From Corey.Hart at synopsys.com  Thu Mar  1 00:53:43 2007
From: Corey.Hart at synopsys.com (Corey Hart)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:53:43 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
In-Reply-To: <20070227230421.96b8bade.adeason2@uiuc.edu>
References: <20070227230421.96b8bade.adeason2@uiuc.edu>
Message-ID: <1F64EB1FF8A50D429407320DED1A77B7059B63D5@US01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com>

For the bourne shell:

pkg-get -f -i <package> > /dev/null 2>&1 

...corey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org
> [mailto:users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Deason
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:04 PM
> To: users at lists.blastwave.org
> Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
> 
> Is there any way to suppress the exorbitant amount of output blastwave
> outputs when installing a package? I recently was trying an automated
> Solaris 10 install system we have set up, and one of the automated
> post-install steps was to install blastwave and several packages from
> it. However, I was doing this over a serial link, and since several
> packages output the entire GPL and LGPL when installing, it took quite
> a bit of time (longer than the entire rest of the install, as I
recall).
> 
> Are there any options to make pkg-get quieter (or the underlying
> pkgadd invocations), or at least to not display the licenses?
> 
> --
> Andrew Deason
> adeason2 at uiuc.edu



From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Thu Mar  1 03:06:32 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] gnome 2.14 problem in unstable branch
In-Reply-To: <1172632378.3971.35.camel@zebra>
Message-ID: <520678.87438.qm@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


Hello,

You are not using the latest packages which fixes the
old issues:

Use the packages in www.blastwave.org/testing to
updated your UNSTABLE/STABLE snapshot of GNOME.

Current: GNOME 2.16.3
 
~Ken


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather


From adeason2 at uiuc.edu  Thu Mar  1 07:31:47 2007
From: adeason2 at uiuc.edu (Andrew Deason)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:31:47 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
In-Reply-To: <1F64EB1FF8A50D429407320DED1A77B7059B63D5@US01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com>
References: <20070227230421.96b8bade.adeason2@uiuc.edu>
	<1F64EB1FF8A50D429407320DED1A77B7059B63D5@US01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com>
Message-ID: <20070301003147.6e4b7680.adeason2@uiuc.edu>

I was hoping more for a method of getting some kind of status, with
most output suppressed. This could be achieved with some scripting, as
well, but I was just wondering if there's any kind of solution within
pkg-get, as that would be a lot easier. If not, then... I'll deal.

--
Andrew Deason
adeason2 at uiuc.edu

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:53:43 -0800
"Corey Hart" <Corey.Hart at synopsys.com> wrote:

> For the bourne shell:
>
> pkg-get -f -i <package> > /dev/null 2>&1
>
> ...corey
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org
> > [mailto:users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org]
> > On Behalf Of Andrew Deason
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:04 PM
> > To: users at lists.blastwave.org
> > Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
> >
> > Is there any way to suppress the exorbitant amount of output
> > blastwave outputs when installing a package? I recently was trying
> > an automated Solaris 10 install system we have set up, and one of
> > the automated post-install steps was to install blastwave and
> > several packages from it. However, I was doing this over a serial
> > link, and since several packages output the entire GPL and LGPL
> > when installing, it took quite a bit of time (longer than the
> > entire rest of the install, as I
> recall).
> >
> > Are there any options to make pkg-get quieter (or the underlying
> > pkgadd invocations), or at least to not display the licenses?
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Deason
> > adeason2 at uiuc.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070301/4472abe2/attachment.bin 

From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Sun Mar  4 01:40:35 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:40:35 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>

I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" command
seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
without problems.

The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?

Thanks!
Paul Youngblood



From comand at blastwave.org  Sun Mar  4 06:44:51 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:44:51 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
> to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
> Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" command
> seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
> without problems.
>
> The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
> it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
> via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?

Hi Paul,

If you're running Solaris 10, cswapache2 won't be installed, and you
can use svcadm to manage the cswapache2 service.

HTH,
Cory.


From comand at blastwave.org  Sun Mar  4 06:47:37 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:47:37 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/3/07, Cory Omand <comand at blastwave.org> wrote:
> On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> > I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
> > to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
> > Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" commandO
> > seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
> > without problems.
> >
> > The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
> > it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
> > via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> If you're running Solaris 10, cswapache2 won't be installed, and you
> can use svcadm to manage the cswapache2 service.
>

Apologies -- just re-read your message, and saw that you're actually
running Solaris 9.  There is no reason why cswapache2 wouldn't be
there... I verified that it's part of the package, as installed on our
build servers:

bash$ pkginfo -x CSWapache2 CSWapache2c
CSWapache2            apache2 - Apache 2.2 web server
                      (all) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
                      (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
bash$
bash$ pkgchk -l -p /etc/init.d/cswapache2
Pathname: /etc/init.d/cswapache2
Type: editted file
Expected mode: 0755
Expected owner: root
Expected group: bin
Referenced by the following packages:
        CSWapache2c
Current status: installed

- C.


From mametller at gmail.com  Sun Mar  4 15:54:53 2007
From: mametller at gmail.com (Marcelo)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:54:53 -0300
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <141ad5a60703040654l7ebe2edeq36ab484cc123a56d@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
> to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
> Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" command
> seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
> without problems.
>
> The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
> it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
> via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?
>

Are you sure it's a CSW (Blastware) package ?
or it's a default SUN package ?

In csw package, the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 is in the package: "apache2c"

-- 
Marcelo
http://maramsis.blogspot.com


From zizban at adelphia.net  Sun Mar  4 18:42:35 2007
From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:42:35 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] fvwm2 questions
Message-ID: <50EFE67B-FC2A-4E85-B8FD-4BC9DDB9E98F@adelphia.net>

Where does the .fvwmrc go? I tried putting it in ~ and ~/.fvwm/ but  
to no avail

And where do themes go?

thanks


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Sun Mar  4 23:58:46 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:58:46 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>

Thank you very much for the information and help Cory.  I must
have somehow deleted my /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.

When I run the commands you illustrated:
     bash$ pkginfo -x CSWapache2 CSWapache2c
     bash$ pkgchk -l -p /etc/init.d/cswapache2
I get the exact same output you did.  Do you know if there
is a way to "start over" and do a fresh install?  In an
effort to do just that, I used "pkg-get -r" to successfully
remove ap2_prefork, apache2rt, and apache2.  But I get the
following in attempting removal apache2c:

    bsh# pkg-get -r apache2c
    WARNING:  the remove option is not very intelligent.
    If there are multiple versions of a package with the same
    PKG style name, it will remove the first one it can
    (will continue in 5 seconds)
    Starting remove operations now...

    The following package is currently installed:
       CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
                             (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19

    Do you want to remove this package? [y,n,?,q] y

    ## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
    (A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
    ## Processing package information.
    ## Executing preremove script.
    chroot: No such file or directory
    pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully

    Removal of <CSWapache2c> failed.
    bsh#

I'd be greatful for any direction you might provide.
Paul Youngblood

-----------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Cory Omand wrote:

> On 3/3/07, Cory Omand <comand at blastwave.org> wrote:
>> On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
>>> I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
>>> to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
>>> Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" commandO
>>> seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
>>> without problems. 
>>>
>>> The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
>>> it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
>>> via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> If you're running Solaris 10, cswapache2 won't be installed, and you
>> can use svcadm to manage the cswapache2 service.
>>
>
> Apologies -- just re-read your message, and saw that you're actually
> running Solaris 9.  There is no reason why cswapache2 wouldn't be
> there... I verified that it's part of the package, as installed on our
> build servers:
>
> bash$ pkginfo -x CSWapache2 CSWapache2c
> CSWapache2            apache2 - Apache 2.2 web server
>                      (all) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
> CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
>                      (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
> bash$
> bash$ pkgchk -l -p /etc/init.d/cswapache2
> Pathname: /etc/init.d/cswapache2
> Type: editted file
> Expected mode: 0755
> Expected owner: root
> Expected group: bin
> Referenced by the following packages:
>        CSWapache2c
> Current status: installed
>
> - C.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From comand at blastwave.org  Mon Mar  5 03:21:35 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:21:35 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> effort to do just that, I used "pkg-get -r" to successfully
> remove ap2_prefork, apache2rt, and apache2.  But I get the
> following in attempting removal apache2c:
[...]
>     ## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
>     (A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
>     ## Processing package information.
>     ## Executing preremove script.
>     chroot: No such file or directory
>     pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully

Well, it's strange for chroot to not be on your system somewhere...
usually /usr/sbin/chroot, part of SUNWcsu (core solaris)...  You might
check that it's actually installed.  If it's not there, then your
system is very inconsistent.

- C.


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Mon Mar  5 04:27:04 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:27:04 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>

Running pkgchk on SUNWcsu indicates nothing wrong on my system.
I think that /usr/sbin/chroot is complaining that I don't have
the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.  Here is what I get when I
use the pkgrm command directly:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
bsh# pkgrm -v CSWapache2c
The following package is currently installed:
    CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
                          (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
Do you want to remove this package? [y,n,?,q] y
## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
(A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user
permission during the process of removing this package.
Do you want to continue with the removal of this package [y,n,?,q] y
## Verifying package dependencies.
## Processing package information.
## Executing preremove script.
+ [ -z  ]
PKG_INSTALL_ROOT=/
STATE_FILE=//var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ rm -f //var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ [ -f //usr/sbin/svccfg -a -f //usr/sbin/svcadm ]
+ chroot / /etc/init.d/cswapache2 stop                    <-----<<<<<
chroot: No such file or directory                         <-----<<<<<
pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

But when I copy an arbitrary text file to /etc/init.d/cswapache2
and give it proper owner, group, and permissions as indicated in
this listing ...

bsh# ls -l /etc/init.d | grep csw
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     bin         3712 Mar  4 21:09 cswapache2
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin          678 Nov  4  2005 cswfconfig
-rwxr-xr-x   6 root     bin         6539 Mar  1 21:24 cswmysql
-rwxr-xr-x   6 root     bin         6545 Mar  1 21:46 cswmysql5
-rwxr-xr-x   6 root     bin         5411 Mar  1 21:23 cswopenldap
bsh#

... and then run "pkgrm -v CSWapache2c" again, I get this:

## Verifying package dependencies.
## Processing package information.
## Executing preremove script.
+ [ -z  ]
PKG_INSTALL_ROOT=/
STATE_FILE=//var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ rm -f //var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ [ -f //usr/sbin/svccfg -a -f //usr/sbin/svcadm ]
+ chroot / /etc/init.d/cswapache2 stop
chroot: Exec format error
pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully
Removal of <CSWapache2c> failed.
------------------------------------------------------------



On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Cory Omand wrote:

> On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
>> effort to do just that, I used "pkg-get -r" to successfully
>> remove ap2_prefork, apache2rt, and apache2.  But I get the
>> following in attempting removal apache2c:
> [...]
>>     ## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
>>     (A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
>>     ## Processing package information.
>>     ## Executing preremove script.
>>     chroot: No such file or directory
>>     pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully
>
> Well, it's strange for chroot to not be on your system somewhere...
> usually /usr/sbin/chroot, part of SUNWcsu (core solaris)...  You might
> check that it's actually installed.  If it's not there, then your
> system is very inconsistent.
>
> - C.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From comand at blastwave.org  Mon Mar  5 05:43:14 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:43:14 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> Running pkgchk on SUNWcsu indicates nothing wrong on my system.
> I think that /usr/sbin/chroot is complaining that I don't have
> the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.  Here is what I get when I
> use the pkgrm command directly:

Ok, now I see.  If you add #!/bin/sh or something similar to the top
of your empty cswapache2 file, and make it executable, it should allow
you to remove the package.

- C.


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Mon Mar  5 21:55:37 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:55:37 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>

Hi Cory,

Yes, putting "#!/bin/sh" at the top of the text file worked
perfectly, thank you!   This  means all of these CSW packages
have been removed: apache2c, apache2rt, apache2, and ap2prefork.
However, I still had to manually remove the "bogus" text file
"/etc/init.d/cswapache2" and the symbolic links to it in the
/etc directories rc0.d, rc1.d, rc2.d, rc3.d, and rcS.d.

Finally, to start all over, I ran "pkg-get install apache2" which
installed ap2prefork, apache2rt, and apache2, but could only
partially install apache2c.  Here is the error (which you can see in
proper context in the abbreviated screen output log which follows:

ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
        pathname does not exist.

I'm not sure what this means.  Why won't the install of apache2c
create cswapache2 in /etc/init.d?   The directory certainly exists
and the install re-created all the symbolic links, but these links
point to a file which is not there:

bsh# ls -ld /etc/init.d
drwxr-xr-x   2 root     sys         2048 Mar  5 12:26 /etc/init.d
bsh# ls -oR /etc | grep cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 S50cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
bsh#


Thank you for all your help on this, Cory.  I appologize for taking
up your time.
Paul Youngblood


=========== Begin abbreviated output log ====================
bsh# pkg-get install apache2
No existing install of CSWapache2 found. Installing...
Trying ftp://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/sparc/5.9/
                      apache2-2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Analysing special files...
Trying to install dependancy apache2c
No existing install of CSWapache2c found. Installing...
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Analysing special files...
Hmmm. Retrying with different archive offset...4217 blocks
Trying to install dependancy apache2rt
No existing install of CSWapache2rt found. Installing...
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installation of <CSWapache2rt> was successful.
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installing apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core) as <CSWapache2c>
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.gif
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.png
[ verifying class <none> ]
/etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
[ verifying class <init> ]
ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed  <--<<<<
     pathname does not exist                                       <--<<<<
## Executing postinstall script.
Checking configuration files:
Creating /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf from template
Creating /opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf from template
Copying CSW templates:
   creating /opt/csw/apache2/share/htdocs/index.html
<><><> skipped lines <><><>
   creating /opt/csw/apache2/etc/mime.types

Installation of <CSWapache2c> partially failed.                   <--<<<<
ERROR: could not add CSWapache2c.                                 <--<<<<
Trying to install dependancy ap2_prefork
No existing install of CSWap2prefork found. Installing...
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installation of <CSWap2prefork> was successful.
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installation of <CSWapache2> was successful.
bsh#
==============================================================

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Cory Omand wrote:

> On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
>> Running pkgchk on SUNWcsu indicates nothing wrong on my system.
>> I think that /usr/sbin/chroot is complaining that I don't have
>> the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.  Here is what I get when I
>> use the pkgrm command directly:
>
> Ok, now I see.  If you add #!/bin/sh or something similar to the top
> of your empty cswapache2 file, and make it executable, it should allow
> you to remove the package.
>
> - C.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From comand at blastwave.org  Tue Mar  6 06:16:30 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:16:30 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/5/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
>         pathname does not exist.

It appears that you have somehow confused your system's package
database.  This can be (very carefully, as root) corrected by hand, by
first removing all of the apache2 packages.  Then, remove lines which
refer to cswapache2 (as well as any CSWapache2*/CSWap2* packages) from
/var/sadm/install/contents.  Finally, ensure that no
CSWapache2*/CSWap2* directories remain in /var/sadm/pkg.  Once that's
all done, you should be able to re-add the packages.  I'm not sure how
you got where you are today, but it's certainly not standard operating
procedure :).

- C.


From pfelecan at blastwave.org  Tue Mar  6 14:41:55 2007
From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:41:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Emacs 22 snapshot 20070301 CVS
Message-ID: <x6odn6biak.fsf@abhavana.free.fr>

The monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, is in the
testing area:

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.95,REV=cvs20070301-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.95,REV=cvs20070301-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But,
if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the
packaging side.

To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and
Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the
CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user,
the nifty AucTex package.

Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and
emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously
separate, packages --- e.g., tramp.

I'll made a new testing package the next month.

Enjoy
-- 
Peter


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Thu Mar  8 22:28:13 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:28:13 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>


> It appears that you have somehow confused your system's package
> database.  This can be (very carefully, as root) corrected by hand, by
> first removing all of the apache2 packages.  Then, remove lines which
> refer to cswapache2 (as well as any CSWapache2*/CSWap2* packages) from
> /var/sadm/install/contents.  Finally, ensure that no
> CSWapache2*/CSWap2* directories remain in /var/sadm/pkg.  Once that's
> all done, you should be able to re-add the packages.  I'm not sure how

Cory, I'm still unable to get the apache2c install to create
the "/etc/init.d/cswapache2" file, and I've tried more than once
using the procedure you were kind enough to provide.  I removed all
of the CSWapache2* and CSWap2* packages using pkgrm, and checked the
/var/sadm/install/contents file -- there were no references left
to any CSWapache2* or CSWap2* packages.  I edited the file anyway
and removed the two comment lines at the bottom which referenced
the CSWapache2c package.  Also, got rid of any CSWapache2* and
CSWap2* dirs in /var/sadm/pkg, and removed the /etc/initd.cswapache2
file (the bogus one that must be in place to successfully do the
"pkgrm CSWapache2c" command) and all symbolic links to it in the
/etc/rc*.d directories.  Then I did a fresh install of CSWapache2rt
followed by CSWapache2c.  The result appeared to be the same as before.

Should I have rebooted the system immediately prior to re-installation?
Maybe there is a memory buffer somewhere that confuses the installation.

