> ?- from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
>> ?- ? to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
>> ?+ pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * libpixman: new package
>> ?+ libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 02:08:24 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:08:24 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLv_=6LMKzSYX+zfkDW=d6LGQJL_54Ogg7T4y=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>
	<98512968-CFB4-4D4F-A192-1A409CD77BF6@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimLv_=6LMKzSYX+zfkDW=d6LGQJL_54Ogg7T4y=@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1297732050-sup-8702@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Feb 14 19:23:58 -0500 2011:

> If its just "gar doesnt support it"... you may recall that the only
> reason it doesnt, is because I dont understand how to add gar suport
> for it. I tried.. i couldnt figure it out. You would understand how
> to make gar support it better than I

I'm mucking about in GAR to work on the 'i cswreleasenotes' stuff, so
I'll try to add this support tonight as well.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 09:19:18 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:19:18 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnutls, gnutls_devel, libgnutls13,
	li(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTFMUpUynmE228A=fTehvKaWfEXEbRYwT1rvNP@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102141929.p1EJTX6A029733@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinTFMUpUynmE228A=fTehvKaWfEXEbRYwT1rvNP@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2D0DA461-B51D-4B8B-A2FE-B82774BF65EC@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 15.02.2011 um 01:34 schrieb Philip Brown:
> You're mixing and matching _dev and _devel randomly. This is messy.

Nope, for some packages which are simple respins I just kept the
existing -devel while for a full rework I'll change to -dev.
The -devel here is an empty transitional which depends on -dev.


Best regards

  -- Dago

> 
> I also did not see any reply to my earlier requests, asking when we
> have had any kind of officially agreement to migrate from _devel to
> _dev
> 
> Yes, there has been some interest expressed in _dev. But there has
> been no formal vote or agreement on it yet, and our defacto standard
> at the moment, is still _devel.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * gnutls: minor version upgrade
>>  - from: 2.8.6,REV=2010.03.15
>>  -   to: 2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18
>>  + gnutls-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + gnutls-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + gnutls_devel-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> * libgnutls: new package
>>  + libgnutls26-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libgnutls26-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libgnutls_dev-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libgnutls_dev-2.10.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> * libgnutls13: new package
>>  + libgnutls13-2.0.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libgnutls13-2.0.4,REV=2011.01.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 13:44:22 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:44:22 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 10.02.2011 um 18:38 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 23:54:07 -0500 2011:
>> 
>>> Hrrr... it would have been nice if whoever put that in there, put in
>>> a comment to say *why* they put that in there :( Any guesses? would
>>> be nice to know if its still needed.
>> 
>> The svn log might be of use for this?  Checkpkg is good at catching
>> this error in both directions, so if it's not complaining right now,
>> the override should be removed.
> 
> makes sense to me.
> But waiting on a response from "the maintainer".

Ping? I just got a request on #opencsw that a user is waiting on this update :-)


Best regards

  -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 15:28:42 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:28:42 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cvs, cvs_feature
Message-ID: <201102151428.p1FESge9007647@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This adds a patch to allow extssh again which was in the previous cvs but
was missed during garification. A user is waiting for release.

* cvs: revision number added upgrade
  - from: 
  -   to: ('p',)
  + cvs-1.12.13,p,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cvs-1.12.13,p,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cvs_feature-1.12.13,p,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 16:11:20 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:11:20 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libebml, libebml3, libebml_dev,
	libma(...)
Message-ID: <201102151511.p1FFBKjB008472@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Please make sure to release all or nothing as the previous libebml contained no
SONAME, so the only dependency libmatroska needs to be released at the same time.

Best regards

  -- Dago

* libmatroska: new package
  + libmatroska3-1.1.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libmatroska3-1.1.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libmatroska_dev-1.1.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libmatroska_dev-1.1.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libebml: major version upgrade
  - from: 0.7.8,REV=2009.10.08
  -   to: 1.2.0,REV=2011.02.15
  + libebml-1.2.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* libebml: new package
  + libebml3-1.2.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libebml3-1.2.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libebml_dev-1.2.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libebml_dev-1.2.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* libmatroska: major version upgrade
  - from: 0.8.1,REV=2009.10.08
  -   to: 1.1.0,REV=2011.02.15
  + libmatroska-1.1.0,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 18:25:19 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:25:19 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cvs, cvs_feature
In-Reply-To: <201102151428.p1FESge9007647@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102151428.p1FESge9007647@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ZKkbrvEk-B-PW_FVShfu4v7oUeZXFVpW3SE30@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This adds a patch to allow extssh again which was in the previous cvs but
> was missed during garification. A user is waiting for release.
>
> * cvs: revision number added upgrade
> ?- from:
> ?- ? to: ('p',)
> ?+ cvs-1.12.13,p,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ cvs-1.12.13,p,REV=2011.02.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz


again -- holding off on this, by request of William, because of the 'p' thing.

From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org  Mon Feb 14 20:59:06 2011
From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:59:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
 pm_cyrus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=QayWep9st1ofHXL4jaMy5uH8g62-yoh4GbcnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>	<AANLkTimi0f1kvYHJifOjXNXHUcbvUd0=bNFFaMqW_m0V@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=QayWep9st1ofHXL4jaMy5uH8g62-yoh4GbcnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D59898A.4060808@pleiades.fr.eu.org>

Yes, I didn't know it was yet mandatory and I postponed the resolution 
of this conflict (which is there since the beginning).

What is the usual or recommanded way to fix this ?
I would prefer if possible to avoid renaming the binary, I already did 
it for some tools and the master process but I don't like to introduce 
too many differences with upstream.

Yann

Le 12/02/2011 19:05, Maciej Blizi?ski a ?crit :
> 2011/2/12 Philip Brown<phil at opencsw.org>:
>    
>> So close... but a conflict with the manpage. arrrg.
>>
>> /opt/csw/share/man/man8/imapd.8
>>
>> courierimap also has it.
>>      
> For the record, checkpkg did catch this issue, but it was overridden
> in line 85 of the build file.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/cyrus_imapd/trunk/Makefile#L85
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>    


From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 23:36:45 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:36:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
	pm_cyrus
In-Reply-To: <4D59898A.4060808@pleiades.fr.eu.org>
References: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimi0f1kvYHJifOjXNXHUcbvUd0=bNFFaMqW_m0V@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=QayWep9st1ofHXL4jaMy5uH8g62-yoh4GbcnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D59898A.4060808@pleiades.fr.eu.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikc82xYWH-ZFE9sYZHhOvedvRAbDTY+yJrJtyTJ@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/14 Yann Rouillard <yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org>:
> Yes, I didn't know it was yet mandatory and I postponed the resolution of
> this conflict (which is there since the beginning).
>
> What is the usual or recommanded way to fix this ?
> I would prefer if possible to avoid renaming the binary, I already did it
> for some tools and the master process but I don't like to introduce too many
> differences with upstream.
>

There's only one way: either cyrus, or courier, has to either rename, or move.

Oh wait.. there's ANOTHER imapd. sigh.
CSWimap, which is the "UW" imapd.

Our search page says:

/opt/csw/bin/imapd
/opt/csw/libexec/cyrus/imapd
/opt/csw/sbin/imapd

Yuck!!!

I think we probably should move the non-cyrus ones to
/opt/csw/libexec/[prog]/imapd.
That's a nice standard.

Then there's the issue of what we do about man-pages.
That one's stickier.
Maybe rename each to be  [prog]_imapd.8  ?

eg: cyrus_imapd.8 ?

