From zizban at adelphia.net Wed Feb 1 03:14:27 2006 From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:14:27 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD Message-ID: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 03:16:57 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:16:57 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> Message-ID: On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: > How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a > folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. try pkgadd -d `pwd` see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of packages to install. Dennis From zizban at adelphia.net Wed Feb 1 03:46:18 2006 From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:46:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: >> How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a >> folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. > > try > > pkgadd -d `pwd` > > see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of > packages to install. > I get: pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed - open of failed, errno=2 pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from From zizban at adelphia.net Wed Feb 1 03:46:18 2006 From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:46:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: >> How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a >> folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. > > try > > pkgadd -d `pwd` > > see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of > packages to install. > I get: pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed - open of failed, errno=2 pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from From nlucier at math.purdue.edu Wed Feb 1 04:11:15 2006 From: nlucier at math.purdue.edu (Neal A. Lucier) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:11:15 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <20060128.13471900.1110454661@landeck.jamesipoos.com> References: <43DA6994.8000008@math.purdue.edu> <20060128.13471900.1110454661@landeck.jamesipoos.com> Message-ID: <43E026D3.3040700@math.purdue.edu> James Lee wrote: > On 27/01/06, 18:42:28, Neal "A." Lucier wrote > regarding [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10: > >> My NFS server, where I install all the CSW packages, is running Solaris >> 10; however, all my clients are running Solaris 9. > >> This is causing some apps to fail in weird ways and others are failing >> in perfectly normal ways, like not being able to find the correct >> version of zlib. > >> So, I want to install all the 5.9 packages on my NFS server instead of >> the 5.10 packages. It looks like I could just change the following line >> in /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get: >> OSREV=`uname -r` >> to: >> OSREV=5.9 > >> Is this all I have to do and everything will "just work"? > > No. The OSREV is where pkg-get looks for the packages to download. > It forms a URL like $MIRROR/$CPU/$OSREV/$PACKAGE. This allows for it > to download packages specifically for your arch. Currently there are > no differences between 5.8, 5.9 and 5.10 and if you look closely you > will see that for stable the directories are symbolic links to 5.8, > (warning, this might change in the future). The reason for your > problems must be something else. > > Some packages compensate for the one file suits all arches by having a > postinstall or classes that do different things depending on the osrev, > sendmail is one example. I expect most of these are doing things in > /etc/ which you are not exporting anyway. I can see no reason why zlib > would have problems. > > Running ldd sometimes shows programs looking for a zlib version that > it can't find but this doesn't matter, ignore this: > > libz.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) > James, Thank you for your response. In checking unstable/sparc/5.10/ again I see that there are only 2 pkgs built for 5.10 (flightgear_base and tkdiff), neither of which I use, and I was unaware that the libz message didn't matter. The problem I was having was with: /opt/csw/bin/convert filename.ps filename.jpg producing bad jpg files. The user reported it working on 5.10 but not 5.9 when in reality '/usr/sfw/bin/convert' works on 5.10 and '/opt/csw/bin/convert' fails on both. I will see if I can get some test .ps files and perhaps file a bug report once I figure out more. Thanks, Neal From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 1 10:27:21 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:27:21 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <43E07EF9.4090507@wbonnet.net> hi >I get: >pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed > - open of failed, errno=2 >pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from >_______________________________________________ > > Are you sure that you used backquotes and not simple quote ? It looks like pkgadd tried to install package pwd, instead of looking in the current directory to find some packages. Kind regards, -- William http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3172 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060201/30e9a5f1/attachment.bin From james at blastwave.org Wed Feb 1 11:00:57 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:00:57 GMT Subject: [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <43E026D3.3040700@math.purdue.edu> References: <43DA6994.8000008@math.purdue.edu> <20060128.13471900.1110454661@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <43E026D3.3040700@math.purdue.edu> Message-ID: <20060201.10005700.1020853563@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/02/06, 03:11:15, Neal "A." Lucier wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10: > Thank you for your response. In checking unstable/sparc/5.10/ again I > see that there are only 2 pkgs built for 5.10 (flightgear_base and > tkdiff), neither of which I use, and I was unaware that the libz message > didn't matter. Those 2 package are just wrongly labelled by naughty maintainers. They contain "all" arch files so no compilation and linking to system libs was done. The same package files are use for 5.8 and 5.9. > The problem I was having was with: > /opt/csw/bin/convert filename.ps filename.jpg > producing bad jpg files. Workarounds. Look in www.blastwave.org/testing/ and get: graphicsmagick-1.1.7-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz graphicsmagick-1.1.7-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Ref: http://www.graphicsmagick.org It's built in coexist mode (with imagemagick) so run: $ /opt/csw/bin/gm convert filename.ps filename.jpg graphicsmagick does several things better than imagemagick, especially multi-page conversion (not using 99GB of RAM). It's quicker too. Try using just Ghostscript to convert, after all the above only delegate the format conversions: $ gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=jpeg -r72 -sOutputFile=out.jpeg in.ps Ref: file:///opt/csw/doc/ghostscript/Devices.htm#JFIF James. From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Wed Feb 1 15:24:10 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:24:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <43E0C48A.1060701@cognigencorp.com> instead of using "pkgadd -d `pwd` SUNWpkgname" try "pkgadd -d . SUNWpkgname" instead. Chris Turkel wrote: > On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > >>On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: >> >>>How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a >>>folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. >> >>try >> >>pkgadd -d `pwd` >> >>see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of >>packages to install. >> > > > I get: > pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed > - open of failed, errno=2 > pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 18:15:11 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:11 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] typo in pkg-get package Message-ID: The pkg-get package linked to in the HOWTO has a typo in the default pkg-get.conf file. There is a space after the "=" in the secondary mirror, so when you uncomment this line, it produces a warning that happily scrolls off of the screen # secondary US mirror #url= http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable should be # secondary US mirror #url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable On a related note, should the default be unstable, or stable? -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From tim.smith at degreec.com Wed Feb 1 18:09:58 2006 From: tim.smith at degreec.com (Tim Smith) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:09:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] typo in pkg-get package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43E0EB66.6030305@degreec.com> I've been using the stable, and had zero problems, for whatever its worth. Mark McCoy wrote: > The pkg-get package linked to in the HOWTO has a typo in the default > pkg-get.conf file. There is a space after the "=" in the secondary > mirror, so when you uncomment this line, it produces a warning that > happily scrolls off of the screen > > # secondary US mirror > #url= http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > should be > > # secondary US mirror > #url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > On a related note, should the default be unstable, or stable? > -- > Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek > > "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put > into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am > not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that > could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From pfelecan at blastwave.org Wed Feb 1 19:50:20 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:50:20 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060201 CVS in testing Message-ID: As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060201-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060201-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package once a month, until the public release. Enjoy -- Peter From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 19:58:13 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:58:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] typo in pkg-get package In-Reply-To: <43E0EB66.6030305@degreec.com> References: <43E0EB66.6030305@degreec.com> Message-ID: I'm referring not to the repository, but the default config file in the pkg_get.pkg that is linked to on the HOWTO page. If you install that package on a fresh machine, uncomment the secondary US mirror line, and do a 'pkg-get -U' you will see what I mean. I've always just known to delete that space, but after installing it on about half a dozen machines in the last few months it is one of those little annoyances ;-) On 2/1/06, Tim Smith wrote: > I've been using the stable, and had zero problems, for whatever its worth. > > Mark McCoy wrote: > > The pkg-get package linked to in the HOWTO has a typo in the default > > pkg-get.conf file. There is a space after the "=" in the secondary > > mirror, so when you uncomment this line, it produces a warning that > > happily scrolls off of the screen > > > > # secondary US mirror > > #url= http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > > > should be > > > > # secondary US mirror > > #url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > > > On a related note, should the default be unstable, or stable? -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 23:54:52 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:54:52 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OT: mod_fastcgi Message-ID: If there is anyone on this list who has compiled mod_fastcgi against the ap2_worker blastwave package please contact me off-list. It should be a straightforward compile, but I keep getting an error. -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 2 01:02:05 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:02:05 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060201 CVS in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43E14BFD.7090601@blastwave.org> Peter FELECAN wrote: > As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in > the testing area: Peter, Quite some time ago, I compiled exuberant ctags, in order to use ctags with vim. It turns out, however, that emacs includes it's own copy of ctags/etags. Is there any way to store the emacs ctags/etags in a private directory so only emacs has access to them, so I can have a ctags package install exuberant ctags into /opt/csw/bin? Thoughts? Cory. NOTE: There is a copy of my ctags package in /export/medusa/comand/staging/ctags. -- Cory Omand From pfelecan at blastwave.org Thu Feb 2 07:05:00 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:05:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060201 CVS in testing In-Reply-To: <43E14BFD.7090601@blastwave.org> (Cory Omand's message of "Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:02:05 -0800") References: <43E14BFD.7090601@blastwave.org> Message-ID: Cory Omand writes: > Peter FELECAN wrote: >> As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in >> the testing area: > > Peter, > > Quite some time ago, I compiled exuberant ctags, in order to use ctags > with vim. It turns out, however, that emacs includes it's own copy of > ctags/etags. Is there any way to store the emacs ctags/etags in a > private directory so only emacs has access to them, so I can have a > ctags package install exuberant ctags into /opt/csw/bin? > > Thoughts? Cory, I think that we already had this discussion. My opinion about this is: - Emacs ctags/etags is also used by other software --- not having it naturally accessible is uncomfortable; - if "exuberant ctags" is feature wise equivalent to the ctags version we can consider an "alternative" mechanism --- it permits to choose which ctags is used; Could you fill a feature request in mantis and stating clearly what is your desired behaviour? -- Peter From realmcking at gmail.com Thu Feb 2 16:35:20 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:35:20 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OT: mod_fastcgi Message-ID: Has anyone on this list used mod_fastcgi with the ap2_worker apache package? I have tried both the Makefile.AP2 that ships with mod_fastcgi and the "by hand" method of running "apxs -o mod_fastcgi.so -c *.c" and all I ever get is a .la file. I've been googling for hours now, and I can't find anyone else with a similar problem. :-( -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From a.cervellin at acm.org Thu Feb 2 21:48:51 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:48:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] libpcap 0.9.4 sparc available for testing Message-ID: <43E27033.8090702@acm.org> libpcap 0.9.4 sparc is now available for testing in http://www.blastwave.org/testing it would be great if anyone could test it, especially the sparcv8plus and sparcv9 libs. From suvsthyfju at hotmail.com Sun Feb 5 03:09:40 2006 From: suvsthyfju at hotmail.com (Frederick Kennedy) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:09:40 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Re [4]: Message-ID: <20060205021531.41988880EE@a.mx.projectdream.org> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060204/5d792f5f/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: phantom.GIF Type: image/gif Size: 10554 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060204/5d792f5f/attachment.gif From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 6 15:46:49 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:46:49 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] openldap_rt package problem Message-ID: <20060206084649.0000025c@sws602.mcsun.local> There is a problem with the CSWoldaprt - openldap_rt version 2.3.17 package that is in the unstable catalog today. I put an update for openldap_rt in testing. If you update from the unstable catalog, please replace openldap_rt version 2.3.17 with version 2.3.17,REV=2006.02.06 from http://www.blastwave.org/testing. The full urls are (may have wrapped): http://www.blastwave.org/testing/openldap_rt-2.3.17,REV=2006.02.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/openldap_rt-2.3.17,REV=2006.02.06-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Only sparc is affected; and then only when one of the several packages using the old 2.1.30 client libraries is run. Sorry for the problem, Alex -- From mark.round at gmail.com Mon Feb 6 16:16:16 2006 From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:16:16 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] New PostgreSQL 8.1.2 packages available Message-ID: <7b46f0de0602060716m1b32030dj2b5b0dd9f5f42297@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, New PostgreSQL and related packages (postgresql, libpq and postgresqlcontrib) have been released to the "unstable" tree. These packages bump the version to 8.1.2, and include a number of important bug fixes. Of particular importance is the resolution of a bug present in previous versions of PostgreSQL that could lead to data loss - for more details, please see the 8.1.2 release announcment[1]. A dump/restore is not required for those already running 8.1.x, unless you are affected by the locale or plperl issues described in the release notes. Thanks, -Mark mark at blastwave.org [1]=http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/release.html#RELEASE-8-1-2 From Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM Mon Feb 6 20:15:56 2006 From: Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM (Bob Doolittle) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:15:56 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing Message-ID: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> Hi, I seem to be encountering no end of missing package dependencies when trying to run ethereal. First it was missing the latest libcrypto.so from the openssl package. I was able to figure that out because I had an older version installed already so could identify the package needing updating via /var/sadm/install/contents. But now I am missing libpangocairo-1.0.so.0, and I don't have this anywhere on my system, so don't know what package to install. Also, using the search page on blastwave (http://www.blastwave.org/search.php) doesn't show anything. Isn't pkg-get supposed to handle all dependencies automatically? Is the package dependency info for ethereal broken somehow? I tried to clean everything up by doing pkgrm CSWethereal, and then pkg-get -i ethereal, but am still missing these dependencies... Finally - there's a new version of ethereal available (0.10.14). The version on blastwave is 0.10.13. Thanks for any help, Bob From Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM Mon Feb 6 20:22:58 2006 From: Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM (Bob Doolittle) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:22:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing In-Reply-To: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> References: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <43E7A212.3070503@Sun.COM> Never mind - updating libpango did the trick. I still wonder why pkg-get didn't handle the dependencies properly for me, however. -Bob Bob Doolittle wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to be encountering no end of missing > package dependencies when trying to run > ethereal. > > First it was missing the latest libcrypto.so from > the openssl package. I was able to figure that > out because I had an older version installed > already so could identify the package > needing updating via /var/sadm/install/contents. > > But now I am missing libpangocairo-1.0.so.0, > and I don't have this anywhere on my system, > so don't know what package to install. Also, > using the search page on blastwave > (http://www.blastwave.org/search.php) > doesn't show anything. > > Isn't pkg-get supposed to handle all dependencies > automatically? Is the package dependency info > for ethereal broken somehow? I tried to clean > everything up by doing pkgrm CSWethereal, > and then pkg-get -i ethereal, but am still missing > these dependencies... > > Finally - there's a new version of ethereal available > (0.10.14). The version on blastwave is 0.10.13. > > Thanks for any help, > Bob > > From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 20:37:09 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:37:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing In-Reply-To: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> References: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <43E7A565.4050406@acm.org> Bob Doolittle ha scritto: > Hi, > > Isn't pkg-get supposed to handle all dependencies > automatically? Is the package dependency info > for ethereal broken somehow? I tried to clean > everything up by doing pkgrm CSWethereal, > and then pkg-get -i ethereal, but am still missing > these dependencies... > > Finally - there's a new version of ethereal available > (0.10.14). The version on blastwave is 0.10.13. please can you try the ethereal version on http://www.blastwave.org/testing ? try it and let me know if you still have problems. Dependencies to be installed are: P CSWggettext P CSWglib2 P CSWgtk2 P CSWiconv P CSWlibpcap P CSWpango P CSWpcre P CSWzlib From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 20:40:28 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:40:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing In-Reply-To: <43E7A212.3070503@Sun.COM> References: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> <43E7A212.3070503@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <43E7A62C.2040809@acm.org> Bob Doolittle ha scritto: > Never mind - updating libpango did the trick. > I still wonder why pkg-get didn't handle the > dependencies properly for me, however. Good to know :) Anyway i'm working to release 0.10.14, it will be available in the unstable tree ASAP. From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 22:11:11 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:11:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ethereal 0.10.14 Message-ID: <43E7BB6F.2090002@acm.org> ethereal 0.10.14 is now available on www.blastwave.org/testing for sparc and x86. anyone who had problems with the previous version is welcome to test this new pkg. :) Dependencies are: P CSWggettext P CSWglib2 P CSWgtk2 P CSWiconv P CSWlibpcap P CSWpango P CSWpcre P CSWzlib thanks, alessio From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 22:46:14 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:46:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pound 2.0.1 Message-ID: <43E7C3A6.7060309@acm.org> Pound 2.0.1 is now available for testing on www.blastwave.org/testing for both sparc & x86 From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Tue Feb 7 18:56:03 2006 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:56:03 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] kde: segmentation fault when compiling kile Message-ID: <43E8DF33.1090507@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i'm trying to compile kile, a front-end for latex http://kile.sourceforge.net/ I had installed kde from unstable sources (url=http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable) I am on solaris 10 sparc machine Here is the error: ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw/kde-gcc --with-qt-dir=/opt/csw/kde-gcc ... in config.log: configure:30747: /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/uic -L /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -impl actest.h actest.ui > actest.cpp ./configure: line 30748: 10796 Segmentation Fault /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/uic -L /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -impl actest.h actest.ui >actest.cpp here my packages: kdebase_gcc 3.4.3,REV=2006.01.08 kde_gcc 3.4.2,REV=2005.09.18 CSWqtgcc 3.3.4 kdelibs_gcc 3.4.2 i read the precedent thread about gcc, but don't understand how it applies to me This compilation worked well before i upgrade all my blastwave packages. If anybody can help, thanks in advance gerard From pfriedman at umuc.edu Wed Feb 8 22:41:30 2006 From: pfriedman at umuc.edu (Peter Friedman) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:41:30 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list Message-ID: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Yesterday, I tried to dive into Blastwave by putting together an apache2/php/mysql install on my sparc Solaris 8 system. I downloaded the mysql4rt, apache2, php5, php5_mysql, and ap2_modphp5 packages. I created two simple scripts to test the installation, one which just contains a call to phpinfo(), and another which attempts to connect to an existing mysql database. The first script works, and reports PHP version 5.1.2, but does not show that the mysql library is available. The mysql test script fails, and "Call to undefined function mysql_connect()" appears in the Apache log. Also, in the Apache log at server startup, there are multiple "Unable to initialize module" errors. As an additional test, I ran the scripts using the command line php (/opt/csw/bin/php5). Both scripts ran without problems. I noticed that the phpinfo() indicated a php version of 5.0.5. The problem, apparently, is that the version of php5 and php5_mysql is behind the version of php in ap2_modphp5. The errors in the Apache log show that the modphp5 module refuses to load various libraries, mysql included, due to a version mismatch. On http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php the versions of the latest packages involved are reported as: ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 php5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 php5_mysql 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 However, even after updating my package catalog with pkg-get -U, it appears that the actual versions of the available packages are: ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 php5 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 php5_mysql 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 I visited several mirror sites and pulled down their catalog files, and also looked at the names of the actual files. On all the mirrors, the php5 and php5_mysql packages were at version 5.0.5. From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Feb 8 23:10:36 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:10:36 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Message-ID: On 2/8/06, Peter Friedman wrote: > Yesterday, I tried to dive into Blastwave by putting together an > apache2/php/mysql install on my sparc Solaris 8 system. I downloaded