[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libhistory4, libhistory5, libhistory6(...)

[Ben Walton]

Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Mon Mar 14 14:09:01 -0400 2011:

Hi Dago,

> What I find problematic here is that we have CSWlibfoo-utils for
> binaries related to libfoo. I find it consistent to have a similar
> CSWlibfoo-dev then.

As someone going to install this stuff though, I think I'd still be
looking for CSWfoo-utils (at least in the case of readline, anyway).
I'm looking at a debian box though and I see the same split you're
describing for -dev...I don't see the -utils package at all though.

(Also, they do lump libhistory and libreadline together for each
version.  I still think independent is better on that front
personally.)

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302