[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs graphviz, graphviz2, graphvizdevel, g(...)

John Ellson ellson at opencsw.org
Thu Jun 30 01:32:43 CEST 2011

On 06/29/2011 07:21 PM, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Philip Brown<phil at bolthole.com>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Ellson<ellson at opencsw.org>  wrote:
>>> graphviz + imagemagick + pstoedit
>>> re-submitted with updated pstoedit
>> THanks.  finally got this into the pipeline cleanly now :)
> Sigh.
> Please note that "pipelines" have both an "in" and an "out" side.
> It got put "in", but failed to exit on the "out" side. The final "hey
> publish this" step exited with a complaint that the catalog was
> invalid. because,
> ERROR! Dependency CSWlibiconv2 of package CSWpstoeditrt is missing.
> This bloated conglomeration is holding up enough things. At this
> point, I would suggest that we simply temporarily remove pstoedit*
> from the catalog and archive, and push the rest.

OK with me, but I wonder if upgrading to the new graphviz+imagemagick 
won't actually break existing pstoedit installations?

I do think it would be easier for Peter to rework pstoedit if he didn't 
have to release it with graphviz.


> In theory, people who have the package already installed, will not
> suffer any ill effects.
> The only negative is that people who want to install it ,will not be
> able to, until the new packages are cleanly added.
> Otherwise.. our internal master catalog is now in unusable state, so
> once again, no other packages can be pushed until this is resolved one
> way or another.
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions

More information about the pkgsubmissions mailing list