From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Mon Aug  2 07:53:22 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:53:22 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20040802055322.GA19748@colnet>

On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:45:02PM -0400, Philip Brown wrote:
> Attached is the summary of changed or added packages for the last week
...
> firefox - mozilla.org browser

Am curious: I couldn't find firefox on any of the mirrors.
I realize it is relatively new, but while I'm posting, I've been
looking for the squirrelmail pkg for months now without success.  

What's going on with these packages?

Thanks,
Rob


From asmoore at edge.net  Mon Aug  2 13:33:11 2004
From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:33:11 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802055322.GA19748@colnet>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet>
Message-ID: <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:53:22 -0400
Robert Stampfli <csw at colnet.cboh.org> wrote:

> Am curious: I couldn't find firefox on any of the mirrors.

It is at the ibiblio mirror.  The other mirrors should sync within the
next 48 hours.

> I realize it is relatively new, but while I'm posting, I've been
> looking for the squirrelmail pkg for months now without success.  

I do not see that on the 'Packages requested so far:' page.  Does
squirrelmail go by another name?  That said, having it listed does not
guarantee a pkg will be built.  Someone has to want to package it. 
Actually, that was how I got involved as a maintainer.  I wanted a
particular mua program and was subsequently challenged to build it :>

Alex


From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Mon Aug  2 15:47:46 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:47:46 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet> <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
Message-ID: <20040802134745.GA20197@colnet>

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 06:33:11AM -0500, Alex S Moore wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:53:22 -0400
> Robert Stampfli <csw at colnet.cboh.org> wrote:
> 
> > Am curious: I couldn't find firefox on any of the mirrors.
> 
> It is at the ibiblio mirror.  The other mirrors should sync within the
> next 48 hours.

So it is.  Thanks.

> > I realize it is relatively new, but while I'm posting, I've been
> > looking for the squirrelmail pkg for months now without success.  
> 
> I do not see that on the 'Packages requested so far:' page.  Does
> squirrelmail go by another name?  That said, having it listed does not
> guarantee a pkg will be built.  Someone has to want to package it. 
> Actually, that was how I got involved as a maintainer.  I wanted a
> particular mua program and was subsequently challenged to build it :>

It's listed in packages.php as "squirrelm".  It certainly *looks*
like it has been built.  Andre Dalle is the maintainer.  Perhaps
something fell through the cracks.  (I needed it, but it wasn't
too hard just to pull down and install from scratch, so I haven't
pursued it with you all.)

Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
am looking forward to trying it out!

Rob


From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Mon Aug  2 20:27:58 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:27:58 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802134745.GA20197@colnet>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet> <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
	<20040802134745.GA20197@colnet>
Message-ID: <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
> am looking forward to trying it out!

One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:

-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*

in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
-R path specified.

As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.

First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".

Rob


From sloewenthal at gemini.edu  Mon Aug  2 20:41:03 2004
From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:41:03 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>
Message-ID: <AOEOIBDLMPAFMBPDBDNOEEBADBAA.sloewenthal@gemini.edu>

Hi Rob,

> First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
> any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
> Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".


I thought this when I first started using Firefox.  Seems that Firefox comes
in a barebones format, but if you go to forefox.org then you can download
all the functionality that should come with it.  Still, i changed bacl to
using Mozilla.

S.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org]On Behalf Of Robert Stampfli
Sent: 02 August 2004 14:28
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary


On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
> am looking forward to trying it out!

One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:

-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*

in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
-R path specified.

As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.

First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".

Rob
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004



From sloewenthal at gemini.edu  Mon Aug  2 21:12:44 2004
From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:12:44 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <AOEOIBDLMPAFMBPDBDNOEEBADBAA.sloewenthal@gemini.edu>
Message-ID: <AOEOIBDLMPAFMBPDBDNOKEBBDBAA.sloewenthal@gemini.edu>

Rob,

http://update.mozilla.org/ , and not forefix.org as I mistyped earlier.



-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org]On Behalf Of LOEWENTHAL Simon
Sent: 02 August 2004 14:41
To: questions and discussions
Subject: RE: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary


Hi Rob,

> First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
> any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
> Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".


I thought this when I first started using Firefox.  Seems that Firefox comes
in a barebones format, but if you go to forefox.org then you can download
all the functionality that should come with it.  Still, i changed bacl to
using Mozilla.

S.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org]On Behalf Of Robert Stampfli
Sent: 02 August 2004 14:28
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary


On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
> am looking forward to trying it out!

One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:

-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*

in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
-R path specified.

As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.

First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".

Rob
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004



From Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM  Mon Aug  2 22:16:31 2004
From: Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM (Thomas Jordan)
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 14:16:31 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet> <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
	<20040802134745.GA20197@colnet> <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>
Message-ID: <410EA11F.1090901@Sun.Com>

thanks... It was all compiled with the same options, but let me go peek 
and see what I can come up with.  Thanks for the feedback.


Robert Stampfli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> 
>>Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
>>am looking forward to trying it out!
> 
> 
> One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
> I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
> not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:
> 
> -rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*
> 
> in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
> does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
> I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
> -R path specified.
> 
> As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.
> 
> First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
> any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
> Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".
> 
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Fri Aug  6 15:38:39 2004
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] cfengine 2.1.8 released with (note
	this on upgrade)
In-Reply-To: <20040806091119.GI15320@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <20040806091119.GI15320@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408060937140.932@blastwave>


> This are some known mutex problems which appear only on platforms which
> *haven't* *full and current* POSIX threads support (solaris doesn't).

Really?  I thought that Solaris was POSIX compliant and mt safe
everywhere.  I must be mislead.  I think I will pull my books off the
shelf that I have here and check the standards.

+--------------------+---------------------------------------+
|  Dennis Clarke     |  Director and Admin for blastwave.org |
|   dclarke          |  Community Software Packages for      |
|     @blastwave.org |  The Solaris Operating Environment    |
+--------------------+---------------------------------------+


From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de  Fri Aug  6 16:16:52 2004
From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:16:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] cfengine 2.1.8 released with (note
	this on upgrade)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408060937140.932@blastwave>
References: <20040806091119.GI15320@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0408060937140.932@blastwave>
Message-ID: <20040806141652.GJ22341@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

Hello Dennis,

> > This are some known mutex problems which appear only on platforms which
> > *haven't* *full and current* POSIX threads support (solaris doesn't).

> Really?  I thought that Solaris was POSIX compliant and mt safe
> everywhere.  I must be mislead.  I think I will pull my books off the
> shelf that I have here and check the standards.

I have no idea, I was just quoting. But you could ask Mark Burgess
<mark at iu.hio.no>.

Sincerely,
	Thomas


From kenmays at blastwave.org  Sat Aug  7 17:26:09 2004
From: kenmays at blastwave.org (Ken Mays)
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] cfengine 2.1.8 released with (note
	this on upgrade)
Message-ID: <200408071526.i77FQ9o05354@blastwave.org>

Hey...any increase in memory on apollo or what is the ETA on the **new*** apollo?
Ken


From daniel at dseichter.de  Sun Aug  8 09:45:57 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter (Webmail))
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:45:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
Message-ID: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>

Good morning,

I now get an error, if I want to start evolution after I'd done a 'pkg-get
-U -u'.
The error is:
Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'

it is on the component OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent

the original message is in german:
Komponente OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent konnte nicht
aktiviert werden:
Der Fehler von Aktivierungssystem lautet:
Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'


Hope this error will be fixed soon, because I need to use evolution.

Thanks

Daniel Seichter


From michael at blastwave.org  Sun Aug  8 11:48:14 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 11:48:14 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
Message-ID: <20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:45:57AM +0200, Daniel Seichter (Webmail) wrote:
> I now get an error, if I want to start evolution after I'd done a 'pkg-get
> -U -u'.

I just updated my system and evolution (including ximian connector) is
running fine.

> The error is:
> Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'

Paste this into google ;-)

Try logging out, and deleting /tmp/orbit-username. Where username is
your username.

http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/Miscellaneous_Linux_notes.html


Regards,
  Michael


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sun Aug  8 13:48:12 2004
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:48:12 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 04:48, Michael Gernoth wrote:

> > The error is:
> > Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'

Also, when I get these types of errors, I do the following. 

log out and start a console
evolution --force-shutdown (should kill evolution-wombat)
kill remaining evolution processes (probably alarm-notify), 
bonobo-activation-server and gconfd-2  running under your userid.  All
of these procesess should be the /opt/csw ones and not /usr

Alex



From daniel at dseichter.de  Sun Aug  8 21:25:03 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 21:25:03 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>
Message-ID: <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>

Hello,

sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
Does a restart of the computer show the same result?

Thank you
Daniel

Am So, den 08.08.2004 schrieb Alex S Moore um 13:48:
> On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 04:48, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> 
> > > The error is:
> > > Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'
> 
> Also, when I get these types of errors, I do the following. 
> 
> log out and start a console
> evolution --force-shutdown (should kill evolution-wombat)
> kill remaining evolution processes (probably alarm-notify), 
> bonobo-activation-server and gconfd-2  running under your userid.  All
> of these procesess should be the /opt/csw ones and not /usr
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sun Aug  8 22:00:17 2004
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:00:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602> <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>
Message-ID: <1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602>

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 14:25, Daniel Seichter wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
> Does a restart of the computer show the same result?

Yes,  I had the same thing happen here and I just restarted.  Glad
things are working.

