[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dialog

[Philip Brown]

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, fully (not probably) aware, that's what the Solaris 9 clarification
> mail was for. Add other common TERMs (like rxvt or screen where we
> worked around it in a lengthy bug discussion) into the mix and the issue
> also applies Solaris 10.

I recognize your point of "[other, newer TERM types arent handled well
by native solaris]".
That being said, we could (and probably *should*) handle that sort of
thing better at the individual package level.
For example, rxvt could ship terminfo entries for itself.
Ditto for screen.