It's an interesting point, that you didnt, strictly speaking, rename
the binary. you only "moved" it.
It would technically be a little cleaner, if you did truely "rename"
it, so we had

/opt/csw/sbin/[prog]_imapd

then we could have the manpages match the program name.
That would take cooperation between all the maintainers.

Who are:

You
[Retired], for courier imap
[Different-retired], for UW imap.

drat. that makes things more challenging.
We might best bring this up on the main mailing list.

From william at wbonnet.net  Tue Feb 15 23:48:17 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:48:17 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cvs, cvs_feature
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ZKkbrvEk-B-PW_FVShfu4v7oUeZXFVpW3SE30@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102151428.p1FESge9007647@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=ZKkbrvEk-B-PW_FVShfu4v7oUeZXFVpW3SE30@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D5B02B1.9040804@wbonnet.net>

Hi Philip
>
> again -- holding off on this, by request of William, because of the 'p' thing.
I have patched statistics tools and uwatch. You can move forward please.

cheers
W.

> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


-- 
William                     http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.opencsw.org      Community SoftWare for Solaris


From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 23:55:34 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:55:34 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cvs, cvs_feature
In-Reply-To: <4D5B02B1.9040804@wbonnet.net>
References: <201102151428.p1FESge9007647@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=ZKkbrvEk-B-PW_FVShfu4v7oUeZXFVpW3SE30@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D5B02B1.9040804@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikFuiYyxCgBQOi2_kaPSj_-B-+BR=JZsv8fKNaK@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks. batched


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> Hi Philip
>>
>> again -- holding off on this, by request of William, because of the 'p'
>> thing.
>
> I have patched statistics tools and uwatch. You can move forward please.
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Feb 15 23:56:00 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:56:00 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTint2fCX28CLEG6MnSG5S0SzACYbSWn2tYovjf78@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102031642.p13GgSkJ021403@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=-Whhbp21gqzV+MQQ1-t63mWH3qz4Ba4_93T0Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<00D243A4-2C18-4F39-9F9E-FA5D4AC18DD2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikqHWVY+Rk3B0R2cTTxCLwYVYPm88t8S5RtnP8E@mail.gmail.com>
	<6484A46E-D777-47EF-8C77-8556CE7479D9@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTint2fCX28CLEG6MnSG5S0SzACYbSWn2tYovjf78@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTqHiNj1vuXZRqa9H35mGJBT3d5O4e+G-Y9oNy@mail.gmail.com>

batching now.



On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> on hold, as requested by William (beause of "p'")
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 05:13:48 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:13:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cas_etcservices
Message-ID: <201102160413.p1G4DmUI016176@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This now uses /usr/bin/grep instead of /usr/xpg4/bin/grep to work around
the fact that the xpg4 may not always be there.

* cas_etcservices: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.11.26
  -   to: 2011.02.16
  + cas_etcservices-1.42,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 11:06:57 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:06:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 14.02.2011 um 20:28 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> * pixman: minor version upgrade
>  - from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
>  -   to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
>  + pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> * libpixman: new package
>  + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

I noticed you released pixman and libpixman1, but not libpixman_dev. This is
not good. Please either roll back the change completely or release libpixman_dev.
I recommend handling all packages on one email as unseparable unit.


Best regards

  -- Dago


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 14:56:08 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:56:08 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1297864538-sup-3297@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Wed Feb 16 05:06:57 -0500 2011:

> I recommend handling all packages on one email as unseparable unit.

+1.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 14:59:44 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:59:44 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncftp
Message-ID: <201102161359.p1GDxiIt004374@login.bo.opencsw.org>

All /usr/local references have been verified.

* ncftp: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08
  -   to: 3.2.5,REV=2011.02.16
  + ncftp-3.2.5,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ncftp-3.2.5,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 15:04:26 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:04:26 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLv_=6LMKzSYX+zfkDW=d6LGQJL_54Ogg7T4y=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>
	<98512968-CFB4-4D4F-A192-1A409CD77BF6@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimLv_=6LMKzSYX+zfkDW=d6LGQJL_54Ogg7T4y=@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <F3FCB6DB-1473-4026-BF00-EED3C2906064@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 15.02.2011 um 01:23 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Am 04.02.2011 um 20:15 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> I just noticed you have
>>> /etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-system.example
>>> /etc/opt/csw/msmtprc-user.example
>>> (no class usage at all)
>>> 
>>> How about moving them to /opt/csw/share/doc/msmtp ?
>> 
>> I updated the system-wide to use preserveconf and the local one
>> to be located in doc/.
> 
> well, that's an improvement at least. thanks.
> 
> Is there a reason why you didnt want to use cswcptemplate?

Umh, no. Is this generally preferred? Should we deprecate cswsampleconf
and cswpreserveconf then in favor of cswcptemplate?

> and/or copy the systemwide initial one into doc as well?

Why? We never put .CSW configuration files additionally in doc in
the past.


Best regards

  -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 16:48:54 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:48:54 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
Message-ID: <201102161548.p1GFms6J018410@login.bo.opencsw.org>

The previous batch had i386 for some strange reason in the sparc package. please repush.

* rdesktop: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.02.14
  -   to: 2011.02.16
  + rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 19:20:58 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:20:58 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cyrus_imapd, cyrus_imapd_utils,
	pm_cyrus
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikc82xYWH-ZFE9sYZHhOvedvRAbDTY+yJrJtyTJ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D56B362.8010504@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimi0f1kvYHJifOjXNXHUcbvUd0=bNFFaMqW_m0V@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=QayWep9st1ofHXL4jaMy5uH8g62-yoh4GbcnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D59898A.4060808@pleiades.fr.eu.org>
	<AANLkTikc82xYWH-ZFE9sYZHhOvedvRAbDTY+yJrJtyTJ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinb3KAAdVU9RUyk2VP5QHBhCdLoZgFAAHW1JoKt@mail.gmail.com>

Good news Yann.. I just came up with another idea.

I just noticed that in your package, you already have

/opt/csw/share/doc/cyrus_imapd/man


if you just move your imapd.8 from /opt/csw/share/man to there, then I
think the package can be accepted with no further changes required.

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 19:28:08 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:28:08 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncftp
In-Reply-To: <201102161359.p1GDxiIt004374@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102161359.p1GDxiIt004374@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinOAgdTin4StBXEu25MUAT57mmkGVRn0JKWnzQA@mail.gmail.com>

thanhks. batching


On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> All /usr/local references have been verified.
>
> * ncftp: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08
> ?- ? to: 3.2.5,REV=2011.02.16
> ?+ ncftp-3.2.5,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ncftp-3.2.5,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 21:45:51 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:45:51 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <F3FCB6DB-1473-4026-BF00-EED3C2906064@opencsw.org>
References: <201102041222.p14CMKmh009142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikX29cGRUKJ7VyUnsmmV6Khoch0s+uBkQvzD8LS@mail.gmail.com>
	<98512968-CFB4-4D4F-A192-1A409CD77BF6@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimLv_=6LMKzSYX+zfkDW=d6LGQJL_54Ogg7T4y=@mail.gmail.com>
	<F3FCB6DB-1473-4026-BF00-EED3C2906064@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinezBNxXcEbVqx48wtZCS=H0H4KTmM25sh3nLWM@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,

*wave*


>> Is there a reason why you didnt want to use cswcptemplate?
>
> Umh, no. Is this generally preferred? Should we deprecate cswsampleconf
> and cswpreserveconf then in favor of cswcptemplate?
>

When the goal is "deliver a file to /etc/opt/csw based on a template",
then yes I think we should.
As I recall, the conversation on the maintainers list was generally
convergent on,
[sounds like a good idea, let us know when the thing is fully implemented].
Well, it is fully implemented now.


