[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs berkeleydb3, berkeleydb3_dev, berkele(...)

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Phil,

Am 04.05.2011 um 19:14 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> 2. you didnt do the "new" one correctly.
>>> 
>>> CSWbdb3-doc 1 9078
>>> NAME=berkeleydb3_doc - BerkeleyDB 3.3 documentation
>>> 
>>> surely that should be
>>> 
>>> CSWberkeleydb3-doc
>> 
>> Umh, no. All other packages have the prefix CSWbdb3-*
> 
> but if you're going through all this trouble to "rename" everything,
> then shouldnt you fix the naming here also? We're supposed to have
> congruence between catalog name and PKG name now arent we?
> 
>> This having said, the idea was to just fix the bug I wrote about.
> 
> if you're "just fixing the bug", then "just fix the bug".
> 
> If you're renaming and stubbing, then you're not "just fixing the bug".
> consistency please.

Yeah. Right. Then just take then what I have submitted two month ago.

Am 07.03.2011 um 22:55 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> Am 07.03.2011 um 21:28 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> Errr.... now I'm confused.
>>> 
>>> Didnt we just go through a bunch of hassle to "standardize" suffixes
>>> for devel -> dev?
>>> but you're submitting _devel ?
>> 
>> I have not changed a thing apart from the dependency to CSWtcl as reported
>> in #4708. One of the faults of the past was to change too many things at
>> the same time. A general overhault will be done for release "dublin".
> 
> Gaaaahhhh....
> sorry, it doesnt work that way.
> You, and others just voted for,
> "Our new, OFFICIAL, standard is _dev."
> 
> not "_dev or _devel".
> 
> _dev.
> Only.
> 
> Official Standard.
> 
> So just as I couldnt accept _dev before... now I can no longer accept _devel.