Is it possible that some other package catalog/repository file (either
blastwave or solaris) exists with incorrect information in it?

Should I try removing even more of the blastwave packages next time
(like CSWcommon) in order to start with a "cleaner" slate?

I noticed that when I do a "pkg-get install CSWapache" and compare its
output to that of the CSWapache2c install (see below),  the CSWapache
install seems to indicate the creation of a /etc/init.d/cswapache file
and its links immediately after the "## Installing part 1 of 1." line.
But the CSWapache2c install shows no reference to the cswapache2 file
until after the line "[ verifying class <none> ]", and even then only
mentions the links themselves, not the file.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
First, this is from the cswapache install:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

bsh# pkg-get install apache
No existing install of CSWapache found. Installing...
...   ...   ...
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
    4 package pathnames are already properly installed.

Installing apache - apache webserver with mod_ssl included as <CSWapache>

## Installing part 1 of 1.                         <-----<<<
/etc/init.d/cswapache                              <-----<<<
/etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>            <-----<<<
/etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>
/etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>
/etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache <symbolic link>
/etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>
/opt/csw/apache/bin/ab
/opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl
/opt/csw/apache/bin/apxs


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is from the cswapache2c install:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

bsh# pkg-get install apache2c
No existing install of CSWapache2c found. Installing...
...   ...   ...
## Executing checkinstall script.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
    15 package pathnames are already properly installed.

Installing apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core) as <CSWapache2c>

## Installing part 1 of 1.
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-dav.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-default.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-info.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-languages.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf.CSW
...   ...   ...
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world1.png
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.gif
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.png
[ verifying class <none> ]                      <-----<<<
/etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>        <-----<<<
/etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
[ verifying class <init> ]
ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
     pathname does not exist



Paul Youngblood



From james at blastwave.org  Thu Mar  8 23:14:44 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:14:44 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <20070308.22144400.1746965301@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 08/03/07, 21:28:13, Paul "N." Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote 
regarding Re: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file:

> Cory, I'm still unable to get the apache2c install to create
> the "/etc/init.d/cswapache2" file, and I've tried more than once

Paul, I confirm your error, I too cannot install CSWapache2.  It's
late now, I'll do an investigation in the morning and see if I can
find out why.



> /etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> [ verifying class <init> ]
> ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
>      pathname does not exist

Yes, the same error for me.




James.


From comand at blastwave.org  Thu Mar  8 23:57:49 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:57:49 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703081457v73ba48ddiacf1eae0a90726f5@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/8/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> [ verifying class <none> ]                      <-----<<<
> /etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>        <-----<<<
> /etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>

This is most certainly a bug, one which may have been hiding due to
another bug.  I am rebuilding right now, to see if I can find out what
is really happening here...  I'll follow with details as soon as I
figure out what's wrong.

- C.


From james at blastwave.org  Fri Mar  9 11:30:33 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:30:33 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <20070308.22144400.1746965301@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
	<20070308.22144400.1746965301@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20070309.10303300.505232199@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 08/03/07, 22:14:44, James Lee <james at blastwave.org> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file:

> > Cory, I'm still unable to get the apache2c install to create
> > the "/etc/init.d/cswapache2" file, and I've tried more than once

> Paul, I confirm your error, I too cannot install CSWapache2.  It's
> late now, I'll do an investigation in the morning and see if I can
> find out why.

Good morning all, the problem is with i.init.  cswapache2 has pkgmap
entry: 

1 e init /etc/init.d/cswapache2 0755 root bin 807 59067 1171862731

The 'e' mean the file in the package is an editable script used for
building the installed file, the file is being fed to the init class
action scipt but is failing.  Yann, this is your script, perhaps you
will look at this problem.


On removal preremove fails and baulks pkgrm because it returns non-zero.
Add "exit 0" to the end of /var/sadm/pkg/CSWapache2c/install/preremove
to allow pkgrm to run:

# echo "exit 0" >> /var/sadm/pkg/CSWapache2c/install/preremove




James.



From deluca at med.unc.edu  Fri Mar  9 20:31:26 2007
From: deluca at med.unc.edu (Tony DeLuca)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:31:26 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] updated python packates
Message-ID: <45F1B60E.3000607@med.unc.edu>

Hi All,
Does anyone know the status for the new version of python (2.4.* or 
2.5.*) packages? The maintainer said around Oct 06 that they would be 
released shortly. Thanks in advance.


-- 
Tony



From comand at blastwave.org  Sat Mar 10 00:56:52 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:56:52 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703081457v73ba48ddiacf1eae0a90726f5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703081457v73ba48ddiacf1eae0a90726f5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703091556w72946b3cl39fed20e8ed2dd17@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/8/07, Cory Omand <comand at blastwave.org> wrote:
> This is most certainly a bug, one which may have been hiding due to
> another bug.  I am rebuilding right now, to see if I can find out what
> is really happening here...  I'll follow with details as soon as I
> figure out what's wrong.

Thanks to James and Yann for tracking down the root cause of this
issue.  There were a couple of problems, but generally, it was a
problem with the 'init' install class.  This was fixed in the build
system generic SMF/init support, and new apache2c packages are now
staged for release.  If anyone is interested, the fix is in r1108
(http://svn.blastwave.org/trac/changeset/1108).

- C.


From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil  Mon Mar 12 16:03:47 2007
From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt Josh Civ 519 SMXS/MXDEB)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:03:47 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
Message-ID: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C1664@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>

Hi,

 

It looks like the stable branch is missing a bunch of packages for gnome.  I
don't see gnome_dtlogin, gnome_session and others.  Is gnome broken in the
stable branch or am I missing something?

 

Josh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070312/d4fd2baa/attachment.html 

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 12 16:22:20 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
In-Reply-To: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C1664@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil
	>
References: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C1664@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>
Message-ID: <56536.72.39.216.186.1173712940.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Hi,
>
>
>
> It looks like the stable branch is missing a bunch of packages for gnome.  I
> don't see gnome_dtlogin, gnome_session and others.  Is gnome broken in the
> stable branch or am I missing something?

  I guess I better look into that.

  A pkg-get -i gnome from the unstable branch should complete.

  What mirror are you using ?

Dennis



From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil  Mon Mar 12 17:23:59 2007
From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt Josh Civ 519 SMXS/MXDEB)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:23:59 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
Message-ID: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C17C9@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>

I don't recall which mirror I am using.  I use Blastwave on an isolated
network so I have to make a complete mirror myself and use that anyway.  I
checked several of the mirrors and the list of packages released with the
2007.01 release; they were all missing several packages from gnome.  It does
not seem to be confined to a single mirror.  

Last I tried running Gnome from unstable I had a lot of problems, is
unstable Gnome working ok now?

Thanks,

Josh
 

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 9:22 AM
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?


> Hi,
>
>
>
> It looks like the stable branch is missing a bunch of packages for gnome.
I
> don't see gnome_dtlogin, gnome_session and others.  Is gnome broken in the
> stable branch or am I missing something?

  I guess I better look into that.

  A pkg-get -i gnome from the unstable branch should complete.

  What mirror are you using ?

Dennis

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 12 17:51:31 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:51:31 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
In-Reply-To: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C17C9@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>
References: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C17C9@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>
Message-ID: <20070312.16513100.1626410050@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 12/03/07, 16:23:59, Leavitt Josh Civ 519 SMXS/MXDEB 
<Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil> wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Is stable gnome 
missing packages?:

> Last I tried running Gnome from unstable I had a lot of problems,

Yes, that is why it didn't get put into stable.


> is unstable Gnome working ok now?

Unstable gnome should be usable, there might be the odd missing
links, clock applet, maybe evolution to firefox libs is broken.



James.


From theyaga at gmail.com  Tue Mar 13 04:30:51 2007
From: theyaga at gmail.com (S.Theyagarajan )
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:00:51 +0530
Subject: [csw-users] Installing CVS
Message-ID: <19d5c040703122030s1ac153bne5082c105ca7a633@mail.gmail.com>

hi all ,
          I tried installing cvs on my SUN machine using pkg-get. But it
failed
Iam pasting the output

bash-3.00# pkg-get -i cvs
./pkg-get[1820]: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable:  not found
No existing install of CSWcvs found. Installing...
Trying
http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/csw/unstable/sparc/5.11/cvs-1.11.22,REV=2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
--19:56:59--
http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/csw/unstable/sparc/5.11/cvs-1.11.22,REV=2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
           => `cvs-1.11.22,REV=2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'
Connecting to 10.0.0.101:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [text/html]

    [ <=>                                 ] 1,644
--.--K/s

19:57:23 (49.00 MB/s) - `cvs-1.11.22,REV=
2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' saved [1644]

mkdir: Failed to make directory "/var/pkg-get/downloads/"; File exists
ERROR: could not verify downloaded file correctly
bash-3.00#


Anyone could explain what has gone wrong ? and what i could do about it.
-- 
thanks
taggy
http://freeshell.in/~taggy/blog
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.Theyagarajan
Under Graduate
Department Of Computer Science And Engineering
National Institute Of Technology , Trichirapalli
India 620015
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070313/9c1c8d66/attachment.html 

From jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk  Tue Mar 13 10:15:27 2007
From: jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Boyd)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:15:27 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Printing with seamonkey 1.1.1
Message-ID: <20070313091527.C212453A6D@webmail219.herald.ox.ac.uk>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070313/9946c290/attachment.ksh 

From ihsan at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 13 14:35:02 2007
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:35:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] some information about amavisd
Message-ID: <45F6A886.7060502@blastwave.org>

Hello,

This affects you only, if you are using the unstable distribution. If
you are using stable, you can ignore this e-mail.

If you have upgraded lately to the newest Perl from unstable, you have
got probably something like that, when you tried to start amavisd-new:

# ./amavisd-new start
Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't load
'/opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/auto/BerkeleyDB/BerkeleyDB.so' for module
BerkeleyDB: ld.so.1: perl: fatal: libdb-4.3.so: open failed: No such
file or directory at /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8/XSLoader.pm line 70.
at (eval 45) line 14
Compilation failed in require at (eval 45) line 14.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 45) line 14.
Undefined subroutine &BerkeleyDB::Term::close_everything called at
/opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/BerkeleyDB.pm line 1675.
END failed--call queue aborted.

This is because pm_berkeleydb (amavisd_new depends on it) is using
Berkeley DB 4.3 while the newest Perl is using 4.4. If you are
experiencing this problem, please upgrade pm_berkeleydb and amavisd_new
from testing:

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_berkeleydb-0.31,REV=2007.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_berkeleydb-0.31,REV=2007.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/amavisd_new-2.4.5,REV=2007.03.12-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

IMPORTANT: Please upgrade amavisd_new as well. The postinstall script of
the amavisd_new package will upgrade your db files to 4.4.

I've got already two positive reports from users. If don't get any
negative reports, those two packages are going to the unstable tree by
the end of this week.



Ihsan


-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/
			http://gallery.dogan.ch/
	 		http://ihsan.dogan.ch/


From lscharf at vt.edu  Tue Mar 13 21:16:04 2007
From: lscharf at vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:16:04 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
Message-ID: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu>

Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged 
on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?

It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)

Thanks,
-Luke

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070313/c7374630/attachment.bin 

From Thomas.Baca at NAU.EDU  Thu Mar 15 21:08:02 2007
From: Thomas.Baca at NAU.EDU (Thomas L Baca)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:08:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
Message-ID: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

How dangerous is it to mix non-blastwave-packaged perl modules into a
blastwave Perl installation?

I am relatively new to blastwave's perl packages, having rolled my own
installations over the years and having maintained them with the cpan
module in recent years.

I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to what
extent that locks me into only those modules that are available as
packages.

Any advice out there?

thanks,
-tom


From shuttlebox at gmail.com  Thu Mar 15 22:26:06 2007
From: shuttlebox at gmail.com (shuttlebox)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:26:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
In-Reply-To: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <625385e30703151426s4a949ddfobb91991ad7ad7b81@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/15/07, Thomas L Baca <Thomas.Baca at nau.edu> wrote:
> How dangerous is it to mix non-blastwave-packaged perl modules into a
> blastwave Perl installation?
>
> I am relatively new to blastwave's perl packages, having rolled my own
> installations over the years and having maintained them with the cpan
> module in recent years.
>
> I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to what
> extent that locks me into only those modules that are available as
> packages.
>
> Any advice out there?

Assuming you start CPAN from Blastwave's Perl you should be OK but it
would be better if you built the missing modules for Blastwave or
requested them. You can do the latter here:
http://www.blastwave.org/pkgreq.php.

What modules are you interested in?

-- 
/peter


From comand at blastwave.org  Thu Mar 15 23:32:55 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:32:55 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
In-Reply-To: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703151532x7b6226bbhfaf2fa77dcbb55d5@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/15/07, Thomas L Baca <Thomas.Baca at nau.edu> wrote:
> How dangerous is it to mix non-blastwave-packaged perl modules into a
> blastwave Perl installation?
>
> I am relatively new to blastwave's perl packages, having rolled my own
> installations over the years and having maintained them with the cpan
> module in recent years.
>
> I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to what
> extent that locks me into only those modules that are available as
> packages.

The only thing that you'll be locked into at the moment is the need to
use the same compiler as Perl itself was compiled with -- Sun Studio
11.  Other than that, you should be able to use CPAN/CPANPLUS (coming
soon) to add any additional modules.  Of course, if you're doing a lot
of clean installs, you would need to package your locally built
modules yourself... so making a package request, as was separately
requested, is probably better.

- C.


From aaron at ernieball.com  Thu Mar 15 23:37:33 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:37:33 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <10f0b5e5919.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>
References: <10f0b5e5919.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>
Message-ID: <45F9CAAD.1090808@ernieball.com>

Sorry to bring this one back from the grave...

I got sidetracked and moved onto more important things.

Yes still having problems even with the dependencies met

The gtk I have is 2.10.1,REV=2006.08.08

Aaron

Alessio Cervellin wrote:
> So you still have the problem even after installing all the 
> dependencies?
> Anyway the missing lib shown in the error you say is in 
> CSWgtk2
>
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: aaron at ernieball.com
> Data: 21-
> nov-2006 4.51 PM
> A: "questions and discussions"<users at lists.blastwave.
> org>
> Ogg: Re: [csw-users] Evince
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.
> org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Fri Mar 16 00:15:21 2007
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:15:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30703151426s4a949ddfobb91991ad7ad7b81@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<625385e30703151426s4a949ddfobb91991ad7ad7b81@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070315181521.00000657@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:26:06 +0100
shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote:

> > I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to
> > what extent that locks me into only those modules that are
> > available as packages.

In addition to what Cory said, be sure to install to the site
directory.  Blastwave packages should be going into the vendor
directories and not touch the site directories.

Looking at @INC, site is above vendor.  So if you want to use modules
from blastwave that you have installed into the site directories, you
will need to uninstall what you added to the site directories.

Alex


-- 


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Fri Mar 16 09:29:36 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:29:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] how to enable gdm on solaris 10, 11?
Message-ID: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
on my laptop, Sun gdm (JDS?) is enabled.
I just installed gdm from blastwave, but don't understand how to enable it.
on "News for CSW package 'gdm'", Ken Mays wrote:
Installation:

Please consult README.install for instructions on how to
configure and install GDM.

but there no README in the gdm package. And svcs only show gdm from sun
Anybody can help?

thanks in advance,

gerard


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Fri Mar 16 09:33:48 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] how to enable gdm on solaris 10, 11?
In-Reply-To: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <45FA566C.7030709@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

G?rard Henry wrote:
> hello all,
> on my laptop, Sun gdm (JDS?) is enabled.
> I just installed gdm from blastwave, but don't understand how to enable it.
> on "News for CSW package 'gdm'", Ken Mays wrote:

another strange thing:
Contact:

The GDM mail list is gdm-list at gnome.org. Archives can be found here:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/
and on this url:

Search mail.gnome.org

NOTICE (2006-07-08): We're re-building the archive search indexes 
(again). It bombed out silently last time leaving lockfiles in place 
(and archives unsearchable). Please bear with us while we try to get it 
sorted out. -- GNOME sysadmin team.

This index contains lots of documents and lots of keywords.

Last modified: 2006-07-08

nothing has changed since 2006???


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Fri Mar 16 10:09:08 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:09:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] how to enable gdm on solaris 10, 11?
In-Reply-To: <45FA566C.7030709@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<45FA566C.7030709@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <45FA5EB4.4060006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

ok, here is the solution:

in /usr/share/xsessions, there are CDE.desktop and gnome.desktop, by 
default.
cp gnome.desktop xfce.desktop
and xfce.desktop contains:
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Name=Xfce 4.2 Session
Comment=Use this session to run Xfce 4.2 as your desktop environment
Exec=/usr/bin/ctrun -l child -i none /etc/dt/config/Xinitrc.CSWxfce
TryExec=/usr/bin/ctrun -l child -i none /etc/dt/config/Xinitrc.CSWxfce
# no icon yet, only the top three are currently used
Icon=/opt/csw/share/pixmaps/xfce4_xicon1.png
Type=Application


why don't include this file in your package?