the > mysql4rt, apache2, php5, php5_mysql, and ap2_modphp5 packages. Out of curiosity .. what do you mean by "downloaded" ? Do you mean that you typed pkg-get -i apache2 ? Dennis From pfriedman at umuc.edu Wed Feb 8 23:16:08 2006 From: pfriedman at umuc.edu (Peter Friedman) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:16:08 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Message-ID: <43EA6DA8.4080004@umuc.edu> Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Out of curiosity .. what do you mean by "downloaded" ? > > Do you mean that you typed pkg-get -i apache2 ? Yes, that's right. Pretend that I said "installed via pkg-get". From comand at blastwave.org Wed Feb 8 23:22:07 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:22:07 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Message-ID: <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> Peter Friedman wrote: > On http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php the versions of the latest > packages involved are reported as: > ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > php5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > php5_mysql 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > > However, even after updating my package catalog with pkg-get -U, it > appears that the actual versions of the available packages are: > ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > php5 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 > php5_mysql 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. Sorry for any inconvenience, C. -- Cory Omand From dvm105 at psu.edu Wed Feb 8 23:28:02 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:28:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <43EA7072.9060308@psu.edu> Cory Omand wrote: > The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try > updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. Is there going to be any permanent fix to this catalog sync'ing problem? It seems to be cropping up every week these days. -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From pfriedman at umuc.edu Wed Feb 8 23:39:44 2006 From: pfriedman at umuc.edu (Peter Friedman) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:39:44 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <43EA7330.9060703@umuc.edu> Cory Omand wrote: > > The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try > updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. I just want to confirm, in case I'm missing something. When you say "try updating your local catalog", do you mean pkg-get -U or something else? From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 00:08:17 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] ANNOUNCE: Package Update Underway Message-ID: <43EA79E1.6040402@blastwave.org> Quite a few new packages are currently being released into the blastwave unstable catalog this week. Please be aware that the unstable catalog may be temporarily out of sync. If you encounter any issues related to package versions, please try updating your local catalog, and check http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/mirrorStatus.jsp to ensure that your selected mirror is up to date. The following is a summary of changes making their way to the catalog -- please note that some packages listed below may not be available at your local mirror at the time of this notice. perl: The Perl package is now at version 5.8.8. Perl 5.8.8 will continue to load modules which were built for Perl 5.8.7. Perl has also changed to use berkeleydb 4.3 as the DB_File backend. This was a necessary change to allow DB_File to be used with mod_perl. Tests indicate that no action should be required when accessing DB_File databases created with the last release of Perl. However, if you do encounter issues loading existing DB_File databases, the usual dump/reload procedure can be used to update the database for use with bdb43. E.g.: $ /opt/csw/bin/db_dump old.db | /opt/csw/bdb43/bin/db_load new.db $ mv new.db old.db apache2: The Apache package is now at version 2.2.0. Existing configuration httpd.conf and ssl.conf files will be updated to 2.2.0 syntax at install time. A supplementary script is provided (apache2/sbin/update20to22) which can be used to upgrade additional configuration files. The changes to syntax are: o mod_auth is now split out into a number of separate modules, all of which will initially be enabled in httpd.conf. o IfModule directives now use 'module_' syntax instead of '.c'. By default, Apache 2.2.0 now splits most configuration sections out into separate files in etc/extra (e.g. etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf). All blastwave ap2 modules will now write initial configuration into this directory, and write a single Include line into httpd.conf. Aside from these changes, there may be some changes specific to certain authentication and authorization modules. The changes are minor, normally limited to directive name changes. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html for complete details. php5: The PHP 5 suite of packages is now at version 5.1.2. This release includes a new php5_wddx package, PDO support, as well as support for net-snmp 5.3 in php5_snmp. A small utility 'php5/bin/phpext' is now included which can be used to query, enable, and disable php5 extensions in php.ini. This is used by extension package pre/postinstall/remove scripts, and can be used by other packages to query whether certain modules are installed. For example: -bash# /opt/csw/php5/bin/phpext -q mbstring wddx mbstring_enabled=true wddx_enabled=false -bash# subversion: Subversion is now updated to version 1.3.0. This release uses BerkeleyDB 4.3.29 for bdb repositories. For users updating from the latest 1.2.3 release, which used BerkeleyDB 4.3.27, there are no actions required. Users upgrading from prior releases should read the upgrade notes found on the mantis news page for subversion. Note that since subversion 1.2.0, the default repository type has been fsfs, so most users will not need to worry about bdb repositories in the first place. ruby: Ruby is now updated to version 1.8.4. This release now allows full support of Rails on Blastwave. samp: SAMP, Solaris/Apache/MySQL/Perl-Python-PHP5, is a bundle package which installs everything required for a Solaris based application server. Language integration is via Apache 2.2.0 modules, mod_perl 2.0.2, mod_python 3.1.4, and php 5.1.2. MySQL 4.1 is the database backend, and SQLite 3 is included for lightweight database integration. Other notable new packages: rapidsvn 0.9.0 - Subversion GUI built on wxWidgets svk 1.06 - Distributed version control with Subversion trac 0.9.3 - Integrated SCM and project management interface clearsilver - Language neutral templating pysqlite2 - Python support for SQLite 3.x libapreq2/ap2_modapreq2 2.06 - Apache Request library berkeleydb44 4.4.20 - BerkeleyDB 4.4.20 -- Cory Omand From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 00:11:54 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:11:54 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA7330.9060703@umuc.edu> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> <43EA7330.9060703@umuc.edu> Message-ID: <43EA7ABA.5030400@blastwave.org> Peter Friedman wrote: > Cory Omand wrote: >> The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try >> updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. > > I just want to confirm, in case I'm missing something. When you say "try > updating your local catalog", do you mean pkg-get -U or something else? I mean 'pkg-get -U', however, I just checked ibiblio, which is apparently up to date, and it still shows that the extension modules and php5 core are 5.0.5, but ap2_modphp5 is 5.1.2. I have notified the release manager, so hopefully this will be cleared up soon. Sorry for the inconvenience, Cory. -- Cory Omand From ger at accepte.nl Thu Feb 9 14:15:00 2006 From: ger at accepte.nl (ger at accepte.nl) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:15:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc Message-ID: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> Hey Group, While trying to get php 5.0.5 to run, I encountered the following problem: [Thu Feb 09 13:06:28 2006] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart PHP Warning: PHP Startup: \xfd\xe2X`\xfd\xdf\x9b\xe4: Unable to initialize module\nModule compiled with module API=20041030, debug=1, thread-safety=0\nPHP compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0, thread-safety=0\nThese options need to match\n in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/debug-non-zts-20041030/dom.so' - ld.so.1: /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/debug-non-zts-20041030/dom.so: symbol _zval_ptr_dtor_wrapper: referenced symbol not found in Unknown on line 0 (snipped some output) It appears the php5 extensions were compiled for a different version? I already checked to see if it could be something I've done wrong but a complete reinstall of the php5 package did not help. Is it possible that the package (php5 unstable) has been shipped with binary incompatible extensions? The following extensions appear to be incompatible: dom.so exif.so iconv.so mbstring.so soap.so sockets.so What can I do to get these extensions to load? Apache2 and PHP5 both work as expected in all other respects. The server is Solaris 9 sparc. TIA, Ger Schinkel From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Feb 9 15:39:07 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:39:07 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ANNOUNCE: XEmacs 21.4.19 in testing Message-ID: <43EB540B.8010509@cognigencorp.com> Hello All, XEmacs 21.4.19 is available for testing, the i386 and sparc packages can be downloaded from http://www.blastwave.org/testing/. XEmacs has been built with the Athena widget set, MULE (multi-lingual Emacs) support and includes the efs-1.33, xemacs-base-2.01, and mule-base-1.47 add-on packages. This XEmacs build does NOT include Motif support. This is do to a bug i discovery where XEmacs locks up and crashes when Adobe Acrobat 7.x+ is running. I will no longer be including Motif support in the XEmacs builds, sorry. A complete description of build is included below. Enjoy. Installation description (M-x describe-installation) uname -a: SunOS ra 5.8 Generic_117350-28 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 ./configure '--prefix=/opt/csw/xemacs' '--site-prefixes=/opt/csw' '--with-sound=native,nonas,noesd' '--with-ldap=no' '--with-postgresql=no' '--with-database=dbm' '--with-ncurses' '--with-widgets=athena' '--with-dialogs=athena' '--with-mule' '--with-xfs' '--without-xim' XEmacs 21.4.19 "Constant Variable" configured for `sparc-sun-solaris2.8'. Compilation / Installation: Source code location: /export/medusa/darin/build/xemacs-21.4.19 Installation prefix: /opt/csw/xemacs Additional prefixes: /opt/csw Runtime library search path: /opt/csw/lib Operating system description file: `s/sol2.h' Machine description file: `m/sparc.h' Compiler: cc -v -xO4 Compiler version: cc: Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07 Relocating allocator for buffers: yes GNU version of malloc: yes libc: SUNWcsl 11.8.0,REV=2000.01.08.18.12 Window System: Compiling in support for the X window system: - X Windows headers location: - X Windows libraries location: - Xau (X authority) not available. - Handling WM_COMMAND properly. Compiling in support for the Athena widget set: - Athena headers location: X11/Xaw - Athena library to link: Xaw Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena dialog boxes. Using Athena native widgets. TTY: Compiling in support for ncurses. Images: Compiling in support for GIF images (builtin). Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for PNG images. Compiling in support for JPEG images. Compiling in support for TIFF images. Sound: Compiling in support for sound (native). Databases: Compiling in support for DBM. Internationalization: Compiling in support for Mule (multi-lingual Emacs). - Using XFontSet to provide bilingual menubar. Mail: Compiling in support for "dot-locking" mail spool file locking method. Other Features: Inhibiting IPv6 canonicalization at startup. Compiling in support for dynamic shared object modules. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 18:37:56 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:37:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc In-Reply-To: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> References: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> Message-ID: <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> ger at accepte.nl wrote: > What can I do to get these extensions to load? Apache2 and PHP5 both work as > expected in all other respects. Please check your apache2 and php5 versions. Apache2 2.2.0 requires the php5 5.1.2 package set (ap2 module + extensions), while Apache2 2.0.55 requires the php5 5.0.5 package set. The former is the 'unstable' release, and the latter is the 'stable' package set. There was a bit of lag in the catalog, due to the number of packages in this release, so you might try updating your catalog and checking that you have the most recent version of all apache2 and php5 related packages. HTH, Cory. -- Cory Omand From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Feb 9 21:04:38 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:04:38 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...] Message-ID: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> this came into the kde-solaris list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:18:16 -0500 From: Reply-To: For people using KDE on Solaris, with questions about KDE or Solaris To: *Hello,* ** *I hate to be a 'Chicken Little', but I ran pkg-get upgrade on my Solaris 10 SunBlade 100 and now I can't log into KDE. I had been running KDE 3.4.2 (REV=2005.9.18) with no problems for a while now and during the upgrade, I noticed that only kde_base was getting upgraded to 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08), while the rest of KDE was not. I didn't think anything of it at the time, but after rebooting, I can't log in to KDE. The OpenWindows desktop starts to load, I see the KDM loading screen, then a KDE error message pops up showing the 'bomb and gear' icon, but there is no text in the error message, and then everything just freezes. I have to power off the box and choose a different desktop session to actually log in.* ** *Is there a way to roll back the kde_base package to the previous version? If not, does anyone have an idea as to how I can begin diagnosing this problem, seeing as I can't even log in to KDE?* ** *Many thanks in advance,* ** ** *Evan D. Bradley* This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: file:///tmp/nsmail.txt Url: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060209/e9de0846/attachment.txt From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 21:27:18 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:27:18 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] CSWsvn and libuuid on Solaris 8 Message-ID: <43EBA5A6.8030406@blastwave.org> Some users have been reporting that, when trying to invoke the 'svn' they see the following: $ svn --version ld.so.1: svn: fatal: libuuid.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed If you see this, please apply patch 115831-01 (SPARC), or 115832-01 (x86) to your affected systems. - C. -- Cory Omand From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Feb 9 21:35:51 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:35:51 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] New netsnmp-5.3.0.1 package Message-ID: <20060209203551.GA18347@colnet> I'm having problems after installing the new netsnmp package. Whereas with the original package, I have some scripts that reliably queried my router using snmpwalk to extract and print information like the WAN IP address assigned to it, with the new package I get a lot of errors when I invoke snmpwalk, and no information: $ snmpwalk -c public 192.168.123.123 >/dev/null Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UDP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (HOST-RESOURCES-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-SMI): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (DISMAN-EVENT-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (DISMAN-SCHEDULE-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-SNMP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DEMO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-TARGET-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DISKIO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (LM-SENSORS-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (MTA-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DLMOD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-MPD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-TM): At line 0 in (none) Now, SNMP is not one of my strengths. Can someone determine if this is a package problem or perhaps a change in the command itself or the need for me to supply ancillary information elsewhere that I need to take into consideration? Help! Thanks, Rob From ger at accepte.nl Fri Feb 10 12:23:14 2006 From: ger at accepte.nl (ger at accepte.nl) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:23:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc In-Reply-To: <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> References: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <200602101223.14739.ger@accepte.nl> On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:37, Cory Omand wrote: > Please check your apache2 and php5 versions. Apache2 2.2.0 requires the > php5 5.1.2 package set (ap2 module + extensions), while Apache2 2.0.55 > requires the php5 5.0.5 package set. The former is the 'unstable' > release, and the latter is the 'stable' package set. There was a bit of > lag in the catalog, due to the number of packages in this release, so > you might try updating your catalog and checking that you have the most > recent version of all apache2 and php5 related packages. bash-2.05# ./apachectl -v Server version: Apache/2.2.0 Server built: Jan 30 2006 21:12:16 PHP version is 5.1.2 Weird thing is that when I click on 'view files in package' on the website for PHP5, it says that the extensions dir should be no-debug-non-zts-20050922, while it is debug-non-zts-20041030 for me. I double checked by removing the package altogether, but the PHP5.1.2 really contains that directory. Could this break things? Or should I try a different mirror? On a sidenote: I first went for the stable tree, but there was no ap2_modphp5 package on any mirror for download, so that didn't work out. (solaris 9, sparc) TIA, Ger Schinkel From blastwave at tomseeley.co.uk Fri Feb 10 15:37:19 2006 From: blastwave at tomseeley.co.uk (tom @ blastwave) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:37:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...] In-Reply-To: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> References: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <43ECA51F.9040200@tomseeley.co.uk> Darin Perusich wrote: > *I hate to be a 'Chicken Little', but I ran pkg-get upgrade on my > Solaris 10 SunBlade 100 and now I can't log into KDE. I had been > running KDE 3.4.2 (REV=2005.9.18) with no problems for a while now and > during the upgrade, I noticed that only kde_base was getting upgraded to > 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08), while the rest of KDE was not. I didn't think > anything of it at the time, but after rebooting, I can't log in to KDE. > The OpenWindows desktop starts to load, I see the KDM loading screen, > then a KDE error message pops up showing the 'bomb and gear' icon, but > there is no text in the error message, and then everything just > freezes. I have to power off the box and choose a different desktop > session to actually log in.* I experienced exactly the same behavior after installing kde_gcc on a fresh solaris 9 (sparc) install. On reading the above I downgraded kdebase_gcc to 3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20. This solved the lack of text problem, but not the crashing. On login kded and kcminit crash, kded does so repeatedly, gdb tries to get a backtrace but apparently there aren't any symbols available. Tom. From EBradley at williams-int.com Fri Feb 10 17:38:57 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:38:57 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...] Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40134FBF8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Actually, I sent the original message to the solaris-KDE list, and Darin forwarded it here on my behalf. Tom, how did you downgrade kdebase_gcc? Was it a function of pkg-get itself, or did you just manually install the older version of kdebase_gcc? I'm sorry to hear that it didn't fix the problem, but I'd like to know how to downgrade packages using pkg-get in the future should something like this happen again. Thanks, Evan Tom wrote: >I experienced exactly the same behavior after installing kde_gcc on a >fresh solaris 9 (sparc) install. On reading the above I downgraded >kdebase_gcc to 3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20. This solved the lack of text >problem, but not the crashing. On login kded and kcminit crash, kded >does so repeatedly, gdb tries to get a backtrace but apparently there >aren't any symbols available. > > >Tom. Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From mmayer at blastwave.org Fri Feb 10 17:45:16 2006 From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:45:16 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... In-Reply-To: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> References: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <20060210164516.GA6763@enterprise.blastwave.org> > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:18:16 -0500 > From: > Reply-To: For people using KDE on Solaris, with questions about KDE or > Solaris > To: > > > > *Hello,* > ** > *I hate to be a 'Chicken Little', but I ran pkg-get upgrade on my > Solaris 10 SunBlade 100 and now I can't log into KDE. I had been > running KDE 3.4.2 (REV=2005.9.18) with no problems for a while now and > during the upgrade, I noticed that only kde_base was getting upgraded to > 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08), while the rest of KDE was not. This problem, I am pretty sure, is related to Bug 1455 (http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1455). Somehow all the binaries in kdebase 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08) got linked to both CSWqt and CSWqtgcc. > Is there a way to roll back the kde_base package to the previous > version? Yes, get the latest kdebase version from stable (using your favorite mirror), say: $ wget http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable/sparc/5.8/kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz then remove the existing CSWkdebasegcc package and install the one from stable you just downloaded. Hope that helps. Regards, Markus From james at blastwave.org Fri Feb 10 18:42:22 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:42:22 GMT Subject: [csw-users] [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... In-Reply-To: <20060210164516.GA6763@enterprise.blastwave.org> References: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> <20060210164516.GA6763@enterprise.