From michael at blastwave.org Wed Dec 1 15:14:07 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:14:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:16:46PM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > were crisp and clear.
>
> I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
Hmm, I can only guess...
What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts
true
Regards,
Michael
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Dec 1 17:40:17 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:40:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <4230-48307@sneakemail.com>
Thank you for the response.
I put this in my local.conf file, and restarted Evolution. The fonts
changed to a fixed width font, and are easier to read, but the letters
are still not right. It seems that the parts of the letters that are
curves or angles such as "V" or "S", have a jagged look to them.
I'll try some other settings, and see if I can get some more
information.
Thanks again.
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 15:14 +0100, Michael Gernoth
michael-at-blastwave.org |blastwave| wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:16:46PM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > > were crisp and clear.
> >
> > I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
>
> Hmm, I can only guess...
> What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
>
>
>
>
> /usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts
>
>
>
>
> true
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Tim Longo | Avaya Labs Research | 908 696 5123
From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Dec 1 20:24:53 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:24:53 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch>
On Wednesday, 01 Dec 2004 15:14 +0100, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > > were crisp and clear.
> >
> > I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
>
> Hmm, I can only guess...
> What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
[...]
It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
Cheers, Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Dec 1 22:45:15 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:45:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
<20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
On Wednesday, 01 Dec 2004 20:24 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
(I discussed that already with Michael on irc)
> > > > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > > > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > > > were crisp and clear.
> > >
> > > I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
> >
> > Hmm, I can only guess...
> > What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
>
> [...]
>
> It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
>
> http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
> http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
My fonts.conf, which was working fine during the last 6 month,
had an error. I removed the file in my home directory and it's
fine now.
Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Dec 1 23:08:49 2004
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:08:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
<20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch> <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
Message-ID:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
> >
> > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
> > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
>
> My fonts.conf, which was working fine during the last 6 month,
> had an error. I removed the file in my home directory and it's
> fine now.
Can you put up another snapshot image ?
Dennis
From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Dec 1 23:19:02 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:19:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To:
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
<20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch> <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <20041201221902.GB27368@dogan.ch>
On Wednesday, 01 Dec 2004 17:08 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > > It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
> > >
> > > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
> > > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
> >
> > My fonts.conf, which was working fine during the last 6 month,
> > had an error. I removed the file in my home directory and it's
> > fine now.
>
> Can you put up another snapshot image ?
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/good.png
Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From james at blastwave.org Thu Dec 2 18:19:52 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:19:52 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] gcc ISALIST problem
In-Reply-To: <86C6E520C12E52429ACBCB01546DF4D32D00@xchange1.phage.bcgsc.ca>
References: <86C6E520C12E52429ACBCB01546DF4D32D00@xchange1.phage.bcgsc.ca>
Message-ID: <20041202.17195200.1506313811@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 26/11/04, 20:52:50, Mark Mayo wrote regarding
[csw-users] gcc ISALIST problem:
> markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ gcc test.c
> markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ ./a.out
> ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal: ./a.out: /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/$ISALIST
> -R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST: token ISALIST could not be expanded
> test
Investigate further with truss. Here is the head of my truss:
$ truss a.out
execve("a.out", 0xFFBEF114, 0xFFBEF11C) argc = 1
resolvepath("/usr/lib/ld.so.1", "/usr/lib/ld.so.1", 1023) = 16
open("/var/ld/ld.config", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT
sysinfo(514, "sparcv9+vis sparcv9 sparcv8plus+vis sparcv8plus sparcv8
sparcv8-fsmuld sparcv7 sparc", 257) = 85
stat("/opt/csw/gcc3/lib/sparcv9+vis/libc.so.1", 0xFFBEE834) Err#2 ENOENT
stat("/opt/csw/gcc3/lib/sparcv9/libc.so.1", 0xFFBEE834) Err#2 ENOENT
Note the sysinfo call is when it gets the isalist from the system.
What does yours do?
From james at blastwave.org Fri Dec 3 15:45:38 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:45:38 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet>
References: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet>
Message-ID: <20041203.14453800.4197593640@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 26/11/04, 21:44:06, Robert Stampfli wrote
regarding [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
> The following post has created quite a flutter of comments in
> the newsgroup comp.unix.solaris. Can someone from blastwave
> comment? What can we do to help?
You might not have been aware of the level of personal financial
support that Dennis Clarke has put into the Blastwave project.
This is not fair nor sustainable and the fact is Dennis has an
immediate cash crisis.
Consider the worth of Blastwave to you and make a donation. You
have benefited from the services that Blastwave has given to you.
Just $10[1] from 1000 users[2] is $10,000.
If you use Blastwave at work make a donation in proportion to your
business. Consider the time and money you have saved and pass some
of that back to Blastwave. If only 100 businesses gave $100 that
would be another $10,000.
Make sure your contacts are aware of this and ask them to donate.
Tell your boss, colleagues and fellow Solaris users to chip in.
Hopefully funding can be found in the future but there will be no
future unless you act now and showing your support through a
donation is probably the best way of impressing potential commercial
partners.
James Lee.
Notes:
[1] Look up the prices of any piece of software like MSWord, Abobe
Acrobat or Photoshop and donate more than $10 to Blastwave.
[2] November web site stats shows 16,700 "sites" and 28,000 "visits".
The ibiblio.org mirror alone averages 7600 package downloads daily.
We know users are out there.
From amaier at blastwave.org Fri Dec 3 16:53:10 2004
From: amaier at blastwave.org (Alexander Maier)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:53:10 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <1102089190.28506.151.camel@belgien>
This could be a workaround:
% cat ~/.fonts.conf
true
true
Next release of CSWfconfig will address this issue.
Alexander
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 22:16 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
>
>
>
> Ihsan...
>
> Email message/mailbox attachment
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 22:16 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > were crisp and clear.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest some things to look at for font problems?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Dec 3 23:46:57 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:46:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <1102089190.28506.151.camel@belgien>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<1102089190.28506.151.camel@belgien>
Message-ID: <20041203224657.GA27729@dogan.ch>
On Friday, 03 Dec 2004 16:53 +0100, Alexander Maier wrote:
> This could be a workaround:
>
> % cat ~/.fonts.conf
>
>
>
>
> true
> true
>
>
Does that mean, that the following will disable antialiased fonts?
false
true
Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From rsun at wlgore.com Sun Dec 5 15:34:20 2004
From: rsun at wlgore.com (Richard D Sun)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:34:20 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet>
Message-ID:
I got my company to purchase a DVD set for a year. In fact, as long as
everything is web accessible, I don't even need the DVD's. So if you
reading this, please feel free not to send me a DVD during my subscription
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard D. Sun ??