From mark.round at gmail.com  Fri Mar 16 22:30:27 2007
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:30:27 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Updated PostgreSQL 8.2.3 packages
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Just a heads up - updated PostgreSQL packages will be heading out to
the unstable tree soon. For anyone running prior versions, you will
need to do a dump & reload cycle when upgrading - otherwise your
databases will NOT work. This cycle is covered in the online
documentation, essential just do a pg_dumpall BEFORE upgrading, and
afterwards create a new data directory then reload the resulting SQL.

Links for the documentation :
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/backup-dump.html

-Mark


From aaron at ernieball.com  Fri Mar 16 23:51:07 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (aaron at ernieball.com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:51:07 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com>

I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even after updating
the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?


From griffous at griffous.net  Sat Mar 17 11:30:47 2007
From: griffous at griffous.net (Jonathan Wheeler)
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:30:47 +1300
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>

aaron at ernieball.com wrote:
> I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even after updating
> the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?

Hi Aaron,

Amarok has only just been submitted to the Blastwave admins over the 
past couple of days.
I don't fully understand the mirroring process myself, but I'd expect 
that if it's made it as far as the unstable list, it won't be far away!

If you can't wait, email me off-list and I'll be happy to give you a 
link to the package, otherwise as I've mentioned, hopefully it'll be 
working under the normal channels real-soon-now... :)

Jonathan
Amarok Maintainer


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Sat Mar 17 18:41:04 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:41:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com> <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>
Message-ID: <33889.72.39.216.186.1174153264.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> aaron at ernieball.com wrote:
>> I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even after
>> updating
>> the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Amarok has only just been submitted to the Blastwave admins over the
> past couple of days.

yes .. please don't hold your breath but .. feel free to check the big
mirror sites in the next 24 hours.

the x86 version can be had manually from :

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/amarok-1.4.4,REV=2007.03.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

but in a very short while it will be at

http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/

okay ?

Dennis Clarke                 dclarke at blastwave.org
Director Blastwave.org        http://www.blastwave.org
 ----------------------------------------------------
Further Info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blastwave



From aaron at ernieball.com  Sun Mar 18 08:15:02 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (aaron at ernieball.com)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <33889.72.39.216.186.1174153264.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com> <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>
	<33889.72.39.216.186.1174153264.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <f719d20e875.45fce6f6@ernieball.com>

Literally within 5 minutes of sending that email it dawned on me to check the
testing page. At work run 100% Solaris. at home Ubuntu. Just decided to switch
to OpenSolaris at home/research it for work so I know what is in store for
Solaris 11. Almost built Amarok from source for purely personal reasons. Gotta
have your music :) Went to bed woke up and it was on blastwave. Still have to
figure out intricacies of kde apps in Solaris. Used to gnome and running kde
apps in gnome and on Linux only. All in all awesome package though. Works great.
Now if I could only figure out why gftp seems to download really slow. Gotta get
my music off another device that only has ftp access. Another topic, another time...


Thanks for the really sweet port. 

----- Original Message -----
From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke at blastwave.org>
Date: Saturday, March 17, 2007 10:41 am
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Amarok?

> 
> > aaron at ernieball.com wrote:
> >> I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even 
> after>> updating
> >> the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?
> >
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > Amarok has only just been submitted to the Blastwave admins over the
> > past couple of days.
> 
> yes .. please don't hold your breath but .. feel free to check the big
> mirror sites in the next 24 hours.
> 
> the x86 version can be had manually from :
> 
> http://www.blastwave.org/testing/amarok-1.4.4,REV=2007.03.14-
> SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> but in a very short while it will be at
> 
> http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/
> 
> okay ?
> 
> Dennis Clarke                 dclarke at blastwave.org
> Director Blastwave.org        http://www.blastwave.org
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Further Info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blastwave
> 
> 


From aaron at ernieball.com  Mon Mar 19 19:32:49 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:32:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <45F9CAAD.1090808@ernieball.com>
References: <10f0b5e5919.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>
	<45F9CAAD.1090808@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <45FED751.5060206@ernieball.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070319/fbf4bc36/attachment.html 

From andepiel45 at hotmail.com  Mon Mar 19 19:45:59 2007
From: andepiel45 at hotmail.com (Andepiel)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:45:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] KDE repos
Message-ID: <45FEDA67.8030704@hotmail.com>


  Hi:

   I am pretty new in Solaris. I have problems trying to find a good
list of repositories, since there are a lot of packages missing on my
system.

   Summarizing, I am looking for:

LIST OF REPOSITORIES FOR PKG-GET

    I would like to have access to:

    -> KDE packages (KDE, amarok, ...).
    -> GNU libraries (such as gcc2l, gpg and so on).
    -> Mozilla Packages (thunderbird, firefox, ...)
    -> Opera packages

    It looks like that there are so few repositories for openSolaris.

    I guess Java, eclipse and so on are already on the default repos.


ENABLING ADMINTOOL

  For having some kind of GUI based package manager. It is a pitty that
smart do not work yet with BSD ports (for this branch of Unix).


PKG-GET CONFIG FILE

  I was expecting some kind of sources.list (pkg-get.conf) but I don't
know how to work with this file, since whatever the change I made, it is
always consulting same repos.

   I tried also this way:

    pkg-get -s URL -U

    Results is that upgrade the catalog, but nothing happens: same list
of packages and download packages from the same place.

     Is there anyway to enable several repos?

  Thanks,

C?sar







		
______________________________________________ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com


From ihsan at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 12:12:48 2007
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:12:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>

Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:

> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
> 
> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)

What exactly is "watch"?



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/
			http://gallery.dogan.ch/
	 		http://ihsan.dogan.ch/


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 20 14:19:30 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <45FED751.5060206@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <807316.82365.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Updated the gtk from testing. Getting an entirely new
error now. Selecting Print no longer crashes the
program. I can see a list of my printers now. I select
one and hit print and I get a dialog box that says
"Too many failed attempts" or from command line "**
(evince:3077): WARNING **: Error result: Too many
failed attempts"

Evince itself shows a dialog box that just says "Too
many failed attempts"

Aaron Wilson wrote: 
Sorry to bring this one back from the grave...

I got sidetracked and moved onto more important
things.

Yes still having problems even with the dependencies
met

The gtk I have is 2.10.1,REV=2006.08.08

Aaron
----------------------------------

Aaron,

Are you using GTK2-2.10.11 in /testing?? The older
one was buggy so we are in the process of replacing
it.

As for Evince, ar you able to print using other
programs?

~K





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!  
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/


From listen at alexander.skwar.name  Tue Mar 20 14:13:55 2007
From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [csw-users] Socksify (dante): ld.so.1: rsync: fatal:
	/opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
Message-ID: <loom.20070320T141117-102@post.gmane.org>

Hi!

I just installed dante (dante-1.1.14,REV=2005.01.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW and
libsocks-1.1.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW) on a 

askwar at winpc000220 ~ $ uname -a
SunOS winpc000220 5.9 Generic_118558-26 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100

system. I'm interested in the socksify script, which I try to use:

askwar at winpc000220 ~/.ssh $ socksify rsync rsync://rsync.gtlib.gatech.edu/gentoo
ld.so.1: rsync: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
Killed

Well, no luck ;)

Am I doing something wrong?

Best regards,
Alexander Skwar



From lscharf at vt.edu  Tue Mar 20 14:21:48 2007
From: lscharf at vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:21:48 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>

Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:
>
>   
>> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
>> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
>>
>> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)
>>     
>
> What exactly is "watch"?
>   

It's a program that will run a command repeatedly, displaying the 
command on the screen.  For example:
    watch -n 2 'gls -lh $HOME/download'
This will run "gls -lh $HOME/download" every two seconds and display the 
results on the screen in a cleanish way.

I wouldn't want to use it to run 'rm -rf' -- but it really is nice for 
watching large downloads, RAID rebuilds, zpool scrubs, df, and suchlike.

I'll be happy to contribute some work for this package, but I'm not 
quite sure where to start -- or if this really belongs in another 
package.  (I'm C/C++/make/scripting and Unix literate, but I haven't 
contributed packages  to a group like this before.)

-Luke

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/0f610d3b/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/0f610d3b/attachment.bin 

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 14:29:54 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Ihsan Dogan wrote:
>> Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:
>>
>>
>>> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
>>> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
>>>
>>> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)
>>>
>>
>> What exactly is "watch"?
>>
>
> It's a program that will run a command repeatedly, displaying the
> command on the screen.  For example:
>     watch -n 2 'gls -lh $HOME/download'
> This will run "gls -lh $HOME/download" every two seconds and display the
> results on the screen in a cleanish way.
>
> I wouldn't want to use it to run 'rm -rf' -- but it really is nice for
> watching large downloads, RAID rebuilds, zpool scrubs, df, and suchlike.
>
> I'll be happy to contribute some work for this package, but I'm not
> quite sure where to start -- or if this really belongs in another
> package.  (I'm C/C++/make/scripting and Unix literate, but I haven't
> contributed packages  to a group like this before.)

I like it.

Where is the source ?  On the RHEL5 source CD ISO images or somewhere ?

Dennis



From james at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 15:13:00 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:00 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Socksify (dante): ld.so.1: rsync: fatal:
 /opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
In-Reply-To: <loom.20070320T141117-102@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20070320T141117-102@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <20070320.14130000.2554442981@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 20/03/07, 13:13:55, Alexander Skwar <listen at alexander.skwar.name> wrote 
regarding [csw-users] Socksify (dante): ld.so.1: rsync: fatal: 
/opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32:

> askwar at winpc000220 ~/.ssh $ socksify rsync 
rsync://rsync.gtlib.gatech.edu/gentoo
> ld.so.1: rsync: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: 
ELFCLASS32
> Killed

rsync is isaexec invoked.  It will run as a 64 bit binary.
/opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so is a 32 bit lib.

I suspect /opt/csw/bin/socksify is preloading the 32bit lib but
execcing a 64bit binary.  Try naming the 32bit rsync (untested):


$ socksify /opt/csw/bin/sparcv8/rsync rsync://rsyn...




James.


From aaron at ernieball.com  Tue Mar 20 15:14:34 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:14:34 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <807316.82365.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <807316.82365.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <45FFEC4A.3020905@ernieball.com>

using GTK2-2.10.11 in /testing

Yes I can print from other programs.



ken mays wrote:
> Updated the gtk from testing. Getting an entirely new
> error now. Selecting Print no longer crashes the
> program. I can see a list of my printers now. I select
> one and hit print and I get a dialog box that says
> "Too many failed attempts" or from command line "**
> (evince:3077): WARNING **: Error result: Too many
> failed attempts"
>
> Evince itself shows a dialog box that just says "Too
> many failed attempts"
>
> Aaron Wilson wrote: 
> Sorry to bring this one back from the grave...
>
> I got sidetracked and moved onto more important
> things.
>
> Yes still having problems even with the dependencies
> met
>
> The gtk I have is 2.10.1,REV=2006.08.08
>
> Aaron
> ----------------------------------
>
> Aaron,
>
> Are you using GTK2-2.10.11 in /testing?? The older
> one was buggy so we are in the process of replacing
> it.
>
> As for Evince, ar you able to print using other
> programs?
>
> ~K
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> It's here! Your new message!  
> Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


From lscharf at vt.edu  Tue Mar 20 15:18:32 2007
From: lscharf at vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:18:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
	<35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>

Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Ihsan Dogan wrote:
>>     
>>> Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
>>>> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
>>>>
>>>> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> What exactly is "watch"?
>>>
>>>       
>> It's a program that will run a command repeatedly, displaying the
>> command on the screen.  For example:
>>     watch -n 2 'gls -lh $HOME/download'
>> This will run "gls -lh $HOME/download" every two seconds and display the
>> results on the screen in a cleanish way.
>>
>> I wouldn't want to use it to run 'rm -rf' -- but it really is nice for
>> watching large downloads, RAID rebuilds, zpool scrubs, df, and suchlike.
>>
>> I'll be happy to contribute some work for this package, but I'm not
>> quite sure where to start -- or if this really belongs in another
>> package.  (I'm C/C++/make/scripting and Unix literate, but I haven't
>> contributed packages  to a group like this before.)
>>     
>
> I like it.
>
> Where is the source ?  On the RHEL5 source CD ISO images or somewhere ?
>   

It's been included as part of the base distribution (and part of the 
source) -- I don't remember when it was introduced, but it's probably 
been around at least as long as RH9.  One source RPM is available here:
    
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/6/source/SRPMS/procps-3.2.7-8.src.rpm
Also, an RHEL5ish version is available here (It should also be available 
on the RHEL5 source CDs):
    http://beta.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/procps-3.2.7-8.src.rpm
I'm actually running YellowDog Linux 4.1 on my Linux desktop at work at 
the moment, which is based on Fedora Core 3, I think.  Here is the exact 
SRPM that I'm using today:
    
ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/yellowdog/releases/yellowdog-4.1/en/os/SRPMS/procps-3.2.0-1.2.ydl.1.src.rpm

BTW, there is a fair bit of stuff in this package, including top, w, 
uptime and some low-level system utilities:

    $ rpm -ql procps | grep bin
    /bin/ps
    /sbin/sysctl
    /usr/bin/free
    /usr/bin/pgrep
    /usr/bin/pkill
    /usr/bin/pmap
    /usr/bin/skill
    /usr/bin/slabtop
    /usr/bin/snice
    /usr/bin/tload
    /usr/bin/top
    /usr/bin/uptime
    /usr/bin/vmstat
    /usr/bin/w
    /usr/bin/watch
      

There is a separate coreutils package on Redhat, which is separate from 
this.

What else can I do to help out?

Thanks,
-Luke

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/f9c84cc9/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/f9c84cc9/attachment.bin 

From admar at luon.net  Tue Mar 20 15:28:55 2007
From: admar at luon.net (Admar Schoonen)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:28:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
	<35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20070320142855.GB27016@pingguo.luon.net>

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:29:54AM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I like it.
> 
> Where is the source ?  On the RHEL5 source CD ISO images or somewhere ?

On my debian box, the source is from http://procps.sourceforge.net/index.html,
which, besides watch, also has ps, top, vmstat, sysctl, w, kill, skill, nice,
snice, pgrep, free, tload, and uptime.

I don't know if all of those programs can be compiled on or ported to solaris
easily, but perhaps that's not necessary.

Regards

Admar


From dnb at ccs.neu.edu  Tue Mar 20 15:43:56 2007
From: dnb at ccs.neu.edu (David Blank-Edelman)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:43:56 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
	<35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <C0F4F2B3-077F-4D49-8BFD-68048EA90B98@ccs.neu.edu>


On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Luke Scharf wrote:

> BTW, there is a fair bit of stuff in this package, including top,  
> w, uptime and some low-level system utilities:

Just FYI: there are a number of programs that do the same thing that  
aren't nearly as wrapped up in a specific OS (and hence require  
porting). The first time I ever encountered this particular idea was  
with the "display" program posted to comp.unix.sources/mod.sources  
back in the days of yore:

http://groups.google.com/group/mod.sources/browse_thread/thread/ 
1cf184d7e530273e/931bd812fe26dc85?lnk=st&q=display+vixie 
+mod.sources&rnum=2&hl=en#931bd812fe26dc85

Patch to it here:

http://groups.google.com/group/net.sources.bugs/browse_thread/thread/ 
d278ac77d5defd02/eab4dc78a45bdd10?lnk=st&q=display+vixie 
+mod.sources&rnum=1&hl=en#eab4dc78a45bdd10

There's vis: http://examples.oreilly.de/english_examples/upt3/split/ 
vis/vis/

And I know there is at least one Perl implementation (a student of  
mine wrote it), probably several.

         -- dNb

P.S. Speaking about old timey programs to do cool things, have you  
seen iselect? http://www.ossp.org/pkg/tool/iselect/ .


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 20 21:30:16 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About the new GNOME release...
In-Reply-To: <45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Hello,

It was mentioned that Dennis Clarke and James Lee are
reviewing the next release of GNOME for Blastwave. You
may see an announcement soon from Dennis on the
progression of the project and a possible release date
at soon as Tuesday (maybe, maybe not).

Stay tuned...





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 22:22:58 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:22:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About the new GNOME release...
In-Reply-To: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <36469.72.39.216.186.1174425778.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Hello,
>
> It was mentioned that Dennis Clarke and James Lee are
> reviewing the next release of GNOME for Blastwave. You
> may see an announcement soon from Dennis on the
> progression of the project and a possible release date
> at soon as Tuesday (maybe, maybe not).


  I'm doing my last and final here.  I want to push it around for a few days
on x86 and maybe one last complete pkg-get -i gnome test. Thus far it is
really nice and works better than the implementation in Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 5. Seriously, even Wanda the Fish works as expected on Solaris but in
the build from Red Hat .. she barely swims.

  I'll keep you all posted.

Dennis




From andepiel45 at hotmail.com  Wed Mar 21 10:06:31 2007
From: andepiel45 at hotmail.com (Andepiel)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:06:31 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <36469.72.39.216.186.1174425778.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<36469.72.39.216.186.1174425778.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <4600F597.9030108@hotmail.com>


  Will be available the KDE 4 too? I think is going to be out for summer.

  Thanks,

C?sar

===================

PD.: Is there any possibility for universities to enable some
repositories with packages for openSolaris? May be this way more repos
will be enabled.


Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It was mentioned that Dennis Clarke and James Lee are
>> reviewing the next release of GNOME for Blastwave. You
>> may see an announcement soon from Dennis on the
>> progression of the project and a possible release date
>> at soon as Tuesday (maybe, maybe not).
> 
> 
>   I'm doing my last and final here.  I want to push it around for a few days
> on x86 and maybe one last complete pkg-get -i gnome test. Thus far it is
> really nice and works better than the implementation in Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux 5. Seriously, even Wanda the Fish works as expected on Solaris but in
> the build from Red Hat .. she barely swims.
> 
>   I'll keep you all posted.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 



		
______________________________________________ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Mar 21 12:55:30 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <4600F597.9030108@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <844905.80196.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Yes, KDE 4.0 is the next Blastwave submission after
the GNOME 2.14/2.16 submission for the current stable
snapshot. I'm still playing with GIMP 2.3.15 which is
over in our /testing area.

I am working off of the current KDE 4.0 (3.80.3)
unstable snapshot which I have ported to the Sun Ultra
40 and Sun Ultra 45. 

The compositor manager works with the Nvidia Quadro
3500 & Nvidia drivers very well. I was able to test
Mesa and Mesademos out as well as my ports of SGI
OpenGL GLUT demos. Basically, all of the 3D effects
you hear about with Compiz, Beryl, Metisse will all
work under KDE and GNOME under Solaris.

I worked on KDE 3.5.6 for Solaris, yet KDE 4.0 is a
major milestone for Blastwave. It is too late to add
KOffice 1.6.2 to the new stable snapshot, but I'll
migrate it after the next stable snapshot is done (I
hope!).

Note: By the way, KDE 4.0 is not officially released
yet and is NOT considered stable (for production use)
yet. Once Dennis finishes his testing of the new GNOME
for Blastwave and we tweak it a little more, I'll
focus fully on KDE 4.0 - once again...

~ Ken Mays




 






--------------------------------------------
Will be available the KDE 4 too? I think is going to
be out for 
summer.

  Thanks,

C?sar

===================

PD.: Is there any possibility for universities to
enable some
repositories with packages for openSolaris? May be
this way more repos
will be enabled.





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 


From tim.smith at degreec.com  Wed Mar 21 13:09:34 2007
From: tim.smith at degreec.com (Tim Smith)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:09:34 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <844905.80196.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <844905.80196.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4601207E.1040209@degreec.com>

Ok, so the million-dollar question ... any chance the slick 3d stuff 
will work for us mere-mortals with lower-end (sunblade1000, expert3d 
class) sparc boxen?  ;-)

Timothy Smith
IT Administrator
Degree Controls, INC



ken mays wrote:
> Yes, KDE 4.0 is the next Blastwave submission after
> the GNOME 2.14/2.16 submission for the current stable
> snapshot. I'm still playing with GIMP 2.3.15 which is
> over in our /testing area.
>
> I am working off of the current KDE 4.0 (3.80.3)
> unstable snapshot which I have ported to the Sun Ultra
> 40 and Sun Ultra 45. 
>
> The compositor manager works with the Nvidia Quadro
> 3500 & Nvidia drivers very well. I was able to test
> Mesa and Mesademos out as well as my ports of SGI
> OpenGL GLUT demos. Basically, all of the 3D effects
> you hear about with Compiz, Beryl, Metisse will all
> work under KDE and GNOME under Solaris.
>
> I worked on KDE 3.5.6 for Solaris, yet KDE 4.0 is a
> major milestone for Blastwave. It is too late to add
> KOffice 1.6.2 to the new stable snapshot, but I'll
> migrate it after the next stable snapshot is done (I
> hope!).
>
> Note: By the way, KDE 4.0 is not officially released
> yet and is NOT considered stable (for production use)
> yet. Once Dennis finishes his testing of the new GNOME
> for Blastwave and we tweak it a little more, I'll
> focus fully on KDE 4.0 - once again...
>
> ~ Ken Mays
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Will be available the KDE 4 too? I think is going to
> be out for 
> summer.
>
>   Thanks,
>
> C?sar
>
> ===================
>
> PD.: Is there any possibility for universities to
> enable some
> repositories with packages for openSolaris? May be
> this way more repos
> will be enabled.
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Mar 21 15:53:26 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <4601207E.1040209@degreec.com>
Message-ID: <640987.47707.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

The minimum SPARC requirements is at least a Sun Blade
100 compatible platform (with >=256MB RAM) and Sun's
OpenGL 1.5. 

But as they say, you get what you pay for... ;o>

~ Ken


----------------------------
Ok, so the million-dollar question ... any chance the
slick 3d stuff 
will work for us mere-mortals with lower-end
(sunblade1000, expert3d 
class) sparc boxen?  ;-)

Timothy Smith
IT Administrator
Degree Controls, INC



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097


From william at wbonnet.net  Thu Mar 22 09:00:42 2007
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:00:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 2.0.0.3 is available
Message-ID: <460237AA.7050908@wbonnet.net>

Hi

The latest version of Firefox is available from testing for both sparc 
and x86. Please let me know if you have any problem with these packages. 
If no problem is reported.

Kind regards,

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Thu Mar 22 16:31:47 2007
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:31:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
Message-ID: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com>

No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:

# (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
        software                    localrev                   remoterev
       wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946

Anyone else seeing this?

/MOL


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Mar 26 14:06:52 2007
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:06:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>

On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> 
> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> 
> Anyone else seeing this?

Nobody?


From andepiel45 at hotmail.com  Mon Mar 26 14:18:28 2007
From: andepiel45 at hotmail.com (Andepiel)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:18:28 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Nexenta
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4607BA14.8000107@hotmail.com>



  Look at this project:

http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Nexenta_OS

   Pretty nice, don't you think?

C?sar


		
______________________________________________ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Mon Mar 26 14:51:52 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:51:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4607C1E8.3030407@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Mats Larsson wrote:
> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
>> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
>> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
>>
>> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
>>
>> Anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Nobody?


# (From site http://blastwave.berlios.de/csw//unstable )
        software                    localrev                   remoterev
       wireshark             [Not installed]            0.99.5,rev=20946


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Mar 26 15:09:30 2007
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:09:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607C1E8.3030407@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<4607C1E8.3030407@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <4607C60A.3080807@ericsson.com>

On 2007-03-26 14:51, G?rard Henry wrote:
> Mats Larsson wrote:
>> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
>>> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
>>> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
>>>
>>> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>>>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>>>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
>>>
>>> Anyone else seeing this?
>> Nobody?
> 
> 
> # (From site http://blastwave.berlios.de/csw//unstable )
>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>        wireshark             [Not installed]            0.99.5,rev=20946

And if you install it?


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 15:18:13 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:18:13 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 26/03/07, 13:06:52, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote 
regarding Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:

> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> > No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get
> > the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> >
> > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> >
> > Anyone else seeing this?

> Nobody?

Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
out exactly where or why.



James.


From anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com  Mon Mar 26 16:03:31 2007
From: anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com (Anthony Cogan)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:03:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
Message-ID: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>

Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav packages?

I'm getting the following errors in my nightly logwatch report....

    Received signal: wake up: 4 Time(s)
    nonblock_connect: connect timing out (30 secs): 7 Time(s)
    WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!: 49 Time(s)
    WARNING: Current functionality level = 10, recommended = 14: 16  
Time(s)
    DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/faq.html: 49 Time(s)
    WARNING: Current functionality level = 10, recommended = 13: 9  
Time(s)
    connect_error: getsockopt(SO_ERROR): fd=6 error=145: Connection  
timed out: 1 Time(s)
    WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended version: 0.90.1: 16  
Time(s)
    WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended version: 0.90: 8 Time(s)
    freshclam daemon 0.88.7 (OS: solaris2.8, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386):  
2 Time(s)


From shuttlebox at gmail.com  Mon Mar 26 16:13:02 2007
From: shuttlebox at gmail.com (shuttlebox)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:13:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/26/07, James Lee <james at blastwave.org> wrote:
> On 26/03/07, 13:06:52, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote
> regarding Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:
>
> > On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> > > No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get
> > > the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> > >
> > > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> > >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> > >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > >
> > > Anyone else seeing this?
>
> > Nobody?
>
> Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
> out exactly where or why.

I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
vote for the latter.

-- 
/peter


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 16:26:45 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:26:45 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
	<625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070326.14264500.1227556374@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 26/03/07, 15:13:02, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote regarding 
Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:

> > > > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> > > >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> > > >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > > Nobody?
> >
> > Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
> > out exactly where or why.

> I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
> to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
> vote for the latter.

> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 16:31:47 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:31:47 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
	<625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070326.14314700.537859295@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 26/03/07, 15:13:02, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote regarding
Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:

> > > > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> > > >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> > > >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > > Nobody?
> >
> > Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
> > out exactly where or why.

> I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
> to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
> vote for the latter.

The way it used to work it didn't matter if REV was even REV, it
just stripped the leading part that matched then took the longer
if one was null.  It's possible Phil has changed this.

Is used to be so:
    0.99.5 < 0.99.5.sackofpotatoes
things only get confusing when comparing:
    0.99.5.sackofpotatoes to 0.99.5.basketoffruit.




James.


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 17:18:49 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:18:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <37790.72.39.216.186.1174922329.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
>> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get
>> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
>>
>> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
>>
>> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Nobody?

# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -d wireshark
Trying
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/sparc/5.8/wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
--11:17:04-- 
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/sparc/5.8/wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
           => `wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'
Resolving ftp.math.purdue.edu... 128.210.3.14
Connecting to ftp.math.purdue.edu|128.210.3.14|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 16,183,570 (15M) [text/plain]

    0K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 19%  543.50 KB/s
 3072K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 38%  499.42 KB/s
 6144K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 58%  552.74 KB/s
 9216K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 77%  540.73 KB/s
12288K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 97%  570.26 KB/s
15360K ......                                               100%  562.38 KB/s

11:17:33 (540.88 KB/s) -
`wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' saved
[16183570/16183570]

downloaded wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
#


Looks like a bad datestamp that leads to sligt confusion.

Just pkgrm the wwireshark package and then pkg-get -install it again.

Dennis



From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 18:03:51 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Nexenta
In-Reply-To: <4607BA14.8000107@hotmail.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<4607BA14.8000107@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <37817.72.39.216.186.1174925031.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


>
>
>   Look at this project:
>
> http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Nexenta_OS
>
>    Pretty nice, don't you think?

  go look at the sponsors page there :

      http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Sponsors

  see  blastwave.org ?



Dennis



From a.cervellin at virgilio.it  Mon Mar 26 18:07:10 2007
From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:07:10 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
Message-ID: <1118f003fa3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>

> I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
> to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
> vote for the latter.

"REV" has a different meaning than "rev", the 
pkg name syntax is:

xxxx-#.#.#,REV=YYYY.MM.DD_rev=abcde-xxxxxxx
(see 
http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html)

the bug is that pkg-get 
doesn not handle the "rev" suffix when it's not together with the "REV" 
too.


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 18:19:09 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
In-Reply-To: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
References: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
Message-ID: <37869.72.39.216.186.1174925949.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav packages?

  DON'T PANIC!

10244341  Mar 11 09:00 clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
10303658  Mar 11 09:01 clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

so yeah .. and they are being tested.

Dennis



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 27 00:07:21 2007
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:07:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
In-Reply-To: <37869.72.39.216.186.1174925949.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
	<37869.72.39.216.186.1174925949.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20070326170721.00000444@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT)
"Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org> wrote:

> 
> > Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav
> > packages?
> 
>   DON'T PANIC!
> 
> 10244341  Mar 11 09:00
> clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz 10303658  Mar
> 11 09:01 clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> so yeah .. and they are being tested.

The latest on this is that I need to build a version that I can debug.
Besides configuration issues, ScanArchive enabled does not work with
this package.  I am trying to work on this; but time is not on my side
with my new responsibilities at my regular job.  I hope to have an
answer soon.

Alex

-- 


From casterln at nature.Berkeley.EDU  Tue Mar 27 00:11:48 2007
From: casterln at nature.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Casterline)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:11:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20070326221147.GC20273@nature.Berkeley.EDU>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:06:52PM +0200, Mats Larsson wrote:
> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> > No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
> > the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> > 
> > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > 
> > Anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Nobody?

Me too. 


From scott-blastwave at riskboys.com  Wed Mar 28 22:12:19 2007
From: scott-blastwave at riskboys.com (Scott White)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:12:19 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg-get v2 makecontents file
Message-ID: <55038.87.74.24.183.1175112739.squirrel@87.74.24.183>


Rgds

Scott


Does anyone have a new makecontents script for creating pkg-get
repositories?  The one at http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/makecontents is
for version 1 and doesn't create the descriptions file.

Rgds

Scott





From a.cervellin at virgilio.it  Thu Mar 29 12:19:06 2007
From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:19:06 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
Message-ID: <1119d34ab0e.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>

It should be fixed now, try again please.


----Messaggio originale----
Da: mats.larsson at ericsson.com
Data: 26-mar-2007 14.06
A: "questions and 
discussions"<users at lists.blastwave.org>
Ogg: Re: [csw-users] wireshark 
pkg problem

On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> No matter how 
many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
> the 
following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> 
> # (From site http:
//ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>         
software                    localrev                   remoterev
>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,
rev=20946
> 
> Anyone else seeing this?

Nobody?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.
org/mailman/listinfo/users





From roman.klesel at googlemail.com  Thu Mar 29 12:48:13 2007
From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:48:13 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] cswexim unstable: Upgrade trouble
Message-ID: <1d96939c0703290348i3e65b6adm19811cd6dc37a0ce@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

yesterday I did the following on one of our machines:

pkg-get -U
pkg-get upgrade

When replacing the exim package a quite nasty thing happened:

The exim executable /opt/csw/sbin/exim was replaced with a shell
script, that did something like:

/usr/lib/sendmail -bt

Unfortunately /usr/lib/sendmail is a sysmlink to /opt/csw/sbin/exim

No need to tell what happened when the installer tried to start the
exim deamon... :-(

Anyone else experianced the same problem? Or is it just here?

(solaris 9 sparc)

Greetings Roman


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Thu Mar 29 12:56:57 2007
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:56:57 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
In-Reply-To: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
References: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
Message-ID: <20070329055657.00006555@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:03:31 -0500
Anthony Cogan <anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav
> packages?
> 

I put an update for clamav libclamav at http://www.blastwave.org/testing

There is a new dependency on CSWgcc3corert.

ScanArchive enabled appears to work properly.

If you like, please download and manually install the update.

Thanks,

Alex


From zizban at adelphia.net  Sat Mar 31 02:09:44 2007
From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:09:44 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Fluxbox-1.0-rc.3
Message-ID: <B9B585A3-C7FB-46CA-9DEF-DFEA32225243@adelphia.net>

Hi all

Is there a dtlogin package for the new Fluxbox?


From Corey.Hart at synopsys.com  Thu Mar  1 00:53:43 2007
From: Corey.Hart at synopsys.com (Corey Hart)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:53:43 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
In-Reply-To: <20070227230421.96b8bade.adeason2@uiuc.edu>
References: <20070227230421.96b8bade.adeason2@uiuc.edu>
Message-ID: <1F64EB1FF8A50D429407320DED1A77B7059B63D5@US01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com>

For the bourne shell:

pkg-get -f -i <package> > /dev/null 2>&1 

...corey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org
> [mailto:users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Deason
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:04 PM
> To: users at lists.blastwave.org
> Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
> 
> Is there any way to suppress the exorbitant amount of output blastwave
> outputs when installing a package? I recently was trying an automated
> Solaris 10 install system we have set up, and one of the automated
> post-install steps was to install blastwave and several packages from
> it. However, I was doing this over a serial link, and since several
> packages output the entire GPL and LGPL when installing, it took quite
> a bit of time (longer than the entire rest of the install, as I
recall).
> 
> Are there any options to make pkg-get quieter (or the underlying
> pkgadd invocations), or at least to not display the licenses?
> 
> --
> Andrew Deason
> adeason2 at uiuc.edu



From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Thu Mar  1 03:06:32 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] gnome 2.14 problem in unstable branch
In-Reply-To: <1172632378.3971.35.camel@zebra>
Message-ID: <520678.87438.qm@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


Hello,

You are not using the latest packages which fixes the
old issues:

Use the packages in www.blastwave.org/testing to
updated your UNSTABLE/STABLE snapshot of GNOME.

Current: GNOME 2.16.3
 
~Ken


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather


From adeason2 at uiuc.edu  Thu Mar  1 07:31:47 2007
From: adeason2 at uiuc.edu (Andrew Deason)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:31:47 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
In-Reply-To: <1F64EB1FF8A50D429407320DED1A77B7059B63D5@US01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com>
References: <20070227230421.96b8bade.adeason2@uiuc.edu>
	<1F64EB1FF8A50D429407320DED1A77B7059B63D5@US01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com>
Message-ID: <20070301003147.6e4b7680.adeason2@uiuc.edu>

I was hoping more for a method of getting some kind of status, with
most output suppressed. This could be achieved with some scripting, as
well, but I was just wondering if there's any kind of solution within
pkg-get, as that would be a lot easier. If not, then... I'll deal.