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <20060210.17422200.3624130097@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 10/02/06, 16:45:16, Markus Mayer wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...: > This problem, I am pretty sure, is related to Bug 1455 > (http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1455). > Somehow all the binaries in kdebase 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08) got linked > to both CSWqt and CSWqtgcc. On its own this shouldn't be enough to cause problems. It is allowable to have both QTs installed for other reasons. The problem is the RPATH: $ dump -Lv /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/konsole | grep RPATH [40] RPATH /opt/csw/lib:/opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib:/opt/csw/gcc3/lib:/usr/openwin/lib It needs /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib first. As a workaround try forcing it first with LD_LIBRARY_PATH. $ ldd /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/konsole | grep qt libqt-mt.so.3 => /opt/csw/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib ldd /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/konsole | grep qt libqt-mt.so.3 => /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 James. From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Feb 10 19:46:41 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:46:41 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] tcpdump 3.9.4 now available in testing Message-ID: <43ECDF91.9090808@acm.org> tcpdump 3.9.4 for sparc & x86 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing dependencies are: P CSWossl From comand at blastwave.org Fri Feb 10 21:28:25 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:28:25 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc In-Reply-To: <200602101223.14739.ger@accepte.nl> References: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> <200602101223.14739.ger@accepte.nl> Message-ID: <43ECF769.2030604@blastwave.org> ger at accepte.nl wrote: > bash-2.05# ./apachectl -v > Server version: Apache/2.2.0 > Server built: Jan 30 2006 21:12:16 > > PHP version is 5.1.2 > > Weird thing is that when I click on 'view files in package' on the website for > PHP5, it says that the extensions dir should be no-debug-non-zts-20050922, > while it is debug-non-zts-20041030 for me. I double checked by removing the > package altogether, but the PHP5.1.2 really contains that directory. Could > this break things? Or should I try a different mirror If possible, please check your packages against a different mirror. The 'debug-non-zts-20041030' directory is from the 5.0.5 version of PHP5, while the no-debug-non-zts-20050922 directory is used by 5.1.2 extensions. Therefore, you could have a mix of 5.0.5 and 5.1.2 packages on your system. HTH, - C. -- Cory Omand From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Sat Feb 11 05:29:02 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:29:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with bad perl / mod_perl interaction Message-ID: <20060211042901.GA28419@stampfli> I just upgraded CSWperl (to 5.8.8) but found that my Apache web server would not come up after doing so. The problem is that CSWmodperl is still expecting the old perl (5.8.7) and cannot find things in the new hierarchy. If you don't use mod_perl, this upgrade will not be a problem for you. However, if you do encounter this problem, here is a quick and dirty work-around that seems to work for me: ln -s 5.8.8 /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.7 Rob From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Feb 11 05:41:50 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:41:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] nagios - nagiosp - nrpe update Message-ID: <20060210224150.000075f3@sws602.mcsun.local> With a recent update to the nagiosp package, nrpe is now a separate package. However, the check_nrpe plugin is still distributed with the nagios server package. After you update nagiosp to version 1.4.2,REV=2006.02.09, and if you use nrpe, please install nrpe with pkg-get. Also included with the nrpe package are files and instructions for adding nrpe to SMF on Solaris 10 and later. This is only useful if you run nrpe as a daemon. So, if you want to use SMF, you need to do the few steps of installation manually, as outlined in README-SMF.CSW. nagios is updated to version 2.0. The most recent package version is 2.0,REV=2006.02.09. This is a big (and good) update and you may have to change your configuration files. See the 'what's new' section of the html documentation for a list of the changes. I think that I also changed my email notification macros to use $SHORTDATETIME$ instead of $DATETIME$. But I am not sure of when I did this; since I have been running beta versions of 2.0 for a few months now. The older nrpe package version 1.3 is not compatible with nagios 2.0, so remember to install nrpe if you need it. Alex -- From a.cervellin at acm.org Sat Feb 11 21:46:27 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:46:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Seamonkey 1.0 available for testing Message-ID: <43EE4D23.3070204@acm.org> Seamonkey 1.0 (aka mozilla suite 1.8.0.1) is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing for Sparc and x86. Dependencies are: P CSWbonobo2 P CSWfconfig P CSWftype2 P CSWgconf2 P CSWggettext P CSWglib2 P CSWgnomekeyring P CSWgnomevfs2 P CSWgtk2 P CSWiconv P CSWlibart P CSWlibatk P CSWlibbonoboui P CSWlibcairo P CSWlibgnome P CSWlibgnomecanvas P CSWlibgnomeui P CSWlibidl P CSWlibnet P CSWlibpopt P CSWlibxft2 P CSWlibxml2 P CSWlibxrender P CSWorbit2 P CSWpango P CSWzlib From comand at blastwave.org Sat Feb 11 22:30:30 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:30:30 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Perl 5.8.8 and CSWmodperl Message-ID: <43EE5776.8070606@blastwave.org> NOTICE: If you make use of Apache 1.3.x and CSWmodperl, and have recently upgraded to the latest version of Perl in unstable, please read the following notice. If you are using Apache 2.x and CSWap2modperl, you can safely ignore this message. It was recently reported that Apache 1.3.x and CSWmodperl are impacted by the new perl 5.8.8 package released to unstable. When restarting the apache server after updating perl, server startup will report the following error: bash$ /etc/init.d/cswapache start [Sat Feb 11 13:25:52 2006] [error] Can't locate strict.pm in @INC [...] This is due to the fact that mod_perl 1.x appears to embed a static @INC path from the version of perl that it was compiled with. It will not get a new @INC path from perl, as mod_perl 2.x will. Until a new version of mod_perl 1.x is released, it is recommended that you *not* update your perl package, if possible. If you have already updated, or require perl 5.8.8 for some other reason, there is a simple workaround for apache and mod_perl. Add the following lines to the top of your /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl: PERL5LIB=/opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8:/opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8 export PERL5LIB This will allow your server to start up and locate the core perl modules. Sorry for any inconvenience, - C. -- Cory Omand From nico at sonycom.com Mon Feb 13 15:57:58 2006 From: nico at sonycom.com (Nico De Ranter) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:57:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl Message-ID: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Hi, I'm trying to compile a bunch of modules for Perl (stable/5.8 repository). Unfortunately I can't compile modules that contain C code as these have to be compiled with exactly the same compiler as the one perl was compiled with. So: anybody any idea which compiler was used to compiler perl (not gcc apparently)? Nico -- --------------------------------------------------------- "It has been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." --------------------------------------------------------- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium Telephone: +32 (0)2 700 86 41 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 86 22 From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 13 16:13:36 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:13:36 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> References: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: <20060213091336.000002db@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:57:58 +0100 Nico De Ranter wrote: > I'm trying to compile a bunch of modules for Perl (stable/5.8 > repository). Unfortunately I can't compile modules that contain C code > as these have to be compiled with exactly the same compiler as the one > perl was compiled with. So: anybody any idea which compiler was used > to compiler perl (not gcc apparently)? Correct, not gcc, at least on the modules that I am aware of. Sun's Studio 8 is typically used. There may be some built with Studio 10, but I am not sure. You may be able to use Sun's Studio 11, which I think is now available for no charge. Previous to Studio 11, Sun's compilers did cost a bit of money. Always use LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST:/opt/csw/lib'. I also use CFLAGS='O -xarch=[v8 or 386]' and put /opt/csw/bin in PATH before any other directories that have the perl binary. Since the blastwave modules are build with INSTALLDIRS=vendor, the following is revised for what you probably want. perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/opt/csw INSTALLDIRS=site gmake gmake test (optional) MAKE=gmake stagepkg (if you want to make a package) Alex -- From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Feb 13 16:19:14 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: On 13/2/06 2:57, Nico De Ranter wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile a bunch of modules for Perl (stable/5.8 > repository). Unfortunately I can't compile modules that contain C code > as these have to be compiled with exactly the same compiler as the one > perl was compiled with. So: anybody any idea which compiler was used to > compiler perl (not gcc apparently)? % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V [...] ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; [...] I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. Cheers, Chris From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 13 16:33:00 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:33:00 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: References: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: <20060213093300.000002e1@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 Chris Ridd wrote: > % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V > [...] > ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; > [...] > > I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part > of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary objects. Alex From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Feb 13 16:58:07 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:58:07 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <20060213093300.000002e1@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: On 13/2/06 3:33, Alex Moore wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V >> [...] >> ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; >> [...] >> >> I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part >> of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. > > I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio > 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. I'd be surprised if Studio 11-built shared objects weren't compatible (though the reverse might not be.) > Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use > with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary > objects. Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were used to build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" and to use them directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl module is nowadays) do all this stuff for you automagically anyway? Cheers, Chris From nico at sonycom.com Mon Feb 13 17:07:46 2006 From: nico at sonycom.com (Nico De Ranter) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:07:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1139846866.17388.102.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Thanks, I'll give it a try. Nico On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 15:58 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 13/2/06 3:33, Alex Moore wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 > > Chris Ridd wrote: > > > >> % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V > >> [...] > >> ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; > >> [...] > >> > >> I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part > >> of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. > > > > I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio > > 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. > > I'd be surprised if Studio 11-built shared objects weren't compatible > (though the reverse might not be.) > > > Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use > > with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary > > objects. > > Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were used to > build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" and to use them > directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl module is nowadays) do all > this stuff for you automagically anyway? > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- --------------------------------------------------------- "It has been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." --------------------------------------------------------- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium Telephone: +32 (0)2 700 86 41 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 86 22 From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 13 17:27:45 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:27:45 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: References: <20060213093300.000002e1@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <20060213102745.0000277e@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:58:07 +0000 Chris Ridd wrote: > Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were > used to build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" > and to use them directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl > module is nowadays) do all this stuff for you automagically anyway? Probably so, if the module uses MakeMaker; and that is the norm. There are variations on what gets pulled in. I have a few that use Module::Build. Alex -- From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 13 21:15:58 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:15:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] amsn 0.95 available for testing Message-ID: <43F0E8FE.4090703@acm.org> amsn 0.95 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing this version it's not pure tcl/tk like 0.94, so there are 2 different archs (sparc & x86). Note: when you'll start it, you'll get a warning about a missing trayicon plugin (that's normal, it's only for the linux version) Dependencies: P CSWgcc3corert P CSWgcc3g++rt P CSWtcl P CSWtk P CSWtcltls From nico at sonycom.com Tue Feb 14 16:02:10 2006 From: nico at sonycom.com (Nico De Ranter) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:02:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <1139846866.17388.102.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> References: <1139846866.17388.102.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: <1139929330.17388.152.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Yep, after installing Studio 11 and adding it to my path I can run /opt/csw/bin/perl -MCPAN -e 'install ...' and everything compiles and installs automaticaly. Thanks! Nico On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 17:07 +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote: > Thanks, I'll give it a try. > > Nico > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 15:58 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > > On 13/2/06 3:33, Alex Moore wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 > > > Chris Ridd wrote: > > > > > >> % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V > > >> [...] > > >> ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; > > >> [...] > > >> > > >> I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part > > >> of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. > > > > > > I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio > > > 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. > > > > I'd be surprised if Studio 11-built shared objects weren't compatible > > (though the reverse might not be.) > > > > > Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use > > > with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary > > > objects. > > > > Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were used to > > build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" and to use them > > directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl module is nowadays) do all > > this stuff for you automagically anyway? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- --------------------------------------------------------- "It has been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." --------------------------------------------------------- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium Telephone: +32 (0)2 700 86 41 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 86 22 From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Wed Feb 15 21:53:24 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:53:24 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd Message-ID: I just realized that pureftpd is a CSW package while I've been trying to get it to compile with the TLS options. Is there someway for me to find out what options were enabled in the pureftpd package ? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060215/5ebe386f/attachment.html From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 15 22:04:51 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:04:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43F39773.4080707@acm.org> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I just realized that pureftpd is a CSW package while I've been trying to > get it to compile with the TLS options. Is there someway for me to find > out what options were enabled in the pureftpd package ? --prefix=/opt/csw --with-openssl=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-tls --with-largefile --with-everything --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 15 22:27:13 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:27:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] balance 3.32 now available Message-ID: <43F39CB1.1050402@acm.org> Balance 3.32 (a new pkg for blastwave) is now ready for testing on http://www.blaswave.org/testing No dependencies needed. What is Balance? Balance is a surprisingly successful load balancing solution being a simple but powerful generic tcp proxy with round robin load balancing and failover mechanisms. Its behaviour can be controlled at runtime using a simple command line syntax. More info at: http://www.inlab.de/balance.html From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Wed Feb 15 22:45:49 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:45:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd Message-ID: Excellent, thank you very much. The README file in the pureftpd source says that --with-everything includes external authentication. Does that mean that --with-everything includes the features of --with-MySQL ? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alessio Cervellin Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 4:05 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I just realized that pureftpd is a CSW package while I've been trying > to get it to compile with the TLS options. Is there someway for me to > find out what options were enabled in the pureftpd package ? --prefix=/opt/csw --with-openssl=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-tls --with-largefile --with-everything --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 15 22:50:17 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:50:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43F3A219.3020101@acm.org> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > Excellent, thank you very much. The README file in the pureftpd source > says that --with-everything includes external authentication. Does that > mean that --with-everything includes the features of --with-MySQL ? i'm sorry but i've no idea, i don't know the package pureftpd (and the maintainer of it left the blastwave community times ago...) From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 02:02:24 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:02:24 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] openldap alert! Message-ID: <20060215190224.00005dad@sws602.mcsun.local> See http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001478 for details Alex -- From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 02:51:39 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:39 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] openldap alert followup Message-ID: <20060215195139.0000366d@sws602.mcsun.local> New packages are in http://www.blastwave.org/testing for openldap openldap_client openldap_rt They will be at the mirrors within the next few days, if not sooner. These packages are compatible with the current perl and berkeleydb43 packages. If it matters to anyone, I had to add --enable-perl=no to openldap's configure. Alex -- From strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu Thu Feb 16 03:27:46 2006 From: strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu (Dan Stromberg) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:27:46 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] MySQL 5, PHP 5, Apache 2 Message-ID: <1140056867.24382.185.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> Hi folks. I'm trying to get MySQL 5, PHP 5 and Apache 2 onto a Solaris 9/sparc system, and working in tandem. However, although I've used blastwave to install MySQL 5, PHP 5 and Apache 2 on the system, when I look in phpinfo, phpinfo believes that I'm using MySQL 4. This seems weird. :) Is it possible that what I really have is PHP 5 accessing MySQL 5 via the MySQL 4 client API? And if so, am I missing out on anything? And does blastwave have a true MySQL 5/PHP 5/Apache 2 combination available? Thanks! From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 18:13:56 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] MySQL 5, PHP 5, Apache 2 In-Reply-To: <1140056867.24382.185.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> References: <1140056867.24382.185.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> Message-ID: <43F4B2D4.208@blastwave.org> Dan Stromberg wrote: > Is it possible that what I really have is PHP 5 accessing MySQL 5 via > the MySQL 4 client API? And if so, am I missing out on anything? I did a bit of investigation on php5 and MySQL 5, and found that the mysqli extension (php5_mysqli) does in fact support some of the new MySQL 5 features (specifically, I found a note about cursor support). There should be no problem with linking the php5 MySQL extension to MySQL 5 and then accessing a MySQL 4 server, therefore I will relink the mysql(i) extensions with MySQL 5, and release the packages to testing later this week. Regards, Cory. -- Cory Omand From EBradley at williams-int.com Thu Feb 16 20:47:12 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:47:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Hello, I am using the stable repositories in pkg-get.conf and just tried to install rrdtool by using the following command: pkg-get -if rrdtool The install began well, but ended abruptly. I was alarmed because the error reported that the checksum's and expected size of the files did not match! Here is the exact error: . . . PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS pkgadd: ERROR: packaging file is corrupt file size <67> expected <50> actual file cksum <4244> expected <3155> actual Installation of failed (internal error). No changes were made to the system. ERROR: could not add CSWrrd. [139-eb1850 at sb100-10-/local/Software] . . . Could anyone shed some light on this for me? Thanks, Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From a.cervellin at acm.org Thu Feb 16 20:53:19 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:53:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <43F4D82F.5080901@acm.org> EBradley at williams-int.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am using the stable repositories in pkg-get.conf and just tried to > install rrdtool by using the following command: pkg-get -if rrdtool > The install began well, but ended abruptly. I was alarmed because the > error reported that the checksum's and expected size of the files did > not match! Here is the exact error: did you try to change mirror in pkg-get.conf ? From EBradley at williams-int.com Thu Feb 16 21:01:22 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:01:22 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBC6@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> I almost included this in my original message, but didn't think it really mattered. Yes, I have tried changing the mirror in pkg-get.conf; but only to the secondary mirror that is already listed. Thanks for the quick reply, Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alessio Cervellin Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:53 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool EBradley at williams-int.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am using the stable repositories in pkg-get.conf and just tried to > install rrdtool by using the following command: pkg-get -if rrdtool > The install began well, but ended abruptly. I was alarmed because the > error reported that the checksum's and expected size of the files did > not match! Here is the exact error: did you try to change mirror in pkg-get.conf ? _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From a.cervellin at acm.org Thu Feb 16 21:06:33 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:06:33 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBC6@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBC6@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <43F4DB49.3000705@acm.org> EBradley at williams-int.com wrote: > I almost included this in my original message, but didn't think it > really mattered. Yes, it matters because it could happen that during the synching process of the mirror servers, some packages could be transfered corrupted. The complete list of the mirrors is here: http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/mirrorStatus.jsp I'd try yet another mirror... (even if i don't really know why you are having that error) From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 21:06:22 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:22 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <20060216140622.00003c20@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:47:12 -0500 wrote: > is corrupt > > file size <67> expected <50> actual > > file cksum <4244> expected <3155> actual Sorry, no help here. I have a local repository that I update nightly with rsync and I have exactly the same error in stable. If you would, please enter a bug report. Also, request that SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency. Alex From EBradley at williams-int.com Thu Feb 16 21:24:55 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:24:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBEA@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Okay, I've tried the stable portions of both the default and secondary sites listed in pkg-get.conf, the stable repo on http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw, and also the unstable repo on the default site in pkg-get.conf...all give the same error re: rrdtool's checksum being out of whack. I'll file a bug report against the package. Alex, why should SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency? (I'm not doubting you, I'd just like to have a reason to back up my request.) Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alex Moore Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:06 PM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: Re: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:47:12 -0500 wrote: > is corrupt > > file size <67> expected <50> actual > > file cksum <4244> expected <3155> actual Sorry, no help here. I have a local repository that I update nightly with rsync and I have exactly the same error in stable. If you would, please enter a bug report. Also, request that SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency. Alex _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From james at blastwave.org Fri Feb 17 10:47:30 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:47:30 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBEA@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBEA@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <20060217.9473000.2765521724@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 16/02/06, 20:24:55, wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool: > I'll file a bug report against the package. There is one: http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001432 (This shouldn't have been closed because the fix has not yet filtered through.) > Alex, why should SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency? (I'm not doubting > you, I'd just like to have a reason to back up my request.) It prevents the package being install where SUNWcslx does not exist, which is sun4m and more significantly Solaris 10. $ uname -a SunOS XXXX 5.10 Generic_118822-23 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine $ pkginfo SUNWcslx ERROR: information for "SUNWcslx" was not found $ uname -a SunOS XXXX 5.8 Generic_117350-25 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20 $ pkginfo SUNWcslx ERROR: information for "SUNWcslx" was not found But this machine is will work: $ uname -a SunOS XXXX 5.8 Generic_117350-28 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 $ pkginfo SUNWcslx system SUNWcslx Core Solaris Libraries (64-bit) http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001366 http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001350 James. From chris.ridd at isode.com Tue Feb 21 11:20:16 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:20:16 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Desktop files for GNOME apps Message-ID: Do any X11 (especially GNOME) apps from Blastwave come with .desktop files? AFAIK these are used to automatically populate the Launch menu in JDS. I just installed firefox 1.5.0.1 from the testing directory, and didn't notice one :-( Cheers, Chris From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 22 20:56:26 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:56:26 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Pound 1.10 available in /testing Message-ID: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> Pound 1.10 is now available for testing in http://www.blastwave.org/testing It's the last version of the 1.x tree and contains bug fixes for the 1.9 version, no new features. The configuration file syntax is the same. In the above place you can also find Pound 2.0.2: it has many new features, a different configuration file syntax, but it is still considered "beta quality". Both have been configured with the following switches: --with-ssl=/opt/csw --enable-msdav --enable-super Note: actual blastwave's pound package (1.9) does not have msdav support, these new ones do. From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Wed Feb 22 21:57:34 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:57:34 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla 1.7.5 updates In-Reply-To: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> References: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> Message-ID: <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> Hi there, Has development for Mozilla on Solaris stopped at 1.7.5. I think the latest Windows release was 1.7.12. Was there a reason why - I would hate to be forced into using Thunderchicken and the SmolderingHamster ;) Cheers, S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060222/49b393d1/attachment.html From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 22 22:05:27 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:05:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla 1.7.5 updates In-Reply-To: <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> References: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> Message-ID: <43FCD217.9000601@acm.org> LOEWENTHAL Simon wrote: > > Hi there, > > Has development for Mozilla on Solaris stopped at 1.7.5. I think the > latest Windows release was 1.7.12. Was there a reason why - I would > hate to be forced into using Thunderchicken and the SmolderingHamster ;) no it didn't stop, and 1.7.12 is not the latest one... indeed you can find Seamonkey 1.0 (aka Mozilla 1.8.0.1) on http://www.blastwave.org/testing and it should be soon released in the unstable blastwave tree too. From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Wed Feb 22 22:11:22 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:11:22 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla 1.7.5 updates In-Reply-To: <43FCD217.9000601@acm.org> References: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> <43FCD217.9000601@acm.org> Message-ID: <43FCD37A.4070702@gemini.edu> Great - thanks for the update. Sea Monkey - Love it. Alessio Cervellin wrote: >LOEWENTHAL Simon wrote: > > >>Hi there, >> >>Has development for Mozilla on Solaris stopped at 1.7.5. I think the >>latest Windows release was 1.7.12. Was there a reason why - I would >>hate to be forced into using Thunderchicken and the SmolderingHamster ;) >> >> > >no it didn't stop, and 1.7.12 is not the latest one... indeed you can >find Seamonkey 1.0 (aka Mozilla 1.8.0.1) on >http://www.blastwave.org/testing and it should be soon released in the >unstable blastwave tree too. >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- // Nothing fancy and nothing Microsoft -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060222/0b7c130b/attachment.html From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Feb 23 13:05:02 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:05:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Evince Message-ID: <43FDA4EE.5030802@ericsson.com> I did try to install the Evince pkg from the unstable area but got the following: ... ERROR: no info for CSWpoppler. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWevince /MOL From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Thu Feb 23 13:31:44 2006 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (alessio) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:31:44 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] Evince Message-ID: <26337733.1140697904629.JavaMail.root@pswm18.cp.tin.it> I would say there's a problem with the catalog file. You could manually install the missing poppler package by downloading it here: http: //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/ and then try again pkg- get -i evince ----Original Message---- From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com Date: Feb 23, 2006 1:05 PM To: "questions and discussions" Subj: [csw-users] Evince I did try to install the Evince pkg from the unstable area but got the following: ... ERROR: no info for CSWpoppler. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWevince /MOL _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From james at blastwave.org Thu Feb 23 13:34:47 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:34:47 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Evince In-Reply-To: <43FDA4EE.5030802@ericsson.com> References: <43FDA4EE.5030802@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060223.12344700.2535656561@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 23/02/06, 12:05:02, Mats Larsson wrote regarding [csw-users] Evince: > I did try to install the Evince pkg from the unstable area but got the > following: > ... > ERROR: no info for CSWpoppler. Cannot install dependancy. > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWevince Yes, that is so. It's a brand new release and the corresponding CSWpoppler package has not yet been released. Please just ignore CSWevince now. If you want to can get poppler from www.blastwave.org/testing/ but with all things testing you are on your own - I heard there was good reason not to release it but I don't know what. This will be fixed but maybe in the short term by just removing CSWevince from the archive. Sorry any inconvenience. James. From chris.ridd at isode.com Thu Feb 23 19:14:28 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:14:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Desktop files for GNOME apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 21/2/06 10:20, Chris Ridd wrote: > Do any X11 (especially GNOME) apps from Blastwave come with .desktop files? > AFAIK these are used to automatically populate the Launch menu in JDS. > > I just installed firefox 1.5.0.1 from the testing directory, and didn't > notice one :-( Nobody? OK, I added a bug to request this. Cheers, Chris From aw-confirm at ebay.com Fri Feb 24 16:19:20 2006 From: aw-confirm at ebay.com (aw-confirm at ebay.com) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:49:20 +0530 Subject: [csw-users] Question from eBay Member Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060224/074023f3/attachment.html From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Feb 24 23:13:57 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] scotty 3.0.0 now available in testing Message-ID: <43FF8525.1020301@acm.org> A new pkg is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing : scotty-3.0.0,REV=2006.02.24-SunOS5.8-* The package contains both "Tnm" and "Tkined". "Scotty is the name of a software package which allows to implement site specific network management software using high-level, string-based APIs. The software is based on the Tool Command Language which simplifies the development of portable network management scripts. The scotty source distribution includes two major components. The first one is the Tnm Tcl Extension which provides access to network management information sources. The second component is the Tkined network editor which provides a framework for an extensible network management system." http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/scotty/ Dependencies are: CSWtcl CSWtk From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Feb 24 23:34:17 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:34:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] xterm 209 available in testing Message-ID: <43FF89E9.5000505@acm.org> xterm 209 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing Dependencies: P CSWfconfig P CSWftype2 P CSWlibxft2 P CSWlibxrender P CSWzlib Changelog: Patch #209 - 2006/2/12 - XFree86 4.5.99.22 * remove setf and setb from xterm-256color terminfo entry to avoid issues with applications that ignore the ANSI strings (report by Emanuele Giaquinta). * remove obsolete references to "Xorg" to avoid confusion with "X.org" (prompted by David Dawes commit message for XFree86). * improve initial layout performance for the toolbar configuration by precalculating the height of the toolbar. * remove menu entry for "Enable Curses Emulation" (to make room for "Select To Clipboard). * add resource selectToClipboard, action set-select and a menu entry to allow users to switch between PRIMARY and CLIPBOARD for select/paste. * allow cursor to have the same color as foreground (text), since it is rendered as reverse (Debian #350664). * amend change for loading utf8Fonts resource from patch #204 to allow an ISO-8859-1 "normal" font to be combined with an ISO-10646 font if the latter is given via the -fw option or its corresponding resource value. * add TIOCSCTTY ioctl() ifdef'd for __GNU__ to set the controlling terminal (Debian #348457). * add configure option --disable-leaks. * add a check in Bell to ensure that the VT100 widget is realized, since it may be called by xtermLoadFont given an incorrect font resource (Redhat #180450). * improve initialization of wide-bold font by not using the derived value when it happens to have few glyphs (report by Mboso Sampson). * improve dynamic colors by not repainting the screen if only the cursor color changes (request by Bram Moolenaar). * fix menu initialization for tek4014 window broken in patch #206. * typo in manpage (Debian #351425). * correct loop logic in dotext to prevent an infinite loop if a wide character was just at the right margin when wrapping was disabled (report by Serge van den Boom). * initialize the saved-cursor data so a restore-cursor operation without a preceding save-cursor operation will not modify the foreground color. * add a new selection feature: regular expressions, and new resources which specify what happens on multiple mouse clicks: on2Clicks, on3Clicks, on4Clicks and on5Clicks. * revert the XTerm.ad change from patch #208 (Debian #348384). * fixes for the print-window to make it handle combining characters in UTF-8 mode. * add check to ensure that double-clicking to extend selection will not extend it into the scrollback area. This still allows users to scroll back and select text (Debian #347415). * add configure option --with-tty-group to help work around deficiencies in packager's build environment (Debian #349142). * fix typo in configure script option --disable-narrowproto (report by David Mart?nez Moreno). * amend CF_X_FREETYPE changes for pkg-config check to ensure that Xft is known to that tool (report and patch by Emanuele Giaquinta). * add an ifdef to allow ./configure --disable-active-icon to work, broken by new code for testing memory leaks in patch #208 (report by Brian Lindholm). Patch #208 - 2006/1/3 - XFree86 4.5.99.19 * add charClass resource to XTerm.ad and UXTerm.ad which simplifies selecting URLs (prompted by Kirill Ponomarew). * modify install rule for uxterm to account for the --program-prefix, etc., options by invoking the transformed name of xterm rather than simply "xterm". * modify configure --with-app-defaults option to allow --without-app-defaults. * add configure --with-symlink option to make it simpler to install successive versions of xterm renamed using the --program-prefix, etc., options with a symbolic link pointing to the most recent. * make -iconic option work with toolbar configuration (GenToo #113604). * suppress lastlog feature for 64-bit Solaris configuration since that platform provides only a 32-bit interface (report by Peter Bray). * fix memory reallocation for the "UTF-8" menu entry when xterm is started using the +u8 option (reported by Jan Willem Stumpel). * add a configure check for the actual path of luit, to work around broken imake configurations. * add a configure check for pkg-config (Redhat Bugzilla #173541). * modify install-rule for uxterm to omit executable suffix, e.g., for Cygwin. * modify sinstall.sh to work around quirks in Cygwin configuration. From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Feb 26 00:21:28 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:21:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] stunnel 4.14 now availabe in testing Message-ID: <4400E678.3020105@acm.org> stunnel 4.14 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing warning: this pkg is actually totally untested (i miss a solaris machine...) "Stunnel is a program that allows you to encrypt arbitrary TCP connections inside SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) available on both Unix and Windows. Stunnel can allow you to secure non-SSL aware daemons and protocols (like POP, IMAP, LDAP, etc) by having Stunnel provide the encryption, requiring no changes to the daemon's code." http://www.stunnel.org/ Dependencies: P CSWossl P CSWzlib From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Feb 26 00:24:30 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:24:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ipaudit 1.0 now available in testing Message-ID: <4400E72E.8000500@acm.org> ipaudit 1.0 beta2 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing warning: this pkg is actually totally untested (i miss a solaris machine...) "IPAudit monitors network activity on a network by host, protocol and port. IPAudit listens to a network device in promiscuous mode, and records every connection between two ip addresses. A unique connection is determined by the ip addresses of the two machines, the protocol used between them, and the port numbers (if they are communicating via udp or tcp)." http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net/ Dependencies: P CSWlibpcap From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 14:36:00 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:36:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get Message-ID: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> Hello. I ordered our sysadmins to install pkg-get on four of our systems, and we ran into an odd problem. On three of our four (supposedly identical) systems pkg-get does not find its config file when started as root, but does find it when started as a non root user. What happens when root runs pkg-get -U is that it complains that there is no config file present. (even though on is). pkg-get then creates a (default) config file in /etc. Looking at the script it seems to do this by catting a "here" document. This default config does not work, as anonymous ftp is aparently not possible to the mirror that is configured in it. The only way we managed to make it work was by copying our config file in /opt/csw/etc to /etc. What I found out after a few tests is that on these three systems pkg-get symple doesn't "see" the config file in /opt/csw/etc when started as root, but that it does see this file when started as a non root user. This strikes me as quite odd... What could the reason be? Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 15:29:53 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:29:53 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > Hello. > Perhaps try to find the offending files first. I don't know how large these systems are but perhaps you can run a find /etc -type f -name pkg-get.conf and find /opt -type f -name pkg-get.conf Then remove every file you find. Then create a file /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf with the following contents : url=http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable # To disable use of gpg or md5, uncomment these #use_gpg=false #use_md5=false Then cd /var/pkg-get rm cat* des* Then try the following .. just to test connection : /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -s http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable -a Let's see what you get from that. It sounds like you have a pkg-get.conf file sitting somewhere on these identical systems. Somewhere other than /opt/csw/etc Dennis From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 15:59:03 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:59:03 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Perhaps try to find the offending files first. > > I don't know how large these systems are but perhaps you can run a > > find /etc -type f -name pkg-get.conf > > and > > find /opt -type f -name pkg-get.conf > > > Then remove every file you find. > > Then create a file /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf with the following contents : > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. The problem is that this file was completely ignored. pkg-get upon first execution complained that _no_ config file was present, and went on to create its own in /etc. The thing that has us scratching our heads is that this only happens when _root_ executes pkg-get. When you execute pkg-get as a normal user it does seem to find the config file we created, as witnessed by the fact that it contacts the mirror we configured. But then ofcourse the installation of the packages downloaded fails... I did a further test where I copied /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf to etc, and changed the mirror in it. I then dit a pkg-get -U, both as root, and as a normal user. By looking at which mirrors were contacted I could see which config file was read. I saw that when pkg-get is executed as root it reads the config file in /etc, and when executed as a normal user it read the config file from /opt/csw/etc. The second thing that has us scratching our head is that this only happens on three of four (asumed) identical systems. All with solaris 8 Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From chris.ridd at isode.com Tue Feb 28 16:04:38 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:04:38 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >> >> Perhaps try to find the offending files first. >> >> I don't know how large these systems are but perhaps you can run a >> >> find /etc -type f -name pkg-get.conf >> >> and >> >> find /opt -type f -name pkg-get.conf >> >> >> Then remove every file you find. >> >> Then create a file /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf with the following contents : >> > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. > > The problem is that this file was completely ignored. pkg-get upon > first execution complained that _no_ config file was present, and went > on to create its own in /etc. > > The thing that has us scratching our heads is that this only happens > when _root_ executes pkg-get. When you execute pkg-get as a normal > user it does seem to find the config file we created, as witnessed by > the fact that it contacts the mirror we configured. But then ofcourse > the installation of the packages downloaded fails... This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on what's actually happening? Cheers, Chris From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 16:10:37 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:10:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. I'll assume /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf which you did not need to create .. because it gets created for you when you install CSWpkg_get let's go back through this step by step and fix this situation okay ? First .. run the fol : pkginfo | grep CSW and then show me what you get > > This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on > what's actually happening? forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time Dennis From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 16:32:50 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:32:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6ed6382b0602280732p39eff737vb6fc2d1537bc35e5@mail.gmail.com> On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > > On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > > > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. > > I'll assume /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf > > which you did not need to create .. because it gets created for you > when you install CSWpkg_get > > let's go back through this step by step and fix this situation okay ? > > First .. run the fol : > > pkginfo | grep CSW > > and then show me what you get Can't do that anymore as a) our sysadmins have gone home and I don't have root on production systems and b) it would give us a whole list of installed CSW packages, as we went on to install quite a bit after copying the config to etc. What we told the sysadmins to do was literally the following: 1) pkgadd -d pkg_get.pkg 2) vi /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf (to change the mirror url to url=http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/csw/stable) 3) /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U This worked fine on the first server, but on the other three pkg-get -U first complained about a missing config file... The file was most definitely not missing. All I can do now is post-mortems. I can not go back an do it all over again. I am just left with the mistery... Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From chris.ridd at isode.com Tue Feb 28 16:42:45 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:42:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 28/2/06 3:10, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: >> This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on >> what's actually happening? > > forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time OK :-) Cheers, Chris From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 16:50:47 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:50:47 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0602280732p39eff737vb6fc2d1537bc35e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> <6ed6382b0602280732p39eff737vb6fc2d1537bc35e5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > > > On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > > > > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > > > > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. > > > > I'll assume /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf > > > > which you did not need to create .. because it gets created for you > > when you install CSWpkg_get > > > > let's go back through this step by step and fix this situation okay ? > > > > First .. run the fol : > > > > pkginfo | grep CSW > > > > and then show me what you get > > Can't do that anymore as a) our sysadmins have gone home and I don't > have root on production systems and b) it would give us a whole list > of installed CSW packages, as we went on to install quite a bit after > copying the config to etc. > > What we told the sysadmins to do was literally the following: > > 1) pkgadd -d pkg_get.pkg > 2) vi /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf > (to change the mirror url to url=http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/csw/stable) > 3) /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U > > This worked fine on the first server, but on the other three pkg-get > -U first complained about a missing config file... The file was most > definitely not missing. > > All I can do now is post-mortems. I can not go back an do it all over > again. I am just left with the mistery... > The pkg-get tool is amazingly simple. Perhaps I need to rewrite the HOWTO again at www.blastwave.org/howto.html Dennis From vaillant at ganil.fr Tue Feb 28 18:31:15 2006 From: vaillant at ganil.fr (Vaillant Daniel) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:31:15 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] y y y y y "toot much" yes or ??? Message-ID: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> hhello, when I do pkg-get upgrade, I have to acquit changes by "recurrent" yes I hoped that with the newly re-found egalization on fullauto-admin to admin in /var/pkg-get this would be a souvenir. Except errors on my side: the answer is NO. How do you do an upgrade with no check, with the option: change all whatever Thank you. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- sy VAILLANT Daniel mailto:vaillant at ganil.fr re GANIL GIP (Syst&Res) Vox:(+33)(0)2 31 45 46 84 mi B.P. 5027 Fax:(+33)(0)2 31 45 46 65 @ 14076 CAEN-Cedex 5 Web: http://www.ganil.fr ........................................................................ Le temps s'?coule, l'espace se dilate, l'?nergie se mat?rialise et tout le reste est commentaire. Miche Cass? Du vide et de la cr?ation From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 19:04:10 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:04:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] y y y y y "toot much" yes or ??? In-Reply-To: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> References: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Vaillant Daniel wrote: > hhello, > > /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get --U -u -f better read the manpage to pkg-get first Dennis From zizban at adelphia.net Wed Feb 1 03:14:27 2006 From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:14:27 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD Message-ID: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 03:16:57 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:16:57 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> Message-ID: On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: > How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a > folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. try pkgadd -d `pwd` see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of packages to install. Dennis From zizban at adelphia.net Wed Feb 1 03:46:18 2006 From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:46:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: >> How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a >> folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. > > try > > pkgadd -d `pwd` > > see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of > packages to install. > I get: pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed - open of failed, errno=2 pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from From zizban at adelphia.net Wed Feb 1 03:46:18 2006 From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:46:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: >> How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a >> folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. > > try > > pkgadd -d `pwd` > > see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of > packages to install. > I get: pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed - open of failed, errno=2 pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from From nlucier at math.purdue.edu Wed Feb 1 04:11:15 2006 From: nlucier at math.purdue.edu (Neal A. Lucier) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:11:15 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <20060128.13471900.1110454661@landeck.jamesipoos.com> References: <43DA6994.8000008@math.purdue.edu> <20060128.13471900.1110454661@landeck.jamesipoos.com> Message-ID: <43E026D3.3040700@math.purdue.edu> James Lee wrote: > On 27/01/06, 18:42:28, Neal "A." Lucier wrote > regarding [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10: > >> My NFS server, where I install all the CSW packages, is running Solaris >> 10; however, all my clients are running Solaris 9. > >> This is causing some apps to fail in weird ways and others are failing >> in perfectly normal ways, like not being able to find the correct >> version of zlib. > >> So, I want to install all the 5.9 packages on my NFS server instead of >> the 5.10 packages. It looks like I could just change the following line >> in /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get: >> OSREV=`uname -r` >> to: >> OSREV=5.9 > >> Is this all I have to do and everything will "just work"? > > No. The OSREV is where pkg-get looks for the packages to download. > It forms a URL like $MIRROR/$CPU/$OSREV/$PACKAGE. This allows for it > to download packages specifically for your arch. Currently there are > no differences between 5.8, 5.9 and 5.10 and if you look closely you > will see that for stable the directories are symbolic links to 5.8, > (warning, this might change in the future). The reason for your > problems must be something else. > > Some packages compensate for the one file suits all arches by having a > postinstall or classes that do different things depending on the osrev, > sendmail is one example. I expect most of these are doing things in > /etc/ which you are not exporting anyway. I can see no reason why zlib > would have problems. > > Running ldd sometimes shows programs looking for a zlib version that > it can't find but this doesn't matter, ignore this: > > libz.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) > James, Thank you for your response. In checking unstable/sparc/5.10/ again I see that there are only 2 pkgs built for 5.10 (flightgear_base and tkdiff), neither of which I use, and I was unaware that the libz message didn't matter. The problem I was having was with: /opt/csw/bin/convert filename.ps filename.jpg producing bad jpg files. The user reported it working on 5.10 but not 5.9 when in reality '/usr/sfw/bin/convert' works on 5.10 and '/opt/csw/bin/convert' fails on both. I will see if I can get some test .ps files and perhaps file a bug report once I figure out more. Thanks, Neal From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 1 10:27:21 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:27:21 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <43E07EF9.4090507@wbonnet.net> hi >I get: >pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed > - open of failed, errno=2 >pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from >_______________________________________________ > > Are you sure that you used backquotes and not simple quote ? It looks like pkgadd tried to install package pwd, instead of looking in the current directory to find some packages. Kind regards, -- William http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3172 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From james at blastwave.org Wed Feb 1 11:00:57 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:00:57 GMT Subject: [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <43E026D3.3040700@math.purdue.edu> References: <43DA6994.8000008@math.purdue.edu> <20060128.13471900.1110454661@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <43E026D3.3040700@math.purdue.edu> Message-ID: <20060201.10005700.1020853563@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/02/06, 03:11:15, Neal "A." Lucier wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] solaris 9 pkgs on solaris 10: > Thank you for your response. In checking unstable/sparc/5.10/ again I > see that there are only 2 pkgs built for 5.10 (flightgear_base and > tkdiff), neither of which I use, and I was unaware that the libz message > didn't matter. Those 2 package are just wrongly labelled by naughty maintainers. They contain "all" arch files so no compilation and linking to system libs was done. The same package files are use for 5.8 and 5.9. > The problem I was having was with: > /opt/csw/bin/convert filename.ps filename.jpg > producing bad jpg files. Workarounds. Look in www.blastwave.org/testing/ and get: graphicsmagick-1.1.7-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz graphicsmagick-1.1.7-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Ref: http://www.graphicsmagick.org It's built in coexist mode (with imagemagick) so run: $ /opt/csw/bin/gm convert filename.ps filename.jpg graphicsmagick does several things better than imagemagick, especially multi-page conversion (not using 99GB of RAM). It's quicker too. Try using just Ghostscript to convert, after all the above only delegate the format conversions: $ gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=jpeg -r72 -sOutputFile=out.jpeg in.ps Ref: file:///opt/csw/doc/ghostscript/Devices.htm#JFIF James. From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Wed Feb 1 15:24:10 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:24:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Slightly OT: Package install from CD In-Reply-To: <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> References: <26AD5926-54F5-490C-BE96-77FE49A08FCD@adelphia.net> <3C2F0777-E9F9-4C5B-8784-4EA32646249D@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <43E0C48A.1060701@cognigencorp.com> instead of using "pkgadd -d `pwd` SUNWpkgname" try "pkgadd -d . SUNWpkgname" instead. Chris Turkel wrote: > On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > >>On 1/31/06, Chris Turkel wrote: >> >>>How does one install a package from Solaris install CD? I see a >>>folder with the package name but its not in pkg form. >> >>try >> >>pkgadd -d `pwd` >> >>see what happens in that directory .. you should get a list of >>packages to install. >> > > > I get: > pkgadd: ERROR; attempt to process datastream failed > - open of failed, errno=2 > pkgadd: ERROR: could not process datastream from > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 18:15:11 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:11 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] typo in pkg-get package Message-ID: The pkg-get package linked to in the HOWTO has a typo in the default pkg-get.conf file. There is a space after the "=" in the secondary mirror, so when you uncomment this line, it produces a warning that happily scrolls off of the screen # secondary US mirror #url= http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable should be # secondary US mirror #url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable On a related note, should the default be unstable, or stable? -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From tim.smith at degreec.com Wed Feb 1 18:09:58 2006 From: tim.smith at degreec.com (Tim Smith) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:09:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] typo in pkg-get package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43E0EB66.6030305@degreec.com> I've been using the stable, and had zero problems, for whatever its worth. Mark McCoy wrote: > The pkg-get package linked to in the HOWTO has a typo in the default > pkg-get.conf file. There is a space after the "=" in the secondary > mirror, so when you uncomment this line, it produces a warning that > happily scrolls off of the screen > > # secondary US mirror > #url= http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > should be > > # secondary US mirror > #url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > On a related note, should the default be unstable, or stable? > -- > Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek > > "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put > into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am > not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that > could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From pfelecan at blastwave.org Wed Feb 1 19:50:20 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:50:20 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060201 CVS in testing Message-ID: As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060201-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060201-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package once a month, until the public release. Enjoy -- Peter From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 19:58:13 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:58:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] typo in pkg-get package In-Reply-To: <43E0EB66.6030305@degreec.com> References: <43E0EB66.6030305@degreec.com> Message-ID: I'm referring not to the repository, but the default config file in the pkg_get.pkg that is linked to on the HOWTO page. If you install that package on a fresh machine, uncomment the secondary US mirror line, and do a 'pkg-get -U' you will see what I mean. I've always just known to delete that space, but after installing it on about half a dozen machines in the last few months it is one of those little annoyances ;-) On 2/1/06, Tim Smith wrote: > I've been using the stable, and had zero problems, for whatever its worth. > > Mark McCoy wrote: > > The pkg-get package linked to in the HOWTO has a typo in the default > > pkg-get.conf file. There is a space after the "=" in the secondary > > mirror, so when you uncomment this line, it produces a warning that > > happily scrolls off of the screen > > > > # secondary US mirror > > #url= http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > > > should be > > > > # secondary US mirror > > #url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable > > > > On a related note, should the default be unstable, or stable? -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 23:54:52 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:54:52 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OT: mod_fastcgi Message-ID: If there is anyone on this list who has compiled mod_fastcgi against the ap2_worker blastwave package please contact me off-list. It should be a straightforward compile, but I keep getting an error. -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 2 01:02:05 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:02:05 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060201 CVS in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43E14BFD.7090601@blastwave.org> Peter FELECAN wrote: > As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in > the testing area: Peter, Quite some time ago, I compiled exuberant ctags, in order to use ctags with vim. It turns out, however, that emacs includes it's own copy of ctags/etags. Is there any way to store the emacs ctags/etags in a private directory so only emacs has access to them, so I can have a ctags package install exuberant ctags into /opt/csw/bin? Thoughts? Cory. NOTE: There is a copy of my ctags package in /export/medusa/comand/staging/ctags. -- Cory Omand From pfelecan at blastwave.org Thu Feb 2 07:05:00 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:05:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060201 CVS in testing In-Reply-To: <43E14BFD.7090601@blastwave.org> (Cory Omand's message of "Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:02:05 -0800") References: <43E14BFD.7090601@blastwave.org> Message-ID: Cory Omand writes: > Peter FELECAN wrote: >> As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in >> the testing area: > > Peter, > > Quite some time ago, I compiled exuberant ctags, in order to use ctags > with vim. It turns out, however, that emacs includes it's own copy of > ctags/etags. Is there any way to store the emacs ctags/etags in a > private directory so only emacs has access to them, so I can have a > ctags package install exuberant ctags into /opt/csw/bin? > > Thoughts? Cory, I think that we already had this discussion. My opinion about this is: - Emacs ctags/etags is also used by other software --- not having it naturally accessible is uncomfortable; - if "exuberant ctags" is feature wise equivalent to the ctags version we can consider an "alternative" mechanism --- it permits to choose which ctags is used; Could you fill a feature request in mantis and stating clearly what is your desired behaviour? -- Peter From realmcking at gmail.com Thu Feb 2 16:35:20 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:35:20 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OT: mod_fastcgi Message-ID: Has anyone on this list used mod_fastcgi with the ap2_worker apache package? I have tried both the Makefile.AP2 that ships with mod_fastcgi and the "by hand" method of running "apxs -o mod_fastcgi.so -c *.c" and all I ever get is a .la file. I've been googling for hours now, and I can't find anyone else with a similar problem. :-( -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From a.cervellin at acm.org Thu Feb 2 21:48:51 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:48:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] libpcap 0.9.4 sparc available for testing Message-ID: <43E27033.8090702@acm.org> libpcap 0.9.4 sparc is now available for testing in http://www.blastwave.org/testing it would be great if anyone could test it, especially the sparcv8plus and sparcv9 libs. From suvsthyfju at hotmail.com Sun Feb 5 03:09:40 2006 From: suvsthyfju at hotmail.com (Frederick Kennedy) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:09:40 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Re [4]: Message-ID: <20060205021531.41988880EE@a.mx.projectdream.org> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: phantom.GIF Type: image/gif Size: 10554 bytes Desc: not available URL: From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 6 15:46:49 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:46:49 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] openldap_rt package problem Message-ID: <20060206084649.0000025c@sws602.mcsun.local> There is a problem with the CSWoldaprt - openldap_rt version 2.3.17 package that is in the unstable catalog today. I put an update for openldap_rt in testing. If you update from the unstable catalog, please replace openldap_rt version 2.3.17 with version 2.3.17,REV=2006.02.06 from http://www.blastwave.org/testing. The full urls are (may have wrapped): http://www.blastwave.org/testing/openldap_rt-2.3.17,REV=2006.02.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/openldap_rt-2.3.17,REV=2006.02.06-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Only sparc is affected; and then only when one of the several packages using the old 2.1.30 client libraries is run. Sorry for the problem, Alex -- From mark.round at gmail.com Mon Feb 6 16:16:16 2006 From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:16:16 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] New PostgreSQL 8.1.2 packages available Message-ID: <7b46f0de0602060716m1b32030dj2b5b0dd9f5f42297@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, New PostgreSQL and related packages (postgresql, libpq and postgresqlcontrib) have been released to the "unstable" tree. These packages bump the version to 8.1.2, and include a number of important bug fixes. Of particular importance is the resolution of a bug present in previous versions of PostgreSQL that could lead to data loss - for more details, please see the 8.1.2 release announcment[1]. A dump/restore is not required for those already running 8.1.x, unless you are affected by the locale or plperl issues described in the release notes. Thanks, -Mark mark at blastwave.org [1]=http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/release.html#RELEASE-8-1-2 From Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM Mon Feb 6 20:15:56 2006 From: Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM (Bob Doolittle) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:15:56 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing Message-ID: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> Hi, I seem to be encountering no end of missing package dependencies when trying to run ethereal. First it was missing the latest libcrypto.so from the openssl package. I was able to figure that out because I had an older version installed already so could identify the package needing updating via /var/sadm/install/contents. But now I am missing libpangocairo-1.0.so.0, and I don't have this anywhere on my system, so don't know what package to install. Also, using the search page on blastwave (http://www.blastwave.org/search.php) doesn't show anything. Isn't pkg-get supposed to handle all dependencies automatically? Is the package dependency info for ethereal broken somehow? I tried to clean everything up by doing pkgrm CSWethereal, and then pkg-get -i ethereal, but am still missing these dependencies... Finally - there's a new version of ethereal available (0.10.14). The version on blastwave is 0.10.13. Thanks for any help, Bob From Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM Mon Feb 6 20:22:58 2006 From: Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM (Bob Doolittle) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:22:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing In-Reply-To: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> References: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <43E7A212.3070503@Sun.COM> Never mind - updating libpango did the trick. I still wonder why pkg-get didn't handle the dependencies properly for me, however. -Bob Bob Doolittle wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to be encountering no end of missing > package dependencies when trying to run > ethereal. > > First it was missing the latest libcrypto.so from > the openssl package. I was able to figure that > out because I had an older version installed > already so could identify the package > needing updating via /var/sadm/install/contents. > > But now I am missing libpangocairo-1.0.so.0, > and I don't have this anywhere on my system, > so don't know what package to install. Also, > using the search page on blastwave > (http://www.blastwave.org/search.php) > doesn't show anything. > > Isn't pkg-get supposed to handle all dependencies > automatically? Is the package dependency info > for ethereal broken somehow? I tried to clean > everything up by doing pkgrm CSWethereal, > and then pkg-get -i ethereal, but am still missing > these dependencies... > > Finally - there's a new version of ethereal available > (0.10.14). The version on blastwave is 0.10.13. > > Thanks for any help, > Bob > > From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 20:37:09 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:37:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing In-Reply-To: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> References: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <43E7A565.4050406@acm.org> Bob Doolittle ha scritto: > Hi, > > Isn't pkg-get supposed to handle all dependencies > automatically? Is the package dependency info > for ethereal broken somehow? I tried to clean > everything up by doing pkgrm CSWethereal, > and then pkg-get -i ethereal, but am still missing > these dependencies... > > Finally - there's a new version of ethereal available > (0.10.14). The version on blastwave is 0.10.13. please can you try the ethereal version on http://www.blastwave.org/testing ? try it and let me know if you still have problems. Dependencies to be installed are: P CSWggettext P CSWglib2 P CSWgtk2 P CSWiconv P CSWlibpcap P CSWpango P CSWpcre P CSWzlib From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 20:40:28 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:40:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Package dependencies for ethereal missing In-Reply-To: <43E7A212.3070503@Sun.COM> References: <43E7A06C.3010805@Sun.COM> <43E7A212.3070503@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <43E7A62C.2040809@acm.org> Bob Doolittle ha scritto: > Never mind - updating libpango did the trick. > I still wonder why pkg-get didn't handle the > dependencies properly for me, however. Good to know :) Anyway i'm working to release 0.10.14, it will be available in the unstable tree ASAP. From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 22:11:11 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:11:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ethereal 0.10.14 Message-ID: <43E7BB6F.2090002@acm.org> ethereal 0.10.14 is now available on www.blastwave.org/testing for sparc and x86. anyone who had problems with the previous version is welcome to test this new pkg. :) Dependencies are: P CSWggettext P CSWglib2 P CSWgtk2 P CSWiconv P CSWlibpcap P CSWpango P CSWpcre P CSWzlib thanks, alessio From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 6 22:46:14 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:46:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pound 2.0.1 Message-ID: <43E7C3A6.7060309@acm.org> Pound 2.0.1 is now available for testing on www.blastwave.org/testing for both sparc & x86 From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Tue Feb 7 18:56:03 2006 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:56:03 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] kde: segmentation fault when compiling kile Message-ID: <43E8DF33.1090507@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i'm trying to compile kile, a front-end for latex http://kile.sourceforge.net/ I had installed kde from unstable sources (url=http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable) I am on solaris 10 sparc machine Here is the error: ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw/kde-gcc --with-qt-dir=/opt/csw/kde-gcc ... in config.log: configure:30747: /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/uic -L /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -impl actest.h actest.ui > actest.cpp ./configure: line 30748: 10796 Segmentation Fault /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/uic -L /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -impl actest.h actest.ui >actest.cpp here my packages: kdebase_gcc 3.4.3,REV=2006.01.08 kde_gcc 3.4.2,REV=2005.09.18 CSWqtgcc 3.3.4 kdelibs_gcc 3.4.2 i read the precedent thread about gcc, but don't understand how it applies to me This compilation worked well before i upgrade all my blastwave packages. If anybody can help, thanks in advance gerard From pfriedman at umuc.edu Wed Feb 8 22:41:30 2006 From: pfriedman at umuc.edu (Peter Friedman) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:41:30 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list Message-ID: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Yesterday, I tried to dive into Blastwave by putting together an apache2/php/mysql install on my sparc Solaris 8 system. I downloaded the mysql4rt, apache2, php5, php5_mysql, and ap2_modphp5 packages. I created two simple scripts to test the installation, one which just contains a call to phpinfo(), and another which attempts to connect to an existing mysql database. The first script works, and reports PHP version 5.1.2, but does not show that the mysql library is available. The mysql test script fails, and "Call to undefined function mysql_connect()" appears in the Apache log. Also, in the Apache log at server startup, there are multiple "Unable to initialize module" errors. As an additional test, I ran the scripts using the command line php (/opt/csw/bin/php5). Both scripts ran without problems. I noticed that the phpinfo() indicated a php version of 5.0.5. The problem, apparently, is that the version of php5 and php5_mysql is behind the version of php in ap2_modphp5. The errors in the Apache log show that the modphp5 module refuses to load various libraries, mysql included, due to a version mismatch. On http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php the versions of the latest packages involved are reported as: ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 php5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 php5_mysql 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 However, even after updating my package catalog with pkg-get -U, it appears that the actual versions of the available packages are: ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 php5 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 php5_mysql 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 I visited several mirror sites and pulled down their catalog files, and also looked at the names of the actual files. On all the mirrors, the php5 and php5_mysql packages were at version 5.0.5. From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Feb 8 23:10:36 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:10:36 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Message-ID: On 2/8/06, Peter Friedman wrote: > Yesterday, I tried to dive into Blastwave by putting together an > apache2/php/mysql install on my sparc Solaris 8 system. I downloaded the > mysql4rt, apache2, php5, php5_mysql, and ap2_modphp5 packages. Out of curiosity .. what do you mean by "downloaded" ? Do you mean that you typed pkg-get -i apache2 ? Dennis From pfriedman at umuc.edu Wed Feb 8 23:16:08 2006 From: pfriedman at umuc.edu (Peter