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
mailto:rsun at wlgore.com (preferred)
Tel: (410)506-4168, Fax: (410)506-4400
http://www.gore.com
Gore Associates: Change the "Delivery Options" of your message to "High"
Importance to page me immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041205/d96474c5/attachment.html
From dave-blastwave at overbearing.org Mon Dec 6 02:26:40 2004
From: dave-blastwave at overbearing.org (dave-blastwave at overbearing.org)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <20041203.14453800.4197593640@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID:
Dear BlastWave users,
The service BlastWave provides is terrific and it would be very sad if Mr. Clarke has to fold the project.
I have a few questions about blastwave and I was wondering if anybody could answer them?
Where is the source code for these excellent packages? I used the apache2 package and found it to be A terrific build, but I wanted to make some small changes to the build flags. It looks like the link I followed to get the binaries:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/
doesn't have a subdirectory with a name like source or src. In contrast sunfreeware puts the source in the tree:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/freeware/SOURCES/
The license on most of this software does require that the source be downloadable from the same place you got the binaries.
If someone could point me to the right directory to get the source code I would be much obliged.
What exactly is the nature of the financial drain that BlastWave is having? Is it lack of administrative time? If so I might be willing to offer a few hours a month of volunteer administration. Is it the expense of web hosting? What is the required bandwidth? I might be in a position to colo a box or two for free if the site is being overloaded. If equipment is needed, what kind and how much?
Has anyone looked at NetBSD pkgsrc? This is an excellent resource that has managed to build 1618 packages on Solaris, albeit not as well integrated as the Blastwave packages:
ftp://ftp0.mh.bbc.co.uk/pub/pkgsrc/pkgstat/20041202.2358/broken.html
It struck me that it might be possible to use the pkgsrc builds as a base for .pkg format packages.
How are you managing dependencies with existing Sun packages? The Apache I installed from CSW did not check that an existing apache supplied by sun was already installed. Is there a method to the merge the dependency databases from Blastwave and pkginfo? If not what would be required to make this happen?
Keep up the excellent work guys, and good luck!
Regards,
-David Wilson
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, James Lee wrote:
> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:45:38 GMT
> From: James Lee
> Reply-To: questions and discussions
> To: questions and discussions
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
>
> On 26/11/04, 21:44:06, Robert Stampfli wrote
> regarding [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
>
> > The following post has created quite a flutter of comments in
> > the newsgroup comp.unix.solaris. Can someone from blastwave
> > comment? What can we do to help?
>
> You might not have been aware of the level of personal financial
> support that Dennis Clarke has put into the Blastwave project.
> This is not fair nor sustainable and the fact is Dennis has an
> immediate cash crisis.
>
>
> Consider the worth of Blastwave to you and make a donation. You
> have benefited from the services that Blastwave has given to you.
> Just $10[1] from 1000 users[2] is $10,000.
>
> If you use Blastwave at work make a donation in proportion to your
> business. Consider the time and money you have saved and pass some
> of that back to Blastwave. If only 100 businesses gave $100 that
> would be another $10,000.
>
> Make sure your contacts are aware of this and ask them to donate.
> Tell your boss, colleagues and fellow Solaris users to chip in.
>
>
> Hopefully funding can be found in the future but there will be no
> future unless you act now and showing your support through a
> donation is probably the best way of impressing potential commercial
> partners.
>
>
> James Lee.
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> [1] Look up the prices of any piece of software like MSWord, Abobe
> Acrobat or Photoshop and donate more than $10 to Blastwave.
>
> [2] November web site stats shows 16,700 "sites" and 28,000 "visits".
> The ibiblio.org mirror alone averages 7600 package downloads daily.
> We know users are out there.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 11:31:37 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:31:37 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Source Code Availibility
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 06/12/04, 01:26:40, wrote regarding Re:
[csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
> Where is the source code for these excellent packages?
A link to the source should be in the packages and can be extracted
with the pkginfo(1) or pkgparam(1):
$ pkginfo -l CSWapache2 | grep VENDOR
VENDOR: http://www.ibiblio.com/pub/mirrors/apache/httpd/ packaged
for CSW by Cory Omand
$ pkgparam CSWapache2 VENDOR
http://www.ibiblio.com/pub/mirrors/apache/httpd/ packaged for CSW by Cory
Omand
Follow the URL to the source. (I might have chosen to put
http://httpd.apache.org/ in the packages; Cory gives the URL of a
mirror.)
> I used the apache2 package and found it to be A terrific build, but
> I wanted to make some small changes to the build flags.
If you want something different to the current package make a
request for enhancement via http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/.
> The license on most of this software does require that the source
> be downloadable from the same place you got the binaries.
Most packages are covered by GPL but apache2 isn't one of them:
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
meet the following conditions:
So I presume CSW chooses the Object form and not Source form and has
no requirement to provide the Source form.
The GPL says:
3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:
...
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
customarily used for software interchange; or,
So there is no requirement to distribute the source with the packages.
If you want the source ask for it, then I say "that'll be a quid" and
send it. The Blastwave file server is retaining copies of GPL source
for the required 3 years should anyone make such a request.
Finally note there is no requirement for a CSW package to be GPL, open
source or even free (as in money).
James.
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 11:57:54 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:57:54 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Dependancy on Sun packages
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20041206.10575400.921521389@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 06/12/04, 01:26:40, wrote regarding Re:
[csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
fork()...
> How are you managing dependencies with existing Sun packages?
It is assumed that you have a full installation and all Sun the
packages are installed. Some CSW packages list SUNW dependancies but
remember there is nothing pkg-get can do to install them if they are
missing.
> The Apache I installed from CSW did not check that an existing
> apache supplied by sun was already installed.
There will be no file clash when installing any CSW package but port
numbers might clash. All of SUNWapchd, CSWapache and CSWapache2 can
be installed together but watch the port number when running together.
James.
