From SELundgr at uncc.edu Tue Apr 1 23:38:45 2008 From: SELundgr at uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:38:45 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap Message-ID: I installed the nmap package today: pkg-get -i nmap after a : pkg-get -u the dependencies were satfisfied then: selundgr at test-server $ nmap adtest.uncc.edu ld.so.1: nmap: fatal: libssl.so.0.9.8: open failed: No such file or directory Killed My bet is that I'm missing a symlink. Any guesses where it should go? Openssl package and libssl information follows: root at ics20 # pkginfo CSWossl application CSWossl openssl - Openssl meta package root at ics20 # pkginfo -l CSWossl PKGINST: CSWossl NAME: openssl - Openssl meta package CATEGORY: application ARCH: i386 VERSION: 0.9.8,REV=2007.12.26_rev=g VENDOR: http://www.openssl.org/source/ packaged for CSW by Yann Rouillard PSTAMP: yann at isis-20071226075042 INSTDATE: Apr 01 2008 13:30 HOTLINE: http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ EMAIL: yann at blastwave.org STATUS: completely installed FILES: 2 installed pathnames 1 directories 4 blocks used (approx) root at ics20 # find / -name libssl.* /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libssl.a /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.a /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.old /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.a /opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20070111110502.21757 Scott Lundgren selundgr at uncc.edu University of North Carolina at Charlotte ITS - Web Services www.uncc.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080401/a4d3e686/attachment-0001.html From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 00:21:51 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:21:51 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Lundgren, Scott wrote: > My bet is that I'm missing a symlink. Any guesses where it should go? > Openssl package and libssl information follows: I've seen this before, the lib is copied but the symlinks are not created. Maybe there's something wrong with a pre/post-script since the package file list shows libssl.so.0.9.8. There's some preservation of old libs going on and maybe there's a problem there. Try: # cd /opt/csw/lib # ln -s libssl.so libssl.so.0.9.8 -- /peter From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 01:06:30 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:06:30 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> Hello Scott First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended the use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile or another start script. Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with the command below: ldd /nmap In my sample (below), I put the shared libraries of nmap in linux [root at cerberos ~]# which nmap /usr/bin/nmap [root at cerberos ~]# ldd /usr/bin/nmap linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00730000) libpcre.so.0 => /lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x040df000) libssl.so.6 => /lib/libssl.so.6 (0x035a3000) libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x033d9000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00c82000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00976000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00c29000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00834000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00777000) libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x0350e000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00745000) libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x0074a000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x007ee000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0099f000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x009be000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00817000) libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x007a7000) libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00772000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x006cf000) libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x006e8000) In these links, check if you don't have any with "not found", in this case, your system not recognize the path to lib (probably in /opt/csw/...) Third, you can check for dependence package in your system. Good luck and Waiting your answer ... Best Regards Waldirio 2008/4/1, Peter Bonivart : > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Lundgren, Scott > wrote: > > My bet is that I'm missing a symlink. Any guesses where it should go? > > Openssl package and libssl information follows: > > > I've seen this before, the lib is copied but the symlinks are not > created. Maybe there's something wrong with a pre/post-script since > the package file list shows libssl.so.0.9.8. There's some preservation > of old libs going on and maybe there's a problem there. > > Try: > > # cd /opt/csw/lib > # ln -s libssl.so libssl.so.0.9.8 > > > -- > /peter > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080401/05c58492/attachment.html From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 01:15:36 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:15:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hello Scott > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended the > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile or > another start script. > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with the > command below: > > ldd /nmap > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is what I see : . . . Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner as ## Installing part 1 of 1. /opt/csw/bin/nmap /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe /opt/csw/bin/xnmap /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl [ verifying class ] Installation of was successful. # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 That looks perfect to me. What libs are you missing ? Dennis From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 01:24:31 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:24:31 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804011624k1b75f849m8d68343048f6d9ac@mail.gmail.com> Hello all Thanks Dennis, that's it # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8=> /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 Now, just check what library is missing in your system. []'s Waldirio 2008/4/1, Dennis Clarke : > > > > Hello Scott > > > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended > the > > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile > or > > another start script. > > > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with > the > > command below: > > > > ldd /nmap > > > > > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is what > I > see : > > . > . > . > Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner as > > > ## Installing part 1 of 1. > /opt/csw/bin/nmap > /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe > /opt/csw/bin/xnmap > /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl > [ verifying class ] > > Installation of was successful. > > # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8=> /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > > That looks perfect to me. > > What libs are you missing ? > > > Dennis > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080401/525811a0/attachment.html From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 10:03:40 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:03:40 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 Message-ID: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From SELundgr at uncc.edu Wed Apr 2 15:56:48 2008 From: SELundgr at uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:56:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com><7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run this for me so I get the symlinks correct? cd /opt/csw/lib ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 Scott Lundgren selundgr at uncc.edu University of North Carolina at Charlotte ITS - Web Services www.uncc.edu -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+selundgr=uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr=uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Clarke Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:16 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] unhappy nmap > Hello Scott > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended the > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile or > another start script. > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with the > command below: > > ldd /nmap > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is what I see : . . . Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner as ## Installing part 1 of 1. /opt/csw/bin/nmap /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe /opt/csw/bin/xnmap /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl [ verifying class ] Installation of was successful. # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 That looks perfect to me. What libs are you missing ? Dennis _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 16:14:55 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:14:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott wrote: > Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run > this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > > cd /opt/csw/lib > ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 # ls -ld libssl.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> libssl.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.0.9.7 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 # ls -ld libcrypto.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is that the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) openssl_rt. -- /peter From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 16:21:09 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:21:09 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804020721q31befbe3kcc65e608d490ada3@mail.gmail.com> Hey Scott You can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH with the command [root at cerberos ~]# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH If you have return, e.g. /usr/lib, you can unset (command below) and try again [root at cerberos ~]# unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH or [root at cerberos ~]# LD_LIBRARY_PATH="";export LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if the problem persist, (this work, but i don't recommend ... is not beauty) is create the symbolic link ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 /lib ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 /lib Good luck. Waldirio 2008/4/2, Lundgren, Scott : > > Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run > this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > > cd cccc > ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > > libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > > /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > > Scott Lundgren > selundgr at uncc.edu > University of North Carolina at Charlotte > ITS - Web Services > www.uncc.edu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces+selundgr=uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org > [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr = > uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf > Of Dennis Clarke > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:16 PM > To: questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] unhappy nmap > > > > Hello Scott > > > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended > the > > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile > or > > another start script. > > > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with > the > > command below: > > > > ldd /nmap > > > > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is > what I > see : > > . > . > . > Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner > as > > > ## Installing part 1 of 1. > /opt/csw/bin/nmap > /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe > /opt/csw/bin/xnmap > /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl > [ verifying class ] > > Installation of was successful. > > # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => > /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => > /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > > That looks perfect to me. > > What libs are you missing ? > > Dennis > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080402/c9afd82f/attachment.html From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 17:05:08 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:05:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 In-Reply-To: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that > should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have > done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with > lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > The first thought that crosses my mind .. is how to best test it. Also, what rev of Solaris to test with. Dennis From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 17:09:32 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott wrote: >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct? >> >> cd /opt/csw/lib >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 >> >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) >> >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 >> >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 >> >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 >> >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > # ls -ld libssl.so* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> > libssl.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.0.9.7 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > # ls -ld libcrypto.so* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so -> > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is that > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. > > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) openssl_rt. > I'm trying to figure out how he broke it. - Dennis Clarke From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 17:45:59 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:45:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 In-Reply-To: <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <625385e30804020845i34fd05cdl619f9036da326e5b@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that > > should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have > > done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with > > lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > > > The first thought that crosses my mind .. is how to best test it. > Also, what rev of Solaris to test with. I would like feedback on anything from installation to how Perl scripts/apps work with it. I run it on a test system with Solaris 9 Sparc and in production on a Solaris 10 i386 system. The production system is very Perl intense with several apps/scripts that are constantly used but I share your concern how to fully test something like Perl. :-) If someone posted that they successfully installed the package on Solaris X arch Y and that "perl -V" worked would help to confirm that it's at least properly packaged. All efforts to help are most welcome no matter how basic or thorough they are, I would like to release these packages to unstable as soon as the stable freeze is over, I really need the IO update myself for MailScanner. -- /peter From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 18:30:19 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:30:19 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 In-Reply-To: <625385e30804020845i34fd05cdl619f9036da326e5b@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <625385e30804020845i34fd05cdl619f9036da326e5b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3019.72.39.133.97.1207153819.