Friedman) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:16:08 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Message-ID: <43EA6DA8.4080004@umuc.edu> Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Out of curiosity .. what do you mean by "downloaded" ? > > Do you mean that you typed pkg-get -i apache2 ? Yes, that's right. Pretend that I said "installed via pkg-get". From comand at blastwave.org Wed Feb 8 23:22:07 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:22:07 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> Message-ID: <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> Peter Friedman wrote: > On http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php the versions of the latest > packages involved are reported as: > ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > php5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > php5_mysql 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > > However, even after updating my package catalog with pkg-get -U, it > appears that the actual versions of the available packages are: > ap2_modphp5 5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04 > php5 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 > php5_mysql 5.0.5,REV=2005.10.05 The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. Sorry for any inconvenience, C. -- Cory Omand From dvm105 at psu.edu Wed Feb 8 23:28:02 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:28:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <43EA7072.9060308@psu.edu> Cory Omand wrote: > The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try > updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. Is there going to be any permanent fix to this catalog sync'ing problem? It seems to be cropping up every week these days. -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From pfriedman at umuc.edu Wed Feb 8 23:39:44 2006 From: pfriedman at umuc.edu (Peter Friedman) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:39:44 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <43EA7330.9060703@umuc.edu> Cory Omand wrote: > > The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try > updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. I just want to confirm, in case I'm missing something. When you say "try updating your local catalog", do you mean pkg-get -U or something else? From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 00:08:17 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] ANNOUNCE: Package Update Underway Message-ID: <43EA79E1.6040402@blastwave.org> Quite a few new packages are currently being released into the blastwave unstable catalog this week. Please be aware that the unstable catalog may be temporarily out of sync. If you encounter any issues related to package versions, please try updating your local catalog, and check http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/mirrorStatus.jsp to ensure that your selected mirror is up to date. The following is a summary of changes making their way to the catalog -- please note that some packages listed below may not be available at your local mirror at the time of this notice. perl: The Perl package is now at version 5.8.8. Perl 5.8.8 will continue to load modules which were built for Perl 5.8.7. Perl has also changed to use berkeleydb 4.3 as the DB_File backend. This was a necessary change to allow DB_File to be used with mod_perl. Tests indicate that no action should be required when accessing DB_File databases created with the last release of Perl. However, if you do encounter issues loading existing DB_File databases, the usual dump/reload procedure can be used to update the database for use with bdb43. E.g.: $ /opt/csw/bin/db_dump old.db | /opt/csw/bdb43/bin/db_load new.db $ mv new.db old.db apache2: The Apache package is now at version 2.2.0. Existing configuration httpd.conf and ssl.conf files will be updated to 2.2.0 syntax at install time. A supplementary script is provided (apache2/sbin/update20to22) which can be used to upgrade additional configuration files. The changes to syntax are: o mod_auth is now split out into a number of separate modules, all of which will initially be enabled in httpd.conf. o IfModule directives now use 'module_' syntax instead of '.c'. By default, Apache 2.2.0 now splits most configuration sections out into separate files in etc/extra (e.g. etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf). All blastwave ap2 modules will now write initial configuration into this directory, and write a single Include line into httpd.conf. Aside from these changes, there may be some changes specific to certain authentication and authorization modules. The changes are minor, normally limited to directive name changes. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html for complete details. php5: The PHP 5 suite of packages is now at version 5.1.2. This release includes a new php5_wddx package, PDO support, as well as support for net-snmp 5.3 in php5_snmp. A small utility 'php5/bin/phpext' is now included which can be used to query, enable, and disable php5 extensions in php.ini. This is used by extension package pre/postinstall/remove scripts, and can be used by other packages to query whether certain modules are installed. For example: -bash# /opt/csw/php5/bin/phpext -q mbstring wddx mbstring_enabled=true wddx_enabled=false -bash# subversion: Subversion is now updated to version 1.3.0. This release uses BerkeleyDB 4.3.29 for bdb repositories. For users updating from the latest 1.2.3 release, which used BerkeleyDB 4.3.27, there are no actions required. Users upgrading from prior releases should read the upgrade notes found on the mantis news page for subversion. Note that since subversion 1.2.0, the default repository type has been fsfs, so most users will not need to worry about bdb repositories in the first place. ruby: Ruby is now updated to version 1.8.4. This release now allows full support of Rails on Blastwave. samp: SAMP, Solaris/Apache/MySQL/Perl-Python-PHP5, is a bundle package which installs everything required for a Solaris based application server. Language integration is via Apache 2.2.0 modules, mod_perl 2.0.2, mod_python 3.1.4, and php 5.1.2. MySQL 4.1 is the database backend, and SQLite 3 is included for lightweight database integration. Other notable new packages: rapidsvn 0.9.0 - Subversion GUI built on wxWidgets svk 1.06 - Distributed version control with Subversion trac 0.9.3 - Integrated SCM and project management interface clearsilver - Language neutral templating pysqlite2 - Python support for SQLite 3.x libapreq2/ap2_modapreq2 2.06 - Apache Request library berkeleydb44 4.4.20 - BerkeleyDB 4.4.20 -- Cory Omand From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 00:11:54 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:11:54 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Available php5 version inconsistent with posted package list In-Reply-To: <43EA7330.9060703@umuc.edu> References: <43EA658A.9030308@umuc.edu> <43EA6F0F.9070704@blastwave.org> <43EA7330.9060703@umuc.edu> Message-ID: <43EA7ABA.5030400@blastwave.org> Peter Friedman wrote: > Cory Omand wrote: >> The catalogs are probably a bit out of sync at the moment. Please try >> updating your local catalog and check again to for the 5.1.2 php5 packages. > > I just want to confirm, in case I'm missing something. When you say "try > updating your local catalog", do you mean pkg-get -U or something else? I mean 'pkg-get -U', however, I just checked ibiblio, which is apparently up to date, and it still shows that the extension modules and php5 core are 5.0.5, but ap2_modphp5 is 5.1.2. I have notified the release manager, so hopefully this will be cleared up soon. Sorry for the inconvenience, Cory. -- Cory Omand From ger at accepte.nl Thu Feb 9 14:15:00 2006 From: ger at accepte.nl (ger at accepte.nl) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:15:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc Message-ID: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> Hey Group, While trying to get php 5.0.5 to run, I encountered the following problem: [Thu Feb 09 13:06:28 2006] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart PHP Warning: PHP Startup: \xfd\xe2X`\xfd\xdf\x9b\xe4: Unable to initialize module\nModule compiled with module API=20041030, debug=1, thread-safety=0\nPHP compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0, thread-safety=0\nThese options need to match\n in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/debug-non-zts-20041030/dom.so' - ld.so.1: /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/debug-non-zts-20041030/dom.so: symbol _zval_ptr_dtor_wrapper: referenced symbol not found in Unknown on line 0 (snipped some output) It appears the php5 extensions were compiled for a different version? I already checked to see if it could be something I've done wrong but a complete reinstall of the php5 package did not help. Is it possible that the package (php5 unstable) has been shipped with binary incompatible extensions? The following extensions appear to be incompatible: dom.so exif.so iconv.so mbstring.so soap.so sockets.so What can I do to get these extensions to load? Apache2 and PHP5 both work as expected in all other respects. The server is Solaris 9 sparc. TIA, Ger Schinkel From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Feb 9 15:39:07 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:39:07 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ANNOUNCE: XEmacs 21.4.19 in testing Message-ID: <43EB540B.8010509@cognigencorp.com> Hello All, XEmacs 21.4.19 is available for testing, the i386 and sparc packages can be downloaded from http://www.blastwave.org/testing/. XEmacs has been built with the Athena widget set, MULE (multi-lingual Emacs) support and includes the efs-1.33, xemacs-base-2.01, and mule-base-1.47 add-on packages. This XEmacs build does NOT include Motif support. This is do to a bug i discovery where XEmacs locks up and crashes when Adobe Acrobat 7.x+ is running. I will no longer be including Motif support in the XEmacs builds, sorry. A complete description of build is included below. Enjoy. Installation description (M-x describe-installation) uname -a: SunOS ra 5.8 Generic_117350-28 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 ./configure '--prefix=/opt/csw/xemacs' '--site-prefixes=/opt/csw' '--with-sound=native,nonas,noesd' '--with-ldap=no' '--with-postgresql=no' '--with-database=dbm' '--with-ncurses' '--with-widgets=athena' '--with-dialogs=athena' '--with-mule' '--with-xfs' '--without-xim' XEmacs 21.4.19 "Constant Variable" configured for `sparc-sun-solaris2.8'. Compilation / Installation: Source code location: /export/medusa/darin/build/xemacs-21.4.19 Installation prefix: /opt/csw/xemacs Additional prefixes: /opt/csw Runtime library search path: /opt/csw/lib Operating system description file: `s/sol2.h' Machine description file: `m/sparc.h' Compiler: cc -v -xO4 Compiler version: cc: Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07 Relocating allocator for buffers: yes GNU version of malloc: yes libc: SUNWcsl 11.8.0,REV=2000.01.08.18.12 Window System: Compiling in support for the X window system: - X Windows headers location: - X Windows libraries location: - Xau (X authority) not available. - Handling WM_COMMAND properly. Compiling in support for the Athena widget set: - Athena headers location: X11/Xaw - Athena library to link: Xaw Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena dialog boxes. Using Athena native widgets. TTY: Compiling in support for ncurses. Images: Compiling in support for GIF images (builtin). Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for PNG images. Compiling in support for JPEG images. Compiling in support for TIFF images. Sound: Compiling in support for sound (native). Databases: Compiling in support for DBM. Internationalization: Compiling in support for Mule (multi-lingual Emacs). - Using XFontSet to provide bilingual menubar. Mail: Compiling in support for "dot-locking" mail spool file locking method. Other Features: Inhibiting IPv6 canonicalization at startup. Compiling in support for dynamic shared object modules. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 18:37:56 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:37:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc In-Reply-To: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> References: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> Message-ID: <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> ger at accepte.nl wrote: > What can I do to get these extensions to load? Apache2 and PHP5 both work as > expected in all other respects. Please check your apache2 and php5 versions. Apache2 2.2.0 requires the php5 5.1.2 package set (ap2 module + extensions), while Apache2 2.0.55 requires the php5 5.0.5 package set. The former is the 'unstable' release, and the latter is the 'stable' package set. There was a bit of lag in the catalog, due to the number of packages in this release, so you might try updating your catalog and checking that you have the most recent version of all apache2 and php5 related packages. HTH, Cory. -- Cory Omand From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Feb 9 21:04:38 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:04:38 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...] Message-ID: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> this came into the kde-solaris list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:18:16 -0500 From: Reply-To: For people using KDE on Solaris, with questions about KDE or Solaris To: *Hello,* ** *I hate to be a 'Chicken Little', but I ran pkg-get upgrade on my Solaris 10 SunBlade 100 and now I can't log into KDE. I had been running KDE 3.4.2 (REV=2005.9.18) with no problems for a while now and during the upgrade, I noticed that only kde_base was getting upgraded to 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08), while the rest of KDE was not. I didn't think anything of it at the time, but after rebooting, I can't log in to KDE. The OpenWindows desktop starts to load, I see the KDM loading screen, then a KDE error message pops up showing the 'bomb and gear' icon, but there is no text in the error message, and then everything just freezes. I have to power off the box and choose a different desktop session to actually log in.* ** *Is there a way to roll back the kde_base package to the previous version? If not, does anyone have an idea as to how I can begin diagnosing this problem, seeing as I can't even log in to KDE?* ** *Many thanks in advance,* ** ** *Evan D. Bradley* This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: file:///tmp/nsmail.txt URL: From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 9 21:27:18 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:27:18 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] CSWsvn and libuuid on Solaris 8 Message-ID: <43EBA5A6.8030406@blastwave.org> Some users have been reporting that, when trying to invoke the 'svn' they see the following: $ svn --version ld.so.1: svn: fatal: libuuid.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed If you see this, please apply patch 115831-01 (SPARC), or 115832-01 (x86) to your affected systems. - C. -- Cory Omand From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Feb 9 21:35:51 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:35:51 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] New netsnmp-5.3.0.1 package Message-ID: <20060209203551.GA18347@colnet> I'm having problems after installing the new netsnmp package. Whereas with the original package, I have some scripts that reliably queried my router using snmpwalk to extract and print information like the WAN IP address assigned to it, with the new package I get a lot of errors when I invoke snmpwalk, and no information: $ snmpwalk -c public 192.168.123.123 >/dev/null Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UDP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (HOST-RESOURCES-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-SMI): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (DISMAN-EVENT-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (DISMAN-SCHEDULE-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-SNMP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DEMO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-TARGET-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DISKIO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (LM-SENSORS-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (MTA-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DLMOD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-MPD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-TM): At line 0 in (none) Now, SNMP is not one of my strengths. Can someone determine if this is a package problem or perhaps a change in the command itself or the need for me to supply ancillary information elsewhere that I need to take into consideration? Help! Thanks, Rob From ger at accepte.nl Fri Feb 10 12:23:14 2006 From: ger at accepte.nl (ger at accepte.nl) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:23:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc In-Reply-To: <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> References: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <200602101223.14739.ger@accepte.nl> On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:37, Cory Omand wrote: > Please check your apache2 and php5 versions. Apache2 2.2.0 requires the > php5 5.1.2 package set (ap2 module + extensions), while Apache2 2.0.55 > requires the php5 5.0.5 package set. The former is the 'unstable' > release, and the latter is the 'stable' package set. There was a bit of > lag in the catalog, due to the number of packages in this release, so > you might try updating your catalog and checking that you have the most > recent version of all apache2 and php5 related packages. bash-2.05# ./apachectl -v Server version: Apache/2.2.0 Server built: Jan 30 2006 21:12:16 PHP version is 5.1.2 Weird thing is that when I click on 'view files in package' on the website for PHP5, it says that the extensions dir should be no-debug-non-zts-20050922, while it is debug-non-zts-20041030 for me. I double checked by removing the package altogether, but the PHP5.1.2 really contains that directory. Could this break things? Or should I try a different mirror? On a sidenote: I first went for the stable tree, but there was no ap2_modphp5 package on any mirror for download, so that didn't work out. (solaris 9, sparc) TIA, Ger Schinkel From blastwave at tomseeley.co.uk Fri Feb 10 15:37:19 2006 From: blastwave at tomseeley.co.uk (tom @ blastwave) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:37:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...] In-Reply-To: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> References: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <43ECA51F.9040200@tomseeley.co.uk> Darin Perusich wrote: > *I hate to be a 'Chicken Little', but I ran pkg-get upgrade on my > Solaris 10 SunBlade 100 and now I can't log into KDE. I had been > running KDE 3.4.2 (REV=2005.9.18) with no problems for a while now and > during the upgrade, I noticed that only kde_base was getting upgraded to > 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08), while the rest of KDE was not. I didn't think > anything of it at the time, but after rebooting, I can't log in to KDE. > The OpenWindows desktop starts to load, I see the KDM loading screen, > then a KDE error message pops up showing the 'bomb and gear' icon, but > there is no text in the error message, and then everything just > freezes. I have to power off the box and choose a different desktop > session to actually log in.* I experienced exactly the same behavior after installing kde_gcc on a fresh solaris 9 (sparc) install. On reading the above I downgraded kdebase_gcc to 3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20. This solved the lack of text problem, but not the crashing. On login kded and kcminit crash, kded does so repeatedly, gdb tries to get a backtrace but apparently there aren't any symbols available. Tom. From EBradley at williams-int.com Fri Feb 10 17:38:57 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:38:57 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...] Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40134FBF8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Actually, I sent the original message to the solaris-KDE list, and Darin forwarded it here on my behalf. Tom, how did you downgrade kdebase_gcc? Was it a function of pkg-get itself, or did you just manually install the older version of kdebase_gcc? I'm sorry to hear that it didn't fix the problem, but I'd like to know how to downgrade packages using pkg-get in the future should something like this happen again. Thanks, Evan Tom wrote: >I experienced exactly the same behavior after installing kde_gcc on a >fresh solaris 9 (sparc) install. On reading the above I downgraded >kdebase_gcc to 3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20. This solved the lack of text >problem, but not the crashing. On login kded and kcminit crash, kded >does so repeatedly, gdb tries to get a backtrace but apparently there >aren't any symbols available. > > >Tom. Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From mmayer at blastwave.org Fri Feb 10 17:45:16 2006 From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:45:16 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... In-Reply-To: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> References: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <20060210164516.GA6763@enterprise.blastwave.org> > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:18:16 -0500 > From: > Reply-To: For people using KDE on Solaris, with questions about KDE or > Solaris > To: > > > > *Hello,* > ** > *I hate to be a 'Chicken Little', but I ran pkg-get upgrade on my > Solaris 10 SunBlade 100 and now I can't log into KDE. I had been > running KDE 3.4.2 (REV=2005.9.18) with no problems for a while now and > during the upgrade, I noticed that only kde_base was getting upgraded to > 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08), while the rest of KDE was not. This problem, I am pretty sure, is related to Bug 1455 (http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1455). Somehow all the binaries in kdebase 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08) got linked to both CSWqt and CSWqtgcc. > Is there a way to roll back the kde_base package to the previous > version? Yes, get the latest kdebase version from stable (using your favorite mirror), say: $ wget http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable/sparc/5.8/kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz then remove the existing CSWkdebasegcc package and install the one from stable you just downloaded. Hope that helps. Regards, Markus From james at blastwave.org Fri Feb 10 18:42:22 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:42:22 GMT Subject: [csw-users] [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE... In-Reply-To: <20060210164516.GA6763@enterprise.blastwave.org> References: <43EBA056.6020404@cognigencorp.com> <20060210164516.GA6763@enterprise.