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 6 12:45:32 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:45:32 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox not working anymore
Message-ID: <41B4465C.9050306@ericsson.com>
Hi,
After latest 'pkg-get -Uu' Firefox stopped working with th following output:
-----
% /opt/csw/bin/firefox
** (Gecko:14962): WARNING **: No builtin or dynamically loaded modules
were found. Pango will not work correctly. This probably means
there was an error in the creation of:
'/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
(Gecko:14962): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1561:
assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
** (Gecko:14962): CRITICAL **: file pango-engine.c: line 68: assertion
`PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed
** ERROR **: file shape.c: line 75: assertion failed:
(glyphs->num_glyphs > 0)
aborting...
Abort
-----
Anybody else seeing this? My own build of Thunderbird shows the same
behavior.
/MO
From dreyerja at uni-paderborn.de Mon Dec 6 13:04:12 2004
From: dreyerja at uni-paderborn.de (Jan Dreyer)
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:04:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Dependancy on Sun packages
In-Reply-To: <20041206.10575400.921521389@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References:
<20041206.10575400.921521389@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
On 06.12.2004 at 11:57 James Lee wrote:
> It is assumed that you have a full installation and all Sun the
> packages are installed. Some CSW packages list SUNW dependancies but
> remember there is nothing pkg-get can do to install them if they are
> missing.
I think in most cases CSW-packages are installed on servers (e.g. we
have /no/ Solaris-Workstations). So imo you can't assume a full
installation but a minimal installation.
I plan to implement the use of more then one "url"-line in pkg-get.conf
and building a sunw-tree on our apt-server (only open for our
university of course). We already have a subtree for our own packages
(OpenAFS etc.)
So there is (or: will be) a way to get the dependancies automagically
per pkg-get if these are mentioned in the package! For all developers:
though it's not part of the policy of CSW, PLEASE include
SUNW-dependancies.
Greetings
Jan Dreyer
- --
IMT (Zentrum Informations- und Medien-Technologien) +-----------+
| USE PGP! |\ O---m /|
Let the SUN shine in your heart ;-) | (key via server |/`-------'\|
- -> zustaendig fuer: Unix-Server, CA | or on request) +-----------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQbRKvGdIcsNB7AJxAQEK7wQAhfWajH0EpGQz5UT58tMvcUVdTq4v16ra
KVwQ7dg94wZiwXo0qzjjcry8B3MVUNcCwg4IJ2Xm+NW5IAspU4ceVgpf8kN5jU9w
avo/ecucKyrhOu3U8pAA28Bcr9vEVOJBbN74a8DGtVuubs9GWbVP4gaBTLUGdGCi
6Qcl7suBA9A=
=ZEP5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Mon Dec 6 14:49:11 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:49:11 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Hello,
Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution. :-(
---snip---
tray icon: created
there was an error in the creation of:
'/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
GLib-GObject: file gobject.c: line 1561: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
g_log: file pango-engine.c: line 68: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed
g_log: file shape.c: line 75: assertion failed: (glyphs->num_glyphs > 0)
Abort (core dumped)
---snip---
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 15:45:55 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:45:55 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 06/12/04, 13:49:11, Tim Longo wrote regarding
[csw-users] pango update:
> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
:-(
...nor firefox, qgview, xsane, pan, the lot...
Oh @#$%
DON'T update it.
Some emergency help before the US of A a wakes up (to testing?)
and because it's such a wobbler I've put the old pango is here:
http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
.1-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
download the old 1.4.1
pkgrm CSWlibpango
gunzip libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pkgadd -d libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 15:52:44 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:52:44 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID: <20041206.14524400.2343238002@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
> download the old 1.4.1
> pkgrm CSWlibpango
Whoops it's CSWpango - no "lib", should have tested my commands!
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 6 15:48:14 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:48:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID: <41B4712E.20309@ericsson.com>
Thanks a lot :D.
On 2004-12-06 15:45, James Lee wrote:
> On 06/12/04, 13:49:11, Tim Longo wrote regarding
> [csw-users] pango update:
>
>> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
> :-(
>
> ...nor firefox, qgview, xsane, pan, the lot...
>
> Oh @#$%
> DON'T update it.
>
> Some emergency help before the US of A a wakes up (to testing?)
> and because it's such a wobbler I've put the old pango is here:
>
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
> .1-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
> .1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> download the old 1.4.1
> pkgrm CSWlibpango
> gunzip libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pkgadd -d libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 6 15:47:36 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:47:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
References: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <41B47108.1050401@ericsson.com>
Or Firefox...
On 2004-12-06 14:49, Tim Longo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution. :-(
>
> ---snip---
>
> tray icon: created
> there was an error in the creation of:
> '/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
> You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
> GLib-GObject: file gobject.c: line 1561: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
> g_log: file pango-engine.c: line 68: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed
> g_log: file shape.c: line 75: assertion failed: (glyphs->num_glyphs > 0)
> Abort (core dumped)
>
> ---snip---
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
From aslakr at idi.ntnu.no Tue Dec 7 14:44:39 2004
From: aslakr at idi.ntnu.no (Aslak Raanes)
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:44:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
P? 6. des 2004 kl. 14:49 skrev Tim Longo:
> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
> :-(
>
> ---snip---
>
> tray icon: created
> there was an error in the creation of:
> '/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
> You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
pango-querymodules > /opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules
should make things work again.
--
Aslak Raanes
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Dec 7 15:09:04 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:09:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
References: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
Message-ID: <41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com>
On 12/07/04 02:44 PM, Aslak Raanes wrote:
> P? 6. des 2004 kl. 14:49 skrev Tim Longo:
>
>> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
>> :-(
>>
>> ---snip---
>>
>> tray icon: created
>> there was an error in the creation of:
>> '/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
>> You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
>
>
> pango-querymodules > /opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules
>
> should make things work again.
Not for me.
From michael at blastwave.org Tue Dec 7 15:32:15 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:32:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
<41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:09:04PM +0100, Mats Larsson wrote:
> Not for me.
Get fixed packages from:
http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/
Regards,
Michael
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Fri Dec 10 15:35:18 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:35:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Links in Evolution
In-Reply-To: <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
<41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com> <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <31843-88117@sneakemail.com>
Since my upgrade to Evolution 2.0.2, I notice that html email picture
links do not work. When I try using the "Load Images" option under
view->Message Display, I see the urls scroll by on the status line, but
the red "x" remains in the email. This was not a problem with versions
of Evolution prior to 2.0.2.