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> >> > I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that >> > should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have >> > done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with >> > lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. >> > >> > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> > >> >> The first thought that crosses my mind .. is how to best test it. >> Also, what rev of Solaris to test with. > > I would like feedback on anything from installation to how Perl > scripts/apps work with it. I run it on a test system with Solaris 9 > Sparc and in production on a Solaris 10 i386 system. The production > system is very Perl intense with several apps/scripts that are > constantly used but I share your concern how to fully test something > like Perl. :-) > > If someone posted that they successfully installed the package on > Solaris X arch Y and that "perl -V" worked would help to confirm that > it's at least properly packaged. All efforts to help are most welcome > no matter how basic or thorough they are, I would like to release > these packages to unstable as soon as the stable freeze is over, I > really need the IO update myself for MailScanner. Well, as you may have read in various lists, I have a few very old lowest common denominator machines here. One is a dual Pentium II machine with 768MB of memory and three SCSI controllers, dual IDE DVD burners, externally attached SCSI disks and a 8mm EXABYTE tape drive. If your perl software works there then we can say that it has been seen working on Solaris 8 x86. If it does not work there then we don't really know anything. The same is true with a Sun SparcStation 20 here. ========================================================================== Test (1) - Solaris 8 x86 # uname -a SunOS titan 5.8 Generic_117351-53 i86pc i386 i86pc # cat /etc/release Solaris 8 2/02 s28x_u7wos_08a INTEL Copyright 2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Assembled 18 December 2001 # pkgadd -d ./perl-5.8.8\,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg The following packages are available: 1 CSWperl perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (i386) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: Processing package instance from perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (i386) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 1, February 1989 . . . [ verifying class ] /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/psed /opt/csw/bin/pstruct /opt/csw/share/man/man1/c2ph.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/s2p.1 Installation of was successful. # # file /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/perl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped # ldd /opt/csw/bin/perl libperl.so.5.8.8 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libperl.so.5.8.8 libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libdb-4.4.so => /opt/csw/bdb44/lib/libdb-4.4.so libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libm.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 # # /opt/csw/bin/perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: Platform: osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=i86pc-solaris-thread-multi uname='sunos thor 5.8 generic_117351-51 i86pc i386 i86pc' config_args='' hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define usemultiplicity=define useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=generic -xarch=generic -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64', optimize='-xO3 -xtarget=generic -xarch=generic', cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=generic -xarch=generic -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include' ccversion='Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-07 2007/10/03', gccversion='', gccosandvers='' intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=1234 d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=12 ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8 alignbytes=4, prototype=define Linker and Libraries: ld='cc', ldflags ='-L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' libpth=/usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib /lib /opt/csw/lib libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8 gnulibc_version='' Dynamic Linking: dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-R /opt/csw/lib' cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API USE_SITECUSTOMIZE Built under solaris Compiled at Mar 25 2008 09:26:28 @INC: /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/lib/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw . # ======================================================================== Test (2) - Solaris 8 Sparc # uname -a SunOS fossil 5.8 Generic_117350-51 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20 # cat /etc/release Solaris 8 2/04 s28s_hw4wos_05a SPARC Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Assembled 08 January 2004 # # pkgadd -d ./perl-5.8.8\,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg The following packages are available: 1 CSWperl perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (sparc) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: Processing package instance from perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (sparc) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 1, February 1989 Copyright (C) 1989 Free Software Foundation, Inc. . . . [ verifying class ] /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/psed /opt/csw/bin/pstruct /opt/csw/share/man/man1/c2ph.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/s2p.1 Installation of was successful. # # file /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/perl: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped # ldd /opt/csw/bin/perl libperl.so.5.8.8 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libperl.so.5.8.8 libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libdb-4.4.so => /opt/csw/bdb44/lib/libdb-4.4.so libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libm.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 # # /opt/csw/bin/perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: Platform: osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=sun4-solaris-thread-multi uname='sunos ra 5.8 generic_117350-51 sun4u sparc sunw,sun-blade-1000' config_args='' hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define usemultiplicity=define useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64', optimize='-xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8', cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include' ccversion='Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-06 2007/10/03', gccversion='', gccosandvers='' intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=4321 d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=16 ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8 alignbytes=8, prototype=define Linker and Libraries: ld='cc', ldflags ='-L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/v8plus -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' libpth=/usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/v8plus /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib /lib /opt/csw/lib libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8 gnulibc_version='' Dynamic Linking: dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-R /opt/csw/lib' cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/v8plus -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API USE_SITECUSTOMIZE Built under solaris Compiled at Mar 25 2008 11:07:21 @INC: /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/lib/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw . # ====================================================================== Looks good. Dennis From dam at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 19:29:12 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:29:12 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] zsh 4.3.6 in testing Message-ID: Hi, finally all the failing zsh-tests have been fixed upstream and there is now a superclean zsh 4.3.6 in testing/: zsh-4.3.6,REV=2008.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz zsh-4.3.6,REV=2008.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Feedback as always welcome! -- Dago From selundgr at uncc.edu Fri Apr 4 21:03:29 2008 From: selundgr at uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:03:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com><7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com><4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: I'm afraid I can't shed light in how I broke it as I belive it was just the sequnce of packages that were being upgraded during the 'pkg- get -a' that removed a symlink that was needed & didn't put it back. If there are logs that I can provide to help let me know but my problem is solved thank you blastwave community! - SL On April 2, 2008, at 10:09 AM, "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott > wrote: > >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can > someone run > >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > >> > >> cd /opt/csw/lib > >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > >> > >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> > >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > >> > >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > >> > >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > >> > >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > > > # ls -ld libssl.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> > > libssl.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 > > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so. > 0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so. > 0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > # ls -ld libcrypto.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so > -> > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so. > 0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so. > 0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > > > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is > > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is > that > > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be > > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. > > > > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) > openssl_rt. > > > > I'm trying to figure out how he broke it. > > - > Dennis Clarke > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080404/c745e74d/attachment-0001.html From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Apr 4 21:45:03 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:45:03 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core In-Reply-To: <479F5615.4070403@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca> <479F5615.4070403@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <47F6853F.3030508@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Oscar del Rio a ?crit : >> # ls -ld X11 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 34 Jan 29 11:12 X11 >> -> root/usr/openwin/share/include/X11 >> ^^^^ known bug: http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0002810 From waldirio at gmail.com Sat Apr 5 01:25:57 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:25:57 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804041625y7b511f51k6cb382f031f749d2@mail.gmail.com> Hello Scott Nice ..., any problem ... write here .. ;) Best Regards Waldirio 2008/4/4, Scott Lundgren : > > > > I'm afraid I can't shed light in how I broke it as I belive it was just > the sequnce of packages that were being upgraded during the 'pkg-get -a' > that removed a symlink that was needed & didn't put it back. > > > If there are logs that I can provide to help let me know but my problem > is solved thank you blastwave community! > > > - SL > > On April 2, 2008, at 10:09 AM, "Dennis Clarke" > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott > wrote: > >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run > >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > >> > >> cd /opt/csw/lib > >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > >> > >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> > >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > >> > >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > >> > >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > >> > >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > > > # ls -ld libssl.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> > > libssl.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 > > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > # ls -ld libcrypto.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so -> > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > > > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is > > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is that > > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be > > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. > > > > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) > openssl_rt. > > > > I'm trying to figure out how he broke it. > > - > Dennis Clarke > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080404/564f756a/attachment.html From william at wbonnet.net Sun Apr 6 17:18:19 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:18:19 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Eclipse 3.3.2 is available Message-ID: <47F8E9BB.4060508@wbonnet.net> Hi I'm pleased to let you know that Eclipse Europa 3.3.2 is now available for download on both SPARC and x86 platform. Eclipse package has been split in two : . EclipseCmn, which contains the architecture independant files (like html, some jars, etc.) . Eclipse, which contains the architecture dependant file (like eclipse executable, gtk bindings, etc.) Thus you have to install eclipsecmn, then eclipse package. Dependancy on swtlib has been removed since eclipse is build with embedded gtk support and libs. Packages are available from testing : http://www.blastwave.org/testing Direct access url are : Eclipse Common : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipsecmn-3.3.2,REV=2008.03.30-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz Eclipse i386 : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.3.2,REV=2008.03.30-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Eclipse SPARC : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.3.2,REV=2008.03.30-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Please let me know if you have any problem using it. Cheers, -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Wed Apr 9 00:04:08 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:04:08 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Tomcat 4, 5 and 6 are available Message-ID: <47FBEBD8.202@wbonnet.net> Hi Packages for tomcat 4, 5 and 6 have been released to testing. Please report me any problem. Tomcat 4 is upgraded to 4.1.37 Tomcat 5 is upgraded to 5.5.26 Tomcat 6 is upgraded to 6.0.16 The packages support SMF. cheers -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From zizban at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 02:10:42 2008 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:10:42 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Mplayer Question Message-ID: I am using Mplayer on Solaris x86. My sound card works fine with Solaris but I get no sound using Mplayer. What sound output do I use? I tried a few already without any luck. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080408/7c6596cf/attachment.html From jwheeler at blastwave.org Wed Apr 9 14:08:07 2008 From: jwheeler at blastwave.org (Jonathan Wheeler) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:08:07 +1200 Subject: [csw-users] Mplayer Question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47FCB1A7.8070107@blastwave.org> Chris Turkel wrote: > I am using Mplayer on Solaris x86. My sound card works fine with Solaris > but I get no sound using Mplayer. What sound output do I use? I tried a > few already without any luck. Hi Chris, The plain "sun" driver worked for me, and I used this initially for some months. Later I installed decided to check out OSS, and that what I'm still using today. To be honest I have no idea what "sun" is, or how it works, but it worked for me out of the box. If that's not working for you, I can at least confirm that OSS also works under solaris/mplayer. Jonathan From zizban at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 14:34:56 2008 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:34:56 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Mplayer Question In-Reply-To: <47FCB1A7.8070107@blastwave.org> References: <47FCB1A7.8070107@blastwave.org> Message-ID: Right after I sent the email, I figured it out. I never thought to try to the sun driver on x86. I dunno why. Works fine now. On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Jonathan Wheeler wrote: > Chris Turkel wrote: > > I am using Mplayer on Solaris x86. My sound card works fine with Solaris > > but I get no sound using Mplayer. What sound output do I use? I tried a > > few already without any luck. > > Hi Chris, > > The plain "sun" driver worked for me, and I used this initially for some > months. Later I installed decided to check out OSS, and that what I'm > still using today. > > To be honest I have no idea what "sun" is, or how it works, but it > worked for me out of the box. If that's not working for you, I can at > least confirm that OSS also works under solaris/mplayer. > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080409/eefe87a5/attachment-0001.html From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Apr 9 21:27:10 2008 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:27:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request Message-ID: Hello - I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! -Jon ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080409/a8e4ac21/attachment.html From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 9 21:49:36 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:49:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Fechner, Jon L. wrote: > Hello ? > > > > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released from > http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant bug > fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? > > > > Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! A new stable release is under way as we speak so it will not be in that one but it should be possible to release it to unstable as soon as stable is done. We also need a new maintainer for it. Would you be interested? -- /peter From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Apr 9 22:19:50 2008 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:19:50 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Peter Bonivart Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:50 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Fechner, Jon L. wrote: > Hello - > > > > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released from > http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant bug > fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? > > > > Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! A new stable release is under way as we speak so it will not be in that one but it should be possible to release it to unstable as soon as stable is done. We also need a new maintainer for it. Would you be interested? -- /peter _______________________________________________ [Fechner, Jon L.] Sorry Peter, I am just the installer, I don't use the tool. -Jon ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ From shuttlebox at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 16:12:03 2008 From: shuttlebox at gmail.com (shuttlebox) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:12:03 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e30804100712o5a4be5a4r4eb62594e11e3756@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Fechner, Jon L. wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org > [mailto:users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Bonivart > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:50 PM > To: questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Fechner, Jon L. > wrote: > > Hello - > > > > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released > from > > http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant > bug > > fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? > > > > Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! > > A new stable release is under way as we speak so it will not be in > that one but it should be possible to release it to unstable as soon > as stable is done. We also need a new maintainer for it. Would you be > interested? > > [Fechner, Jon L.] > Sorry Peter, I am just the installer, I don't use the tool. I gave it a shot even though I know nothing about it. You can download from testing if you want to try it: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/cscope-15.6,REV=2008.04.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/cscope-15.6,REV=2008.04.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Post problems here, also let us know if it's OK so it can be released to unstable. -- /peter From dam at blastwave.org Thu Apr 10 16:31:40 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:31:40 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> Hi Jon, Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was > released from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and > provides significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in > the next stable release? > If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I packaged some time ago in testing: There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. Best regards -- Dago From karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com Thu Apr 10 21:30:13 2008 From: karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com (Thiele, Karl D (Karl)) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:30:13 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> References: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Folks, If you use this with C++ there is a bug, I fixed it about 1 year ago, very simple fix and documented at scope site. Does not parse fully qualified members in function calls. It did not recognise "::" believe fix in fscanner.l I believe it is : (been a while and I do not have the time at the moment to make a diff....) the "::" { {ws}*\(({wsnl}|{identifier}|{number}|"::"|[*&[\]=,.])*\)([()]|{wsnl})*[: a-zA-Z_#{] { -karl -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave. org] On Behalf Of Dagobert Michelsen Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:32 AM To: questions and discussions; Fechner, Jon L. Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request Hi Jon, Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released > from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides > significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next > stable release? > If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I packaged some time ago in testing: There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dam at blastwave.org Fri Apr 11 09:16:44 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:16:44 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> References: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Message-ID: Hi Karl, Am 10.04.2008 um 21:30 schrieb Thiele, Karl D (Karl): >> Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: >>> I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was >>> released >>> from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides >>> significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next >>> stable release? >> >> If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I >> packaged some time ago in testing: >> > SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz> >> There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. >> > > If you use this with C++ there is a bug, I fixed it about 1 year ago, > very simple fix and > documented at scope site. Does not parse fully qualified members in > function calls. > It did not recognise "::" believe fix in fscanner.l > > I believe it is : (been a while and I do not have the time at the > moment to make a diff....) the "::" > > { > {ws}*\(({wsnl}|{identifier}|{number}|"::"|[*&[\]=,.])*\)([()]| > {wsnl})*[: > a-zA-Z_#{] { Are you referring to cscope or OpenGrok here? Do you have a link to the bug report? Best regards -- Dago From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Apr 11 13:25:29 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:25:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] rapidsvn doesn't work on SXDE 1/08? Message-ID: <47FF4AA9.3020701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i installed rapidsvn on sxde 1/08 (x86). When using it on remote machine (sunray solaris 10), it works. When trying to use it directly on sxde, i got this error: yakari-henry% rapidsvn Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": ld.so.1: rapidsvn: fatal: libgnomebreakpad.so: open failed: No such file or directory The program 'rapidsvn' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'. (Details: serial 299 error_code 11 request_code 147 minor_code 5) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) looking at process rapidsvn with pldd when it works on remote login, i see no libgnomebreakpad.so: yakari-henry% pldd 8184 | grep gnome /opt/csw/lib/libgnomeprint-2-2.so.0.1.0 /opt/csw/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.so.0.1.0 /opt/csw/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.1400.0 In two cases, the same binary is launched on the same machine, it is only DISPLAY that's different. Anyone has got the same problem? thanks for help, gerard From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Apr 11 14:46:32 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:46:32 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] meld doesn't work on solaris 10? Message-ID: <47FF5DA8.4020001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i've installed meld on SXDE 1/08, and it works well. On S10, it doesn't: w2100-henry% meld Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/meld", line 81, in import meldapp File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/meldapp.py", line 27, in import prefs File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/prefs.py", line 52, in import gconf ImportError: No module named gconf Looking at what happens on sxde, i see that: yakari-root% pldd 11175|grep conf /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gconf.so /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.2 so it seems that in sxde, it depends on OS ressource (SUNWgnome-python-libs), and that ressource doesn't exist on solaris 10 Any idea, gerard From karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com Fri Apr 11 16:35:45 2008 From: karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com (Thiele, Karl D (Karl)) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:35:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Message-ID: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609DB7E43@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Hi Dago, I forwarded you email on the fix, cscope is realy for "C" not C++, but it will work with C++ and Java. I use "source navigator" more than cscope. -kalr -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave. org] On Behalf Of Dagobert Michelsen Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 3:17 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request Hi Karl, Am 10.04.2008 um 21:30 schrieb Thiele, Karl D (Karl): >> Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: >>> I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was >>> released from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and >>> provides significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in >>> the next stable release? >> >> If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I >> packaged some time ago in testing: >> > SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz> >> There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. >> > > If you use this with C++ there is a bug, I fixed it about 1 year ago, > very simple fix and documented at scope site. Does not parse fully > qualified members in function calls. > It did not recognise "::" believe fix in fscanner.l > > I believe it is : (been a while and I do not have the time at the > moment to make a diff....) the "::" > > { > {ws}*\(({wsnl}|{identifier}|{number}|"::"|[*&[\]=,.])*\)([()]| > {wsnl})*[: > a-zA-Z_#{] { Are you referring to cscope or OpenGrok here? Do you have a link to the bug report? Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From a.cervellin at acm.org Sat Apr 12 14:53:23 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:53:23 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing evince 2.22.1 Message-ID: <4800B0C3.9040809@acm.org> evince 2.22.1 is available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing it requires poppler 0.8.0, always on http://www.blastwave.org/testing From william at wbonnet.net Sat Apr 12 23:15:49 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:15:49 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing JBoss 4.2.2.GA is available Message-ID: <48012685.3020009@wbonnet.net> Hi *JBoss package has been updated to latest community stable version. Thank you for your feedbacks. Cheers * -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Wed Apr 16 23:43:35 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages Message-ID: <258766.5645.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> http://www.blastwave.org/testing The latest glib2-2.16.x packages are being put in testing for review. I've also upgraded libcairo to better support SPARC-based and x86 video framebuffers. GTK2 was updated for better API support and improved memory handling. Feel free to stress test these packages as much as possible. Let us know if these packages work well for you for submittal in our unstable tree. ~K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil Thu Apr 17 01:28:48 2008 From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:28:48 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: <258766.5645.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <258766.5645.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I installed the new packages, along with the rest of the gnome 2.22 packages that are available in the testing branch. I still run into problems due to the older packages that have not been updated like gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there updated packages available for the complete gnome 2.22 install? -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of ken mays Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 3:44 PM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages http://www.blastwave.org/testing The latest glib2-2.16.x packages are being put in testing for review. I've also upgraded libcairo to better support SPARC-based and x86 video framebuffers. GTK2 was updated for better API support and improved memory handling. Feel free to stress test these packages as much as possible. Let us know if these packages work well for you for submittal in our unstable tree. ~K ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 17 06:58:15 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" wrote: > I installed the new packages, along with the rest of > the gnome 2.22 > packages that are available in the testing branch. > I still run into > problems due to the older packages that have not > been updated like > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there updated > packages available > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > The complete list of current gnome 2.22.x packages are: http://www.blastwave.org/testing -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays other 2775949 Apr 17 00:16 glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 2995267 Apr 17 00:16 glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 7718 Apr 17 00:28 gnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1588458 Apr 17 00:26 gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1688994 Apr 17 00:27 gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 10988168 Apr 16 13:32 gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 11575336 Apr 16 13:36 gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 974171 Apr 16 13:38 libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1030332 Apr 16 13:38 libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1520150 Apr 17 00:38 libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1528095 Apr 17 00:39 libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1243387 Apr 17 00:36 libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1303396 Apr 17 00:37 libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 796896 Apr 17 00:22 libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 858086 Apr 17 00:23 libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz and gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ~ Ken ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil Thu Apr 17 16:33:38 2008 From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:33:38 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: > --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" > wrote: > > I installed the new packages, along with the rest of > > the gnome 2.22 > > packages that are available in the testing branch. > > I still run into > > problems due to the older packages that have not > > been updated like > > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there updated > > packages available > > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > > > The complete list of current gnome 2.22.x packages > are: > http://www.blastwave.org/testing > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays other 2775949 Apr 17 00:16 > glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 2995267 Apr 17 00:16 > glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 7718 Apr 17 00:28 > gnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1588458 Apr 17 00:26 > gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1688994 Apr 17 00:27 > gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 10988168 Apr 16 13:32 > gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 11575336 Apr 16 13:36 > gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 974171 Apr 16 13:38 > libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1030332 Apr 16 13:38 > libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1520150 Apr 17 00:38 > libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1528095 Apr 17 00:39 > libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1243387 Apr 17 00:36 > libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1303396 Apr 17 00:37 > libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 796896 Apr 17 00:22 > libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 858086 Apr 17 00:23 > libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > and > gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ~ Ken I have installed the above packages without any problems on a Solaris 10 sparc machine. I just installed those packages over my existing Gnome install from unstable so the result is a mix of Gnome 2.22 and Gnome 2.16/2.14. The environment appears to be unstable, I experience lockups when clicking on elements in the gnome-panel, yelp does not seem to work, and the mouse pointer disappears. Should the above packages work with the rest of the gnome packages from unstable, or do I need to uninstall gnome and start from scratch? From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 17 16:34:50 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated GNOME packages submitted to unstable In-Reply-To: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <420240.57955.qm@web34204.