>> and/or copy the systemwide initial one into doc as well?
>
> Why? We never put .CSW configuration files additionally in doc in
> the past.

That was just a workaround to "put something under /opt/csw",if you
didnt feel like using cswcptemplate for some reason.

The good news is, Ben made it really trivial to pick up use of the
template stuff through gar now. You just deploy the file to the
appropriate directory under /opt/csw/etc/templates(?), and the class
gets auto-triggered.
details areon the wiki page for class actions.

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Feb 16 21:46:48 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:46:48 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rdesktop
In-Reply-To: <201102161548.p1GFms6J018410@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102161548.p1GFms6J018410@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikEs3Eu-hwi2fuGWRNb-5hWbNNx-xrPWcQL3YNV@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> The previous batch had i386 for some strange reason in the sparc package. please repush.
>
> * rdesktop: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2011.02.14
> ?- ? to: 2011.02.16
> ?+ rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ rdesktop-1.6.0,p,REV=2011.02.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 21:48:37 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:48:37 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTincZqC9wptKM-fqZoU=YpT+yncqgHV19i0H+N+Y@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 14.02.2011 um 20:28 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
>> * pixman: minor version upgrade
>> ?- from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
>> ?- ? to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
>> ?+ pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * libpixman: new package
>> ?+ libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> I noticed you released pixman and libpixman1, but not libpixman_dev. This is
> not good. Please either roll back the change completely or release libpixman_dev.
> I recommend handling all packages on one email as unseparable unit.
>
>

okiedokie that's fine.
rollback in process.

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 21:55:52 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:55:52 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cas_etcservices
In-Reply-To: <201102160413.p1G4DmUI016176@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102160413.p1G4DmUI016176@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinaEy5sZ-an98KMN=sbZDoAe_7x=94RRg2wkBnV@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This now uses /usr/bin/grep instead of /usr/xpg4/bin/grep to work around
> the fact that the xpg4 may not always be there.
>

okay. batching.

out of curiosity, I find it puzzling why you give full paths for
/usr/bin/cp, /usr/bin/grep,but not for awk.

Probably, full paths arent really neccesary for any of them.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 16 22:28:21 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:28:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cas_etcservices
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinaEy5sZ-an98KMN=sbZDoAe_7x=94RRg2wkBnV@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102160413.p1G4DmUI016176@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinaEy5sZ-an98KMN=sbZDoAe_7x=94RRg2wkBnV@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <be5e15bf-53de-4cfc-bd1a-fb1bed2bb543@email.android.com>

No specific reason...I could just set a PATH in the script for my own testing but I didn't. During my development the path would be headed by /option/csw/gnu so I need to avoid accidentally introducing use of a gnuism. Some of the full paths were like also inherited from whichever CAS I based this on...

Thanks
-Ben

Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote: > This now uses /usr/bin/grep instead of /usr/xpg4/bin/grep to work around > the fact that the xpg4 may not always be there. > okay. batching. out of curiosity, I find it puzzling why you give full paths for /usr/bin/cp, /usr/bin/grep,but not for awk. Probably, full paths arent really neccesary for any of them._____________________________________________
pkgsubmissions mailing list pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/attachments/20110216/f462898c/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 17 09:26:50 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:26:50 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTincZqC9wptKM-fqZoU=YpT+yncqgHV19i0H+N+Y@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTincZqC9wptKM-fqZoU=YpT+yncqgHV19i0H+N+Y@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <26A92B44-D895-46F8-8692-DEC0E3D15C77@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 16.02.2011 um 21:48 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> Am 14.02.2011 um 20:28 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
>>> * pixman: minor version upgrade
>>>  - from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
>>>  -   to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
>>>  + pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> 
>>> * libpixman: new package
>>>  + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>  + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>  + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>  + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> 
>> I noticed you released pixman and libpixman1, but not libpixman_dev. This is
>> not good. Please either roll back the change completely or release libpixman_dev.
>> I recommend handling all packages on one email as unseparable unit.
> 
> okiedokie that's fine.
> rollback in process.

Please be careful what you are doing:
  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4691
Is now everything correct again?


Best regards

  -- Dago



From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 17 09:35:52 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:35:52 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <26A92B44-D895-46F8-8692-DEC0E3D15C77@opencsw.org>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTincZqC9wptKM-fqZoU=YpT+yncqgHV19i0H+N+Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<26A92B44-D895-46F8-8692-DEC0E3D15C77@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <E8956D61-3A55-4F97-B7F2-E867A3964F47@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 17.02.2011 um 09:26 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Am 16.02.2011 um 21:48 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>> 
>>> Am 14.02.2011 um 20:28 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
>>>> * pixman: minor version upgrade
>>>> - from: 0.17.10,REV=2010.03.06
>>>> -   to: 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
>>>> + pixman-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>> 
>>>> * libpixman: new package
>>>> + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>> + libpixman1_0-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>> + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>> + libpixman_dev-0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> 
>>> I noticed you released pixman and libpixman1, but not libpixman_dev. This is
>>> not good. Please either roll back the change completely or release libpixman_dev.
>>> I recommend handling all packages on one email as unseparable unit.
>> 
>> okiedokie that's fine.
>> rollback in process.
> 
> Please be careful what you are doing:
>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4691
> Is now everything correct again?

Have you rolled back to 0.17.8? The the last released version was 0.17.10:
  http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw-future/allpkgs/

From https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4691
> There are at least three different versions that are mentioned as the latest on the various mirrors/websites.
> 
> Website:
> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWpixman/ [^] : 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02
> 
> ibiblio:
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/ [^] ->
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.10%2cREV%3d2010.03.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^]
> 
> usc.edu:
> http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^]
> 
> ftp.uni-erlangen.de
> http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz [^]


Best regards

  -- Dago


From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 17 18:26:41 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:26:41 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpixman1_0, libpixman_dev, pixman
In-Reply-To: <E8956D61-3A55-4F97-B7F2-E867A3964F47@opencsw.org>
References: <201102141928.p1EJSJ1u029472@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BD555496-FEF2-4193-B1C2-4FF4FDC850DA@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTincZqC9wptKM-fqZoU=YpT+yncqgHV19i0H+N+Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<26A92B44-D895-46F8-8692-DEC0E3D15C77@opencsw.org>
	<E8956D61-3A55-4F97-B7F2-E867A3964F47@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTincM=_LD9ddzXE2HXgOeL7uKDp_S4h5i2PO17vM@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
> Have you rolled back to 0.17.8? The the last released version was 0.17.10:
> ?http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw-future/allpkgs/

sorry... I went to one of the archive sites, and picked what looked
like the latest to me. Guess I missed a rev.

Bumping to 0.17.10

From william at wbonnet.net  Thu Feb 17 20:55:59 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:55:59 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_fontttf
Message-ID: <201102171955.p1HJtxTm020766@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_fontttf: new package
  + pm_fontttf-0.48,REV=2011.02.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 17 21:09:12 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:09:12 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_fontttf
In-Reply-To: <201102171955.p1HJtxTm020766@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102171955.p1HJtxTm020766@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBNm5M_+XVJNVXESWB2tJGG7J5pkChJhpPEsO5@mail.gmail.com>

Trying to resist making jokes about stuttering.. :)
batched.