--
Andrew Deason
adeason2 at uiuc.edu

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:53:43 -0800
"Corey Hart" <Corey.Hart at synopsys.com> wrote:

> For the bourne shell:
>
> pkg-get -f -i <package> > /dev/null 2>&1
>
> ...corey
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org
> > [mailto:users-bounces+corey.hart=synopsys.com at lists.blastwave.org]
> > On Behalf Of Andrew Deason
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:04 PM
> > To: users at lists.blastwave.org
> > Subject: [csw-users] Suppressing pkg-get output?
> >
> > Is there any way to suppress the exorbitant amount of output
> > blastwave outputs when installing a package? I recently was trying
> > an automated Solaris 10 install system we have set up, and one of
> > the automated post-install steps was to install blastwave and
> > several packages from it. However, I was doing this over a serial
> > link, and since several packages output the entire GPL and LGPL
> > when installing, it took quite a bit of time (longer than the
> > entire rest of the install, as I
> recall).
> >
> > Are there any options to make pkg-get quieter (or the underlying
> > pkgadd invocations), or at least to not display the licenses?
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Deason
> > adeason2 at uiuc.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070301/4472abe2/attachment.asc>

From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Sun Mar  4 01:40:35 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:40:35 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>

I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" command
seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
without problems.

The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?

Thanks!
Paul Youngblood



From comand at blastwave.org  Sun Mar  4 06:44:51 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:44:51 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
> to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
> Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" command
> seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
> without problems.
>
> The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
> it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
> via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?

Hi Paul,

If you're running Solaris 10, cswapache2 won't be installed, and you
can use svcadm to manage the cswapache2 service.

HTH,
Cory.


From comand at blastwave.org  Sun Mar  4 06:47:37 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:47:37 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/3/07, Cory Omand <comand at blastwave.org> wrote:
> On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> > I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
> > to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
> > Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" commandO
> > seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
> > without problems.
> >
> > The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
> > it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
> > via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> If you're running Solaris 10, cswapache2 won't be installed, and you
> can use svcadm to manage the cswapache2 service.
>

Apologies -- just re-read your message, and saw that you're actually
running Solaris 9.  There is no reason why cswapache2 wouldn't be
there... I verified that it's part of the package, as installed on our
build servers:

bash$ pkginfo -x CSWapache2 CSWapache2c
CSWapache2            apache2 - Apache 2.2 web server
                      (all) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
                      (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
bash$
bash$ pkgchk -l -p /etc/init.d/cswapache2
Pathname: /etc/init.d/cswapache2
Type: editted file
Expected mode: 0755
Expected owner: root
Expected group: bin
Referenced by the following packages:
        CSWapache2c
Current status: installed

- C.


From mametller at gmail.com  Sun Mar  4 15:54:53 2007
From: mametller at gmail.com (Marcelo)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:54:53 -0300
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <141ad5a60703040654l7ebe2edeq36ab484cc123a56d@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
> to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
> Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" command
> seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
> without problems.
>
> The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
> it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
> via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?
>

Are you sure it's a CSW (Blastware) package ?
or it's a default SUN package ?

In csw package, the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 is in the package: "apache2c"

-- 
Marcelo
http://maramsis.blogspot.com


From zizban at adelphia.net  Sun Mar  4 18:42:35 2007
From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:42:35 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] fvwm2 questions
Message-ID: <50EFE67B-FC2A-4E85-B8FD-4BC9DDB9E98F@adelphia.net>

Where does the .fvwmrc go? I tried putting it in ~ and ~/.fvwm/ but  
to no avail

And where do themes go?

thanks


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Sun Mar  4 23:58:46 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:58:46 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>

Thank you very much for the information and help Cory.  I must
have somehow deleted my /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.

When I run the commands you illustrated:
     bash$ pkginfo -x CSWapache2 CSWapache2c
     bash$ pkgchk -l -p /etc/init.d/cswapache2
I get the exact same output you did.  Do you know if there
is a way to "start over" and do a fresh install?  In an
effort to do just that, I used "pkg-get -r" to successfully
remove ap2_prefork, apache2rt, and apache2.  But I get the
following in attempting removal apache2c:

    bsh# pkg-get -r apache2c
    WARNING:  the remove option is not very intelligent.
    If there are multiple versions of a package with the same
    PKG style name, it will remove the first one it can
    (will continue in 5 seconds)
    Starting remove operations now...

    The following package is currently installed:
       CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
                             (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19

    Do you want to remove this package? [y,n,?,q] y

    ## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
    (A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
    ## Processing package information.
    ## Executing preremove script.
    chroot: No such file or directory
    pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully

    Removal of <CSWapache2c> failed.
    bsh#

I'd be greatful for any direction you might provide.
Paul Youngblood

-----------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Cory Omand wrote:

> On 3/3/07, Cory Omand <comand at blastwave.org> wrote:
>> On 3/3/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
>>> I seem to be missing a small text file that is supposed
>>> to be part of the apache2 package.  I'm running
>>> Solaris 9 (sparc).  The "pkg-add -i apache2" commandO
>>> seemed to work just fine, and the apache2 server works
>>> without problems. 
>>>
>>> The missing file is "/etc/init.d/cswapache2".  I assume
>>> it is a small text file.  Would someone send it to me
>>> via e-mail or suggest a way for me to obtain it, please?
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> If you're running Solaris 10, cswapache2 won't be installed, and you
>> can use svcadm to manage the cswapache2 service.
>>
>
> Apologies -- just re-read your message, and saw that you're actually
> running Solaris 9.  There is no reason why cswapache2 wouldn't be
> there... I verified that it's part of the package, as installed on our
> build servers:
>
> bash$ pkginfo -x CSWapache2 CSWapache2c
> CSWapache2            apache2 - Apache 2.2 web server
>                      (all) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
> CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
>                      (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
> bash$
> bash$ pkgchk -l -p /etc/init.d/cswapache2
> Pathname: /etc/init.d/cswapache2
> Type: editted file
> Expected mode: 0755
> Expected owner: root
> Expected group: bin
> Referenced by the following packages:
>        CSWapache2c
> Current status: installed
>
> - C.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From comand at blastwave.org  Mon Mar  5 03:21:35 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:21:35 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> effort to do just that, I used "pkg-get -r" to successfully
> remove ap2_prefork, apache2rt, and apache2.  But I get the
> following in attempting removal apache2c:
[...]
>     ## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
>     (A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
>     ## Processing package information.
>     ## Executing preremove script.
>     chroot: No such file or directory
>     pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully

Well, it's strange for chroot to not be on your system somewhere...
usually /usr/sbin/chroot, part of SUNWcsu (core solaris)...  You might
check that it's actually installed.  If it's not there, then your
system is very inconsistent.

- C.


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Mon Mar  5 04:27:04 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:27:04 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>

Running pkgchk on SUNWcsu indicates nothing wrong on my system.
I think that /usr/sbin/chroot is complaining that I don't have
the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.  Here is what I get when I
use the pkgrm command directly:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
bsh# pkgrm -v CSWapache2c
The following package is currently installed:
    CSWapache2c           apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core)
                          (sparc) 2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19
Do you want to remove this package? [y,n,?,q] y
## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
(A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user
permission during the process of removing this package.
Do you want to continue with the removal of this package [y,n,?,q] y
## Verifying package dependencies.
## Processing package information.
## Executing preremove script.
+ [ -z  ]
PKG_INSTALL_ROOT=/
STATE_FILE=//var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ rm -f //var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ [ -f //usr/sbin/svccfg -a -f //usr/sbin/svcadm ]
+ chroot / /etc/init.d/cswapache2 stop                    <-----<<<<<
chroot: No such file or directory                         <-----<<<<<
pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

But when I copy an arbitrary text file to /etc/init.d/cswapache2
and give it proper owner, group, and permissions as indicated in
this listing ...

bsh# ls -l /etc/init.d | grep csw
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     bin         3712 Mar  4 21:09 cswapache2
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root     bin          678 Nov  4  2005 cswfconfig
-rwxr-xr-x   6 root     bin         6539 Mar  1 21:24 cswmysql
-rwxr-xr-x   6 root     bin         6545 Mar  1 21:46 cswmysql5
-rwxr-xr-x   6 root     bin         5411 Mar  1 21:23 cswopenldap
bsh#

... and then run "pkgrm -v CSWapache2c" again, I get this:

## Verifying package dependencies.
## Processing package information.
## Executing preremove script.
+ [ -z  ]
PKG_INSTALL_ROOT=/
STATE_FILE=//var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ rm -f //var/tmp/CSWapache2c.smfinfo
+ [ -f //usr/sbin/svccfg -a -f //usr/sbin/svcadm ]
+ chroot / /etc/init.d/cswapache2 stop
chroot: Exec format error
pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully
Removal of <CSWapache2c> failed.
------------------------------------------------------------



On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Cory Omand wrote:

> On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
>> effort to do just that, I used "pkg-get -r" to successfully
>> remove ap2_prefork, apache2rt, and apache2.  But I get the
>> following in attempting removal apache2c:
> [...]
>>     ## Removing installed package instance <CSWapache2c>
>>     (A previous attempt may have been unsuccessful.)
>>     ## Processing package information.
>>     ## Executing preremove script.
>>     chroot: No such file or directory
>>     pkgrm: ERROR: preremove script did not complete successfully
>
> Well, it's strange for chroot to not be on your system somewhere...
> usually /usr/sbin/chroot, part of SUNWcsu (core solaris)...  You might
> check that it's actually installed.  If it's not there, then your
> system is very inconsistent.
>
> - C.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From comand at blastwave.org  Mon Mar  5 05:43:14 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:43:14 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> Running pkgchk on SUNWcsu indicates nothing wrong on my system.
> I think that /usr/sbin/chroot is complaining that I don't have
> the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.  Here is what I get when I
> use the pkgrm command directly:

Ok, now I see.  If you add #!/bin/sh or something similar to the top
of your empty cswapache2 file, and make it executable, it should allow
you to remove the package.

- C.


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Mon Mar  5 21:55:37 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:55:37 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>

Hi Cory,

Yes, putting "#!/bin/sh" at the top of the text file worked
perfectly, thank you!   This  means all of these CSW packages
have been removed: apache2c, apache2rt, apache2, and ap2prefork.
However, I still had to manually remove the "bogus" text file
"/etc/init.d/cswapache2" and the symbolic links to it in the
/etc directories rc0.d, rc1.d, rc2.d, rc3.d, and rcS.d.

Finally, to start all over, I ran "pkg-get install apache2" which
installed ap2prefork, apache2rt, and apache2, but could only
partially install apache2c.  Here is the error (which you can see in
proper context in the abbreviated screen output log which follows:

ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
        pathname does not exist.

I'm not sure what this means.  Why won't the install of apache2c
create cswapache2 in /etc/init.d?   The directory certainly exists
and the install re-created all the symbolic links, but these links
point to a file which is not there:

bsh# ls -ld /etc/init.d
drwxr-xr-x   2 root     sys         2048 Mar  5 12:26 /etc/init.d
bsh# ls -oR /etc | grep cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 S50cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     20 Mar  5 12:56 K16cswapache2 ->
                                                 ../init.d/cswapache2
bsh#


Thank you for all your help on this, Cory.  I appologize for taking
up your time.
Paul Youngblood


=========== Begin abbreviated output log ====================
bsh# pkg-get install apache2
No existing install of CSWapache2 found. Installing...
Trying ftp://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/sparc/5.9/
                      apache2-2.2.4,REV=2007.02.19-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Analysing special files...
Trying to install dependancy apache2c
No existing install of CSWapache2c found. Installing...
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Analysing special files...
Hmmm. Retrying with different archive offset...4217 blocks
Trying to install dependancy apache2rt
No existing install of CSWapache2rt found. Installing...
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installation of <CSWapache2rt> was successful.
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installing apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core) as <CSWapache2c>
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.gif
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.png
[ verifying class <none> ]
/etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
[ verifying class <init> ]
ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed  <--<<<<
     pathname does not exist                                       <--<<<<
## Executing postinstall script.
Checking configuration files:
Creating /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf from template
Creating /opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-ssl.conf from template
Copying CSW templates:
   creating /opt/csw/apache2/share/htdocs/index.html
<><><> skipped lines <><><>
   creating /opt/csw/apache2/etc/mime.types

Installation of <CSWapache2c> partially failed.                   <--<<<<
ERROR: could not add CSWapache2c.                                 <--<<<<
Trying to install dependancy ap2_prefork
No existing install of CSWap2prefork found. Installing...
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installation of <CSWap2prefork> was successful.
<><><> skipped lines <><><>

Installation of <CSWapache2> was successful.
bsh#
==============================================================

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Cory Omand wrote:

> On 3/4/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
>> Running pkgchk on SUNWcsu indicates nothing wrong on my system.
>> I think that /usr/sbin/chroot is complaining that I don't have
>> the /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file.  Here is what I get when I
>> use the pkgrm command directly:
>
> Ok, now I see.  If you add #!/bin/sh or something similar to the top
> of your empty cswapache2 file, and make it executable, it should allow
> you to remove the package.
>
> - C.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From comand at blastwave.org  Tue Mar  6 06:16:30 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:16:30 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/5/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
>         pathname does not exist.

It appears that you have somehow confused your system's package
database.  This can be (very carefully, as root) corrected by hand, by
first removing all of the apache2 packages.  Then, remove lines which
refer to cswapache2 (as well as any CSWapache2*/CSWap2* packages) from
/var/sadm/install/contents.  Finally, ensure that no
CSWapache2*/CSWap2* directories remain in /var/sadm/pkg.  Once that's
all done, you should be able to re-add the packages.  I'm not sure how
you got where you are today, but it's certainly not standard operating
procedure :).

- C.


From pfelecan at blastwave.org  Tue Mar  6 14:41:55 2007
From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:41:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Emacs 22 snapshot 20070301 CVS
Message-ID: <x6odn6biak.fsf@abhavana.free.fr>

The monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, is in the
testing area:

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.95,REV=cvs20070301-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.95,REV=cvs20070301-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But,
if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the
packaging side.

To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and
Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the
CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user,
the nifty AucTex package.

Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and
emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously
separate, packages --- e.g., tramp.

I'll made a new testing package the next month.

Enjoy
-- 
Peter


From youngbp at email.uah.edu  Thu Mar  8 22:28:13 2007
From: youngbp at email.uah.edu (Paul N. Youngblood)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:28:13 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>


> It appears that you have somehow confused your system's package
> database.  This can be (very carefully, as root) corrected by hand, by
> first removing all of the apache2 packages.  Then, remove lines which
> refer to cswapache2 (as well as any CSWapache2*/CSWap2* packages) from
> /var/sadm/install/contents.  Finally, ensure that no
> CSWapache2*/CSWap2* directories remain in /var/sadm/pkg.  Once that's
> all done, you should be able to re-add the packages.  I'm not sure how

Cory, I'm still unable to get the apache2c install to create
the "/etc/init.d/cswapache2" file, and I've tried more than once
using the procedure you were kind enough to provide.  I removed all
of the CSWapache2* and CSWap2* packages using pkgrm, and checked the
/var/sadm/install/contents file -- there were no references left
to any CSWapache2* or CSWap2* packages.  I edited the file anyway
and removed the two comment lines at the bottom which referenced
the CSWapache2c package.  Also, got rid of any CSWapache2* and
CSWap2* dirs in /var/sadm/pkg, and removed the /etc/initd.cswapache2
file (the bogus one that must be in place to successfully do the
"pkgrm CSWapache2c" command) and all symbolic links to it in the
/etc/rc*.d directories.  Then I did a fresh install of CSWapache2rt
followed by CSWapache2c.  The result appeared to be the same as before.

Should I have rebooted the system immediately prior to re-installation?
Maybe there is a memory buffer somewhere that confuses the installation.

Is it possible that some other package catalog/repository file (either
blastwave or solaris) exists with incorrect information in it?

Should I try removing even more of the blastwave packages next time
(like CSWcommon) in order to start with a "cleaner" slate?

I noticed that when I do a "pkg-get install CSWapache" and compare its
output to that of the CSWapache2c install (see below),  the CSWapache
install seems to indicate the creation of a /etc/init.d/cswapache file
and its links immediately after the "## Installing part 1 of 1." line.
But the CSWapache2c install shows no reference to the cswapache2 file
until after the line "[ verifying class <none> ]", and even then only
mentions the links themselves, not the file.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
First, this is from the cswapache install:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

bsh# pkg-get install apache
No existing install of CSWapache found. Installing...
...   ...   ...
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
    4 package pathnames are already properly installed.

Installing apache - apache webserver with mod_ssl included as <CSWapache>

## Installing part 1 of 1.                         <-----<<<
/etc/init.d/cswapache                              <-----<<<
/etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>            <-----<<<
/etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>
/etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>
/etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache <symbolic link>
/etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache <symbolic link>
/opt/csw/apache/bin/ab
/opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl
/opt/csw/apache/bin/apxs


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is from the cswapache2c install:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

bsh# pkg-get install apache2c
No existing install of CSWapache2c found. Installing...
...   ...   ...
## Executing checkinstall script.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
    15 package pathnames are already properly installed.