Alex



From daniel at dseichter.de  Sun Aug  8 22:05:23 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:05:23 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>
	<1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>  <1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602>
Message-ID: <1091995523.2060.8.camel@blade>

> > sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
> > Does a restart of the computer show the same result?
> 
> Yes,  I had the same thing happen here and I just restarted.  Glad
> things are working.
I think, this should be a warning in pkg-get, that after installing libs
or something similar to them, that a restart is recommended.

Daniel



From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Mon Aug  9 05:46:14 2004
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:46:14 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091995523.2060.8.camel@blade>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602> <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>
	<1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602> <1091995523.2060.8.camel@blade>
Message-ID: <20040809034614.GA2896@colnet>

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Daniel Seichter wrote:
> > > sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
> > > Does a restart of the computer show the same result?
> > 
> > Yes,  I had the same thing happen here and I just restarted.  Glad
> > things are working.
> I think, this should be a warning in pkg-get, that after installing libs
> or something similar to them, that a restart is recommended.

A broader question:  If one does load a new package that has
some serious and uncorrectable problems, is there a place where
the older versions are maintained?  This has happended to me a
couple times in the past, and luckily, I have been able to
retrieve a reasonably recent working version out of the stable
directory hierarchy, but some of the ones there are quite
dated.

Also, is there a way of telling pkg-get to save the packages
being updated?  (Say, combining the -d and -u options.)

Rob


From OcallD at cogent-dsn.com  Tue Aug 10 10:55:19 2004
From: OcallD at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:55:19 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] RE: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
Message-ID: <A5E49A0595FB4A489ED566217349B1473240A6@zaphod1.cogent-dsn.local>

Thanks Graham

I take it you want the .bash_profile to point to the .bashrc  (different methods of logging in, access different files for source).

Dan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Brown [mailto:phil at blastwave.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:45 AM
To: newpkgs at lists.blastwave.org
Subject: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary

Attached is the summary of changed or added packages for the last week

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 8/6/2004
 
    

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 8/6/2004
 


From miker at readq.com  Wed Aug 18 23:24:49 2004
From: miker at readq.com (Mike Russo)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:24:49 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
Message-ID: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com>

Ever since gcc3 was upgraded to v3.4.1, I find myself unable to run C++ 
binaries compiled with the previous gcc 3.3.3 package. I know they 
changed the ABI slightly (again), and of course symlinking 
libstdc++.so.6 to so.5 doesn't help for the versioned symbols. Is there 
a package I can install to get this functionality back?
    In fact, the KDE-gcc libs out there right now won't run because of 
this. (And the koffice_gcc package for i386 wound up installing SPARC 
binaries on my system). 
    Also, I ran mkheaders for my up-to-date solaris9_x86 install but I'm 
still having trouble compiling things with gcc 3.4.1 -- is there a way 
of using pkg-get to go back to a previous version?

well i sure brought up a lot of complaints, but the blastwave.org 
packages made my life simpler in many ways! this is a tough undertaking 
but it is really cool, and better than sun's freeware distribution methods.

-mike


From ablanco at fing.edu.uy  Wed Aug 18 23:45:18 2004
From: ablanco at fing.edu.uy (Alejandro Blanco - INCO)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:45:18 -0300
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
In-Reply-To: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com>
References: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com>
Message-ID: <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>

Dear Mike:

Mike Russo wrote:

>    In fact, the KDE-gcc libs out there right now won't run because of 
> this. (And the koffice_gcc package for i386 wound up installing SPARC 
> binaries on my system).    Also, I ran mkheaders for my up-to-date 
> solaris9_x86 install but I'm still having trouble compiling things 
> with gcc 3.4.1 -- is there a way of using pkg-get to go back to a 
> previous version?


I've install KDE-gcc last week and it doesn't work either.

The problem that I've notice is that the binaries of KDE-gcc depends on 
libstdc++.so.5 wich is no longer available (at least not with this 
"version number").

To solve the problem there are two solutions:

1) Install the same version of gcc used to compile KDE-gcc or at least 
the libraries.

2) Recompile KDE-gcc with the same version of gcc (3.4.1) that it's 
available to download from blastwave

Is there some other solution ?.

I'm really interested in using KDE-gcc.

Thanks in advance,

    Alejandro Blanco



From michael at blastwave.org  Wed Aug 18 23:53:45 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:53:45 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
In-Reply-To: <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>
References: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com> <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>
Message-ID: <20040818215345.GC1054@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:45:18PM -0300, Alejandro Blanco - INCO wrote:
> The problem that I've notice is that the binaries of KDE-gcc depends on 
> libstdc++.so.5 wich is no longer available (at least not with this 
> "version number").

It's available again in gcc3rt. Just update to the latest version of
this package and everything should work again:

faui04b [~]# ldd /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/moc | grep stdc
        libstdc++.so.5 =>        /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/libstdc++.so.5

faui04b [~]# grep VERSION /var/sadm/pkg/CSWgcc3rt/pkginfo
VERSION=3.4.1,REV=2004.08.16

Regards,
  Michael


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Thu Aug 19 00:34:57 2004
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:34:57 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
In-Reply-To: <20040818215345.GC1054@zerfleddert.de>
References: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com> <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>
	<20040818215345.GC1054@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <1092868497.22828.38.camel@sws602>

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 16:53, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> It's available again in gcc3rt. Just update to the latest version of
> this package and everything should work again:

And thanks again Michael; now that is responsive :>  

ibiblio.org still shows the 2004.08.02 version, so hopefully it will
sync tonight.

But Mike brings up a good point, which I have heard before.  A fallback
plan would be nice, i.e., if I needed it fixed just now.  Something else
to think about, but I suppose that is up to the individual.  Maybe just
downloading critical pkgs to an archive directory on our own network
would suffice.

Alex



From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca  Fri Aug 20 21:42:59 2004
From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:42:59 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [solarisx86] pkg-get and local files
In-Reply-To: <cg5hnt+m8ol@eGroups.com>
References: <cg5hnt+m8ol@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <41265443.4030402@mie.utoronto.ca>

(posting from solarisx86 to blastwave's users mailing list)

oliverpetschulat wrote:

> blastwave's pkg-get has an option to "download only" instead
> of installing. But I don't see an option "install local copy
> instead of downloading and installing"? So how do I tell
> pkg-get to not download but simply install the packages
> lying in the directory /download ?

Use "pkgadd -d CSW-package-filename.pkg"
You can post a feature request for the pkg-get package
in the bug tracking system of blastwave.org



From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Sat Aug 21 04:23:45 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:23:45 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [solarisx86] pkg-get and local files
In-Reply-To: <41265443.4030402@mie.utoronto.ca>
References: <cg5hnt+m8ol@eGroups.com> <41265443.4030402@mie.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <20040821022345.GA6095@colnet>

On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:42:59PM -0400, Oscar del Rio wrote:
> (posting from solarisx86 to blastwave's users mailing list)
> 
> oliverpetschulat wrote:
> 
> >blastwave's pkg-get has an option to "download only" instead
> >of installing. But I don't see an option "install local copy
> >instead of downloading and installing"? So how do I tell
> >pkg-get to not download but simply install the packages
> >lying in the directory /download ?
> 
> Use "pkgadd -d CSW-package-filename.pkg"
> You can post a feature request for the pkg-get package
> in the bug tracking system of blastwave.org

I've have modified the pkg-get script to do this.  The changes
were fairly straightforward.  A copy of the altered script
is located at:

	<http://cboh.org/pkg-get>

Perhaps someone on the blastwave team could either pick up
these changes or post comments if they don't like them.

Theory of operation:  The pkg-get script now checks for the
variable "local_csw_repository", which is either explicitly
passed in the environment or specified in pkg-get.conf.  If
this variable is set to point to a valid directory, pkg-get
will (1) copy any downloaded package that passes the validity
checks to the specified directory immediately after it is
downloaded, and (2) check to see if a package exists in the
local directory prior to pulling it down from the net, and
use the local version provided it passes the validity checks.

FWIW,
Rob


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 00:10:37 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408241507560.2317-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:

gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
-Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
-DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
/usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
/usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
gmake: *** [update] Error 1


Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
Suresh



From stevel at sun.com  Wed Aug 25 00:16:45 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:16:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408241507560.2317-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408241507560.2317-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <20040824221645.GJ707962@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
does that fix it?

-steve

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> 
> gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> 
> 
> Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 17:57:39 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <20040824221645.GJ707962@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250856470.12740-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

I edited inet_addr_local.c and included both <sys/types.h> and
<sys/zone.h> but I still get the same problem.

This does not happen on 5.9/5.8.