On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> * pm_fontttf: new package
> ?+ pm_fontttf-0.48,REV=2011.02.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>

From william at wbonnet.net  Thu Feb 17 21:21:57 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:21:57 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_beanutils, commons_beanutl_doc
Message-ID: <201102172021.p1HKLvXD016264@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_beanut: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.8.0,REV=2009.03.25
  -   to: 1.8.3,REV=2011.02.17
  + commons_beanutils-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_beanutl_doc-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 17 22:08:34 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:08:34 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_beanutils,
	commons_beanutl_doc
In-Reply-To: <201102172021.p1HKLvXD016264@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102172021.p1HKLvXD016264@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1U3dB=O34hJNQROoNYuo1RWtP-LETzus6xzxA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:21 PM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> * commons_beanut: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.8.0,REV=2009.03.25
> ?- ? to: 1.8.3,REV=2011.02.17
> ?+ commons_beanutils-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ commons_beanutl_doc-1.8.3,REV=2011.02.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz


hrrrm.. that confused me for a bit. there's the bogus matching thing happening.

Now that we have officially bumped the limits to 32 instead of 20, do
you want to rename commons_beanutl_doc ?

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 00:35:21 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:35:21 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_chain, commons_chain_doc
Message-ID: <201102172335.p1HNZLmv029665@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Fixing packages issues. No version bump

* commons_chain: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.25
  -   to: 2011.02.18
  + commons_chain-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_chain_doc-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 18 00:44:58 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:44:58 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_chain, commons_chain_doc
In-Reply-To: <201102172335.p1HNZLmv029665@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102172335.p1HNZLmv029665@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=tc3qAvvhYEZjw2xxU5WrWVnrdFPw2pZHngovX@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:35 PM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> Fixing packages issues. No version bump
>
> * commons_chain: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2009.03.25
> ?- ? to: 2011.02.18
> ?+ commons_chain-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ commons_chain_doc-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 11:49:41 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:49:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_cli, commons_cli_doc
Message-ID: <201102181049.p1IAnfRl018157@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_cli: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.1,REV=2009.03.25
  -   to: 1.2,REV=2011.02.18
  + commons_cli-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_cli_doc-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 11:50:12 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:50:12 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_codec, commons_codec_doc
Message-ID: <201102181050.p1IAoC87019014@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_codec: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.3,REV=2009.03.25
  -   to: 1.4,REV=2011.02.18
  + commons_codec-1.4,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_codec_doc-1.4,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 12:23:48 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:23:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_collect, commons_collect_doc
Message-ID: <201102181123.p1IBNm16014296@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_collect: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.11.13
  -   to: 2011.02.18
  + commons_collect-3.2.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_collect_doc-3.2.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 12:43:31 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:43:31 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_config, commons_config_doc
Message-ID: <201102181143.p1IBhVtx001184@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_config: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.27
  -   to: 2011.02.18
  + commons_config-1.6,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_config_doc-1.6,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 18 12:52:24 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:52:24 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill
Message-ID: <201102181152.p1IBqOwE010339@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* ldnsdrill: revision upgrade
  - from: 2011.02.02
  -   to: 2011.02.18
  + ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 18 13:19:20 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:19:20 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_prefork, ap2_suexec, ap2_worker,
	(...)
Message-ID: <201102181219.p1ICJKQW016703@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

This is a version bump in addition to fixing the primary open bugs
against the 2.2.16 release.  The dependency of ap2_worker on ap2_prefork
there only to force the ordering the pkg-get uses when doing the update.

Thanks
-Ben

* ap: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.2.16,REV=2010.10.09
  -   to: 2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30
  + ap2_prefork-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_suexec-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_suexec-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_worker-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ap2_worker-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2_devel-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2_devel-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2_manual-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apache2rt-2.2.17,REV=2011.01.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 16:50:48 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:50:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_digester, commons_digester_doc
Message-ID: <201102181550.p1IFomCt021979@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_digester: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.0,REV=2009.04.01
  -   to: 2.1,REV=2011.02.18
  + commons_digester-2.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_digester_doc-2.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 16:59:52 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:59:52 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_disco_doc, commons_discovery
Message-ID: <201102181559.p1IFxqaW013226@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_disco: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.26
  -   to: 2011.02.18
  + commons_disco_doc-0.4,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_discovery-0.4,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 17:36:11 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:36:11 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_email, commons_email_doc
Message-ID: <201102181636.p1IGaBCp025235@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_email: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.1,REV=2009.03.26
  -   to: 1.2,REV=2011.02.18
  + commons_email-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_email_doc-1.2,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 18 17:55:15 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:55:15 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill
In-Reply-To: <201102181152.p1IBqOwE010339@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102181152.p1IBqOwE010339@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=bPZQyK9qUtjm5jAKoUU1OKJYhgiyR-5CV8dYV@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On 2/18/11, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * ldnsdrill: revision upgrade
>   - from: 2011.02.02
>   -   to: 2011.02.18
>   + ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ldnsdrill-1.6.8,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 18:04:35 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:04:35 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_httpcl_doc, commons_httpclient
Message-ID: <201102181704.p1IH4Zdw015514@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_httpcl: minor version upgrade
  - from: 3.0.1
  -   to: 3.1,REV=2011.02.18
  + commons_httpcl_doc-3.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_httpclient-3.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 18 18:18:02 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:18:02 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_prefork, ap2_suexec, ap2_worker,
	(...)
In-Reply-To: <201102181219.p1ICJKQW016703@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102181219.p1ICJKQW016703@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikPY0korvzmm20-Wv7fXHSFJtCjbhRvj6M64cCv@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/18/11, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> This is a version bump in addition to fixing the primary open bugs
> against the 2.2.16 release.  The dependency of ap2_worker on ap2_prefork
> there only to force the ordering the pkg-get uses when doing the update.
>

great.

erm... couple things.

1. in ap2_suexec
1 e build /opt/csw/apache2/ap2mod/suexec ? ? ? 1361 42702 1296400953

should the perms really be "? ? ?"
If they do, then okay. If it "doesnt matter", it would be nice if you
set them to something anyway, to avoid triggering an old perms check
routine.

2. in "apache2":
./root/opt/csw/apache2/share/cgi-bin/printenv:#!/usr/local/bin/perl

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 18 18:43:09 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:43:09 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_prefork, ap2_suexec, ap2_worker,
	(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikPY0korvzmm20-Wv7fXHSFJtCjbhRvj6M64cCv@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102181219.p1ICJKQW016703@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikPY0korvzmm20-Wv7fXHSFJtCjbhRvj6M64cCv@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTH4vjKJdNTgkJinV0-uL3jskjcxNzHSoUX1yw@mail.gmail.com>

Also... I see that "httpd.h" is historically marked in the
apache2_devel pkg  as "ignore bad paths in this file"... but
it doesnt actually seem appropriate, for

#define DEFAULT_PATH "/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bsd:/usr/local/bin"

It's appropriate in a sense, for our "users" using it, if they happen
to want to put their own stuff in /usr/local/bin

But if any of our *maintainers* use it, that would seem like a hidden
nasty gotcha, so it would be better to have /opt/csw/bin.
Or at minimum, /opt/csw/bin *before* /usr/local/bin

Do you agree?

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 18 18:52:25 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:52:25 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_httpcl_doc,
	commons_httpclient
In-Reply-To: <201102181704.p1IH4Zdw015514@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102181704.p1IH4Zdw015514@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikWcH0tV_=OjcO4AzfyaT_nEp7q+WYN0ARg0oEM@mail.gmail.com>

You've been busy! :)

you are also uploading a lot of packages that could have benefitted
from a rename.

disco_doc, httpcl_doc.

I'll wait for another hour to see if your upload stream has abated,
and then batch the whole set you've done so far.



