From ai at opencsw.org Wed Jun 1 17:19:13 2011 From: ai at opencsw.org (Andy Igoshin) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:19:13 +0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nginx-1.0.4 Message-ID: <201106011919.13310.ai@opencsw.org> nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Andy Igoshin Voronezh State University Phone: +7 473 2522406 Network Operation Center Fax: +7 473 2208820 Voronezh, Russia From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 1 23:48:09 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:48:09 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nginx-1.0.4 In-Reply-To: <201106011919.13310.ai@opencsw.org> References: <201106011919.13310.ai@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Are you moving to a "twice a month" update schedule for this, Andy? :) batched On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Andy Igoshin wrote: > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Andy Igoshin ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Voronezh State University > Phone: +7 473 2522406 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Network Operation Center > Fax: ? +7 473 2208820 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Voronezh, Russia > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From rupert at opencsw.org Thu Jun 2 16:30:42 2011 From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:30:42 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial Message-ID: <201106021430.p52EUftZ016202@login.bo.opencsw.org> * mercurial: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.8.3,REV=2011.05.03 - to: 1.8.4,REV=2011.06.02 + mercurial-1.8.4,REV=2011.06.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mercurial-1.8.4,REV=2011.06.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From ai at opencsw.org Thu Jun 2 16:53:38 2011 From: ai at opencsw.org (Andy Igoshin) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:53:38 +0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nginx-1.0.4 In-Reply-To: References: <201106011919.13310.ai@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <201106021853.38177.ai@opencsw.org> On 2 of June 2011 01:48:09 Philip Brown wrote: > Are you moving to a "twice a month" update schedule for this, Andy? :) when stable releases are ready i will package them. :) > batched > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Andy Igoshin wrote: > > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > nginx-1.0.4,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Andy Igoshin Voronezh State University Phone: +7 473 2522406 Network Operation Center Fax: +7 473 2208820 Voronezh, Russia From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Jun 2 21:41:02 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:41:02 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue May 17 12:47:05 -0400 2011: > FYI, to tie loose ends together in this archive; since you declined > to start a vote off, I have started a discussion about stub naming > on the maintainer list . Nobody seems to have an opinion on this in your spun out thread...batching? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 2 21:55:08 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:55:08 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue May 17 12:47:05 -0400 2011: > >> FYI, to tie loose ends together in this archive; since you declined >> to start a vote off, I have started a discussion about stub naming >> on the maintainer list . > > Nobody seems to have an opinion on this in your spun out > thread...batching? Well, on the one hand, there has been no general discussion, which is unfortunate. However, nor is there a "majority of maintainers" (or even anything close to it) who have spoken up on this issue. Please set up a vote on it. I would suggest a format similar to http://wiki.opencsw.org/vote-release-process, and that the ballot reference the wiki page, giving as voting choices only, "option A, on http....." "option B, on http..." that way, people have to at least go to the page, to know what they are voting for. From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 2 21:56:12 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:56:12 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial In-Reply-To: <201106021430.p52EUftZ016202@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106021430.p52EUftZ016202@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: thanks. batched On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:30 AM, THURNER Rupert wrote: > * mercurial: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.8.3,REV=2011.05.03 > ?- ? to: 1.8.4,REV=2011.06.02 > ?+ mercurial-1.8.4,REV=2011.06.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ mercurial-1.8.4,REV=2011.06.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Jun 2 22:06:21 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:06:21 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1307045132-sup-8733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 02 15:55:08 -0400 2011: > Well, on the one hand, there has been no general discussion, which is > unfortunate. However, nor is there a "majority of maintainers" (or > even anything close to it) who have spoken up on this issue. Please > set up a vote on it. Well, in that case, we may as well wait until after the release process vote. This will be wasted time otherwise. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 2 22:09:48 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:09:48 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: <1307045132-sup-8733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307045132-sup-8733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 02 15:55:08 -0400 2011: > >> Well, on the one hand, there has been no general discussion, which is >> unfortunate. However, nor is there a "majority of maintainers" (or >> even anything close to it) who have spoken up on this issue. Please >> set up a vote on it. > > Well, in that case, we may as well wait until after the release > process vote. ?This will be wasted time otherwise. Wasted time? How so? "I think the current behaviour of gar is a bad idea. But you think it's a good idea. Therefore, no vote will happen" Is that how things will work, in the new world order? From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Jun 2 22:24:24 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:24:24 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307045132-sup-8733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1307046138-sup-6704@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 02 16:09:48 -0400 2011: > Wasted time? How so? Because _I_ don't think there is a worthwhile issue here. I spend to much time dealing with you presently, so I'm serializing tasks. > "I think the current behaviour of gar is a bad idea. But you think > it's a good idea. Therefore, no vote will happen" You set it up. You write it up. We can run it. I suspect we'll get an outcome that makes you update your scripts and we'll then move slowly forward as per usual. > Is that how things will work, in the new world order? It's not something I think we should waste time with. If you want to waste yours, that's up to you. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 3 17:46:30 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:46:30 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: <1307046138-sup-6704@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307045132-sup-8733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307046138-sup-6704@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 02 16:09:48 -0400 2011: > >> "I think the current behaviour of gar is a bad idea. But you think >> it's a good idea. ?Therefore, no vote will happen" [?] > > You set it up. ?You write it up. ?We can run it. I am willing to do that. A slight adjustment, since Dagobert just posted on the maintainers list that he changed his position on the issue(and he suggested that we proceed that way without voting): Will you now act in the way you seem to think I should act, and change *your* position? Or will you insist on having a vote? >> Is that how things will work, in the new world order? > > It's not something I think we should waste time with. ?If you want to > waste yours, that's up to you. either way, it would be beneficial to see an official notice on how things will work. ie: a writeup by "the board", on how official votes are triggered. From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Jun 3 18:52:16 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:52:16 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105041748.p44HmMF9026139@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1304650265-sup-8640@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305474909-sup-7699@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1305509630-sup-9069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307043617-sup-9241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307045132-sup-8733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307046138-sup-6704@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1307119748-sup-9344@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jun 03 11:46:30 -0400 2011: > A slight adjustment, since Dagobert just posted on the maintainers > list that he changed his position on the issue(and he suggested that > we proceed that way without voting): > Will you now act in the way you seem to think I should act, and change > *your* position? Fine. It's not worth a vote over something so dumb. I think that filename grouping is a bit more useful than searching the catalog, but still not much, imo. Either way, I can see that I'm now the minority position. > Or will you insist on having a vote? No, I value the time of all involved and wouldn't waste it on something like this. > either way, it would be beneficial to see an official notice on how > things will work. > ie: a writeup by "the board", on how official votes are triggered. Sure. Once I've cleared a few other things away I'll sit down and draft something. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Jun 5 01:35:38 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 01:35:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cswutils Message-ID: <201106042335.p54NZcgF020355@login.bo.opencsw.org> Correcting the csw-upload-pkg issue discovered earlier this week. Thanks -Ben * cswutils: minor version upgrade - from: 1.19,REV=2011.05.25 - to: 1.20,REV=2011.06.02 + cswutils-1.20,REV=2011.06.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Jun 5 01:55:24 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:55:24 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mgar In-Reply-To: <201105301914.p4UJEpn3020585@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201105301914.p4UJEpn3020585@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1307231682-sup-8316@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Mon May 30 15:14:51 -0400 2011: > Alternative and enhanced CLI frontend for GAR. > > * mgar: new package > + mgar-0.91,REV=2011.05.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz I just went to add this as a dependency for CSWgar-dev but it never got batched. Phil? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Jun 5 01:59:34 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 01:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_completion_s(...) Message-ID: <201106042359.p54NxX5g025646@login.bo.opencsw.org> Now compatible with release scripts that don't understand name changes. Thanks -Ben * git: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.7.3.2,REV=2010.11.28 - to: 1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04 + git-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + git-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + git_completion-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_cvs-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_doc-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_emacs-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_gui-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_svn-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + gitk-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * various packages: new package + git_completion_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_cvs_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_dev-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + git_dev-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + git_devel_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_doc_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_emacs_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_gui_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + git_svn_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Sun Jun 5 06:19:02 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:19:02 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cswutils In-Reply-To: <201106042335.p54NZcgF020355@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106042335.p54NZcgF020355@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Correcting the csw-upload-pkg issue discovered earlier this week. > > Thanks > -Ben > > * cswutils: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.19,REV=2011.05.25 > ?- ? to: 1.20,REV=2011.06.02 > ?+ cswutils-1.20,REV=2011.06.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Sun Jun 5 06:21:36 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:21:36 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mgar In-Reply-To: <1307231682-sup-8316@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <201105301914.p4UJEpn3020585@login.bo.opencsw.org> <1307231682-sup-8316@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Huh... odd. sorry about that. Batching. Side comment to Sebastian: the name could use some work. "Command line interface to the OpenCSW build system" isnt really helpful, since the build system is already command line ;-) Something like "convenience front end" or something might be more descriptive. But I'll batch it as is for now since folks are waiting on it. On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Mon May 30 15:14:51 -0400 2011: >> Alternative and enhanced CLI frontend for GAR. >> >> * mgar: new package >> ? + mgar-0.91,REV=2011.05.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > I just went to add this as a dependency for CSWgar-dev but it never > got batched. > > Phil? > > Thanks > -Ben > -- > Ben Walton > Systems Programmer - CHASS > University of Toronto > C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 > > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Sun Jun 5 06:35:46 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:35:46 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_completion_s(...) In-Reply-To: <201106042359.p54NxX5g025646@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106042359.p54NxX5g025646@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: phew. that was kinda ugly work. but stub naming matching helped. batched. will push batch out soon. On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > * git: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.7.3.2,REV=2010.11.28 > ?- ? to: 1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04 > ?+ git-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_completion-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_cvs-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_doc-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_emacs-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_gui-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_svn-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ gitk-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * various packages: new package > ?+ git_completion_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_cvs_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_dev-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_dev-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_devel_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_doc_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_emacs_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_gui_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ git_svn_stub-1.7.5.4,REV=2011.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Jun 5 14:57:30 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 14:57:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub Message-ID: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> Including CSWmgar as a dep. Thanks -Ben * gar_dev: revision upgrade - from: 2011.04.19 - to: 2011.06.05 + gar_dev-1.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 6 05:42:53 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:42:53 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > Including CSWmgar as a dep. > > Thanks > -Ben > > * gar_dev: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2011.04.19 > ?- ? to: 2011.06.05 > ?+ gar_dev-1.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 6 14:17:13 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:17:13 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > batched problem. ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWgar-dev. ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWgardevel. ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWmgar. From skayser at opencsw.org Mon Jun 6 14:01:30 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:01:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> * Philip Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > > batched > > problem. > > ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWgar-dev. > > ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWgardevel. > > ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWmgar. @Ben: Haven't looked into the cause for this, but could we make mgar the tip of the dependency chain? So that "pkgutil -i mgar" is what an end user triggers (think: user facing tool) and this pulls in the background dependencies via gar-dev? Sebastian From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Jun 6 14:32:20 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:32:20 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: <6679c240-2f61-4ef6-9bd1-2c7c28f34428@email.android.com> Yes, that's exactly the thought I had. We'll make mgar obsolete gar_dev. If you push that update with mgar depending on all of the things gar_dev does currently, I think that's the best path forward. Thanks -Ben Sebastian Kayser wrote: * Philip Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > > batched > > problem. > > ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWgar-dev. > > ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWgardevel. > > ERROR! Cyclic dependency detected in package CSWmgar. @Ben: Haven't looked into the cause for this, but could we make mgar the tip of the dependency chain? So that "pkgutil -i mgar" is what an end user triggers (think: user facing tool) and this pulls in the background dependencies via gar-dev? Sebastian_____________________________________________ pkgsubmissions mailing list pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Jun 6 15:09:46 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:09:46 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: <6679c240-2f61-4ef6-9bd1-2c7c28f34428@email.android.com> References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> <6679c240-2f61-4ef6-9bd1-2c7c28f34428@email.android.com> Message-ID: <1307365525-sup-6554@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Mon Jun 06 08:32:20 -0400 2011: > Yes, that's exactly the thought I had. We'll make mgar obsolete > gar_dev. If you push that update with mgar depending on all of the > things gar_dev does currently, I think that's the best path forward. I just pushed a gar_dev that drops the CSWmgar dependency to immediately resolve this problem, but as I mentioned, we should entirely deprecate CSWgar-dev now. A few docs will need an update as a result of the change. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 6 19:20:53 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:20:53 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: <1307365525-sup-6554@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> <6679c240-2f61-4ef6-9bd1-2c7c28f34428@email.android.com> <1307365525-sup-6554@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > I just pushed a gar_dev that drops the CSWmgar dependency to > immediately resolve this problem, but as I mentioned, we should > entirely deprecate CSWgar-dev now. ?A few docs will need an update as > a result of the change. > erm.... do you mean, "deprecate CSWgardevel" ? From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Jun 6 20:18:55 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:18:55 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> <6679c240-2f61-4ef6-9bd1-2c7c28f34428@email.android.com> <1307365525-sup-6554@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1307384289-sup-1146@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 06 13:20:53 -0400 2011: > > I just pushed a gar_dev that drops the CSWmgar dependency to > > immediately resolve this problem, but as I mentioned, we should > > entirely deprecate CSWgar-dev now. ?A few docs will need an update as > > a result of the change. > > > > erm.... do you mean, "deprecate CSWgardevel" ? No, I mean deprecate CSWgar-dev. The current CSWgar-dev already obsoletes/deprecated CSWgardevel. CSWmgar should now obsolete/deprecate CSWgar-dev. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 6 21:01:21 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:01:21 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev, gardevel_stub In-Reply-To: <1307384289-sup-1146@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <201106051257.p55CvUqa023310@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110606120130.GN29708@sebastiankayser.de> <6679c240-2f61-4ef6-9bd1-2c7c28f34428@email.android.com> <1307365525-sup-6554@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1307384289-sup-1146@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: huh. well, anyways, its batched. lets see if it makes it out this time... On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 06 13:20:53 -0400 2011: > >> erm.... do you mean, "deprecate CSWgardevel" ? > > No, I mean deprecate CSWgar-dev. ?The current CSWgar-dev already > obsoletes/deprecated CSWgardevel. ?CSWmgar should now > obsolete/deprecate CSWgar-dev. > From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 6 22:22:39 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:22:39 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Fwd: newpkgs libsmi2, libsmi_dev, libsmi_mibs, lib(...) References: <201105191349.p4JDnT8h005131@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, ping as I need this released before the update to Wireshark. Best regards -- Dago Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > Von: Dagobert Michelsen > Datum: 19. Mai 2011 15:49:29 MESZ > An: Release Manager > Betreff: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsmi2, libsmi_dev, libsmi_mibs, lib(...) > Antwort an: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > > Split packages > > * libsmi_mibs: revision upgrade > - from: 2009.11.25 > - to: 2011.05.19 > + libsmi_mibs-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libsmi: new package > + libsmi2-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmi2-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmi_dev-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmi_dev-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmi_stub-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmi_utils-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmi_utils-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libsmimibs_stub-0.4.8,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 6 22:42:42 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:42:42 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gpg_error, gpgerr_stub, libgpg_error0(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105170914.p4H9EYGx022896@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, as this seems to have been settled please push. Best regards -- Dago Am 17.05.2011 um 18:48 schrieb Philip Brown: > Issue with stub naming. Packages on hold, pending the maintainer list > discussion on stub naming that I just kicked off. > > please remind me about this package, if discussion results in > consensus that this naming is preferred. > > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Resubmit with adjusted stub name >> >> * gpg: new package >> + gpg_error-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + gpg_error-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + gpgerr_stub-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libgpg_error0-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libgpg_error0-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libgpg_error_dev-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libgpg_error_dev-1.10,REV=2011.05.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 6 23:16:30 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:16:30 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gpg_error, gpgerr_stub, libgpg_error0(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105170914.p4H9EYGx022896@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > as this seems to have been settled please push. > erm... yes it was settled.. but you didnt rename to match the format of how things were settled? gpgerr_stub should be libgpg_error_stub From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 6 23:18:32 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:18:32 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Fwd: newpkgs libsmi2, libsmi_dev, libsmi_mibs, lib(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201105191349.p4JDnT8h005131@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > ping as I need this released before the update to Wireshark. > same issue as gpgerr. stub needs renaming From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 7 13:00:23 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:00:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsmi2, libsmi_dev, libsmi_mibs, lib(...) Message-ID: <201106071100.p57B0NJq020856@login.bo.opencsw.org> Hi Phil, now with updated stub catalog name * libsmi_mibs: revision upgrade - from: 2009.11.25 - to: 2011.06.07 + libsmi_mibs-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libsmi: new package + libsmi2-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi2-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi_dev-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi_dev-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi_mibs_stub-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi_stub-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi_utils-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libsmi_utils-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 7 13:01:11 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:01:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs librsvg2_2, librsvg_dev, librsvg_deve(...) Message-ID: <201106071101.p57B1Buk020884@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version bump to latest version * rsvg: new package + librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_devel_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_doc-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_doc_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 7 13:02:31 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:02:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gpg_error, libgpg_error0, libgpg_erro(...) Message-ID: <201106071102.p57B2Vd6020920@login.bo.opencsw.org> Now with updated stub catalog name * gpg_error: new package + gpg_error-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + gpg_error-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgpg_error0-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgpg_error0-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgpg_error_dev-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgpg_error_dev-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgpg_error_stub-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 7 15:52:57 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libwebp0, libwebp_dev, webp Message-ID: <201106071352.p57DqvKe011764@login.bo.opencsw.org> * webp: new package + libwebp0-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libwebp0-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libwebp_dev-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libwebp_dev-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + webp-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + webp-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 7 18:08:10 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:08:10 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libsmi2, libsmi_dev, libsmi_mibs, lib(...) In-Reply-To: <201106071100.p57B0NJq020856@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106071100.p57B0NJq020856@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > now with updated stub catalog name > > * libsmi_mibs: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2009.11.25 > ?- ? to: 2011.06.07 > ?+ libsmi_mibs-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libsmi: new package > ?+ libsmi2-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi2-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi_dev-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi_dev-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi_mibs_stub-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi_stub-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi_utils-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libsmi_utils-0.4.8,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 7 18:10:26 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:10:26 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs librsvg2_2, librsvg_dev, librsvg_deve(...) In-Reply-To: <201106071101.p57B1Buk020884@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106071101.p57B1Buk020884@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Errr... you've created stub packages, for packages that dont exist? Methinks the stub creation tools need to be fixed further On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Version bump to latest version > > * rsvg: new package > ?+ librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_devel_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_doc-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_doc_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 7 18:11:27 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:11:27 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libwebp0, libwebp_dev, webp In-Reply-To: <201106071352.p57DqvKe011764@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106071352.p57DqvKe011764@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * webp: new package > ?+ libwebp0-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwebp0-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwebp_dev-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwebp_dev-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ webp-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ webp-0.1.2,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 7 18:15:21 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:15:21 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gpg_error, libgpg_error0, libgpg_erro(...) In-Reply-To: <201106071102.p57B2Vd6020920@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106071102.p57B2Vd6020920@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: thanks. batched On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Now with updated stub catalog name > > * gpg_error: new package > ?+ gpg_error-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ gpg_error-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libgpg_error0-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libgpg_error0-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libgpg_error_dev-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libgpg_error_dev-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libgpg_error_stub-1.10,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 7 18:39:46 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:39:46 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs librsvg2_2, librsvg_dev, librsvg_deve(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106071101.p57B1Buk020884@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 07.06.2011 um 18:10 schrieb Philip Brown: > Errr... you've created stub packages, for packages that dont exist? > Methinks the stub creation tools need to be fixed further Grmpf, the build recipe contained the split for the packages which I obsoleted. Looks like they were never release and I didn't double-check. Sorry for the inconvenience. New packages: * rsvg: new package + librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + librsvg_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 7 19:32:38 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:32:38 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs librsvg2_2, librsvg_dev, librsvg_deve(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106071101.p57B1Buk020884@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 07.06.2011 um 18:10 schrieb Philip Brown: >> Errr... you've created stub packages, for packages that dont exist? >> Methinks the stub creation tools need to be fixed further > > Grmpf, the build recipe contained the split for the packages which > I obsoleted. Looks like they were never release and I didn't double-check. > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > New packages: > > * rsvg: new package > ?+ librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg2_2-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_dev-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_gnome-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ librsvg_stub-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rsvg-2.34.0,REV=2011.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > > Best regards > > ?-- Dago > > -- > "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, > and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 > > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 7 20:07:33 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libwireshark0, libwiretap0, libwsutil(...) Message-ID: <201106071807.p57I7XuZ010878@login.bo.opencsw.org> * wireshark: minor version upgrade - from: 1.2.3,REV=2009.12.25 - to: 1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06 + wireshark-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + wireshark-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libw: new package + libwireshark0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libwireshark0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libwiretap0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libwiretap0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libwsutil0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libwsutil0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 7 22:47:17 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:47:17 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libwireshark0, libwiretap0, libwsutil(...) In-Reply-To: <201106071807.p57I7XuZ010878@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106071807.p57I7XuZ010878@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched. As a side comment, this seems like a rather gratuitous, unneccessary splitting out of libraries. wireshark has no current reverse deps. the libraries seem 100% internal to wireshark itself. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * wireshark: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.2.3,REV=2009.12.25 > ?- ? to: 1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06 > ?+ wireshark-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ wireshark-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libw: new package > ?+ libwireshark0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwireshark0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwiretap0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwiretap0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwsutil0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libwsutil0-1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 12:56:03 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:56:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libcairo2, libcairo_dev, libcairo_dev(...) Message-ID: <201106081056.p58Au3JY029307@login.bo.opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Version bump, 64 bit lib was not self-contained breaking pango update, general rework and split. Best regards -- Dago * libcairo: new package + libcairo2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_dev-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_dev-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_devel_stub-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_doc_stub-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_gobject2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_gobject2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_script_interpreter2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_script_interpreter2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcairo_stub-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libcairo_doc: minor version upgrade - from: 1.8.10,REV=2010.06.07 - to: 1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08 + libcairo_doc-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 13:36:21 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rsync Message-ID: <201106081136.p58BaLXW014612@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version bump, relocation of config from /etc to /etc/opt/csw * rsync: patchlevel upgrade - from: 3.0.7,REV=2010.02.17 - to: 3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08 + rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 14:41:59 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:41:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) Message-ID: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version bump, complete rework, now with AUX filter linkage * curl: minor version upgrade - from: 7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15 - to: 7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29 + curl-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libcurl3: new package + libcurl3-7.15.5,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl3-7.15.5,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libcurl2: new package + libcurl2-7.11.2,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl2-7.11.2,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * curl: new package + curl_devel_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt_full_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4_feature-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4_feature-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl_dev-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl_dev-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 20:01:33 2011 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dovecot, dovecot_devel Message-ID: <201106081801.p58I1Xs5024445@login.bo.opencsw.org> Hi Phil, updated dovecot packages are submitted to newpkgs Thanks, Jake * dovecot: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.16,REV=2011.01.15 - to: 1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08 + dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + dovecot_devel-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + dovecot_devel-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 20:38:27 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:38:27 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rsync In-Reply-To: <201106081136.p58BaLXW014612@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106081136.p58BaLXW014612@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Would you mind updating the manpages/docs to reflect this please? A quick grep shows; "The default is /etc/rsyncd.conf unless the daemon is running over ..." On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Version bump, relocation of config from /etc to /etc/opt/csw > > * rsync: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 3.0.7,REV=2010.02.17 > ?- ? to: 3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08 > ?+ rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 20:46:41 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:46:41 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libcairo2, libcairo_dev, libcairo_dev(...) In-Reply-To: <201106081056.p58Au3JY029307@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106081056.p58Au3JY029307@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched, and renamed, I think. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Version bump, 64 bit lib was not self-contained breaking pango update, > general rework and split. > > Best regards > > ?-- Dago > > * libcairo: new package > ?+ libcairo2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_dev-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_dev-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_devel_stub-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_doc_stub-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_gobject2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_gobject2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_script_interpreter2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_script_interpreter2-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libcairo_stub-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libcairo_doc: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.8.10,REV=2010.06.07 > ?- ? to: 1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08 > ?+ libcairo_doc-1.10.2,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 20:47:51 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:47:51 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dovecot, dovecot_devel In-Reply-To: <201106081801.p58I1Xs5024445@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106081801.p58I1Xs5024445@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Thanks Jake.. but you need to rename _devel to _dev now. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jake Goerzen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > ?updated dovecot packages are submitted to newpkgs > > Thanks, > Jake > > * dovecot: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.2.16,REV=2011.01.15 > ?- ? to: 1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08 > ?+ dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ dovecot_devel-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ dovecot_devel-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 20:50:41 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:50:41 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: erm.. there is no "curl_rt_full" ? On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Version bump, complete rework, now with AUX filter linkage > > * curl: new package > ?