Suresh


On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:

> what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
> does that fix it?
>
> -steve
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> > compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> >
> > gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> > -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> > -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> > In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> > /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> > /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> > gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> > gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Suresh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
> stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



From stevel at sun.com  Wed Aug 25 18:07:17 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:07:17 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250856470.12740-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <20040824221645.GJ707962@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250856470.12740-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <20040825160717.GC283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

does your <sys/types.h> have a typedef for zoneid_t?
(mine is on types.h:360)

-steve

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:57:39AM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> I edited inet_addr_local.c and included both <sys/types.h> and
> <sys/zone.h> but I still get the same problem.
> 
> This does not happen on 5.9/5.8.
> 
> Suresh
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:
> 
> > what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
> > does that fix it?
> >
> > -steve
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > > I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> > > compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> > >
> > > gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> > > -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> > > -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> > > In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> > > /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> > > /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> > > gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Suresh
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> > --
> > stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 18:42:21 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <20040825160717.GC283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250941580.17813-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

Yes it does:

typedef id_t    zoneid_t;

Suresh


On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:

> does your <sys/types.h> have a typedef for zoneid_t?
> (mine is on types.h:360)
>
> -steve
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:57:39AM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > I edited inet_addr_local.c and included both <sys/types.h> and
> > <sys/zone.h> but I still get the same problem.
> >
> > This does not happen on 5.9/5.8.
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:
> >
> > > what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
> > > does that fix it?
> > >
> > > -steve
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > > > I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> > > > compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> > > >
> > > > gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> > > > -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> > > > -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> > > > In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> > > > /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> > > > /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> > > > gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> > > > gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Suresh
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > users mailing list
> > > > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > > --
> > > stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
> stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



From trawick at gmail.com  Wed Aug 25 19:08:47 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:08:47 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250941580.17813-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250941580.17813-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <cc67648e0408251008ff6dbd6@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT), Suresh Rajagopalan
<sraja at cine.net> wrote:
> Yes it does:
> 
> typedef id_t    zoneid_t;
> 
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:
> 
> > does your <sys/types.h> have a typedef for zoneid_t?
> > (mine is on types.h:360)

isn't this issue due to gcc making a mangled copy of some of the
system header files (this happens on AIX too), and when the system is
more recent than the gcc build then unmangled headers can depend on
declarations in another header which are hidden because the mangled
version doesn't have the new declarations in it?

the process of mangling the headers is "fix-includes" or "fixincludes"
or something like that, and re-running that step of the gcc build or
install should fix it


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 19:30:46 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e0408251008ff6dbd6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408251029100.22515-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

> isn't this issue due to gcc making a mangled copy of some of the
> system header files (this happens on AIX too), and when the system is
> more recent than the gcc build then unmangled headers can depend on
> declarations in another header which are hidden because the mangled
> version doesn't have the new declarations in it?
>
> the process of mangling the headers is "fix-includes" or "fixincludes"
> or something like that, and re-running that step of the gcc build or
> install should fix it

I just downloaded Sunone's compiler. That works fine.  So it is a gcc
issue. I'll just have to recompile it for 5.10 I suppose. I dislike running
fixincludes.

-Suresh




From trawick at gmail.com  Wed Aug 25 20:24:20 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:24:20 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86 b63
	(August Solaris Express)?
Message-ID: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>

This was one of the first packages I tried to install on a new install
of this level of Solaris, and the install exited with no specific
error message.  Is it possible that the openssl provided with this
level of Solaris interferes with the Blastwave build?

I don't have the messages from pkg-get handy; for the moment, I'm
curious if anyone else encountered a problem on b63.


From stevel at sun.com  Wed Aug 25 21:04:39 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:04:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

I tried to file a bug on this, but had it closed since blastwave doesn't
officially support beta builds.  But yeah, I the CSWossl and CSWtcl
packages cause pkgadd to core dump on my s10_63 build.  I've got the
core dump here if anyone is interested in looking at it...

cheers,
steve

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:24:20PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> This was one of the first packages I tried to install on a new install
> of this level of Solaris, and the install exited with no specific
> error message.  Is it possible that the openssl provided with this
> level of Solaris interferes with the Blastwave build?
> 
> I don't have the messages from pkg-get handy; for the moment, I'm
> curious if anyone else encountered a problem on b63.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From trawick at gmail.com  Wed Aug 25 23:39:51 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:39:51 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:04:39 -0700, Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> wrote:
> I tried to file a bug on this, but had it closed since blastwave doesn't
> officially support beta builds.  But yeah, I the CSWossl and CSWtcl
> packages cause pkgadd to core dump on my s10_63 build.  I've got the
> core dump here if anyone is interested in looking at it...

I would interpret that as follows: The Solaris pkgadd from s10_63
build crashes with some input file(s) which don't cause earlier pkgadd
to crash.

It sounds like a problem needs to be opened against Solaris Express. 
(I didn't pay the $99 to be able to do that ;) )


From stevel at sun.com  Thu Aug 26 00:05:12 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:05:12 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:39:51PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:04:39 -0700, Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> wrote:
> > I tried to file a bug on this, but had it closed since blastwave doesn't
> > officially support beta builds.  But yeah, I the CSWossl and CSWtcl
> > packages cause pkgadd to core dump on my s10_63 build.  I've got the
> > core dump here if anyone is interested in looking at it...
> 
> I would interpret that as follows: The Solaris pkgadd from s10_63
> build crashes with some input file(s) which don't cause earlier pkgadd
> to crash.
> 
> It sounds like a problem needs to be opened against Solaris Express. 
> (I didn't pay the $99 to be able to do that ;) )

Yeah, I'd like to find out more about what's different in the CSWossl &
CSWtcl packages vs. the rest of the CSW packages before I file the bug
against Solaris' pkgadd first though... unfortunately, I don't know much
about the .pkg format so I don't know how to find this info out.

-steve
-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From michael at blastwave.org  Thu Aug 26 09:22:46 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:22:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <20040826072246.GA26933@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:05:12PM -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
> Yeah, I'd like to find out more about what's different in the CSWossl &
> CSWtcl packages vs. the rest of the CSW packages before I file the bug
> against Solaris' pkgadd first though... unfortunately, I don't know much
> about the .pkg format so I don't know how to find this info out.

This bug has already been reported on comp.unix.solaris, and also
happens with some of suns packages.
To workaround the problem, the solution was to do a
pkgadm revert

After this, it should work.
See: <cg0g38$9sc$1 at new-usenet.uk.sun.com>

Regards,
  Michael


From trawick at gmail.com  Thu Aug 26 14:38:45 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:38:45 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408251029100.22515-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408251029100.22515-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <cc67648e0408260538656cf81d@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT), Suresh Rajagopalan
<sraja at cine.net> wrote:

> I just downloaded Sunone's compiler. That works fine.  So it is a gcc
> issue. I'll just have to recompile it for 5.10 I suppose. I dislike running
> fixincludes.

This worked for me for blastwave gcc 3.4.1 on b63:

cd /opt/csw/gcc3/libexec/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.9/3.4.1/install-tools
sudo ./mkheaders

I wasn't able to compile Apache without doing this.


From rsun at wlgore.com  Thu Aug 26 16:49:59 2004
From: rsun at wlgore.com (Richard D Sun)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:49:59 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd
Message-ID: <OF71924B14.84D86DBB-ON85256EFC.0050E473-85256EFC.00517857@wlgore.com>

Hi,

I'm hoping that one of you has encountered this, but I installed the 
pureftpd package and I can't get it to work properly on some of my 
servers.

The one difference I found is that we paid Sun to install several Solaris 
9 system and none of them are working.  The systems I set up, don't have 
this problem.

This is the error I get:

220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd [TLS] ----------
220-You are user number 1 of 50 allowed.
220-Local time is now 10:44. Server port: 21.
220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server.
220 You will be disconnected after 15 minutes of inactivity.
Name (ra:root): rsun
331 User rsun OK. Password required
Password:
421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
Login failed.
No control connection for command: No such file or directory
ftp>

Is there some sort of file I'm missing or some sort of permission problem?

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard D. Sun ??
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
mailto:rsun at wlgore.com (preferred)
Tel: (410)506-4168, Fax: (410)506-4400
http://www.gore.com


Gore Associates: Change the "Delivery Options" of your message to "High" 
Importance to page me immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040826/b0909afe/attachment.html 

From sraja at cine.net  Thu Aug 26 17:37:50 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Compiling gcc from SUNWspro
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e0408260538656cf81d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408260835120.28156-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

This is not a strictly blastwave question, but I hope someone has
encountered this:

In compiling gcc/3.3.3 from SUNWspro on Solaris 10, I am getting the
following error.  Is there a compiler flag setting to SUNWspro that fixes this?

Thanks
Suresh


make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
if [ x"" != x ]; then \
  cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include    sigsetmask.c -o
pic/sigsetmask.o; \
else true; fi
cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include   sigsetmask.c -o sigsetmask.o
"/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h", line 330: #error: "Compiler or options
invalid for pre-UNIX 03 X/Open applications     and pre-2001 POSIX
applications"
cc: acomp failed for sigsetmask.c
make[1]: *** [sigsetmask.o] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2




From Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM  Thu Aug 26 17:57:06 2004
From: Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM (Thomas Jordan)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:57:06 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Compiling gcc from SUNWspro
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408260835120.28156-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408260835120.28156-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <412E0852.7040106@Sun.Com>

try adding
-xc99=%none
to your CFLAGS


Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> This is not a strictly blastwave question, but I hope someone has
> encountered this:
> 
> In compiling gcc/3.3.3 from SUNWspro on Solaris 10, I am getting the
> following error.  Is there a compiler flag setting to SUNWspro that fixes this?
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
> if [ x"" != x ]; then \
>   cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include    sigsetmask.c -o
> pic/sigsetmask.o; \
> else true; fi
> cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include   sigsetmask.c -o sigsetmask.o
> "/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h", line 330: #error: "Compiler or options
> invalid for pre-UNIX 03 X/Open applications     and pre-2001 POSIX
> applications"
> cc: acomp failed for sigsetmask.c
> make[1]: *** [sigsetmask.o] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
> make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From stevel at sun.com  Thu Aug 26 19:59:50 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:59:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <20040826072246.GA26933@zerfleddert.de>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<20040826072246.GA26933@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <20040826175950.GS283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:05:12PM -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
> > Yeah, I'd like to find out more about what's different in the CSWossl &
> > CSWtcl packages vs. the rest of the CSW packages before I file the bug
> > against Solaris' pkgadd first though... unfortunately, I don't know much
> > about the .pkg format so I don't know how to find this info out.
> 
> This bug has already been reported on comp.unix.solaris, and also
> happens with some of suns packages.
> To workaround the problem, the solution was to do a
> pkgadm revert
> 
> After this, it should work.
> See: <cg0g38$9sc$1 at new-usenet.uk.sun.com>

Ahhh...thanks for the solution/workaround Michael!!

cheers,
steve

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM  Fri Aug 27 14:18:05 2004
From: Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM (Alexey Kuzmichev)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:18:05 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with fonts and libraries
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>

o- symbol gdk_threads_lock/unlock: referenced symbol not found

If I have /opt/csw/lib behind /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH I can not
start gimp, mozilla and gnumeric (symbol not found). Bluefish works fine
with excellent font rendering.

o- blured or aliased fonts

If I have /opt/csw/lib in front of /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if I
unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get blurred (gimp, mozilla, gnumeric) or badly
aliased (bluefish) fonts.

