[csw-users] unhappy nmap
Scott Lundgren
selundgr at uncc.edu
Fri Apr 4 21:03:29 CEST 2008
I'm afraid I can't shed light in how I broke it as I belive it was
just the sequnce of packages that were being upgraded during the 'pkg-
get -a' that removed a symlink that was needed & didn't put it back.
If there are logs that I can provide to help let me know but my
problem is solved thank you blastwave community!
- SL
On April 2, 2008, at 10:09 AM, "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org>
wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Lundgren, Scott
> <SELundgr at uncc.edu> wrote:
> >> Thank you everyone, I'm headed in the right direction. Can
> someone run
> >> this for me so I get the symlinks correct?
> >>
> >> cd /opt/csw/lib
> >> ls -l libssl.so.0.9.8
> >> ls -l libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> >>
> >> root at ics20 # ldd /opt/csw/bin/nmap
> >> libpcre.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libpcre.so.0
> >> libpcap.so => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libpcap.so
> >> libssl.so.0.9.8 => (file not found)
> >> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => (file not found)
> >>
> >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1
> >> libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1
> >> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1
> >> libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1
> >> libCstd.so.1 => /lib/libCstd.so.1
> >> libCrun.so.1 => /lib/libCrun.so.1
> >> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
> >>
> >> libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1
> >> libmd5.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd5.so.1
> >>
> >> libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
> >>
> >> libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2
> >> /usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libCstd_isa.so.1
> >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1
> >> /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1
> >
> > # ls -ld libssl.so*
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 24 2007 libssl.so ->
> > libssl.so.0.9.8
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 296192 Jul 30 2003
> > libssl.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 274856 Aug 23 2007 libssl.so.
> 0.9.7
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 291196 Sep 29 2006
> > libssl.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 352112 Aug 22 2007 libssl.so.
> 0.9.8
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 367904 Sep 29 2006
> > libssl.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803
> > # ls -ld libcrypto.so*
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Sep 24 2007 libcrypto.so
> ->
> > libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1598904 Jul 30 2003
> > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.20070924163933.4803
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1925812 Aug 23 2007 libcrypto.so.
> 0.9.7
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2146860 Sep 29 2006
> > libcrypto.so.0.9.7.20070924163933.4803
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2153520 Aug 22 2007 libcrypto.so.
> 0.9.8
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 2374244 Sep 29 2006
> > libcrypto.so.0.9.8.20070924163933.4803
> >
> > I remembered it incorrectly, what happens if I now got it right is
> > that you get libssl.so.0.9.8 as libssl.so. What should happen is
> that
> > the actual lib should be libssl.so.0.9.8 and a symlink should be
> > created to point at it from libssl.so. See my files above.
> >
> > Either you fix it manually or try to reinstall (pkgrm/pkg-get)
> openssl_rt.
> >
>
> I'm trying to figure out how he broke it.
>
> -
> Dennis Clarke
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080404/c745e74d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the users
mailing list