Any other suggestions about what I can check?
Thanks.
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Fri Dec 10 15:43:19 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:43:19 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] fontconfig
In-Reply-To: <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
<41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com> <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <27610-47413@sneakemail.com>
During the install of CSWfontconfig, I see the following error. It seems
I can run the command manually though. Any suggestions?
---snip---
[ verifying class ]
/etc/rc2.d/S95cswfconfig
## Executing postinstall script.
fc-cache is running now to build font information caches
this may take up to several minutes on slow workstations
/usr/bin/fc-cache: illegal option -- s
usage: /usr/bin/fc-cache [-fvV?] [--force] [--verbose] [--version]
[--help] [dirs]
Build font information caches in [dirs]
(all directories in font configuration by default).
-f, --force scan directories with apparently valid caches
-s, --system-only scan system-wide directories only
-v, --verbose display status information while busy
-V, --version display font config version and exit
-?, --help display this help and exit
Installation of was successful.
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Sun Dec 12 22:19:27 2004
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:19:27 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Latest mutt seems to be broken
Message-ID: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
The latest version of mutt-1.5.6,REV=2004.12.03 seems to be unable
to establish pop and imap connections. Anyone else experiencing
these problems?
The previous version, REV=2004.10.07 seems to work OK.
Rob
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Mon Dec 13 06:42:19 2004
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:42:19 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
Message-ID: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
As long as I'm on a roll: Is anyone else experiencing
a problem with the "Find" function of the latest CSW Firefox
(1.0,REV=2004.11.12)? Here's what I've been seeing:
When you hit CTRL-F, the Find toolbar (much improved over
the old Find window, thank you!) appears at the bottom of the
screen. If I then enter what I want to find and hit "Find
Next", nothing happens. I can, however, hit "Highlight"
and manually search through the document for the sequence.
Admittedly, I haven't played around with this in detail.
It may be broken due to one of the extensions I've loaded.
That's why I'm asking if others have observed this.
FWIW, I'm running Sparc Solaris 8.
Thanks,
Rob Stampfli
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 13 10:21:04 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:21:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
References: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
Message-ID: <41BD5F00.8010505@ericsson.com>
On 2004-12-13 06:42, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> As long as I'm on a roll: Is anyone else experiencing
> a problem with the "Find" function of the latest CSW Firefox
> (1.0,REV=2004.11.12)? Here's what I've been seeing:
>
> When you hit CTRL-F, the Find toolbar (much improved over
> the old Find window, thank you!) appears at the bottom of the
> screen. If I then enter what I want to find and hit "Find
> Next", nothing happens. I can, however, hit "Highlight"
> and manually search through the document for the sequence.
>
> Admittedly, I haven't played around with this in detail.
> It may be broken due to one of the extensions I've loaded.
> That's why I'm asking if others have observed this.
I do have similar problems. Couldn't find out why so I did an uninstall
of CSW Firefox and returned to my own build. I would prefer to use the
CSW Firefox at our site though.
From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Dec 13 10:42:15 2004
From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:42:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Latest mutt seems to be broken
In-Reply-To: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
Message-ID: <20041213094214.GK12944@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Hello,
we're tracking this off-list down.
Thomas
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Mon Dec 13 14:00:09 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:00:09 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet> <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
Message-ID: <21810-63484@sneakemail.com>
I've also noticed this behavior on my CSW install.
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 00:42 -0500, Robert Stampfli
res-at-colnet.cmhnet.org |blastwave| wrote:
> As long as I'm on a roll: Is anyone else experiencing
> a problem with the "Find" function of the latest CSW Firefox
> (1.0,REV=2004.11.12)? Here's what I've been seeing:
>
> When you hit CTRL-F, the Find toolbar (much improved over
> the old Find window, thank you!) appears at the bottom of the
> screen. If I then enter what I want to find and hit "Find
> Next", nothing happens. I can, however, hit "Highlight"
> and manually search through the document for the sequence.
>
> Admittedly, I haven't played around with this in detail.
> It may be broken due to one of the extensions I've loaded.
> That's why I'm asking if others have observed this.
>
> FWIW, I'm running Sparc Solaris 8.
From miker at readq.com Mon Dec 13 19:52:30 2004
From: miker at readq.com (Mike Russo)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:52:30 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <21810-63484@sneakemail.com>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet> <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
<21810-63484@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <41BDE4EE.1040204@readq.com>
Although I was using a sef-compiled build of FF, I had this problem
myself. What fixed it for me was creating a new profile. I imported my
bookmarks from my old profile and my find toolbar works now.
From noreply at lists.blastwave.org Tue Dec 28 03:05:26 2004
From: noreply at lists.blastwave.org (Post Office)
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:05:26 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Returned mail: see transcript for details
Message-ID: <20041227235205.29CA56F08@enterprise.dogan.ch>
The original message was received at Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:05:26 -0500
from lists.blastwave.org [52.109.137.211]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
users at lists.blastwave.org
----- Transcript of the session follows -----
... while talking to lists.blastwave.org.:
>>> DATA
<<< 400-aturner; %MAIL-E-OPENOUT, error opening !AS as output
<<< 400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: instruction.zip
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 29120 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041227/e2662ace/attachment.obj
From MAILER-DAEMON at aol.com Thu Dec 30 22:05:27 2004
From: MAILER-DAEMON at aol.com (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:05:27 EST
Subject: [csw-users] Mail Delivery Problem
Message-ID: <200412301610.741d46ece195@omr-m12.mx.aol.com>
Your mail to the following recipients could not be delivered because they are not accepting mail from users at lists.blastwave.org:
sarisweet
From michael at blastwave.org Wed Dec 1 15:14:07 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:14:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:16:46PM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > were crisp and clear.
>
> I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
Hmm, I can only guess...
What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts
true
Regards,
Michael
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Dec 1 17:40:17 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:40:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <4230-48307@sneakemail.com>
Thank you for the response.
I put this in my local.conf file, and restarted Evolution. The fonts
changed to a fixed width font, and are easier to read, but the letters
are still not right. It seems that the parts of the letters that are
curves or angles such as "V" or "S", have a jagged look to them.
I'll try some other settings, and see if I can get some more
information.
Thanks again.