On 2/18/11, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> * commons_httpcl: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 3.0.1
>   -   to: 3.1,REV=2011.02.18
>   + commons_httpcl_doc-3.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + commons_httpclient-3.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 18 19:16:07 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:16:07 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_io, commons_io_doc
Message-ID: <201102181816.p1IIG73J027914@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_io: major version upgrade
  - from: 1.4,REV=2009.03.25
  -   to: 2.0.1,REV=2011.02.18
  + commons_io-2.0.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_io_doc-2.0.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 18 19:17:58 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:17:58 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ap2_prefork, ap2_suexec, ap2_worker,
	(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTH4vjKJdNTgkJinV0-uL3jskjcxNzHSoUX1yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102181219.p1ICJKQW016703@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikPY0korvzmm20-Wv7fXHSFJtCjbhRvj6M64cCv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTH4vjKJdNTgkJinV0-uL3jskjcxNzHSoUX1yw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1298053065-sup-5522@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Feb 18 12:43:09 -0500
2011:

I'll look at both of these issues that you note.  I'm going by memory
here, but I _think_ the '? ? ?' is appropriate when using e build but
I'll double check it.


> Also... I see that "httpd.h" is historically marked in the
> apache2_devel pkg  as "ignore bad paths in this file"... but
> it doesnt actually seem appropriate, for

This was built before the new checks were implemented.  Will addres,
and then use the new cswreleasenotes as appropriate at that itme.

> Do you agree?

Yes, thanks.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 02:58:30 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:58:30 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_lang, commons_lang_doc
Message-ID: <201102190158.p1J1wUZF005548@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_lang: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.4,REV=2009.03.26
  -   to: 2.6,REV=2011.02.19
  + commons_lang-2.6,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_lang_doc-2.6,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 03:05:01 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:05:01 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_logging, commons_logging_doc
Message-ID: <201102190205.p1J251WM016659@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_logging: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.25
  -   to: 2011.02.19
  + commons_logging-1.1.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_logging_doc-1.1.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From skayser at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 03:19:33 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:19:33 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs supybot
Message-ID: <201102190219.p1J2JX9k028382@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Extensible IRC bot (an instance of which populates #opencsw under the
name of ceeswi).

* supybot: new package
  + supybot-0.83.4.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 03:19:48 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:19:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_math, commons_math_doc
Message-ID: <201102190219.p1J2JmL5028442@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_math: major version upgrade
  - from: 1.2,REV=2009.03.26
  -   to: 2.1,REV=2011.02.19
  + commons_math-2.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_math_doc-2.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 03:30:18 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:30:18 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_net, commons_net_doc
Message-ID: <201102190230.p1J2UIqS009696@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_net: major version upgrade
  - from: 1.4.1
  -   to: 2.2,REV=2011.02.19
  + commons_net-2.2,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_net_doc-2.2,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 03:40:59 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:40:59 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_pool, commons_pool_doc
Message-ID: <201102190240.p1J2expd019736@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_pool: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.4,REV=2009.03.26
  -   to: 1.5.5,REV=2011.02.19
  + commons_pool-1.5.5,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_pool_doc-1.5.5,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 03:52:31 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:52:31 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_primit_doc, commons_primitives
Message-ID: <201102190252.p1J2qV53029345@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_primit: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.26
  -   to: 2011.02.19
  + commons_primit_doc-1.0,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_primitives-1.0,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 11:50:35 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:50:35 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_upload, commons_upload_doc
Message-ID: <201102191050.p1JAoZRA010250@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_upload: revision upgrade
  - from: 2007.02.24
  -   to: 2011.02.19
  + commons_upload-1.2.2,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_upload_doc-1.2.2,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 11:53:24 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:53:24 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_valid_doc, commons_validator
Message-ID: <201102191053.p1JArOq3012640@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* commons_validator: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.25
  -   to: 2011.02.19
  + commons_validator-1.3.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* commons_valid_doc: new package
  + commons_valid_doc-1.3.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 12:34:11 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:34:11 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_validat_doc, commons_validator
Message-ID: <201102191134.p1JBYBlH016831@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Re submiting. Previous submit had a catalog name error for ocumentation packae

* commons_validat: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.25
  -   to: 2011.02.19
  + commons_validat_doc-1.3.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_validator-1.3.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 19 12:36:11 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:36:11 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_valid_doc,
	commons_validator
In-Reply-To: <201102191053.p1JArOq3012640@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102191053.p1JArOq3012640@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <79CD6B37-37E0-442F-87A2-33917AEF2602@wbonnet.net>

hi

Please ignore this submission. The catalog of the documentation package is wrong. A new submission has been done and package removed from bender

cheers
W.

Le 19 f?vr. 2011 ? 10:53, William Bonnet a ?crit :

> * commons_validator: revision upgrade
>  - from: 2009.03.25
>  -   to: 2011.02.19
>  + commons_validator-1.3.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> * commons_valid_doc: new package
>  + commons_valid_doc-1.3.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> -- 
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions

--
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 12:58:48 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?xLBoc2FuwqBEb8SfYW4=?=)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:58:48 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldnsdrill, libldns1, libldns_devel,
 l(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikj88mo8Z5rcXRb7dVMSz_tXSfJy9tW4x3kRu2=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102021134.p12BYDg0024335@login.bo.opencsw.org>	<AANLkTimPwX8e_UBy9a8JcL53qo740ChTX0aDF4ubeRvu@mail.gmail.com>	<4D554FAC.8080207@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikj88mo8Z5rcXRb7dVMSz_tXSfJy9tW4x3kRu2=@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D5FB078.2090601@opencsw.org>

Am 11.02.2011 16:34, schrieb Philip Brown:

>>> packages now batched.
>>> Assorted renames done.
>>> (drill ->  ldnsdrill,   ldns ->libldns1, ldns_devel ->  libldns_devel)
>>> (lot of work, yuck)
>>
>> I've just noticed, that drill is still in the catalog:
>> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWdrill/
>>
> 
> Thank you for noticing that.
> (hmm. thought I renamed, so delete wasnt neccessary. sigh. )
> 
> now removed.

Just noticed that ldns is also still in the catalog. This package has to
be removed also.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch        http://blog.dogan.ch/

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 13:23:22 2011
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 06:23:22 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
Message-ID: <201102191223.p1JCNMZG004018@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* mercurial: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.7.3,REV=2011.01.02
  -   to: 1.7.5,REV=2011.02.19
  + mercurial-1.7.5,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + mercurial-1.7.5,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 15:33:14 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:33:14 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_filetail
Message-ID: <201102191433.p1JEXEv0013347@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_filetail: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.98,REV=2004.04.12
  -   to: 0.99.3,REV=2011.02.19
  + pm_filetail-0.99.3,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 16:03:18 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:03:18 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tomcat6
Message-ID: <201102191503.p1JF3I7o000907@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This takeover has been already discussed with William Bonnet.

* tomcat6: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 6.0.18,REV=2008.11.29
  -   to: 6.0.32,REV=2011.02.19
  + tomcat6-6.0.32,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 16:24:35 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:24:35 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mrtg
Message-ID: <201102191524.p1JFOZCL020239@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* mrtg: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.16.3,REV=2010.03.18
  -   to: 2.17.1,REV=2011.02.19
  + mrtg-2.17.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + mrtg-2.17.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 16:46:08 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:46:08 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_mimetools
Message-ID: <201102191546.p1JFk844017581@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_mimetools: minor version upgrade
  - from: 5.427,REV=2008.11.16
  -   to: 5.428,REV=2011.02.19
  + pm_mimetools-5.428,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 19 18:49:57 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:49:57 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_speedycgiperl
Message-ID: <201102191749.p1JHnvHZ003189@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This is also a takover from the retired maintainer Alex Moore.