Installing apache2c - Apache 2.2 web server (core) as <CSWapache2c>

## Installing part 1 of 1.
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-autoindex.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-dav.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-default.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-info.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-languages.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.CSW
/opt/csw/apache2/etc/extra/httpd-multilang-errordoc.conf.CSW
...   ...   ...
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world1.png
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.gif
/opt/csw/apache2/share/icons/world2.png
[ verifying class <none> ]                      <-----<<<
/etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>        <-----<<<
/etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
/etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
[ verifying class <init> ]
ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
     pathname does not exist



Paul Youngblood



From james at blastwave.org  Thu Mar  8 23:14:44 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:14:44 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <20070308.22144400.1746965301@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 08/03/07, 21:28:13, Paul "N." Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote 
regarding Re: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file:

> Cory, I'm still unable to get the apache2c install to create
> the "/etc/init.d/cswapache2" file, and I've tried more than once

Paul, I confirm your error, I too cannot install CSWapache2.  It's
late now, I'll do an investigation in the morning and see if I can
find out why.



> /etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> [ verifying class <init> ]
> ERROR: attribute verification of </etc/init.d/cswapache2> failed
>      pathname does not exist

Yes, the same error for me.




James.


From comand at blastwave.org  Thu Mar  8 23:57:49 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:57:49 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703081457v73ba48ddiacf1eae0a90726f5@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/8/07, Paul N. Youngblood <youngbp at email.uah.edu> wrote:
> [ verifying class <none> ]                      <-----<<<
> /etc/rc0.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>        <-----<<<
> /etc/rc1.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rc2.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rc3.d/S50cswapache2 <symbolic link>
> /etc/rcS.d/K16cswapache2 <symbolic link>

This is most certainly a bug, one which may have been hiding due to
another bug.  I am rebuilding right now, to see if I can find out what
is really happening here...  I'll follow with details as soon as I
figure out what's wrong.

- C.


From james at blastwave.org  Fri Mar  9 11:30:33 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:30:33 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <20070308.22144400.1746965301@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032144s25041c17uc64b9a96235f682c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
	<20070308.22144400.1746965301@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20070309.10303300.505232199@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 08/03/07, 22:14:44, James Lee <james at blastwave.org> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file:

> > Cory, I'm still unable to get the apache2c install to create
> > the "/etc/init.d/cswapache2" file, and I've tried more than once

> Paul, I confirm your error, I too cannot install CSWapache2.  It's
> late now, I'll do an investigation in the morning and see if I can
> find out why.

Good morning all, the problem is with i.init.  cswapache2 has pkgmap
entry: 

1 e init /etc/init.d/cswapache2 0755 root bin 807 59067 1171862731

The 'e' mean the file in the package is an editable script used for
building the installed file, the file is being fed to the init class
action scipt but is failing.  Yann, this is your script, perhaps you
will look at this problem.


On removal preremove fails and baulks pkgrm because it returns non-zero.
Add "exit 0" to the end of /var/sadm/pkg/CSWapache2c/install/preremove
to allow pkgrm to run:

# echo "exit 0" >> /var/sadm/pkg/CSWapache2c/install/preremove




James.



From deluca at med.unc.edu  Fri Mar  9 20:31:26 2007
From: deluca at med.unc.edu (Tony DeLuca)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:31:26 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] updated python packates
Message-ID: <45F1B60E.3000607@med.unc.edu>

Hi All,
Does anyone know the status for the new version of python (2.4.* or 
2.5.*) packages? The maintainer said around Oct 06 that they would be 
released shortly. Thanks in advance.


-- 
Tony



From comand at blastwave.org  Sat Mar 10 00:56:52 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:56:52 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Missing /etc/init.d/cswapache2 file
In-Reply-To: <ffd485d70703081457v73ba48ddiacf1eae0a90726f5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703031812190.28776@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703032147v170629c1s9d71c89d99380ac2@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703041452260.22726@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703041821p5ace9724q9d9bdf03fb3ad312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703042029310.21643@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703042043h4b2b7813l5f1940a36298d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703051304480.17385@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703052116m2625e987p3ed5ca677d82d78@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0703071918500.19910@email.uah.edu>
	<ffd485d70703081457v73ba48ddiacf1eae0a90726f5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703091556w72946b3cl39fed20e8ed2dd17@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/8/07, Cory Omand <comand at blastwave.org> wrote:
> This is most certainly a bug, one which may have been hiding due to
> another bug.  I am rebuilding right now, to see if I can find out what
> is really happening here...  I'll follow with details as soon as I
> figure out what's wrong.

Thanks to James and Yann for tracking down the root cause of this
issue.  There were a couple of problems, but generally, it was a
problem with the 'init' install class.  This was fixed in the build
system generic SMF/init support, and new apache2c packages are now
staged for release.  If anyone is interested, the fix is in r1108
(http://svn.blastwave.org/trac/changeset/1108).

- C.


From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil  Mon Mar 12 16:03:47 2007
From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt Josh Civ 519 SMXS/MXDEB)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:03:47 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
Message-ID: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C1664@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>

Hi,

 

It looks like the stable branch is missing a bunch of packages for gnome.  I
don't see gnome_dtlogin, gnome_session and others.  Is gnome broken in the
stable branch or am I missing something?

 

Josh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070312/d4fd2baa/attachment-0001.html>

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 12 16:22:20 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
In-Reply-To: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C1664@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil
	>
References: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C1664@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>
Message-ID: <56536.72.39.216.186.1173712940.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Hi,
>
>
>
> It looks like the stable branch is missing a bunch of packages for gnome.  I
> don't see gnome_dtlogin, gnome_session and others.  Is gnome broken in the
> stable branch or am I missing something?

  I guess I better look into that.

  A pkg-get -i gnome from the unstable branch should complete.

  What mirror are you using ?

Dennis



From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil  Mon Mar 12 17:23:59 2007
From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt Josh Civ 519 SMXS/MXDEB)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:23:59 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
Message-ID: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C17C9@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>

I don't recall which mirror I am using.  I use Blastwave on an isolated
network so I have to make a complete mirror myself and use that anyway.  I
checked several of the mirrors and the list of packages released with the
2007.01 release; they were all missing several packages from gnome.  It does
not seem to be confined to a single mirror.  

Last I tried running Gnome from unstable I had a lot of problems, is
unstable Gnome working ok now?

Thanks,

Josh
 

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 9:22 AM
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?


> Hi,
>
>
>
> It looks like the stable branch is missing a bunch of packages for gnome.
I
> don't see gnome_dtlogin, gnome_session and others.  Is gnome broken in the
> stable branch or am I missing something?

  I guess I better look into that.

  A pkg-get -i gnome from the unstable branch should complete.

  What mirror are you using ?

Dennis

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 12 17:51:31 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:51:31 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Is stable gnome missing packages?
In-Reply-To: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C17C9@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>
References: <7EAE6D929544CF4BAF04573ABC817AD30D6C17C9@fskrsm32.hill.afmc.ds.af.mil>
Message-ID: <20070312.16513100.1626410050@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 12/03/07, 16:23:59, Leavitt Josh Civ 519 SMXS/MXDEB 
<Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil> wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Is stable gnome 
missing packages?:

> Last I tried running Gnome from unstable I had a lot of problems,

Yes, that is why it didn't get put into stable.


> is unstable Gnome working ok now?

Unstable gnome should be usable, there might be the odd missing
links, clock applet, maybe evolution to firefox libs is broken.



James.


From theyaga at gmail.com  Tue Mar 13 04:30:51 2007
From: theyaga at gmail.com (S.Theyagarajan )
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:00:51 +0530
Subject: [csw-users] Installing CVS
Message-ID: <19d5c040703122030s1ac153bne5082c105ca7a633@mail.gmail.com>

hi all ,
          I tried installing cvs on my SUN machine using pkg-get. But it
failed
Iam pasting the output

bash-3.00# pkg-get -i cvs
./pkg-get[1820]: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable:  not found
No existing install of CSWcvs found. Installing...
Trying
http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/csw/unstable/sparc/5.11/cvs-1.11.22,REV=2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
--19:56:59--
http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/csw/unstable/sparc/5.11/cvs-1.11.22,REV=2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
           => `cvs-1.11.22,REV=2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'
Connecting to 10.0.0.101:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [text/html]

    [ <=>                                 ] 1,644
--.--K/s

19:57:23 (49.00 MB/s) - `cvs-1.11.22,REV=
2006.12.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' saved [1644]

mkdir: Failed to make directory "/var/pkg-get/downloads/"; File exists
ERROR: could not verify downloaded file correctly
bash-3.00#


Anyone could explain what has gone wrong ? and what i could do about it.
-- 
thanks
taggy
http://freeshell.in/~taggy/blog
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.Theyagarajan
Under Graduate
Department Of Computer Science And Engineering
National Institute Of Technology , Trichirapalli
India 620015
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070313/9c1c8d66/attachment-0001.html>

From jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk  Tue Mar 13 10:15:27 2007
From: jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Boyd)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:15:27 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Printing with seamonkey 1.1.1
Message-ID: <20070313091527.C212453A6D@webmail219.herald.ox.ac.uk>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070313/9946c290/attachment-0001.ksh>

From ihsan at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 13 14:35:02 2007
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:35:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] some information about amavisd
Message-ID: <45F6A886.7060502@blastwave.org>

Hello,

This affects you only, if you are using the unstable distribution. If
you are using stable, you can ignore this e-mail.

If you have upgraded lately to the newest Perl from unstable, you have
got probably something like that, when you tried to start amavisd-new:

# ./amavisd-new start
Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't load
'/opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/auto/BerkeleyDB/BerkeleyDB.so' for module
BerkeleyDB: ld.so.1: perl: fatal: libdb-4.3.so: open failed: No such
file or directory at /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8/XSLoader.pm line 70.
at (eval 45) line 14
Compilation failed in require at (eval 45) line 14.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 45) line 14.
Undefined subroutine &BerkeleyDB::Term::close_everything called at
/opt/csw/lib/perl/csw/BerkeleyDB.pm line 1675.
END failed--call queue aborted.

This is because pm_berkeleydb (amavisd_new depends on it) is using
Berkeley DB 4.3 while the newest Perl is using 4.4. If you are
experiencing this problem, please upgrade pm_berkeleydb and amavisd_new
from testing:

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_berkeleydb-0.31,REV=2007.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_berkeleydb-0.31,REV=2007.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/amavisd_new-2.4.5,REV=2007.03.12-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

IMPORTANT: Please upgrade amavisd_new as well. The postinstall script of
the amavisd_new package will upgrade your db files to 4.4.

I've got already two positive reports from users. If don't get any
negative reports, those two packages are going to the unstable tree by
the end of this week.



Ihsan


-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/
			http://gallery.dogan.ch/
	 		http://ihsan.dogan.ch/


From lscharf at vt.edu  Tue Mar 13 21:16:04 2007
From: lscharf at vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:16:04 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
Message-ID: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu>

Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged 
on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?

It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)

Thanks,
-Luke

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070313/c7374630/attachment-0001.bin>

From Thomas.Baca at NAU.EDU  Thu Mar 15 21:08:02 2007
From: Thomas.Baca at NAU.EDU (Thomas L Baca)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:08:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
Message-ID: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

How dangerous is it to mix non-blastwave-packaged perl modules into a
blastwave Perl installation?

I am relatively new to blastwave's perl packages, having rolled my own
installations over the years and having maintained them with the cpan
module in recent years.

I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to what
extent that locks me into only those modules that are available as
packages.

Any advice out there?

thanks,
-tom


From shuttlebox at gmail.com  Thu Mar 15 22:26:06 2007
From: shuttlebox at gmail.com (shuttlebox)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:26:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
In-Reply-To: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <625385e30703151426s4a949ddfobb91991ad7ad7b81@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/15/07, Thomas L Baca <Thomas.Baca at nau.edu> wrote:
> How dangerous is it to mix non-blastwave-packaged perl modules into a
> blastwave Perl installation?
>
> I am relatively new to blastwave's perl packages, having rolled my own
> installations over the years and having maintained them with the cpan
> module in recent years.
>
> I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to what
> extent that locks me into only those modules that are available as
> packages.
>
> Any advice out there?

Assuming you start CPAN from Blastwave's Perl you should be OK but it
would be better if you built the missing modules for Blastwave or
requested them. You can do the latter here:
http://www.blastwave.org/pkgreq.php.

What modules are you interested in?

-- 
/peter


From comand at blastwave.org  Thu Mar 15 23:32:55 2007
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:32:55 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
In-Reply-To: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70703151532x7b6226bbhfaf2fa77dcbb55d5@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/15/07, Thomas L Baca <Thomas.Baca at nau.edu> wrote:
> How dangerous is it to mix non-blastwave-packaged perl modules into a
> blastwave Perl installation?
>
> I am relatively new to blastwave's perl packages, having rolled my own
> installations over the years and having maintained them with the cpan
> module in recent years.
>
> I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to what
> extent that locks me into only those modules that are available as
> packages.

The only thing that you'll be locked into at the moment is the need to
use the same compiler as Perl itself was compiled with -- Sun Studio
11.  Other than that, you should be able to use CPAN/CPANPLUS (coming
soon) to add any additional modules.  Of course, if you're doing a lot
of clean installs, you would need to package your locally built
modules yourself... so making a package request, as was separately
requested, is probably better.

- C.


From aaron at ernieball.com  Thu Mar 15 23:37:33 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:37:33 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <10f0b5e5919.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>
References: <10f0b5e5919.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>
Message-ID: <45F9CAAD.1090808@ernieball.com>

Sorry to bring this one back from the grave...

I got sidetracked and moved onto more important things.

Yes still having problems even with the dependencies met

The gtk I have is 2.10.1,REV=2006.08.08

Aaron

Alessio Cervellin wrote:
> So you still have the problem even after installing all the 
> dependencies?
> Anyway the missing lib shown in the error you say is in 
> CSWgtk2
>
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: aaron at ernieball.com
> Data: 21-
> nov-2006 4.51 PM
> A: "questions and discussions"<users at lists.blastwave.
> org>
> Ogg: Re: [csw-users] Evince
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.
> org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Fri Mar 16 00:15:21 2007
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:15:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] non-blastwave perl modules?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30703151426s4a949ddfobb91991ad7ad7b81@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17913.42914.608410.841042@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<625385e30703151426s4a949ddfobb91991ad7ad7b81@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070315181521.00000657@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:26:06 +0100
shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote:

> > I like the convenience of blastwave packages, but I'm not sure to
> > what extent that locks me into only those modules that are
> > available as packages.

In addition to what Cory said, be sure to install to the site
directory.  Blastwave packages should be going into the vendor
directories and not touch the site directories.

Looking at @INC, site is above vendor.  So if you want to use modules
from blastwave that you have installed into the site directories, you
will need to uninstall what you added to the site directories.

Alex


-- 


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Fri Mar 16 09:29:36 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:29:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] how to enable gdm on solaris 10, 11?
Message-ID: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
on my laptop, Sun gdm (JDS?) is enabled.
I just installed gdm from blastwave, but don't understand how to enable it.
on "News for CSW package 'gdm'", Ken Mays wrote:
Installation:

Please consult README.install for instructions on how to
configure and install GDM.

but there no README in the gdm package. And svcs only show gdm from sun
Anybody can help?

thanks in advance,

gerard


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Fri Mar 16 09:33:48 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] how to enable gdm on solaris 10, 11?
In-Reply-To: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <45FA566C.7030709@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

G?rard Henry wrote:
> hello all,
> on my laptop, Sun gdm (JDS?) is enabled.
> I just installed gdm from blastwave, but don't understand how to enable it.
> on "News for CSW package 'gdm'", Ken Mays wrote:

another strange thing:
Contact:

The GDM mail list is gdm-list at gnome.org. Archives can be found here:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/
and on this url:

Search mail.gnome.org

NOTICE (2006-07-08): We're re-building the archive search indexes 
(again). It bombed out silently last time leaving lockfiles in place 
(and archives unsearchable). Please bear with us while we try to get it 
sorted out. -- GNOME sysadmin team.

This index contains lots of documents and lots of keywords.

Last modified: 2006-07-08

nothing has changed since 2006???


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Fri Mar 16 10:09:08 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:09:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] how to enable gdm on solaris 10, 11?
In-Reply-To: <45FA566C.7030709@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <45FA5570.6090305@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<45FA566C.7030709@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <45FA5EB4.4060006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

ok, here is the solution:

in /usr/share/xsessions, there are CDE.desktop and gnome.desktop, by 
default.
cp gnome.desktop xfce.desktop
and xfce.desktop contains:
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Name=Xfce 4.2 Session
Comment=Use this session to run Xfce 4.2 as your desktop environment
Exec=/usr/bin/ctrun -l child -i none /etc/dt/config/Xinitrc.CSWxfce
TryExec=/usr/bin/ctrun -l child -i none /etc/dt/config/Xinitrc.CSWxfce
# no icon yet, only the top three are currently used
Icon=/opt/csw/share/pixmaps/xfce4_xicon1.png
Type=Application


why don't include this file in your package?