All blastwave packages have been upgraded to the latest available. The
latest Solaris patches have been installed with PatchManager.

# uname -a
SunOS tabla 5.9 Generic_117171-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10

Any ideas?

Thank you,
Alexey




From michael at blastwave.org  Fri Aug 27 15:23:20 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:23:20 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
Message-ID: <20040827132320.GA32445@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:18:05PM +0200, Alexey Kuzmichev wrote:
> If I have /opt/csw/lib behind /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH I can not
> start gimp, mozilla and gnumeric (symbol not found). Bluefish works fine
> with excellent font rendering.

Do not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

> If I have /opt/csw/lib in front of /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if I
> unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get blurred (gimp, mozilla, gnumeric) or badly
> aliased (bluefish) fonts.

run gnome-font-properties, which is part of control_center.

Regards,
  Michael


From michael.blatt at btopenworld.com  Fri Aug 27 17:09:51 2004
From: michael.blatt at btopenworld.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Michael=20Blatt?=)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:09:51 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [csw-users] rhythmbox and the gnome mixer
Message-ID: <20040827150951.94992.qmail@web86108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi all,
 
I re-discovered CSW a couple of weeks ago after over a year away from Solaris. I have installed the Gnome 2.6 meta-package and rhythmbox to go with it.
I remember reading that the Gnome mixer does not support Solaris as of yet, which is OK because we can use the sdtaudiocontrol and xmms anyway.
I suppose the problem is when you try rhythmbox, which uses gst-player (IIRC) and hence probably depends on the Gnome mixer.
So when I start rhythmbox I see CPU activity and then the usual "the applicaition has quit unexpectedly".
This happens both on Solaris 8 SPARC (Sun Ultra 5) and Solaris 9 x86 (some Compaq Deskpro).
Surely since the package exists, someone must have been able to run it? How do you do that without depending on gnome-mixer? Use the Xine backend maybe, but that is decided at compile time isn't it?
 
Thanks for any info or pointers,
 
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040827/4399e976/attachment.html 

From Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM  Fri Aug 27 22:27:22 2004
From: Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM (Alexey Kuzmichev)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:27:22 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>


Hi Michael,

On Fri Aug 27 15:23:20 MEST 2004, Michael Gernoth wrote:

>> If I have /opt/csw/lib behind /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH I can not
>> start gimp, mozilla and gnumeric (symbol not found). Bluefish works fine
>> with excellent font rendering.
>
> Do not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

I know that it's not recommended to set this variable. I set it to prove
the fact that bundled /usr/lib (unlike /opt/csw/lib) libraries render
all fonts perfectly (but unfortunately can not be used with some applicatons).

>
>> If I have /opt/csw/lib in front of /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if I
>> unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get blurred (gimp, mozilla, gnumeric) or badly
>> aliased (bluefish) fonts.
>
>run gnome-font-properties, which is part of control_center.

gnome-font-properties "allows you to select the fonts to use in your
applications and desktop background." It does not affect
rendering/aliasing. BTW, gnome-font-properties does not change mozilla
or gimp fonts.

One correction. Gnumeric's font is not "blurred"  but as "broken" as
bluefish' one.

Thank you,
Alexey


From michael at blastwave.org  Fri Aug 27 22:58:43 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:58:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Re: Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>
Message-ID: <20040827205843.GA32076@zerfleddert.de>

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:27:22PM +0200, Alexey Kuzmichev wrote:
> gnome-font-properties "allows you to select the fonts to use in your
> applications and desktop background." It does not affect
> rendering/aliasing. BTW, gnome-font-properties does not change mozilla
> or gimp fonts.

In my version of /opt/csw/bin/gnome-font-properties I can configure
antialiasing. Clicking on details leads me to even more
rendering-settings (like which type of LCD I want to use with subpixel-
rendering).

Regards,
  Michael


From derek at trideja.com  Sat Aug 28 11:44:56 2004
From: derek at trideja.com (Derek Warren)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:44:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Other Solaris 10b63 Oddities
Message-ID: <p06110400bd5603d08511@[192.168.0.40]>

Yes, thanks, Mike, for the workaround for installing OpenSSL! 
However, I ran into a litt^H^H^H^Hbig fat snag.  Envision this:

# pkgadm revert
#

Hmm. All seems well, but...

# pkginfo
ERROR: The install database does not exist.

.... oh, crap. :)  Hmm. Can I reverse this?

# pkgadm upgrade
ERROR: The install database does not exist.

.... aaaaaargh!  Is this an anomaly or has anyone else had this 
happen to them?  I'm reinstalling Solaris 10b63 as I speak.  This 
time around I'll have more incentive to make a Flash archive of the 
installation in case pkgadm buggers things up again.


Packagelessly,
Derek
-- 


[ http://derek.trideja.com/buxton-sig.mov ]


From daniel at dseichter.de  Sat Aug 28 16:03:19 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:03:19 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error in GAIM 0.82
Message-ID: <1093701799.1917.2.camel@blade>

Hello,

since I'd upgraded to Gaim 0.82 I receive the following error:
(There was an error receiving this message)

Maybe this will be fixed in the Gaim 0.82.1 release?!

Daniel Seichter



From Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM  Sun Aug 29 01:13:02 2004
From: Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM (Alexey Kuzmichev)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:13:02 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <20040827205843.GA32076@zerfleddert.de>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>
	<20040827205843.GA32076@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408281900070.27042@doom>

Actually I already played with subpixel smoothing before to no avail,
but anyways, I installed CSW gnome-font-properties and a bunch of
additional CSW libs and tried again. Here's the result:

o- Subpixel (LCD) - immediately breaks fonts (makes them unreadable) in
SOME applications (e.g.  gnome-font-properties, bluefish). CSW Mozilla
and other non CSW apps are not affected.

o- Hinting set to None - text is readable, but font shapes are horrible.
Mozilla and non-CSW apps are not affected again.

o- All other options do not change anything anywhere. Checked with 10x
magnifier :-) Mozilla's fonts are still blurred, bluefish ones are still
bad shaped.

The interesting thing is that non CSW apps or CSW apps with the standard
libs do not have problems with fonts.  Am I still doing anything wrong?

I'm using AFB card and LCD monitor.

Thank you,
Alexey

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Michael Gernoth wrote:

>On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:27:22PM +0200, Alexey Kuzmichev wrote:
>> gnome-font-properties "allows you to select the fonts to use in your
>> applications and desktop background." It does not affect
>> rendering/aliasing. BTW, gnome-font-properties does not change mozilla
>> or gimp fonts.
>
>In my version of /opt/csw/bin/gnome-font-properties I can configure
>antialiasing. Clicking on details leads me to even more
>rendering-settings (like which type of LCD I want to use with subpixel-
>rendering).
>
>Regards,
>  Michael
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

-- 
Alexey Kuzmichev
Sun Microsystems/EDS Global Internet Services Operations
+31-(0)33-451-6106 x76106 (CET) alekz at sun.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Mon Aug  2 07:53:22 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:53:22 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20040802055322.GA19748@colnet>

On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:45:02PM -0400, Philip Brown wrote:
> Attached is the summary of changed or added packages for the last week
...
> firefox - mozilla.org browser

Am curious: I couldn't find firefox on any of the mirrors.
I realize it is relatively new, but while I'm posting, I've been
looking for the squirrelmail pkg for months now without success.  

What's going on with these packages?

Thanks,
Rob


From asmoore at edge.net  Mon Aug  2 13:33:11 2004
From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:33:11 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802055322.GA19748@colnet>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet>
Message-ID: <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:53:22 -0400
Robert Stampfli <csw at colnet.cboh.org> wrote:

> Am curious: I couldn't find firefox on any of the mirrors.

It is at the ibiblio mirror.  The other mirrors should sync within the
next 48 hours.

> I realize it is relatively new, but while I'm posting, I've been
> looking for the squirrelmail pkg for months now without success.  

I do not see that on the 'Packages requested so far:' page.  Does
squirrelmail go by another name?  That said, having it listed does not
guarantee a pkg will be built.  Someone has to want to package it. 
Actually, that was how I got involved as a maintainer.  I wanted a
particular mua program and was subsequently challenged to build it :>

Alex


From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Mon Aug  2 15:47:46 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:47:46 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet> <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
Message-ID: <20040802134745.GA20197@colnet>

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 06:33:11AM -0500, Alex S Moore wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:53:22 -0400
> Robert Stampfli <csw at colnet.cboh.org> wrote:
> 
> > Am curious: I couldn't find firefox on any of the mirrors.
> 
> It is at the ibiblio mirror.  The other mirrors should sync within the
> next 48 hours.

