From pfelecan at blastwave.org Mon Apr 2 09:34:50 2007 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:34:50 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Emacs 22 snapshot 20070401 CVS Message-ID: The monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, is in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.96,REV=cvs20070401-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.96,REV=cvs20070401-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package the next month. Enjoy -- Peter From william at wbonnet.net Tue Apr 3 01:36:51 2007 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:36:51 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.0.2 is available Message-ID: <46119393.7010200@wbonnet.net> Hi all dbus is available from testing. this is the first set of packages of the coming Xfce 4.4 There are three different packages : dbus, containing executables libdbus, containing dynamic libs libdbus_devel, containing development headers files are : dbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz dbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus_devel-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus_devel-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If no problem is reported, these packages will be submited at the end of the stabilization. Regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From odenbach at uni-paderborn.de Tue Apr 3 15:53:28 2007 From: odenbach at uni-paderborn.de (Christopher Odenbach) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:53:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] pkg-get v2 makecontents file In-Reply-To: <55038.87.74.24.183.1175112739.squirrel@87.74.24.183> References: <55038.87.74.24.183.1175112739.squirrel@87.74.24.183> Message-ID: <200704031553.35031.odenbach@uni-paderborn.de> Hi, > Does anyone have a new makecontents script for creating pkg-get > repositories? The one at > http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/makecontents is for version 1 and > doesn't create the descriptions file. The script attached does a lot more (it creates a mix of different repositories, we use it to add our local packages to our blastwave mirror), but you should get the idea. I hope you get around with the German comments in it. If not, just ask. Christopher -- ====================================================== Dipl.-Ing. Christopher Odenbach Zentrum fuer Informations- und Medientechnologien Universitaet Paderborn Raum N5.110 odenbach at uni-paderborn.de Tel.: +49 5251 60 5315 ====================================================== -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: update_collections Type: application/x-perl Size: 7278 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070403/f97a2b1a/attachment.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070403/f97a2b1a/attachment-0001.bin From maseda at unc.edu Wed Apr 4 17:35:03 2007 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:35:03 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Alternatives to LD_LIBRARY_PATH In-Reply-To: <20070131.9414100.4090405955@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <6d6f8480701300937v643f9e53kf3f64554eee4829b@mail.gmail.com> <20070130171316.00000a40@sws602.mcsun.local> <6d6f8480701302138r5047dad6w8be2239b92777066@mail.gmail.com> <20070131.9414100.4090405955@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <4613C5A7.3080804@unc.edu> Hi All, I am compiling (with CSW gcc3) some of my own (non-CSW) software into /opt/pkg, and am looking for an alternative to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The following page recommends LD_RUN_PATH and LDFLAGS: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=55641 But, I am not sure if the aforementioned variables are the best approach. Also, will CSW gcc3 respect these variables? I have heard that SFW gcc3 has a bug regarding that: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=7201 Please advise. Thx, Mike James Lee wrote: > On 31/01/07, 05:38:03, Louwtjie Burger wrote > regarding Re: [csw-users] Mysql 64bit: > > >> The link you supplied points to the "unstable version"... >> > > In fact the link points to the unstable *Sparc* version. Both > unstable and stable Sparc packages have 64bit support. > > > >> Here is my install (pkg-get -i mysql5) from the "stable" tree. >> > > >> [burgerw at pc:~]find /opt/csw/|grep mysqld >> find: cannot read dir /opt/csw/etc/sasldb2: Permission denied >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqldump >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqld_multi >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqld_safe >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqldumpslow >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqldump.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqld.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqld_multi.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqld_safe.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/i386/mysqld >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/pentium/mysqld >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/mysqld >> find: cannot read dir /opt/csw/mysql5/var: Permission denied >> [burgerw at pc:~]file /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/i386/mysqld >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/i386/mysqld: ELF 32-bit LSB executable >> 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped >> [burgerw at pc:~] >> > > > There, we can see you are using the Intel version. > > AMD64 support from Blastwave is coming but we need supporting libraries > built before the larger projects like mysql can be built for AMD64. > Mysql uses openssl and we are waiting for that to be updated. > > > > > James. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Apr 5 15:20:41 2007 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:20:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem In-Reply-To: <1119d34ab0e.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <1119d34ab0e.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <4614F7A9.5070301@ericsson.com> Great, now it works. On 2007-03-29 12:19, Alessio Cervellin wrote: > It should be fixed now, try again please. > > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: mats.larsson at ericsson.com > Data: 26-mar-2007 14.06 > A: "questions and > discussions" > Ogg: Re: [csw-users] wireshark > pkg problem > > On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote: >> No matter how > many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get >> the > following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it: >> # (From site http: > //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) >> > software localrev remoterev >> wireshark 0.99.5 0.99.5, > rev=20946 >> Anyone else seeing this? > > Nobody? From maseda at unc.edu Mon Apr 9 16:52:08 2007 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:52:08 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] CSWapache2 In-Reply-To: <4613C5A7.3080804@unc.edu> References: <6d6f8480701300937v643f9e53kf3f64554eee4829b@mail.gmail.com> <20070130171316.00000a40@sws602.mcsun.local> <6d6f8480701302138r5047dad6w8be2239b92777066@mail.gmail.com> <20070131.9414100.4090405955@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <4613C5A7.3080804@unc.edu> Message-ID: <461A5318.7000407@unc.edu> Hi Cory, I cannot seem to get SSL working with CSWapache2 (2.2.0)... I have basically ported my CSWapache (1.3.34) config files over, and now SSL doesn't seem to work... Any thoughts? Mike From selundgr at uncc.edu Tue Apr 10 17:11:10 2007 From: selundgr at uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:11:10 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] CSWapache2 In-Reply-To: <461A5318.7000407@unc.edu> Message-ID: You'll need to migrate your configuration files. It's not a radical change from the 1.3 format to 2.2 but there are tweaks to be done. Looking in your error.log for apache to be complaining about what's wrong. You may want to also review: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/upgrading.html (from 1.3 to 2.0) http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/upgrading.html (from 2.0 to 2.2) Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services http://www.uncc.edu On 4/9/07 10:52 AM, "Mike Seda" wrote: > Hi Cory, > I cannot seem to get SSL working with CSWapache2 (2.2.0)... I have > basically ported my CSWapache (1.3.34) config files over, and now SSL > doesn't seem to work... Any thoughts? > Mike > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 20:07:33 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:07:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > The 2007-04 stable package collection has been finalised and will > reach mirror sites soon. Do not update your system yet, this is > prior notice. > > If you use postgresql you will have to do a dump before update > and a restore after. For more information see this message: > http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2007-March/005021.html > > > The final release will be announced shortly. expect a homepage update shortly. Dennis From zizban at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 20:10:58 2007 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:10:58 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? On 4/10/07, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > The 2007-04 stable package collection has been finalised and will > > reach mirror sites soon. Do not update your system yet, this is > > prior notice. > > > > If you use postgresql you will have to do a dump before update > > and a restore after. For more information see this message: > > http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2007-March/005021.html > > > > > > The final release will be announced shortly. > > > expect a homepage update shortly. > > Dennis > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070410/a25dcb3c/attachment.html From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 20:22:51 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:22:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less Dennis From james at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 20:31:20 2007 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:31:20 GMT Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <20070410.18312000.3109488906@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 10/04/07, 19:22:51, Dennis Clarke wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04: > > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? > gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less Less actually, gnome is a sub package and the others are used elsewhere. Regrettably, gnome didn't meet the requirements for stable, hence there is no gnome desktop in stable. gnome from unstable works mostly, if a few corners were tidied it would be accepted for stable. James. From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Tue Apr 10 20:42:12 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less Dennis --------------------------- Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being pushed to the public mirrors. The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern GNOME desktop for corporate and educational institutions. Please test Evince and XPDF with all your PDF and postscript printing and viewing needs. Also, GIMP 2.3.15, EoG, and Gthumb for any picture viewing and editing needs. ~ Ken Mays ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 20:54:52 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:54:52 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance to community supported package repositories. Message-ID: <5b5090780704101154t428b6989rfb536cad1ec60021@mail.gmail.com> For a number of reasons, I feel it is the right path for us to move to get rid off /opt/sfw and move to /opt/csw. I also think that because blastwave is so comprehensive that we can almost entirely get out of having to compile and build our own packages. I am running into resistance to moving to a community supported package system/repository. (It's been ok'ed for use within our group, but not for rollout to the majority of our servers that host other groups applications.) I am wondering if anyone one has run into this, and how you dealt with it? Thanks, Brian From zizban at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 21:00:00 2007 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:00:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On 4/10/07, ken mays wrote: > > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? > > gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less > > Dennis > --------------------------- > > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. > > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. > > Please test Evince and XPDF with all your PDF and > postscript printing and viewing needs. Also, GIMP > 2.3.15, EoG, and Gthumb for any picture viewing and > editing needs. > > ~ Ken Mays Maybe I need to try gnome again becaue last I tried, a week or two ago, Nautilus would crash every time I tried to move a file or move something to the trash. ____________________________________________________________________________ > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. > http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 21:04:58 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1362.72.39.216.186.1176231898.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> >> What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? > > gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less > > Dennis > --------------------------- > > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. I have a pile of software here to push around for testing and things have not gone quickly. Too many distractions with matters that don't help productivity. I'll ignore everything ( or try ) and get this done. > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. With nice artwork and splash screens too :-) > Please test Evince and XPDF with all your PDF and > postscript printing and viewing needs. Also, GIMP > 2.3.15, EoG, and Gthumb for any picture viewing and > editing needs. I use GIMP all the time. Literally. I'll get onto that also. Dennis From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 21:22:15 2007 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:22:15 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? Message-ID: > For a number of reasons, I feel it is the right path for us to move to > get rid off /opt/sfw and move to /opt/csw. I also think that because > blastwave is so comprehensive that we can almost entirely get out of > having to compile and build our own packages. > > I am running into resistance to moving to a community supported > package system/repository. (It's been ok'ed for use within our group, > but not for rollout to the majority of our servers that host other > groups applications.) > > I am wondering if anyone one has run into this, and how you dealt with it? You could also post this sort of thing on the OpenSolaris discuss list and see what feedback you get. I want you to know that we have fairly decent Solaris 10 build servers that sit idle also. We also have a Niagara T2000 server and a decent Opteron server or two for people to participate with. Free to use provided you conform to standards. I do note that the Companion CD people ( at Sun ) released five or six packages today. At the risk of being shallow I think that the Blastwave project will release 1,544 packages via the stable release today. Of those there are 583 updates since the 1st of January. The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not trust the logn term existence of a community project. Since October of 2002 I think we have had less than five days of downtime due to server rooms moves, bandwidth changes and power outages. Most corporations can not report that sort of stability. Dennis Clarke ps: and Debian Linux is a "community" project also. Ten years + ? From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 21:26:31 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] Resistance to community supported package repositories. In-Reply-To: <5b5090780704101154t428b6989rfb536cad1ec60021@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b5090780704101154t428b6989rfb536cad1ec60021@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1396.72.39.216.186.1176233191.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > For a number of reasons, I feel it is the right path for us to move to > get rid off /opt/sfw and move to /opt/csw. I also think that because > blastwave is so comprehensive that we can almost entirely get out of > having to compile and build our own packages. > > I am running into resistance to moving to a community supported > package system/repository. (It's been ok'ed for use within our group, > but not for rollout to the majority of our servers that host other > groups applications.) > > I am wondering if anyone one has run into this, and how you dealt with it? You could also post this sort of thing on the OpenSolaris discuss list and see what feedback you get. I want you to know that we have fairly decent Solaris 10 build servers that sit idle also. We also have a Niagara T2000 server and a decent Opteron server or two for people to participate with. Free to use provided you conform to standards. I do note that the Companion CD people ( at Sun ) released five or six packages today. At the risk of being shallow I think that the Blastwave project will release 1,544 packages via the stable release today. Of those there are 583 updates since the 1st of January. The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not trust the logn term existence of a community project. Since October of 2002 I think we have had less than five days of downtime due to server rooms moves, bandwidth changes and power outages. Most corporations can not report that sort of stability. Dennis Clarke ps: and Debian Linux is a "community" project also. Ten years + ? From listen at alexander.skwar.name Wed Apr 11 12:23:46 2007 From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:23:46 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? References: Message-ID: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Dennis Clarke wrote: > The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not > trust the logn term existence of a community project. You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company and then stops the production of a certain program? IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, Debian, ... (Yes, I know that you, Dennis, did not mean it that way.) Alexander Skwar From listen at alexander.skwar.name Wed Apr 11 12:25:27 2007 From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:25:27 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> ken mays wrote: > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. > > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Alexander Skwar From ihsan at blastwave.org Wed Apr 11 13:49:30 2007 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:49:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? In-Reply-To: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <461CCB4A.5030701@blastwave.org> Hello Alexander, Am 11.4.2007 12:23 Uhr, Alexander Skwar schrieb: >> The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not >> trust the logn term existence of a community project. > > You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence > of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think > that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company > and then stops the production of a certain program? Well, I hear that very often from people, who never worked in a professional environment, where it really matters if your system is running or not. > IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially > if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, > Debian, ... We are doing our best too provide you the best quality. But you shouldn't forget, that all people at Blastwave are doing this in their free time and no one is getting payed for that, what he is doing. That means, that we do not provide 24h support with SLA if something doesn't work. This is something what you can get from commercial software, but not from OSS projects. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ http://gallery.dogan.ch/ http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Wed Apr 11 14:21:30 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <944612.3999.qm@web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> ken mays wrote: > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. > > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Alexander Skwar --------------------- Alex, Well... good question there! I've actually started on GNOME 2.18.x packaging. GNOME 2.16.3 review is done so I wanted to push that out first. ;o> ~ Ken ____________________________________________________________________________________ Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367 From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 11 15:12:56 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? In-Reply-To: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <61185.70.50.142.84.1176297176.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not >> trust the logn term existence of a community project. > > You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence > of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think > that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company > and then stops the production of a certain program? Well, if I apply that line of thinking along with the multiple interjected little question marks then the answer is no. You cannot trust anything. The sun will burn out in a few billion years. Long before that we can expect another ice age. Possibly bad weather. Also, I will be dead. So will everyone that you know and all these corporations will be less than a historical footnote. So .. over and period of time you can depend on nothing and no one. There .. having said that you really have a hard time debating the existence of this community project as well as the software released. It exists today, yesterday and probably for quite some time now. So if you want to hand roll your own because you can not depend on any given vendor then thats fine. Just know that you may be totally right and wrong at the same time. > IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially > if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, > Debian, ... > > (Yes, I know that you, Dennis, did not mean it that way.) I think I was trying to simply say that we are here. For any given short sample of time you will see the project exists. If that sample window gets too large then you will see that nothing exists. I think that maybe the limit of the average mass of the universe as time approaches infinity will be zero. nothing exists ? how ever will I send this email ? :-) Dennis From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 11 15:17:49 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:17:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <61190.70.50.142.84.1176297469.