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 15:14 +0100, Michael Gernoth
michael-at-blastwave.org |blastwave| wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:16:46PM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > > were crisp and clear.
> >
> > I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
>
> Hmm, I can only guess...
> What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
>
>
>
>
> /usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts
>
>
>
>
> true
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Tim Longo | Avaya Labs Research | 908 696 5123
From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Dec 1 20:24:53 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:24:53 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch>
On Wednesday, 01 Dec 2004 15:14 +0100, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > > were crisp and clear.
> >
> > I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
>
> Hmm, I can only guess...
> What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
[...]
It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
Cheers, Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Dec 1 22:45:15 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:45:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
<20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
On Wednesday, 01 Dec 2004 20:24 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
(I discussed that already with Michael on irc)
> > > > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > > > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > > > were crisp and clear.
> > >
> > > I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
> >
> > Hmm, I can only guess...
> > What happens if you put the following in /opt/csw/etc/fonts/local.conf:
>
> [...]
>
> It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
>
> http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
> http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
My fonts.conf, which was working fine during the last 6 month,
had an error. I removed the file in my home directory and it's
fine now.
Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Dec 1 23:08:49 2004
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:08:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
<20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch> <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
Message-ID:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
> >
> > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
> > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
>
> My fonts.conf, which was working fine during the last 6 month,
> had an error. I removed the file in my home directory and it's
> fine now.
Can you put up another snapshot image ?
Dennis
From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Dec 1 23:19:02 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:19:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To:
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<20041201141407.GA4515@zerfleddert.de>
<20041201192453.GA22162@dogan.ch> <20041201214515.GA26747@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <20041201221902.GB27368@dogan.ch>
On Wednesday, 01 Dec 2004 17:08 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > > It looks now different, but it's still not good for my eyes.
> > >
> > > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/before.png
> > > http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/after.png
> >
> > My fonts.conf, which was working fine during the last 6 month,
> > had an error. I removed the file in my home directory and it's
> > fine now.
>
> Can you put up another snapshot image ?
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/tmp/font-problem/good.png
Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From james at blastwave.org Thu Dec 2 18:19:52 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:19:52 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] gcc ISALIST problem
In-Reply-To: <86C6E520C12E52429ACBCB01546DF4D32D00@xchange1.phage.bcgsc.ca>
References: <86C6E520C12E52429ACBCB01546DF4D32D00@xchange1.phage.bcgsc.ca>
Message-ID: <20041202.17195200.1506313811@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 26/11/04, 20:52:50, Mark Mayo wrote regarding
[csw-users] gcc ISALIST problem:
> markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ gcc test.c
> markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ ./a.out
> ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal: ./a.out: /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/$ISALIST
> -R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST: token ISALIST could not be expanded
> test
Investigate further with truss. Here is the head of my truss:
$ truss a.out
execve("a.out", 0xFFBEF114, 0xFFBEF11C) argc = 1
resolvepath("/usr/lib/ld.so.1", "/usr/lib/ld.so.1", 1023) = 16
open("/var/ld/ld.config", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT
sysinfo(514, "sparcv9+vis sparcv9 sparcv8plus+vis sparcv8plus sparcv8
sparcv8-fsmuld sparcv7 sparc", 257) = 85
stat("/opt/csw/gcc3/lib/sparcv9+vis/libc.so.1", 0xFFBEE834) Err#2 ENOENT
stat("/opt/csw/gcc3/lib/sparcv9/libc.so.1", 0xFFBEE834) Err#2 ENOENT
Note the sysinfo call is when it gets the isalist from the system.
What does yours do?
From james at blastwave.org Fri Dec 3 15:45:38 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:45:38 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet>
References: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet>
Message-ID: <20041203.14453800.4197593640@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 26/11/04, 21:44:06, Robert Stampfli wrote
regarding [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
> The following post has created quite a flutter of comments in
> the newsgroup comp.unix.solaris. Can someone from blastwave
> comment? What can we do to help?
You might not have been aware of the level of personal financial
support that Dennis Clarke has put into the Blastwave project.
This is not fair nor sustainable and the fact is Dennis has an
immediate cash crisis.
Consider the worth of Blastwave to you and make a donation. You
have benefited from the services that Blastwave has given to you.
Just $10[1] from 1000 users[2] is $10,000.
If you use Blastwave at work make a donation in proportion to your
business. Consider the time and money you have saved and pass some
of that back to Blastwave. If only 100 businesses gave $100 that
would be another $10,000.
Make sure your contacts are aware of this and ask them to donate.
Tell your boss, colleagues and fellow Solaris users to chip in.
Hopefully funding can be found in the future but there will be no
future unless you act now and showing your support through a
donation is probably the best way of impressing potential commercial
partners.
James Lee.
Notes:
[1] Look up the prices of any piece of software like MSWord, Abobe
Acrobat or Photoshop and donate more than $10 to Blastwave.
[2] November web site stats shows 16,700 "sites" and 28,000 "visits".
The ibiblio.org mirror alone averages 7600 package downloads daily.
We know users are out there.
From amaier at blastwave.org Fri Dec 3 16:53:10 2004
From: amaier at blastwave.org (Alexander Maier)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:53:10 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <1102089190.28506.151.camel@belgien>
This could be a workaround:
% cat ~/.fonts.conf
true
true
Next release of CSWfconfig will address this issue.
Alexander
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 22:16 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the same problem here. Is a solution available for that?
>
>
>
> Ihsan...
>
> Email message/mailbox attachment
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 22:16 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution
> > are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts
> > were crisp and clear.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest some things to look at for font problems?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.blastwave.org
> > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Dec 3 23:46:57 2004
From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:46:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-maintainers] (fwd) [csw-users] FONTS
[qy1ggy802@sneakemail.com]
In-Reply-To: <1102089190.28506.151.camel@belgien>
References: <20041130211646.GA11375@dogan.ch>
<1102089190.28506.151.camel@belgien>
Message-ID: <20041203224657.GA27729@dogan.ch>
On Friday, 03 Dec 2004 16:53 +0100, Alexander Maier wrote:
> This could be a workaround:
>
> % cat ~/.fonts.conf
>
>
>
>
> true
> true
>
>
Does that mean, that the following will disable antialiased fonts?
false
true
Ihsan...