So it is.  Thanks.

> > I realize it is relatively new, but while I'm posting, I've been
> > looking for the squirrelmail pkg for months now without success.  
> 
> I do not see that on the 'Packages requested so far:' page.  Does
> squirrelmail go by another name?  That said, having it listed does not
> guarantee a pkg will be built.  Someone has to want to package it. 
> Actually, that was how I got involved as a maintainer.  I wanted a
> particular mua program and was subsequently challenged to build it :>

It's listed in packages.php as "squirrelm".  It certainly *looks*
like it has been built.  Andre Dalle is the maintainer.  Perhaps
something fell through the cracks.  (I needed it, but it wasn't
too hard just to pull down and install from scratch, so I haven't
pursued it with you all.)

Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
am looking forward to trying it out!

Rob


From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Mon Aug  2 20:27:58 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:27:58 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802134745.GA20197@colnet>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet> <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
	<20040802134745.GA20197@colnet>
Message-ID: <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
> am looking forward to trying it out!

One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:

-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*

in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
-R path specified.

As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.

First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".

Rob


From sloewenthal at gemini.edu  Mon Aug  2 20:41:03 2004
From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:41:03 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>
Message-ID: <AOEOIBDLMPAFMBPDBDNOEEBADBAA.sloewenthal@gemini.edu>

Hi Rob,

> First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
> any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
> Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".


I thought this when I first started using Firefox.  Seems that Firefox comes
in a barebones format, but if you go to forefox.org then you can download
all the functionality that should come with it.  Still, i changed bacl to
using Mozilla.

S.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org]On Behalf Of Robert Stampfli
Sent: 02 August 2004 14:28
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary


On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
> am looking forward to trying it out!

One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:

-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*

in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
-R path specified.

As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.

First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".

Rob
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004



From sloewenthal at gemini.edu  Mon Aug  2 21:12:44 2004
From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:12:44 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <AOEOIBDLMPAFMBPDBDNOEEBADBAA.sloewenthal@gemini.edu>
Message-ID: <AOEOIBDLMPAFMBPDBDNOKEBBDBAA.sloewenthal@gemini.edu>

Rob,

http://update.mozilla.org/ , and not forefix.org as I mistyped earlier.



-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org]On Behalf Of LOEWENTHAL Simon
Sent: 02 August 2004 14:41
To: questions and discussions
Subject: RE: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary


Hi Rob,

> First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
> any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
> Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".


I thought this when I first started using Firefox.  Seems that Firefox comes
in a barebones format, but if you go to forefox.org then you can download
all the functionality that should come with it.  Still, i changed bacl to
using Mozilla.

S.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.blastwave.org]On Behalf Of Robert Stampfli
Sent: 02 August 2004 14:28
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary


On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
> am looking forward to trying it out!

One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:

-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*

in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
-R path specified.

As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.

First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".

Rob
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004



From Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM  Mon Aug  2 22:16:31 2004
From: Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM (Thomas Jordan)
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 14:16:31 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
In-Reply-To: <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>
References: <20040802034502.GA19616@blastwave.blastwave.org>
	<20040802055322.GA19748@colnet> <20040802063311.5223b0e9@sws602>
	<20040802134745.GA20197@colnet> <20040802182757.GA20740@colnet>
Message-ID: <410EA11F.1090901@Sun.Com>

thanks... It was all compiled with the same options, but let me go peek 
and see what I can come up with.  Thanks for the feedback.


Robert Stampfli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> 
>>Thanks for providing foxfire -- indeed, all the CSW builds for us --
>>am looking forward to trying it out!
> 
> 
> One CSW-build comment:  After installing firefox (Solaris 8, Ultra-2)
> I found that /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client would
> not run.  The problem is that it cannot find the libraries:
> 
> -rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        11236 Aug  2 14:10 libplds4.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin        27180 Aug  2 14:10 libplc4.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin       318944 Aug  2 14:10 libnspr4.so*
> 
> in /opt/csw/libexec/firefox  (although the firefox-bin executable
> does just fine and this does not prevent firefox from coming up).
> I think mozilla-xremote-client needs to be built with another
> -R path specified.
> 
> As a workaround, I linked the above libraries into /opt/csw/lib.
> 
> First impressions:  It's a nice little browser, if you can call
> any browser little these days.  Not a lot of options, though.
> Sure wish it had the Mozilla equivalent of "animate gifs only once".
> 
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Fri Aug  6 15:38:39 2004
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] cfengine 2.1.8 released with (note
	this on upgrade)
In-Reply-To: <20040806091119.GI15320@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <20040806091119.GI15320@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408060937140.932@blastwave>


> This are some known mutex problems which appear only on platforms which
> *haven't* *full and current* POSIX threads support (solaris doesn't).

Really?  I thought that Solaris was POSIX compliant and mt safe
everywhere.  I must be mislead.  I think I will pull my books off the
shelf that I have here and check the standards.

+--------------------+---------------------------------------+
|  Dennis Clarke     |  Director and Admin for blastwave.org |
|   dclarke          |  Community Software Packages for      |
|     @blastwave.org |  The Solaris Operating Environment    |
+--------------------+---------------------------------------+


From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de  Fri Aug  6 16:16:52 2004
From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:16:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] cfengine 2.1.8 released with (note
	this on upgrade)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408060937140.932@blastwave>
References: <20040806091119.GI15320@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0408060937140.932@blastwave>
Message-ID: <20040806141652.GJ22341@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

Hello Dennis,

> > This are some known mutex problems which appear only on platforms which
> > *haven't* *full and current* POSIX threads support (solaris doesn't).

> Really?  I thought that Solaris was POSIX compliant and mt safe
> everywhere.  I must be mislead.  I think I will pull my books off the
> shelf that I have here and check the standards.

I have no idea, I was just quoting. But you could ask Mark Burgess
<mark at iu.hio.no>.

Sincerely,
	Thomas


From kenmays at blastwave.org  Sat Aug  7 17:26:09 2004
From: kenmays at blastwave.org (Ken Mays)
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] cfengine 2.1.8 released with (note
	this on upgrade)
Message-ID: <200408071526.i77FQ9o05354@blastwave.org>

Hey...any increase in memory on apollo or what is the ETA on the **new*** apollo?
Ken


From daniel at dseichter.de  Sun Aug  8 09:45:57 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter (Webmail))
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:45:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
Message-ID: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>

Good morning,

I now get an error, if I want to start evolution after I'd done a 'pkg-get
-U -u'.
The error is:
Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'

it is on the component OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent

the original message is in german:
Komponente OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent konnte nicht
aktiviert werden:
Der Fehler von Aktivierungssystem lautet:
Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'


Hope this error will be fixed soon, because I need to use evolution.

Thanks

Daniel Seichter


From michael at blastwave.org  Sun Aug  8 11:48:14 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 11:48:14 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
Message-ID: <20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:45:57AM +0200, Daniel Seichter (Webmail) wrote:
> I now get an error, if I want to start evolution after I'd done a 'pkg-get
> -U -u'.

I just updated my system and evolution (including ximian connector) is
running fine.

> The error is:
> Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'

Paste this into google ;-)

Try logging out, and deleting /tmp/orbit-username. Where username is
your username.

http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/Miscellaneous_Linux_notes.html


Regards,
  Michael


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sun Aug  8 13:48:12 2004
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:48:12 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 04:48, Michael Gernoth wrote:

> > The error is:
> > Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'

Also, when I get these types of errors, I do the following. 

log out and start a console
evolution --force-shutdown (should kill evolution-wombat)
kill remaining evolution processes (probably alarm-notify), 
bonobo-activation-server and gconfd-2  running under your userid.  All
of these procesess should be the /opt/csw ones and not /usr

Alex



From daniel at dseichter.de  Sun Aug  8 21:25:03 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 21:25:03 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>
Message-ID: <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>

Hello,

sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
Does a restart of the computer show the same result?

Thank you
Daniel

Am So, den 08.08.2004 schrieb Alex S Moore um 13:48:
> On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 04:48, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> 
> > > The error is:
> > > Unknown CORBA exception id: 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/INV_OBJREF:1.0'
> 
> Also, when I get these types of errors, I do the following. 
> 
> log out and start a console
> evolution --force-shutdown (should kill evolution-wombat)
> kill remaining evolution processes (probably alarm-notify), 
> bonobo-activation-server and gconfd-2  running under your userid.  All
> of these procesess should be the /opt/csw ones and not /usr
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sun Aug  8 22:00:17 2004
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:00:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602> <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>
Message-ID: <1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602>

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 14:25, Daniel Seichter wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
> Does a restart of the computer show the same result?

Yes,  I had the same thing happen here and I just restarted.  Glad
things are working.

Alex



From daniel at dseichter.de  Sun Aug  8 22:05:23 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:05:23 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602>
	<1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>  <1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602>
Message-ID: <1091995523.2060.8.camel@blade>

> > sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
> > Does a restart of the computer show the same result?
> 
> Yes,  I had the same thing happen here and I just restarted.  Glad
> things are working.
I think, this should be a warning in pkg-get, that after installing libs
or something similar to them, that a restart is recommended.