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <20060210.17422200.3624130097@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 10/02/06, 16:45:16, Markus Mayer wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] [kde-solaris] Pkg-get upgrade broke my KDE...: > This problem, I am pretty sure, is related to Bug 1455 > (http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1455). > Somehow all the binaries in kdebase 3.4.3 (REV=2006.01.08) got linked > to both CSWqt and CSWqtgcc. On its own this shouldn't be enough to cause problems. It is allowable to have both QTs installed for other reasons. The problem is the RPATH: $ dump -Lv /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/konsole | grep RPATH [40] RPATH /opt/csw/lib:/opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib:/opt/csw/gcc3/lib:/usr/openwin/lib It needs /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib first. As a workaround try forcing it first with LD_LIBRARY_PATH. $ ldd /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/konsole | grep qt libqt-mt.so.3 => /opt/csw/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib ldd /opt/csw/kde-gcc/bin/konsole | grep qt libqt-mt.so.3 => /opt/csw/kde-gcc/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 James. From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Feb 10 19:46:41 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:46:41 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] tcpdump 3.9.4 now available in testing Message-ID: <43ECDF91.9090808@acm.org> tcpdump 3.9.4 for sparc & x86 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing dependencies are: P CSWossl From comand at blastwave.org Fri Feb 10 21:28:25 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:28:25 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] php5 on solaris sparc In-Reply-To: <200602101223.14739.ger@accepte.nl> References: <200602091415.00413.ger@accepte.nl> <43EB7DF4.1010003@blastwave.org> <200602101223.14739.ger@accepte.nl> Message-ID: <43ECF769.2030604@blastwave.org> ger at accepte.nl wrote: > bash-2.05# ./apachectl -v > Server version: Apache/2.2.0 > Server built: Jan 30 2006 21:12:16 > > PHP version is 5.1.2 > > Weird thing is that when I click on 'view files in package' on the website for > PHP5, it says that the extensions dir should be no-debug-non-zts-20050922, > while it is debug-non-zts-20041030 for me. I double checked by removing the > package altogether, but the PHP5.1.2 really contains that directory. Could > this break things? Or should I try a different mirror If possible, please check your packages against a different mirror. The 'debug-non-zts-20041030' directory is from the 5.0.5 version of PHP5, while the no-debug-non-zts-20050922 directory is used by 5.1.2 extensions. Therefore, you could have a mix of 5.0.5 and 5.1.2 packages on your system. HTH, - C. -- Cory Omand From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Sat Feb 11 05:29:02 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:29:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with bad perl / mod_perl interaction Message-ID: <20060211042901.GA28419@stampfli> I just upgraded CSWperl (to 5.8.8) but found that my Apache web server would not come up after doing so. The problem is that CSWmodperl is still expecting the old perl (5.8.7) and cannot find things in the new hierarchy. If you don't use mod_perl, this upgrade will not be a problem for you. However, if you do encounter this problem, here is a quick and dirty work-around that seems to work for me: ln -s 5.8.8 /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.7 Rob From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Feb 11 05:41:50 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:41:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] nagios - nagiosp - nrpe update Message-ID: <20060210224150.000075f3@sws602.mcsun.local> With a recent update to the nagiosp package, nrpe is now a separate package. However, the check_nrpe plugin is still distributed with the nagios server package. After you update nagiosp to version 1.4.2,REV=2006.02.09, and if you use nrpe, please install nrpe with pkg-get. Also included with the nrpe package are files and instructions for adding nrpe to SMF on Solaris 10 and later. This is only useful if you run nrpe as a daemon. So, if you want to use SMF, you need to do the few steps of installation manually, as outlined in README-SMF.CSW. nagios is updated to version 2.0. The most recent package version is 2.0,REV=2006.02.09. This is a big (and good) update and you may have to change your configuration files. See the 'what's new' section of the html documentation for a list of the changes. I think that I also changed my email notification macros to use $SHORTDATETIME$ instead of $DATETIME$. But I am not sure of when I did this; since I have been running beta versions of 2.0 for a few months now. The older nrpe package version 1.3 is not compatible with nagios 2.0, so remember to install nrpe if you need it. Alex -- From a.cervellin at acm.org Sat Feb 11 21:46:27 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:46:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Seamonkey 1.0 available for testing Message-ID: <43EE4D23.3070204@acm.org> Seamonkey 1.0 (aka mozilla suite 1.8.0.1) is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing for Sparc and x86. Dependencies are: P CSWbonobo2 P CSWfconfig P CSWftype2 P CSWgconf2 P CSWggettext P CSWglib2 P CSWgnomekeyring P CSWgnomevfs2 P CSWgtk2 P CSWiconv P CSWlibart P CSWlibatk P CSWlibbonoboui P CSWlibcairo P CSWlibgnome P CSWlibgnomecanvas P CSWlibgnomeui P CSWlibidl P CSWlibnet P CSWlibpopt P CSWlibxft2 P CSWlibxml2 P CSWlibxrender P CSWorbit2 P CSWpango P CSWzlib From comand at blastwave.org Sat Feb 11 22:30:30 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:30:30 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Perl 5.8.8 and CSWmodperl Message-ID: <43EE5776.8070606@blastwave.org> NOTICE: If you make use of Apache 1.3.x and CSWmodperl, and have recently upgraded to the latest version of Perl in unstable, please read the following notice. If you are using Apache 2.x and CSWap2modperl, you can safely ignore this message. It was recently reported that Apache 1.3.x and CSWmodperl are impacted by the new perl 5.8.8 package released to unstable. When restarting the apache server after updating perl, server startup will report the following error: bash$ /etc/init.d/cswapache start [Sat Feb 11 13:25:52 2006] [error] Can't locate strict.pm in @INC [...] This is due to the fact that mod_perl 1.x appears to embed a static @INC path from the version of perl that it was compiled with. It will not get a new @INC path from perl, as mod_perl 2.x will. Until a new version of mod_perl 1.x is released, it is recommended that you *not* update your perl package, if possible. If you have already updated, or require perl 5.8.8 for some other reason, there is a simple workaround for apache and mod_perl. Add the following lines to the top of your /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl: PERL5LIB=/opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8:/opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8 export PERL5LIB This will allow your server to start up and locate the core perl modules. Sorry for any inconvenience, - C. -- Cory Omand From nico at sonycom.com Mon Feb 13 15:57:58 2006 From: nico at sonycom.com (Nico De Ranter) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:57:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl Message-ID: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Hi, I'm trying to compile a bunch of modules for Perl (stable/5.8 repository). Unfortunately I can't compile modules that contain C code as these have to be compiled with exactly the same compiler as the one perl was compiled with. So: anybody any idea which compiler was used to compiler perl (not gcc apparently)? Nico -- --------------------------------------------------------- "It has been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." --------------------------------------------------------- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium Telephone: +32 (0)2 700 86 41 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 86 22 From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 13 16:13:36 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:13:36 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> References: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: <20060213091336.000002db@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:57:58 +0100 Nico De Ranter wrote: > I'm trying to compile a bunch of modules for Perl (stable/5.8 > repository). Unfortunately I can't compile modules that contain C code > as these have to be compiled with exactly the same compiler as the one > perl was compiled with. So: anybody any idea which compiler was used > to compiler perl (not gcc apparently)? Correct, not gcc, at least on the modules that I am aware of. Sun's Studio 8 is typically used. There may be some built with Studio 10, but I am not sure. You may be able to use Sun's Studio 11, which I think is now available for no charge. Previous to Studio 11, Sun's compilers did cost a bit of money. Always use LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST:/opt/csw/lib'. I also use CFLAGS='O -xarch=[v8 or 386]' and put /opt/csw/bin in PATH before any other directories that have the perl binary. Since the blastwave modules are build with INSTALLDIRS=vendor, the following is revised for what you probably want. perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/opt/csw INSTALLDIRS=site gmake gmake test (optional) MAKE=gmake stagepkg (if you want to make a package) Alex -- From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Feb 13 16:19:14 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: On 13/2/06 2:57, Nico De Ranter wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile a bunch of modules for Perl (stable/5.8 > repository). Unfortunately I can't compile modules that contain C code > as these have to be compiled with exactly the same compiler as the one > perl was compiled with. So: anybody any idea which compiler was used to > compiler perl (not gcc apparently)? % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V [...] ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; [...] I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. Cheers, Chris From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 13 16:33:00 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:33:00 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: References: <1139842678.17388.99.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: <20060213093300.000002e1@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 Chris Ridd wrote: > % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V > [...] > ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; > [...] > > I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part > of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary objects. Alex From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Feb 13 16:58:07 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:58:07 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <20060213093300.000002e1@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: On 13/2/06 3:33, Alex Moore wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V >> [...] >> ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; >> [...] >> >> I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part >> of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. > > I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio > 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. I'd be surprised if Studio 11-built shared objects weren't compatible (though the reverse might not be.) > Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use > with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary > objects. Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were used to build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" and to use them directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl module is nowadays) do all this stuff for you automagically anyway? Cheers, Chris From nico at sonycom.com Mon Feb 13 17:07:46 2006 From: nico at sonycom.com (Nico De Ranter) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:07:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1139846866.17388.102.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Thanks, I'll give it a try. Nico On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 15:58 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 13/2/06 3:33, Alex Moore wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 > > Chris Ridd wrote: > > > >> % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V > >> [...] > >> ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; > >> [...] > >> > >> I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part > >> of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. > > > > I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio > > 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. > > I'd be surprised if Studio 11-built shared objects weren't compatible > (though the reverse might not be.) > > > Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use > > with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary > > objects. > > Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were used to > build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" and to use them > directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl module is nowadays) do all > this stuff for you automagically anyway? > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- --------------------------------------------------------- "It has been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." --------------------------------------------------------- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium Telephone: +32 (0)2 700 86 41 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 86 22 From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Feb 13 17:27:45 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:27:45 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: References: <20060213093300.000002e1@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <20060213102745.0000277e@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:58:07 +0000 Chris Ridd wrote: > Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were > used to build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" > and to use them directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl > module is nowadays) do all this stuff for you automagically anyway? Probably so, if the module uses MakeMaker; and that is the norm. There are variations on what gets pulled in. I have a few that use Module::Build. Alex -- From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Feb 13 21:15:58 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:15:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] amsn 0.95 available for testing Message-ID: <43F0E8FE.4090703@acm.org> amsn 0.95 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing this version it's not pure tcl/tk like 0.94, so there are 2 different archs (sparc & x86). Note: when you'll start it, you'll get a warning about a missing trayicon plugin (that's normal, it's only for the linux version) Dependencies: P CSWgcc3corert P CSWgcc3g++rt P CSWtcl P CSWtk P CSWtcltls From nico at sonycom.com Tue Feb 14 16:02:10 2006 From: nico at sonycom.com (Nico De Ranter) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:02:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiling modules for Perl In-Reply-To: <1139846866.17388.102.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> References: <1139846866.17388.102.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Message-ID: <1139929330.17388.152.camel@zebra.sonytel.be> Yep, after installing Studio 11 and adding it to my path I can run /opt/csw/bin/perl -MCPAN -e 'install ...' and everything compiles and installs automaticaly. Thanks! Nico On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 17:07 +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote: > Thanks, I'll give it a try. > > Nico > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 15:58 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > > On 13/2/06 3:33, Alex Moore wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:14 +0000 > > > Chris Ridd wrote: > > > > > >> % /opt/csw/bin/perl -V > > >> [...] > > >> ccversion='Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07'; > > >> [...] > > >> > > >> I'm using the unstable branch, so YMMV. Sun C 5.8 appears to be part > > >> of Studio 11, so I guess Sun C 5.7 is part of Studio 10. > > > > > > I just compiled a module that built a shared object library with Studio > > > 11, so that appears to be the simplest and least expensive method. > > > > I'd be surprised if Studio 11-built shared objects weren't compatible > > (though the reverse might not be.) > > > > > Also, take note of the blastwave build standards for options to use > > > with Studio 11. Or you may end up with some larger than necessary > > > objects. > > > > Good point, though since perl also knows what compiler flags were used to > > build it it seems reasonable to assume those are "correct" and to use them > > directly. Doesn't MakeMaker (or whatever the perl module is nowadays) do all > > this stuff for you automagically anyway? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- --------------------------------------------------------- "It has been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." --------------------------------------------------------- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da Vincilaan 7-D1 B-1935 Zaventem, Belgium Telephone: +32 (0)2 700 86 41 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 86 22 From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Wed Feb 15 21:53:24 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:53:24 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd Message-ID: I just realized that pureftpd is a CSW package while I've been trying to get it to compile with the TLS options. Is there someway for me to find out what options were enabled in the pureftpd package ? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 15 22:04:51 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:04:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43F39773.4080707@acm.org> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I just realized that pureftpd is a CSW package while I've been trying to > get it to compile with the TLS options. Is there someway for me to find > out what options were enabled in the pureftpd package ? --prefix=/opt/csw --with-openssl=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-tls --with-largefile --with-everything --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 15 22:27:13 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:27:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] balance 3.32 now available Message-ID: <43F39CB1.1050402@acm.org> Balance 3.32 (a new pkg for blastwave) is now ready for testing on http://www.blaswave.org/testing No dependencies needed. What is Balance? Balance is a surprisingly successful load balancing solution being a simple but powerful generic tcp proxy with round robin load balancing and failover mechanisms. Its behaviour can be controlled at runtime using a simple command line syntax. More info at: http://www.inlab.de/balance.html From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Wed Feb 15 22:45:49 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:45:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd Message-ID: Excellent, thank you very much. The README file in the pureftpd source says that --with-everything includes external authentication. Does that mean that --with-everything includes the features of --with-MySQL ? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alessio Cervellin Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 4:05 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I just realized that pureftpd is a CSW package while I've been trying > to get it to compile with the TLS options. Is there someway for me to > find out what options were enabled in the pureftpd package ? --prefix=/opt/csw --with-openssl=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-tls --with-largefile --with-everything --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 15 22:50:17 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:50:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Compiled options for pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43F3A219.3020101@acm.org> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > Excellent, thank you very much. The README file in the pureftpd source > says that --with-everything includes external authentication. Does that > mean that --with-everything includes the features of --with-MySQL ? i'm sorry but i've no idea, i don't know the package pureftpd (and the maintainer of it left the blastwave community times ago...) From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 02:02:24 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:02:24 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] openldap alert! Message-ID: <20060215190224.00005dad@sws602.mcsun.local> See http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001478 for details Alex -- From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 02:51:39 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:39 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] openldap alert followup Message-ID: <20060215195139.0000366d@sws602.mcsun.local> New packages are in http://www.blastwave.org/testing for openldap openldap_client openldap_rt They will be at the mirrors within the next few days, if not sooner. These packages are compatible with the current perl and berkeleydb43 packages. If it matters to anyone, I had to add --enable-perl=no to openldap's configure. Alex -- From strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu Thu Feb 16 03:27:46 2006 From: strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu (Dan Stromberg) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:27:46 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] MySQL 5, PHP 5, Apache 2 Message-ID: <1140056867.24382.185.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> Hi folks. I'm trying to get MySQL 5, PHP 5 and Apache 2 onto a Solaris 9/sparc system, and working in tandem. However, although I've used blastwave to install MySQL 5, PHP 5 and Apache 2 on the system, when I look in phpinfo, phpinfo believes that I'm using MySQL 4. This seems weird. :) Is it possible that what I really have is PHP 5 accessing MySQL 5 via the MySQL 4 client API? And if so, am I missing out on anything? And does blastwave have a true MySQL 5/PHP 5/Apache 2 combination available? Thanks! From comand at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 18:13:56 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] MySQL 5, PHP 5, Apache 2 In-Reply-To: <1140056867.24382.185.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> References: <1140056867.24382.185.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> Message-ID: <43F4B2D4.208@blastwave.org> Dan Stromberg wrote: > Is it possible that what I really have is PHP 5 accessing MySQL 5 via > the MySQL 4 client API? And if so, am I missing out on anything? I did a bit of investigation on php5 and MySQL 5, and found that the mysqli extension (php5_mysqli) does in fact support some of the new MySQL 5 features (specifically, I found a note about cursor support). There should be no problem with linking the php5 MySQL extension to MySQL 5 and then accessing a MySQL 4 server, therefore I will relink the mysql(i) extensions with MySQL 5, and release the packages to testing later this week. Regards, Cory. -- Cory Omand From EBradley at williams-int.com Thu Feb 16 20:47:12 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:47:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Hello, I am using the stable repositories in pkg-get.conf and just tried to install rrdtool by using the following command: pkg-get -if rrdtool The install began well, but ended abruptly. I was alarmed because the error reported that the checksum's and expected size of the files did not match! Here is the exact error: . . . PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS pkgadd: ERROR: packaging file is corrupt file size <67> expected <50> actual file cksum <4244> expected <3155> actual Installation of failed (internal error). No changes were made to the system. ERROR: could not add CSWrrd. [139-eb1850 at sb100-10-/local/Software] . . . Could anyone shed some light on this for me? Thanks, Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From a.cervellin at acm.org Thu Feb 16 20:53:19 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:53:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <43F4D82F.5080901@acm.org> EBradley at williams-int.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am using the stable repositories in pkg-get.conf and just tried to > install rrdtool by using the following command: pkg-get -if rrdtool > The install began well, but ended abruptly. I was alarmed because the > error reported that the checksum's and expected size of the files did > not match! Here is the exact error: did you try to change mirror in pkg-get.conf ? From EBradley at williams-int.com Thu Feb 16 21:01:22 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:01:22 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBC6@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> I almost included this in my original message, but didn't think it really mattered. Yes, I have tried changing the mirror in pkg-get.conf; but only to the secondary mirror that is already listed. Thanks for the quick reply, Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alessio Cervellin Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:53 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool EBradley at williams-int.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am using the stable repositories in pkg-get.conf and just tried to > install rrdtool by using the following command: pkg-get -if rrdtool > The install began well, but ended abruptly. I was alarmed because the > error reported that the checksum's and expected size of the files did > not match! Here is the exact error: did you try to change mirror in pkg-get.conf ? _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From a.cervellin at acm.org Thu Feb 16 21:06:33 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:06:33 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBC6@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBC6@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <43F4DB49.3000705@acm.org> EBradley at williams-int.com wrote: > I almost included this in my original message, but didn't think it > really mattered. Yes, it matters because it could happen that during the synching process of the mirror servers, some packages could be transfered corrupted. The complete list of the mirrors is here: http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/mirrorStatus.jsp I'd try yet another mirror... (even if i don't really know why you are having that error) From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Feb 16 21:06:22 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:22 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBB8@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <20060216140622.00003c20@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:47:12 -0500 wrote: > is corrupt > > file size <67> expected <50> actual > > file cksum <4244> expected <3155> actual Sorry, no help here. I have a local repository that I update nightly with rsync and I have exactly the same error in stable. If you would, please enter a bug report. Also, request that SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency. Alex From EBradley at williams-int.com Thu Feb 16 21:24:55 2006 From: EBradley at williams-int.com (EBradley at williams-int.