From mark.round at gmail.com  Fri Mar 16 22:30:27 2007
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:30:27 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Updated PostgreSQL 8.2.3 packages
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Just a heads up - updated PostgreSQL packages will be heading out to
the unstable tree soon. For anyone running prior versions, you will
need to do a dump & reload cycle when upgrading - otherwise your
databases will NOT work. This cycle is covered in the online
documentation, essential just do a pg_dumpall BEFORE upgrading, and
afterwards create a new data directory then reload the resulting SQL.

Links for the documentation :
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/backup-dump.html

-Mark


From aaron at ernieball.com  Fri Mar 16 23:51:07 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (aaron at ernieball.com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:51:07 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com>

I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even after updating
the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?


From griffous at griffous.net  Sat Mar 17 11:30:47 2007
From: griffous at griffous.net (Jonathan Wheeler)
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:30:47 +1300
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>

aaron at ernieball.com wrote:
> I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even after updating
> the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?

Hi Aaron,

Amarok has only just been submitted to the Blastwave admins over the 
past couple of days.
I don't fully understand the mirroring process myself, but I'd expect 
that if it's made it as far as the unstable list, it won't be far away!

If you can't wait, email me off-list and I'll be happy to give you a 
link to the package, otherwise as I've mentioned, hopefully it'll be 
working under the normal channels real-soon-now... :)

Jonathan
Amarok Maintainer


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Sat Mar 17 18:41:04 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:41:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com> <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>
Message-ID: <33889.72.39.216.186.1174153264.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> aaron at ernieball.com wrote:
>> I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even after
>> updating
>> the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Amarok has only just been submitted to the Blastwave admins over the
> past couple of days.

yes .. please don't hold your breath but .. feel free to check the big
mirror sites in the next 24 hours.

the x86 version can be had manually from :

http://www.blastwave.org/testing/amarok-1.4.4,REV=2007.03.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

but in a very short while it will be at

http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/

okay ?

Dennis Clarke                 dclarke at blastwave.org
Director Blastwave.org        http://www.blastwave.org
 ----------------------------------------------------
Further Info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blastwave



From aaron at ernieball.com  Sun Mar 18 08:15:02 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (aaron at ernieball.com)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [csw-users] Amarok?
In-Reply-To: <33889.72.39.216.186.1174153264.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <7b46f0de0703161430q35fc5878l81c2d04ef23f9a9f@mail.gmail.com>
	<fcf5f06c1f30.45fb1f5b@ernieball.com> <45FBC357.30705@griffous.net>
	<33889.72.39.216.186.1174153264.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <f719d20e875.45fce6f6@ernieball.com>

Literally within 5 minutes of sending that email it dawned on me to check the
testing page. At work run 100% Solaris. at home Ubuntu. Just decided to switch
to OpenSolaris at home/research it for work so I know what is in store for
Solaris 11. Almost built Amarok from source for purely personal reasons. Gotta
have your music :) Went to bed woke up and it was on blastwave. Still have to
figure out intricacies of kde apps in Solaris. Used to gnome and running kde
apps in gnome and on Linux only. All in all awesome package though. Works great.
Now if I could only figure out why gftp seems to download really slow. Gotta get
my music off another device that only has ftp access. Another topic, another time...


Thanks for the really sweet port. 

----- Original Message -----
From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke at blastwave.org>
Date: Saturday, March 17, 2007 10:41 am
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Amarok?

> 
> > aaron at ernieball.com wrote:
> >> I see Amarok on the unstable list but pkg-get can't find it even 
> after>> updating
> >> the catalog. Is this happening to anyone else?
> >
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > Amarok has only just been submitted to the Blastwave admins over the
> > past couple of days.
> 
> yes .. please don't hold your breath but .. feel free to check the big
> mirror sites in the next 24 hours.
> 
> the x86 version can be had manually from :
> 
> http://www.blastwave.org/testing/amarok-1.4.4,REV=2007.03.14-
> SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> but in a very short while it will be at
> 
> http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/
> 
> okay ?
> 
> Dennis Clarke                 dclarke at blastwave.org
> Director Blastwave.org        http://www.blastwave.org
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Further Info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blastwave
> 
> 


From aaron at ernieball.com  Mon Mar 19 19:32:49 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:32:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <45F9CAAD.1090808@ernieball.com>
References: <10f0b5e5919.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>
	<45F9CAAD.1090808@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <45FED751.5060206@ernieball.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070319/fbf4bc36/attachment-0001.html>

From andepiel45 at hotmail.com  Mon Mar 19 19:45:59 2007
From: andepiel45 at hotmail.com (Andepiel)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:45:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] KDE repos
Message-ID: <45FEDA67.8030704@hotmail.com>


  Hi:

   I am pretty new in Solaris. I have problems trying to find a good
list of repositories, since there are a lot of packages missing on my
system.

   Summarizing, I am looking for:

LIST OF REPOSITORIES FOR PKG-GET

    I would like to have access to:

    -> KDE packages (KDE, amarok, ...).
    -> GNU libraries (such as gcc2l, gpg and so on).
    -> Mozilla Packages (thunderbird, firefox, ...)
    -> Opera packages

    It looks like that there are so few repositories for openSolaris.

    I guess Java, eclipse and so on are already on the default repos.


ENABLING ADMINTOOL

  For having some kind of GUI based package manager. It is a pitty that
smart do not work yet with BSD ports (for this branch of Unix).


PKG-GET CONFIG FILE

  I was expecting some kind of sources.list (pkg-get.conf) but I don't
know how to work with this file, since whatever the change I made, it is
always consulting same repos.

   I tried also this way:

    pkg-get -s URL -U

    Results is that upgrade the catalog, but nothing happens: same list
of packages and download packages from the same place.

     Is there anyway to enable several repos?

  Thanks,

C?sar







		
______________________________________________ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com


From ihsan at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 12:12:48 2007
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:12:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>

Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:

> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
> 
> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)

What exactly is "watch"?



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/
			http://gallery.dogan.ch/
	 		http://ihsan.dogan.ch/


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 20 14:19:30 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <45FED751.5060206@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <807316.82365.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Updated the gtk from testing. Getting an entirely new
error now. Selecting Print no longer crashes the
program. I can see a list of my printers now. I select
one and hit print and I get a dialog box that says
"Too many failed attempts" or from command line "**
(evince:3077): WARNING **: Error result: Too many
failed attempts"

Evince itself shows a dialog box that just says "Too
many failed attempts"

Aaron Wilson wrote: 
Sorry to bring this one back from the grave...

I got sidetracked and moved onto more important
things.

Yes still having problems even with the dependencies
met

The gtk I have is 2.10.1,REV=2006.08.08

Aaron
----------------------------------

Aaron,

Are you using GTK2-2.10.11 in /testing?? The older
one was buggy so we are in the process of replacing
it.

As for Evince, ar you able to print using other
programs?

~K





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!  
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/


From listen at alexander.skwar.name  Tue Mar 20 14:13:55 2007
From: listen at alexander.skwar.name (Alexander Skwar)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [csw-users] Socksify (dante): ld.so.1: rsync: fatal:
	/opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
Message-ID: <loom.20070320T141117-102@post.gmane.org>

Hi!

I just installed dante (dante-1.1.14,REV=2005.01.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW and
libsocks-1.1.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW) on a 

askwar at winpc000220 ~ $ uname -a
SunOS winpc000220 5.9 Generic_118558-26 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100

system. I'm interested in the socksify script, which I try to use:

askwar at winpc000220 ~/.ssh $ socksify rsync rsync://rsync.gtlib.gatech.edu/gentoo
ld.so.1: rsync: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
Killed

Well, no luck ;)

Am I doing something wrong?

Best regards,
Alexander Skwar



From lscharf at vt.edu  Tue Mar 20 14:21:48 2007
From: lscharf at vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:21:48 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>

Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:
>
>   
>> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
>> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
>>
>> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)
>>     
>
> What exactly is "watch"?
>   

It's a program that will run a command repeatedly, displaying the 
command on the screen.  For example:
    watch -n 2 'gls -lh $HOME/download'
This will run "gls -lh $HOME/download" every two seconds and display the 
results on the screen in a cleanish way.

I wouldn't want to use it to run 'rm -rf' -- but it really is nice for 
watching large downloads, RAID rebuilds, zpool scrubs, df, and suchlike.

I'll be happy to contribute some work for this package, but I'm not 
quite sure where to start -- or if this really belongs in another 
package.  (I'm C/C++/make/scripting and Unix literate, but I haven't 
contributed packages  to a group like this before.)

-Luke

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/0f610d3b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/0f610d3b/attachment-0001.bin>

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 14:29:54 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Ihsan Dogan wrote:
>> Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:
>>
>>
>>> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
>>> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
>>>
>>> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)
>>>
>>
>> What exactly is "watch"?
>>
>
> It's a program that will run a command repeatedly, displaying the
> command on the screen.  For example:
>     watch -n 2 'gls -lh $HOME/download'
> This will run "gls -lh $HOME/download" every two seconds and display the
> results on the screen in a cleanish way.
>
> I wouldn't want to use it to run 'rm -rf' -- but it really is nice for
> watching large downloads, RAID rebuilds, zpool scrubs, df, and suchlike.
>
> I'll be happy to contribute some work for this package, but I'm not
> quite sure where to start -- or if this really belongs in another
> package.  (I'm C/C++/make/scripting and Unix literate, but I haven't
> contributed packages  to a group like this before.)

I like it.

Where is the source ?  On the RHEL5 source CD ISO images or somewhere ?

Dennis



From james at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 15:13:00 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:00 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Socksify (dante): ld.so.1: rsync: fatal:
 /opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
In-Reply-To: <loom.20070320T141117-102@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20070320T141117-102@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <20070320.14130000.2554442981@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 20/03/07, 13:13:55, Alexander Skwar <listen at alexander.skwar.name> wrote 
regarding [csw-users] Socksify (dante): ld.so.1: rsync: fatal: 
/opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32:

> askwar at winpc000220 ~/.ssh $ socksify rsync 
rsync://rsync.gtlib.gatech.edu/gentoo
> ld.so.1: rsync: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so: wrong ELF class: 
ELFCLASS32
> Killed

rsync is isaexec invoked.  It will run as a 64 bit binary.
/opt/csw/lib/libdsocks.so is a 32 bit lib.

I suspect /opt/csw/bin/socksify is preloading the 32bit lib but
execcing a 64bit binary.  Try naming the 32bit rsync (untested):


$ socksify /opt/csw/bin/sparcv8/rsync rsync://rsyn...




James.


From aaron at ernieball.com  Tue Mar 20 15:14:34 2007
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:14:34 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Evince
In-Reply-To: <807316.82365.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <807316.82365.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <45FFEC4A.3020905@ernieball.com>

using GTK2-2.10.11 in /testing

Yes I can print from other programs.



ken mays wrote:
> Updated the gtk from testing. Getting an entirely new
> error now. Selecting Print no longer crashes the
> program. I can see a list of my printers now. I select
> one and hit print and I get a dialog box that says
> "Too many failed attempts" or from command line "**
> (evince:3077): WARNING **: Error result: Too many
> failed attempts"
>
> Evince itself shows a dialog box that just says "Too
> many failed attempts"
>
> Aaron Wilson wrote: 
> Sorry to bring this one back from the grave...
>
> I got sidetracked and moved onto more important
> things.
>
> Yes still having problems even with the dependencies
> met
>
> The gtk I have is 2.10.1,REV=2006.08.08
>
> Aaron
> ----------------------------------
>
> Aaron,
>
> Are you using GTK2-2.10.11 in /testing?? The older
> one was buggy so we are in the process of replacing
> it.
>
> As for Evince, ar you able to print using other
> programs?
>
> ~K
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> It's here! Your new message!  
> Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


From lscharf at vt.edu  Tue Mar 20 15:18:32 2007
From: lscharf at vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:18:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
	<35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>

Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Ihsan Dogan wrote:
>>     
>>> Am 13.3.2007 21:16 Uhr, Luke Scharf schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Has anyone considered including watch (included in the procps packaged
>>>> on Redhat-ish distributions) in pkg-get?
>>>>
>>>> It's one of my favorite trivialities...  :-)
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> What exactly is "watch"?
>>>
>>>       
>> It's a program that will run a command repeatedly, displaying the
>> command on the screen.  For example:
>>     watch -n 2 'gls -lh $HOME/download'
>> This will run "gls -lh $HOME/download" every two seconds and display the
>> results on the screen in a cleanish way.
>>
>> I wouldn't want to use it to run 'rm -rf' -- but it really is nice for
>> watching large downloads, RAID rebuilds, zpool scrubs, df, and suchlike.
>>
>> I'll be happy to contribute some work for this package, but I'm not
>> quite sure where to start -- or if this really belongs in another
>> package.  (I'm C/C++/make/scripting and Unix literate, but I haven't
>> contributed packages  to a group like this before.)
>>     
>
> I like it.
>
> Where is the source ?  On the RHEL5 source CD ISO images or somewhere ?
>   

It's been included as part of the base distribution (and part of the 
source) -- I don't remember when it was introduced, but it's probably 
been around at least as long as RH9.  One source RPM is available here:
    
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/6/source/SRPMS/procps-3.2.7-8.src.rpm
Also, an RHEL5ish version is available here (It should also be available 
on the RHEL5 source CDs):
    http://beta.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/procps-3.2.7-8.src.rpm
I'm actually running YellowDog Linux 4.1 on my Linux desktop at work at 
the moment, which is based on Fedora Core 3, I think.  Here is the exact 
SRPM that I'm using today:
    
ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/yellowdog/releases/yellowdog-4.1/en/os/SRPMS/procps-3.2.0-1.2.ydl.1.src.rpm

BTW, there is a fair bit of stuff in this package, including top, w, 
uptime and some low-level system utilities:

    $ rpm -ql procps | grep bin
    /bin/ps
    /sbin/sysctl
    /usr/bin/free
    /usr/bin/pgrep
    /usr/bin/pkill
    /usr/bin/pmap
    /usr/bin/skill
    /usr/bin/slabtop
    /usr/bin/snice
    /usr/bin/tload
    /usr/bin/top
    /usr/bin/uptime
    /usr/bin/vmstat
    /usr/bin/w
    /usr/bin/watch
      

There is a separate coreutils package on Redhat, which is separate from 
this.

What else can I do to help out?

Thanks,
-Luke

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/f9c84cc9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070320/f9c84cc9/attachment-0001.bin>

From admar at luon.net  Tue Mar 20 15:28:55 2007
From: admar at luon.net (Admar Schoonen)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:28:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
	<35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20070320142855.GB27016@pingguo.luon.net>

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:29:54AM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I like it.
> 
> Where is the source ?  On the RHEL5 source CD ISO images or somewhere ?

On my debian box, the source is from http://procps.sourceforge.net/index.html,
which, besides watch, also has ps, top, vmstat, sysctl, w, kill, skill, nice,
snice, pgrep, free, tload, and uptime.

I don't know if all of those programs can be compiled on or ported to solaris
easily, but perhaps that's not necessary.

Regards

Admar


From dnb at ccs.neu.edu  Tue Mar 20 15:43:56 2007
From: dnb at ccs.neu.edu (David Blank-Edelman)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:43:56 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] watch?
In-Reply-To: <45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>
References: <45F70684.8040103@vt.edu> <45FFC1B0.3040400@blastwave.org>
	<45FFDFEC.70102@vt.edu>
	<35975.72.39.216.186.1174397394.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <C0F4F2B3-077F-4D49-8BFD-68048EA90B98@ccs.neu.edu>


On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Luke Scharf wrote:

> BTW, there is a fair bit of stuff in this package, including top,  
> w, uptime and some low-level system utilities:

Just FYI: there are a number of programs that do the same thing that  
aren't nearly as wrapped up in a specific OS (and hence require  
porting). The first time I ever encountered this particular idea was  
with the "display" program posted to comp.unix.sources/mod.sources  
back in the days of yore:

http://groups.google.com/group/mod.sources/browse_thread/thread/ 
1cf184d7e530273e/931bd812fe26dc85?lnk=st&q=display+vixie 
+mod.sources&rnum=2&hl=en#931bd812fe26dc85

Patch to it here:

http://groups.google.com/group/net.sources.bugs/browse_thread/thread/ 
d278ac77d5defd02/eab4dc78a45bdd10?lnk=st&q=display+vixie 
+mod.sources&rnum=1&hl=en#eab4dc78a45bdd10

There's vis: http://examples.oreilly.de/english_examples/upt3/split/ 
vis/vis/

And I know there is at least one Perl implementation (a student of  
mine wrote it), probably several.

         -- dNb

P.S. Speaking about old timey programs to do cool things, have you  
seen iselect? http://www.ossp.org/pkg/tool/iselect/ .


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 20 21:30:16 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About the new GNOME release...
In-Reply-To: <45FFED38.7020301@vt.edu>
Message-ID: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Hello,

It was mentioned that Dennis Clarke and James Lee are
reviewing the next release of GNOME for Blastwave. You
may see an announcement soon from Dennis on the
progression of the project and a possible release date
at soon as Tuesday (maybe, maybe not).

Stay tuned...





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 20 22:22:58 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:22:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About the new GNOME release...
In-Reply-To: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <36469.72.39.216.186.1174425778.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Hello,
>
> It was mentioned that Dennis Clarke and James Lee are
> reviewing the next release of GNOME for Blastwave. You
> may see an announcement soon from Dennis on the
> progression of the project and a possible release date
> at soon as Tuesday (maybe, maybe not).