Daniel



From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Mon Aug  9 05:46:14 2004
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:46:14 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Error after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1091995523.2060.8.camel@blade>
References: <36145.84.128.150.248.1091951157.24419.squirrel@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<20040808094814.GA11321@zerfleddert.de>
	<1091965691.14438.6.camel@sws602> <1091993103.2060.5.camel@blade>
	<1091995216.992.21.camel@sws602> <1091995523.2060.8.camel@blade>
Message-ID: <20040809034614.GA2896@colnet>

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Daniel Seichter wrote:
> > > sorry for the time for waiting for my answer. I tried it and it worked. 
> > > Does a restart of the computer show the same result?
> > 
> > Yes,  I had the same thing happen here and I just restarted.  Glad
> > things are working.
> I think, this should be a warning in pkg-get, that after installing libs
> or something similar to them, that a restart is recommended.

A broader question:  If one does load a new package that has
some serious and uncorrectable problems, is there a place where
the older versions are maintained?  This has happended to me a
couple times in the past, and luckily, I have been able to
retrieve a reasonably recent working version out of the stable
directory hierarchy, but some of the ones there are quite
dated.

Also, is there a way of telling pkg-get to save the packages
being updated?  (Say, combining the -d and -u options.)

Rob


From OcallD at cogent-dsn.com  Tue Aug 10 10:55:19 2004
From: OcallD at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:55:19 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] RE: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary
Message-ID: <A5E49A0595FB4A489ED566217349B1473240A6@zaphod1.cogent-dsn.local>

Thanks Graham

I take it you want the .bash_profile to point to the .bashrc  (different methods of logging in, access different files for source).

Dan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Brown [mailto:phil at blastwave.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:45 AM
To: newpkgs at lists.blastwave.org
Subject: [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary

Attached is the summary of changed or added packages for the last week

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 8/6/2004
 
    

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 8/6/2004
 


From miker at readq.com  Wed Aug 18 23:24:49 2004
From: miker at readq.com (Mike Russo)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:24:49 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
Message-ID: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com>

Ever since gcc3 was upgraded to v3.4.1, I find myself unable to run C++ 
binaries compiled with the previous gcc 3.3.3 package. I know they 
changed the ABI slightly (again), and of course symlinking 
libstdc++.so.6 to so.5 doesn't help for the versioned symbols. Is there 
a package I can install to get this functionality back?
    In fact, the KDE-gcc libs out there right now won't run because of 
this. (And the koffice_gcc package for i386 wound up installing SPARC 
binaries on my system). 
    Also, I ran mkheaders for my up-to-date solaris9_x86 install but I'm 
still having trouble compiling things with gcc 3.4.1 -- is there a way 
of using pkg-get to go back to a previous version?

well i sure brought up a lot of complaints, but the blastwave.org 
packages made my life simpler in many ways! this is a tough undertaking 
but it is really cool, and better than sun's freeware distribution methods.

-mike


From ablanco at fing.edu.uy  Wed Aug 18 23:45:18 2004
From: ablanco at fing.edu.uy (Alejandro Blanco - INCO)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:45:18 -0300
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
In-Reply-To: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com>
References: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com>
Message-ID: <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>

Dear Mike:

Mike Russo wrote:

>    In fact, the KDE-gcc libs out there right now won't run because of 
> this. (And the koffice_gcc package for i386 wound up installing SPARC 
> binaries on my system).    Also, I ran mkheaders for my up-to-date 
> solaris9_x86 install but I'm still having trouble compiling things 
> with gcc 3.4.1 -- is there a way of using pkg-get to go back to a 
> previous version?


I've install KDE-gcc last week and it doesn't work either.

The problem that I've notice is that the binaries of KDE-gcc depends on 
libstdc++.so.5 wich is no longer available (at least not with this 
"version number").

To solve the problem there are two solutions:

1) Install the same version of gcc used to compile KDE-gcc or at least 
the libraries.

2) Recompile KDE-gcc with the same version of gcc (3.4.1) that it's 
available to download from blastwave

Is there some other solution ?.

I'm really interested in using KDE-gcc.

Thanks in advance,

    Alejandro Blanco



From michael at blastwave.org  Wed Aug 18 23:53:45 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:53:45 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
In-Reply-To: <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>
References: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com> <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>
Message-ID: <20040818215345.GC1054@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:45:18PM -0300, Alejandro Blanco - INCO wrote:
> The problem that I've notice is that the binaries of KDE-gcc depends on 
> libstdc++.so.5 wich is no longer available (at least not with this 
> "version number").

It's available again in gcc3rt. Just update to the latest version of
this package and everything should work again:

faui04b [~]# ldd /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/moc | grep stdc
        libstdc++.so.5 =>        /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/libstdc++.so.5

faui04b [~]# grep VERSION /var/sadm/pkg/CSWgcc3rt/pkginfo
VERSION=3.4.1,REV=2004.08.16

Regards,
  Michael


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Thu Aug 19 00:34:57 2004
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:34:57 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gcc 3.3.x library package?
In-Reply-To: <20040818215345.GC1054@zerfleddert.de>
References: <4123C921.2000903@readq.com> <4123CDEE.8000709@fing.edu.uy>
	<20040818215345.GC1054@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <1092868497.22828.38.camel@sws602>

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 16:53, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> It's available again in gcc3rt. Just update to the latest version of
> this package and everything should work again:

And thanks again Michael; now that is responsive :>  

ibiblio.org still shows the 2004.08.02 version, so hopefully it will
sync tonight.

But Mike brings up a good point, which I have heard before.  A fallback
plan would be nice, i.e., if I needed it fixed just now.  Something else
to think about, but I suppose that is up to the individual.  Maybe just
downloading critical pkgs to an archive directory on our own network
would suffice.

Alex



From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca  Fri Aug 20 21:42:59 2004
From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:42:59 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [solarisx86] pkg-get and local files
In-Reply-To: <cg5hnt+m8ol@eGroups.com>
References: <cg5hnt+m8ol@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <41265443.4030402@mie.utoronto.ca>

(posting from solarisx86 to blastwave's users mailing list)

oliverpetschulat wrote:

> blastwave's pkg-get has an option to "download only" instead
> of installing. But I don't see an option "install local copy
> instead of downloading and installing"? So how do I tell
> pkg-get to not download but simply install the packages
> lying in the directory /download ?

Use "pkgadd -d CSW-package-filename.pkg"
You can post a feature request for the pkg-get package
in the bug tracking system of blastwave.org



From csw at colnet.cboh.org  Sat Aug 21 04:23:45 2004
From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:23:45 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Re: [solarisx86] pkg-get and local files
In-Reply-To: <41265443.4030402@mie.utoronto.ca>
References: <cg5hnt+m8ol@eGroups.com> <41265443.4030402@mie.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <20040821022345.GA6095@colnet>

On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:42:59PM -0400, Oscar del Rio wrote:
> (posting from solarisx86 to blastwave's users mailing list)
> 
> oliverpetschulat wrote:
> 
> >blastwave's pkg-get has an option to "download only" instead
> >of installing. But I don't see an option "install local copy
> >instead of downloading and installing"? So how do I tell
> >pkg-get to not download but simply install the packages
> >lying in the directory /download ?
> 
> Use "pkgadd -d CSW-package-filename.pkg"
> You can post a feature request for the pkg-get package
> in the bug tracking system of blastwave.org

I've have modified the pkg-get script to do this.  The changes
were fairly straightforward.  A copy of the altered script
is located at:

	<http://cboh.org/pkg-get>

Perhaps someone on the blastwave team could either pick up
these changes or post comments if they don't like them.

Theory of operation:  The pkg-get script now checks for the
variable "local_csw_repository", which is either explicitly
passed in the environment or specified in pkg-get.conf.  If
this variable is set to point to a valid directory, pkg-get
will (1) copy any downloaded package that passes the validity
checks to the specified directory immediately after it is
downloaded, and (2) check to see if a package exists in the
local directory prior to pulling it down from the net, and
use the local version provided it passes the validity checks.

FWIW,
Rob


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 00:10:37 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408241507560.2317-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:

gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
-Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
-DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
/usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
/usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
gmake: *** [update] Error 1


Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
Suresh



From stevel at sun.com  Wed Aug 25 00:16:45 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:16:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408241507560.2317-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408241507560.2317-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <20040824221645.GJ707962@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
does that fix it?

-steve

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> 
> gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> 
> 
> Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 17:57:39 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <20040824221645.GJ707962@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250856470.12740-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

I edited inet_addr_local.c and included both <sys/types.h> and
<sys/zone.h> but I still get the same problem.

This does not happen on 5.9/5.8.