+ curl_devel_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl_rt_full_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ curl_rt_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 20:54:13 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:54:13 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 08.06.2011 um 20:50 schrieb Philip Brown: > erm.. there is no "curl_rt_full" ? Yes, I renamed all of them (and neon et al) to *-feature as it describes the contents more accurately. Best regards -- Dago > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Version bump, complete rework, now with AUX filter linkage >> >> * curl: new package >> + curl_devel_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + curl_rt_full_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + curl_rt_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 21:04:59 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:04:59 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 08.06.2011 um 20:50 schrieb Philip Brown: >> erm.. there is no "curl_rt_full" ?? > > Yes, I renamed all of them (and neon et al) to *-feature as it > describes the contents more accurately. I understand that you want to use "feature".. What I'm saying is, that you currently have in that batch, CSWcurlrtfull NAME=curl_rt_full_stub But there is no software name of "curl_rt_full" for it to be replacing, in our current catalog. Nor is there a CSWcurlrtfull From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 21:10:08 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:10:08 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 08.06.2011 um 21:04 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Am 08.06.2011 um 20:50 schrieb Philip Brown: >>> erm.. there is no "curl_rt_full" ? >> >> Yes, I renamed all of them (and neon et al) to *-feature as it >> describes the contents more accurately. > > I understand that you want to use "feature".. What I'm saying is, that > you currently have in that batch, > > CSWcurlrtfull > NAME=curl_rt_full_stub > > But there is no software name of "curl_rt_full" for it to be > replacing, in our current catalog. > Nor is there a CSWcurlrtfull The new package is CSWlibcurl4-feature where the obsoleted CSWcurlrtfull depends on it. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 21:24:47 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:24:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rsync Message-ID: <201106081924.p58JOlsY001403@login.bo.opencsw.org> Now with updated location of rsyncd.conf in manpage * rsync: patchlevel upgrade - from: 3.0.7,REV=2010.02.17 - to: 3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08 + rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 21:47:39 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:47:39 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rsync In-Reply-To: <201106081924.p58JOlsY001403@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106081924.p58JOlsY001403@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: thanks. batched. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Now with updated location of rsyncd.conf in manpage > > * rsync: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 3.0.7,REV=2010.02.17 > ?- ? to: 3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08 > ?+ rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rsync-3.0.8,REV=2011.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 21:52:54 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:52:54 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > *wave* > Am 08.06.2011 um 21:04 schrieb Philip Brown: >> CSWcurlrtfull >> NAME=curl_rt_full_stub >> >> But there is no software name of "curl_rt_full" for it to be >> replacing, in our current catalog. >> Nor is there a CSWcurlrtfull > > The new package is CSWlibcurl4-feature where the obsoleted > CSWcurlrtfull depends on it. > > Still lost here, I'm afraid. If "curl_rt_full" is not in our catalog *now*... why are you making a stub package for it? It's not even in "stable" As far as I can tell, it was never released. So it seems a mistake to generate a stub for it? From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 22:22:31 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:22:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 08.06.2011 um 21:52 schrieb Philip Brown: >> Am 08.06.2011 um 21:04 schrieb Philip Brown: >>> CSWcurlrtfull >>> NAME=curl_rt_full_stub >>> >>> But there is no software name of "curl_rt_full" for it to be >>> replacing, in our current catalog. >>> Nor is there a CSWcurlrtfull >> >> The new package is CSWlibcurl4-feature where the obsoleted >> CSWcurlrtfull depends on it. > > Still lost here, I'm afraid. > If "curl_rt_full" is not in our catalog *now*... why are you making a > stub package for it? > It's not even in "stable" > As far as I can tell, it was never released. So it seems a mistake to > generate a stub for it? Now I get you. This is indeed wrong. I worked on AUX linkage for a very long time and it looks like I prepared the split a long time ago - so long that I thought I had released it some time. Please discard the whole batch, I'll review what has been released and prepare a new one. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 8 22:24:30 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:24:30 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > > Now I get you. This is indeed wrong. I worked on AUX linkage for a very > long time and it looks like I prepared the split a long time ago - so > long that I thought I had released it some time. Please discard the > whole batch, I'll review what has been released and prepare a new one. Okay. please remember this for any future, "is a release manager helpful" discussions ;-) From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 8 22:26:39 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:26:39 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <820DB536-73BF-4F7A-88D7-16340B299477@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 08.06.2011 um 22:24 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Now I get you. This is indeed wrong. I worked on AUX linkage for a very >> long time and it looks like I prepared the split a long time ago - so >> long that I thought I had released it some time. Please discard the >> whole batch, I'll review what has been released and prepare a new one. > > Okay. > > please remember this for any future, "is a release manager helpful" > discussions ;-) I never said a release manager is not helpful, what I said is that asynchronous checks between catalog movement is more efficient :-) Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 13:05:56 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:05:56 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 08.06.2011 um 22:22 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Am 08.06.2011 um 21:52 schrieb Philip Brown: >>> Am 08.06.2011 um 21:04 schrieb Philip Brown: >>>> CSWcurlrtfull >>>> NAME=curl_rt_full_stub >>>> >>>> But there is no software name of "curl_rt_full" for it to be >>>> replacing, in our current catalog. >>>> Nor is there a CSWcurlrtfull >>> >>> The new package is CSWlibcurl4-feature where the obsoleted >>> CSWcurlrtfull depends on it. >> >> Still lost here, I'm afraid. >> If "curl_rt_full" is not in our catalog *now*... why are you making a >> stub package for it? >> It's not even in "stable" >> As far as I can tell, it was never released. So it seems a mistake to >> generate a stub for it? > > Now I get you. This is indeed wrong. I worked on AUX linkage for a very > long time and it looks like I prepared the split a long time ago - so > long that I thought I had released it some time. Please discard the > whole batch, I'll review what has been released and prepare a new one. I reviewed the build recipe. Please release all packages with the exception of curl_rt_full_stub. There are no interdependencies between the others that need fixing. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 18:16:50 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblasi0, liblasi_dev, liblasi_stub Message-ID: <201106091616.p59GGoSj017635@login.bo.opencsw.org> Rework for GraphViz. * liblasi: new package + liblasi0-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblasi0-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblasi_dev-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblasi_dev-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblasi_stub-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 18:19:17 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:19:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) Message-ID: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> Now with fixed 64 bit support and self-sufficient libraries. * pango: new package + libpango_devel_stub-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libpango_doc_stub-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + pango-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pango-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pango_dev-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pango_dev-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pango_doc-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 18:22:48 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:22:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs wireshark Message-ID: <201106091622.p59GMmMp019065@login.bo.opencsw.org> New upstream version. Phil: Please drop the old three library packages I split out, you were probably right about the lack of usefulness. Best regards -- Dago * wireshark: minor version upgrade - from: 1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06 - to: 1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09 + wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From ellson at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 18:39:58 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:39:58 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> Dago, pango-1.24.5 ??? Is pango going to be downgraded from the pango-1.28.0 thats installed now on current9s? John On 06/09/2011 12:19 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Now with fixed 64 bit support and self-sufficient libraries. > > * pango: new package > + libpango_devel_stub-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + libpango_doc_stub-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + pango-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + pango-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + pango_dev-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + pango_dev-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + pango_doc-1.24.5,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 9 19:04:29 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:04:29 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs wireshark In-Reply-To: <201106091622.p59GMmMp019065@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106091622.p59GMmMp019065@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hmm. well all right then. batched. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > New upstream version. > > Phil: Please drop the old three library packages I split out, you were > probably right about the lack of usefulness. > > > Best regards > > ?-- Dago > > > * wireshark: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06 > ?- ? to: 1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09 > ?+ wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 9 19:06:44 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:06:44 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs wireshark In-Reply-To: References: <201106091622.p59GMmMp019065@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > Hmm. > well all right then. > batched. correction. you should change the dep from CSWgpgerr to the modern one. From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 9 19:08:03 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:08:03 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 08.06.2011 um 22:22 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > >> >> Now I get you. This is indeed wrong. I worked on AUX linkage for a very >> long time and it looks like I prepared the split a long time ago - so >> long that I thought I had released it some time. Please discard the >> whole batch, I'll review what has been released and prepare a new one. > > I reviewed the build recipe. Please release all packages with the exception > of curl_rt_full_stub. There are no interdependencies between the others that > need fixing. > erm... you asked me to discard the whole batch. so I did. you'll need to reupload now :-} From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 9 19:12:41 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:12:41 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, John Ellson wrote: > Dago, > > pango-1.24.5 ??? > > > Is pango going to be downgraded from the pango-1.28.0 thats installed > now on current9s? > interesting.... I'm guessing Dago started from an old, obsolete svn directory, instead of noticing libpango.so.x now comes from libpango-1.28.0,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz which has in the *pkginfo*, OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/libpango/trunk Unfortunately, this was released before we started copying that info into our nice handydandy web database, so it is NOT shown in http://www.opencsw.org/packages/libpango/ but it is indeed in the pkginfo of the current package. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 20:18:29 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <085316E3-F2A6-4888-A8F6-96244CF1D829@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 09.06.2011 um 19:08 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 08.06.2011 um 22:22 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: >>> Now I get you. This is indeed wrong. I worked on AUX linkage for a very >>> long time and it looks like I prepared the split a long time ago - so >>> long that I thought I had released it some time. Please discard the >>> whole batch, I'll review what has been released and prepare a new one. >> >> I reviewed the build recipe. Please release all packages with the exception >> of curl_rt_full_stub. There are no interdependencies between the others that >> need fixing. > > erm... you asked me to discard the whole batch. > so I did. > you'll need to reupload now :-} No problem, done. Best regards -- Dago * curl: minor version upgrade - from: 7.20.0,REV=2010.02.15 - to: 7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29 + curl-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + curl-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libcurl3: new package + libcurl3-7.15.5,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl3-7.15.5,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libcurl2: new package + libcurl2-7.11.2,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl2-7.11.2,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * curl: new package + curl_devel_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + curl_rt_stub-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4_feature-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl4_feature-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl_dev-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcurl_dev-7.21.6,REV=2011.04.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 9 20:23:31 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:23:31 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs curl, curl_devel_stub, curl_rt_full_s(...) In-Reply-To: <085316E3-F2A6-4888-A8F6-96244CF1D829@opencsw.org> References: <201106081241.p58Cfx5w022682@login.bo.opencsw.org> <022BD0EF-743E-44B0-B2DB-4019FAF03D21@opencsw.org> <085316E3-F2A6-4888-A8F6-96244CF1D829@opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 20:34:57 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs less Message-ID: <201106091834.p59IYvj5018188@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version bump * less: major version upgrade - from: 443,REV=2011.04.12 - to: 444,REV=2011.06.09 + less-444,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + less-444,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 20:57:47 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:57:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs wireshark Message-ID: <201106091857.p59Ivl4t016223@login.bo.opencsw.org> With updated depepdency * wireshark: minor version upgrade - from: 1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06 - to: 1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09 + wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 9 21:24:36 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:24:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 09.06.2011 um 19:12 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, John Ellson wrote: >> pango-1.24.5 ??? > > interesting.... I'm guessing Dago started from an old, obsolete svn > directory, instead of noticing libpango.so.x now comes from > OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/libpango/trunk > > Unfortunately, this was released before we started copying that info > into our nice handydandy web database, so it is NOT shown in > http://www.opencsw.org/packages/libpango/ > > but it is indeed in the pkginfo of the current package. Right. Can we re-register all missing packages? New packages done: * pango: new package + libpango_devel_stub-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libpango_doc_stub-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + pango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pango_dev-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pango_dev-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pango_doc-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 10 00:04:57 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:04:57 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > > New packages done: > > * pango: new package > ?+ libpango_devel_stub-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libpango_doc_stub-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pango_dev-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pango_dev-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ pango_doc-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > Errrr.. you did this exactly opposite of what was needed? need libpango, not pango. weelll okay there is technically SOME "bin" entries. pango-view and pango-querymodules. So maybe "and". but seems like we should not just be removing "libpango". for reference, debian includes pango-view and the other, in "dev". So seems like skipping the plain "pango" would be good. From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 10 00:07:26 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:07:26 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs wireshark In-Reply-To: <201106091857.p59Ivl4t016223@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106091857.p59Ivl4t016223@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: thanks. batched On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > With updated depepdency > > * wireshark: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.4.7,REV=2011.06.06 > ?- ? to: 1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09 > ?+ wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ wireshark-1.6.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 10 00:08:42 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:08:42 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs less In-Reply-To: <201106091834.p59IYvj5018188@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106091834.p59IYvj5018188@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Version bump > > * less: major version upgrade > ?- from: 443,REV=2011.04.12 > ?- ? to: 444,REV=2011.06.09 > ?+ less-444,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ less-444,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 10 00:11:46 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:11:46 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblasi0, liblasi_dev, liblasi_stub In-Reply-To: <201106091616.p59GGoSj017635@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106091616.p59GGoSj017635@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Rework for GraphViz. > > * liblasi: new package > ?