--
Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/
Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/
From rsun at wlgore.com Sun Dec 5 15:34:20 2004
From: rsun at wlgore.com (Richard D Sun)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:34:20 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet>
Message-ID:
I got my company to purchase a DVD set for a year. In fact, as long as
everything is web accessible, I don't even need the DVD's. So if you
reading this, please feel free not to send me a DVD during my subscription
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard D. Sun ??
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
mailto:rsun at wlgore.com (preferred)
Tel: (410)506-4168, Fax: (410)506-4400
http://www.gore.com
Gore Associates: Change the "Delivery Options" of your message to "High"
Importance to page me immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From dave-blastwave at overbearing.org Mon Dec 6 02:26:40 2004
From: dave-blastwave at overbearing.org (dave-blastwave at overbearing.org)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <20041203.14453800.4197593640@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID:
Dear BlastWave users,
The service BlastWave provides is terrific and it would be very sad if Mr. Clarke has to fold the project.
I have a few questions about blastwave and I was wondering if anybody could answer them?
Where is the source code for these excellent packages? I used the apache2 package and found it to be A terrific build, but I wanted to make some small changes to the build flags. It looks like the link I followed to get the binaries:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/
doesn't have a subdirectory with a name like source or src. In contrast sunfreeware puts the source in the tree:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/freeware/SOURCES/
The license on most of this software does require that the source be downloadable from the same place you got the binaries.
If someone could point me to the right directory to get the source code I would be much obliged.
What exactly is the nature of the financial drain that BlastWave is having? Is it lack of administrative time? If so I might be willing to offer a few hours a month of volunteer administration. Is it the expense of web hosting? What is the required bandwidth? I might be in a position to colo a box or two for free if the site is being overloaded. If equipment is needed, what kind and how much?
Has anyone looked at NetBSD pkgsrc? This is an excellent resource that has managed to build 1618 packages on Solaris, albeit not as well integrated as the Blastwave packages:
ftp://ftp0.mh.bbc.co.uk/pub/pkgsrc/pkgstat/20041202.2358/broken.html
It struck me that it might be possible to use the pkgsrc builds as a base for .pkg format packages.
How are you managing dependencies with existing Sun packages? The Apache I installed from CSW did not check that an existing apache supplied by sun was already installed. Is there a method to the merge the dependency databases from Blastwave and pkginfo? If not what would be required to make this happen?
Keep up the excellent work guys, and good luck!
Regards,
-David Wilson
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, James Lee wrote:
> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:45:38 GMT
> From: James Lee
> Reply-To: questions and discussions
> To: questions and discussions
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?
>
> On 26/11/04, 21:44:06, Robert Stampfli wrote
> regarding [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
>
> > The following post has created quite a flutter of comments in
> > the newsgroup comp.unix.solaris. Can someone from blastwave
> > comment? What can we do to help?
>
> You might not have been aware of the level of personal financial
> support that Dennis Clarke has put into the Blastwave project.
> This is not fair nor sustainable and the fact is Dennis has an
> immediate cash crisis.
>
>
> Consider the worth of Blastwave to you and make a donation. You
> have benefited from the services that Blastwave has given to you.
> Just $10[1] from 1000 users[2] is $10,000.
>
> If you use Blastwave at work make a donation in proportion to your
> business. Consider the time and money you have saved and pass some
> of that back to Blastwave. If only 100 businesses gave $100 that
> would be another $10,000.
>
> Make sure your contacts are aware of this and ask them to donate.
> Tell your boss, colleagues and fellow Solaris users to chip in.
>
>
> Hopefully funding can be found in the future but there will be no
> future unless you act now and showing your support through a
> donation is probably the best way of impressing potential commercial
> partners.
>
>
> James Lee.
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> [1] Look up the prices of any piece of software like MSWord, Abobe
> Acrobat or Photoshop and donate more than $10 to Blastwave.
>
> [2] November web site stats shows 16,700 "sites" and 28,000 "visits".
> The ibiblio.org mirror alone averages 7600 package downloads daily.
> We know users are out there.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 11:31:37 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:31:37 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Source Code Availibility
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 06/12/04, 01:26:40, wrote regarding Re:
[csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
> Where is the source code for these excellent packages?
A link to the source should be in the packages and can be extracted
with the pkginfo(1) or pkgparam(1):
$ pkginfo -l CSWapache2 | grep VENDOR
VENDOR: http://www.ibiblio.com/pub/mirrors/apache/httpd/ packaged
for CSW by Cory Omand
$ pkgparam CSWapache2 VENDOR
http://www.ibiblio.com/pub/mirrors/apache/httpd/ packaged for CSW by Cory
Omand
Follow the URL to the source. (I might have chosen to put
http://httpd.apache.org/ in the packages; Cory gives the URL of a
mirror.)
> I used the apache2 package and found it to be A terrific build, but
> I wanted to make some small changes to the build flags.
If you want something different to the current package make a
request for enhancement via http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/.
> The license on most of this software does require that the source
> be downloadable from the same place you got the binaries.
Most packages are covered by GPL but apache2 isn't one of them:
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
meet the following conditions:
So I presume CSW chooses the Object form and not Source form and has
no requirement to provide the Source form.
The GPL says:
3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:
...
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
customarily used for software interchange; or,
So there is no requirement to distribute the source with the packages.
If you want the source ask for it, then I say "that'll be a quid" and
send it. The Blastwave file server is retaining copies of GPL source
for the required 3 years should anyone make such a request.
Finally note there is no requirement for a CSW package to be GPL, open
source or even free (as in money).
James.
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 11:57:54 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:57:54 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Dependancy on Sun packages
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20041206.10575400.921521389@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 06/12/04, 01:26:40, wrote regarding Re:
[csw-users] Blastwave in trouble?:
fork()...
> How are you managing dependencies with existing Sun packages?
It is assumed that you have a full installation and all Sun the
packages are installed. Some CSW packages list SUNW dependancies but
remember there is nothing pkg-get can do to install them if they are
missing.
> The Apache I installed from CSW did not check that an existing
> apache supplied by sun was already installed.
There will be no file clash when installing any CSW package but port
numbers might clash. All of SUNWapchd, CSWapache and CSWapache2 can
be installed together but watch the port number when running together.
James.