Suresh


On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:

> what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
> does that fix it?
>
> -steve
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> > compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> >
> > gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> > -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> > -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> > In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> > /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> > /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> > gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> > gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Suresh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
> stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



From stevel at sun.com  Wed Aug 25 18:07:17 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:07:17 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250856470.12740-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <20040824221645.GJ707962@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250856470.12740-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <20040825160717.GC283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

does your <sys/types.h> have a typedef for zoneid_t?
(mine is on types.h:360)

-steve

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:57:39AM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> I edited inet_addr_local.c and included both <sys/types.h> and
> <sys/zone.h> but I still get the same problem.
> 
> This does not happen on 5.9/5.8.
> 
> Suresh
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:
> 
> > what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
> > does that fix it?
> >
> > -steve
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > > I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> > > compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> > >
> > > gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> > > -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> > > -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> > > In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> > > /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> > > /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> > > gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Suresh
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> > --
> > stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 18:42:21 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <20040825160717.GC283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250941580.17813-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

Yes it does:

typedef id_t    zoneid_t;

Suresh


On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:

> does your <sys/types.h> have a typedef for zoneid_t?
> (mine is on types.h:360)
>
> -steve
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:57:39AM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > I edited inet_addr_local.c and included both <sys/types.h> and
> > <sys/zone.h> but I still get the same problem.
> >
> > This does not happen on 5.9/5.8.
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:
> >
> > > what if you edit inet_addr_local.c and have it #include <sys/types.h>,
> > > does that fix it?
> > >
> > > -steve
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> > > > I'm running solaris 10_b60/sparc with blastwave packages. In trying to
> > > > compile postfix (I need a customized version), I get the following error:
> > > >
> > > > gcc -DHAS_POSIX_REGEXP -Dstrcasecmp=fix_strcasecmp
> > > > -Dstrncasecmp=fix_strncasecmp -DHAS_PCRE -I/opt/csw/include -g -O -I.
> > > > -DSUNOS5 -c inet_addr_local.c
> > > > In file included from inet_addr_local.c:41:
> > > > /usr/include/net/if.h:368: error: parse error before "zoneid_t"
> > > > /usr/include/net/if.h:390: error: parse error before '}' token
> > > > gmake: *** [inet_addr_local.o] Error 1
> > > > gmake: *** [update] Error 1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is this is a solaris or gcc error?  Any help is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Suresh
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > users mailing list
> > > > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > > --
> > > stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
> stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



From trawick at gmail.com  Wed Aug 25 19:08:47 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:08:47 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250941580.17813-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408250941580.17813-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <cc67648e0408251008ff6dbd6@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT), Suresh Rajagopalan
<sraja at cine.net> wrote:
> Yes it does:
> 
> typedef id_t    zoneid_t;
> 
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Stephen Lau wrote:
> 
> > does your <sys/types.h> have a typedef for zoneid_t?
> > (mine is on types.h:360)

isn't this issue due to gcc making a mangled copy of some of the
system header files (this happens on AIX too), and when the system is
more recent than the gcc build then unmangled headers can depend on
declarations in another header which are hidden because the mangled
version doesn't have the new declarations in it?

the process of mangling the headers is "fix-includes" or "fixincludes"
or something like that, and re-running that step of the gcc build or
install should fix it


From sraja at cine.net  Wed Aug 25 19:30:46 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e0408251008ff6dbd6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408251029100.22515-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

> isn't this issue due to gcc making a mangled copy of some of the
> system header files (this happens on AIX too), and when the system is
> more recent than the gcc build then unmangled headers can depend on
> declarations in another header which are hidden because the mangled
> version doesn't have the new declarations in it?
>
> the process of mangling the headers is "fix-includes" or "fixincludes"
> or something like that, and re-running that step of the gcc build or
> install should fix it

I just downloaded Sunone's compiler. That works fine.  So it is a gcc
issue. I'll just have to recompile it for 5.10 I suppose. I dislike running
fixincludes.

-Suresh




From trawick at gmail.com  Wed Aug 25 20:24:20 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:24:20 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86 b63
	(August Solaris Express)?
Message-ID: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>

This was one of the first packages I tried to install on a new install
of this level of Solaris, and the install exited with no specific
error message.  Is it possible that the openssl provided with this
level of Solaris interferes with the Blastwave build?

I don't have the messages from pkg-get handy; for the moment, I'm
curious if anyone else encountered a problem on b63.


From stevel at sun.com  Wed Aug 25 21:04:39 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:04:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

I tried to file a bug on this, but had it closed since blastwave doesn't
officially support beta builds.  But yeah, I the CSWossl and CSWtcl
packages cause pkgadd to core dump on my s10_63 build.  I've got the
core dump here if anyone is interested in looking at it...

cheers,
steve

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:24:20PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> This was one of the first packages I tried to install on a new install
> of this level of Solaris, and the install exited with no specific
> error message.  Is it possible that the openssl provided with this
> level of Solaris interferes with the Blastwave build?
> 
> I don't have the messages from pkg-get handy; for the moment, I'm
> curious if anyone else encountered a problem on b63.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From trawick at gmail.com  Wed Aug 25 23:39:51 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:39:51 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:04:39 -0700, Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> wrote:
> I tried to file a bug on this, but had it closed since blastwave doesn't
> officially support beta builds.  But yeah, I the CSWossl and CSWtcl
> packages cause pkgadd to core dump on my s10_63 build.  I've got the
> core dump here if anyone is interested in looking at it...

I would interpret that as follows: The Solaris pkgadd from s10_63
build crashes with some input file(s) which don't cause earlier pkgadd
to crash.

It sounds like a problem needs to be opened against Solaris Express. 
(I didn't pay the $99 to be able to do that ;) )


From stevel at sun.com  Thu Aug 26 00:05:12 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:05:12 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:39:51PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:04:39 -0700, Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> wrote:
> > I tried to file a bug on this, but had it closed since blastwave doesn't
> > officially support beta builds.  But yeah, I the CSWossl and CSWtcl
> > packages cause pkgadd to core dump on my s10_63 build.  I've got the
> > core dump here if anyone is interested in looking at it...
> 
> I would interpret that as follows: The Solaris pkgadd from s10_63
> build crashes with some input file(s) which don't cause earlier pkgadd
> to crash.
> 
> It sounds like a problem needs to be opened against Solaris Express. 
> (I didn't pay the $99 to be able to do that ;) )

Yeah, I'd like to find out more about what's different in the CSWossl &
CSWtcl packages vs. the rest of the CSW packages before I file the bug
against Solaris' pkgadd first though... unfortunately, I don't know much
about the .pkg format so I don't know how to find this info out.

-steve
-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From michael at blastwave.org  Thu Aug 26 09:22:46 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:22:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
Message-ID: <20040826072246.GA26933@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:05:12PM -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
> Yeah, I'd like to find out more about what's different in the CSWossl &
> CSWtcl packages vs. the rest of the CSW packages before I file the bug
> against Solaris' pkgadd first though... unfortunately, I don't know much
> about the .pkg format so I don't know how to find this info out.

This bug has already been reported on comp.unix.solaris, and also
happens with some of suns packages.
To workaround the problem, the solution was to do a
pkgadm revert

After this, it should work.
See: <cg0g38$9sc$1 at new-usenet.uk.sun.com>

Regards,
  Michael


From trawick at gmail.com  Thu Aug 26 14:38:45 2004
From: trawick at gmail.com (Jeff Trawick)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:38:45 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] zoneid_t compile error
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408251029100.22515-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408251029100.22515-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <cc67648e0408260538656cf81d@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT), Suresh Rajagopalan
<sraja at cine.net> wrote:

> I just downloaded Sunone's compiler. That works fine.  So it is a gcc
> issue. I'll just have to recompile it for 5.10 I suppose. I dislike running
> fixincludes.

This worked for me for blastwave gcc 3.4.1 on b63:

cd /opt/csw/gcc3/libexec/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.9/3.4.1/install-tools
sudo ./mkheaders

I wasn't able to compile Apache without doing this.


From rsun at wlgore.com  Thu Aug 26 16:49:59 2004
From: rsun at wlgore.com (Richard D Sun)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:49:59 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd
Message-ID: <OF71924B14.84D86DBB-ON85256EFC.0050E473-85256EFC.00517857@wlgore.com>

Hi,

I'm hoping that one of you has encountered this, but I installed the 
pureftpd package and I can't get it to work properly on some of my 
servers.

The one difference I found is that we paid Sun to install several Solaris 
9 system and none of them are working.  The systems I set up, don't have 
this problem.

This is the error I get:

220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd [TLS] ----------
220-You are user number 1 of 50 allowed.
220-Local time is now 10:44. Server port: 21.
220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server.
220 You will be disconnected after 15 minutes of inactivity.
Name (ra:root): rsun
331 User rsun OK. Password required
Password:
421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
Login failed.
No control connection for command: No such file or directory
ftp>

Is there some sort of file I'm missing or some sort of permission problem?

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard D. Sun ??
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
mailto:rsun at wlgore.com (preferred)
Tel: (410)506-4168, Fax: (410)506-4400
http://www.gore.com


Gore Associates: Change the "Delivery Options" of your message to "High" 
Importance to page me immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040826/b0909afe/attachment-0001.html>

From sraja at cine.net  Thu Aug 26 17:37:50 2004
From: sraja at cine.net (Suresh Rajagopalan)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Compiling gcc from SUNWspro
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e0408260538656cf81d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408260835120.28156-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>

This is not a strictly blastwave question, but I hope someone has
encountered this:

In compiling gcc/3.3.3 from SUNWspro on Solaris 10, I am getting the
following error.  Is there a compiler flag setting to SUNWspro that fixes this?