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I've submitted the "bulk" of the GNOME 2.22 platform tree to Blastwave's unstable branch. This was needed for the newer evince, FireFox 3.0, and 4.0a1 compiles to work correctly. ~K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 17 17:24:28 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <471013.29263.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" wrote: > > > > > --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" > > wrote: > > > > I installed the new packages, along with the > rest of > > > the gnome 2.22 > > > packages that are available in the testing > branch. > > > I still run into > > > problems due to the older packages that have not > > > been updated like > > > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there > updated > > > packages available > > > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > > > > > I have installed the above packages without any > problems on a Solaris 10 > sparc machine. I just installed those packages over > my existing Gnome > install from unstable so the result is a mix of > Gnome 2.22 and Gnome > 2.16/2.14. The environment appears to be unstable, > I experience lockups > when clicking on elements in the gnome-panel, yelp > does not seem to > work, and the mouse pointer disappears. > > Should the above packages work with the rest of the > gnome packages from > unstable, or do I need to uninstall gnome and start > from scratch? I'm reviewing the older GTK 2.10.14 versus GTK 2.12.9 to see why there is a problem. Do you have Dbus/Hal running on your system? -K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil Thu Apr 17 18:07:19 2008 From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:07:19 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: <471013.29263.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <471013.29263.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: > > > --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" > > > wrote: > > > > > > I installed the new packages, along with the > > rest of > > > > the gnome 2.22 > > > > packages that are available in the testing > > branch. > > > > I still run into > > > > problems due to the older packages that have not > > > > been updated like > > > > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there > > updated > > > > packages available > > > > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > > > > > > > > I have installed the above packages without any > > problems on a Solaris 10 > > sparc machine. I just installed those packages over > > my existing Gnome > > install from unstable so the result is a mix of > > Gnome 2.22 and Gnome > > 2.16/2.14. The environment appears to be unstable, > > I experience lockups > > when clicking on elements in the gnome-panel, yelp > > does not seem to > > work, and the mouse pointer disappears. > > > > Should the above packages work with the rest of the > > gnome packages from > > unstable, or do I need to uninstall gnome and start > > from scratch? > > I'm reviewing the older GTK 2.10.14 versus GTK 2.12.9 > to see why there is a problem. Do you have Dbus/Hal > running on your system? dbus is running, hal is not. It may make a difference that we install all of the blastwave packages to a sever and then nfs mount /opt/csw. Are there scripts that need installed/adjusted on the machine for gnome 2.22? From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Apr 29 09:29:28 2008 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:29:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] Message-ID: <4816CE58.7080808@ericsson.com> Hi all, Latest week my CSW check command (pkg-get -c | egrep -v "Not installed|SAME|From") give me the following for evince: software localrev remoterev evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 Anybody who knows what's going on? BR MOL From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Tue Apr 29 10:53:48 2008 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:53:48 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] Message-ID: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> We had to rollback the version of evince which was in unstable to an older version, because the latest one had a missing dependencies (it was depending on a glib2 version which is not yet in the unstable catalog). though, this rollback process is gone too back in the past: it restored evince to 2 versions ago. so: - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007. 12.23 you are ok and you do not need to downgrade it to what is now in unstable - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 you should be ok anyway - if you have 2.22.x you are not ok: this version does not work due to a missing dependencies ----Messaggio originale---- Da: mats. larsson at ericsson.com Data: 29-apr-2008 9.29 A: "users at lists.blastwave. org >> questions and discussions" Ogg: [csw- users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] Hi all, Latest week my CSW check command (pkg-get -c | egrep -v "Not installed|SAME|From") give me the following for evince: software localrev remoterev evince 2.20.2, REV=2007.12.23 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 Anybody who knows what's going on? BR MOL _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From ml at eroteme.org Wed Apr 30 12:50:27 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:20:27 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) Message-ID: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Hi there, just upgraded my blastwave installs on the ol' OpenSolaris laptop (build 86), and evince is broken: When I run evince from command-line and open a pdf file (that is know to be good and obviously worked before), it dumps core and exits thusly: (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function (process:760): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gthread.c: line 228: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 792: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed The installed version is: [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep evince evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 SAME Can anyone advise? Thanks, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 13:59:48 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:59:48 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) In-Reply-To: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:50 AM, S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote: > Hi there, > > just upgraded my blastwave installs on the ol' OpenSolaris laptop > (build 86), and evince is broken: Would you please do the following : run /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U then /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | /usr/xpg4/bin/grep -E -v "Not|SAME" show me the output , it should look like this : # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | /usr/xpg4/bin/grep -E -v "Not|SAME" # (From site http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable ) software localrev remoterev # Dennis From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Wed Apr 30 16:43:07 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:43:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] In-Reply-To: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <4818857B.8010505@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Alessio Cervellin wrote: > We had to rollback the version of evince which was in unstable to an > older version, because the latest one had a missing dependencies (it > was depending on a glib2 version which is not yet in the unstable > catalog). > though, this rollback process is gone too back in the past: > it restored evince to 2 versions ago. > so: > - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007. > 12.23 you are ok and you do not need to downgrade it to what is now in > unstable > - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 you should be ok anyway > - > if you have 2.22.x you are not ok: this version does not work due to a > missing dependencies > hello, i just did an upgrade on my S10U2, and evince is broken due to: mombasa-henry% evince ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory Killed my workaround is the following: mombasa-root% ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3.0.0 /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.2 because mombasa-root% pkginfo -l CSWpoppler PKGINST: CSWpoppler NAME: poppler - pdf backend CATEGORY: application ARCH: sparc VERSION: 0.8.0,REV=2008.04.12 doesn't contains this release gerard From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Wed Apr 30 16:51:16 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:51:16 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] In-Reply-To: <4818857B.8010505@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> <4818857B.8010505@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <48188764.5010200@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Gerard Henry wrote: > Alessio Cervellin wrote: >> We had to rollback the version of evince which was in unstable to an >> older version, because the latest one had a missing dependencies (it >> was depending on a glib2 version which is not yet in the unstable >> catalog). >> though, this rollback process is gone too back in the past: >> it restored evince to 2 versions ago. >> so: >> - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007. >> 12.23 you are ok and you do not need to downgrade it to what is now in >> unstable >> - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 you should be ok anyway >> - >> if you have 2.22.x you are not ok: this version does not work due to a >> missing dependencies >> > > hello, > i just did an upgrade on my S10U2, and evince is broken due to: > mombasa-henry% evince > ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: No such file > or directory > Killed > > my workaround is the following: > mombasa-root% ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3.0.0 > /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.2 > > because > mombasa-root% pkginfo -l CSWpoppler > PKGINST: CSWpoppler > NAME: poppler - pdf backend > CATEGORY: application > ARCH: sparc > VERSION: 0.8.0,REV=2008.04.12 > doesn't contains this release > in fact, the best seems to downgrade poppler too: mombasa-root% /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U -s http://blastwave.solaris-fr.org/stable mombasa-root% /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -s http://blastwave.solaris-fr.org/stable -d poppler mombasa-root% pkgadd -d poppler-0.6.2,REV=2007.12.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg hth, gerard From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Apr 30 18:30:21 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:30:21 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) In-Reply-To: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: <48189E9D.7030405@acm.org> known problem, sorry... we will try to fix that asap S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote: > Hi there, > > just upgraded my blastwave installs on the ol' OpenSolaris laptop > (build 86), and evince is broken: > > When I run evince from command-line and open a pdf file (that is know > to be good and obviously worked before), it dumps core and exits thusly: > > (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization > assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function > > (process:760): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gthread.c: line 228: assertion > `initialization_value != 0' failed > > (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 792: > assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed > > The installed version is: > > [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep evince > evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 SAME > > Can anyone advise? > > Thanks, Hakim > From jeff at cjsa.com Wed Apr 30 20:11:19 2008 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:11:19 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: Just as another data point, I have evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 installed (rather than the version now in unstable) with an otherwise updated unstable release and when I attempt to run it I get: 294-> evince ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: \ No such file or directory Killed I searched blastewave and see that the missing library is in the CSWpoppler package which is not installed on my machine. How did this happen? Are the dependencies correct? However, the current CSWpoppler package only has: /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3 not "so.2", so installing it did not rectify the problem. Looks like this e3ntire package needs to be rebuilt ASAP. Regards, -- Jeff From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Apr 30 20:30:22 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:22 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) In-Reply-To: References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: <4818BABE.1010706@acm.org> all known issues, all already explained in this mailing list. again: latest evince has been built with latest poppler and latest glib2. latest poppler and latest evince have been released into the unstable catalog, but not glib2 (rejected due to the lack of testing) and this broke everything. an attempt to fix this has been made by Phil by restoring and older version of evince into the unstable catalog, but this does not fix the problem since poppler must be downgraded to. i'm now waiting for glib2 to be released, so i can release again the latest version of evince. alessio Jeffery Small wrote: > Just as another data point, I have evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 installed > (rather than the version now in unstable) with an otherwise updated > unstable release and when I attempt to run it I get: > > 294-> evince > ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: \ > No such file or directory > Killed > > I searched blastewave and see that the missing library is in the CSWpoppler > package which is not installed on my machine. How did this happen? Are the > dependencies correct? However, the current CSWpoppler package only has: > > /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3 > > not "so.2", so installing it did not rectify the problem. Looks like this > e3ntire package needs to be rebuilt ASAP. > > Regards, From SELundgr at uncc.edu Tue Apr 1 23:38:45 2008 From: SELundgr at uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:38:45 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap Message-ID: I installed the nmap package today: pkg-get -i nmap after a : pkg-get -u the dependencies were satfisfied then: selundgr at test-server $ nmap adtest.uncc.edu ld.so.1: nmap: fatal: libssl.so.0.9.8: open failed: No such file or directory Killed My bet is that I'm missing a symlink. Any guesses where it should go? Openssl package and libssl information follows: root at ics20 # pkginfo CSWossl application CSWossl openssl - Openssl meta package root at ics20 # pkginfo -l CSWossl PKGINST: CSWossl NAME: openssl - Openssl meta package CATEGORY: application ARCH: i386 VERSION: 0.9.8,REV=2007.12.26_rev=g VENDOR: http://www.openssl.org/source/ packaged for CSW by Yann Rouillard PSTAMP: yann at isis-20071226075042 INSTDATE: Apr 01 2008 13:30 HOTLINE: http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ EMAIL: yann at blastwave.org STATUS: completely installed FILES: 2 installed pathnames 1 directories 4 blocks used (approx) root at ics20 # find / -name libssl.* /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libssl.a /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.a /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.8.