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 6 12:45:32 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:45:32 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox not working anymore
Message-ID: <41B4465C.9050306@ericsson.com>
Hi,
After latest 'pkg-get -Uu' Firefox stopped working with th following output:
-----
% /opt/csw/bin/firefox
** (Gecko:14962): WARNING **: No builtin or dynamically loaded modules
were found. Pango will not work correctly. This probably means
there was an error in the creation of:
'/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
(Gecko:14962): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1561:
assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
** (Gecko:14962): CRITICAL **: file pango-engine.c: line 68: assertion
`PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed
** ERROR **: file shape.c: line 75: assertion failed:
(glyphs->num_glyphs > 0)
aborting...
Abort
-----
Anybody else seeing this? My own build of Thunderbird shows the same
behavior.
/MO
From dreyerja at uni-paderborn.de Mon Dec 6 13:04:12 2004
From: dreyerja at uni-paderborn.de (Jan Dreyer)
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:04:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Dependancy on Sun packages
In-Reply-To: <20041206.10575400.921521389@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References:
<20041206.10575400.921521389@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
On 06.12.2004 at 11:57 James Lee wrote:
> It is assumed that you have a full installation and all Sun the
> packages are installed. Some CSW packages list SUNW dependancies but
> remember there is nothing pkg-get can do to install them if they are
> missing.
I think in most cases CSW-packages are installed on servers (e.g. we
have /no/ Solaris-Workstations). So imo you can't assume a full
installation but a minimal installation.
I plan to implement the use of more then one "url"-line in pkg-get.conf
and building a sunw-tree on our apt-server (only open for our
university of course). We already have a subtree for our own packages
(OpenAFS etc.)
So there is (or: will be) a way to get the dependancies automagically
per pkg-get if these are mentioned in the package! For all developers:
though it's not part of the policy of CSW, PLEASE include
SUNW-dependancies.
Greetings
Jan Dreyer
- --
IMT (Zentrum Informations- und Medien-Technologien) +-----------+
| USE PGP! |\ O---m /|
Let the SUN shine in your heart ;-) | (key via server |/`-------'\|
- -> zustaendig fuer: Unix-Server, CA | or on request) +-----------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQbRKvGdIcsNB7AJxAQEK7wQAhfWajH0EpGQz5UT58tMvcUVdTq4v16ra
KVwQ7dg94wZiwXo0qzjjcry8B3MVUNcCwg4IJ2Xm+NW5IAspU4ceVgpf8kN5jU9w
avo/ecucKyrhOu3U8pAA28Bcr9vEVOJBbN74a8DGtVuubs9GWbVP4gaBTLUGdGCi
6Qcl7suBA9A=
=ZEP5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Mon Dec 6 14:49:11 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:49:11 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Hello,
Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution. :-(
---snip---
tray icon: created
there was an error in the creation of:
'/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
GLib-GObject: file gobject.c: line 1561: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
g_log: file pango-engine.c: line 68: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed
g_log: file shape.c: line 75: assertion failed: (glyphs->num_glyphs > 0)
Abort (core dumped)
---snip---
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 15:45:55 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:45:55 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
On 06/12/04, 13:49:11, Tim Longo wrote regarding
[csw-users] pango update:
> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
:-(
...nor firefox, qgview, xsane, pan, the lot...
Oh @#$%
DON'T update it.
Some emergency help before the US of A a wakes up (to testing?)
and because it's such a wobbler I've put the old pango is here:
http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
.1-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
download the old 1.4.1
pkgrm CSWlibpango
gunzip libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pkgadd -d libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 6 15:52:44 2004
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:52:44 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID: <20041206.14524400.2343238002@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
> download the old 1.4.1
> pkgrm CSWlibpango
Whoops it's CSWpango - no "lib", should have tested my commands!
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 6 15:48:14 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:48:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
References: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<20041206.14455500.1908798215@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
Message-ID: <41B4712E.20309@ericsson.com>
Thanks a lot :D.
On 2004-12-06 15:45, James Lee wrote:
> On 06/12/04, 13:49:11, Tim Longo wrote regarding
> [csw-users] pango update:
>
>> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
> :-(
>
> ...nor firefox, qgview, xsane, pan, the lot...
>
> Oh @#$%
> DON'T update it.
>
> Some emergency help before the US of A a wakes up (to testing?)
> and because it's such a wobbler I've put the old pango is here:
>
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
> .1-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/james/libpango-1.4
> .1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> download the old 1.4.1
> pkgrm CSWlibpango
> gunzip libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pkgadd -d libpango-1.4.1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 6 15:47:36 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:47:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
References: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <41B47108.1050401@ericsson.com>
Or Firefox...
On 2004-12-06 14:49, Tim Longo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution. :-(
>
> ---snip---
>
> tray icon: created
> there was an error in the creation of:
> '/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
> You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
> GLib-GObject: file gobject.c: line 1561: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
> g_log: file pango-engine.c: line 68: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed
> g_log: file shape.c: line 75: assertion failed: (glyphs->num_glyphs > 0)
> Abort (core dumped)
>
> ---snip---
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
From aslakr at idi.ntnu.no Tue Dec 7 14:44:39 2004
From: aslakr at idi.ntnu.no (Aslak Raanes)
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:44:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
P? 6. des 2004 kl. 14:49 skrev Tim Longo:
> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
> :-(
>
> ---snip---
>
> tray icon: created
> there was an error in the creation of:
> '/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
> You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
pango-querymodules > /opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules
should make things work again.
--
Aslak Raanes
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Dec 7 15:09:04 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:09:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
References: <20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
Message-ID: <41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com>
On 12/07/04 02:44 PM, Aslak Raanes wrote:
> P? 6. des 2004 kl. 14:49 skrev Tim Longo:
>
>> Updated libpango this morning, and now can't start gaim, or evolution.
>> :-(
>>
>> ---snip---
>>
>> tray icon: created
>> there was an error in the creation of:
>> '/opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules'
>> You may be able to recreate this file by running pango-querymodules.
>
>
> pango-querymodules > /opt/csw/etc/pango/pango.modules
>
> should make things work again.
Not for me.
From michael at blastwave.org Tue Dec 7 15:32:15 2004
From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth)
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:32:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pango update
In-Reply-To: <41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
<41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:09:04PM +0100, Mats Larsson wrote:
> Not for me.