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > ken mays wrote: > >> Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME >> 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully >> have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being >> pushed to the public mirrors. >> >> The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern >> GNOME desktop for corporate and educational >> institutions. > > Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the > focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Well, over any given length of time there is no such thing as "modern". Let's just say that "current" would be real nice. I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it released. Half of my problems with testing is that I am using Solaris 8 to test with and the machines are slow and old. A single cycle of "install GNOME" and then test and then pkgrm takes hours and hours. Dennis From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Wed Apr 11 16:31:16 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <61190.70.50.142.84.1176297469.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <845624.88777.qm@web33612.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > ken mays wrote: > >> Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME >> 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully >> have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being >> pushed to the public mirrors. >> >> The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern >> GNOME desktop for corporate and educational >> institutions. > > Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the > focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Well, over any given length of time there is no such thing as "modern". Let's just say that "current" would be real nice. I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it released. Half of my problems with testing is that I am using Solaris 8 to test with and the machines are slow and old. A single cycle of "install GNOME" and then test and then pkgrm takes hours and hours. Dennis -------------------------------- GNOME 2.18.0 depends on components not available for Sun Solaris 8 at this time. Due to Sun's EOL/EOS status of Solaris 8, it is NOT in **my** best interest to port GNOME 2.18.x to Solaris 8. I've tagged GNOME 2.18.x for Solaris 10/11 for now. GNOME 2.16.x is the both modern and 'recently' current. You don't have GNOME 2.16.x on hardly *ANY* of the commercial UNIX-certified OS releases. Something to think about when you get a modern desktop environment nowadays with free support. I've started pushing up the updated GNOME packages for unstable release. Please test and review for feedback.. ~ Ken Mays ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Apr 11 16:37:56 2007 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: 11 Apr 2007 14:37:56 -0000 Subject: [csw-users] KNotify Message-ID: <23320-19629@sneakemail.com> I think I've turned something on that causes a "Notification - KNotify" dialog to pop up saying "unminimize" every time I open a minimimized application window. It's rather annoying, but I can't figure out how to turn it off? Anyone using KDE have a suggestion? FYI, I am using KDE from blastwave on Solaris 10 (sparc). Thank you From brian.gupta at gmail.com Wed Apr 11 22:57:49 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:57:49 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? In-Reply-To: <61185.70.50.142.84.1176297176.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <61185.70.50.142.84.1176297176.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <5b5090780704111357y70a6a966x68960b5955c77ddf@mail.gmail.com> I have tried to summarize the pros and cons, as I see them. In addition I have added responses towhat I believe are perceived cons. I am starting to make some progress, with my colleagues. I just now need to come up with a workable stable deployment plan within the next few months. For inclusion in our next refresh of our jumpstart build after 04/07. I am thinking we might need to keep a local replica of the repository with point in time snapshots of older trees. But I digress, I will start up another thread to discuss deployment methodologies.) Here is an expanded list of pros/cons for your review and response. (If you think it makes sense to incorporate some of all of this into some knowledge base, feel free). I believe the following are pros: 1) All Blastwave packages track dependencies and will install them automatically (Unless you keep the default configuration to ask first.) 2) Blastwave is completely independent, in that there are no dependencies on libraries or packages that lie outside of the /opt/csw tree. 3) Updates are released quarterly http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/announce/2007-January/000042.html (They rebuild and test the tree, once a quarter, to release the quarterly stable builds) 4) Blastwave.org sends out email updates if a critical security bug is found. They also immediately generate a new package and add it to the stable tree. Sun does not provide this critical service for /opt/sfw packages. 5) Saves time when installing finicky packages that weren't originally built with Solaris in mind. (IE: Getting Linux only packages that rely on Linux libraries to build, etc) 6) Dedicated team where each member is responsible for maintaining certain packages, so they get very familiar with said packages. 7) 1500+ prebuilt packages in the repository. 8) Currently only one person in our group has the knowledge to build and maintain System V packages. If we went to /opt/csw this would no longer be an issue. 9) Built with the latest Sun compiler, unless the package needs gcc. 10) Very simple to list all the packages, list installed packages, update installed packages, and remove packages. 11) Packages are much more recent than /opt/sfw/ 12) Blastwave has been releasing packages since Solaris 8. (Over 5 years) 13) The Sun /opt/sfw distribution is a VERY limited in the number of packages. 14) In the rare event that we need to compile our own package, if it is built in such a way that it conforms to the Blastwave.org's standards, we will have no conflicts, and could even contribute our work to a larger community. 15) Do not have to maintain packages for multiple architectures, as pkg-get figures this out and gets the applicable packages. Cons: 1) Loss of control, I.E. - dependant on other peoples work. Response: I don't really fell that this is a big deal, as this is the nature of all open-source software. 2) What if a package isn't in CSW. Response: This is rare, but in the case it is, we are no worse of than before, and would just build a package that complies with Blastwave's standards. 3) Takes up a lot of space. Response: I feel that we can spare a few hundred megabytes (or even a gig or two), considering the huge size of modern disk drives. 4) No leverage over Blastwave.org, as we do over Sun. Response: Our most critical packages aren't even in /opt/sfw. They are hand compiled by us. At least with /opt/csw, you have dedicated maintainers, and a community, that you can go to for support. If you are still concerned, we can always do the same unit testing we do with our own hand built packages. In addition, because Blastwave is community supported, Blastwave's continued success depends on making sure they have a good reputation with that community. Because their process is very transparent, we know what they are doing, and why. On the other hand you have Sun's unsupported packages. We have no visibility into their build process, nor do we have any quick course of action to get these packages fixed. We don't even know who is maintaining them, or for that matter, if anyone is maintaining them! 5) To much change to our environment. Response: Rolling out /opt/csw in itself won't change the environment. (For that to happen you need to change LD_LIB...PATH, and PATH in .profile. We can also rollout one package at a time, as we need to upgrade them, and change the /usr/local symlinks as we roll out the individual packages. (This way we would not become overwhelmed with testing. Once this is in progress, we can choose to completely get rid of /opt/csw when we make our next build. 6) How do you make sure that if I roll out Samba today, and then roll Samba out to another system six months from now, I won't have different versions. Response: My take on this is the preferred method would be to upgrade all the old versions of Samba, which would bring consistency across our environment. The one problem with this line of argument is that for most organizations they rarely update their production version of there sidecar of open source tools. (Short of security alerts) There is a healthy fear of change. 7) Blastwave.org could fold. When it comes to open source packages, it doesn't matter if the maintainer goes away we can always go back to the source, and use the packaging standards and methodology that blastwave initialized.. (I'm afraid of this option, but it is an option) I think that in many organizations keeping a mirror of both the build tree and packages repositories will help provide assurance in the event of the blastwave organization running out of funding, or interested parties. I was wondering if blastwave has documented any automated unit testing that is done on the binaries? It would be great if I can show to people that before every stable build that blastwave as actually running the binaries with every option to a) make sure any syntax didn't break, and b) that the binaries actually do what they are supposed to. (Or at least will do what they did in prior versions). One last closing thought, is there any chance someone has any pull with Sun and can find out if they could join efforts with you? (I am referring to their resource starved /opt/sfw package tree) If Sun is going to supply community software that won't be supported, and is not really kept up to date, I feel it would make more sense for Sun to throw their "unofficial" support behind the community project, and reasign those engineers that are working on /opt/sfw to work with blastwave.org. One last, and really final, closing thought to Dennis, and friends. I sense that there may be a business opportunity here or in the near future. An official source of support for users of blastwave, could potentially have a very large customer base, if you take the amount of traffic your site gets. (We corporate types are so used to having a neck to choke, it is unnatural to us to walk without a guide) Thanks, Brian On 4/11/07, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > >> The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not > >> trust the logn term existence of a community project. > > > > You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence > > of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think > > that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company > > and then stops the production of a certain program? > > Well, if I apply that line of thinking along with the multiple interjected > little question marks then the answer is no. You cannot trust anything. > The sun will burn out in a few billion years. Long before that we can > expect another ice age. Possibly bad weather. Also, I will be dead. So > will everyone that you know and all these corporations will be less than a > historical footnote. > > So .. over and period of time you can depend on nothing and no one. > > There .. having said that you really have a hard time debating the > existence of this community project as well as the software released. It > exists today, yesterday and probably for quite some time now. So if you > want to hand roll your own because you can not depend on any given vendor > then thats fine. Just know that you may be totally right and wrong at the > same time. > > > IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially > > if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, > > Debian, ... > > > > (Yes, I know that you, Dennis, did not mean it that way.) > > I think I was trying to simply say that we are here. For any given short > sample of time you will see the project exists. If that sample window gets > too large then you will see that nothing exists. I think that maybe the > limit of the average mass of the universe as time approaches infinity will > be zero. > > nothing exists ? > > how ever will I send this email ? :-) > > Dennis > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From listen at alexander.skwar.name Thu Apr 12 11:52:57 2007 From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:52:57 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <61190.70.50.142.84.1176297469.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <1769717.6JgaPmDUlU@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> ken mays wrote: >> >>> Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME >>> 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully >>> have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being >>> pushed to the public mirrors. >>> >>> The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern >>> GNOME desktop for corporate and educational >>> institutions. >> >> Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the >> focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? > > Well, over any given length of time there is no such thing as "modern". > Let's just say that "current" would be real nice. Okay. However, the CURRENT version of Gnome is 2.18, at this point in time. BTW: "modern" was the word ken has chosen, that's why I reused it :) > I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an > absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it > released. I don't know that, but I assume that, yes. That's why I'm asking why time is spend on an obsolete version. Why not spend it on the current version? Alexander Skwar From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 12 14:10:13 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1769717.6JgaPmDUlU@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <789358.10474.qm@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Okay. However, the CURRENT version of Gnome is 2.18, at this point in time. BTW: "modern" was the word ken has chosen, that's why I reused it :) > I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an > absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it > released. I don't know that, but I assume that, yes. That's why I'm asking why time is spend on an obsolete version. Why not spend it on the current version? Alexander Skwar -------------------------- I am spending time on GNOME 2.18. I'm awaiting for certain packages to be submitted to unstable as we speak. Correctly, GNOME 2.14 and 2.16 are not obsolete versions - just older stable versions of GNOME. Most corporate environments usually stay one desktop version behind the latest version - until the latest version reaches a revision or two. Hopefully, we'll have the packages loaded this week so we can test them during the weekend. ~K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL From velociraptor at gmail.com Thu Apr 12 21:47:11 2007 From: velociraptor at gmail.com (velociraptor) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:47:11 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] KDE Konsole fonts Message-ID: Folks-- First off, thanks to all the maintainers and the founders for providing the Blastwave package repository, it certainly has made my Solaris 10 experience largely painless. I have a question about enabling new fonts for the konsole application in KDE. In particular, I am trying to get the terminal font, "terminus" to show up in the font selection list. I've done the requisite googling: *checked that the bitmap fonts are available to X * updated my Xft local.conf * forced fc-cache to rebuild the caches * restarted the X server software As the above didn't work, I've also tried: * copied them to the /opt/csw/kde-gcc/share/apps/konsole/fonts/ directory * then added them to KDE via the "kcmfontinst" While they do show up in the Control Center list of fonts there is still no sign of them in the Konsole Settings->Custom menu. I've even gone so far as to reboot. :-/ I am guessing that I've missed something obvious, but none of my reading of the various Linux "how-tos" is giving me a cluebat, any of you folks willing to oblige? Thanks in advance-- =Nadine= From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Sat Apr 14 12:57:59 2007 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:57:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found Message-ID: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, on a solaris 10 x86 machine, i'm using rt from blastwave (request tracker) but this morning, (certainly after upgrades?!), rt is broken due to: w2100-root% /etc/init.d/cswapache start Syntax error on line 206 of /opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started anybody can help? thanks gerard From brian.gupta at gmail.com Sat Apr 14 14:08:59 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:08:59 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found In-Reply-To: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <5b5090780704140508k61fb4b46r9cc4f2feab748bf6@mail.gmail.com> Did your httpd.conf get overwritten? (/opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf) -Brian On 4/14/07, G?rard Henry wrote: > hello all, > on a solaris 10 x86 machine, i'm using rt from blastwave (request tracker) > but this morning, (certainly after upgrades?!), rt is broken due to: > w2100-root% /etc/init.d/cswapache start > Syntax error on line 206 of /opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server: ld.so.1: > httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so: > symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found > /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started > > anybody can help? > > thanks > > > gerard > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From comand at blastwave.org Sat Apr 14 16:26:08 2007 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 07:26:08 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found In-Reply-To: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: On 4/14/07, G?rard Henry wrote: > hello all, > on a solaris 10 x86 machine, i'm using rt from blastwave (request tracker) > but this morning, (certainly after upgrades?!), rt is broken due to: > w2100-root% /etc/init.d/cswapache start > Syntax error on line 206 of /opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server: ld.so.1: > httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so: > symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found > /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started > > anybody can help? I just verified that the latest combination of apache2, mod_perl, and perl works on both SPARC and i386 systems. Please be sure that your CSWperl is up to date -- that is usually the cause of these missing symbol errors. Also, make sure that your libexec/libperl.so module isn't resolving symbols against a non-CSW perl library. HTH, Cory. From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Sat Apr 14 16:36:56 2007 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:36:56 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found In-Reply-To: References: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <4620E708.3030600@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> thanks for all replies i found my mistake, due to whole root zone. I deistanlled packages in global zones, resulting in errors in zone. So in zone, i de installed mod_perl, and immediately reinstalled, and now everything works. thanks again, gerard From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 00:36:57 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? Message-ID: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it might make sense to include it. Thanks, Brian From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 00:37:48 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:37:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Any change the monitoring application Nagios will be included? Message-ID: <5b5090780704161537w6a254009l2705334546abfed3@mail.gmail.com> Thanks, Brian From asmoore at blastwave.org Tue Apr 17 02:40:00 2007 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:40:00 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 "Brian Gupta" wrote: > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > might make sense to include it. > Sorry? Which respository? http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. Alex -- From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 03:25:27 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:25:27 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> What am I doing wrong? I typed the following and got no output: pkg-get -l |grep -i nag Thanks, Brian On 4/16/07, Alex Moore wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 > "Brian Gupta" wrote: > > > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > > might make sense to include it. > > > > Sorry? Which respository? > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > Alex > > -- > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Tue Apr 17 03:39:12 2007 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:39:12 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070417013912.GA3376@stampfli> pkg-get -l -> List installed packages pkg-get -a -> List available packages $ bin/pkg-get -a | grep -i nag nagios 2.7,REV=2007.01.27 nagiosp 1.4.6,REV=2007.02.06 xfce_manager 4.2.3,REV=2006.05.07 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:25:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > What am I doing wrong? I typed the following and got no output: > pkg-get -l |grep -i nag > > Thanks, > Brian > > On 4/16/07, Alex Moore wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 > > "Brian Gupta" wrote: > > > > > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > > > might make sense to include it. > > > > > > > Sorry? Which respository? > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > > > Alex > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 03:42:21 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:42:21 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <20070417013912.GA3376@stampfli> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> <20070417013912.GA3376@stampfli> Message-ID: <5b5090780704161842w1a5db1f3k9071e098658e6059@mail.gmail.com> Ack, I've been using ipkg (Embedded Linux package manager) alot the past view days. Sorry for the noob posts. -Brian On 4/16/07, Robert Stampfli wrote: > pkg-get -l -> List installed packages > pkg-get -a -> List available packages > > $ bin/pkg-get -a | grep -i nag > nagios 2.7,REV=2007.01.27 > nagiosp 1.4.6,REV=2007.02.06 > xfce_manager 4.2.3,REV=2006.05.07 > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:25:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > > What am I doing wrong? I typed the following and got no output: > > pkg-get -l |grep -i nag > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > On 4/16/07, Alex Moore wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 > > > "Brian Gupta" wrote: > > > > > > > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > > > > might make sense to include it. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry? Which respository? > > > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > > > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > > > users mailing list > > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Apr 18 17:57:49 2007 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:57:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] subversion client package Message-ID: Hey all, does anyone else see the need for a statically compiled client-only package of subversion that depends only on the necessary bits to enable client functionality? We are thinking about subversion as both a source code as well as a system configuration change management tool, but I will have a tough time getting our management to install blastwave + tons of apache/openldap/kerberos/whatever libs and binaries on all of our servers. Heck, getting blastwave on all of the servers would be a big hurdle to overcome! We are also thinking about mercurial as an alternative. python + hg is a much smaller footprint, and unfortunately we can use SMC packages to achieve that and stay within our current SOP's :( -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dared to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070418/3039ce6f/attachment.html From comand at blastwave.org Wed Apr 18 18:33:03 2007 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:33:03 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] subversion client package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 4/18/07, Mark McCoy wrote: > Hey all, does anyone else see the need for a statically compiled client-only > package of subversion that depends only on the necessary bits to enable > client functionality? > > We are thinking about subversion as both a source code as well as a system > configuration change management tool, but I will have a tough time getting > our management to install blastwave + tons of > apache/openldap/kerberos/whatever libs and binaries on all > of our servers. Heck, getting blastwave on all of the servers would be a > big hurdle to overcome! > > We are also thinking about mercurial as an alternative. python + hg is a > much smaller footprint, and unfortunately we can use SMC packages to achieve > that and stay within our current SOP's :( Hi Mark, I put in a couple of weeks of effort trying to get a static compile together for use at my last company. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to get such a large tool chain compiled statically. From what I experienced, the best way to do this is to compile subversion without ra_dav functionality, which would mean no repository access over http/https, limiting you to file:// or svn:// (svnserve) repositories. So, in short, we could provide a static subversion client, but it would be severely hobbled. If that's a problem, e.g. you (like many others) expect to access DAV repositories, then static is not an option. Regards, Cory. From uffe at uffe.org Wed Apr 18 18:52:45 2007 From: uffe at uffe.org (Uffe Jakobsen) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:52:45 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] subversion client package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <46264CDD.8010409@uffe.org> Mark McCoy wrote: > Hey all, does anyone else see the need for a statically compiled > client-only package of subversion that depends only on the necessary > bits to enable client functionality? Yes, less that a week ago I went through the same consideration because the list of dependancies is (more than) huge considering the numbers of systems that I need a subversion-client on (150+) But looking further into the dependancies I'm afraid (like Cory) that things are pretty much tied too much togheter - because I would need a subversion-client that would be able to do much of the networking stuff (but I guess that Kerberos, Openldap, BerkerlyDB and maybe a few other lib/pkg deps could be avoided for a "simple file" (FSFS) and "network-only" subversion-client ??? kind regards Uffe From lauren.wright at guamcell.net Thu Apr 19 05:07:17 2007 From: lauren.wright at guamcell.net (Lauren) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:07:17 +1000 Subject: [csw-users] SSL on Apache2 problem - Solaris 10 Message-ID: <04ae01c7822f$d6ea6db0$15c812ac@guamcell.com> Hi all, I am having trouble getting Apache 2 to listen on port 443. I am running Solaris 10 (new to me). I installed the SAMP packages from blastwave in this order: pkg-get install apache2 pkg-get install mysql5 pkg-get install php5 pkg-get install php5_mysql pkg-get install ap2_modphp5 I configured SSL support per this document: http://blogs.sun.com/jcecere/entry/building_64_bit_open_source3 Per instructions I read here, I also configured SSL support in SMF: # svccfg -s svc:/network/http:cswapache2 setprop httpd/ssl=true # svcadm refresh svc:/network/http:cswapache2 This appears to be set up correctly: # svcprop -p httpd/ssl svc:network/http:cswapache2 true # I also modified the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf to use the IP:443 rather than just 443 (after trying https with the default and it did not work). There is nothing I can see in the error logs that shows a problem: [Thu Apr 19 11:22:11 2007] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authent ication ... [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) PHP/5.2.1 configured -- resuming normal operations I can see when I do a netstat it still is not listening on 443. Regular http is working great, it is listening on 80 just fine. It is like it is not reading the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf. Just to test, I added a Listen directive for 443 in httpd.conf and then did a netstat - it started listening on 443: 172.18.100.161.80 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN 172.18.100.161.443 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN I am thinking that is is not reading httpd-ssl.conf at all. I have double and triple checked that I have the Include for httpd-ssl.conf uncommented in httpd.conf. Obviously I am missing something but I sure can't figure it out. I am hoping someone can please tell me what I am missing. Thanks very much Lauren. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070419/7a43b70f/attachment.html From lauren.wright at guamcell.net Thu Apr 19 08:04:25 2007 From: lauren.wright at guamcell.net (Lauren) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:04:25 +1000 Subject: [csw-users] SSL on Apache2 problem - Solaris 10 Message-ID: <058601c78248$95b91760$15c812ac@guamcell.com> Hi again, I got SSL working. Perhaps I am the only idiot out there who has not gotten this to work right away, but in case this can help someone else I will send what I did to the list. Here is what I missed - in httpd.conf the Include directive for SSL was inside the IfModule set like so: Include etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf SSLRandomSeed startup builtin SSLRandomSeed connect builtin I decided to try commenting it out and putting it outside of the set like so: Include etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf #Include etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf SSLRandomSeed startup builtin SSLRandomSeed connect builtin and I was rewarded with apache not starting and throwing the error that: [Thu Apr 19 14:43:20 2007] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart Syntax error on line 57 of /opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf: Invalid command 'SSLPassPhraseDialog', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration This was cool to me because that might mean it wasn't finding mod_ssl, so I checked that out and the mod_ssl was also inside a set: LoadModule ssl_module libexec/mod_ssl.so So I commented out the tags like so: # LoadModule ssl_module libexec/mod_ssl.so # and hey presto apache started, listening on 80 and 443. Thanks Lauren. -----Original Message----- From: Lauren [mailto:lauren.wright at guamcell.net] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:07 PM To: 'users at lists.blastwave.org' Subject: RE: SSL on Apache2 problem - Solaris 10 Hi all, I am having trouble getting Apache 2 to listen on port 443. I am running Solaris 10 (new to me). I installed the SAMP packages from blastwave in this order: pkg-get install apache2 pkg-get install mysql5 pkg-get install php5 pkg-get install php5_mysql pkg-get install ap2_modphp5 I configured SSL support per this document: http://blogs.sun.com/jcecere/entry/building_64_bit_open_source3 Per instructions I read here, I also configured SSL support in SMF: # svccfg -s svc:/network/http:cswapache2 setprop httpd/ssl=true # svcadm refresh svc:/network/http:cswapache2 This appears to be set up correctly: # svcprop -p httpd/ssl svc:network/http:cswapache2 true # I also modified the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf to use the IP:443 rather than just 443 (after trying https with the default and it did not work). There is nothing I can see in the error logs that shows a problem: [Thu Apr 19 11:22:11 2007] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authent ication ... [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) PHP/5.2.1 configured -- resuming normal operations I can see when I do a netstat it still is not listening on 443. Regular http is working great, it is listening on 80 just fine. It is like it is not reading the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf. Just to test, I added a Listen directive for 443 in httpd.conf and then did a netstat - it started listening on 443: 172.18.100.161.80 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN 172.18.100.161.443 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN I am thinking that is is not reading httpd-ssl.conf at all. I have double and triple checked that I have the Include for httpd-ssl.conf uncommented in httpd.conf. Obviously I am missing something but I sure can't figure it out. I am hoping someone can please tell me what I am missing. Thanks very much Lauren. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070419/95fef90a/attachment.html From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Apr 19 10:32:29 2007 From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> Alex Moore wrote: > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. I recently noticed that nrpe is available but check_nrpe is not, although it is contained in the source archive for nrpe. I checked the README.* files but could not find any reason for this. ciao Klaus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Apr 19 10:58:35 2007 From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:58:35 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Package submission and maintainance Message-ID: <20070419085835.130000@gmx.net> Hi, is it acceptable to submit new packages without being willing/able to be the maintainer? We need several Perl packages not yet available and I hope I am allowed to give them back to the community. It will not be possible to be the official maintainer. ciao Klaus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Thu Apr 19 11:21:29 2007 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:21:29 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] Package submission and maintainance Message-ID: <11209257819.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> It is not possbile. The best thing would be to ask for the missing packages on the "packages request form" available here: http://www. blastwave.org/pkgreq.php ...and then hope someone willing to be the mantainer will take over them. ----Messaggio originale---- Da: khfp. blastwave0704 at gmx.de Data: 19-apr-2007 10.58 A: Ogg: [csw-users] Package submission and maintainance Hi, is it acceptable to submit new packages without being willing/able to be the maintainer? We need several Perl packages not yet available and I hope I am allowed to give them back to the community. It will not be possible to be the official maintainer. ciao Klaus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From brian.gupta at gmail.com Thu Apr 19 12:17:08 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:17:08 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> References: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> Message-ID: <5b5090780704190317p79c55ee9g6a369583ecd423c8@mail.gmail.com> Good "catch". In the future please contact the protagonist. On 4/19/07, khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de wrote: > Alex Moore wrote: > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > I recently noticed that nrpe is available but check_nrpe is not, although > it is contained in the source archive for nrpe. > I checked the README.* files but could not find any reason for this. > > ciao > Klaus > -- > "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... > Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Apr 19 12:40:15 2007 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:40:15 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> References: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20070419054015.000047a0@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:29 +0200 khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de wrote: > I recently noticed that nrpe is available but check_nrpe is not, > although it is contained in the source archive for nrpe. > I checked the README.* files but could not find any reason for this. check_nrpe is the server-side module. It was included in the original CSWnagios by the original package maintainer. Since it only works with a nagios server installation, I left it there when I took over the package. For your reference, you can get to this page from several places; but I use this to find files within blastwave packages. http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch.php Alex -- From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Apr 19 13:26:20 2007 From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:26:20 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070419054015.000047a0@sws602.mcsun.local> References: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> <20070419054015.000047a0@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <20070419112620.181760@gmx.net> Alex Moore wrote > check_nrpe is the server-side module. It was included in the original > CSWnagios by the original package maintainer. Since it only works > with a nagios server installation, I left it there when I took over the > package. I checked the nrpe and nagiosp packages for this and until I read your message I was sure I had checked /var/sadm/install/contents on the server before I wrote to the list... oh well. ciao Klaus Heinz -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Fri Apr 20 03:49:55 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] CSW GNOME 2.16.3 for Solaris ... testing complete!!! In-Reply-To: <20070419112620.181760@gmx.net> Message-ID: <338307.29386.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hello, Thanks to the non-biased testing skills of Peter Felecan over at Blastwave.org whom assisted me in reviewing GNOME, we now have a production-grade version of GNOME 2.16.3 for Solaris 8/9/10 x86/SPARC and OpenSolaris distros (tested on OpenSolaris distro SXCE b35 (SPARC)and Solaris 10u3 (x86)). I made a valiant attempt to provide the some of the most recent GNOME apps and I've put GIMP 2.3.15 in the /testing area. We hope to have GNOME 2.16.3 available in the unstable area of the CSW mirrors by this weekend. Thanks to the many users that took the time to fill out bug reports and test the beta builds. I think you'll really like this port of GNOME - and there are more improvements on the way!!! ~ Ken Mays @ EarthLink, Inc. Blastwave.org GNOME 2.16.x/KDE maintainer __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From william at wbonnet.net Sun Apr 22 22:42:51 2007 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:42:51 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Xfce 4.4.1 is available Message-ID: <462BC8CB.6070706@wbonnet.net> Hi all I am pleased to announce after a long due time ... the first version of Xfce 4.4.1 packages. The package layout has been modified, a lot of new packages appeared. In order to reduce dependencies i have split several packages. A single package can become up to 4 new packages application libraries (lib* packages) headers (devel packages) documentation (doc packages This version is having a few known problems : On the packaging side, some "Incompatible" declaration are missing in the depend file. This is not (yet) an issue since you will have to remove existing xfce packages and install new ones by hand. This will be fixed in the next days On the application side, the sparc version of xfce4-panel has a major bug. It is segfaulting when the panels.xml config file contains a xfce4-menu declaration. Please be sure that this file does not contains a line like the following : < item name="xfce4-menu" id="42"/ > If it appears, but it in comment. The previous line should become You will be able to remove it when it will be fixed. Working on this... The file is stored in your $HOME under ~/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml, and in the installation /opt/csw/etc/xdg/xfce4/panel/panels.xml Please report any problems or improvement request. goodies like system load will follow after Xfce 4.4.1 will be submitted to unstable in 2 weeks if no major problem is reported. Regards William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From langley at med.unc.edu Wed Apr 25 22:33:36 2007 From: langley at med.unc.edu (Ken Langley) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:33:36 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] New python to stable? Message-ID: <462FBB20.1030501@med.unc.edu> I see that a new python (v.2.5) package is in testing. Is there a timeline for when it will be released to stable? Can my group help in the testing process? Thanks. -- Ken Langley Manager, Systems and Networking OIS/UNC School of Medicine From comand at blastwave.org Thu Apr 26 08:06:23 2007 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:06:23 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] New python to stable? In-Reply-To: <462FBB20.1030501@med.unc.edu> References: <462FBB20.1030501@med.unc.edu> Message-ID: On 4/25/07, Ken Langley wrote: > I see that a new python (v.2.5) package is in testing. Is there a > timeline for when it will be released to stable? Can my group help in > the testing process? Hi Ken, You are certainly welcome to assist with the testing. The outstanding issue is that any packages which have a binary dependency on python need to be updated. Now that focus has shifted away from the last stable release, more time is available to begin that process. Note that this is really only a concern if you use modules with a binary component (or packages that embed the Python interpreter). If you use pure python modules, you will continue to pick up blastwave installed modules in the 2.4 site-packages directory. HTH, Cory. From seriv at parkheights.dyndns.org Thu Apr 26 20:06:26 2007 From: seriv at parkheights.dyndns.org (Sergey) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:06:26 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions Message-ID: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> Hi everyone, I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages I'm using. These are mailserver related packages. I use dovecot, and I'm glad Blastwave has the newest version of this server. But I'd like to have pacage dovecot-devel and dovecot-sieve. Dovecot-devel should be build from the same sources as dovecot, but with 'enable-headers-install' option for ./configure. And then it will by possible to build against dovecot's headers and libraries dovecot cmu_sieve plugin. Also I'd like to see postfix with dovecot authentification support. Postfix has this support starting version 2.3, and Blastwave has 2.2.8, while already 2.4.1 released. Then I'd like to have packages dspam and squirrelmail, I will have them on by server in any case, but it would be better to prepare and make them for Blastwave repository. Also some packages, like CSWapache2, have errors, already reported in this mailing list, - may be there are some way to upload patches to bugzilla, or to get authorization to upload fixed packages with permission of the maintainer? I have filled up "CSW - Maintainer signup page" 2 days ago, and the message after submitting it promised reply within a few hours. Should I repeat this singup process, or I am rejected from being a csw maintainer? -- With best regards, Sergey Ivanov. From trygvis at inamo.no Fri Apr 27 00:12:43 2007 From: trygvis at inamo.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trygve_Laugst=F8l?=) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:12:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> Sergey wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long > time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages I'm > using. > These are mailserver related packages. I use dovecot, and I'm glad > Blastwave has the newest version of this server. > But I'd like to have pacage dovecot-devel and dovecot-sieve. > Dovecot-devel should be build from the same sources as dovecot, but with > 'enable-headers-install' option for ./configure. And then it will by > possible to build against dovecot's headers and libraries dovecot > cmu_sieve plugin. > Also I'd like to see postfix with dovecot authentification support. > Postfix has this support starting version 2.3, and Blastwave has 2.2.8, > while already 2.4.1 released. > Then I'd like to have packages dspam and squirrelmail, I will have them > on by server in any case, but it would be better to prepare and make > them for Blastwave repository. > Also some packages, like CSWapache2, have errors, already reported in > this mailing list, - may be there are some way to upload patches to > bugzilla, or to get authorization to upload fixed packages with > permission of the maintainer? > I have filled up "CSW - Maintainer signup page" 2 days ago, and the > message after submitting it promised reply within a few hours. Should I > repeat this singup process, or I am rejected from being a csw maintainer? I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider this as a ping :) -- Trygve From asmoore at blastwave.org Fri Apr 27 12:19:20 2007 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:19:20 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20070427051920.00002ba8@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:06:26 -0400 Sergey wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long > time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages > I'm using. Welcome Sergey, For packaging changes, you can file a bug report. See http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ On dovecot, I can make these changes; so you do not really need to file one for that package. If the other package maintainers do not reply here, please file a bug report. You should be hearing from someone on your request to be a maintainer. I know that we need maintainers and I have way too many packages. Some of these, I picked up because no one else stepped up. Dovecot is one those packages. Thanks, Alex From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Fri Apr 27 12:24:20 2007 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:24:20 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] new user questions Message-ID: <1123291e331.