+ liblasi0-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblasi0-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblasi_dev-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblasi_dev-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblasi_stub-1.1.0,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Fri Jun 10 09:40:29 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:40:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 10.06.2011 um 00:04 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> New packages done: >> >> * pango: new package >> + libpango_devel_stub-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libpango_doc_stub-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + pango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + pango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + pango_dev-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + pango_dev-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + pango_doc-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > Errrr.. you did this exactly opposite of what was needed? I though an update to 1.28 was needed. > need libpango, not pango. > > weelll okay there is technically SOME "bin" entries. > pango-view and pango-querymodules. > So maybe "and". but seems like we should not just be removing "libpango". > > for reference, debian includes pango-view and the other, in "dev". > So seems like skipping the plain "pango" would be good. I thought about naming it "libpango", but decided against it for the following reasons: - The existing package already has the name CSWpango (although with catalogname libpango) - The upstream software name is "pango" - The binaries you already noticed. At least pango-querymodules can not be moved to *-dev because it needs to be run every time a plugin is added to register it in pango.modules, at least once on postinstall. - A library split would be really difficult and as there are lots of other things to do I decided there are more important things than this split. Do you still think I should rename? If yes, that would then be - CSWpango -> CSWlibpango1-0 - CSWpangodevel -> CSWlibpango-dev - CSWpangodoc -> CSWlibpango-doc Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Fri Jun 10 12:43:18 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:43:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs orbit2 Message-ID: <201106101043.p5AAhIGA018310@login.bo.opencsw.org> Minor version bump, now with full testsuite run * orbit2: patchlevel upgrade - from: 2.14.18,REV=2010.03.31 - to: 2.14.19,REV=2011.06.10 + orbit2-2.14.19,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + orbit2-2.14.19,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 10 17:01:30 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:01:30 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, *wave* >> for reference, debian includes pango-view and the other, ?in "dev". >> So seems like skipping the plain "pango" would be good. > > I thought about naming it "libpango", but decided against it for the following > reasons: > > - The existing package already has the name CSWpango (although with catalogname libpango) > - The upstream software name is "pango" > - The binaries you already noticed. At least pango-querymodules can not be moved > ?to *-dev because it needs to be run every time a plugin is added to register it > ?in pango.modules, at least once on postinstall. How does debian make it work then? debian has it in _dev > - A library split would be really difficult and as there are lots of other things to do > ?I decided there are more important things than this split. > In that case, I think it would be more appropriate to keep the naming exactly as it is in the currently released package. If doing the split "right" is too much trouble at the moment, then lets not do any splitting/renaming at all? (why are you rebuilding at all, btw? is something actually requiring 1.28.4 over 1.28.0 ?) > Do you still think I should rename? > > If yes, that would then be > - CSWpango -> CSWlibpango1-0 not just CSWlibpango1 ? > - CSWpangodevel -> CSWlibpango-dev > - CSWpangodoc -> CSWlibpango-doc From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Fri Jun 10 19:26:24 2011 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dovecot, dovecot_dev, dovecot_devel_stub Message-ID: <201106101726.p5AHQO5j027423@login.bo.opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Updated packages are now submitted with corrected _dev naming Thanks, Jake * dovecot_dev: new package + dovecot_dev-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + dovecot_dev-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + dovecot_devel_stub-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * dovecot: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.16,REV=2011.01.15 - to: 1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10 + dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Sat Jun 11 06:25:49 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:25:49 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs orbit2 In-Reply-To: <201106101043.p5AAhIGA018310@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106101043.p5AAhIGA018310@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Minor version bump, now with full testsuite run > > * orbit2: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 2.14.18,REV=2010.03.31 > ?- ? to: 2.14.19,REV=2011.06.10 > ?+ orbit2-2.14.19,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ orbit2-2.14.19,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Sat Jun 11 06:30:02 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:30:02 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs dovecot, dovecot_dev, dovecot_devel_stub In-Reply-To: <201106101726.p5AHQO5j027423@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106101726.p5AHQO5j027423@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: thanks. batched On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Jake Goerzen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > ?Updated packages are now submitted with corrected _dev naming > > Thanks, > Jake > > * dovecot_dev: new package > ?+ dovecot_dev-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ dovecot_dev-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ dovecot_devel_stub-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * dovecot: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.2.16,REV=2011.01.15 > ?- ? to: 1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10 > ?+ dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ dovecot-1.2.17,REV=2011.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Sat Jun 11 15:22:31 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:22:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Phil, Am 10.06.2011 um 17:01 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> for reference, debian includes pango-view and the other, in "dev". >>> So seems like skipping the plain "pango" would be good. >> >> I thought about naming it "libpango", but decided against it for the following >> reasons: >> >> - The existing package already has the name CSWpango (although with catalogname libpango) >> - The upstream software name is "pango" >> - The binaries you already noticed. At least pango-querymodules can not be moved >> to *-dev because it needs to be run every time a plugin is added to register it >> in pango.modules, at least once on postinstall. > > How does debian make it work then? debian has it in _dev I don't know, maybe the precalculate this? >> - A library split would be really difficult and as there are lots of other things to do >> I decided there are more important things than this split. > > In that case, I think it would be more appropriate to keep the naming > exactly as it is in the currently released package. > If doing the split "right" is too much trouble at the moment, then > lets not do any splitting/renaming at all? > > (why are you rebuilding at all, btw? is something actually requiring > 1.28.4 over 1.28.0 ?) Because 64 bit is broken in the current package. >> Do you still think I should rename? >> >> If yes, that would then be >> - CSWpango -> CSWlibpango1-0 > > not just CSWlibpango1 ? The library is named libpango-1.0.so.0.2800.4 So, probably even more libpango1-0-0 >> - CSWpangodevel -> CSWlibpango-dev >> - CSWpangodoc -> CSWlibpango-doc Anyway, for now I left the original names unchanged until a sane, intelligent split is done. Please release them as is for now as the currently released version breaks graphviz and a later split won't hurt. -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 966066 Jun 11 15:17 libpango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 836410 Jun 11 15:17 libpango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 43592 Jun 11 15:17 libpango_devel-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 43282 Jun 11 15:17 libpango_devel-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 278073 Jun 11 15:17 libpango_doc-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz Best regards -- Dago From phil at bolthole.com Sat Jun 11 15:41:39 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:41:39 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpango_devel_stub, libpango_doc_stu(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106091619.p59GJHoA017819@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4DF0F75E.40904@opencsw.org> <102F396E-D35F-4D00-A2F6-0B692FA22BC9@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > >> (why are you rebuilding at all, btw? is something actually requiring >> 1.28.4 over 1.28.0 ?) > > Because 64 bit is broken in the current package. it is? :( I didnt notice any bugs file on it. > >> not just CSWlibpango1 ?? > > The library is named > ?libpango-1.0.so.0.2800.4 > So, probably even more libpango1-0-0 yuk :( something tells me libpango1 is just fine. lets go with the "its okay to drop trailing .0" premise of naming ;-) > Anyway, for now I left the original names unchanged until a sane, intelligent split is > done. Please release them as is for now as the currently released version breaks > graphviz and a later split won't hurt. > > > -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?csw ? ? ? 966066 Jun 11 15:17 libpango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?csw ? ? ? 836410 Jun 11 15:17 libpango-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?csw ? ? ? ?43592 Jun 11 15:17 libpango_devel-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?csw ? ? ? ?43282 Jun 11 15:17 libpango_devel-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?csw ? ? ? 278073 Jun 11 15:17 libpango_doc-1.28.4,REV=2011.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz Okay. since this is a very important bugfix, AND its holding up other important packages, I'll batch like this. From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 14 15:30:47 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:30:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_stub, lcmsrt_st(...) Message-ID: <201106141330.p5EDUlSx007239@login.bo.opencsw.org> Rework of both liblcms 1 and 2. * py_lcms: revision upgrade - from: 2010.03.16 - to: 2011.06.14 + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * liblcms2: new package + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * lcms: new package + lcms_devel_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + lcms_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + lcmsrt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 14 15:30:59 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnetpbm10, libnetpbm_dev, netpbm Message-ID: <201106141330.p5EDUxhm007297@login.bo.opencsw.org> Full rework of netpbm * netpbm: minor version upgrade - from: 10.26.43,REV=2007.06.29 - to: 10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14 + netpbm-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + netpbm-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libnetpbm: new package + libnetpbm10-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnetpbm10-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libnetpbm_dev-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnetpbm_dev-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 14 15:36:58 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:36:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xmlstarlet Message-ID: <201106141336.p5EDawMD013411@login.bo.opencsw.org> * xmlstarlet: minor version upgrade - from: 1.1.0,REV=2011.04.20 - to: 1.2.0,REV=2011.06.01 + xmlstarlet-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xmlstarlet-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 14 15:43:33 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:43:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libscintilla2, libscintilla_dev Message-ID: <201106141343.p5EDhXE5017246@login.bo.opencsw.org> * libscintilla: new package + libscintilla2-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libscintilla2-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libscintilla_dev-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libscintilla_dev-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 14 16:34:58 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs flac, libflac++6, libflac4, libflac7, (...) Message-ID: <201106141434.p5EEYwqY005265@login.bo.opencsw.org> This is a full rework of the Xiph stuff among some related packages. Best regards -- Dago * libtheora: new package + libtheora0-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora0-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora_stub-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoradec1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoradec1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoraenc1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoraenc1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libvorbis: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.3.1,REV=2010.03.26 - to: 1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04 + libvorbis-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libogg: new package + libogg0-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libogg0-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libogg_dev-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libogg_dev-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * xmms_flac: revision upgrade - from: 2009.09.05 - to: 2011.05.05 + xmms_flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xmms_flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libflac7: new package + libflac7-1.1.2,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac7-1.1.2,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * kate: new package + libkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_dev-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_dev-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_utils-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_utils-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + py_libkate-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libxmms: new package + libxmms1-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmms1-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmms_dev-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmms_dev-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libflac4: new package + libflac4-1.0.4,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac4-1.0.4,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * xmms: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.10,REV=2004.06.28 - to: 1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14 + xmms-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xmms-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libogg: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.0,REV=2010.03.26 - to: 1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02 + libogg-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * flac: new package + flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac++6-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac++6-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac8-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac8-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac_dev-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac_dev-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac_stub-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + xmmsflac_stub-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libvorbis: new package + libvorbis0-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbis0-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbis_dev-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbis_dev-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisenc2-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisenc2-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisfile3-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisfile3-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * oggz: new package + liboggz2-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz2-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz_stub-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + oggz-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + oggz-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 14 23:46:56 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:56 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xmlstarlet In-Reply-To: <201106141336.p5EDawMD013411@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106141336.p5EDawMD013411@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * xmlstarlet: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.1.0,REV=2011.04.20 > ?- ? to: 1.2.0,REV=2011.06.01 > ?+ xmlstarlet-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ xmlstarlet-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 14 23:48:23 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:48:23 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libscintilla2, libscintilla_dev In-Reply-To: <201106141343.p5EDhXE5017246@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106141343.p5EDhXE5017246@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On 6/14/11, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * libscintilla: new package > + libscintilla2-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libscintilla2-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libscintilla_dev-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libscintilla_dev-2.26,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 14 23:51:09 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:51:09 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_stub, lcmsrt_st(...) In-Reply-To: <201106141330.p5EDUlSx007239@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106141330.p5EDUlSx007239@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Two issues: 1. why provide v1 and v2 utils? is that actually useful, or was that an oversight from providng legacy library builds? 2. the old package provides 64bit and 32bit util binaries. yours does not. ? On 6/14/11, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Rework of both liblcms 1 and 2. > > * py_lcms: revision upgrade > - from: 2010.03.16 > - to: 2011.06.14 > + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * liblcms2: new package > + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * lcms: new package > + lcms_devel_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + lcms_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + lcmsrt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 14 23:54:03 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:03 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libnetpbm10, libnetpbm_dev, netpbm In-Reply-To: <201106141330.p5EDUxhm007297@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106141330.p5EDUxhm007297@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Batched. On 6/14/11, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Full rework of netpbm > > * netpbm: minor version upgrade > - from: 10.26.43,REV=2007.06.29 > - to: 10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14 > + netpbm-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + netpbm-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libnetpbm: new package > + libnetpbm10-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libnetpbm10-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libnetpbm_dev-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libnetpbm_dev-10.35.80,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 15 09:27:58 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:27:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_stub, lcmsrt_st(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106141330.p5EDUlSx007239@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <42D0160C-D19E-4BE2-A176-7F57D94B3DCE@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 14.06.2011 um 23:51 schrieb Philip Brown: > Two issues: > > 1. why provide v1 and v2 utils? > is that actually useful, or was that an oversight from providng legacy > library builds? The versions are API incompatible and some applications require v1 and some v2. The binaries in the util packages have been named by upstream to be installable at the same time and named slightly different between v1 and v2. To use the specific color management version you have to use the matching binaries. So this means you have to have everything from both libraries. > 2. the old package provides 64bit and 32bit util binaries. yours does not. > ? This was due to the old GAR defaults when you enabled 64 bit - the newer defaults just make libraries 64 bit and put only 32 bit binaries in the package. Probably 64 bit may be useful for large images, do you think I should add these back in? Best regards -- Dago > > > On 6/14/11, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Rework of both liblcms 1 and 2. >> >> * py_lcms: revision upgrade >> - from: 2010.03.16 >> - to: 2011.06.14 >> + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> * liblcms2: new package >> + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> * lcms: new package >> + lcms_devel_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + lcms_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + lcmsrt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> -- >> Generated by submitpkg >> _______________________________________________ >> pkgsubmissions mailing list >> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions >> > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 15 14:40:49 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:40:49 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_stub, lcmsrt_st(...) In-Reply-To: <42D0160C-D19E-4BE2-A176-7F57D94B3DCE@opencsw.org> References: <201106141330.p5EDUlSx007239@login.bo.opencsw.org> <42D0160C-D19E-4BE2-A176-7F57D94B3DCE@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > .... >> 2. the old package provides 64bit and 32bit util binaries. yours does not. >> ? > > This was due to the old GAR defaults when you enabled 64 bit - the newer > defaults just make libraries 64 bit and put only 32 bit binaries in the > package. Probably 64 bit may be useful for large images, do you think I should > add these back in? > Given that color management is a "professional" concern, and that "professionals" are more likely to want to work with huge images in memory... yes I think you should. From phil at bolthole.com Wed Jun 15 21:45:26 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:45:26 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs flac, libflac++6, libflac4, libflac7, (...) In-Reply-To: <201106141434.p5EEYwqY005265@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106141434.p5EEYwqY005265@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Please break this stuff up into smaller batches. that way, everything