* pm_speedycgiperl: revision upgrade
  - from: 2006.12.05
  -   to: 2011.02.19
  + pm_speedycgiperl-2.22,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_speedycgiperl-2.22,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 20 09:57:54 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:57:54 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_config, commons_config_doc
Message-ID: <201102200857.p1K8vsBW027149@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Remove CSWajclang dependency to brak circular dependency

* commons_config: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.03.27
  -   to: 2011.02.20
  + commons_config-1.6,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + commons_config_doc-1.6,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Feb 20 21:47:09 2011
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:47:09 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs php5, php5_devel
Message-ID: <201102202047.p1KKl9mN024780@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* php5: minor version upgrade
  - from: 5.2.9,REV=2009.05.06
  -   to: 5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20
  + php5-5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + php5-5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* php5_devel: minor version upgrade
  - from: 5.2.9,REV=2009.04.29
  -   to: 5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20
  + php5_devel-5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + php5_devel-5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Feb 20 21:58:47 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:58:47 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_speedycgiperl
In-Reply-To: <201102191749.p1JHnvHZ003189@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102191749.p1JHnvHZ003189@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAeOinDEq4JaEd5SMFqiaTxsRMF5TXJ79-1T1i@mail.gmail.com>

batched btw

On Saturday, February 19, 2011, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This is also a takover from the retired maintainer Alex Moore.
>
> * pm_speedycgiperl: revision upgrade
>  ?- from: 2006.12.05
>  ?- ? to: 2011.02.19
>  ?+ pm_speedycgiperl-2.22,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ pm_speedycgiperl-2.22,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Feb 20 22:21:41 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:21:41 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs php5, php5_devel
In-Reply-To: <201102202047.p1KKl9mN024780@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102202047.p1KKl9mN024780@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1298236702-sup-9035@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from THURNER Rupert's message of Sun Feb 20 15:47:09 -0500
2011:

Hi Rupert,

> * php5: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 5.2.9,REV=2009.05.06
>   -   to: 5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20
>   + php5-5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + php5-5.3.5,REV=2011.02.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks for cranking out this update!  Unfortunately, it can't go out
th edoor as is.  There are all sorts of legacy php5_foo packages that
are now rolled in to this one but these don't declare themselves
Incompatible with the old ones.

I see the notes about the build issues wrt the old extensions.  I'll
take a look at this and see what I can do...It would be nicer to keep
the older structure, I think.  This is primarily because the module
structure changed with the last release as well, not because I prefer
one or the other.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb 22 18:03:36 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:03:36 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs supybot
In-Reply-To: <201102190219.p1J2JX9k028382@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102190219.p1J2JX9k028382@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=fEPs4W7cWKTm_qfkSZTN76SOBERe8n6vd8_9j@mail.gmail.com>

was batched

On 2/18/11, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Extensible IRC bot (an instance of which populates #opencsw under the
> name of ceeswi).
>
> * supybot: new package
>   + supybot-0.83.4.1,REV=2011.02.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb 22 18:03:55 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:03:55 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
In-Reply-To: <201102191223.p1JCNMZG004018@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102191223.p1JCNMZG004018@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikHrnqSLJw0t_5RjF=H_3i5pqnpbH9OzMtB6Nrp@mail.gmail.com>

was batched

On 2/19/11, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * mercurial: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 1.7.3,REV=2011.01.02
>   -   to: 1.7.5,REV=2011.02.19
>   + mercurial-1.7.5,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + mercurial-1.7.5,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb 22 18:04:42 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:04:42 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_filetail
In-Reply-To: <201102191433.p1JEXEv0013347@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102191433.p1JEXEv0013347@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikrbrr7pcJpWbL5g8EKRGSnXpxLNVRKvTD8rbKY@mail.gmail.com>

was batched

On 2/19/11, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_filetail: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 0.98,REV=2004.04.12
>   -   to: 0.99.3,REV=2011.02.19
>   + pm_filetail-0.99.3,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb 22 18:04:58 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:04:58 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mrtg
In-Reply-To: <201102191524.p1JFOZCL020239@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102191524.p1JFOZCL020239@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=nyDNB1fYqxuRNAyZXO47w9wMNy1JQU2+usnfw@mail.gmail.com>

was batched

On 2/19/11, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * mrtg: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 2.16.3,REV=2010.03.18
>   -   to: 2.17.1,REV=2011.02.19
>   + mrtg-2.17.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + mrtg-2.17.1,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb 22 18:05:32 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:05:32 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_mimetools
In-Reply-To: <201102191546.p1JFk844017581@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102191546.p1JFk844017581@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi==vfWKyjjpczfKxSYY+ZTdXnSesAJkJH+E+c=D@mail.gmail.com>

was batched

On 2/19/11, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_mimetools: minor version upgrade
>   - from: 5.427,REV=2008.11.16
>   -   to: 5.428,REV=2011.02.19
>   + pm_mimetools-5.428,REV=2011.02.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Feb 22 18:11:12 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:11:12 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs php5, php5_devel
In-Reply-To: <1298236702-sup-9035@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201102202047.p1KKl9mN024780@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1298236702-sup-9035@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinzdhLF+j+e_qsb=YVRcMawub3HTTt+RV5HU5fg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/20/11, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for cranking out this update!  Unfortunately, it can't go out
> th edoor as is.  There are all sorts of legacy php5_foo packages that
> are now rolled in to this one but these don't declare themselves
> Incompatible with the old ones.
>
> I see the notes about the build issues wrt the old extensions.  I'll
> take a look at this and see what I can do...It would be nicer to keep
> the older structure, I think.  This is primarily because the module
> structure changed with the last release as well, not because I prefer
> one or the other.
>

I think the split_up structure is much nicer.
There are a gazillion separate php modules, which pull in a whole
bunch of dependencies, most of which many people will never use.
Not only is this annoying at install time, this also affects upgrade time.
(ie: people will get prompted for upgrades on things, that they dont
really care about. It wastes their time)

A certain other place, also splits it up, probably for similar reasons. See

http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=squeeze&keywords=php5

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Feb 23 14:26:33 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:26:33 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bind, bind_chroot, bind_devel,
	bind_u(...)
Message-ID: <201102231326.p1NDQX0b005050@login.bo.opencsw.org>

No package/catalog renames due to current flux, will wait. Devel package not
arch all anymore.

* bind: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 9.7.2P3,REV=2010.12.03
  -   to: 9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23
  + bind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_chroot-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_devel-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_devel-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_utils-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + bind_utils-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libbind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libbind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Feb 23 20:22:43 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:22:43 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs bind, bind_chroot, bind_devel,
	bind_u(...)
In-Reply-To: <201102231326.p1NDQX0b005050@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102231326.p1NDQX0b005050@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimRe9gOc9M9p=3p48=qe8u4OFFBX2LZ63R3ubgr@mail.gmail.com>

thanks. batched.


On 2/23/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No package/catalog renames due to current flux, will wait. Devel package not
> arch all anymore.
>
> * bind: patchlevel upgrade
>   - from: 9.7.2P3,REV=2010.12.03
>   -   to: 9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23
>   + bind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_chroot-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_devel-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_devel-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_utils-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + bind_utils-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libbind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + libbind-9.7.3,REV=2011.02.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 24 17:25:10 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:25:10 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs botnet
Message-ID: <201102241625.p1OGPAMd017346@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Rebuilt to lose dep to cswclassutils, now only uses cas_cpsampleconf and cas_migrateconf.