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> It's a quite slow process so you have to wait some days, then after - let's say 7 days - you don't get an answer, you could send a reminder to Dennis Clarke. Anyway even if you get rejected, you always get back an email with the response. Patience is the first pre-requisite for a good maintainer! ;) good luck alessio ----Messaggio originale---- Da: seriv at parkheights.dyndns.org Data: 26-apr-2007 20.06 A: Ogg: [csw-users] new user questions Hi everyone, I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages I'm using. These are mailserver related packages. I use dovecot, and I'm glad Blastwave has the newest version of this server. But I'd like to have pacage dovecot-devel and dovecot-sieve. Dovecot-devel should be build from the same sources as dovecot, but with 'enable-headers- install' option for ./configure. And then it will by possible to build against dovecot's headers and libraries dovecot cmu_sieve plugin. Also I'd like to see postfix with dovecot authentification support. Postfix has this support starting version 2.3, and Blastwave has 2.2.8, while already 2.4.1 released. Then I'd like to have packages dspam and squirrelmail, I will have them on by server in any case, but it would be better to prepare and make them for Blastwave repository. Also some packages, like CSWapache2, have errors, already reported in this mailing list, - may be there are some way to upload patches to bugzilla, or to get authorization to upload fixed packages with permission of the maintainer? I have filled up "CSW - Maintainer signup page" 2 days ago, and the message after submitting it promised reply within a few hours. Should I repeat this singup process, or I am rejected from being a csw maintainer? -- With best regards, Sergey Ivanov. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Apr 27 22:34:22 2007 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:34:22 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <1123291e331.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <1123291e331.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: On 4/27/07, Alessio Cervellin wrote: > It's a quite slow process so you have to wait some days, then after - > let's say 7 days - you don't get an answer, you could send a reminder > to Dennis Clarke. > Anyway even if you get rejected, you always get back > an email with the response. > > Patience is the first pre-requisite for a > good maintainer! ;) > > good luck > alessio > I have been somewhat swamped over the past week. The weekend isn't looking any better but the task queue is back to a LIFO stack as opposed to FILO. Worse .. sometimes things degrade to FIST stacks : First In and Stuck There. Dennis From jdp at syntelos.com Sat Apr 28 22:53:19 2007 From: jdp at syntelos.com (John Pritchard) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:53:19 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] ?help with ft2 related build problem? Message-ID: Hi, trying to build inkscape on a fairly clean 2.11 sparc system.. - usr/local is empty - just a solaris-express install 'snv_55b', not built from srcs - latest CSW catalog + packages as of this afternoon subject to dependencies, i was able to successfully configure inkscape-0.39with the following environment.. (latest that would configure with CSW dependents, current would be inkscape-0.45.1)... export CFLAGS='-mcpu=v9' export CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/bash' export LDFLAGS='-L/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib -L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' export CPPFLAGS='-I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include' export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig: /usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/sfw/lib/pkgconfig (generic) but got hung up with this.. looks weird.. (of course the file is there, yes).. [[i think others would be quick to sort this out]] jdp at mizar (inkscape-0.39) $ make make all-recursive Making all in src if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/opt/csw/include/gtk-2.0-I/opt/csw/lib/gtk- 2.0/include -I/opt/csw/include/atk-1.0 -I/opt/csw/include/cairo -I/opt/csw/include/pango-1.0 -I/opt/csw/include/glib-2.0-I/opt/csw/lib/glib- 2.0/include -I/opt/csw/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/opt/csw/include/sigc++-1.2-I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused-parameter -g -O2 -MT sp-chars.o-MD -MP -MF ".deps/sp- chars.Tpo" \ -c -o sp-chars.o `test -f 'sp-chars.cpp' || echo './'`sp-chars.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/sp-chars.Tpo" ".deps/sp-chars.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/sp-chars.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from ./libnrtype/font-instance.h:10, from sp-chars.cpp:26: /opt/csw/include/ft2build.h:56:38: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or directory In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: ./libnrtype/font-instance.h:11:11: #include expects "FILENAME" or In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: ./libnrtype/font-instance.h:45: error: `FT_Face' does not name a type In file included from style.h:18, from sp-chars.cpp:31: sp-marker.h: In member function `SPMarker* SPMarkerReference::getObject() const': sp-marker.h:94: warning: cast from `SPObject*' to `SPMarker*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_release(SPObject*)': sp-chars.cpp:101: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_modified(SPObject*, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:121: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp:128: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_bbox(SPItem*, NRRect*, const NR::Matrix&, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:137: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `NRArenaItem* sp_chars_show(SPItem*, NRArena*, unsigned int, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:156: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_clear(SPChars*)': sp-chars.cpp:177: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_add_element(SPChars*, guint, font_instance*, const NRMatrix*)': sp-chars.cpp:206: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_set_paintbox(SPChars*, NRRect*)': sp-chars.cpp:306: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `sp-chars.o' $ pkg-get -c freetype2 software localrev remoterev freetype2 2.1.10,REV=2005.12.11 SAME Thanks, .j.. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070428/47761600/attachment.html From ihsan at blastwave.org Sun Apr 29 00:43:54 2007 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:43:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> Message-ID: <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> Hello, on 27.04.2007 00:12 Trygve Laugst?l said the following: > I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman > package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. > > Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider > this as a ping :) You can also signup here: http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ http://gallery.dogan.ch/ http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Sun Apr 29 13:15:55 2007 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:15:55 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] ?help with ft2 related build problem? Message-ID: <1123d0dd3b0.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> try to set CFLAGS this way: epoxrt CFLAGS="$CFLAGS - I/opt/csw/include/freetype2" then run "configure" again, and then build... ----Messaggio originale---- Da: jdp at syntelos.com Data: 28- apr-2007 22.53 A: "blastwave users" Ogg: [csw-users] ?help with ft2 related build problem? Hi, trying to build inkscape on a fairly clean 2.11 sparc system.. - usr/local is empty - just a solaris-express install 'snv_55b', not built from srcs - latest CSW catalog + packages as of this afternoon subject to dependencies, i was able to successfully configure inkscape-0.39with the following environment.. (latest that would configure with CSW dependents, current would be inkscape-0.45.1)... export CFLAGS='- mcpu=v9' export CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/bash' export LDFLAGS='-L/lib - L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib - L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' export CPPFLAGS='-I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include - I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include - I/usr/sfw/include' export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig: /usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/sfw/lib/pkgconfig (generic) but got hung up with this.. looks weird.. (of course the file is there, yes).. [[i think others would be quick to sort this out]] jdp at mizar (inkscape- 0.39) $ make make all-recursive Making all in src if g++ - DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/opt/csw/include/gtk-2.0- I/opt/csw/lib/gtk- 2.0/include -I/opt/csw/include/atk-1.0 - I/opt/csw/include/cairo -I/opt/csw/include/pango-1.0 - I/opt/csw/include/glib-2.0-I/opt/csw/lib/glib- 2.0/include - I/opt/csw/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/opt/csw/include/sigc++-1.2- I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include - I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include - I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith - Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused- parameter -g -O2 -MT sp-chars.o-MD -MP -MF ".deps/sp- chars.Tpo" \ -c -o sp-chars.o `test -f 'sp-chars.cpp' || echo './'`sp-chars.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/sp-chars.Tpo" ".deps/sp-chars.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/sp- chars.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from ./libnrtype/font- instance.h:10, from sp-chars.cpp:26: /opt/csw/include/ft2build.h:56:38: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or directory In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: . /libnrtype/font-instance.h:11:11: #include expects "FILENAME" or In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: ./libnrtype/font- instance.h:45: error: `FT_Face' does not name a type In file included from style.h:18, from sp-chars.cpp:31: sp-marker.h: In member function `SPMarker* SPMarkerReference::getObject() const': sp- marker.h:94: warning: cast from `SPObject*' to `SPMarker*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_release(SPObject*)': sp-chars.cpp:101: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_modified(SPObject*, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:121: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: 128: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_bbox(SPItem*, NRRect*, const NR::Matrix&, unsigned int)': sp- chars.cpp:137: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `NRArenaItem* sp_chars_show(SPItem*, NRArena*, unsigned int, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:156: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_clear(SPChars*)': sp-chars.cpp:177: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_add_element (SPChars*, guint, font_instance*, const NRMatrix*)': sp-chars.cpp:206: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_set_paintbox(SPChars*, NRRect*)': sp-chars.cpp:306: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `sp-chars.o' $ pkg-get -c freetype2 software localrev remoterev freetype2 2.1.10,REV=2005.12.11 SAME Thanks, .j.. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From trygvis at inamo.no Sun Apr 29 17:06:31 2007 From: trygvis at inamo.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trygve_Laugst=F8l?=) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:06:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <4634B477.6020907@inamo.no> Ihsan Dogan wrote: > Hello, > > on 27.04.2007 00:12 Trygve Laugst?l said the following: > >> I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman >> package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. >> >> Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider >> this as a ping :) > > You can also signup here: http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php As I said, I have already signed up but haven't gotten any feedback yet. No rush, but I would like to get my package into the Blastwave system soon. -- Trygve From blastwave at gmail.com Sun Apr 29 19:16:43 2007 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:16:43 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4634B477.6020907@inamo.no> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> <4634B477.6020907@inamo.no> Message-ID: I'll try to figure out what the delay is ... On 4/29/07, Trygve Laugst?l wrote: > Ihsan Dogan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > on 27.04.2007 00:12 Trygve Laugst?l said the following: > > > >> I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman > >> package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. > >> > >> Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider > >> this as a ping :) > > > > You can also signup here: http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php > > As I said, I have already signed up but haven't gotten any feedback yet. > > No rush, but I would like to get my package into the Blastwave system soon. > > -- > Trygve > -- --- Dennis Clarke From jdp at syntelos.com Mon Apr 30 04:22:13 2007 From: jdp at syntelos.com (John Pritchard) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:22:13 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] ?help with build (inkscape) problem? solaris-2.11 sparc Message-ID: Hi.. Many thanks to Alessio for helping with this in the previous iteration. building inkscape-0.39 on snv_55b (solaris-2.11 sparc, solaris-express, not built from sources)... using /usr/sfw/bin/gcc [3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802)], CSS LD, latest CSW, plain vanilla environment... everything looks like it should be working fine, but i get link errors for libsigc++ (and some weird stuff comes from where?) mkdir .libs g++ -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused-parameter -g -O2 -o inkscape --export-dynamic main.o -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib -L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib libinkpre.a dialogs/libspdialogs.a xml/libspxml.a svg/libspsvg.a widgets/libspwidgets.a display/libspdisplay.a helper/libspchelp.a libnrtype/libnrtype.a libnr/libnr.a livarot/libvarot.a extension/libextension.a extension/implementation/libimplementation.a extension/internal/libinternal.a inkjar/libinkjar.a libinkpost.a/opt/csw/lib/libgtk- x11-2.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libatk-1.0.so -L/export/medusa/kenmays/build/glib-2.10.2/cswstage/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/studio/SOS8/SUNWspro/prod/lib /opt/csw/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -L/export/medusa/kenmays/build/v8_croco/libcroco-0.6.1/cswstage/opt/csw/lib/opt/csw/lib/libpangocairo- 1.0.so -L/opt/build/michael/xrender-0.8.3-buildroot/opt/csw/lib/opt/csw/lib/libcairo.so -lSM -lICE -lxml2 -lpthread -lsocket -lnsl /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so /opt/csw/lib/libpng12.so -lpopt /opt/csw/lib/libXft.so /opt/csw/lib/libXrender.so -lX11 /opt/csw/lib/libfontconfig.so /opt/csw/lib/libexpat.so /opt/csw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lsunmath /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so -lm /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so /opt/csw/lib/libiconv.so -lc /opt/csw/lib/libfreetype.so -lz -Wl,-R -Wl,/opt/csw/lib -Wl,-R -Wl,/opt/csw/lib -Wl,-R -Wl,/usr/openwin/lib Undefined first referenced symbol in file SigC::AdaptorBindSlotNode::AdaptorBindSlotNode(void (*)(void*), SigC::Node const&, void (*)(void*))libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) __1cG__CrunKpure_error6F_v_ /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so SigC::ObjectSlotNode::init(SigC::Object*, void*, void (SigC::Object::*)())libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::ObjectBase::reference() const libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::ObjectBase::unreference() constlibinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) virtual thunk to SigC::Object::~Object()libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) virtual thunk to SigC::Object::~Object()libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::Object::Object() libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::Object::~Object() libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::Object::~Object() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::Object::~Object() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::SignalBase::impl() const libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SlotNode::SlotNode(void (*)(void*))libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) vtable for SigC::ObjectSlotNode libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::Connection::disconnect() libinkpre.a(sp-offset.o) SigC::SignalNode::empty() libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::ObjectBase::set_manage() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::SignalNode::push_back(SigC::SlotBase const&)libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SignalNode::cleanup() libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SlotNode::~SlotNode() libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::SignalBase::SignalBase(SigC::SignalBase const&)libinkpre.a( sp-gradient.o) typeinfo for SigC::Object libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::ObjectBase::~ObjectBase() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) __1cG__CrunMex_rethrow_q6F_v_ /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so SigC::FuncSlotNode::FuncSlotNode(void (*)(void*), void (*)(void*))libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::Node::assign(SigC::NodeBase*) libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::Node::operator=(SigC::Node const&)libinkpre.a(sp-offset.o) SigC::SignalBase::~SignalBase() libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SignalBase::SignalBase() libinkpre.a(document.o) vtable for SigC::ObjectBase libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) c::c(n6, (int0_t)) /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so SigC::Node::clear() const libinkpre.a(document.o) __1c2k6Fpv_v_ /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to inkscape collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `inkscape' to reproduce this, my environment.. PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/java/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/dt/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ucb CFLAGS='-mcpu=v9' CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/bash' LDFLAGS='-L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib -L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' CPPFLAGS='-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include' PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/sfw/lib/pkgconfig and one patch to inkscape-0.39/src/main.cpp line 239, s/fpresetsticky/fpsetsticky/ for /usr/include/ieeefp.h otherwise ./configure && make (maybe the configure script is just wrong wrt the version of libsigc++ it's accepting). thoughts, comments, suggestions? many thanks, john -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070429/e7312f7f/attachment.html From james at blastwave.org Mon Apr 30 09:18:19 2007 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:18:19 GMT Subject: [csw-users] ?help with build (inkscape) problem? solaris-2.11 sparc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070430.7181900.3216354088@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 30/04/07, 03:22:13, John Pritchard wrote regarding [csw-users] ?help with build (inkscape) problem? solaris-2.11 sparc: > using /usr/sfw/bin/gcc [3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802)], CSS LD, latest > CSW, plain vanilla environment... > everything looks like it should be working fine, but i get link errors > for libsigc++ (and some weird stuff comes from where?) libsigc++ was built with CC and you are compiling with g++. If an API is pure C (it's not here) you might need to add Sun's libCrun and/or libCstd. For example in your list: $ dem __1cG__CrunKpure_error6F_v_ __1cG__CrunKpure_error6F_v_ == void __Crun::pure_error() that one is found in Crun. The ones from libinkpre.a are just mangled wrongly for the 2 compiler types. James. From william at wbonnet.net Mon Apr 30 12:01:47 2007 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:01:47 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary In-Reply-To: <20070430040103.GA22606@blastwave.org> References: <20070430040103.GA22606@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <4635BE8B.9090501@wbonnet.net> Hi Philip > Attached is the summary of changed or added packages for the last week > I see that jboss has been updated, is the maintainer still active ? I ask a few time on the list and had no answers. Regards -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From pfelecan at blastwave.org Mon Apr 2 09:34:50 2007 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:34:50 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Emacs 22 snapshot 20070401 CVS Message-ID: The monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, is in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.96,REV=cvs20070401-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.96,REV=cvs20070401-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package the next month. Enjoy -- Peter From william at wbonnet.net Tue Apr 3 01:36:51 2007 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:36:51 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.0.2 is available Message-ID: <46119393.7010200@wbonnet.net> Hi all dbus is available from testing. this is the first set of packages of the coming Xfce 4.4 There are three different packages : dbus, containing executables libdbus, containing dynamic libs libdbus_devel, containing development headers files are : dbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz dbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus_devel-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libdbus_devel-1.0.2,REV=2007.