wont get held up for one stupid thing. For example, that you have the wrong stub name for xmmsflac_stub it should be xmms_flac_stub given the prior compalints about "you should treat everything in a pkgsubmission email as one batch!" I have stopped there and not attempted to evaluate the rest of the packages mentioned below yet. On 6/14/11, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > This is a full rework of the Xiph stuff among some related packages. > > Best regards > > -- Dago > > * libtheora: new package > + libtheora0-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheora0-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheora_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheora_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheora_stub-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheoradec1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheoradec1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheoraenc1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libtheoraenc1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libvorbis: patchlevel upgrade > - from: 1.3.1,REV=2010.03.26 > - to: 1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04 > + libvorbis-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libogg: new package > + libogg0-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libogg0-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libogg_dev-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libogg_dev-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * xmms_flac: revision upgrade > - from: 2009.09.05 > - to: 2011.05.05 > + xmms_flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + xmms_flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libflac7: new package > + libflac7-1.1.2,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac7-1.1.2,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * kate: new package > + libkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libkate_dev-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libkate_dev-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libkate_utils-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libkate_utils-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liboggkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liboggkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + py_libkate-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libxmms: new package > + libxmms1-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libxmms1-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libxmms_dev-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libxmms_dev-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libflac4: new package > + libflac4-1.0.4,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac4-1.0.4,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * xmms: patchlevel upgrade > - from: 1.2.10,REV=2004.06.28 > - to: 1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14 > + xmms-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + xmms-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libogg: patchlevel upgrade > - from: 1.2.0,REV=2010.03.26 > - to: 1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02 > + libogg-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * flac: new package > + flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac++6-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac++6-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac8-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac8-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac_dev-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac_dev-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libflac_stub-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + xmmsflac_stub-1.2.1,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libvorbis: new package > + libvorbis0-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbis0-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbis_dev-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbis_dev-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbisenc2-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbisenc2-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbisfile3-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libvorbisfile3-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * oggz: new package > + liboggz2-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liboggz2-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liboggz_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + liboggz_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + liboggz_stub-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + oggz-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + oggz-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 16 09:02:55 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:02:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_stub, lcmsrt_st(...) Message-ID: <201106160702.p5G72tr9006745@login.bo.opencsw.org> New batch with 64 bit isaexec binaries * lcms: new package + lcms_devel_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + lcms_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + lcmsrt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * liblcms2: new package + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * py_lcms: revision upgrade - from: 2010.03.16 - to: 2011.06.15 + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 16 10:07:30 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:07:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs flac, libflac++6, libflac4, libflac7, (...) Message-ID: <201106160807.p5G87UL1004282@login.bo.opencsw.org> Hi Phil, I fixed the xmms_flac_stub naming. The problem with splitting is that I build all these in a larger batch and there are quite some interdependencies which I probably don't split up correctly. I would prefer if you would release all of them at the same time, I am not pressed on time. If more errors occur I'll fix them ASAP. Best regards -- Dago * libtheora: new package + libtheora0-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora0-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheora_stub-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoradec1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoradec1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoraenc1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libtheoraenc1-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libvorbis: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.3.1,REV=2010.03.26 - to: 1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04 + libvorbis-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libogg: new package + libogg0-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libogg0-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libogg_dev-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libogg_dev-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libflac7: new package + libflac7-1.1.2,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac7-1.1.2,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * kate: new package + libkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_dev-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_dev-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_utils-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libkate_utils-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggkate1-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + py_libkate-0.3.8,REV=2011.03.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libxmms: new package + libxmms1-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmms1-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmms_dev-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxmms_dev-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libflac4: new package + libflac4-1.0.4,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac4-1.0.4,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * xmms_flac: revision upgrade - from: 2009.09.05 - to: 2011.06.16 + xmms_flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xmms_flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * xmms: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.10,REV=2004.06.28 - to: 1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14 + xmms-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + xmms-1.2.11,REV=2011.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libogg: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.2.0,REV=2010.03.26 - to: 1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02 + libogg-1.2.2,REV=2011.03.02-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * flac: new package + flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + flac-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac++6-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac++6-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac8-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac8-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac_dev-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac_dev-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libflac_stub-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + xmms_flac_stub-1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * libvorbis: new package + libvorbis0-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbis0-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbis_dev-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbis_dev-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisenc2-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisenc2-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisfile3-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libvorbisfile3-1.3.2,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * oggz: new package + liboggz2-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz2-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz_dev-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liboggz_stub-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + oggz-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + oggz-1.1.1,REV=2011.05.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Thu Jun 16 14:40:43 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:40:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libao2, mpg123, mpg321 Message-ID: <201106161240.p5GCehoN022957@login.bo.opencsw.org> Updates, fixing location of libao.conf * mpg123: minor version upgrade - from: 1.10.0,REV=2010.01.13 - to: 1.13.3,REV=2011.06.16 + mpg123-1.13.3,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mpg123-1.13.3,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * libao2: revision upgrade - from: 2011.03.25 - to: 2011.06.16 + libao2-0.8.8,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libao2-0.8.8,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * mpg321: patchlevel upgrade - from: 0.2.11,REV=2010.03.10 - to: 0.2.13_2,REV=2011.06.16 + mpg321-0.2.13_2,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mpg321-0.2.13_2,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 17 01:27:51 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:27:51 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libao2, mpg123, mpg321 In-Reply-To: <201106161240.p5GCehoN022957@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106161240.p5GCehoN022957@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On 6/16/11, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Updates, fixing location of libao.conf > > * mpg123: minor version upgrade > - from: 1.10.0,REV=2010.01.13 > - to: 1.13.3,REV=2011.06.16 > + mpg123-1.13.3,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + mpg123-1.13.3,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * libao2: revision upgrade > - from: 2011.03.25 > - to: 2011.06.16 > + libao2-0.8.8,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libao2-0.8.8,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * mpg321: patchlevel upgrade > - from: 0.2.11,REV=2010.03.10 > - to: 0.2.13_2,REV=2011.06.16 > + mpg321-0.2.13_2,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + mpg321-0.2.13_2,REV=2011.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Fri Jun 17 23:20:57 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:20:57 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_stub, lcmsrt_st(...) In-Reply-To: <201106160702.p5G72tr9006745@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106160702.p5G72tr9006745@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: drat. sorry didnt notice this before: stub name mismatch. On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > ?+ lcmsrt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz From skayser at opencsw.org Sat Jun 18 15:33:34 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_crypto Message-ID: <201106181333.p5IDXYdu023334@login.bo.opencsw.org> * py_crypto: new package + py_crypto-2.3,REV=2011.06.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_crypto-2.3,REV=2011.06.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Sat Jun 18 23:46:31 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:46:31 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_crypto In-Reply-To: <201106181333.p5IDXYdu023334@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106181333.p5IDXYdu023334@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > * py_crypto: new package > ?+ py_crypto-2.3,REV=2011.06.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_crypto-2.3,REV=2011.06.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Sun Jun 19 02:14:18 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:14:18 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs flac, libflac++6, libflac4, libflac7, (...) In-Reply-To: <201106160807.p5G87UL1004282@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106160807.p5G87UL1004282@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Phil, > > I fixed the xmms_flac_stub naming. > > The problem with splitting is that I build all these in a larger > batch and there are quite some interdependencies which I probably > don't split up correctly. you are right, you didnt split them up correctly :( libxmms-flac.so is in two packages. I'm holding libflac_dev, and releasing the rest, even though you asked for the whole batch at once, because this is good stuff to get out, and you have way too many packages clogging up newpkgs :p :) please do not submit any more packages until you have fixed the outstanding issues in the already submitted ones. Dealing with the required "stub" renames and juggling, (not to mention the migration of various binaries between old and new packages in our database) is not something easy to just do, undo,redo,etc. I've spent a lot of time on this stuff now. From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 20 11:41:19 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:41:19 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs flac, libflac++6, libflac4, libflac7, (...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106160807.p5G87UL1004282@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <30924DA0-DD4D-463A-81B8-D79C2B0D76F2@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 19.06.2011 um 02:14 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> I fixed the xmms_flac_stub naming. >> >> The problem with splitting is that I build all these in a larger >> batch and there are quite some interdependencies which I probably >> don't split up correctly. > > you are right, you didnt split them up correctly :( > > libxmms-flac.so > > is in two packages. > > I'm holding libflac_dev, and releasing the rest, even though you asked > for the whole batch at once, because this is good stuff to get out, > and you have way too many packages clogging up newpkgs :p > :) I cannot reproduce this: current9s% grep libxmms-flac.so CSWlibflac-dev/pkgmap current9s% current9s% pkginfo -d . -x CSWlibflac-dev libflac_dev - Development files for libflac.so.8 (sparc) 1.2.1,REV=2011.06.16 Neither can't I find it in two other adjacent packages from the most recent batch. What files are you specifically looking at? Best would be a post to locations of files on bender so I can reproduce and fix it. > please do not submit any more packages until you have fixed the > outstanding issues in the already submitted ones. > Dealing with the required "stub" renames and juggling, (not to mention > the migration of various binaries between old and new packages in our > database) is not something easy to just do, undo,redo,etc. I've spent > a lot of time on this stuff now. Ok. Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Mon Jun 20 12:35:43 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:35:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_crypto In-Reply-To: References: <201106181333.p5IDXYdu023334@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110620103543.GD25705@sebastiankayser.de> * Philip Brown wrote: > batched This doesn't seem to have hit the mirrors yet and I am waiting for it to build dependent packages. Can you tell me when this should be available? More generally, is there a fixed period between "batched" and "pushed to master mirror" (doesn't seem to be the same) or is this an infrequent, manually triggered action? I'll add it to the release process documentation [1] then. Thanks Sebastian [1] http://wiki.opencsw.org/release-process From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 20 16:06:39 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:06:39 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_crypto In-Reply-To: <20110620103543.GD25705@sebastiankayser.de> References: <201106181333.p5IDXYdu023334@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110620103543.GD25705@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > * Philip Brown wrote: >> batched > > This doesn't seem to have hit the mirrors yet and I am waiting for it to > build dependent packages. Can you tell me when this should be available? Ah, drat. A batch job was run already, but going back to check the logs, the batch failed (usually, I check the logs , but this last one was a "kick off batch and go to sleep" thing :) so I'll kick off a clean batch run now. Hello, end of weekend! > More generally, is there a fixed period between "batched" and "pushed to > master mirror" (doesn't seem to be the same) or is this an infrequent, > manually triggered action? I'll add it to the release process > documentation [1] then. the "pushed to master mirror", is a manual action(that contains a certain amount of sanity checks embedded in it), with a usual frequency of, "the same day that something is batched". From ellson at opencsw.org Mon Jun 20 16:51:29 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:51:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs swig Message-ID: <201106201451.p5KEpTnw009670@login.bo.opencsw.org> -- Generated by submitpkg (I don't think this worked - apparently I have to move the packages in to /home/experimental/ellson first. Why??? ) From ellson at opencsw.org Mon Jun 20 16:53:34 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) Message-ID: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> Simultaneous release of ImageMagick, pstoedit, and graphviz due to library interdependncies. Hopefully, this is the last time this simultaneous release will be needed. The libraries have been split out into their own pkgs so that they can be parallel installed witholder versions in the future. Many thanks to Dagobert Michelson and Peter Felecan for their help in pulling this all together. John * imagemagick: minor version upgrade - from: 6.6.0,REV=2010.03.29_rev=9 - to: 6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4 + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * magick: new package + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.08_rev=4-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * pstoedit_dev: new package + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * various packages: new package + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * graphviz: minor version upgrade - from: 2.26.3,REV=2010.08.05 - to: 2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05 + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviz2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdoc-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgraphs-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * pstoedit_rt: revision upgrade - from: 2009.05.12 - to: 2011.06.13 + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From ellson at opencsw.org Mon Jun 20 16:56:16 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:56:16 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs swig In-Reply-To: <201106201451.p5KEpTnw009670@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106201451.p5KEpTnw009670@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4DFF5F90.8080501@opencsw.org> Please ignore this one. Mistake. On 06/20/2011 10:51 AM, John Ellson wrote: From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 20 22:35:52 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:35:52 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched From skayser at opencsw.org Tue Jun 21 11:15:14 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:15:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_paramiko Message-ID: <201106210915.p5L9FEhs011515@login.bo.opencsw.org> * py_paramiko: new package + py_paramiko-1.7.7.1,REV=2011.06.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 21 18:04:48 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:48 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_paramiko In-Reply-To: <201106210915.p5L9FEhs011515@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106210915.p5L9FEhs011515@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > * py_paramiko: new package > ?+ py_paramiko-1.7.7.1,REV=2011.06.