[csw-users] n00bness kicking in

[Tim Smith]

bash-3.00$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

bash-3.00$


should I worry?


Mats Larsson wrote:

>On 2006-09-12 16:56, EBradley at williams-int.com wrote:
>  
>
>>Really?  Hmm...I've used the firefox from that site since 1.0 on both
>>Sol 9 and 10 on several types of Sun hardware without incident.
>>    
>>
>
>Same here. Always work as expected. Sure you haven't messed up your 
>LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
>
>/MOL
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org
>>[mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
>>Behalf Of Tim Smith
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:48 AM
>>To: questions and discussions
>>Subject: Re: [csw-users] n00bness kicking in
>>
>>Tried that version and it didnt work :-(
>>
>>Segfaults for me every time (tbird too).
>>
>>
>>EBradley at williams-int.com wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Not to discourage someone using pkg-get, but firefox is available via 
>>>the web for the Solaris platform.
>>>
>>>http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.6.html#othersystems
>>>
>>>And then it's aaallllll the way down at the bottom of the page in 
>>>either a tarball or pkgadd format.  The tarball is what I've always
>>>      
>>>
>>done.
>>    
>>
>>>Untar it, cd into the directory, and your binary is right there.
>>>
>>>:)
>>>
>>>Evan D. Bradley
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org
>>>[mailto:users-bounces+ebradley=williams-int.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
>>>      
>>>
>>>Behalf Of Tim Smith
>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:32 AM
>>>To: questions and discussions
>>>Subject: [csw-users] n00bness kicking in
>>>
>>>Ok, I'm trying to upgrade firefox from the ancient 1.0.6 ive been stuck
>>>      
>>>
>>>with to the new shiny 1.5.whatever that I just noticed is availible.
>>>
>>>The problem is, it has a lot of deps that need updating.
>>>
>>>Right now, I'm manually re-running pkg-get -i firefox, waiting for it 
>>>to DL 20 megs, then waiting to see which package dep needs updating, 
>>>then repeating the process down the chain for each package ....
>>>
>>>running pkg-get -h doesnt seem to provide a better way.
>>>
>>>Is there a quicker way I can give pkg-get an argument to "update 
>>>dependancies as needed but dont update everything on my system", as I 
>>>do
>>>-NOT- want to invoke a qt/kde update by accident...
>>>
>>>does that question make sense?
>>>
>>>--
>>>Timothy Smith
>>>IT Administrator
>>>Degree Controls, INC
>>>
>>>Please do not email me microsoft word documents, read here to learn
>>>      
>>>
>>why:
>>    
>>
>>>http://www.nothingisreal.com/dfki/no-word
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>users mailing list
>>>users at lists.blastwave.org
>>>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the
>>>      
>>>
>>intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential
>>information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from
>>disclosure.
>>    
>>
>>>Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
>>>      
>>>
>>If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by
>>reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the
>>message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message.
>>    
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>users mailing list
>>>users at lists.blastwave.org
>>>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>--
>>Timothy Smith
>>IT Administrator
>>Degree Controls, INC
>>
>>Please do not email me microsoft word documents, read here to learn why:
>>http://www.nothingisreal.com/dfki/no-word
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>users mailing list
>>users at lists.blastwave.org
>>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.
>>
>>Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message.
>>_______________________________________________
>>users mailing list
>>users at lists.blastwave.org
>>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>  
>

-- 
Timothy Smith
IT Administrator
Degree Controls, INC

Please do not email me microsoft word documents, read here to learn why:
http://www.nothingisreal.com/dfki/no-word