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If no problem is reported, these packages will be submited at the end of the stabilization. Regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From odenbach at uni-paderborn.de Tue Apr 3 15:53:28 2007 From: odenbach at uni-paderborn.de (Christopher Odenbach) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:53:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] pkg-get v2 makecontents file In-Reply-To: <55038.87.74.24.183.1175112739.squirrel@87.74.24.183> References: <55038.87.74.24.183.1175112739.squirrel@87.74.24.183> Message-ID: <200704031553.35031.odenbach@uni-paderborn.de> Hi, > Does anyone have a new makecontents script for creating pkg-get > repositories? The one at > http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/makecontents is for version 1 and > doesn't create the descriptions file. The script attached does a lot more (it creates a mix of different repositories, we use it to add our local packages to our blastwave mirror), but you should get the idea. I hope you get around with the German comments in it. If not, just ask. Christopher -- ====================================================== Dipl.-Ing. Christopher Odenbach Zentrum fuer Informations- und Medientechnologien Universitaet Paderborn Raum N5.110 odenbach at uni-paderborn.de Tel.: +49 5251 60 5315 ====================================================== -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: update_collections Type: application/x-perl Size: 7278 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maseda at unc.edu Wed Apr 4 17:35:03 2007 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:35:03 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Alternatives to LD_LIBRARY_PATH In-Reply-To: <20070131.9414100.4090405955@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <6d6f8480701300937v643f9e53kf3f64554eee4829b@mail.gmail.com> <20070130171316.00000a40@sws602.mcsun.local> <6d6f8480701302138r5047dad6w8be2239b92777066@mail.gmail.com> <20070131.9414100.4090405955@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <4613C5A7.3080804@unc.edu> Hi All, I am compiling (with CSW gcc3) some of my own (non-CSW) software into /opt/pkg, and am looking for an alternative to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The following page recommends LD_RUN_PATH and LDFLAGS: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=55641 But, I am not sure if the aforementioned variables are the best approach. Also, will CSW gcc3 respect these variables? I have heard that SFW gcc3 has a bug regarding that: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=7201 Please advise. Thx, Mike James Lee wrote: > On 31/01/07, 05:38:03, Louwtjie Burger wrote > regarding Re: [csw-users] Mysql 64bit: > > >> The link you supplied points to the "unstable version"... >> > > In fact the link points to the unstable *Sparc* version. Both > unstable and stable Sparc packages have 64bit support. > > > >> Here is my install (pkg-get -i mysql5) from the "stable" tree. >> > > >> [burgerw at pc:~]find /opt/csw/|grep mysqld >> find: cannot read dir /opt/csw/etc/sasldb2: Permission denied >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqldump >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqld_multi >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqld_safe >> /opt/csw/mysql5/bin/mysqldumpslow >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqldump.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqld.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqld_multi.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/man/man1/mysqld_safe.1 >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/i386/mysqld >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/pentium/mysqld >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/mysqld >> find: cannot read dir /opt/csw/mysql5/var: Permission denied >> [burgerw at pc:~]file /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/i386/mysqld >> /opt/csw/mysql5/libexec/i386/mysqld: ELF 32-bit LSB executable >> 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped >> [burgerw at pc:~] >> > > > There, we can see you are using the Intel version. > > AMD64 support from Blastwave is coming but we need supporting libraries > built before the larger projects like mysql can be built for AMD64. > Mysql uses openssl and we are waiting for that to be updated. > > > > > James. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Apr 5 15:20:41 2007 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:20:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem In-Reply-To: <1119d34ab0e.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <1119d34ab0e.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <4614F7A9.5070301@ericsson.com> Great, now it works. On 2007-03-29 12:19, Alessio Cervellin wrote: > It should be fixed now, try again please. > > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: mats.larsson at ericsson.com > Data: 26-mar-2007 14.06 > A: "questions and > discussions" > Ogg: Re: [csw-users] wireshark > pkg problem > > On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote: >> No matter how > many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get >> the > following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it: >> # (From site http: > //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) >> > software localrev remoterev >> wireshark 0.99.5 0.99.5, > rev=20946 >> Anyone else seeing this? > > Nobody? From maseda at unc.edu Mon Apr 9 16:52:08 2007 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:52:08 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] CSWapache2 In-Reply-To: <4613C5A7.3080804@unc.edu> References: <6d6f8480701300937v643f9e53kf3f64554eee4829b@mail.gmail.com> <20070130171316.00000a40@sws602.mcsun.local> <6d6f8480701302138r5047dad6w8be2239b92777066@mail.gmail.com> <20070131.9414100.4090405955@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <4613C5A7.3080804@unc.edu> Message-ID: <461A5318.7000407@unc.edu> Hi Cory, I cannot seem to get SSL working with CSWapache2 (2.2.0)... I have basically ported my CSWapache (1.3.34) config files over, and now SSL doesn't seem to work... Any thoughts? Mike From selundgr at uncc.edu Tue Apr 10 17:11:10 2007 From: selundgr at uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:11:10 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] CSWapache2 In-Reply-To: <461A5318.7000407@unc.edu> Message-ID: You'll need to migrate your configuration files. It's not a radical change from the 1.3 format to 2.2 but there are tweaks to be done. Looking in your error.log for apache to be complaining about what's wrong. You may want to also review: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/upgrading.html (from 1.3 to 2.0) http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/upgrading.html (from 2.0 to 2.2) Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services http://www.uncc.edu On 4/9/07 10:52 AM, "Mike Seda" wrote: > Hi Cory, > I cannot seem to get SSL working with CSWapache2 (2.2.0)... I have > basically ported my CSWapache (1.3.34) config files over, and now SSL > doesn't seem to work... Any thoughts? > Mike > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 20:07:33 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:07:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > The 2007-04 stable package collection has been finalised and will > reach mirror sites soon. Do not update your system yet, this is > prior notice. > > If you use postgresql you will have to do a dump before update > and a restore after. For more information see this message: > http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2007-March/005021.html > > > The final release will be announced shortly. expect a homepage update shortly. Dennis From zizban at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 20:10:58 2007 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:10:58 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? On 4/10/07, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > The 2007-04 stable package collection has been finalised and will > > reach mirror sites soon. Do not update your system yet, this is > > prior notice. > > > > If you use postgresql you will have to do a dump before update > > and a restore after. For more information see this message: > > http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2007-March/005021.html > > > > > > The final release will be announced shortly. > > > expect a homepage update shortly. > > Dennis > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 20:22:51 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:22:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less Dennis From james at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 20:31:20 2007 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:31:20 GMT Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <20070410.16472000.1630517079@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <1157.72.39.216.186.1176228453.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <20070410.18312000.3109488906@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 10/04/07, 19:22:51, Dennis Clarke wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04: > > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? > gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less Less actually, gnome is a sub package and the others are used elsewhere. Regrettably, gnome didn't meet the requirements for stable, hence there is no gnome desktop in stable. gnome from unstable works mostly, if a few corners were tidied it would be accepted for stable. James. From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Tue Apr 10 20:42:12 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less Dennis --------------------------- Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being pushed to the public mirrors. The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern GNOME desktop for corporate and educational institutions. Please test Evince and XPDF with all your PDF and postscript printing and viewing needs. Also, GIMP 2.3.15, EoG, and Gthumb for any picture viewing and editing needs. ~ Ken Mays ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 20:54:52 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:54:52 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance to community supported package repositories. Message-ID: <5b5090780704101154t428b6989rfb536cad1ec60021@mail.gmail.com> For a number of reasons, I feel it is the right path for us to move to get rid off /opt/sfw and move to /opt/csw. I also think that because blastwave is so comprehensive that we can almost entirely get out of having to compile and build our own packages. I am running into resistance to moving to a community supported package system/repository. (It's been ok'ed for use within our group, but not for rollout to the majority of our servers that host other groups applications.) I am wondering if anyone one has run into this, and how you dealt with it? Thanks, Brian From zizban at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 21:00:00 2007 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:00:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On 4/10/07, ken mays wrote: > > What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? > > gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less > > Dennis > --------------------------- > > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. > > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. > > Please test Evince and XPDF with all your PDF and > postscript printing and viewing needs. Also, GIMP > 2.3.15, EoG, and Gthumb for any picture viewing and > editing needs. > > ~ Ken Mays Maybe I need to try gnome again becaue last I tried, a week or two ago, Nautilus would crash every time I tried to move a file or move something to the trash. ____________________________________________________________________________ > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. > http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 21:04:58 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1362.72.39.216.186.1176231898.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> >> What version of Gnome is going to be the new stable? > > gnome-2.14.3,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_menus-2.15.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_minimal-2.8.0,REV=2007.01.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_panel-2.14.3,REV=2006.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_python-2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnome_spell-1.0.5,REV=2004.03.15-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.16.1,REV=2006.10.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomekeyring-0.4.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomevfs2-2.14.2,REV=2006.09.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > looks like GNOME 2.14.3 more or less > > Dennis > --------------------------- > > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. I have a pile of software here to push around for testing and things have not gone quickly. Too many distractions with matters that don't help productivity. I'll ignore everything ( or try ) and get this done. > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. With nice artwork and splash screens too :-) > Please test Evince and XPDF with all your PDF and > postscript printing and viewing needs. Also, GIMP > 2.3.15, EoG, and Gthumb for any picture viewing and > editing needs. I use GIMP all the time. Literally. I'll get onto that also. Dennis From blastwave at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 21:22:15 2007 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:22:15 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? Message-ID: > For a number of reasons, I feel it is the right path for us to move to > get rid off /opt/sfw and move to /opt/csw. I also think that because > blastwave is so comprehensive that we can almost entirely get out of > having to compile and build our own packages. > > I am running into resistance to moving to a community supported > package system/repository. (It's been ok'ed for use within our group, > but not for rollout to the majority of our servers that host other > groups applications.) > > I am wondering if anyone one has run into this, and how you dealt with it? You could also post this sort of thing on the OpenSolaris discuss list and see what feedback you get. I want you to know that we have fairly decent Solaris 10 build servers that sit idle also. We also have a Niagara T2000 server and a decent Opteron server or two for people to participate with. Free to use provided you conform to standards. I do note that the Companion CD people ( at Sun ) released five or six packages today. At the risk of being shallow I think that the Blastwave project will release 1,544 packages via the stable release today. Of those there are 583 updates since the 1st of January. The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not trust the logn term existence of a community project. Since October of 2002 I think we have had less than five days of downtime due to server rooms moves, bandwidth changes and power outages. Most corporations can not report that sort of stability. Dennis Clarke ps: and Debian Linux is a "community" project also. Ten years + ? From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Apr 10 21:26:31 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] Resistance to community supported package repositories. In-Reply-To: <5b5090780704101154t428b6989rfb536cad1ec60021@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b5090780704101154t428b6989rfb536cad1ec60021@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1396.72.39.216.186.1176233191.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > For a number of reasons, I feel it is the right path for us to move to > get rid off /opt/sfw and move to /opt/csw. I also think that because > blastwave is so comprehensive that we can almost entirely get out of > having to compile and build our own packages. > > I am running into resistance to moving to a community supported > package system/repository. (It's been ok'ed for use within our group, > but not for rollout to the majority of our servers that host other > groups applications.) > > I am wondering if anyone one has run into this, and how you dealt with it? You could also post this sort of thing on the OpenSolaris discuss list and see what feedback you get. I want you to know that we have fairly decent Solaris 10 build servers that sit idle also. We also have a Niagara T2000 server and a decent Opteron server or two for people to participate with. Free to use provided you conform to standards. I do note that the Companion CD people ( at Sun ) released five or six packages today. At the risk of being shallow I think that the Blastwave project will release 1,544 packages via the stable release today. Of those there are 583 updates since the 1st of January. The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not trust the logn term existence of a community project. Since October of 2002 I think we have had less than five days of downtime due to server rooms moves, bandwidth changes and power outages. Most corporations can not report that sort of stability. Dennis Clarke ps: and Debian Linux is a "community" project also. Ten years + ? From listen at alexander.skwar.name Wed Apr 11 12:23:46 2007 From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:23:46 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? References: Message-ID: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Dennis Clarke wrote: > The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not > trust the logn term existence of a community project. You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company and then stops the production of a certain program? IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, Debian, ... (Yes, I know that you, Dennis, did not mean it that way.) Alexander Skwar From listen at alexander.skwar.name Wed Apr 11 12:25:27 2007 From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:25:27 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> ken mays wrote: > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. > > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Alexander Skwar From ihsan at blastwave.org Wed Apr 11 13:49:30 2007 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:49:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? In-Reply-To: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <461CCB4A.5030701@blastwave.org> Hello Alexander, Am 11.4.2007 12:23 Uhr, Alexander Skwar schrieb: >> The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not >> trust the logn term existence of a community project. > > You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence > of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think > that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company > and then stops the production of a certain program? Well, I hear that very often from people, who never worked in a professional environment, where it really matters if your system is running or not. > IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially > if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, > Debian, ... We are doing our best too provide you the best quality. But you shouldn't forget, that all people at Blastwave are doing this in their free time and no one is getting payed for that, what he is doing. That means, that we do not provide 24h support with SLA if something doesn't work. This is something what you can get from commercial software, but not from OSS projects. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ http://gallery.dogan.ch/ http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Wed Apr 11 14:21:30 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <944612.3999.qm@web33607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> ken mays wrote: > Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME > 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully > have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being > pushed to the public mirrors. > > The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern > GNOME desktop for corporate and educational > institutions. Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Alexander Skwar --------------------- Alex, Well... good question there! I've actually started on GNOME 2.18.x packaging. GNOME 2.16.3 review is done so I wanted to push that out first. ;o> ~ Ken ____________________________________________________________________________________ Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367 From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 11 15:12:56 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? In-Reply-To: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <61185.70.50.142.84.1176297176.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not >> trust the logn term existence of a community project. > > You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence > of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think > that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company > and then stops the production of a certain program? Well, if I apply that line of thinking along with the multiple interjected little question marks then the answer is no. You cannot trust anything. The sun will burn out in a few billion years. Long before that we can expect another ice age. Possibly bad weather. Also, I will be dead. So will everyone that you know and all these corporations will be less than a historical footnote. So .. over and period of time you can depend on nothing and no one. There .. having said that you really have a hard time debating the existence of this community project as well as the software released. It exists today, yesterday and probably for quite some time now. So if you want to hand roll your own because you can not depend on any given vendor then thats fine. Just know that you may be totally right and wrong at the same time. > IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially > if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, > Debian, ... > > (Yes, I know that you, Dennis, did not mean it that way.) I think I was trying to simply say that we are here. For any given short sample of time you will see the project exists. If that sample window gets too large then you will see that nothing exists. I think that maybe the limit of the average mass of the universe as time approaches infinity will be zero. nothing exists ? how ever will I send this email ? :-) Dennis From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 11 15:17:49 2007 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:17:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <61190.70.50.142.84.1176297469.