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:24:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool Message-ID: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBEA@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Okay, I've tried the stable portions of both the default and secondary sites listed in pkg-get.conf, the stable repo on http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw, and also the unstable repo on the default site in pkg-get.conf...all give the same error re: rrdtool's checksum being out of whack. I'll file a bug report against the package. Alex, why should SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency? (I'm not doubting you, I'd just like to have a reason to back up my request.) Evan D. Bradley IT Department Williams International Phone: (248) 624-5200 x 2112 Fax: (248) 960-2607 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alex Moore Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:06 PM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: Re: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:47:12 -0500 wrote: > is corrupt > > file size <67> expected <50> actual > > file cksum <4244> expected <3155> actual Sorry, no help here. I have a local repository that I update nightly with rsync and I have exactly the same error in stable. If you would, please enter a bug report. Also, request that SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency. Alex _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message. From james at blastwave.org Fri Feb 17 10:47:30 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:47:30 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool In-Reply-To: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBEA@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> References: <7AEE334EF0CB3E4B9730CD9A1C8CFFF40138CBEA@EXCHANGESRV.williams-int.com> Message-ID: <20060217.9473000.2765521724@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 16/02/06, 20:24:55, wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Error with: pkg-get -if rrdtool: > I'll file a bug report against the package. There is one: http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001432 (This shouldn't have been closed because the fix has not yet filtered through.) > Alex, why should SUNWcslx be removed as a dependency? (I'm not doubting > you, I'd just like to have a reason to back up my request.) It prevents the package being install where SUNWcslx does not exist, which is sun4m and more significantly Solaris 10. $ uname -a SunOS XXXX 5.10 Generic_118822-23 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine $ pkginfo SUNWcslx ERROR: information for "SUNWcslx" was not found $ uname -a SunOS XXXX 5.8 Generic_117350-25 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20 $ pkginfo SUNWcslx ERROR: information for "SUNWcslx" was not found But this machine is will work: $ uname -a SunOS XXXX 5.8 Generic_117350-28 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 $ pkginfo SUNWcslx system SUNWcslx Core Solaris Libraries (64-bit) http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001366 http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0001350 James. From chris.ridd at isode.com Tue Feb 21 11:20:16 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:20:16 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Desktop files for GNOME apps Message-ID: Do any X11 (especially GNOME) apps from Blastwave come with .desktop files? AFAIK these are used to automatically populate the Launch menu in JDS. I just installed firefox 1.5.0.1 from the testing directory, and didn't notice one :-( Cheers, Chris From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 22 20:56:26 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:56:26 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Pound 1.10 available in /testing Message-ID: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> Pound 1.10 is now available for testing in http://www.blastwave.org/testing It's the last version of the 1.x tree and contains bug fixes for the 1.9 version, no new features. The configuration file syntax is the same. In the above place you can also find Pound 2.0.2: it has many new features, a different configuration file syntax, but it is still considered "beta quality". Both have been configured with the following switches: --with-ssl=/opt/csw --enable-msdav --enable-super Note: actual blastwave's pound package (1.9) does not have msdav support, these new ones do. From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Wed Feb 22 21:57:34 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:57:34 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla 1.7.5 updates In-Reply-To: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> References: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> Message-ID: <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> Hi there, Has development for Mozilla on Solaris stopped at 1.7.5. I think the latest Windows release was 1.7.12. Was there a reason why - I would hate to be forced into using Thunderchicken and the SmolderingHamster ;) Cheers, S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Feb 22 22:05:27 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:05:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla 1.7.5 updates In-Reply-To: <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> References: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> Message-ID: <43FCD217.9000601@acm.org> LOEWENTHAL Simon wrote: > > Hi there, > > Has development for Mozilla on Solaris stopped at 1.7.5. I think the > latest Windows release was 1.7.12. Was there a reason why - I would > hate to be forced into using Thunderchicken and the SmolderingHamster ;) no it didn't stop, and 1.7.12 is not the latest one... indeed you can find Seamonkey 1.0 (aka Mozilla 1.8.0.1) on http://www.blastwave.org/testing and it should be soon released in the unstable blastwave tree too. From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Wed Feb 22 22:11:22 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:11:22 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla 1.7.5 updates In-Reply-To: <43FCD217.9000601@acm.org> References: <43FCC1EA.7020904@acm.org> <43FCD03E.400@gemini.edu> <43FCD217.9000601@acm.org> Message-ID: <43FCD37A.4070702@gemini.edu> Great - thanks for the update. Sea Monkey - Love it. Alessio Cervellin wrote: >LOEWENTHAL Simon wrote: > > >>Hi there, >> >>Has development for Mozilla on Solaris stopped at 1.7.5. I think the >>latest Windows release was 1.7.12. Was there a reason why - I would >>hate to be forced into using Thunderchicken and the SmolderingHamster ;) >> >> > >no it didn't stop, and 1.7.12 is not the latest one... indeed you can >find Seamonkey 1.0 (aka Mozilla 1.8.0.1) on >http://www.blastwave.org/testing and it should be soon released in the >unstable blastwave tree too. >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- // Nothing fancy and nothing Microsoft -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Feb 23 13:05:02 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:05:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Evince Message-ID: <43FDA4EE.5030802@ericsson.com> I did try to install the Evince pkg from the unstable area but got the following: ... ERROR: no info for CSWpoppler. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWevince /MOL From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Thu Feb 23 13:31:44 2006 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (alessio) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:31:44 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] Evince Message-ID: <26337733.1140697904629.JavaMail.root@pswm18.cp.tin.it> I would say there's a problem with the catalog file. You could manually install the missing poppler package by downloading it here: http: //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/ and then try again pkg- get -i evince ----Original Message---- From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com Date: Feb 23, 2006 1:05 PM To: "questions and discussions" Subj: [csw-users] Evince I did try to install the Evince pkg from the unstable area but got the following: ... ERROR: no info for CSWpoppler. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWevince /MOL _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From james at blastwave.org Thu Feb 23 13:34:47 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:34:47 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Evince In-Reply-To: <43FDA4EE.5030802@ericsson.com> References: <43FDA4EE.5030802@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060223.12344700.2535656561@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 23/02/06, 12:05:02, Mats Larsson wrote regarding [csw-users] Evince: > I did try to install the Evince pkg from the unstable area but got the > following: > ... > ERROR: no info for CSWpoppler. Cannot install dependancy. > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWevince Yes, that is so. It's a brand new release and the corresponding CSWpoppler package has not yet been released. Please just ignore CSWevince now. If you want to can get poppler from www.blastwave.org/testing/ but with all things testing you are on your own - I heard there was good reason not to release it but I don't know what. This will be fixed but maybe in the short term by just removing CSWevince from the archive. Sorry any inconvenience. James. From chris.ridd at isode.com Thu Feb 23 19:14:28 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:14:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Desktop files for GNOME apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 21/2/06 10:20, Chris Ridd wrote: > Do any X11 (especially GNOME) apps from Blastwave come with .desktop files? > AFAIK these are used to automatically populate the Launch menu in JDS. > > I just installed firefox 1.5.0.1 from the testing directory, and didn't > notice one :-( Nobody? OK, I added a bug to request this. Cheers, Chris From aw-confirm at ebay.com Fri Feb 24 16:19:20 2006 From: aw-confirm at ebay.com (aw-confirm at ebay.com) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:49:20 +0530 Subject: [csw-users] Question from eBay Member Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Feb 24 23:13:57 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] scotty 3.0.0 now available in testing Message-ID: <43FF8525.1020301@acm.org> A new pkg is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing : scotty-3.0.0,REV=2006.02.24-SunOS5.8-* The package contains both "Tnm" and "Tkined". "Scotty is the name of a software package which allows to implement site specific network management software using high-level, string-based APIs. The software is based on the Tool Command Language which simplifies the development of portable network management scripts. The scotty source distribution includes two major components. The first one is the Tnm Tcl Extension which provides access to network management information sources. The second component is the Tkined network editor which provides a framework for an extensible network management system." http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/scotty/ Dependencies are: CSWtcl CSWtk From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Feb 24 23:34:17 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:34:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] xterm 209 available in testing Message-ID: <43FF89E9.5000505@acm.org> xterm 209 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing Dependencies: P CSWfconfig P CSWftype2 P CSWlibxft2 P CSWlibxrender P CSWzlib Changelog: Patch #209 - 2006/2/12 - XFree86 4.5.99.22 * remove setf and setb from xterm-256color terminfo entry to avoid issues with applications that ignore the ANSI strings (report by Emanuele Giaquinta). * remove obsolete references to "Xorg" to avoid confusion with "X.org" (prompted by David Dawes commit message for XFree86). * improve initial layout performance for the toolbar configuration by precalculating the height of the toolbar. * remove menu entry for "Enable Curses Emulation" (to make room for "Select To Clipboard). * add resource selectToClipboard, action set-select and a menu entry to allow users to switch between PRIMARY and CLIPBOARD for select/paste. * allow cursor to have the same color as foreground (text), since it is rendered as reverse (Debian #350664). * amend change for loading utf8Fonts resource from patch #204 to allow an ISO-8859-1 "normal" font to be combined with an ISO-10646 font if the latter is given via the -fw option or its corresponding resource value. * add TIOCSCTTY ioctl() ifdef'd for __GNU__ to set the controlling terminal (Debian #348457). * add configure option --disable-leaks. * add a check in Bell to ensure that the VT100 widget is realized, since it may be called by xtermLoadFont given an incorrect font resource (Redhat #180450). * improve initialization of wide-bold font by not using the derived value when it happens to have few glyphs (report by Mboso Sampson). * improve dynamic colors by not repainting the screen if only the cursor color changes (request by Bram Moolenaar). * fix menu initialization for tek4014 window broken in patch #206. * typo in manpage (Debian #351425). * correct loop logic in dotext to prevent an infinite loop if a wide character was just at the right margin when wrapping was disabled (report by Serge van den Boom). * initialize the saved-cursor data so a restore-cursor operation without a preceding save-cursor operation will not modify the foreground color. * add a new selection feature: regular expressions, and new resources which specify what happens on multiple mouse clicks: on2Clicks, on3Clicks, on4Clicks and on5Clicks. * revert the XTerm.ad change from patch #208 (Debian #348384). * fixes for the print-window to make it handle combining characters in UTF-8 mode. * add check to ensure that double-clicking to extend selection will not extend it into the scrollback area. This still allows users to scroll back and select text (Debian #347415). * add configure option --with-tty-group to help work around deficiencies in packager's build environment (Debian #349142). * fix typo in configure script option --disable-narrowproto (report by David Mart?nez Moreno). * amend CF_X_FREETYPE changes for pkg-config check to ensure that Xft is known to that tool (report and patch by Emanuele Giaquinta). * add an ifdef to allow ./configure --disable-active-icon to work, broken by new code for testing memory leaks in patch #208 (report by Brian Lindholm). Patch #208 - 2006/1/3 - XFree86 4.5.99.19 * add charClass resource to XTerm.ad and UXTerm.ad which simplifies selecting URLs (prompted by Kirill Ponomarew). * modify install rule for uxterm to account for the --program-prefix, etc., options by invoking the transformed name of xterm rather than simply "xterm". * modify configure --with-app-defaults option to allow --without-app-defaults. * add configure --with-symlink option to make it simpler to install successive versions of xterm renamed using the --program-prefix, etc., options with a symbolic link pointing to the most recent. * make -iconic option work with toolbar configuration (GenToo #113604). * suppress lastlog feature for 64-bit Solaris configuration since that platform provides only a 32-bit interface (report by Peter Bray). * fix memory reallocation for the "UTF-8" menu entry when xterm is started using the +u8 option (reported by Jan Willem Stumpel). * add a configure check for the actual path of luit, to work around broken imake configurations. * add a configure check for pkg-config (Redhat Bugzilla #173541). * modify install-rule for uxterm to omit executable suffix, e.g., for Cygwin. * modify sinstall.sh to work around quirks in Cygwin configuration. From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Feb 26 00:21:28 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:21:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] stunnel 4.14 now availabe in testing Message-ID: <4400E678.3020105@acm.org> stunnel 4.14 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing warning: this pkg is actually totally untested (i miss a solaris machine...) "Stunnel is a program that allows you to encrypt arbitrary TCP connections inside SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) available on both Unix and Windows. Stunnel can allow you to secure non-SSL aware daemons and protocols (like POP, IMAP, LDAP, etc) by having Stunnel provide the encryption, requiring no changes to the daemon's code." http://www.stunnel.org/ Dependencies: P CSWossl P CSWzlib From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Feb 26 00:24:30 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:24:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ipaudit 1.0 now available in testing Message-ID: <4400E72E.8000500@acm.org> ipaudit 1.0 beta2 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing warning: this pkg is actually totally untested (i miss a solaris machine...) "IPAudit monitors network activity on a network by host, protocol and port. IPAudit listens to a network device in promiscuous mode, and records every connection between two ip addresses. A unique connection is determined by the ip addresses of the two machines, the protocol used between them, and the port numbers (if they are communicating via udp or tcp)." http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net/ Dependencies: P CSWlibpcap From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 14:36:00 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:36:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get Message-ID: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> Hello. I ordered our sysadmins to install pkg-get on four of our systems, and we ran into an odd problem. On three of our four (supposedly identical) systems pkg-get does not find its config file when started as root, but does find it when started as a non root user. What happens when root runs pkg-get -U is that it complains that there is no config file present. (even though on is). pkg-get then creates a (default) config file in /etc. Looking at the script it seems to do this by catting a "here" document. This default config does not work, as anonymous ftp is aparently not possible to the mirror that is configured in it. The only way we managed to make it work was by copying our config file in /opt/csw/etc to /etc. What I found out after a few tests is that on these three systems pkg-get symple doesn't "see" the config file in /opt/csw/etc when started as root, but that it does see this file when started as a non root user. This strikes me as quite odd... What could the reason be? Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 15:29:53 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:29:53 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > Hello. > Perhaps try to find the offending files first. I don't know how large these systems are but perhaps you can run a find /etc -type f -name pkg-get.conf and find /opt -type f -name pkg-get.conf Then remove every file you find. Then create a file /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf with the following contents : url=http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable # To disable use of gpg or md5, uncomment these #use_gpg=false #use_md5=false Then cd /var/pkg-get rm cat* des* Then try the following .. just to test connection : /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -s http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable -a Let's see what you get from that. It sounds like you have a pkg-get.conf file sitting somewhere on these identical systems. Somewhere other than /opt/csw/etc Dennis From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 15:59:03 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:59:03 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: <6ed6382b0602280536g46601776n262c3cb75c7a8e29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Perhaps try to find the offending files first. > > I don't know how large these systems are but perhaps you can run a > > find /etc -type f -name pkg-get.conf > > and > > find /opt -type f -name pkg-get.conf > > > Then remove every file you find. > > Then create a file /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf with the following contents : > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. The problem is that this file was completely ignored. pkg-get upon first execution complained that _no_ config file was present, and went on to create its own in /etc. The thing that has us scratching our heads is that this only happens when _root_ executes pkg-get. When you execute pkg-get as a normal user it does seem to find the config file we created, as witnessed by the fact that it contacts the mirror we configured. But then ofcourse the installation of the packages downloaded fails... I did a further test where I copied /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf to etc, and changed the mirror in it. I then dit a pkg-get -U, both as root, and as a normal user. By looking at which mirrors were contacted I could see which config file was read. I saw that when pkg-get is executed as root it reads the config file in /etc, and when executed as a normal user it read the config file from /opt/csw/etc. The second thing that has us scratching our head is that this only happens on three of four (asumed) identical systems. All with solaris 8 Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From chris.ridd at isode.com Tue Feb 28 16:04:38 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:04:38 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >> >> Perhaps try to find the offending files first. >> >> I don't know how large these systems are but perhaps you can run a >> >> find /etc -type f -name pkg-get.conf >> >> and >> >> find /opt -type f -name pkg-get.conf >> >> >> Then remove every file you find. >> >> Then create a file /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf with the following contents : >> > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. > > The problem is that this file was completely ignored. pkg-get upon > first execution complained that _no_ config file was present, and went > on to create its own in /etc. > > The thing that has us scratching our heads is that this only happens > when _root_ executes pkg-get. When you execute pkg-get as a normal > user it does seem to find the config file we created, as witnessed by > the fact that it contacts the mirror we configured. But then ofcourse > the installation of the packages downloaded fails... This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on what's actually happening? Cheers, Chris From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 16:10:37 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:10:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. I'll assume /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf which you did not need to create .. because it gets created for you when you install CSWpkg_get let's go back through this step by step and fix this situation okay ? First .. run the fol : pkginfo | grep CSW and then show me what you get > > This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on > what's actually happening? forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time Dennis From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 16:32:50 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:32:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6ed6382b0602280732p39eff737vb6fc2d1537bc35e5@mail.gmail.com> On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > > On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > > > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. > > I'll assume /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf > > which you did not need to create .. because it gets created for you > when you install CSWpkg_get > > let's go back through this step by step and fix this situation okay ? > > First .. run the fol : > > pkginfo | grep CSW > > and then show me what you get Can't do that anymore as a) our sysadmins have gone home and I don't have root on production systems and b) it would give us a whole list of installed CSW packages, as we went on to install quite a bit after copying the config to etc. What we told the sysadmins to do was literally the following: 1) pkgadd -d pkg_get.pkg 2) vi /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf (to change the mirror url to url=http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/csw/stable) 3) /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U This worked fine on the first server, but on the other three pkg-get -U first complained about a missing config file... The file was most definitely not missing. All I can do now is post-mortems. I can not go back an do it all over again. I am just left with the mistery... Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From chris.ridd at isode.com Tue Feb 28 16:42:45 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:42:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 28/2/06 3:10, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: >> This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on >> what's actually happening? > > forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time OK :-) Cheers, Chris From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 16:50:47 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:50:47 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0602280732p39eff737vb6fc2d1537bc35e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0602280659v6e616cdeg1cd9836bd1abe32e@mail.gmail.com> <6ed6382b0602280732p39eff737vb6fc2d1537bc35e5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > > > On 28/2/06 2:59, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > On 2/28/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > >> On 2/28/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > > > > > > > > We more or less did that. We installed pkg-get on a system that never > > > > had it. We created a /opt/cs/etc/pkg-get.conf file. > > > > I'll assume /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf > > > > which you did not need to create .. because it gets created for you > > when you install CSWpkg_get > > > > let's go back through this step by step and fix this situation okay ? > > > > First .. run the fol : > > > > pkginfo | grep CSW > > > > and then show me what you get > > Can't do that anymore as a) our sysadmins have gone home and I don't > have root on production systems and b) it would give us a whole list > of installed CSW packages, as we went on to install quite a bit after > copying the config to etc. > > What we told the sysadmins to do was literally the following: > > 1) pkgadd -d pkg_get.pkg > 2) vi /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf > (to change the mirror url to url=http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/csw/stable) > 3) /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U > > This worked fine on the first server, but on the other three pkg-get > -U first complained about a missing config file... The file was most > definitely not missing. > > All I can do now is post-mortems. I can not go back an do it all over > again. I am just left with the mistery... > The pkg-get tool is amazingly simple. Perhaps I need to rewrite the HOWTO again at www.blastwave.org/howto.html Dennis From vaillant at ganil.fr Tue Feb 28 18:31:15 2006 From: vaillant at ganil.fr (Vaillant Daniel) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:31:15 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] y y y y y "toot much" yes or ??? Message-ID: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> hhello, when I do pkg-get upgrade, I have to acquit changes by "recurrent" yes I hoped that with the newly re-found egalization on fullauto-admin to admin in /var/pkg-get this would be a souvenir. Except errors on my side: the answer is NO. How do you do an upgrade with no check, with the option: change all whatever Thank you. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- sy VAILLANT Daniel mailto:vaillant at ganil.fr re GANIL GIP (Syst&Res) Vox:(+33)(0)2 31 45 46 84 mi B.P. 5027 Fax:(+33)(0)2 31 45 46 65 @ 14076 CAEN-Cedex 5 Web: http://www.ganil.fr ........................................................................ Le temps s'?coule, l'espace se dilate, l'?nergie se mat?rialise et tout le reste est commentaire. Miche Cass? Du vide et de la cr?ation From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Feb 28 19:04:10 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:04:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] y y y y y "toot much" yes or ??? In-Reply-To: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> References: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> Message-ID: On 2/28/06, Vaillant Daniel wrote: > hhello, > > /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get --U -u -f better read the manpage to pkg-get first Dennis