Thanks
Suresh


make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
if [ x"" != x ]; then \
  cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include    sigsetmask.c -o
pic/sigsetmask.o; \
else true; fi
cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include   sigsetmask.c -o sigsetmask.o
"/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h", line 330: #error: "Compiler or options
invalid for pre-UNIX 03 X/Open applications     and pre-2001 POSIX
applications"
cc: acomp failed for sigsetmask.c
make[1]: *** [sigsetmask.o] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2




From Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM  Thu Aug 26 17:57:06 2004
From: Thomas.Jordan at Sun.COM (Thomas Jordan)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:57:06 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Compiling gcc from SUNWspro
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408260835120.28156-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0408260835120.28156-100000@hermosa1.cinenet.net>
Message-ID: <412E0852.7040106@Sun.Com>

try adding
-xc99=%none
to your CFLAGS


Suresh Rajagopalan wrote:
> This is not a strictly blastwave question, but I hope someone has
> encountered this:
> 
> In compiling gcc/3.3.3 from SUNWspro on Solaris 10, I am getting the
> following error.  Is there a compiler flag setting to SUNWspro that fixes this?
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
> if [ x"" != x ]; then \
>   cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include    sigsetmask.c -o
> pic/sigsetmask.o; \
> else true; fi
> cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include   sigsetmask.c -o sigsetmask.o
> "/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h", line 330: #error: "Compiler or options
> invalid for pre-UNIX 03 X/Open applications     and pre-2001 POSIX
> applications"
> cc: acomp failed for sigsetmask.c
> make[1]: *** [sigsetmask.o] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/src/dist/gcc-sol/gcc-3.3.3/libiberty'
> make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From stevel at sun.com  Thu Aug 26 19:59:50 2004
From: stevel at sun.com (Stephen Lau)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:59:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] anybody installed openssl package on Solaris 10/x86
	b63 (August Solaris Express)?
In-Reply-To: <20040826072246.GA26933@zerfleddert.de>
References: <cc67648e04082511244cae528b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825190439.GF283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<cc67648e04082514394d0558b0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040825220511.GK283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
	<20040826072246.GA26933@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <20040826175950.GS283787@jurassic.eng.sun.com>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:05:12PM -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
> > Yeah, I'd like to find out more about what's different in the CSWossl &
> > CSWtcl packages vs. the rest of the CSW packages before I file the bug
> > against Solaris' pkgadd first though... unfortunately, I don't know much
> > about the .pkg format so I don't know how to find this info out.
> 
> This bug has already been reported on comp.unix.solaris, and also
> happens with some of suns packages.
> To workaround the problem, the solution was to do a
> pkgadm revert
> 
> After this, it should work.
> See: <cg0g38$9sc$1 at new-usenet.uk.sun.com>

Ahhh...thanks for the solution/workaround Michael!!

cheers,
steve

-- 
stephen lau | stevel at sun.com | x80845 | http://tas.sfbay/~stevel


From Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM  Fri Aug 27 14:18:05 2004
From: Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM (Alexey Kuzmichev)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:18:05 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with fonts and libraries
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>

o- symbol gdk_threads_lock/unlock: referenced symbol not found

If I have /opt/csw/lib behind /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH I can not
start gimp, mozilla and gnumeric (symbol not found). Bluefish works fine
with excellent font rendering.

o- blured or aliased fonts

If I have /opt/csw/lib in front of /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if I
unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get blurred (gimp, mozilla, gnumeric) or badly
aliased (bluefish) fonts.

All blastwave packages have been upgraded to the latest available. The
latest Solaris patches have been installed with PatchManager.

# uname -a
SunOS tabla 5.9 Generic_117171-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10

Any ideas?

Thank you,
Alexey




From michael at blastwave.org  Fri Aug 27 15:23:20 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:23:20 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
Message-ID: <20040827132320.GA32445@zerfleddert.de>

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:18:05PM +0200, Alexey Kuzmichev wrote:
> If I have /opt/csw/lib behind /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH I can not
> start gimp, mozilla and gnumeric (symbol not found). Bluefish works fine
> with excellent font rendering.

Do not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

> If I have /opt/csw/lib in front of /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if I
> unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get blurred (gimp, mozilla, gnumeric) or badly
> aliased (bluefish) fonts.

run gnome-font-properties, which is part of control_center.

Regards,
  Michael


From michael.blatt at btopenworld.com  Fri Aug 27 17:09:51 2004
From: michael.blatt at btopenworld.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Michael=20Blatt?=)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:09:51 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [csw-users] rhythmbox and the gnome mixer
Message-ID: <20040827150951.94992.qmail@web86108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi all,
 
I re-discovered CSW a couple of weeks ago after over a year away from Solaris. I have installed the Gnome 2.6 meta-package and rhythmbox to go with it.
I remember reading that the Gnome mixer does not support Solaris as of yet, which is OK because we can use the sdtaudiocontrol and xmms anyway.
I suppose the problem is when you try rhythmbox, which uses gst-player (IIRC) and hence probably depends on the Gnome mixer.
So when I start rhythmbox I see CPU activity and then the usual "the applicaition has quit unexpectedly".
This happens both on Solaris 8 SPARC (Sun Ultra 5) and Solaris 9 x86 (some Compaq Deskpro).
Surely since the package exists, someone must have been able to run it? How do you do that without depending on gnome-mixer? Use the Xine backend maybe, but that is decided at compile time isn't it?
 
Thanks for any info or pointers,
 
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040827/4399e976/attachment-0001.html>

From Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM  Fri Aug 27 22:27:22 2004
From: Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM (Alexey Kuzmichev)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:27:22 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>


Hi Michael,

On Fri Aug 27 15:23:20 MEST 2004, Michael Gernoth wrote:

>> If I have /opt/csw/lib behind /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH I can not
>> start gimp, mozilla and gnumeric (symbol not found). Bluefish works fine
>> with excellent font rendering.
>
> Do not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

I know that it's not recommended to set this variable. I set it to prove
the fact that bundled /usr/lib (unlike /opt/csw/lib) libraries render
all fonts perfectly (but unfortunately can not be used with some applicatons).

>
>> If I have /opt/csw/lib in front of /usr/lib in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if I
>> unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get blurred (gimp, mozilla, gnumeric) or badly
>> aliased (bluefish) fonts.
>
>run gnome-font-properties, which is part of control_center.

gnome-font-properties "allows you to select the fonts to use in your
applications and desktop background." It does not affect
rendering/aliasing. BTW, gnome-font-properties does not change mozilla
or gimp fonts.

One correction. Gnumeric's font is not "blurred"  but as "broken" as
bluefish' one.

Thank you,
Alexey


From michael at blastwave.org  Fri Aug 27 22:58:43 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:58:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Re: Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>
Message-ID: <20040827205843.GA32076@zerfleddert.de>

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:27:22PM +0200, Alexey Kuzmichev wrote:
> gnome-font-properties "allows you to select the fonts to use in your
> applications and desktop background." It does not affect
> rendering/aliasing. BTW, gnome-font-properties does not change mozilla
> or gimp fonts.

In my version of /opt/csw/bin/gnome-font-properties I can configure
antialiasing. Clicking on details leads me to even more
rendering-settings (like which type of LCD I want to use with subpixel-
rendering).

Regards,
  Michael


From derek at trideja.com  Sat Aug 28 11:44:56 2004
From: derek at trideja.com (Derek Warren)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:44:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Other Solaris 10b63 Oddities
Message-ID: <p06110400bd5603d08511@[192.168.0.40]>

Yes, thanks, Mike, for the workaround for installing OpenSSL! 
However, I ran into a litt^H^H^H^Hbig fat snag.  Envision this:

# pkgadm revert
#

Hmm. All seems well, but...

# pkginfo
ERROR: The install database does not exist.

.... oh, crap. :)  Hmm. Can I reverse this?

# pkgadm upgrade
ERROR: The install database does not exist.

.... aaaaaargh!  Is this an anomaly or has anyone else had this 
happen to them?  I'm reinstalling Solaris 10b63 as I speak.  This 
time around I'll have more incentive to make a Flash archive of the 
installation in case pkgadm buggers things up again.


Packagelessly,
Derek
-- 


[ http://derek.trideja.com/buxton-sig.mov ]


From daniel at dseichter.de  Sat Aug 28 16:03:19 2004
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:03:19 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Error in GAIM 0.82
Message-ID: <1093701799.1917.2.camel@blade>

Hello,

since I'd upgraded to Gaim 0.82 I receive the following error:
(There was an error receiving this message)

Maybe this will be fixed in the Gaim 0.82.1 release?!

Daniel Seichter



From Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM  Sun Aug 29 01:13:02 2004
From: Alexey.Kuzmichev at Sun.COM (Alexey Kuzmichev)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:13:02 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [csw-users] Re: Problems with fonts and libraries
In-Reply-To: <20040827205843.GA32076@zerfleddert.de>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408271349190.22926@doom>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0408272204270.26640@doom>
	<20040827205843.GA32076@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0408281900070.27042@doom>

Actually I already played with subpixel smoothing before to no avail,
but anyways, I installed CSW gnome-font-properties and a bunch of
additional CSW libs and tried again. Here's the result:

o- Subpixel (LCD) - immediately breaks fonts (makes them unreadable) in
SOME applications (e.g.  gnome-font-properties, bluefish). CSW Mozilla
and other non CSW apps are not affected.

o- Hinting set to None - text is readable, but font shapes are horrible.
Mozilla and non-CSW apps are not affected again.

o- All other options do not change anything anywhere. Checked with 10x
magnifier :-) Mozilla's fonts are still blurred, bluefish ones are still
bad shaped.

The interesting thing is that non CSW apps or CSW apps with the standard
libs do not have problems with fonts.  Am I still doing anything wrong?

I'm using AFB card and LCD monitor.

Thank you,
Alexey

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Michael Gernoth wrote:

>On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:27:22PM +0200, Alexey Kuzmichev wrote:
>> gnome-font-properties "allows you to select the fonts to use in your
>> applications and desktop background." It does not affect
>> rendering/aliasing. BTW, gnome-font-properties does not change mozilla
>> or gimp fonts.
>
>In my version of /opt/csw/bin/gnome-font-properties I can configure
>antialiasing. Clicking on details leads me to even more
>rendering-settings (like which type of LCD I want to use with subpixel-
>rendering).
>
>Regards,
>  Michael
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

-- 
Alexey Kuzmichev
Sun Microsystems/EDS Global Internet Services Operations
+31-(0)33-451-6106 x76106 (CET) alekz at sun.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~