Get fixed packages from:
http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/
Regards,
Michael
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Fri Dec 10 15:35:18 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:35:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Links in Evolution
In-Reply-To: <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
<41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com> <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <31843-88117@sneakemail.com>
Since my upgrade to Evolution 2.0.2, I notice that html email picture
links do not work. When I try using the "Load Images" option under
view->Message Display, I see the urls scroll by on the status line, but
the red "x" remains in the email. This was not a problem with versions
of Evolution prior to 2.0.2.
Any other suggestions about what I can check?
Thanks.
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Fri Dec 10 15:43:19 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:43:19 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] fontconfig
In-Reply-To: <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
References:
<20041206.10313700.4105377611@landeck.jamesipoos.com>
<20462-11097@sneakemail.com>
<243AD742-4856-11D9-9698-00039364C786@idi.ntnu.no>
<41B5B980.1020500@ericsson.com> <20041207143215.GA15394@zerfleddert.de>
Message-ID: <27610-47413@sneakemail.com>
During the install of CSWfontconfig, I see the following error. It seems
I can run the command manually though. Any suggestions?
---snip---
[ verifying class ]
/etc/rc2.d/S95cswfconfig
## Executing postinstall script.
fc-cache is running now to build font information caches
this may take up to several minutes on slow workstations
/usr/bin/fc-cache: illegal option -- s
usage: /usr/bin/fc-cache [-fvV?] [--force] [--verbose] [--version]
[--help] [dirs]
Build font information caches in [dirs]
(all directories in font configuration by default).
-f, --force scan directories with apparently valid caches
-s, --system-only scan system-wide directories only
-v, --verbose display status information while busy
-V, --version display font config version and exit
-?, --help display this help and exit
Installation of was successful.
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Sun Dec 12 22:19:27 2004
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:19:27 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Latest mutt seems to be broken
Message-ID: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
The latest version of mutt-1.5.6,REV=2004.12.03 seems to be unable
to establish pop and imap connections. Anyone else experiencing
these problems?
The previous version, REV=2004.10.07 seems to work OK.
Rob
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Mon Dec 13 06:42:19 2004
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:42:19 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
Message-ID: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
As long as I'm on a roll: Is anyone else experiencing
a problem with the "Find" function of the latest CSW Firefox
(1.0,REV=2004.11.12)? Here's what I've been seeing:
When you hit CTRL-F, the Find toolbar (much improved over
the old Find window, thank you!) appears at the bottom of the
screen. If I then enter what I want to find and hit "Find
Next", nothing happens. I can, however, hit "Highlight"
and manually search through the document for the sequence.
Admittedly, I haven't played around with this in detail.
It may be broken due to one of the extensions I've loaded.
That's why I'm asking if others have observed this.
FWIW, I'm running Sparc Solaris 8.
Thanks,
Rob Stampfli
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Dec 13 10:21:04 2004
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:21:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
References: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
Message-ID: <41BD5F00.8010505@ericsson.com>
On 2004-12-13 06:42, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> As long as I'm on a roll: Is anyone else experiencing
> a problem with the "Find" function of the latest CSW Firefox
> (1.0,REV=2004.11.12)? Here's what I've been seeing:
>
> When you hit CTRL-F, the Find toolbar (much improved over
> the old Find window, thank you!) appears at the bottom of the
> screen. If I then enter what I want to find and hit "Find
> Next", nothing happens. I can, however, hit "Highlight"
> and manually search through the document for the sequence.
>
> Admittedly, I haven't played around with this in detail.
> It may be broken due to one of the extensions I've loaded.
> That's why I'm asking if others have observed this.
I do have similar problems. Couldn't find out why so I did an uninstall
of CSW Firefox and returned to my own build. I would prefer to use the
CSW Firefox at our site though.
From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Dec 13 10:42:15 2004
From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:42:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Latest mutt seems to be broken
In-Reply-To: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet>
Message-ID: <20041213094214.GK12944@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Hello,
we're tracking this off-list down.
Thomas
From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Mon Dec 13 14:00:09 2004
From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:00:09 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet> <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
Message-ID: <21810-63484@sneakemail.com>
I've also noticed this behavior on my CSW install.
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 00:42 -0500, Robert Stampfli
res-at-colnet.cmhnet.org |blastwave| wrote:
> As long as I'm on a roll: Is anyone else experiencing
> a problem with the "Find" function of the latest CSW Firefox
> (1.0,REV=2004.11.12)? Here's what I've been seeing:
>
> When you hit CTRL-F, the Find toolbar (much improved over
> the old Find window, thank you!) appears at the bottom of the
> screen. If I then enter what I want to find and hit "Find
> Next", nothing happens. I can, however, hit "Highlight"
> and manually search through the document for the sequence.
>
> Admittedly, I haven't played around with this in detail.
> It may be broken due to one of the extensions I've loaded.
> That's why I'm asking if others have observed this.
>
> FWIW, I'm running Sparc Solaris 8.
From miker at readq.com Mon Dec 13 19:52:30 2004
From: miker at readq.com (Mike Russo)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:52:30 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox find problem?
In-Reply-To: <21810-63484@sneakemail.com>
References: <20041212211927.GA13448@colnet> <20041213054218.GA14273@colnet>
<21810-63484@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID: <41BDE4EE.1040204@readq.com>
Although I was using a sef-compiled build of FF, I had this problem
myself. What fixed it for me was creating a new profile. I imported my
bookmarks from my old profile and my find toolbar works now.
From noreply at lists.blastwave.org Tue Dec 28 03:05:26 2004
From: noreply at lists.blastwave.org (Post Office)
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:05:26 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Returned mail: see transcript for details
Message-ID: <20041227235205.29CA56F08@enterprise.dogan.ch>
The original message was received at Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:05:26 -0500
from lists.blastwave.org [52.109.137.211]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
users at lists.blastwave.org
----- Transcript of the session follows -----
... while talking to lists.blastwave.org.:
>>> DATA
<<< 400-aturner; %MAIL-E-OPENOUT, error opening !AS as output
<<< 400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: instruction.zip
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 29120 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From MAILER-DAEMON at aol.com Thu Dec 30 22:05:27 2004
From: MAILER-DAEMON at aol.com (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:05:27 EST
Subject: [csw-users] Mail Delivery Problem
Message-ID: <200412301610.741d46ece195@omr-m12.mx.aol.com>
Your mail to the following recipients could not be delivered because they are not accepting mail from users at lists.blastwave.org:
sarisweet