* botnet: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.03.24
  -   to: 2011.02.24
  + botnet-0.8,REV=2011.02.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 24 17:30:19 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:30:19 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs policyd_weight
Message-ID: <201102241630.p1OGUJpA019283@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Updated to 0.1.15.1.
Rebuilt to lose dep to cswclassutils, now only uses cas_initsmf and cas_usergroup.
Catalog name changed to match package name (which may be why submitpkg thinks it's a new package).
The /usr/local refs are harmless, I deliver an init script which picks up the correct conf file.

* policyd_weight: new package
  + policyd_weight-0.1.15.1,REV=2011.02.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb 24 19:17:13 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:17:13 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs botnet
In-Reply-To: <201102241625.p1OGPAMd017346@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102241625.p1OGPAMd017346@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDRYyrSPneBykY=0u3MSfD9Yh-o16VfpnXwaaZ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/24/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Rebuilt to lose dep to cswclassutils, now only uses cas_cpsampleconf and
> cas_migrateconf.
>

That's good stuff, thanks.
What do you think about using cas_cptemplates instead of
cas_cpsampleconf, though?

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb 24 19:19:45 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:19:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs policyd_weight
In-Reply-To: <201102241630.p1OGUJpA019283@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102241630.p1OGUJpA019283@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=hJqxUUSQt22RW4cNyy+w4mY--bF+Um4JGBo=w@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/24/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Updated to 0.1.15.1.
> Rebuilt to lose dep to cswclassutils, now only uses cas_initsmf and
> cas_usergroup.
> Catalog name changed to match package name (which may be why submitpkg
> thinks it's a new package).

Thanks for the heads-up on that. Handling the rename.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Feb 24 20:26:39 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:26:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs botnet
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimDRYyrSPneBykY=0u3MSfD9Yh-o16VfpnXwaaZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102241625.p1OGPAMd017346@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimDRYyrSPneBykY=0u3MSfD9Yh-o16VfpnXwaaZ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Dsx-aSRG=yi8vCiBE7GdVHRNkfzoXaQu412YW@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> What do you think about using cas_cptemplates instead of
> cas_cpsampleconf, though?

Maybe next time.

/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Feb 24 23:02:54 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:02:54 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs botnet
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Dsx-aSRG=yi8vCiBE7GdVHRNkfzoXaQu412YW@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102241625.p1OGPAMd017346@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimDRYyrSPneBykY=0u3MSfD9Yh-o16VfpnXwaaZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=Dsx-aSRG=yi8vCiBE7GdVHRNkfzoXaQu412YW@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTiniJj3rLfJZqwd1m-DEWu1sNesAxcp+Vw7-SDyL@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/24/11, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> What do you think about using cas_cptemplates instead of
>> cas_cpsampleconf, though?
>
> Maybe next time.
>

Okay. batching this round.
For the next package you are building that uses cpsampleconf or
equivalent, please consider whether cptemplates is more appropriate,
beore submitting it

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 25 11:25:27 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:25:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>

Hi Gordon,

Am 15.02.2011 um 13:44 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Am 10.02.2011 um 18:38 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Feb 09 23:54:07 -0500 2011:
>>> 
>>>> Hrrr... it would have been nice if whoever put that in there, put in
>>>> a comment to say *why* they put that in there :( Any guesses? would
>>>> be nice to know if its still needed.
>>> 
>>> The svn log might be of use for this?  Checkpkg is good at catching
>>> this error in both directions, so if it's not complaining right now,
>>> the override should be removed.
>> 
>> makes sense to me.
>> But waiting on a response from "the maintainer".
> 
> Ping? I just got a request on #opencsw that a user is waiting on this update :-)

A bug was opened about missing gnulink for findutils:
  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4697

Gordon: Would you mind having a look?

Am 08.02.2011 um 18:05 schrieb Gordon Marler:
> Update of findutils to properly set up GNU links
> 
> Corresponding update to gnulinks package (tested by Dagobert) that remove the links
> that are now in the findutils pkg
> 
> * findutils: revision upgrade
>  - from: 2009.06.08
>  -   to: 2011.02.08
>  + findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> * gnulinks: revision upgrade
>  - from: 2010.10.11
>  -   to: 2011.01.11
>  + gnulinks-1.4,REV=2011.01.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Phil: Would you please make sure *at all times* that all packages submitted
together are also released together?


Best regards

  -- Dago


From skayser at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 25 11:24:25 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:24:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
	<FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20110225102424.GA28572@sebastiankayser.de>

* Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Am 08.02.2011 um 18:05 schrieb Gordon Marler:
> > Update of findutils to properly set up GNU links
> > 
> > Corresponding update to gnulinks package (tested by Dagobert) that remove the links
> > that are now in the findutils pkg
> > 
> > * findutils: revision upgrade
> >  - from: 2009.06.08
> >  -   to: 2011.02.08
> >  + findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> >  + findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> > 
> > * gnulinks: revision upgrade
> >  - from: 2010.10.11
> >  -   to: 2011.01.11
> >  + gnulinks-1.4,REV=2011.01.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> Phil: Would you please make sure *at all times* that all packages submitted
> together are also released together?

Seem to me as if some concept of grouping / transactions that is
assisted by tools on both ends of the release gate would be useful.

Sebastian

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 25 15:54:42 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:54:42 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
	<FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQWSk5ZBc7OAujH_0Vs1fEH=UGu2ZpnR_GxVNB@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:

> Hi Gordon,
>
> Phil: Would you please make sure *at all times* that all packages submitted
> together are also released together?
>
>
Do the maintainers themselves, always want this behaviour,though?
I would think sometimes (perhaps most of the times) ifi they are submitting
packages that are unrelated, as some people often do, that they would want
ones that are good for release, to be released.

If people want to go with a loose "policy" going forward, that packages
submitted together in one email, get released or held as as group, I'm fine
with that. Just wondering if that's what people really want.

(Would certainly make MY life easier, if people did not group unrelated
things together :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/attachments/20110225/f161a330/attachment.html>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Fri Feb 25 16:16:48 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:16:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQWSk5ZBc7OAujH_0Vs1fEH=UGu2ZpnR_GxVNB@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:54:42 -0800")
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
	<FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimQWSk5ZBc7OAujH_0Vs1fEH=UGu2ZpnR_GxVNB@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x61v2wf8kf.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gordon,
>>
>> Phil: Would you please make sure *at all times* that all packages submitted
>> together are also released together?
>>
>>
> Do the maintainers themselves, always want this behaviour,though?
> I would think sometimes (perhaps most of the times) ifi they are submitting
> packages that are unrelated, as some people often do, that they would want
> ones that are good for release, to be released.
>
> If people want to go with a loose "policy" going forward, that packages
> submitted together in one email, get released or held as as group, I'm fine
> with that. Just wondering if that's what people really want.
>
> (Would certainly make MY life easier, if people did not group unrelated
> things together :)

This packages were related as gnulinks provided symbolic links for the
findutils which is no more true, as we agreed that each package start to
provide its symbolic links. Consequently, when gnulinks is submitted with
another package, consider it as an atomic upgrade.
-- 
Peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Feb 25 17:25:49 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:25:49 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions]  newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <x61v2wf8kf.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
	<FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimQWSk5ZBc7OAujH_0Vs1fEH=UGu2ZpnR_GxVNB@mail.gmail.com>
	<x61v2wf8kf.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik=-o=gk-HNeN9M8+N4QHjEvUOrZ0tKJ73yBP=W@mail.gmail.com>

On Friday, February 25, 2011, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Consequently, when gnulinks is submitted with
another package, consider it as an atomic upgrade.