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.old /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20060301110719.14771 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.a /opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20080401132925.22343 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20050724221210.3344 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20051128112255.5690 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20061207214624.24159 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7.20070111110502.21757 /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8.20070111110502.21757 Scott Lundgren selundgr at uncc.edu University of North Carolina at Charlotte ITS - Web Services www.uncc.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 00:21:51 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:21:51 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Lundgren, Scott wrote: > My bet is that I'm missing a symlink. Any guesses where it should go? > Openssl package and libssl information follows: I've seen this before, the lib is copied but the symlinks are not created. Maybe there's something wrong with a pre/post-script since the package file list shows libssl.so.0.9.8. There's some preservation of old libs going on and maybe there's a problem there. Try: # cd /opt/csw/lib # ln -s libssl.so libssl.so.0.9.8 -- /peter From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 01:06:30 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:06:30 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> Hello Scott First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended the use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile or another start script. Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with the command below: ldd /nmap In my sample (below), I put the shared libraries of nmap in linux [root at cerberos ~]# which nmap /usr/bin/nmap [root at cerberos ~]# ldd /usr/bin/nmap linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00730000) libpcre.so.0 => /lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x040df000) libssl.so.6 => /lib/libssl.so.6 (0x035a3000) libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x033d9000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00c82000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00976000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00c29000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00834000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00777000) libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x0350e000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00745000) libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x0074a000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x007ee000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0099f000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x009be000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00817000) libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x007a7000) libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00772000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x006cf000) libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x006e8000) In these links, check if you don't have any with "not found", in this case, your system not recognize the path to lib (probably in /opt/csw/...) Third, you can check for dependence package in your system. Good luck and Waiting your answer ... Best Regards Waldirio 2008/4/1, Peter Bonivart : > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Lundgren, Scott > wrote: > > My bet is that I'm missing a symlink. Any guesses where it should go? > > Openssl package and libssl information follows: > > > I've seen this before, the lib is copied but the symlinks are not > created. Maybe there's something wrong with a pre/post-script since > the package file list shows libssl.so.0.9.8. There's some preservation > of old libs going on and maybe there's a problem there. > > Try: > > # cd /opt/csw/lib > # ln -s libssl.so libssl.so.0.9.8 > > > -- > /peter > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 01:15:36 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:15:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hello Scott > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended the > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile or > another start script. > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with the > command below: > > ldd /nmap > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is what I see : . . . Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner as ## Installing part 1 of 1. /opt/csw/bin/nmap /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe /opt/csw/bin/xnmap /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl [ verifying class ] Installation of was successful. # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 That looks perfect to me. What libs are you missing ? Dennis From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 01:24:31 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:24:31 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804011624k1b75f849m8d68343048f6d9ac@mail.gmail.com> Hello all Thanks Dennis, that's it # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8=> /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 Now, just check what library is missing in your system. []'s Waldirio 2008/4/1, Dennis Clarke : > > > > Hello Scott > > > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended > the > > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile > or > > another start script. > > > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with > the > > command below: > > > > ldd /nmap > > > > > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is what > I > see : > > . > . > . > Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner as > > > ## Installing part 1 of 1. > /opt/csw/bin/nmap > /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe > /opt/csw/bin/xnmap > /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl > [ verifying class ] > > Installation of was successful. > > # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8=> /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > > That looks perfect to me. > > What libs are you missing ? > > > Dennis > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 10:03:40 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:03:40 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 Message-ID: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From SELundgr at uncc.edu Wed Apr 2 15:56:48 2008 From: SELundgr at uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:56:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com><7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run this for me so I get the symlinks correct? cd /opt/csw/lib ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 Scott Lundgren selundgr at uncc.edu University of North Carolina at Charlotte ITS - Web Services www.uncc.edu -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+selundgr=uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr=uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Clarke Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:16 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] unhappy nmap > Hello Scott > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended the > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile or > another start script. > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with the > command below: > > ldd /nmap > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is what I see : . . . Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner as ## Installing part 1 of 1. /opt/csw/bin/nmap /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe /opt/csw/bin/xnmap /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl [ verifying class ] Installation of was successful. # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so libssl.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 That looks perfect to me. What libs are you missing ? Dennis _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 16:14:55 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:14:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott wrote: > Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run > this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > > cd /opt/csw/lib > ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 # ls -ld libssl.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> libssl.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.0.9.7 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 # ls -ld libcrypto.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is that the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) openssl_rt. -- /peter From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 16:21:09 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:21:09 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804020721q31befbe3kcc65e608d490ada3@mail.gmail.com> Hey Scott You can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH with the command [root at cerberos ~]# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH If you have return, e.g. /usr/lib, you can unset (command below) and try again [root at cerberos ~]# unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH or [root at cerberos ~]# LD_LIBRARY_PATH="";export LD_LIBRARY_PATH or if the problem persist, (this work, but i don't recommend ... is not beauty) is create the symbolic link ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 /lib ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 /lib Good luck. Waldirio 2008/4/2, Lundgren, Scott : > > Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run > this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > > cd cccc > ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > > libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > > /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > > Scott Lundgren > selundgr at uncc.edu > University of North Carolina at Charlotte > ITS - Web Services > www.uncc.edu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces+selundgr=uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org > [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr = > uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf > Of Dennis Clarke > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:16 PM > To: questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] unhappy nmap > > > > Hello Scott > > > > First, you can check the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH, isn't recommended > the > > use it. If the variable is set, comment, probably in your /etc/profile > or > > another start script. > > > > Second, you can check the shared libraries of the binary nmap, with > the > > command below: > > > > ldd /nmap > > > > I just installed nmap with "/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i nmap" and this is > what I > see : > > . > . > . > Installing nmap - A network exploration tool and security/port scanner > as > > > ## Installing part 1 of 1. > /opt/csw/bin/nmap > /opt/csw/bin/nmapfe > /opt/csw/bin/xnmap > /opt/csw/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/nmapfe.1 > /opt/csw/share/man/man1/xnmap.1 > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-mac-prefixes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-db > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-os-fingerprints > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-protocols > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-rpc > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap-services > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.dtd > /opt/csw/share/nmap/nmap.xsl > [ verifying class ] > > Installation of was successful. > > # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcre.so.0 > libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libpcap.so > libssl.so.0.9.8 => > /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libssl.so.0.9.8 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => > /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > > That looks perfect to me. > > What libs are you missing ? > > Dennis > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 17:05:08 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:05:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 In-Reply-To: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that > should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have > done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with > lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > The first thought that crosses my mind .. is how to best test it. Also, what rev of Solaris to test with. Dennis From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 17:09:32 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott wrote: >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct? >> >> cd /opt/csw/lib >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 >> >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) >> >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 >> >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 >> >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 >> >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > # ls -ld libssl.so* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> > libssl.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.0.9.7 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > # ls -ld libcrypto.so* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so -> > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is that > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. > > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) openssl_rt. > I'm trying to figure out how he broke it. - Dennis Clarke From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 17:45:59 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:45:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 In-Reply-To: <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <625385e30804020845i34fd05cdl619f9036da326e5b@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that > > should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have > > done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with > > lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > > > The first thought that crosses my mind .. is how to best test it. > Also, what rev of Solaris to test with. I would like feedback on anything from installation to how Perl scripts/apps work with it. I run it on a test system with Solaris 9 Sparc and in production on a Solaris 10 i386 system. The production system is very Perl intense with several apps/scripts that are constantly used but I share your concern how to fully test something like Perl. :-) If someone posted that they successfully installed the package on Solaris X arch Y and that "perl -V" worked would help to confirm that it's at least properly packaged. All efforts to help are most welcome no matter how basic or thorough they are, I would like to release these packages to unstable as soon as the stable freeze is over, I really need the IO update myself for MailScanner. -- /peter From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 18:30:19 2008 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:30:19 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [csw-users] /testing Perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 In-Reply-To: <625385e30804020845i34fd05cdl619f9036da326e5b@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804020103m21b82542t94961348b51247f5@mail.gmail.com> <2568.72.39.133.97.1207148708.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <625385e30804020845i34fd05cdl619f9036da326e5b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3019.72.39.133.97.1207153819.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> >> > I have built an updated Perl 5.8.8 with IO module version 1.2301, that >> > should be the only thing different from what's in unstable. I have >> > done some tests on sparc and i386 but it's an important package with >> > lots of dependencies so I would really like some feedback. >> > >> > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz >> > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> > >> >> The first thought that crosses my mind .. is how to best test it. >> Also, what rev of Solaris to test with. > > I would like feedback on anything from installation to how Perl > scripts/apps work with it. I run it on a test system with Solaris 9 > Sparc and in production on a Solaris 10 i386 system. The production > system is very Perl intense with several apps/scripts that are > constantly used but I share your concern how to fully test something > like Perl. :-) > > If someone posted that they successfully installed the package on > Solaris X arch Y and that "perl -V" worked would help to confirm that > it's at least properly packaged. All efforts to help are most welcome > no matter how basic or thorough they are, I would like to release > these packages to unstable as soon as the stable freeze is over, I > really need the IO update myself for MailScanner. Well, as you may have read in various lists, I have a few very old lowest common denominator machines here. One is a dual Pentium II machine with 768MB of memory and three SCSI controllers, dual IDE DVD burners, externally attached SCSI disks and a 8mm EXABYTE tape drive. If your perl software works there then we can say that it has been seen working on Solaris 8 x86. If it does not work there then we don't really know anything. The same is true with a Sun SparcStation 20 here. ========================================================================== Test (1) - Solaris 8 x86 # uname -a SunOS titan 5.8 Generic_117351-53 i86pc i386 i86pc # cat /etc/release Solaris 8 2/02 s28x_u7wos_08a INTEL Copyright 2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Assembled 18 December 2001 # pkgadd -d ./perl-5.8.8\,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg The following packages are available: 1 CSWperl perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (i386) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: Processing package instance from perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (i386) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 1, February 1989 . . . [ verifying class ] /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/psed /opt/csw/bin/pstruct /opt/csw/share/man/man1/c2ph.