  I'm doing my last and final here.  I want to push it around for a few days
on x86 and maybe one last complete pkg-get -i gnome test. Thus far it is
really nice and works better than the implementation in Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 5. Seriously, even Wanda the Fish works as expected on Solaris but in
the build from Red Hat .. she barely swims.

  I'll keep you all posted.

Dennis




From andepiel45 at hotmail.com  Wed Mar 21 10:06:31 2007
From: andepiel45 at hotmail.com (Andepiel)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:06:31 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <36469.72.39.216.186.1174425778.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <477775.14274.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<36469.72.39.216.186.1174425778.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <4600F597.9030108@hotmail.com>


  Will be available the KDE 4 too? I think is going to be out for summer.

  Thanks,

C?sar

===================

PD.: Is there any possibility for universities to enable some
repositories with packages for openSolaris? May be this way more repos
will be enabled.


Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It was mentioned that Dennis Clarke and James Lee are
>> reviewing the next release of GNOME for Blastwave. You
>> may see an announcement soon from Dennis on the
>> progression of the project and a possible release date
>> at soon as Tuesday (maybe, maybe not).
> 
> 
>   I'm doing my last and final here.  I want to push it around for a few days
> on x86 and maybe one last complete pkg-get -i gnome test. Thus far it is
> really nice and works better than the implementation in Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux 5. Seriously, even Wanda the Fish works as expected on Solaris but in
> the build from Red Hat .. she barely swims.
> 
>   I'll keep you all posted.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 



		
______________________________________________ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Mar 21 12:55:30 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <4600F597.9030108@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <844905.80196.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Yes, KDE 4.0 is the next Blastwave submission after
the GNOME 2.14/2.16 submission for the current stable
snapshot. I'm still playing with GIMP 2.3.15 which is
over in our /testing area.

I am working off of the current KDE 4.0 (3.80.3)
unstable snapshot which I have ported to the Sun Ultra
40 and Sun Ultra 45. 

The compositor manager works with the Nvidia Quadro
3500 & Nvidia drivers very well. I was able to test
Mesa and Mesademos out as well as my ports of SGI
OpenGL GLUT demos. Basically, all of the 3D effects
you hear about with Compiz, Beryl, Metisse will all
work under KDE and GNOME under Solaris.

I worked on KDE 3.5.6 for Solaris, yet KDE 4.0 is a
major milestone for Blastwave. It is too late to add
KOffice 1.6.2 to the new stable snapshot, but I'll
migrate it after the next stable snapshot is done (I
hope!).

Note: By the way, KDE 4.0 is not officially released
yet and is NOT considered stable (for production use)
yet. Once Dennis finishes his testing of the new GNOME
for Blastwave and we tweak it a little more, I'll
focus fully on KDE 4.0 - once again...

~ Ken Mays




 






--------------------------------------------
Will be available the KDE 4 too? I think is going to
be out for 
summer.

  Thanks,

C?sar

===================

PD.: Is there any possibility for universities to
enable some
repositories with packages for openSolaris? May be
this way more repos
will be enabled.





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 


From tim.smith at degreec.com  Wed Mar 21 13:09:34 2007
From: tim.smith at degreec.com (Tim Smith)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:09:34 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <844905.80196.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <844905.80196.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4601207E.1040209@degreec.com>

Ok, so the million-dollar question ... any chance the slick 3d stuff 
will work for us mere-mortals with lower-end (sunblade1000, expert3d 
class) sparc boxen?  ;-)

Timothy Smith
IT Administrator
Degree Controls, INC



ken mays wrote:
> Yes, KDE 4.0 is the next Blastwave submission after
> the GNOME 2.14/2.16 submission for the current stable
> snapshot. I'm still playing with GIMP 2.3.15 which is
> over in our /testing area.
>
> I am working off of the current KDE 4.0 (3.80.3)
> unstable snapshot which I have ported to the Sun Ultra
> 40 and Sun Ultra 45. 
>
> The compositor manager works with the Nvidia Quadro
> 3500 & Nvidia drivers very well. I was able to test
> Mesa and Mesademos out as well as my ports of SGI
> OpenGL GLUT demos. Basically, all of the 3D effects
> you hear about with Compiz, Beryl, Metisse will all
> work under KDE and GNOME under Solaris.
>
> I worked on KDE 3.5.6 for Solaris, yet KDE 4.0 is a
> major milestone for Blastwave. It is too late to add
> KOffice 1.6.2 to the new stable snapshot, but I'll
> migrate it after the next stable snapshot is done (I
> hope!).
>
> Note: By the way, KDE 4.0 is not officially released
> yet and is NOT considered stable (for production use)
> yet. Once Dennis finishes his testing of the new GNOME
> for Blastwave and we tweak it a little more, I'll
> focus fully on KDE 4.0 - once again...
>
> ~ Ken Mays
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Will be available the KDE 4 too? I think is going to
> be out for 
> summer.
>
>   Thanks,
>
> C?sar
>
> ===================
>
> PD.: Is there any possibility for universities to
> enable some
> repositories with packages for openSolaris? May be
> this way more repos
> will be enabled.
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Mar 21 15:53:26 2007
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] About KDE
In-Reply-To: <4601207E.1040209@degreec.com>
Message-ID: <640987.47707.qm@web33601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

The minimum SPARC requirements is at least a Sun Blade
100 compatible platform (with >=256MB RAM) and Sun's
OpenGL 1.5. 

But as they say, you get what you pay for... ;o>

~ Ken


----------------------------
Ok, so the million-dollar question ... any chance the
slick 3d stuff 
will work for us mere-mortals with lower-end
(sunblade1000, expert3d 
class) sparc boxen?  ;-)

Timothy Smith
IT Administrator
Degree Controls, INC



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097


From william at wbonnet.net  Thu Mar 22 09:00:42 2007
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:00:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 2.0.0.3 is available
Message-ID: <460237AA.7050908@wbonnet.net>

Hi

The latest version of Firefox is available from testing for both sparc 
and x86. Please let me know if you have any problem with these packages. 
If no problem is reported.

Kind regards,

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Thu Mar 22 16:31:47 2007
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:31:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
Message-ID: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com>

No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:

# (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
        software                    localrev                   remoterev
       wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946

Anyone else seeing this?

/MOL


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Mar 26 14:06:52 2007
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:06:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>

On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> 
> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> 
> Anyone else seeing this?

Nobody?


From andepiel45 at hotmail.com  Mon Mar 26 14:18:28 2007
From: andepiel45 at hotmail.com (Andepiel)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:18:28 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Nexenta
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4607BA14.8000107@hotmail.com>



  Look at this project:

http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Nexenta_OS

   Pretty nice, don't you think?

C?sar


		
______________________________________________ 
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
Llamadas a fijos y m?viles desde 1 c?ntimo por minuto. 
http://es.voice.yahoo.com


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Mon Mar 26 14:51:52 2007
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:51:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4607C1E8.3030407@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Mats Larsson wrote:
> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
>> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
>> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
>>
>> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
>>
>> Anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Nobody?


# (From site http://blastwave.berlios.de/csw//unstable )
        software                    localrev                   remoterev
       wireshark             [Not installed]            0.99.5,rev=20946


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Mar 26 15:09:30 2007
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:09:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607C1E8.3030407@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<4607C1E8.3030407@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <4607C60A.3080807@ericsson.com>

On 2007-03-26 14:51, G?rard Henry wrote:
> Mats Larsson wrote:
>> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
>>> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
>>> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
>>>
>>> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>>>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>>>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
>>>
>>> Anyone else seeing this?
>> Nobody?
> 
> 
> # (From site http://blastwave.berlios.de/csw//unstable )
>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>        wireshark             [Not installed]            0.99.5,rev=20946

And if you install it?


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 15:18:13 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:18:13 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 26/03/07, 13:06:52, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote 
regarding Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:

> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> > No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get
> > the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> >
> > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> >
> > Anyone else seeing this?

> Nobody?

Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
out exactly where or why.



James.


From anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com  Mon Mar 26 16:03:31 2007
From: anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com (Anthony Cogan)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:03:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
Message-ID: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>

Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav packages?

I'm getting the following errors in my nightly logwatch report....

    Received signal: wake up: 4 Time(s)
    nonblock_connect: connect timing out (30 secs): 7 Time(s)
    WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!: 49 Time(s)
    WARNING: Current functionality level = 10, recommended = 14: 16  
Time(s)
    DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/faq.html: 49 Time(s)
    WARNING: Current functionality level = 10, recommended = 13: 9  
Time(s)
    connect_error: getsockopt(SO_ERROR): fd=6 error=145: Connection  
timed out: 1 Time(s)
    WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended version: 0.90.1: 16  
Time(s)
    WARNING: Local version: 0.88.7 Recommended version: 0.90: 8 Time(s)
    freshclam daemon 0.88.7 (OS: solaris2.8, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386):  
2 Time(s)


From shuttlebox at gmail.com  Mon Mar 26 16:13:02 2007
From: shuttlebox at gmail.com (shuttlebox)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:13:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/26/07, James Lee <james at blastwave.org> wrote:
> On 26/03/07, 13:06:52, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote
> regarding Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:
>
> > On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> > > No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get
> > > the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> > >
> > > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> > >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> > >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > >
> > > Anyone else seeing this?
>
> > Nobody?
>
> Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
> out exactly where or why.

I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
vote for the latter.

-- 
/peter


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 16:26:45 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:26:45 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
	<625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070326.14264500.1227556374@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 26/03/07, 15:13:02, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote regarding 
Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:

> > > > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> > > >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> > > >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > > Nobody?
> >
> > Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
> > out exactly where or why.

> I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
> to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
> vote for the latter.

> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 16:31:47 2007
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:31:47 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<20070326.13181300.3539186785@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>
	<625385e30703260713n1f6ce736hcdb0732ef1d87d80@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070326.14314700.537859295@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk>

On 26/03/07, 15:13:02, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote regarding
Re: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem:

> > > > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> > > >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> > > >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > > Nobody?
> >
> > Yes, it's an error. I think with pkg-get but haven't had time to find
> > out exactly where or why.

> I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
> to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
> vote for the latter.

The way it used to work it didn't matter if REV was even REV, it
just stripped the leading part that matched then took the longer
if one was null.  It's possible Phil has changed this.

Is used to be so:
    0.99.5 < 0.99.5.sackofpotatoes
things only get confusing when comparing:
    0.99.5.sackofpotatoes to 0.99.5.basketoffruit.




James.


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 17:18:49 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:18:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <37790.72.39.216.186.1174922329.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
>> No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get
>> the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
>>
>> # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>>         software                    localrev                   remoterev
>>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
>>
>> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Nobody?

# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -d wireshark
Trying
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/sparc/5.8/wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
--11:17:04-- 
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable/sparc/5.8/wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
           => `wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'
Resolving ftp.math.purdue.edu... 128.210.3.14
Connecting to ftp.math.purdue.edu|128.210.3.14|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 16,183,570 (15M) [text/plain]

    0K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 19%  543.50 KB/s
 3072K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 38%  499.42 KB/s
 6144K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 58%  552.74 KB/s
 9216K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 77%  540.73 KB/s
12288K ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 97%  570.26 KB/s
15360K ......                                               100%  562.38 KB/s

11:17:33 (540.88 KB/s) -
`wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' saved
[16183570/16183570]

downloaded wireshark-0.99.5,rev=20946-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
#


Looks like a bad datestamp that leads to sligt confusion.

Just pkgrm the wwireshark package and then pkg-get -install it again.

Dennis



From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 18:03:51 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] Nexenta
In-Reply-To: <4607BA14.8000107@hotmail.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
	<4607BA14.8000107@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <37817.72.39.216.186.1174925031.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


>
>
>   Look at this project:
>
> http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Nexenta_OS
>
>    Pretty nice, don't you think?

  go look at the sponsors page there :

      http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/Sponsors

  see  blastwave.org ?



Dennis



From a.cervellin at virgilio.it  Mon Mar 26 18:07:10 2007
From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:07:10 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
Message-ID: <1118f003fa3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>

> I guess we could change pkg-get to be case insensitive when it comes
> to package names or enforce uppercase REV when accepting packages. I
> vote for the latter.

"REV" has a different meaning than "rev", the 
pkg name syntax is:

xxxx-#.#.#,REV=YYYY.MM.DD_rev=abcde-xxxxxxx
(see 
http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html)

the bug is that pkg-get 
doesn not handle the "rev" suffix when it's not together with the "REV" 
too.


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Mon Mar 26 18:19:09 2007
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
In-Reply-To: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
References: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
Message-ID: <37869.72.39.216.186.1174925949.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav packages?

  DON'T PANIC!

10244341  Mar 11 09:00 clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
10303658  Mar 11 09:01 clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

so yeah .. and they are being tested.

Dennis



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Tue Mar 27 00:07:21 2007
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:07:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
In-Reply-To: <37869.72.39.216.186.1174925949.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
	<37869.72.39.216.186.1174925949.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20070326170721.00000444@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT)
"Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org> wrote:

> 
> > Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav
> > packages?
> 
>   DON'T PANIC!
> 
> 10244341  Mar 11 09:00
> clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz 10303658  Mar
> 11 09:01 clamav-0.90.1,REV=2007.03.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> so yeah .. and they are being tested.

The latest on this is that I need to build a version that I can debug.
Besides configuration issues, ScanArchive enabled does not work with
this package.  I am trying to work on this; but time is not on my side
with my new responsibilities at my regular job.  I hope to have an
answer soon.

Alex

-- 


From casterln at nature.Berkeley.EDU  Tue Mar 27 00:11:48 2007
From: casterln at nature.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Casterline)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:11:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
In-Reply-To: <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
References: <4602A163.1040203@ericsson.com> <4607B75C.8000807@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20070326221147.GC20273@nature.Berkeley.EDU>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:06:52PM +0200, Mats Larsson wrote:
> On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> > No matter how many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
> > the following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> > 
> > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
> >         software                    localrev                   remoterev
> >        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,rev=20946
> > 
> > Anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Nobody?

Me too. 


From scott-blastwave at riskboys.com  Wed Mar 28 22:12:19 2007
From: scott-blastwave at riskboys.com (Scott White)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:12:19 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg-get v2 makecontents file
Message-ID: <55038.87.74.24.183.1175112739.squirrel@87.74.24.183>


Rgds

Scott


Does anyone have a new makecontents script for creating pkg-get
repositories?  The one at http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/makecontents is
for version 1 and doesn't create the descriptions file.

Rgds

Scott





From a.cervellin at virgilio.it  Thu Mar 29 12:19:06 2007
From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:19:06 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Subject: [csw-users] wireshark pkg problem
Message-ID: <1119d34ab0e.a.cervellin@virgilio.it>

It should be fixed now, try again please.


----Messaggio originale----
Da: mats.larsson at ericsson.com
Data: 26-mar-2007 14.06
A: "questions and 
discussions"<users at lists.blastwave.org>
Ogg: Re: [csw-users] wireshark 
pkg problem

On 2007-03-22 16:31, Mats Larsson wrote:
> No matter how 
many times i do a 'pkg-get -u' on wireshark I still get 
> the 
following when I do a 'pkg-get -c' on it:
> 
> # (From site http:
//ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
>         
software                    localrev                   remoterev
>        wireshark                      0.99.5            0.99.5,
rev=20946
> 
> Anyone else seeing this?

Nobody?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.
org/mailman/listinfo/users





From roman.klesel at googlemail.com  Thu Mar 29 12:48:13 2007
From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:48:13 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] cswexim unstable: Upgrade trouble
Message-ID: <1d96939c0703290348i3e65b6adm19811cd6dc37a0ce@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

yesterday I did the following on one of our machines:

pkg-get -U
pkg-get upgrade

When replacing the exim package a quite nasty thing happened:

The exim executable /opt/csw/sbin/exim was replaced with a shell
script, that did something like:

/usr/lib/sendmail -bt

Unfortunately /usr/lib/sendmail is a sysmlink to /opt/csw/sbin/exim

No need to tell what happened when the installer tried to start the
exim deamon... :-(

Anyone else experianced the same problem? Or is it just here?

(solaris 9 sparc)

Greetings Roman


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Thu Mar 29 12:56:57 2007
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:56:57 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] clamav updates...
In-Reply-To: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
References: <17553900-4834-4604-A0A0-12DEBB377151@thinkunix.com>
Message-ID: <20070329055657.00006555@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:03:31 -0500
Anthony Cogan <anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know if there are any plans on updating the Clamav
> packages?
> 

I put an update for clamav libclamav at http://www.blastwave.org/testing

There is a new dependency on CSWgcc3corert.

ScanArchive enabled appears to work properly.

If you like, please download and manually install the update.

Thanks,

Alex


From zizban at adelphia.net  Sat Mar 31 02:09:44 2007
From: zizban at adelphia.net (Chris Turkel)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:09:44 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Fluxbox-1.0-rc.3
Message-ID: <B9B585A3-C7FB-46CA-9DEF-DFEA32225243@adelphia.net>

Hi all

Is there a dtlogin package for the new Fluxbox?