sorry for being unclear. yes I agree those packages were related and I
knew that already . i  intended to make a more general statement

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 25 23:18:14 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:18:14 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xml_atom
Message-ID: <201102252218.p1PMIEUt014699@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_xml_atom: new package
  + pm_xml_atom-0.37,REV=2011.02.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Feb 25 23:34:37 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:34:37 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xml_encoding
Message-ID: <201102252234.p1PMYbNU024197@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_xml_encoding: new package
  + pm_xml_encoding-2.08,REV=2011.02.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 26 10:34:02 2011
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:34:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik=-o=gk-HNeN9M8+N4QHjEvUOrZ0tKJ73yBP=W@mail.gmail.com>
	(Philip Brown's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:25:49 -0800")
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
	<FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimQWSk5ZBc7OAujH_0Vs1fEH=UGu2ZpnR_GxVNB@mail.gmail.com>
	<x61v2wf8kf.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTik=-o=gk-HNeN9M8+N4QHjEvUOrZ0tKJ73yBP=W@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6ei6vdtrp.fsf@opencsw.org>

Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:

> On Friday, February 25, 2011, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Consequently, when gnulinks is submitted with
>> another package, consider it as an atomic upgrade.

> sorry for being unclear. yes I agree those packages were related and I
> knew that already . i  intended to make a more general statement

Now, that the general statement is made, can you release the
corresponding findutils package. The reason for which it is stalled, in
my opinion is moot.

-- 
Peter

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Feb 26 12:28:41 2011
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:28:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_crypt_des_ede3
Message-ID: <201102261128.p1QBSfj4029595@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_crypt_des_ede3: new package
  + pm_crypt_des_ede3-0.01,REV=2011.02.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 26 17:01:41 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:01:41 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs findutils, gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <x6ei6vdtrp.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <201102081705.p18H5pEk010597@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTim5NZmQNxNZJ2igg2JKKeGkg3m0AUF0gNAbC_Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=okoFzZrm+T7D=3ev-3PukcrGxsx+LV5+zm9eM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=O79e_QBB_Ev8xLEB621aDS8u4UQ5mJkSsUa9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297344598-sup-9566@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinZzndQWoqB-TpyC3ZGUPYJyKA7vSO2S+bymFLS@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9109A4B-930C-4DA7-B0F2-E4613F89C052@opencsw.org>
	<FEE80B80-10F6-45BE-854C-C723E4BAEFC2@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimQWSk5ZBc7OAujH_0Vs1fEH=UGu2ZpnR_GxVNB@mail.gmail.com>
	<x61v2wf8kf.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTik=-o=gk-HNeN9M8+N4QHjEvUOrZ0tKJ73yBP=W@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6ei6vdtrp.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinvwaFGN6QF4u4AbWCTKMh=9W_REtdYqgzkXxD2@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> writes:
>
>> On Friday, February 25, 2011, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Consequently, when gnulinks is submitted with
>>> another package, consider it as an atomic upgrade.
>
>> sorry for being unclear. yes I agree those packages were related and I
>> knew that already . i ?intended to make a more general statement
>
> Now, that the general statement is made, can you release the
> corresponding findutils package. The reason for which it is stalled, in
> my opinion is moot.

I was previously waiting for a response from the maintainer
The maintainer's last correspondence that I see, was,

"Got it, just wasn't in a position to reply at that moment - on it now..."
[apparently, was a private email to me]

Hmm. although I do see a new package, dated the day after, with the
dependency removed. Unfortunately, it is
findutils-4.4.2,REV=2011.02.12-SunOS5.9-sparc-UNCOMMITTED.pkg.gz

Copying maintainer to request fix...

From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Feb 26 17:08:36 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:08:36 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_crypt_des_ede3
In-Reply-To: <201102261128.p1QBSfj4029595@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201102261128.p1QBSfj4029595@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikmyFXQcx5G3-n0BUDAbq+=DTt1D3ig9zNhpjOt@mail.gmail.com>

This,and your other two perl packages, batched now


On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:28 AM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
> * pm_crypt_des_ede3: new package
> ?+ pm_crypt_des_ede3-0.01,REV=2011.02.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 28 15:16:00 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:16:00 -0500
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] apache2c removal
Message-ID: <1298902550-sup-2746@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>


Hi Phil,

CSWapache2c was removed from the database but still exists in the
catalog and mirrors.  Can you please remove it.  (It's causing
checkpkg errors about file collisions.)

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 28 19:57:56 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:57:56 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] apache2c removal
In-Reply-To: <1298902550-sup-2746@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <1298902550-sup-2746@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim-crigUWxakugi2Qw--m5bQJzp3D4dSYfd_eJZ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> CSWapache2c was removed from the database but still exists in the
> catalog and mirrors. ?Can you please remove it. ?(It's causing
> checkpkg errors about file collisions.)

problem after move:

ERROR 1130 (00000): Host '82.220.5.52' is not allowed to connect to
this MySQL server

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 28 20:31:23 2011
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?xLBoc2FuwqBEb8SfYW4=?=)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:31:23 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] apache2c removal
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim-crigUWxakugi2Qw--m5bQJzp3D4dSYfd_eJZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1298902550-sup-2746@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTim-crigUWxakugi2Qw--m5bQJzp3D4dSYfd_eJZ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D6BF80B.1040609@opencsw.org>

Am 28.02.2011 19:57, schrieb Philip Brown:

> problem after move:
> 
> ERROR 1130 (00000): Host '82.220.5.52' is not allowed to connect to
> this MySQL server

Fixed.
The wrong IP address was used for outgoing connections.




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch        http://blog.dogan.ch/

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 28 22:12:35 2011
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:12:35 -0800
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] apache2c removal
In-Reply-To: <4D6BF80B.1040609@opencsw.org>
References: <1298902550-sup-2746@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTim-crigUWxakugi2Qw--m5bQJzp3D4dSYfd_eJZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D6BF80B.1040609@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=cYfG+Lg=J50k8Fz_SodO8zKiqxkAoa2+8JD0v@mail.gmail.com>

THanks. apache2c removed in current mirrors
(change batched, anyways)


2011/2/28 ?hsan?Do?an <ihsan at opencsw.org>:
> Am 28.02.2011 19:57, schrieb Philip Brown:
>
>> problem after move:
>>
>> ERROR 1130 (00000): Host '82.220.5.52' is not allowed to connect to
>> this MySQL server
>
> Fixed.
> The wrong IP address was used for outgoing connections.
>
>
>
>
> Ihsan
>
> --
> ihsan at dogan.ch ? ? ? ?http://blog.dogan.ch/
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Feb 28 23:01:01 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:01:01 +0000
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] apache2c removal
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cYfG+Lg=J50k8Fz_SodO8zKiqxkAoa2+8JD0v@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1298902550-sup-2746@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTim-crigUWxakugi2Qw--m5bQJzp3D4dSYfd_eJZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D6BF80B.1040609@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTi=cYfG+Lg=J50k8Fz_SodO8zKiqxkAoa2+8JD0v@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNQ+f0ebajNXKrCrgoq+1iwEVFuHtX78r65E5k@mail.gmail.com>

2011/2/28 Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org>:
> THanks. apache2c removed in current mirrors
> (change batched, anyways)

I don't know for sure, but I think the same problem may concern the
following packages:

CSWpmtt2-common vs CSWpmtt2
CSWpy-yaml vs CSWpyyaml
CSWxproto vs CSWx11xproto
CSWfirefox-fr vs CSWffox-l10n-fr

Maciej