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/s2p.1 Installation of was successful. # # file /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/perl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped # ldd /opt/csw/bin/perl libperl.so.5.8.8 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libperl.so.5.8.8 libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libdb-4.4.so => /opt/csw/bdb44/lib/libdb-4.4.so libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libm.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 # # /opt/csw/bin/perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: Platform: osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=i86pc-solaris-thread-multi uname='sunos thor 5.8 generic_117351-51 i86pc i386 i86pc' config_args='' hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define usemultiplicity=define useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=generic -xarch=generic -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64', optimize='-xO3 -xtarget=generic -xarch=generic', cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=generic -xarch=generic -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include' ccversion='Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-07 2007/10/03', gccversion='', gccosandvers='' intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=1234 d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=12 ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8 alignbytes=4, prototype=define Linker and Libraries: ld='cc', ldflags ='-L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' libpth=/usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib /lib /opt/csw/lib libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8 gnulibc_version='' Dynamic Linking: dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-R /opt/csw/lib' cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API USE_SITECUSTOMIZE Built under solaris Compiled at Mar 25 2008 09:26:28 @INC: /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/lib/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw . # ======================================================================== Test (2) - Solaris 8 Sparc # uname -a SunOS fossil 5.8 Generic_117350-51 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20 # cat /etc/release Solaris 8 2/04 s28s_hw4wos_05a SPARC Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Assembled 08 January 2004 # # pkgadd -d ./perl-5.8.8\,REV=2008.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg The following packages are available: 1 CSWperl perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (sparc) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: Processing package instance from perl - A high-level, general-purpose programming language. (sparc) 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 1, February 1989 Copyright (C) 1989 Free Software Foundation, Inc. . . . [ verifying class ] /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/psed /opt/csw/bin/pstruct /opt/csw/share/man/man1/c2ph.1 /opt/csw/share/man/man1/s2p.1 Installation of was successful. # # file /opt/csw/bin/perl /opt/csw/bin/perl: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped # ldd /opt/csw/bin/perl libperl.so.5.8.8 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libperl.so.5.8.8 libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libdb-4.4.so => /opt/csw/bdb44/lib/libdb-4.4.so libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libm.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 libthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 # # /opt/csw/bin/perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: Platform: osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=sun4-solaris-thread-multi uname='sunos ra 5.8 generic_117350-51 sun4u sparc sunw,sun-blade-1000' config_args='' hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define usemultiplicity=define useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64', optimize='-xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8', cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include' ccversion='Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-06 2007/10/03', gccversion='', gccosandvers='' intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=4321 d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=16 ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8 alignbytes=8, prototype=define Linker and Libraries: ld='cc', ldflags ='-L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/v8plus -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' libpth=/usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/v8plus /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib /lib /opt/csw/lib libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8 gnulibc_version='' Dynamic Linking: dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-R /opt/csw/lib' cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/v8plus -L/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -L/lib' Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API USE_SITECUSTOMIZE Built under solaris Compiled at Mar 25 2008 11:07:21 @INC: /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8 /opt/csw/lib/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw /opt/csw/share/perl/csw . # ====================================================================== Looks good. Dennis From dam at blastwave.org Wed Apr 2 19:29:12 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:29:12 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] zsh 4.3.6 in testing Message-ID: Hi, finally all the failing zsh-tests have been fixed upstream and there is now a superclean zsh 4.3.6 in testing/: zsh-4.3.6,REV=2008.04.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz zsh-4.3.6,REV=2008.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Feedback as always welcome! -- Dago From selundgr at uncc.edu Fri Apr 4 21:03:29 2008 From: selundgr at uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:03:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com><7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com><4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: I'm afraid I can't shed light in how I broke it as I belive it was just the sequnce of packages that were being upgraded during the 'pkg- get -a' that removed a symlink that was needed & didn't put it back. If there are logs that I can provide to help let me know but my problem is solved thank you blastwave community! - SL On April 2, 2008, at 10:09 AM, "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott > wrote: > >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can > someone run > >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > >> > >> cd /opt/csw/lib > >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > >> > >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> > >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > >> > >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > >> > >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > >> > >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > > > # ls -ld libssl.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> > > libssl.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 > > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so. > 0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so. > 0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > # ls -ld libcrypto.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so > -> > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so. > 0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so. > 0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > > > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is > > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is > that > > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be > > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. > > > > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) > openssl_rt. > > > > I'm trying to figure out how he broke it. > > - > Dennis Clarke > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Apr 4 21:45:03 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:45:03 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core In-Reply-To: <479F5615.4070403@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca> <479F5615.4070403@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <47F6853F.3030508@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Oscar del Rio a ?crit : >> # ls -ld X11 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 34 Jan 29 11:12 X11 >> -> root/usr/openwin/share/include/X11 >> ^^^^ known bug: http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0002810 From waldirio at gmail.com Sat Apr 5 01:25:57 2008 From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:25:57 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] unhappy nmap In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804011521p4dba477fnfdba0231d37bd91e@mail.gmail.com> <7df9f1820804011606t357071e5wb7ea00fc7512c99d@mail.gmail.com> <4770.72.39.133.97.1207091736.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <625385e30804020714o487b01d5q849183b5515418a4@mail.gmail.com> <2576.72.39.133.97.1207148972.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7df9f1820804041625y7b511f51k6cb382f031f749d2@mail.gmail.com> Hello Scott Nice ..., any problem ... write here .. ;) Best Regards Waldirio 2008/4/4, Scott Lundgren : > > > > I'm afraid I can't shed light in how I broke it as I belive it was just > the sequnce of packages that were being upgraded during the 'pkg-get -a' > that removed a symlink that was needed & didn't put it back. > > > If there are logs that I can provide to help let me know but my problem > is solved thank you blastwave community! > > > - SL > > On April 2, 2008, at 10:09 AM, "Dennis Clarke" > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott > wrote: > >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can someone run > >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct? > >> > >> cd /opt/csw/lib > >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8 > >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > >> > >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap > >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0 > >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so > >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found) > >> > >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 > >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 > >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 > >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1 > >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1 > >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1 > >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > >> > >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1 > >> > >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > >> > >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 > > > > # ls -ld libssl.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so -> > > libssl.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003 > > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006 > > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > # ls -ld libcrypto.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so -> > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006 > > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803 > > > > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is > > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is that > > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be > > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above. > > > > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get) > openssl_rt. > > > > I'm trying to figure out how he broke it. > > - > Dennis Clarke > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: wmp at sinope.com.br Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From william at wbonnet.net Sun Apr 6 17:18:19 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:18:19 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Eclipse 3.3.2 is available Message-ID: <47F8E9BB.4060508@wbonnet.net> Hi I'm pleased to let you know that Eclipse Europa 3.3.2 is now available for download on both SPARC and x86 platform. Eclipse package has been split in two : . EclipseCmn, which contains the architecture independant files (like html, some jars, etc.) . Eclipse, which contains the architecture dependant file (like eclipse executable, gtk bindings, etc.) Thus you have to install eclipsecmn, then eclipse package. Dependancy on swtlib has been removed since eclipse is build with embedded gtk support and libs. Packages are available from testing : http://www.blastwave.org/testing Direct access url are : Eclipse Common : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipsecmn-3.3.2,REV=2008.03.30-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz Eclipse i386 : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.3.2,REV=2008.03.30-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Eclipse SPARC : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.3.2,REV=2008.03.30-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Please let me know if you have any problem using it. Cheers, -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Wed Apr 9 00:04:08 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:04:08 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Tomcat 4, 5 and 6 are available Message-ID: <47FBEBD8.202@wbonnet.net> Hi Packages for tomcat 4, 5 and 6 have been released to testing. Please report me any problem. Tomcat 4 is upgraded to 4.1.37 Tomcat 5 is upgraded to 5.5.26 Tomcat 6 is upgraded to 6.0.16 The packages support SMF. cheers -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From zizban at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 02:10:42 2008 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:10:42 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Mplayer Question Message-ID: I am using Mplayer on Solaris x86. My sound card works fine with Solaris but I get no sound using Mplayer. What sound output do I use? I tried a few already without any luck. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwheeler at blastwave.org Wed Apr 9 14:08:07 2008 From: jwheeler at blastwave.org (Jonathan Wheeler) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:08:07 +1200 Subject: [csw-users] Mplayer Question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47FCB1A7.8070107@blastwave.org> Chris Turkel wrote: > I am using Mplayer on Solaris x86. My sound card works fine with Solaris > but I get no sound using Mplayer. What sound output do I use? I tried a > few already without any luck. Hi Chris, The plain "sun" driver worked for me, and I used this initially for some months. Later I installed decided to check out OSS, and that what I'm still using today. To be honest I have no idea what "sun" is, or how it works, but it worked for me out of the box. If that's not working for you, I can at least confirm that OSS also works under solaris/mplayer. Jonathan From zizban at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 14:34:56 2008 From: zizban at gmail.com (Chris Turkel) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:34:56 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Mplayer Question In-Reply-To: <47FCB1A7.8070107@blastwave.org> References: <47FCB1A7.8070107@blastwave.org> Message-ID: Right after I sent the email, I figured it out. I never thought to try to the sun driver on x86. I dunno why. Works fine now. On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Jonathan Wheeler wrote: > Chris Turkel wrote: > > I am using Mplayer on Solaris x86. My sound card works fine with Solaris > > but I get no sound using Mplayer. What sound output do I use? I tried a > > few already without any luck. > > Hi Chris, > > The plain "sun" driver worked for me, and I used this initially for some > months. Later I installed decided to check out OSS, and that what I'm > still using today. > > To be honest I have no idea what "sun" is, or how it works, but it > worked for me out of the box. If that's not working for you, I can at > least confirm that OSS also works under solaris/mplayer. > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Apr 9 21:27:10 2008 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:27:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request Message-ID: Hello - I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! -Jon ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Apr 9 21:49:36 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:49:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Fechner, Jon L. wrote: > Hello ? > > > > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released from > http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant bug > fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? > > > > Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! A new stable release is under way as we speak so it will not be in that one but it should be possible to release it to unstable as soon as stable is done. We also need a new maintainer for it. Would you be interested? -- /peter From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Apr 9 22:19:50 2008 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:19:50 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Peter Bonivart Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:50 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Fechner, Jon L. wrote: > Hello - > > > > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released from > http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant bug > fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? > > > > Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! A new stable release is under way as we speak so it will not be in that one but it should be possible to release it to unstable as soon as stable is done. We also need a new maintainer for it. Would you be interested? -- /peter _______________________________________________ [Fechner, Jon L.] Sorry Peter, I am just the installer, I don't use the tool. -Jon ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ From shuttlebox at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 16:12:03 2008 From: shuttlebox at gmail.com (shuttlebox) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:12:03 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30804091249me2874c1pf0c54e23e1ad4698@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e30804100712o5a4be5a4r4eb62594e11e3756@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Fechner, Jon L. wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org > [mailto:users-bounces+jon.fechner=tellabs.com at lists.blastwave.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Bonivart > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:50 PM > To: questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Fechner, Jon L. > wrote: > > Hello - > > > > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released > from > > http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides significant > bug > > fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next stable release? > > > > Thanks for all you do Blastwave community! > > A new stable release is under way as we speak so it will not be in > that one but it should be possible to release it to unstable as soon > as stable is done. We also need a new maintainer for it. Would you be > interested? > > [Fechner, Jon L.] > Sorry Peter, I am just the installer, I don't use the tool. I gave it a shot even though I know nothing about it. You can download from testing if you want to try it: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/cscope-15.6,REV=2008.04.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/cscope-15.6,REV=2008.04.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Post problems here, also let us know if it's OK so it can be released to unstable. -- /peter From dam at blastwave.org Thu Apr 10 16:31:40 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:31:40 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> Hi Jon, Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was > released from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and > provides significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in > the next stable release? > If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I packaged some time ago in testing: There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. Best regards -- Dago From karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com Thu Apr 10 21:30:13 2008 From: karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com (Thiele, Karl D (Karl)) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:30:13 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> References: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Folks, If you use this with C++ there is a bug, I fixed it about 1 year ago, very simple fix and documented at scope site. Does not parse fully qualified members in function calls. It did not recognise "::" believe fix in fscanner.l I believe it is : (been a while and I do not have the time at the moment to make a diff....) the "::" { {ws}*\(({wsnl}|{identifier}|{number}|"::"|[*&[\]=,.])*\)([()]|{wsnl})*[: a-zA-Z_#{] { -karl -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave. org] On Behalf Of Dagobert Michelsen Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:32 AM To: questions and discussions; Fechner, Jon L. Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request Hi Jon, Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: > I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was released > from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides > significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next > stable release? > If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I packaged some time ago in testing: There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dam at blastwave.org Fri Apr 11 09:16:44 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:16:44 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> References: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Message-ID: Hi Karl, Am 10.04.2008 um 21:30 schrieb Thiele, Karl D (Karl): >> Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: >>> I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was >>> released >>> from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and provides >>> significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in the next >>> stable release? >> >> If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I >> packaged some time ago in testing: >> > SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz> >> There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. >> > > If you use this with C++ there is a bug, I fixed it about 1 year ago, > very simple fix and > documented at scope site. Does not parse fully qualified members in > function calls. > It did not recognise "::" believe fix in fscanner.l > > I believe it is : (been a while and I do not have the time at the > moment to make a diff....) the "::" > > { > {ws}*\(({wsnl}|{identifier}|{number}|"::"|[*&[\]=,.])*\)([()]| > {wsnl})*[: > a-zA-Z_#{] { Are you referring to cscope or OpenGrok here? Do you have a link to the bug report? Best regards -- Dago From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Apr 11 13:25:29 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:25:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] rapidsvn doesn't work on SXDE 1/08? Message-ID: <47FF4AA9.3020701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i installed rapidsvn on sxde 1/08 (x86). When using it on remote machine (sunray solaris 10), it works. When trying to use it directly on sxde, i got this error: yakari-henry% rapidsvn Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": ld.so.1: rapidsvn: fatal: libgnomebreakpad.so: open failed: No such file or directory The program 'rapidsvn' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'. (Details: serial 299 error_code 11 request_code 147 minor_code 5) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) looking at process rapidsvn with pldd when it works on remote login, i see no libgnomebreakpad.so: yakari-henry% pldd 8184 | grep gnome /opt/csw/lib/libgnomeprint-2-2.so.0.1.0 /opt/csw/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.so.0.1.0 /opt/csw/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.1400.0 In two cases, the same binary is launched on the same machine, it is only DISPLAY that's different. Anyone has got the same problem? thanks for help, gerard From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Apr 11 14:46:32 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:46:32 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] meld doesn't work on solaris 10? Message-ID: <47FF5DA8.4020001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i've installed meld on SXDE 1/08, and it works well. On S10, it doesn't: w2100-henry% meld Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/meld", line 81, in import meldapp File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/meldapp.py", line 27, in import prefs File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/prefs.py", line 52, in import gconf ImportError: No module named gconf Looking at what happens on sxde, i see that: yakari-root% pldd 11175|grep conf /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gconf.so /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.2 so it seems that in sxde, it depends on OS ressource (SUNWgnome-python-libs), and that ressource doesn't exist on solaris 10 Any idea, gerard From karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com Fri Apr 11 16:35:45 2008 From: karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com (Thiele, Karl D (Karl)) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:35:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request In-Reply-To: References: <63D37B43-716A-420E-963C-96FC5F884FBD@blastwave.org> <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609D4C6FC@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Message-ID: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB62609DB7E43@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Hi Dago, I forwarded you email on the fix, cscope is realy for "C" not C++, but it will work with C++ and Java. I use "source navigator" more than cscope. -kalr -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+karl.d.thiele=verizonbusiness.com at lists.blastwave. org] On Behalf Of Dagobert Michelsen Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 3:17 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] cscope version 15.6 request Hi Karl, Am 10.04.2008 um 21:30 schrieb Thiele, Karl D (Karl): >> Am 09.04.2008 um 21:27 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.: >>> I have an engineer that is asking for cscope v15.6 which was >>> released from http://cscope.sourceforge.net/ on 11/29/2006 and >>> provides significant bug fixes. Is there any way we can get that in >>> the next stable release? >> >> If you like cscope you may also be interested in OpenGrok which I >> packaged some time ago in testing: >> > SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz> >> There is a 0.6 which I'll package if there is enough interest. >> > > If you use this with C++ there is a bug, I fixed it about 1 year ago, > very simple fix and documented at scope site. Does not parse fully > qualified members in function calls. > It did not recognise "::" believe fix in fscanner.l > > I believe it is : (been a while and I do not have the time at the > moment to make a diff....) the "::" > > { > {ws}*\(({wsnl}|{identifier}|{number}|"::"|[*&[\]=,.])*\)([()]| > {wsnl})*[: > a-zA-Z_#{] { Are you referring to cscope or OpenGrok here? Do you have a link to the bug report? Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From a.cervellin at acm.org Sat Apr 12 14:53:23 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:53:23 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing evince 2.22.1 Message-ID: <4800B0C3.9040809@acm.org> evince 2.22.1 is available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing it requires poppler 0.8.0, always on http://www.blastwave.org/testing From william at wbonnet.net Sat Apr 12 23:15:49 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:15:49 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing JBoss 4.2.2.GA is available Message-ID: <48012685.3020009@wbonnet.net> Hi *JBoss package has been updated to latest community stable version. Thank you for your feedbacks. Cheers * -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Wed Apr 16 23:43:35 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages Message-ID: <258766.5645.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> http://www.blastwave.org/testing The latest glib2-2.16.x packages are being put in testing for review. I've also upgraded libcairo to better support SPARC-based and x86 video framebuffers. GTK2 was updated for better API support and improved memory handling. Feel free to stress test these packages as much as possible. Let us know if these packages work well for you for submittal in our unstable tree. ~K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil Thu Apr 17 01:28:48 2008 From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:28:48 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: <258766.5645.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <258766.5645.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I installed the new packages, along with the rest of the gnome 2.22 packages that are available in the testing branch. I still run into problems due to the older packages that have not been updated like gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there updated packages available for the complete gnome 2.22 install? -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+josh.leavitt=hill.af.mil at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of ken mays Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 3:44 PM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages http://www.blastwave.org/testing The latest glib2-2.16.x packages are being put in testing for review. I've also upgraded libcairo to better support SPARC-based and x86 video framebuffers. GTK2 was updated for better API support and improved memory handling. Feel free to stress test these packages as much as possible. Let us know if these packages work well for you for submittal in our unstable tree. ~K ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 17 06:58:15 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" wrote: > I installed the new packages, along with the rest of > the gnome 2.22 > packages that are available in the testing branch. > I still run into > problems due to the older packages that have not > been updated like > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there updated > packages available > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > The complete list of current gnome 2.22.x packages are: http://www.blastwave.org/testing -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays other 2775949 Apr 17 00:16 glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 2995267 Apr 17 00:16 glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 7718 Apr 17 00:28 gnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1588458 Apr 17 00:26 gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1688994 Apr 17 00:27 gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 10988168 Apr 16 13:32 gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 11575336 Apr 16 13:36 gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 974171 Apr 16 13:38 libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1030332 Apr 16 13:38 libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1520150 Apr 17 00:38 libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1528095 Apr 17 00:39 libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1243387 Apr 17 00:36 libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1303396 Apr 17 00:37 libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 796896 Apr 17 00:22 libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 858086 Apr 17 00:23 libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz and gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ~ Ken ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil Thu Apr 17 16:33:38 2008 From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:33:38 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: > --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" > wrote: > > I installed the new packages, along with the rest of > > the gnome 2.22 > > packages that are available in the testing branch. > > I still run into > > problems due to the older packages that have not > > been updated like > > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there updated > > packages available > > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > > > The complete list of current gnome 2.22.x packages > are: > http://www.blastwave.org/testing > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays other 2775949 Apr 17 00:16 > glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 2995267 Apr 17 00:16 > glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 7718 Apr 17 00:28 > gnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1588458 Apr 17 00:26 > gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1688994 Apr 17 00:27 > gnomevfs2-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 10988168 Apr 16 13:32 > gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 11575336 Apr 16 13:36 > gtk2-2.12.9-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 974171 Apr 16 13:38 > libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1030332 Apr 16 13:38 > libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1520150 Apr 17 00:38 > libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1528095 Apr 17 00:39 > libgnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1243387 Apr 17 00:36 > libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 1303396 Apr 17 00:37 > libgnomeui-2.22.