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Jun 23 18:46:44 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:46:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev Message-ID: <201106231646.p5NGki1r006908@login.bo.opencsw.org> Dependency update. * gar_dev: revision upgrade - from: 2011.06.06 - to: 2011.06.23 + gar_dev-1.0,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 23 19:57:50 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:57:50 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gar_dev In-Reply-To: <201106231646.p5NGki1r006908@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106231646.p5NGki1r006908@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > Dependency update. > > * gar_dev: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2011.06.06 > ?- ? to: 2011.06.23 > ?+ gar_dev-1.0,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From jcraig at opencsw.org Thu Jun 23 22:09:46 2011 From: jcraig at opencsw.org (Jonathan Craig) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:09:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_log_dispatch_filerotate Message-ID: <201106232009.p5NK9kSo013438@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_log_dispatch_filerotate: new package + pm_log_dispatch_filerotate-1.19,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sat Jun 25 22:55:51 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xmlnssupp Message-ID: <201106252055.p5PKtpSw025927@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_xmlnssupp: revision upgrade - from: 2011.02.13 - to: 2011.06.25 + pm_xmlnssupp-1.11,REV=2011.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sat Jun 25 23:05:15 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:05:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_textglob Message-ID: <201106252105.p5PL5FG5009265@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_textglob: minor version upgrade - from: 0.08,REV=2011.02.13 - to: 0.09,REV=2011.06.25 + pm_textglob-0.09,REV=2011.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sat Jun 25 23:20:56 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_objaccessor Message-ID: <201106252120.p5PLKuhq029323@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_objaccessor: minor version upgrade - from: 0.38,REV=2011.02.13 - to: 0.42,REV=2011.06.25 + pm_objaccessor-0.42,REV=2011.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sat Jun 25 23:48:25 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:48:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_fcgi Message-ID: <201106252148.p5PLmPwT004157@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_fcgi: minor version upgrade - from: 0.71,REV=2011.02.13 - to: 0.73,REV=2011.06.25 + pm_fcgi-0.73,REV=2011.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_fcgi-0.73,REV=2011.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sun Jun 26 00:15:48 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_xml_atom Message-ID: <201106252215.p5PMFmZI002404@login.bo.opencsw.org> * pm_xml_atom: minor version upgrade - from: 0.37,REV=2011.02.25 - to: 0.39,REV=2011.06.26 + pm_xml_atom-0.39,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sun Jun 26 00:32:42 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:32:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_pool, commons_pool_doc Message-ID: <201106252232.p5PMWgn7017824@login.bo.opencsw.org> * commons_pool: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.5.5,REV=2011.02.19 - to: 1.5.6,REV=2011.06.26 + commons_pool-1.5.6,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + commons_pool_doc-1.5.6,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From william at wbonnet.net Sun Jun 26 00:51:20 2011 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:51:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_codec, commons_codec_doc Message-ID: <201106252251.p5PMpKbM005810@login.bo.opencsw.org> * commons_codec: minor version upgrade - from: 1.4,REV=2011.02.18 - to: 1.5,REV=2011.06.26 + commons_codec-1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + commons_codec_doc-1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From jcraig at opencsw.org Sun Jun 26 02:54:11 2011 From: jcraig at opencsw.org (Jonathan Craig) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:54:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sipcalc Message-ID: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> * sipcalc: new package + sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Sun Jun 26 16:00:58 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:00:58 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs commons_codec, commons_codec_doc In-Reply-To: <201106252251.p5PMpKbM005810@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106252251.p5PMpKbM005810@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: This, and your other commons, pm_* packages, have been batched On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:51 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > * commons_codec: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 1.4,REV=2011.02.18 > ?- ? to: 1.5,REV=2011.06.26 > ?+ commons_codec-1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ commons_codec_doc-1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Sun Jun 26 16:02:05 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:02:05 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sipcalc In-Reply-To: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Craig wrote: > * sipcalc: new package > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From markp at opencsw.org Sun Jun 26 18:29:03 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:29:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs augeas Message-ID: <201106261629.p5QGT31K027422@login.bo.opencsw.org> I've quite deliberately not broken this up into the separate libs as recommended by checkpkg - it's totally inconsistent with the way other platforms have this packaged, and frankly it'll get used as a component of puppet and that's about it. Puppet is used cross platform, and I'm more interested in keeping consistency between Solaris and Linux for the whole Puppet stack. This is important to a few large organisations [Investment Banks]. Thanks * augeas: minor version upgrade - from: 0.7.0,REV=2010.03.01 - to: 0.8.1,REV=2011.06.23 + augeas-0.8.1,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + augeas-0.8.1,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From bonivart at opencsw.org Sun Jun 26 19:19:54 2011 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:19:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs augeas In-Reply-To: <201106261629.p5QGT31K027422@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106261629.p5QGT31K027422@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > I've quite deliberately not broken this up into the separate libs as > recommended by checkpkg - it's totally inconsistent with the way other > platforms have this packaged, and frankly it'll get used as a component of > puppet and that's about it. Puppet is used cross platform, and I'm more > interested in keeping consistency between Solaris and Linux for the whole > Puppet stack. This is important to a few large organisations [Investment Banks]. In general the recommendation is sound but for some packages like you mention above it's just overcomplicated to do the split. I have a few like that as well, no biggie. /peter From phil at bolthole.com Mon Jun 27 04:15:41 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:15:41 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs augeas In-Reply-To: <201106261629.p5QGT31K027422@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106261629.p5QGT31K027422@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Mark, On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mark Phillips wrote: > I've quite deliberately not broken this up into the separate libs as > recommended by checkpkg - it's totally inconsistent with the way other > platforms have this packaged, and frankly it'll get used as a component of > puppet and that's about it. Puppet is used cross platform, and I'm more > interested in keeping consistency between Solaris and Linux for the whole > Puppet stack. fine with me, as far as those go. But I have some other questions for you. You sound like you are at least passingly familiar with augeas yourself, so hopefully you can provide some informed insight here. There are a lot of /usr/share references. Most of them are in the "test" subdirs, so could be considered non-critical. But what do you think about cleaning up the references in the manpages? and also, what is the purpose of the "dist" subtree? Is it actually functional? I'm wondering, because of files like /opt/csw/share/augeas/lenses/dist/sudoers.aug which references things like /usr/local/etc/sudoers, and /etc/sudoers, but does NOT have a corresponding /opt/csw/etc/sudoers ? You seem to have created a completely generic "ignore ALL bad file contents" override, rather than file by file, and there are many, many files that trigger "bad file contents" warnings. so Im wondering if you may have missed thinking about these files, buried in the output of all the other more trivial warnings. I pondered whether it was Dagobert, who did a quickie release of the prior package, who created that generic override? But I cant tell, because....: Oddly, this stuff does NOT seem to be in subversion. I tried to take a look in the svn tree, did a check out of pkg/augeas, and it seems virtually empty. Additionally, and possibly not coincidentally, there is indication that your package stuff was not actually committed into subversion? OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/augeas/trunk at UNCOMMITTED From markp at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 12:36:58 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:36:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppetmaster Message-ID: <201106271036.p5RAawgk026374@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version punt, that's all. * puppetmaster: patchlevel upgrade - from: 2.6.8,REV=2011.05.17 - to: 2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23 + puppetmaster-2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From markp at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 12:37:19 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:37:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppet Message-ID: <201106271037.p5RAbJeN027040@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version punt. Contains patched pkgutil provider too - this version supports '-t' in a puppet manifest, most handy. * puppet: patchlevel upgrade - from: 2.6.8,REV=2011.05.17 - to: 2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23 + puppet-2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From markp at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 12:40:20 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:40:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs augeas Message-ID: <201106271040.p5RAeKhU002689@login.bo.opencsw.org> On 27 Jun 2011, at 03:15, Philip Brown wrote: > fine with me, as far as those go. But I have some other questions for you. > You sound like you are at least passingly familiar with augeas > yourself, so hopefully you can provide some informed insight here. > There are a lot of /usr/share references. > Most of them are in the "test" subdirs, so could be considered > non-critical. But what do you think about cleaning up the references > in the manpages? > and also, what is the purpose of the "dist" subtree? Is it actually > functional? > I'm wondering, because of files like > /opt/csw/share/augeas/lenses/dist/sudoers.aug > which references things like /usr/local/etc/sudoers, and /etc/sudoers, > but does NOT have a corresponding /opt/csw/etc/sudoers ? Hi Phil, Not a problem with the questions. Augeas has 'lenses', views basically, on files on the filesystem. Those lenses are the aug files. Essentially they provide a framework that describes the contents of those files - there are lots of assume default locations for these files, hence the content warnings (and me deciding to add ignores for them, blanketly - rather like Puppet in that respect). You do raise a good point about not looking for sudoers in our standard location actually - and I think I'll do a patch to remedy that. Please, therefore, ignore this release request and I'll sort a patch for at least sudoers location and do another cut. > Additionally, and possibly not coincidentally, there is indication > that your package stuff was not actually committed into subversion? > > OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/augeas/trunk at UNCOMMITTED Hmm, should all be there. My checkout is committed... current10x:augeas$ svn info | grep URL URL: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/augeas current10x:augeas$ svn st X trunk/gar Performing status on external item at 'trunk/gar' It was probably the case that the roll that's sitting in experimental hadn't yet been committed - I tend to svn commit after I've rolled the package and installed it, testing that it at least installs properly. When I'm confident it does, it then gets committed. Hope that helps. Cheers, --Mark From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 12:41:14 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:41:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs parallel Message-ID: <201106271041.p5RAfEm0003307@login.bo.opencsw.org> * parallel: major version upgrade - from: 20110522,REV=2011.05.23 - to: 20110622,REV=2011.06.27 + parallel-20110622,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 12:46:30 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:46:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs augeas In-Reply-To: <201106271040.p5RAeKhU002689@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271040.p5RAeKhU002689@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <76FD8688-EE6F-4705-80FD-06C37A63F1F2@opencsw.org> Hi Mark, Am 27.06.2011 um 12:40 schrieb Mark Phillips: >> Additionally, and possibly not coincidentally, there is indication >> that your package stuff was not actually committed into subversion? >> >> OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/augeas/trunk at UNCOMMITTED > > Hmm, should all be there. My checkout is committed... > > current10x:augeas$ svn info | grep URL > URL: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/augeas > current10x:augeas$ svn st > X trunk/gar > > Performing status on external item at 'trunk/gar' > > It was probably the case that the roll that's sitting in experimental hadn't > yet been committed - I tend to svn commit after I've rolled the package and > installed it, testing that it at least installs properly. When I'm confident it > does, it then gets committed. > > Hope that helps. It explains what is in the package. However, the procedure you use is somewhat illegal, because the package contains a reference to the repository of the time the package was build. This makes it possible to check out the specific revision a package was built from. If you commit later this does not work. For your own testing this is not relevant, but for submission it is mandatory that everything has been checked in prior to building the package. It is sufficient to do a gmake platforms-repackage after commiting to get valid packages. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From markp at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 12:52:31 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:52:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs augeas Message-ID: <201106271052.p5RAqVVY023964@login.bo.opencsw.org> > It explains what is in the package. However, the procedure you use is > somewhat illegal, because the package contains a reference to the repository > of the time the package was build. This makes it possible to check out the > specific revision a package was built from. If you commit later this does not > work. For your own testing this is not relevant, but for submission it is > mandatory that everything has been checked in prior to building the package. > It is sufficient to do a gmake platforms-repackage after commiting to get > valid packages Hey Dago, Thanks for the clarity - not a problem, I'll adjust my workflow accordingly. Cheers, --Mark From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 14:44:41 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:44:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> Hi John, Am 20.06.2011 um 16:53 schrieb John Ellson: > Simultaneous release of ImageMagick, pstoedit, and graphviz due to library interdependncies. > > Hopefully, this is the last time this simultaneous release will be needed. The libraries have been split out into their own pkgs so that they can be parallel installed witholder versions in the future. > > Many thanks to Dagobert Michelson and Peter Felecan for their help in pulling this all together. I prepared a new set of ImageMagick packages in /home/experimental/graphviz Please release as you see fit. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 14:48:50 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:48:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ggrep Message-ID: <201106271248.p5RCmoCB006345@login.bo.opencsw.org> * ggrep: minor version upgrade - from: 2.8,REV=2011.05.16 - to: 2.9,REV=2011.06.27 + ggrep-2.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + ggrep-2.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 14:52:20 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:52:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libform5, libformw5, libmenu5, libmen(...) Message-ID: <201106271252.p5RCqKYf020639@login.bo.opencsw.org> Complete rework with latest bug fixed. * various packages: minor version upgrade - from: 5.7,REV=2010.05.21 - to: 5.9,REV=2011.06.27 + ncurses-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + ncurses-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + terminfo-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz * lib: new package + libform5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libform5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libformw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libformw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmenu5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmenu5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmenuw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmenuw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libncurses5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libncurses5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libncurses_dev-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libncurses_dev-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libncursesw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libncursesw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libpanel5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libpanel5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libpanelw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libpanelw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From ellson at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 15:16:39 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:16:39 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> On 06/27/2011 08:44 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > I prepared a new set of ImageMagick packages in /home/experimental/graphviz > Please release as you see fit. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > I'm getting errors during "submitpkg" now. I tried just "submitpkg *.gz" and it complained about not being able to execute a long rm command in /homme/newpkgs. I think the problem is that there are two conflicting files owned by you in bender:/home/newpkgs ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ ls -la image* -rw-r--r-- 1 dam staff 1175627 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam staff 1691232 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ Can you remove please? John From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 15:19:28 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:19:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi John, Am 27.06.2011 um 15:16 schrieb John Ellson: > On 06/27/2011 08:44 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> I prepared a new set of ImageMagick packages in /home/experimental/graphviz >> Please release as you see fit. > > I'm getting errors during "submitpkg" now. I tried just "submitpkg *.gz" and it complained about not being able to execute a long rm command in /homme/newpkgs. > > I think the problem is that there are two conflicting files owned by you in bender:/home/newpkgs > > ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ ls -la image* > -rw-r--r-- 1 dam staff 1175627 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 dam staff 1691232 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ > > Can you remove please? Done. These multi-maintainer bundles are somewhat hairy... Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From ellson at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 15:24:50 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:24:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, imagemagick, pstoedit Message-ID: <201106271324.p5RDOoDF004279@login.bo.opencsw.org> Retrying simultaneous release of ImageMagick, pstoedit, and graphviz due to library interdependncies. Hopefully, this is the last time this simultaneous release will be needed. The libraries have been split out into their own pkgs so that they can be parallel installed witholder versions in the future. Many thanks to Dagobert Michelson and Peter Felecan for their help in pulling this all together. John * pstoedit_dev: new package + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * various packages: new package + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * graphviz: minor version upgrade - from: 2.26.3,REV=2010.08.05 - to: 2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05 + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviz2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdoc-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgraphs-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * magick: new package + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * imagemagick: minor version upgrade - from: 6.6.0,REV=2010.03.29_rev=9 - to: 6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8 + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * pstoedit_rt: revision upgrade - from: 2009.05.12 - to: 2011.06.13 + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 15:44:22 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:44:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_rt_stub, lcms_s(...) Message-ID: <201106271344.p5RDiMKI017515@login.bo.opencsw.org> Retry with updated lcms_rt_stub catalog name. * py_lcms: revision upgrade - from: 2010.03.16 - to: 2011.06.27 + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * lcms: new package + lcms_devel_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + lcms_rt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + lcms_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * liblcms2: new package + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From ellson at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 15:51:52 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:51:52 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, imagemagick, pstoedit In-Reply-To: <201106271324.p5RDOoDF004279@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271324.p5RDOoDF004279@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4E088AF8.8080400@opencsw.org> Next problem :-( Afetr submitpkg *.gz was successful, I tried the suggested command: /opt/csw/bin/csw-upload-pkg, then because of errors I ran: ellson at login:graphviz> /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg --catalog-release unstable --os-release SunOS5.10 --architecture i386 38119f92a386367a143aa500a10e66e9 9c28d7a74b7527d53db082d7d7828ae4 5de87f89c05974e2061a82e768934d8e 0cdc12d103bc83954520600c074c6b57 366bddc01414e7a5d2ca098211b6afeb c0d80fb5d046aa26a56dc2107f52c951 afdcaff9970418e38ec5da03062a95c9 03f4c70d1c76eb944acfb1e469ee49b9 7345e6181a7236451be6e8f205227149 17b5a89473a8f405f90dd52698bb6805 919ffda68f7da2535547dd4c6c73a110 23bcbd1dee3ae85b98faec3d2aee0d6e f49f46e2a0b749341b63401fd9c7475e 257538beb96ea72727321b13040914e5 44e0473f9ffd96c1b0f55c3032bbd6e0 5c03a65941c04854bcbd892de093ed82 a2dd8a102430e07911efe6d09f83ba12 2a9fdfa73c0e22a0be5d445e70df18f2 b6d2e05bf3f403c38698bbe5c41eaddf bd3b36a02d9508b4913da257cdad16fe a8389e3267c8c41512939a545d0b8f19 640760c800eedc8f5275cf9d90a007ab 86cb60411b05f5b3449dc254771329a2 bf83654217a9b1dc5634a65c23319235 e0b4e8f727c84d0b3fedabc91adb1833 62956ddf05420f0d17efbd3b71a07f3d 48341f0bd9af655fc 6c83a63dfe4a40c INFO:root:Unwrapping candies... 100% |#################################################################################################################################################################################| INFO:root:Tasting candies one by one... Traceback (most recent call last): | File "/opt/csw/bin/checkpkg", line 179, in main() File "/opt/csw/bin/checkpkg", line 140, in main exit_code, screen_report, tags_report = check_manager.Run() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg_lib.py", line 803, in Run return super(CheckpkgManager2, self).Run() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg_lib.py", line 232, in Run errors, messages, gar_lines = self.GetAllTags(self.sqo_pkgs_list) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg_lib.py", line 760, in GetAllTags function(pkg_data, check_interface, logger=logger, messenger=messenger) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/package_checks.py", line 648, in CheckDisallowedPaths for common_path in error_mgr.GetCommonPaths(arch): File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg_lib.py", line 396, in GetCommonPaths lines.extend(self._GetPathsForArch(arch)) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg_lib.py", line 379, in _GetPathsForArch f = open(file_name, "r") IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/../../etc/commondirs-i386' ellson at login:graphviz> John On 06/27/2011 09:24 AM, John Ellson wrote: > Retrying simultaneous release of ImageMagick, pstoedit, and graphviz due to library interdependncies. > > Hopefully, this is the last time this simultaneous release will be needed. The libraries have been split out into their own pkgs so that they can be parallel installed witholder versions in the future. > > Many thanks to Dagobert Michelson and Peter Felecan for their help in pulling this all together. > > John > > > * pstoedit_dev: new package > + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * various packages: new package > + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * graphviz: minor version upgrade > - from: 2.26.3,REV=2010.08.05 > - to: 2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05 > + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphviz2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizdoc-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizgraphs-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * magick: new package > + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * imagemagick: minor version upgrade > - from: 6.6.0,REV=2010.03.29_rev=9 > - to: 6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8 > + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * pstoedit_rt: revision upgrade > - from: 2009.05.12 > - to: 2011.06.13 > + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.13-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > From skayser at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 16:00:48 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:00:48 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, imagemagick, pstoedit In-Reply-To: <4E088AF8.8080400@opencsw.org> References: <201106271324.p5RDOoDF004279@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4E088AF8.8080400@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110627140048.GA25705@sebastiankayser.de> * John Ellson wrote: > Afetr submitpkg *.gz was successful, I tried the suggested command: > /opt/csw/bin/csw-upload-pkg, then because of errors I ran: John, the csw-upload-pkg version shipped with cswutils is unfortunately buggy. Please use mgar/gar/v2/bin/csw-upload-pkg in the meantime, it works fine for me. Generally, csw-upload-pkg doesn't affect your regular package submission. It's used to test the automated release process and provide feedback to its developers. Sebastian From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 16:48:37 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:48:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs memcached Message-ID: <201106271448.p5REmbx8013499@login.bo.opencsw.org> * memcached: patchlevel upgrade - from: 1.4.3,REV=2009.11.24 - to: 1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03 + memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Jun 27 19:32:13 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:32:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> Message-ID: 2011/6/27 Dagobert Michelsen : >> I think the problem is that there are two conflicting files owned by you in bender:/home/newpkgs >> >> ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ ls -la image* >> -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?staff ? ?1175627 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> -rw-r--r-- ? 1 dam ? ? ?staff ? ?1691232 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ >> >> Can you remove please? > > Done. These multi-maintainer bundles are somewhat hairy... A thought: if files sent for release were uploaded to unstable and then read from allpkgs, this kind of permission problem would go away. Maciej From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 02:39:55 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:39:55 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppet In-Reply-To: <201106271037.p5RAbJeN027040@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271037.p5RAbJeN027040@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Mark, Unfortunately, both this,and your puppetmaster package, claim to be from "UNCOMMITTED" source. OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/puppet/trunk at UNCOMMITTED On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Version punt. Contains patched pkgutil provider too - this version supports > '-t' in a puppet manifest, most handy. > > * puppet: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 2.6.8,REV=2011.05.17 > ?- ? to: 2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23 > ?+ puppet-2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 02:40:58 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:40:58 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs parallel In-Reply-To: <201106271041.p5RAfEm0003307@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271041.p5RAfEm0003307@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * parallel: major version upgrade > ?- from: 20110522,REV=2011.05.23 > ?- ? to: 20110622,REV=2011.06.27 > ?+ parallel-20110622,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 02:42:25 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:42:25 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ggrep In-Reply-To: <201106271248.p5RCmoCB006345@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271248.p5RCmoCB006345@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * ggrep: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 2.8,REV=2011.05.16 > ?- ? to: 2.9,REV=2011.06.27 > ?+ ggrep-2.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ ggrep-2.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 02:43:42 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:43:42 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs memcached In-Reply-To: <201106271448.p5REmbx8013499@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271448.p5REmbx8013499@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * memcached: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 1.4.3,REV=2009.11.24 > ?- ? to: 1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03 > ?+ memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ memcached-1.4.5,REV=2011.03.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 03:05:44 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:05:44 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_rt_stub, lcms_s(...) In-Reply-To: <201106271344.p5RDiMKI017515@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271344.p5RDiMKI017515@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Issues in transitioning binaries, with all the renames, icc2ps location in the database messed up. Have to call it a night for now, will attempt to resolve tomorrow. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Retry with updated lcms_rt_stub catalog name. > > * py_lcms: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2010.03.16 > ?- ? to: 2011.06.27 > ?+ py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ py_lcms-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * lcms: new package > ?+ lcms_devel_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ lcms_rt_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ lcms_stub-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms1-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms_dev-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms_utils-1.19,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > * liblcms2: new package > ?+ liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms2_2-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms2_dev-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ liblcms2_utils-2.2,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From skayser at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 09:21:53 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:21:53 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sipcalc In-Reply-To: References: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110628072153.GG25705@sebastiankayser.de> * Philip Brown wrote: > batched > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Craig wrote: > > * sipcalc: new package > > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Phil, could you check whether this actually went out the door? I can't seem to find it on the mirrors (and I'd like to give it a test drive). Thanks. Sebastian From markp at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 10:25:26 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:25:26 +0100 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Test2 - please ignore Message-ID: <32BFDF0F-C0E9-497E-8766-FDAF7C36DDF1@opencsw.org> From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 12:05:03 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rl Message-ID: <201106281005.p5SA529p005647@login.bo.opencsw.org> Takeover from retired maintainer Gary Law * rl: patchlevel upgrade - from: 0.2.6,REV=2008.04.16 - to: 0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28 + rl-0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + rl-0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 13:44:32 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:44:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rl Message-ID: <201106281144.p5SBiW9p010715@login.bo.opencsw.org> * rl: patchlevel upgrade - from: 0.2.6,REV=2008.04.16 - to: 0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28 + rl-0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + rl-0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 13:48:07 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs clusterit Message-ID: <201106281148.p5SBm7Rc017888@login.bo.opencsw.org> * clusterit: revision upgrade - from: 2008.03.10 - to: 2011.06.28 + clusterit-2.5,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + clusterit-2.5,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 14:29:07 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:29:07 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sipcalc In-Reply-To: <20110628072153.GG25705@sebastiankayser.de> References: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110628072153.GG25705@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > * Philip Brown wrote: >> batched >> >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Craig wrote: >> > * sipcalc: new package >> > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > Phil, could you check whether this actually went out the door?\ It did not. If you scan through the other messages on the release list, you should find where I ran into problems with the database. I'll need to sort that out later today, before things continue. That being said, it would be fine to have it "manually" installed on any machine you like, at this point. From ellson at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 15:03:06 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:03:06 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> Yes, well, I tried, but pstoedit fails multiple checks, so the upload didn't succeed. Dago assured me that the checks were minor issues and that the submitpkg should be ok. I haven't heard from Phil yet if that is actually so. John On 06/27/2011 01:32 PM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > 2011/6/27 Dagobert Michelsen: >>> I think the problem is that there are two conflicting files owned by you in bender:/home/newpkgs >>> >>> ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ ls -la image* >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dam staff 1175627 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dam staff 1691232 Jun 27 14:54 imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >>> ellson at bender:/home/newpkgs$ >>> >>> Can you remove please? >> >> Done. These multi-maintainer bundles are somewhat hairy... > > A thought: if files sent for release were uploaded to unstable and > then read from allpkgs, this kind of permission problem would go away. > > Maciej > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions From bonivart at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 15:12:28 2011 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:12:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, John Ellson wrote: > Dago assured me that the checks were minor issues and that the submitpkg > should be ok. My guess is that Peter Felecan has not used GAR to build pstoedit and therefor has not inserted the needed overrides to pass checkpkg. /peter From skayser at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 16:35:34 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:35:34 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sipcalc In-Reply-To: References: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110628072153.GG25705@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: <20110628143534.GI25705@sebastiankayser.de> * Philip Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > > * Philip Brown wrote: > >> batched > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Craig wrote: > >> > * sipcalc: new package > >> > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > >> > ?+ sipcalc-1.1.5,REV=2011.06.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > > > Phil, could you check whether this actually went out the door?\ > > It did not. If you scan through the other messages on the release > list, you should find where I ran into problems with the database. > I'll need to sort that out later today, before things continue. Thanks for info. Wasn't aware of the general issues. This would be a good dashboard item for the automated release process btw.: a prominent indicator whether the release workflow is humming along nicely or whether it's on hold for some reason. > That being said, it would be fine to have it "manually" installed on > any machine you like, at this point. Yup, will do. Thanks. Sebastian From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 17:24:06 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:24:06 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lcms_devel_stub, lcms_rt_stub, lcms_s(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106271344.p5RDiMKI017515@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Okay. I think i've got it all straightened out now. phew :( batching. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > Issues in transitioning binaries, with all the renames, > icc2ps location in the database messed up. > Have to call it a night for now, will attempt to resolve tomorrow. > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 17:37:33 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:37:33 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs clusterit In-Reply-To: <201106281148.p5SBm7Rc017888@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106281148.p5SBm7Rc017888@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * clusterit: revision upgrade > ?- from: 2008.03.10 > ?- ? to: 2011.06.28 > ?+ clusterit-2.5,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ clusterit-2.5,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 17:38:39 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:38:39 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rl In-Reply-To: <201106281144.p5SBiW9p010715@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106281144.p5SBiW9p010715@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: batched On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > * rl: patchlevel upgrade > ?- from: 0.2.6,REV=2008.04.16 > ?- ? to: 0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28 > ?+ rl-0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ rl-0.2.7,REV=2011.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 17:36:25 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:36:25 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:03 AM, John Ellson wrote: > Yes, well, I tried, but pstoedit fails multiple checks, so the upload didn't > succeed. > > Dago assured me that the checks were minor issues and that the submitpkg > should be ok. ? ?I haven't heard from Phil yet if that is actually so. > there is one trivial reference to /usr/local in pstoedit_dev docs. looks fine to me otherwise. SO... is the new stuff, officially in newpkgs now? everything needed, there and ready to go? From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 17:46:08 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:46:08 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1BA7E812-460C-4B95-8750-C56E8F25AB77@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 28.06.2011 um 17:36 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:03 AM, John Ellson wrote: >> Yes, well, I tried, but pstoedit fails multiple checks, so the upload didn't >> succeed. >> >> Dago assured me that the checks were minor issues and that the submitpkg >> should be ok. I haven't heard from Phil yet if that is actually so. > > there is one trivial reference to /usr/local in pstoedit_dev docs. > > looks fine to me otherwise. > > SO... is the new stuff, officially in newpkgs now? everything needed, > there and ready to go? I think so :-) Please go ahead. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 17:47:48 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:47:48 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libform5, libformw5, libmenu5, libmen(...) In-Reply-To: <201106271252.p5RCqKYf020639@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106271252.p5RCqKYf020639@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Side comment: the automatic(?) creation of the DESC field, should be improved. desc='A free software emulation of curses, libmenu.so.5' ? does not make much sense. in my opinion, split-outs for libraries, it should be linked to the "software name" of the top level package, not the description of the top level packages. Kinda like perl? So, desc=ncurses, libmenu.so.5 ? But, batched. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Complete rework with latest bug fixed. > > * various packages: minor version upgrade > ?- from: 5.7,REV=2010.05.21 > ?- ? to: 5.9,REV=2011.06.27 > ?+ ncurses-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ ncurses-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ terminfo-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > * lib: new package > ?+ libform5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libform5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libformw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libformw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libmenu5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libmenu5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libmenuw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libmenuw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libncurses5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libncurses5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libncurses_dev-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libncurses_dev-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libncursesw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libncursesw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libpanel5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libpanel5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libpanelw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > ?+ libpanelw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 17:49:54 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:49:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libform5, libformw5, libmenu5, libmen(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106271252.p5RCqKYf020639@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <45033D66-755D-48CC-89FA-F37747AA81E6@opencsw.org> Hi Phil, Am 28.06.2011 um 17:47 schrieb Philip Brown: > Side comment: the automatic(?) creation of the DESC field, should be improved. It is manual, I couldn't think of something smarter... > desc='A free software emulation of curses, libmenu.so.5' > > ? does not make much sense. in my opinion, split-outs for libraries, > it should be linked to the "software name" of the top level package, > not the description of the top level packages. Kinda like perl? > So, > > desc=ncurses, libmenu.so.5 > > ? Don't know if that is really better... Best regards -- Dago > > But, batched. > > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Complete rework with latest bug fixed. >> >> * various packages: minor version upgrade >> - from: 5.7,REV=2010.05.21 >> - to: 5.9,REV=2011.06.27 >> + ncurses-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + ncurses-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + terminfo-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> * lib: new package >> + libform5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libform5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libformw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libformw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libmenu5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libmenu5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libmenuw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libmenuw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libncurses5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libncurses5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libncurses_dev-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libncurses_dev-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libncursesw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libncursesw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libpanel5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libpanel5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libpanelw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> + libpanelw5-5.9,REV=2011.06.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> -- >> Generated by submitpkg >> _______________________________________________ >> pkgsubmissions mailing list >> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions >> > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 17:28:00 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:28:00 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sipcalc In-Reply-To: <20110628143534.GI25705@sebastiankayser.de> References: <201106260054.p5Q0sBnC004644@login.bo.opencsw.org> <20110628072153.GG25705@sebastiankayser.de> <20110628143534.GI25705@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > > Thanks for info. Wasn't aware of the general issues. > > This would be a good dashboard item for the automated release process > btw.: a prominent indicator whether the release workflow is humming > along nicely or whether it's on hold for some reason. Yup. anyone keeping track of these somewhere? :) things I can think of: 1. general status of system 2. packages queued for current, with extended status of: i) bug/no-release-bug status ii) reviewed/not reviews iii)days until migration to current Hmmm... I'm thinking "days until migration" may be best as a counter of "days since bugfree", rather than "days since originally queued". That way, it avoids abuse by sneaky-closing bugs From ellson at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 17:50:35 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:50:35 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4E09F84B.2020107@opencsw.org> On 06/28/2011 11:36 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:03 AM, John Ellson wrote: >> Yes, well, I tried, but pstoedit fails multiple checks, so the upload didn't >> succeed. >> >> Dago assured me that the checks were minor issues and that the submitpkg >> should be ok. I haven't heard from Phil yet if that is actually so. >> > > there is one trivial reference to /usr/local in pstoedit_dev docs. > > looks fine to me otherwise. > > SO... is the new stuff, officially in newpkgs now? everything needed, > there and ready to go? Thats the best we've got, so yes please. I'll be coming back to graphviz shortly to work on the 64bit version, but this will now be without the codependencies on Imagemagic and pstoedit. Thanks John From phil at bolthole.com Tue Jun 28 22:19:02 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:19:02 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <4E09F84B.2020107@opencsw.org> References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> <4E09F84B.2020107@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Errr.. we seem to be missing a "pstoedit" top level package. interestingly, the "pstoedit_dev" package, contains /opt/csw/bin/pstoedit which was formerly in the top level pstoedit package. What is the best way to proceed here? From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jun 28 22:52:26 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:52:26 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106201453.p5KErYde013727@login.bo.opencsw.org> <09E60922-67A5-4519-ACD6-FFEBF8966EC3@opencsw.org> <4E0882B7.1020008@opencsw.org> <4E09D10A.8010101@opencsw.org> <4E09F84B.2020107@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <94681983-65CC-4140-B180-72664A1B51FF@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 28.06.2011 um 22:19 schrieb Philip Brown: > Errr.. we seem to be missing a "pstoedit" top level package. > > interestingly, the "pstoedit_dev" package, contains > /opt/csw/bin/pstoedit > > which was formerly in the top level pstoedit package. > > What is the best way to proceed here? Peter: Would you mind respinning it? If you want I can help in getting you started with GAR as the package is not too difficult :-) Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 13:15:16 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:15:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mtools Message-ID: <201106291115.p5TBFG48006266@login.bo.opencsw.org> * mtools: patchlevel upgrade - from: 4.0.16,REV=2011.04.20 - to: 4.0.17,REV=2011.06.29 + mtools-4.0.17,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + mtools-4.0.17,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 14:16:56 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libksba8, libksba_dev, libksba_stub Message-ID: <201106291216.p5TCGuSJ019158@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version bump and packages plit * libksba: new package + libksba8-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libksba8-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libksba_dev-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libksba_dev-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libksba_stub-1.2.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 14:28:05 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:28:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libhogweed2, libnettle4, libnettle_de(...) Message-ID: <201106291228.p5TCS5EG008945@login.bo.opencsw.org> Version bump and split * lib: new package + libnettle4-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnettle4-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libnettle_dev-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnettle_dev-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libnettle_utils-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libnettle_utils-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libhogweed2-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libhogweed2-2.1,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 17:34:59 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libassuan0, libassuan_dev, libassuan_stub Message-ID: <201106291534.p5TFYxEu016345@login.bo.opencsw.org> * libassuan: new package + libassuan0-2.0.2,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libassuan0-2.0.2,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libassuan_dev-2.0.2,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libassuan_dev-2.0.2,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libassuan_stub-2.0.2,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 17:35:06 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libgcrypt11, libgcrypt_dev, libgcrypt(...) Message-ID: <201106291535.p5TFZ61x016383@login.bo.opencsw.org> * libgcrypt: new package + libgcrypt11-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgcrypt11-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgcrypt_dev-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgcrypt_dev-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgcrypt_stub-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + libgcrypt_utils-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgcrypt_utils-1.5.0,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 17:39:47 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:39:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gtar Message-ID: <201106291539.p5TFdl4o018626@login.bo.opencsw.org> Now works on Solaris 10 even when compiled on Solaris 9 * gtar: minor version upgrade - from: 1.23,REV=2010.11.15 - to: 1.26,REV=2011.06.29 + gtar-1.26,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + gtar-1.26,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From markp at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 19:18:09 2011 From: markp at opencsw.org (Mark Phillips) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:18:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppet Message-ID: <201106291718.p5THI9Tx016680@login.bo.opencsw.org> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Philip Brown wrote: Hi Mark, > Unfortunately, both this,and your puppetmaster package, claim to be from > "UNCOMMITTED" source. OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/puppet/trunk at UNCOMMITTED Hey Phil, A hangover from my working practices as explained a couple of days ago - I have, up until Dago pointing out the way we prefer to work, tended to do all the work necessary to package up, test the package out, then commit to SVN when I'm confident it's ok. I can assure you it is committed as a tag... current10x:tags$ svn info | grep ^URL URL: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/puppet/tags current10x:tags$ ls -ld *2.6.9* drwxr-xr-x 5 markp csw 7 Jun 28 10:06 puppet-2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23 I can re-roll this if you want to be pedantic about it. Regards, --Mark From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 21:38:03 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:38:03 +0200 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs puppet In-Reply-To: <201106291718.p5THI9Tx016680@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106291718.p5THI9Tx016680@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <8EFD88B6-6848-4D4C-8FD2-FCD837A096EF@opencsw.org> Hi Mark, Am 29.06.2011 um 19:18 schrieb Mark Phillips: >> Unfortunately, both this,and your puppetmaster package, claim to be from >> "UNCOMMITTED" source. > > OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/puppet/trunk at UNCOMMITTED > > A hangover from my working practices as explained a couple of days ago - I > have, up until Dago pointing out the way we prefer to work, tended to do all > the work necessary to package up, test the package out, then commit to SVN when > I'm confident it's ok. > > I can assure you it is committed as a tag... > > current10x:tags$ svn info | grep ^URL > URL: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/puppet/tags > current10x:tags$ ls -ld *2.6.9* > drwxr-xr-x 5 markp csw 7 Jun 28 10:06 puppet-2.6.9,REV=2011.06.23 > > I can re-roll this if you want to be pedantic about it. It is not about Phil being pedantic, it is because the released packages are automatically processed and the repository link with the version is extracted and linked on the webpage. When packages with uncommitted repository links are released it breaks the weblinks. A respin is therefore mandatory. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From ellson at opencsw.org Wed Jun 29 22:24:44 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) Message-ID: <201106292024.p5TKOi1P008545@login.bo.opencsw.org> graphviz + imagemagick + pstoedit re-submitted with updated pstoedit John * various packages: new package + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizruby-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcdt5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libcgraph6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgraph5-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvc6-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libgvpr2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libpathplan4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libxdot4-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * pstoedit: revision upgrade - from: 2009.05.12 - to: 2011.06.29 + pstoedit-3.45,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit-3.45,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_rt-3.45,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * graphviz: minor version upgrade - from: 2.26.3,REV=2010.08.05 - to: 2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05 + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviz-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviz2-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdevel-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizdoc-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgd-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizgraphs-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizguile-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizperl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizpython-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphvizsharp-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + graphviztcl-2.28.0,REV=2011.06.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * magick: new package + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + imagemagick_dev-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagick++4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickcore4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + libmagickwand4-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pm_image_magick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * imagemagick: minor version upgrade - from: 6.6.0,REV=2010.03.29_rev=9 - to: 6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8 + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + imagemagick-6.7.0,REV=2011.06.27_rev=8-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz * pstoedit_dev: new package + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz + pstoedit_dev-3.45,REV=2011.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -- Generated by submitpkg From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 30 00:11:16 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:11:16 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <201106292024.p5TKOi1P008545@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201106292024.p5TKOi1P008545@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Ellson wrote: > graphviz + imagemagick + pstoedit > > re-submitted with updated pstoedit THanks. finally got this into the pipeline cleanly now :) From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 30 01:21:05 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:21:05 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106292024.p5TKOi1P008545@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Ellson wrote: >> graphviz + imagemagick + pstoedit >> >> re-submitted with updated pstoedit > > > THanks. ?finally got this into the pipeline cleanly now :) Sigh. Please note that "pipelines" have both an "in" and an "out" side. It got put "in", but failed to exit on the "out" side. The final "hey publish this" step exited with a complaint that the catalog was invalid. because, ERROR! Dependency CSWlibiconv2 of package CSWpstoeditrt is missing. This bloated conglomeration is holding up enough things. At this point, I would suggest that we simply temporarily remove pstoedit* from the catalog and archive, and push the rest. In theory, people who have the package already installed, will not suffer any ill effects. The only negative is that people who want to install it ,will not be able to, until the new packages are cleanly added. Otherwise.. our internal master catalog is now in unusable state, so once again, no other packages can be pushed until this is resolved one way or another. From ellson at opencsw.org Thu Jun 30 01:32:43 2011 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:32:43 -0400 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: References: <201106292024.p5TKOi1P008545@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4E0BB61B.7080709@opencsw.org> On 06/29/2011 07:21 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Ellson wrote: >>> graphviz + imagemagick + pstoedit >>> >>> re-submitted with updated pstoedit >> >> >> THanks. finally got this into the pipeline cleanly now :) > > Sigh. > Please note that "pipelines" have both an "in" and an "out" side. > It got put "in", but failed to exit on the "out" side. The final "hey > publish this" step exited with a complaint that the catalog was > invalid. because, > > ERROR! Dependency CSWlibiconv2 of package CSWpstoeditrt is missing. > > This bloated conglomeration is holding up enough things. At this > point, I would suggest that we simply temporarily remove pstoedit* > from the catalog and archive, and push the rest. OK with me, but I wonder if upgrading to the new graphviz+imagemagick won't actually break existing pstoedit installations? I do think it would be easier for Peter to rework pstoedit if he didn't have to release it with graphviz. John > > In theory, people who have the package already installed, will not > suffer any ill effects. > The only negative is that people who want to install it ,will not be > able to, until the new packages are cleanly added. > > > Otherwise.. our internal master catalog is now in unusable state, so > once again, no other packages can be pushed until this is resolved one > way or another. > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > From phil at bolthole.com Thu Jun 30 01:53:12 2011 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:53:12 -0700 Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...) In-Reply-To: <4E0BB61B.7080709@opencsw.org> References: <201106292024.p5TKOi1P008545@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4E0BB61B.7080709@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:32 PM, John Ellson wrote: > On 06/29/2011 07:21 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > >> This bloated conglomeration is holding up enough things. At this >> point, I would suggest that we simply temporarily remove pstoedit* >> from the catalog and archive, and push the rest. >... >> In theory, people who have the package already installed, will not >> suffer any ill effects. >> The only negative is that people who want to install it ,will not be >> able to, until the new packages are cleanly added. > OK with me, but I wonder if upgrading to the new graphviz+imagemagick won't > actually break existing pstoedit installations? oops. you are right I forgot about that. I was thinking only if they try to do an update specifically of pstoedit. but if they did a general update, that would break an existing pstoedit installation. drat. > I do think it would be easier for Peter to rework pstoedit if he didn't have > to release it with graphviz. well I dont know that he "has to". thats his call. but the problem is only a minor change to fix. no recompilation required.