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > ken mays wrote: > >> Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME >> 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully >> have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being >> pushed to the public mirrors. >> >> The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern >> GNOME desktop for corporate and educational >> institutions. > > Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the > focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Well, over any given length of time there is no such thing as "modern". Let's just say that "current" would be real nice. I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it released. Half of my problems with testing is that I am using Solaris 8 to test with and the machines are slow and old. A single cycle of "install GNOME" and then test and then pkgrm takes hours and hours. Dennis From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Wed Apr 11 16:31:16 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <61190.70.50.142.84.1176297469.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <845624.88777.qm@web33612.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > ken mays wrote: > >> Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME >> 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully >> have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being >> pushed to the public mirrors. >> >> The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern >> GNOME desktop for corporate and educational >> institutions. > > Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the > focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? Well, over any given length of time there is no such thing as "modern". Let's just say that "current" would be real nice. I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it released. Half of my problems with testing is that I am using Solaris 8 to test with and the machines are slow and old. A single cycle of "install GNOME" and then test and then pkgrm takes hours and hours. Dennis -------------------------------- GNOME 2.18.0 depends on components not available for Sun Solaris 8 at this time. Due to Sun's EOL/EOS status of Solaris 8, it is NOT in **my** best interest to port GNOME 2.18.x to Solaris 8. I've tagged GNOME 2.18.x for Solaris 10/11 for now. GNOME 2.16.x is the both modern and 'recently' current. You don't have GNOME 2.16.x on hardly *ANY* of the commercial UNIX-certified OS releases. Something to think about when you get a modern desktop environment nowadays with free support. I've started pushing up the updated GNOME packages for unstable release. Please test and review for feedback.. ~ Ken Mays ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Apr 11 16:37:56 2007 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: 11 Apr 2007 14:37:56 -0000 Subject: [csw-users] KNotify Message-ID: <23320-19629@sneakemail.com> I think I've turned something on that causes a "Notification - KNotify" dialog to pop up saying "unminimize" every time I open a minimimized application window. It's rather annoying, but I can't figure out how to turn it off? Anyone using KDE have a suggestion? FYI, I am using KDE from blastwave on Solaris 10 (sparc). Thank you From brian.gupta at gmail.com Wed Apr 11 22:57:49 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:57:49 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Resistance ? In-Reply-To: <61185.70.50.142.84.1176297176.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <2979399.VCNHhx053R@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <61185.70.50.142.84.1176297176.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <5b5090780704111357y70a6a966x68960b5955c77ddf@mail.gmail.com> I have tried to summarize the pros and cons, as I see them. In addition I have added responses towhat I believe are perceived cons. I am starting to make some progress, with my colleagues. I just now need to come up with a workable stable deployment plan within the next few months. For inclusion in our next refresh of our jumpstart build after 04/07. I am thinking we might need to keep a local replica of the repository with point in time snapshots of older trees. But I digress, I will start up another thread to discuss deployment methodologies.) Here is an expanded list of pros/cons for your review and response. (If you think it makes sense to incorporate some of all of this into some knowledge base, feel free). I believe the following are pros: 1) All Blastwave packages track dependencies and will install them automatically (Unless you keep the default configuration to ask first.) 2) Blastwave is completely independent, in that there are no dependencies on libraries or packages that lie outside of the /opt/csw tree. 3) Updates are released quarterly http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/announce/2007-January/000042.html (They rebuild and test the tree, once a quarter, to release the quarterly stable builds) 4) Blastwave.org sends out email updates if a critical security bug is found. They also immediately generate a new package and add it to the stable tree. Sun does not provide this critical service for /opt/sfw packages. 5) Saves time when installing finicky packages that weren't originally built with Solaris in mind. (IE: Getting Linux only packages that rely on Linux libraries to build, etc) 6) Dedicated team where each member is responsible for maintaining certain packages, so they get very familiar with said packages. 7) 1500+ prebuilt packages in the repository. 8) Currently only one person in our group has the knowledge to build and maintain System V packages. If we went to /opt/csw this would no longer be an issue. 9) Built with the latest Sun compiler, unless the package needs gcc. 10) Very simple to list all the packages, list installed packages, update installed packages, and remove packages. 11) Packages are much more recent than /opt/sfw/ 12) Blastwave has been releasing packages since Solaris 8. (Over 5 years) 13) The Sun /opt/sfw distribution is a VERY limited in the number of packages. 14) In the rare event that we need to compile our own package, if it is built in such a way that it conforms to the Blastwave.org's standards, we will have no conflicts, and could even contribute our work to a larger community. 15) Do not have to maintain packages for multiple architectures, as pkg-get figures this out and gets the applicable packages. Cons: 1) Loss of control, I.E. - dependant on other peoples work. Response: I don't really fell that this is a big deal, as this is the nature of all open-source software. 2) What if a package isn't in CSW. Response: This is rare, but in the case it is, we are no worse of than before, and would just build a package that complies with Blastwave's standards. 3) Takes up a lot of space. Response: I feel that we can spare a few hundred megabytes (or even a gig or two), considering the huge size of modern disk drives. 4) No leverage over Blastwave.org, as we do over Sun. Response: Our most critical packages aren't even in /opt/sfw. They are hand compiled by us. At least with /opt/csw, you have dedicated maintainers, and a community, that you can go to for support. If you are still concerned, we can always do the same unit testing we do with our own hand built packages. In addition, because Blastwave is community supported, Blastwave's continued success depends on making sure they have a good reputation with that community. Because their process is very transparent, we know what they are doing, and why. On the other hand you have Sun's unsupported packages. We have no visibility into their build process, nor do we have any quick course of action to get these packages fixed. We don't even know who is maintaining them, or for that matter, if anyone is maintaining them! 5) To much change to our environment. Response: Rolling out /opt/csw in itself won't change the environment. (For that to happen you need to change LD_LIB...PATH, and PATH in .profile. We can also rollout one package at a time, as we need to upgrade them, and change the /usr/local symlinks as we roll out the individual packages. (This way we would not become overwhelmed with testing. Once this is in progress, we can choose to completely get rid of /opt/csw when we make our next build. 6) How do you make sure that if I roll out Samba today, and then roll Samba out to another system six months from now, I won't have different versions. Response: My take on this is the preferred method would be to upgrade all the old versions of Samba, which would bring consistency across our environment. The one problem with this line of argument is that for most organizations they rarely update their production version of there sidecar of open source tools. (Short of security alerts) There is a healthy fear of change. 7) Blastwave.org could fold. When it comes to open source packages, it doesn't matter if the maintainer goes away we can always go back to the source, and use the packaging standards and methodology that blastwave initialized.. (I'm afraid of this option, but it is an option) I think that in many organizations keeping a mirror of both the build tree and packages repositories will help provide assurance in the event of the blastwave organization running out of funding, or interested parties. I was wondering if blastwave has documented any automated unit testing that is done on the binaries? It would be great if I can show to people that before every stable build that blastwave as actually running the binaries with every option to a) make sure any syntax didn't break, and b) that the binaries actually do what they are supposed to. (Or at least will do what they did in prior versions). One last closing thought, is there any chance someone has any pull with Sun and can find out if they could join efforts with you? (I am referring to their resource starved /opt/sfw package tree) If Sun is going to supply community software that won't be supported, and is not really kept up to date, I feel it would make more sense for Sun to throw their "unofficial" support behind the community project, and reasign those engineers that are working on /opt/sfw to work with blastwave.org. One last, and really final, closing thought to Dennis, and friends. I sense that there may be a business opportunity here or in the near future. An official source of support for users of blastwave, could potentially have a very large customer base, if you take the amount of traffic your site gets. (We corporate types are so used to having a neck to choke, it is unnatural to us to walk without a guide) Thanks, Brian On 4/11/07, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > >> The one argument that you will get thrown at you is that you can not > >> trust the logn term existence of a community project. > > > > You might hear that, yes - but can you trust the long term existence > > of a company or a commercial product? Can you? How? What makes you think > > that? Is it not thinkable, that a "hostile" company buys another company > > and then stops the production of a certain program? > > Well, if I apply that line of thinking along with the multiple interjected > little question marks then the answer is no. You cannot trust anything. > The sun will burn out in a few billion years. Long before that we can > expect another ice age. Possibly bad weather. Also, I will be dead. So > will everyone that you know and all these corporations will be less than a > historical footnote. > > So .. over and period of time you can depend on nothing and no one. > > There .. having said that you really have a hard time debating the > existence of this community project as well as the software released. It > exists today, yesterday and probably for quite some time now. So if you > want to hand roll your own because you can not depend on any given vendor > then thats fine. Just know that you may be totally right and wrong at the > same time. > > > IMO the argument that you, Dennis, brought up is totally flawed. Especially > > if we're talking about (now) large projects as Blastwave, OpenSolaris, > > Debian, ... > > > > (Yes, I know that you, Dennis, did not mean it that way.) > > I think I was trying to simply say that we are here. For any given short > sample of time you will see the project exists. If that sample window gets > too large then you will see that nothing exists. I think that maybe the > limit of the average mass of the universe as time approaches infinity will > be zero. > > nothing exists ? > > how ever will I send this email ? :-) > > Dennis > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From listen at alexander.skwar.name Thu Apr 12 11:52:57 2007 From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:52:57 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 References: <1267.72.39.216.186.1176229371.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <773021.82223.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <2105746.2EEPLmRQRB@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <61190.70.50.142.84.1176297469.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <1769717.6JgaPmDUlU@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> ken mays wrote: >> >>> Yes. GNOME 2.14.3 was the main goal. We now have GNOME >>> 2.16.3 as the final target which we will hopefully >>> have up by this week once stable 2007-04 is being >>> pushed to the public mirrors. >>> >>> The focus is mainly to have a fully working modern >>> GNOME desktop for corporate and educational >>> institutions. >> >> Just curious - why not go to Gnome 2.18 directly, if the >> focus is to have a modern GNOME desktop? > > Well, over any given length of time there is no such thing as "modern". > Let's just say that "current" would be real nice. Okay. However, the CURRENT version of Gnome is 2.18, at this point in time. BTW: "modern" was the word ken has chosen, that's why I reused it :) > I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an > absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it > released. I don't know that, but I assume that, yes. That's why I'm asking why time is spend on an obsolete version. Why not spend it on the current version? Alexander Skwar From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 12 14:10:13 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] Stable Release 2007-04 In-Reply-To: <1769717.6JgaPmDUlU@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Message-ID: <789358.10474.qm@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Okay. However, the CURRENT version of Gnome is 2.18, at this point in time. BTW: "modern" was the word ken has chosen, that's why I reused it :) > I'm not about to debate the versions released because I know as an > absolute fact that it takes *lot* of work to test GNOME in order to get it > released. I don't know that, but I assume that, yes. That's why I'm asking why time is spend on an obsolete version. Why not spend it on the current version? Alexander Skwar -------------------------- I am spending time on GNOME 2.18. I'm awaiting for certain packages to be submitted to unstable as we speak. Correctly, GNOME 2.14 and 2.16 are not obsolete versions - just older stable versions of GNOME. Most corporate environments usually stay one desktop version behind the latest version - until the latest version reaches a revision or two. Hopefully, we'll have the packages loaded this week so we can test them during the weekend. ~K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL From velociraptor at gmail.com Thu Apr 12 21:47:11 2007 From: velociraptor at gmail.com (velociraptor) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:47:11 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] KDE Konsole fonts Message-ID: Folks-- First off, thanks to all the maintainers and the founders for providing the Blastwave package repository, it certainly has made my Solaris 10 experience largely painless. I have a question about enabling new fonts for the konsole application in KDE. In particular, I am trying to get the terminal font, "terminus" to show up in the font selection list. I've done the requisite googling: *checked that the bitmap fonts are available to X * updated my Xft local.conf * forced fc-cache to rebuild the caches * restarted the X server software As the above didn't work, I've also tried: * copied them to the /opt/csw/kde-gcc/share/apps/konsole/fonts/ directory * then added them to KDE via the "kcmfontinst" While they do show up in the Control Center list of fonts there is still no sign of them in the Konsole Settings->Custom menu. I've even gone so far as to reboot. :-/ I am guessing that I've missed something obvious, but none of my reading of the various Linux "how-tos" is giving me a cluebat, any of you folks willing to oblige? Thanks in advance-- =Nadine= From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Sat Apr 14 12:57:59 2007 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:57:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found Message-ID: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, on a solaris 10 x86 machine, i'm using rt from blastwave (request tracker) but this morning, (certainly after upgrades?!), rt is broken due to: w2100-root% /etc/init.d/cswapache start Syntax error on line 206 of /opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started anybody can help? thanks gerard From brian.gupta at gmail.com Sat Apr 14 14:08:59 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:08:59 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found In-Reply-To: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <5b5090780704140508k61fb4b46r9cc4f2feab748bf6@mail.gmail.com> Did your httpd.conf get overwritten? (/opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf) -Brian On 4/14/07, G?rard Henry wrote: > hello all, > on a solaris 10 x86 machine, i'm using rt from blastwave (request tracker) > but this morning, (certainly after upgrades?!), rt is broken due to: > w2100-root% /etc/init.d/cswapache start > Syntax error on line 206 of /opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server: ld.so.1: > httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so: > symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found > /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started > > anybody can help? > > thanks > > > gerard > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From comand at blastwave.org Sat Apr 14 16:26:08 2007 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 07:26:08 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found In-Reply-To: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: On 4/14/07, G?rard Henry wrote: > hello all, > on a solaris 10 x86 machine, i'm using rt from blastwave (request tracker) > but this morning, (certainly after upgrades?!), rt is broken due to: > w2100-root% /etc/init.d/cswapache start > Syntax error on line 206 of /opt/csw/apache/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server: ld.so.1: > httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/apache/libexec/libperl.so: > symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr: referenced symbol not found > /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be started > > anybody can help? I just verified that the latest combination of apache2, mod_perl, and perl works on both SPARC and i386 systems. Please be sure that your CSWperl is up to date -- that is usually the cause of these missing symbol errors. Also, make sure that your libexec/libperl.so module isn't resolving symbols against a non-CSW perl library. HTH, Cory. From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Sat Apr 14 16:36:56 2007 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:36:56 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] mpd_perl problem: symbol Perl_Gthr_key_ptr not found In-Reply-To: References: <4620B3B7.10907@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <4620E708.3030600@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> thanks for all replies i found my mistake, due to whole root zone. I deistanlled packages in global zones, resulting in errors in zone. So in zone, i de installed mod_perl, and immediately reinstalled, and now everything works. thanks again, gerard From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 00:36:57 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? Message-ID: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it might make sense to include it. Thanks, Brian From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 00:37:48 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:37:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Any change the monitoring application Nagios will be included? Message-ID: <5b5090780704161537w6a254009l2705334546abfed3@mail.gmail.com> Thanks, Brian From asmoore at blastwave.org Tue Apr 17 02:40:00 2007 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:40:00 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 "Brian Gupta" wrote: > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > might make sense to include it. > Sorry? Which respository? http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. Alex -- From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 03:25:27 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:25:27 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> What am I doing wrong? I typed the following and got no output: pkg-get -l |grep -i nag Thanks, Brian On 4/16/07, Alex Moore wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 > "Brian Gupta" wrote: > > > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > > might make sense to include it. > > > > Sorry? Which respository? > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > Alex > > -- > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Tue Apr 17 03:39:12 2007 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:39:12 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070417013912.GA3376@stampfli> pkg-get -l -> List installed packages pkg-get -a -> List available packages $ bin/pkg-get -a | grep -i nag nagios 2.7,REV=2007.01.27 nagiosp 1.4.6,REV=2007.02.06 xfce_manager 4.2.3,REV=2006.05.07 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:25:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > What am I doing wrong? I typed the following and got no output: > pkg-get -l |grep -i nag > > Thanks, > Brian > > On 4/16/07, Alex Moore wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 > > "Brian Gupta" wrote: > > > > > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > > > might make sense to include it. > > > > > > > Sorry? Which respository? > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > > > Alex > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From brian.gupta at gmail.com Tue Apr 17 03:42:21 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:42:21 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Are there any plans to include Nagios in the repository? In-Reply-To: <20070417013912.GA3376@stampfli> References: <5b5090780704161536k3925abc6n915e332bbef794b@mail.gmail.com> <20070416194000.00003a8b@sws602.mcsun.local> <5b5090780704161825r34123a54yc4fa19b3db30f413@mail.gmail.com> <20070417013912.GA3376@stampfli> Message-ID: <5b5090780704161842w1a5db1f3k9071e098658e6059@mail.gmail.com> Ack, I've been using ipkg (Embedded Linux package manager) alot the past view days. Sorry for the noob posts. -Brian On 4/16/07, Robert Stampfli wrote: > pkg-get -l -> List installed packages > pkg-get -a -> List available packages > > $ bin/pkg-get -a | grep -i nag > nagios 2.7,REV=2007.01.27 > nagiosp 1.4.6,REV=2007.02.06 > xfce_manager 4.2.3,REV=2006.05.07 > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:25:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > > What am I doing wrong? I typed the following and got no output: > > pkg-get -l |grep -i nag > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > On 4/16/07, Alex Moore wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:57 -0400 > > > "Brian Gupta" wrote: > > > > > > > I think this is a pretty standard application for monitoring, and it > > > > might make sense to include it. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry? Which respository? > > > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > > > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > > > users mailing list > > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From realmcking at gmail.com Wed Apr 18 17:57:49 2007 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:57:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] subversion client package Message-ID: Hey all, does anyone else see the need for a statically compiled client-only package of subversion that depends only on the necessary bits to enable client functionality? We are thinking about subversion as both a source code as well as a system configuration change management tool, but I will have a tough time getting our management to install blastwave + tons of apache/openldap/kerberos/whatever libs and binaries on all of our servers. Heck, getting blastwave on all of the servers would be a big hurdle to overcome! We are also thinking about mercurial as an alternative. python + hg is a much smaller footprint, and unfortunately we can use SMC packages to achieve that and stay within our current SOP's :( -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dared to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From comand at blastwave.org Wed Apr 18 18:33:03 2007 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:33:03 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] subversion client package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 4/18/07, Mark McCoy wrote: > Hey all, does anyone else see the need for a statically compiled client-only > package of subversion that depends only on the necessary bits to enable > client functionality? > > We are thinking about subversion as both a source code as well as a system > configuration change management tool, but I will have a tough time getting > our management to install blastwave + tons of > apache/openldap/kerberos/whatever libs and binaries on all > of our servers. Heck, getting blastwave on all of the servers would be a > big hurdle to overcome! > > We are also thinking about mercurial as an alternative. python + hg is a > much smaller footprint, and unfortunately we can use SMC packages to achieve > that and stay within our current SOP's :( Hi Mark, I put in a couple of weeks of effort trying to get a static compile together for use at my last company. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to get such a large tool chain compiled statically. From what I experienced, the best way to do this is to compile subversion without ra_dav functionality, which would mean no repository access over http/https, limiting you to file:// or svn:// (svnserve) repositories. So, in short, we could provide a static subversion client, but it would be severely hobbled. If that's a problem, e.g. you (like many others) expect to access DAV repositories, then static is not an option. Regards, Cory. From uffe at uffe.org Wed Apr 18 18:52:45 2007 From: uffe at uffe.org (Uffe Jakobsen) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:52:45 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] subversion client package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <46264CDD.8010409@uffe.org> Mark McCoy wrote: > Hey all, does anyone else see the need for a statically compiled > client-only package of subversion that depends only on the necessary > bits to enable client functionality? Yes, less that a week ago I went through the same consideration because the list of dependancies is (more than) huge considering the numbers of systems that I need a subversion-client on (150+) But looking further into the dependancies I'm afraid (like Cory) that things are pretty much tied too much togheter - because I would need a subversion-client that would be able to do much of the networking stuff (but I guess that Kerberos, Openldap, BerkerlyDB and maybe a few other lib/pkg deps could be avoided for a "simple file" (FSFS) and "network-only" subversion-client ??? kind regards Uffe From lauren.wright at guamcell.net Thu Apr 19 05:07:17 2007 From: lauren.wright at guamcell.net (Lauren) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:07:17 +1000 Subject: [csw-users] SSL on Apache2 problem - Solaris 10 Message-ID: <04ae01c7822f$d6ea6db0$15c812ac@guamcell.com> Hi all, I am having trouble getting Apache 2 to listen on port 443. I am running Solaris 10 (new to me). I installed the SAMP packages from blastwave in this order: pkg-get install apache2 pkg-get install mysql5 pkg-get install php5 pkg-get install php5_mysql pkg-get install ap2_modphp5 I configured SSL support per this document: http://blogs.sun.com/jcecere/entry/building_64_bit_open_source3 Per instructions I read here, I also configured SSL support in SMF: # svccfg -s svc:/network/http:cswapache2 setprop httpd/ssl=true # svcadm refresh svc:/network/http:cswapache2 This appears to be set up correctly: # svcprop -p httpd/ssl svc:network/http:cswapache2 true # I also modified the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf to use the IP:443 rather than just 443 (after trying https with the default and it did not work). There is nothing I can see in the error logs that shows a problem: [Thu Apr 19 11:22:11 2007] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authent ication ... [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) PHP/5.2.1 configured -- resuming normal operations I can see when I do a netstat it still is not listening on 443. Regular http is working great, it is listening on 80 just fine. It is like it is not reading the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf. Just to test, I added a Listen directive for 443 in httpd.conf and then did a netstat - it started listening on 443: 172.18.100.161.80 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN 172.18.100.161.443 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN I am thinking that is is not reading httpd-ssl.conf at all. I have double and triple checked that I have the Include for httpd-ssl.conf uncommented in httpd.conf. Obviously I am missing something but I sure can't figure it out. I am hoping someone can please tell me what I am missing. Thanks very much Lauren. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lauren.wright at guamcell.net Thu Apr 19 08:04:25 2007 From: lauren.wright at guamcell.net (Lauren) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:04:25 +1000 Subject: [csw-users] SSL on Apache2 problem - Solaris 10 Message-ID: <058601c78248$95b91760$15c812ac@guamcell.com> Hi again, I got SSL working. Perhaps I am the only idiot out there who has not gotten this to work right away, but in case this can help someone else I will send what I did to the list. Here is what I missed - in httpd.conf the Include directive for SSL was inside the IfModule set like so: Include etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf SSLRandomSeed startup builtin SSLRandomSeed connect builtin I decided to try commenting it out and putting it outside of the set like so: Include etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf #Include etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf SSLRandomSeed startup builtin SSLRandomSeed connect builtin and I was rewarded with apache not starting and throwing the error that: [Thu Apr 19 14:43:20 2007] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart Syntax error on line 57 of /opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf: Invalid command 'SSLPassPhraseDialog', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration This was cool to me because that might mean it wasn't finding mod_ssl, so I checked that out and the mod_ssl was also inside a set: LoadModule ssl_module libexec/mod_ssl.so So I commented out the tags like so: # LoadModule ssl_module libexec/mod_ssl.so # and hey presto apache started, listening on 80 and 443. Thanks Lauren. -----Original Message----- From: Lauren [mailto:lauren.wright at guamcell.net] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:07 PM To: 'users at lists.blastwave.org' Subject: RE: SSL on Apache2 problem - Solaris 10 Hi all, I am having trouble getting Apache 2 to listen on port 443. I am running Solaris 10 (new to me). I installed the SAMP packages from blastwave in this order: pkg-get install apache2 pkg-get install mysql5 pkg-get install php5 pkg-get install php5_mysql pkg-get install ap2_modphp5 I configured SSL support per this document: http://blogs.sun.com/jcecere/entry/building_64_bit_open_source3 Per instructions I read here, I also configured SSL support in SMF: # svccfg -s svc:/network/http:cswapache2 setprop httpd/ssl=true # svcadm refresh svc:/network/http:cswapache2 This appears to be set up correctly: # svcprop -p httpd/ssl svc:network/http:cswapache2 true # I also modified the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf to use the IP:443 rather than just 443 (after trying https with the default and it did not work). There is nothing I can see in the error logs that shows a problem: [Thu Apr 19 11:22:11 2007] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authent ication ... [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Apr 19 11:22:12 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) PHP/5.2.1 configured -- resuming normal operations I can see when I do a netstat it still is not listening on 443. Regular http is working great, it is listening on 80 just fine. It is like it is not reading the Listen directive in httpd-ssl.conf. Just to test, I added a Listen directive for 443 in httpd.conf and then did a netstat - it started listening on 443: 172.18.100.161.80 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN 172.18.100.161.443 *.* 0 0 49152 0 LISTEN I am thinking that is is not reading httpd-ssl.conf at all. I have double and triple checked that I have the Include for httpd-ssl.conf uncommented in httpd.conf. Obviously I am missing something but I sure can't figure it out. I am hoping someone can please tell me what I am missing. Thanks very much Lauren. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Apr 19 10:32:29 2007 From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> Alex Moore wrote: > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. I recently noticed that nrpe is available but check_nrpe is not, although it is contained in the source archive for nrpe. I checked the README.* files but could not find any reason for this. ciao Klaus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Apr 19 10:58:35 2007 From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:58:35 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Package submission and maintainance Message-ID: <20070419085835.130000@gmx.net> Hi, is it acceptable to submit new packages without being willing/able to be the maintainer? We need several Perl packages not yet available and I hope I am allowed to give them back to the community. It will not be possible to be the official maintainer. ciao Klaus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Thu Apr 19 11:21:29 2007 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:21:29 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] Package submission and maintainance Message-ID: <11209257819.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> It is not possbile. The best thing would be to ask for the missing packages on the "packages request form" available here: http://www. blastwave.org/pkgreq.php ...and then hope someone willing to be the mantainer will take over them. ----Messaggio originale---- Da: khfp. blastwave0704 at gmx.de Data: 19-apr-2007 10.58 A: Ogg: [csw-users] Package submission and maintainance Hi, is it acceptable to submit new packages without being willing/able to be the maintainer? We need several Perl packages not yet available and I hope I am allowed to give them back to the community. It will not be possible to be the official maintainer. ciao Klaus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From brian.gupta at gmail.com Thu Apr 19 12:17:08 2007 From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:17:08 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> References: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> Message-ID: <5b5090780704190317p79c55ee9g6a369583ecd423c8@mail.gmail.com> Good "catch". In the future please contact the protagonist. On 4/19/07, khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de wrote: > Alex Moore wrote: > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages/CSWnagios > > and there are nagiosp (nagios-plugins), nrpe, nsca packages as well. > > I recently noticed that nrpe is available but check_nrpe is not, although > it is contained in the source archive for nrpe. > I checked the README.* files but could not find any reason for this. > > ciao > Klaus > -- > "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... > Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From asmoore at blastwave.org Thu Apr 19 12:40:15 2007 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:40:15 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> References: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20070419054015.000047a0@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:29 +0200 khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de wrote: > I recently noticed that nrpe is available but check_nrpe is not, > although it is contained in the source archive for nrpe. > I checked the README.* files but could not find any reason for this. check_nrpe is the server-side module. It was included in the original CSWnagios by the original package maintainer. Since it only works with a nagios server installation, I left it there when I took over the package. For your reference, you can get to this page from several places; but I use this to find files within blastwave packages. http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch.php Alex -- From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Apr 19 13:26:20 2007 From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:26:20 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070419054015.000047a0@sws602.mcsun.local> References: <20070419083229.50540@gmx.net> <20070419054015.000047a0@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <20070419112620.181760@gmx.net> Alex Moore wrote > check_nrpe is the server-side module. It was included in the original > CSWnagios by the original package maintainer. Since it only works > with a nagios server installation, I left it there when I took over the > package. I checked the nrpe and nagiosp packages for this and until I read your message I was sure I had checked /var/sadm/install/contents on the server before I wrote to the list... oh well. ciao Klaus Heinz -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Fri Apr 20 03:49:55 2007 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] CSW GNOME 2.16.3 for Solaris ... testing complete!!! In-Reply-To: <20070419112620.181760@gmx.net> Message-ID: <338307.29386.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hello, Thanks to the non-biased testing skills of Peter Felecan over at Blastwave.org whom assisted me in reviewing GNOME, we now have a production-grade version of GNOME 2.16.3 for Solaris 8/9/10 x86/SPARC and OpenSolaris distros (tested on OpenSolaris distro SXCE b35 (SPARC)and Solaris 10u3 (x86)). I made a valiant attempt to provide the some of the most recent GNOME apps and I've put GIMP 2.3.15 in the /testing area. We hope to have GNOME 2.16.3 available in the unstable area of the CSW mirrors by this weekend. Thanks to the many users that took the time to fill out bug reports and test the beta builds. I think you'll really like this port of GNOME - and there are more improvements on the way!!! ~ Ken Mays @ EarthLink, Inc. Blastwave.org GNOME 2.16.x/KDE maintainer __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From william at wbonnet.net Sun Apr 22 22:42:51 2007 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:42:51 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Xfce 4.4.1 is available Message-ID: <462BC8CB.6070706@wbonnet.net> Hi all I am pleased to announce after a long due time ... the first version of Xfce 4.4.1 packages. The package layout has been modified, a lot of new packages appeared. In order to reduce dependencies i have split several packages. A single package can become up to 4 new packages application libraries (lib* packages) headers (devel packages) documentation (doc packages This version is having a few known problems : On the packaging side, some "Incompatible" declaration are missing in the depend file. This is not (yet) an issue since you will have to remove existing xfce packages and install new ones by hand. This will be fixed in the next days On the application side, the sparc version of xfce4-panel has a major bug. It is segfaulting when the panels.xml config file contains a xfce4-menu declaration. Please be sure that this file does not contains a line like the following : < item name="xfce4-menu" id="42"/ > If it appears, but it in comment. The previous line should become You will be able to remove it when it will be fixed. Working on this... The file is stored in your $HOME under ~/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml, and in the installation /opt/csw/etc/xdg/xfce4/panel/panels.xml Please report any problems or improvement request. goodies like system load will follow after Xfce 4.4.1 will be submitted to unstable in 2 weeks if no major problem is reported. Regards William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From langley at med.unc.edu Wed Apr 25 22:33:36 2007 From: langley at med.unc.edu (Ken Langley) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:33:36 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] New python to stable? Message-ID: <462FBB20.1030501@med.unc.edu> I see that a new python (v.2.5) package is in testing. Is there a timeline for when it will be released to stable? Can my group help in the testing process? Thanks. -- Ken Langley Manager, Systems and Networking OIS/UNC School of Medicine From comand at blastwave.org Thu Apr 26 08:06:23 2007 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:06:23 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] New python to stable? In-Reply-To: <462FBB20.1030501@med.unc.edu> References: <462FBB20.1030501@med.unc.edu> Message-ID: On 4/25/07, Ken Langley wrote: > I see that a new python (v.2.5) package is in testing. Is there a > timeline for when it will be released to stable? Can my group help in > the testing process? Hi Ken, You are certainly welcome to assist with the testing. The outstanding issue is that any packages which have a binary dependency on python need to be updated. Now that focus has shifted away from the last stable release, more time is available to begin that process. Note that this is really only a concern if you use modules with a binary component (or packages that embed the Python interpreter). If you use pure python modules, you will continue to pick up blastwave installed modules in the 2.4 site-packages directory. HTH, Cory. From seriv at parkheights.dyndns.org Thu Apr 26 20:06:26 2007 From: seriv at parkheights.dyndns.org (Sergey) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:06:26 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions Message-ID: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> Hi everyone, I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages I'm using. These are mailserver related packages. I use dovecot, and I'm glad Blastwave has the newest version of this server. But I'd like to have pacage dovecot-devel and dovecot-sieve. Dovecot-devel should be build from the same sources as dovecot, but with 'enable-headers-install' option for ./configure. And then it will by possible to build against dovecot's headers and libraries dovecot cmu_sieve plugin. Also I'd like to see postfix with dovecot authentification support. Postfix has this support starting version 2.3, and Blastwave has 2.2.8, while already 2.4.1 released. Then I'd like to have packages dspam and squirrelmail, I will have them on by server in any case, but it would be better to prepare and make them for Blastwave repository. Also some packages, like CSWapache2, have errors, already reported in this mailing list, - may be there are some way to upload patches to bugzilla, or to get authorization to upload fixed packages with permission of the maintainer? I have filled up "CSW - Maintainer signup page" 2 days ago, and the message after submitting it promised reply within a few hours. Should I repeat this singup process, or I am rejected from being a csw maintainer? -- With best regards, Sergey Ivanov. From trygvis at inamo.no Fri Apr 27 00:12:43 2007 From: trygvis at inamo.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trygve_Laugst=F8l?=) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:12:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> Sergey wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long > time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages I'm > using. > These are mailserver related packages. I use dovecot, and I'm glad > Blastwave has the newest version of this server. > But I'd like to have pacage dovecot-devel and dovecot-sieve. > Dovecot-devel should be build from the same sources as dovecot, but with > 'enable-headers-install' option for ./configure. And then it will by > possible to build against dovecot's headers and libraries dovecot > cmu_sieve plugin. > Also I'd like to see postfix with dovecot authentification support. > Postfix has this support starting version 2.3, and Blastwave has 2.2.8, > while already 2.4.1 released. > Then I'd like to have packages dspam and squirrelmail, I will have them > on by server in any case, but it would be better to prepare and make > them for Blastwave repository. > Also some packages, like CSWapache2, have errors, already reported in > this mailing list, - may be there are some way to upload patches to > bugzilla, or to get authorization to upload fixed packages with > permission of the maintainer? > I have filled up "CSW - Maintainer signup page" 2 days ago, and the > message after submitting it promised reply within a few hours. Should I > repeat this singup process, or I am rejected from being a csw maintainer? I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider this as a ping :) -- Trygve From asmoore at blastwave.org Fri Apr 27 12:19:20 2007 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:19:20 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20070427051920.00002ba8@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:06:26 -0400 Sergey wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long > time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages > I'm using. Welcome Sergey, For packaging changes, you can file a bug report. See http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ On dovecot, I can make these changes; so you do not really need to file one for that package. If the other package maintainers do not reply here, please file a bug report. You should be hearing from someone on your request to be a maintainer. I know that we need maintainers and I have way too many packages. Some of these, I picked up because no one else stepped up. Dovecot is one those packages. Thanks, Alex From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Fri Apr 27 12:24:20 2007 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:24:20 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] new user questions Message-ID: <1123291e331.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> It's a quite slow process so you have to wait some days, then after - let's say 7 days - you don't get an answer, you could send a reminder to Dennis Clarke. Anyway even if you get rejected, you always get back an email with the response. Patience is the first pre-requisite for a good maintainer! ;) good luck alessio ----Messaggio originale---- Da: seriv at parkheights.dyndns.org Data: 26-apr-2007 20.06 A: Ogg: [csw-users] new user questions Hi everyone, I'm new to this list. I am using csw packages for solaris quite a long time. Now I want to became a maintainer and to upload some packages I'm using. These are mailserver related packages. I use dovecot, and I'm glad Blastwave has the newest version of this server. But I'd like to have pacage dovecot-devel and dovecot-sieve. Dovecot-devel should be build from the same sources as dovecot, but with 'enable-headers- install' option for ./configure. And then it will by possible to build against dovecot's headers and libraries dovecot cmu_sieve plugin. Also I'd like to see postfix with dovecot authentification support. Postfix has this support starting version 2.3, and Blastwave has 2.2.8, while already 2.4.1 released. Then I'd like to have packages dspam and squirrelmail, I will have them on by server in any case, but it would be better to prepare and make them for Blastwave repository. Also some packages, like CSWapache2, have errors, already reported in this mailing list, - may be there are some way to upload patches to bugzilla, or to get authorization to upload fixed packages with permission of the maintainer? I have filled up "CSW - Maintainer signup page" 2 days ago, and the message after submitting it promised reply within a few hours. Should I repeat this singup process, or I am rejected from being a csw maintainer? -- With best regards, Sergey Ivanov. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Apr 27 22:34:22 2007 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:34:22 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <1123291e331.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <1123291e331.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: On 4/27/07, Alessio Cervellin wrote: > It's a quite slow process so you have to wait some days, then after - > let's say 7 days - you don't get an answer, you could send a reminder > to Dennis Clarke. > Anyway even if you get rejected, you always get back > an email with the response. > > Patience is the first pre-requisite for a > good maintainer! ;) > > good luck > alessio > I have been somewhat swamped over the past week. The weekend isn't looking any better but the task queue is back to a LIFO stack as opposed to FILO. Worse .. sometimes things degrade to FIST stacks : First In and Stuck There. Dennis From jdp at syntelos.com Sat Apr 28 22:53:19 2007 From: jdp at syntelos.com (John Pritchard) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:53:19 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] ?help with ft2 related build problem? Message-ID: Hi, trying to build inkscape on a fairly clean 2.11 sparc system.. - usr/local is empty - just a solaris-express install 'snv_55b', not built from srcs - latest CSW catalog + packages as of this afternoon subject to dependencies, i was able to successfully configure inkscape-0.39with the following environment.. (latest that would configure with CSW dependents, current would be inkscape-0.45.1)... export CFLAGS='-mcpu=v9' export CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/bash' export LDFLAGS='-L/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib -L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' export CPPFLAGS='-I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include' export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig: /usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/sfw/lib/pkgconfig (generic) but got hung up with this.. looks weird.. (of course the file is there, yes).. [[i think others would be quick to sort this out]] jdp at mizar (inkscape-0.39) $ make make all-recursive Making all in src if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/opt/csw/include/gtk-2.0-I/opt/csw/lib/gtk- 2.0/include -I/opt/csw/include/atk-1.0 -I/opt/csw/include/cairo -I/opt/csw/include/pango-1.0 -I/opt/csw/include/glib-2.0-I/opt/csw/lib/glib- 2.0/include -I/opt/csw/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/opt/csw/include/sigc++-1.2-I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused-parameter -g -O2 -MT sp-chars.o-MD -MP -MF ".deps/sp- chars.Tpo" \ -c -o sp-chars.o `test -f 'sp-chars.cpp' || echo './'`sp-chars.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/sp-chars.Tpo" ".deps/sp-chars.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/sp-chars.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from ./libnrtype/font-instance.h:10, from sp-chars.cpp:26: /opt/csw/include/ft2build.h:56:38: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or directory In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: ./libnrtype/font-instance.h:11:11: #include expects "FILENAME" or In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: ./libnrtype/font-instance.h:45: error: `FT_Face' does not name a type In file included from style.h:18, from sp-chars.cpp:31: sp-marker.h: In member function `SPMarker* SPMarkerReference::getObject() const': sp-marker.h:94: warning: cast from `SPObject*' to `SPMarker*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_release(SPObject*)': sp-chars.cpp:101: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_modified(SPObject*, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:121: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp:128: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_bbox(SPItem*, NRRect*, const NR::Matrix&, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:137: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `NRArenaItem* sp_chars_show(SPItem*, NRArena*, unsigned int, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:156: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_clear(SPChars*)': sp-chars.cpp:177: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_add_element(SPChars*, guint, font_instance*, const NRMatrix*)': sp-chars.cpp:206: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_set_paintbox(SPChars*, NRRect*)': sp-chars.cpp:306: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `sp-chars.o' $ pkg-get -c freetype2 software localrev remoterev freetype2 2.1.10,REV=2005.12.11 SAME Thanks, .j.. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ihsan at blastwave.org Sun Apr 29 00:43:54 2007 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:43:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> Message-ID: <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> Hello, on 27.04.2007 00:12 Trygve Laugst?l said the following: > I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman > package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. > > Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider > this as a ping :) You can also signup here: http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ http://gallery.dogan.ch/ http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Sun Apr 29 13:15:55 2007 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:15:55 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] ?help with ft2 related build problem? Message-ID: <1123d0dd3b0.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> try to set CFLAGS this way: epoxrt CFLAGS="$CFLAGS - I/opt/csw/include/freetype2" then run "configure" again, and then build... ----Messaggio originale---- Da: jdp at syntelos.com Data: 28- apr-2007 22.53 A: "blastwave users" Ogg: [csw-users] ?help with ft2 related build problem? Hi, trying to build inkscape on a fairly clean 2.11 sparc system.. - usr/local is empty - just a solaris-express install 'snv_55b', not built from srcs - latest CSW catalog + packages as of this afternoon subject to dependencies, i was able to successfully configure inkscape-0.39with the following environment.. (latest that would configure with CSW dependents, current would be inkscape-0.45.1)... export CFLAGS='- mcpu=v9' export CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/bash' export LDFLAGS='-L/lib - L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib - L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' export CPPFLAGS='-I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include - I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include - I/usr/sfw/include' export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig: /usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/sfw/lib/pkgconfig (generic) but got hung up with this.. looks weird.. (of course the file is there, yes).. [[i think others would be quick to sort this out]] jdp at mizar (inkscape- 0.39) $ make make all-recursive Making all in src if g++ - DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/opt/csw/include/gtk-2.0- I/opt/csw/lib/gtk- 2.0/include -I/opt/csw/include/atk-1.0 - I/opt/csw/include/cairo -I/opt/csw/include/pango-1.0 - I/opt/csw/include/glib-2.0-I/opt/csw/lib/glib- 2.0/include - I/opt/csw/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/opt/csw/include/sigc++-1.2- I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/X11/include - I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include - I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith - Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused- parameter -g -O2 -MT sp-chars.o-MD -MP -MF ".deps/sp- chars.Tpo" \ -c -o sp-chars.o `test -f 'sp-chars.cpp' || echo './'`sp-chars.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/sp-chars.Tpo" ".deps/sp-chars.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/sp- chars.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from ./libnrtype/font- instance.h:10, from sp-chars.cpp:26: /opt/csw/include/ft2build.h:56:38: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or directory In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: . /libnrtype/font-instance.h:11:11: #include expects "FILENAME" or In file included from sp-chars.cpp:26: ./libnrtype/font- instance.h:45: error: `FT_Face' does not name a type In file included from style.h:18, from sp-chars.cpp:31: sp-marker.h: In member function `SPMarker* SPMarkerReference::getObject() const': sp- marker.h:94: warning: cast from `SPObject*' to `SPMarker*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_release(SPObject*)': sp-chars.cpp:101: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_modified(SPObject*, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:121: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: 128: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_bbox(SPItem*, NRRect*, const NR::Matrix&, unsigned int)': sp- chars.cpp:137: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `NRArenaItem* sp_chars_show(SPItem*, NRArena*, unsigned int, unsigned int)': sp-chars.cpp:156: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPChars*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_clear(SPChars*)': sp-chars.cpp:177: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_add_element (SPChars*, guint, font_instance*, const NRMatrix*)': sp-chars.cpp:206: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type sp-chars.cpp: In function `void sp_chars_set_paintbox(SPChars*, NRRect*)': sp-chars.cpp:306: warning: cast from `GTypeInstance*' to `SPItem*' increases required alignment of target type *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `sp-chars.o' $ pkg-get -c freetype2 software localrev remoterev freetype2 2.1.10,REV=2005.12.11 SAME Thanks, .j.. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From trygvis at inamo.no Sun Apr 29 17:06:31 2007 From: trygvis at inamo.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trygve_Laugst=F8l?=) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:06:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <4634B477.6020907@inamo.no> Ihsan Dogan wrote: > Hello, > > on 27.04.2007 00:12 Trygve Laugst?l said the following: > >> I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman >> package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. >> >> Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider >> this as a ping :) > > You can also signup here: http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php As I said, I have already signed up but haven't gotten any feedback yet. No rush, but I would like to get my package into the Blastwave system soon. -- Trygve From blastwave at gmail.com Sun Apr 29 19:16:43 2007 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:16:43 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] new user questions In-Reply-To: <4634B477.6020907@inamo.no> References: <4630EA22.6090504@parkheights.dyndns.org> <463123DB.5010605@inamo.no> <4633CE2A.40704@blastwave.org> <4634B477.6020907@inamo.no> Message-ID: I'll try to figure out what the delay is ... On 4/29/07, Trygve Laugst?l wrote: > Ihsan Dogan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > on 27.04.2007 00:12 Trygve Laugst?l said the following: > > > >> I have the same question. I signed up to upload and maintain the mailman > >> package over a week ago but haven't gotten any feedback. > >> > >> Dennis Clarke told me on #opensolaris to ping him directly so consider > >> this as a ping :) > > > > You can also signup here: http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php > > As I said, I have already signed up but haven't gotten any feedback yet. > > No rush, but I would like to get my package into the Blastwave system soon. > > -- > Trygve > -- --- Dennis Clarke From jdp at syntelos.com Mon Apr 30 04:22:13 2007 From: jdp at syntelos.com (John Pritchard) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:22:13 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] ?help with build (inkscape) problem? solaris-2.11 sparc Message-ID: Hi.. Many thanks to Alessio for helping with this in the previous iteration. building inkscape-0.39 on snv_55b (solaris-2.11 sparc, solaris-express, not built from sources)... using /usr/sfw/bin/gcc [3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802)], CSS LD, latest CSW, plain vanilla environment... everything looks like it should be working fine, but i get link errors for libsigc++ (and some weird stuff comes from where?) mkdir .libs g++ -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch -Wno-unused-parameter -g -O2 -o inkscape --export-dynamic main.o -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib -L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib libinkpre.a dialogs/libspdialogs.a xml/libspxml.a svg/libspsvg.a widgets/libspwidgets.a display/libspdisplay.a helper/libspchelp.a libnrtype/libnrtype.a libnr/libnr.a livarot/libvarot.a extension/libextension.a extension/implementation/libimplementation.a extension/internal/libinternal.a inkjar/libinkjar.a libinkpost.a/opt/csw/lib/libgtk- x11-2.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libatk-1.0.so -L/export/medusa/kenmays/build/glib-2.10.2/cswstage/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/studio/SOS8/SUNWspro/prod/lib /opt/csw/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -L/export/medusa/kenmays/build/v8_croco/libcroco-0.6.1/cswstage/opt/csw/lib/opt/csw/lib/libpangocairo- 1.0.so -L/opt/build/michael/xrender-0.8.3-buildroot/opt/csw/lib/opt/csw/lib/libcairo.so -lSM -lICE -lxml2 -lpthread -lsocket -lnsl /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so /opt/csw/lib/libpng12.so -lpopt /opt/csw/lib/libXft.so /opt/csw/lib/libXrender.so -lX11 /opt/csw/lib/libfontconfig.so /opt/csw/lib/libexpat.so /opt/csw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lsunmath /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /opt/csw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so -lm /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so /opt/csw/lib/libiconv.so -lc /opt/csw/lib/libfreetype.so -lz -Wl,-R -Wl,/opt/csw/lib -Wl,-R -Wl,/opt/csw/lib -Wl,-R -Wl,/usr/openwin/lib Undefined first referenced symbol in file SigC::AdaptorBindSlotNode::AdaptorBindSlotNode(void (*)(void*), SigC::Node const&, void (*)(void*))libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) __1cG__CrunKpure_error6F_v_ /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so SigC::ObjectSlotNode::init(SigC::Object*, void*, void (SigC::Object::*)())libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::ObjectBase::reference() const libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::ObjectBase::unreference() constlibinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) virtual thunk to SigC::Object::~Object()libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) virtual thunk to SigC::Object::~Object()libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::Object::Object() libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::Object::~Object() libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::Object::~Object() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::Object::~Object() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::SignalBase::impl() const libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SlotNode::SlotNode(void (*)(void*))libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) vtable for SigC::ObjectSlotNode libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::Connection::disconnect() libinkpre.a(sp-offset.o) SigC::SignalNode::empty() libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::ObjectBase::set_manage() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::SignalNode::push_back(SigC::SlotBase const&)libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SignalNode::cleanup() libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SlotNode::~SlotNode() libinkpre.a(uri-references.o) SigC::SignalBase::SignalBase(SigC::SignalBase const&)libinkpre.a( sp-gradient.o) typeinfo for SigC::Object libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::ObjectBase::~ObjectBase() libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) __1cG__CrunMex_rethrow_q6F_v_ /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so SigC::FuncSlotNode::FuncSlotNode(void (*)(void*), void (*)(void*))libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) SigC::Node::assign(SigC::NodeBase*) libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::Node::operator=(SigC::Node const&)libinkpre.a(sp-offset.o) SigC::SignalBase::~SignalBase() libinkpre.a(document.o) SigC::SignalBase::SignalBase() libinkpre.a(document.o) vtable for SigC::ObjectBase libinkpre.a(sp-gradient.o) c::c(n6, (int0_t)) /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so SigC::Node::clear() const libinkpre.a(document.o) __1c2k6Fpv_v_ /opt/csw/lib/libsigc-1.2.so ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to inkscape collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `inkscape' to reproduce this, my environment.. PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/java/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/dt/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ucb CFLAGS='-mcpu=v9' CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/bash' LDFLAGS='-L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/dt/lib -L/usr/java/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' CPPFLAGS='-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include' PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/sfw/lib/pkgconfig and one patch to inkscape-0.39/src/main.cpp line 239, s/fpresetsticky/fpsetsticky/ for /usr/include/ieeefp.h otherwise ./configure && make (maybe the configure script is just wrong wrt the version of libsigc++ it's accepting). thoughts, comments, suggestions? many thanks, john -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james at blastwave.org Mon Apr 30 09:18:19 2007 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:18:19 GMT Subject: [csw-users] ?help with build (inkscape) problem? solaris-2.11 sparc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070430.7181900.3216354088@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 30/04/07, 03:22:13, John Pritchard wrote regarding [csw-users] ?help with build (inkscape) problem? solaris-2.11 sparc: > using /usr/sfw/bin/gcc [3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802)], CSS LD, latest > CSW, plain vanilla environment... > everything looks like it should be working fine, but i get link errors > for libsigc++ (and some weird stuff comes from where?) libsigc++ was built with CC and you are compiling with g++. If an API is pure C (it's not here) you might need to add Sun's libCrun and/or libCstd. For example in your list: $ dem __1cG__CrunKpure_error6F_v_ __1cG__CrunKpure_error6F_v_ == void __Crun::pure_error() that one is found in Crun. The ones from libinkpre.a are just mangled wrongly for the 2 compiler types. James. From william at wbonnet.net Mon Apr 30 12:01:47 2007 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:01:47 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-newpkgs] weekly package summary In-Reply-To: <20070430040103.GA22606@blastwave.org> References: <20070430040103.GA22606@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <4635BE8B.9090501@wbonnet.net> Hi Philip > Attached is the summary of changed or added packages for the last week > I see that jboss has been updated, is the maintainer still active ? I ask a few time on the list and had no answers. Regards -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group