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 796896 Apr 17 00:22 > libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rwxrwxrwx 1 kenmays csw 858086 Apr 17 00:23 > libpango-1.20.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > and > gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ~ Ken I have installed the above packages without any problems on a Solaris 10 sparc machine. I just installed those packages over my existing Gnome install from unstable so the result is a mix of Gnome 2.22 and Gnome 2.16/2.14. The environment appears to be unstable, I experience lockups when clicking on elements in the gnome-panel, yelp does not seem to work, and the mouse pointer disappears. Should the above packages work with the rest of the gnome packages from unstable, or do I need to uninstall gnome and start from scratch? From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 17 16:34:50 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated GNOME packages submitted to unstable In-Reply-To: <749923.54772.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <420240.57955.qm@web34204.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I've submitted the "bulk" of the GNOME 2.22 platform tree to Blastwave's unstable branch. This was needed for the newer evince, FireFox 3.0, and 4.0a1 compiles to work correctly. ~K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 17 17:24:28 2008 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <471013.29263.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" wrote: > > > > > --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" > > wrote: > > > > I installed the new packages, along with the > rest of > > > the gnome 2.22 > > > packages that are available in the testing > branch. > > > I still run into > > > problems due to the older packages that have not > > > been updated like > > > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there > updated > > > packages available > > > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > > > > > I have installed the above packages without any > problems on a Solaris 10 > sparc machine. I just installed those packages over > my existing Gnome > install from unstable so the result is a mix of > Gnome 2.22 and Gnome > 2.16/2.14. The environment appears to be unstable, > I experience lockups > when clicking on elements in the gnome-panel, yelp > does not seem to > work, and the mouse pointer disappears. > > Should the above packages work with the rest of the > gnome packages from > unstable, or do I need to uninstall gnome and start > from scratch? I'm reviewing the older GTK 2.10.14 versus GTK 2.12.9 to see why there is a problem. Do you have Dbus/Hal running on your system? -K ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil Thu Apr 17 18:07:19 2008 From: Josh.Leavitt at HILL.af.mil (Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:07:19 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Updated Glib2, libcairo, and GTK2 (GTK+) packages In-Reply-To: <471013.29263.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <471013.29263.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: > > > --- "Leavitt, Josh Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEB" > > > wrote: > > > > > > I installed the new packages, along with the > > rest of > > > > the gnome 2.22 > > > > packages that are available in the testing > > branch. > > > > I still run into > > > > problems due to the older packages that have not > > > > been updated like > > > > gnome_panel, gnome_session, etc. Are there > > updated > > > > packages available > > > > for the complete gnome 2.22 install? > > > > > > > > I have installed the above packages without any > > problems on a Solaris 10 > > sparc machine. I just installed those packages over > > my existing Gnome > > install from unstable so the result is a mix of > > Gnome 2.22 and Gnome > > 2.16/2.14. The environment appears to be unstable, > > I experience lockups > > when clicking on elements in the gnome-panel, yelp > > does not seem to > > work, and the mouse pointer disappears. > > > > Should the above packages work with the rest of the > > gnome packages from > > unstable, or do I need to uninstall gnome and start > > from scratch? > > I'm reviewing the older GTK 2.10.14 versus GTK 2.12.9 > to see why there is a problem. Do you have Dbus/Hal > running on your system? dbus is running, hal is not. It may make a difference that we install all of the blastwave packages to a sever and then nfs mount /opt/csw. Are there scripts that need installed/adjusted on the machine for gnome 2.22? From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Apr 29 09:29:28 2008 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:29:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] Message-ID: <4816CE58.7080808@ericsson.com> Hi all, Latest week my CSW check command (pkg-get -c | egrep -v "Not installed|SAME|From") give me the following for evince: software localrev remoterev evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 Anybody who knows what's going on? BR MOL From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Tue Apr 29 10:53:48 2008 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:53:48 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] Message-ID: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> We had to rollback the version of evince which was in unstable to an older version, because the latest one had a missing dependencies (it was depending on a glib2 version which is not yet in the unstable catalog). though, this rollback process is gone too back in the past: it restored evince to 2 versions ago. so: - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007. 12.23 you are ok and you do not need to downgrade it to what is now in unstable - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 you should be ok anyway - if you have 2.22.x you are not ok: this version does not work due to a missing dependencies ----Messaggio originale---- Da: mats. larsson at ericsson.com Data: 29-apr-2008 9.29 A: "users at lists.blastwave. org >> questions and discussions" Ogg: [csw- users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] Hi all, Latest week my CSW check command (pkg-get -c | egrep -v "Not installed|SAME|From") give me the following for evince: software localrev remoterev evince 2.20.2, REV=2007.12.23 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 Anybody who knows what's going on? BR MOL _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave. org/mailman/listinfo/users From ml at eroteme.org Wed Apr 30 12:50:27 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:20:27 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) Message-ID: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Hi there, just upgraded my blastwave installs on the ol' OpenSolaris laptop (build 86), and evince is broken: When I run evince from command-line and open a pdf file (that is know to be good and obviously worked before), it dumps core and exits thusly: (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function (process:760): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gthread.c: line 228: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 792: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed The installed version is: [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep evince evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 SAME Can anyone advise? Thanks, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 13:59:48 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:59:48 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) In-Reply-To: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:50 AM, S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote: > Hi there, > > just upgraded my blastwave installs on the ol' OpenSolaris laptop > (build 86), and evince is broken: Would you please do the following : run /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U then /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | /usr/xpg4/bin/grep -E -v "Not|SAME" show me the output , it should look like this : # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | /usr/xpg4/bin/grep -E -v "Not|SAME" # (From site http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable ) software localrev remoterev # Dennis From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Wed Apr 30 16:43:07 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:43:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] In-Reply-To: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <4818857B.8010505@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Alessio Cervellin wrote: > We had to rollback the version of evince which was in unstable to an > older version, because the latest one had a missing dependencies (it > was depending on a glib2 version which is not yet in the unstable > catalog). > though, this rollback process is gone too back in the past: > it restored evince to 2 versions ago. > so: > - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007. > 12.23 you are ok and you do not need to downgrade it to what is now in > unstable > - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 you should be ok anyway > - > if you have 2.22.x you are not ok: this version does not work due to a > missing dependencies > hello, i just did an upgrade on my S10U2, and evince is broken due to: mombasa-henry% evince ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory Killed my workaround is the following: mombasa-root% ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3.0.0 /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.2 because mombasa-root% pkginfo -l CSWpoppler PKGINST: CSWpoppler NAME: poppler - pdf backend CATEGORY: application ARCH: sparc VERSION: 0.8.0,REV=2008.04.12 doesn't contains this release gerard From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Wed Apr 30 16:51:16 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:51:16 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: CSW updates available] In-Reply-To: <4818857B.8010505@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <11999633df3.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> <4818857B.8010505@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <48188764.5010200@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Gerard Henry wrote: > Alessio Cervellin wrote: >> We had to rollback the version of evince which was in unstable to an >> older version, because the latest one had a missing dependencies (it >> was depending on a glib2 version which is not yet in the unstable >> catalog). >> though, this rollback process is gone too back in the past: >> it restored evince to 2 versions ago. >> so: >> - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007. >> 12.23 you are ok and you do not need to downgrade it to what is now in >> unstable >> - if you have 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 you should be ok anyway >> - >> if you have 2.22.x you are not ok: this version does not work due to a >> missing dependencies >> > > hello, > i just did an upgrade on my S10U2, and evince is broken due to: > mombasa-henry% evince > ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: No such file > or directory > Killed > > my workaround is the following: > mombasa-root% ln -s /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3.0.0 > /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.2 > > because > mombasa-root% pkginfo -l CSWpoppler > PKGINST: CSWpoppler > NAME: poppler - pdf backend > CATEGORY: application > ARCH: sparc > VERSION: 0.8.0,REV=2008.04.12 > doesn't contains this release > in fact, the best seems to downgrade poppler too: mombasa-root% /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U -s http://blastwave.solaris-fr.org/stable mombasa-root% /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -s http://blastwave.solaris-fr.org/stable -d poppler mombasa-root% pkgadd -d poppler-0.6.2,REV=2007.12.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg hth, gerard From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Apr 30 18:30:21 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:30:21 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) In-Reply-To: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: <48189E9D.7030405@acm.org> known problem, sorry... we will try to fix that asap S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote: > Hi there, > > just upgraded my blastwave installs on the ol' OpenSolaris laptop > (build 86), and evince is broken: > > When I run evince from command-line and open a pdf file (that is know > to be good and obviously worked before), it dumps core and exits thusly: > > (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization > assertion failed, use g_type_init() prior to this function > > (process:760): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gthread.c: line 228: assertion > `initialization_value != 0' failed > > (process:760): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 792: > assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed > > The installed version is: > > [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep evince > evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.05 SAME > > Can anyone advise? > > Thanks, Hakim > From jeff at cjsa.com Wed Apr 30 20:11:19 2008 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:11:19 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: Just as another data point, I have evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 installed (rather than the version now in unstable) with an otherwise updated unstable release and when I attempt to run it I get: 294-> evince ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: \ No such file or directory Killed I searched blastewave and see that the missing library is in the CSWpoppler package which is not installed on my machine. How did this happen? Are the dependencies correct? However, the current CSWpoppler package only has: /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3 not "so.2", so installing it did not rectify the problem. Looks like this e3ntire package needs to be rebuilt ASAP. Regards, -- Jeff From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Apr 30 20:30:22 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:22 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Evince broken after update (Apr 30) In-Reply-To: References: <20080430152027.00006bb0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: <4818BABE.1010706@acm.org> all known issues, all already explained in this mailing list. again: latest evince has been built with latest poppler and latest glib2. latest poppler and latest evince have been released into the unstable catalog, but not glib2 (rejected due to the lack of testing) and this broke everything. an attempt to fix this has been made by Phil by restoring and older version of evince into the unstable catalog, but this does not fix the problem since poppler must be downgraded to. i'm now waiting for glib2 to be released, so i can release again the latest version of evince. alessio Jeffery Small wrote: > Just as another data point, I have evince 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 installed > (rather than the version now in unstable) with an otherwise updated > unstable release and when I attempt to run it I get: > > 294-> evince > ld.so.1: evince: fatal: libpoppler-glib.so.2: open failed: \ > No such file or directory > Killed > > I searched blastewave and see that the missing library is in the CSWpoppler > package which is not installed on my machine. How did this happen? Are the > dependencies correct? However, the current CSWpoppler package only has: > > /opt/csw/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.3 > > not "so.2", so installing it did not rectify the problem. Looks like this > e3ntire package needs to be rebuilt ASAP. > > Regards,