From ihsan at blastwave.org  Fri Aug  1 21:23:13 2008
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:23:13 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Question about setting up digital signature
 checking in	Blastwave
In-Reply-To: <DB19C4D58E761B4DBB2D9071171599390156B2DE@SWIFT.uz.kuleuven.ac.be>
References: <DB19C4D58E761B4DBB2D9071171599390156B2DE@SWIFT.uz.kuleuven.ac.be>
Message-ID: <489362A1.1000402@blastwave.org>

Hello Joh

Am 31.7.2008 12:30 Uhr, Johan Gr?goire schrieb:

> gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> 
> The last line worries me. Do I need some kind of root-key installed in 
> order for it to be able to verify the public key of Blastwave? I don?t 
> seem to find anything about this on the website.

This is because you don't have a private key.
You can safely ignore this message.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/

From bwalton at artsci.utoronto.ca  Tue Aug  5 18:33:02 2008
From: bwalton at artsci.utoronto.ca (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:33:02 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] updated ruby packages for testing
Message-ID: <1217953951-sup-864@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca>

Hi All,

I've placed updated packages of ruby, rubytk, rubydocs and rubygems in
/testing.  Is anyone willing to try them out for me?  I'm running them
and they seem ok.  The updated packages bring ruby to current
(1.8.7p22), which addresses the recent vulnerabilities
(http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2008/06/20/arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerabil
ities/).

I have not updated the rake package as I prefer to install gems via the
gem command instead of wrapping them in solaris packages...that being
said, if people prefer a prepackaged rake gem, I'll update it also.

If anyone is interested, there is also a new package for fastcgi in
testing.

Thanks
-Ben

-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080805/0e452cad/attachment.bin 

From ulrich.leodolter at obvsg.at  Wed Aug 27 15:53:10 2008
From: ulrich.leodolter at obvsg.at (Ulrich Leodolter)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:53:10 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] nrpe problem
Message-ID: <1219845190.21500.23.camel@leodolter.bibvb.ac.at>

hello

i like to monitor a solaris 9 sparc server using
nagiosp + nrpe,   i have installed all packages + deps
(thank god for pkg-get,  i am a longtime linux user :-)

 nagiosp 1.4.11,REV=2008.01.05
 nrpe 2.10,REV=2008.01.20

but there is an annoying bug in nrpe version 2.10 
which is fixed in version 2.12


nrpe-2.12/ChangeLog

2.12 - 03/10/2008
-----------------
- Fix for unterminated multiline plugin (garbage) output (Krzysztof
Oledzki)


please upgrade the nrpe package.
thanks

ps: would be also nice if nagiosp are upgraded to 1.4.12

-- 
Ulrich Leodolter <ulrich.leodolter at obvsg.at>
OBVSG


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Aug 27 17:13:00 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:13:00 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
Message-ID: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from blastwave.org?!
where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?

thanks,

gerard

From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Aug 27 17:28:33 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
In-Reply-To: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <382206.81135.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

http://wiki.blastwave.org/bugtracker/


--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> From: Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
> Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
> To: users at lists.opencsw.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 11:13 AM
> hello all,
> i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from
> blastwave.org?!
> where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> gerard
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users


      

From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Aug 27 17:28:53 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
In-Reply-To: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47633.53404.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

http://wiki.blastwave.org/bugtracker/


--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> From: Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
> Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
> To: users at lists.opencsw.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 11:13 AM
> hello all,
> i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from
> blastwave.org?!
> where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> gerard
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users


      

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Aug 27 17:29:32 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:29:32 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
In-Reply-To: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <625385e30808270829w4e8b2dfdy4415cea78fc1d0ea@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
> hello all,
> i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from blastwave.org?!
> where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?

You may not have noticed that there has been a split between Blastwave
and the CSW project. Blastwave will create a new project for Solaris
10+, immediately dropping support for Solaris 8 and 9, they are also
changing a lot of other things. Probably the existing tree of packages
will be frozen.

CSW is now located at http://www.opencsw.org and you can find Mantis
there at http://www.opencsw.org/mantis. The project will still support
Solaris 8 until March 2009 as previously stated.

Both projects have some fixing to do until either is fully operational.

-- 
/peter

From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com  Thu Aug 28 23:17:14 2008
From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:17:14 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
Message-ID: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>

Hello - 

What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions? 

I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org but
now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org. 

Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

Thanks,
Jon Fechner	
jon.fechner at tellabs.com
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
============================================================

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Aug 28 23:22:11 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:22:11 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
References: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Message-ID: <EE905D59-1C77-4142-9047-0D44234D862B@opencsw.org>

Hi Jon,

Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?

You have found the right place :-)

> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org  
> but
> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>
> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Aug 28 23:29:50 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:29:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
References: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Message-ID: <625385e30808281429s673e79b1of70cabf4d917cbe7@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Fechner, Jon L.
<Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com> wrote:
> Hello -
>
> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?
>
> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org but
> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>
> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

OpenCSW will continue the project as you know it so you can ask your
questions here if you want to.

Dennis is starting a new project with different goals/methods so you
can subscribe to his mailing list as well if you want to keep up with
that.

-- 
/peter

From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com  Fri Aug 29 00:02:24 2008
From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:02:24 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <EE905D59-1C77-4142-9047-0D44234D862B@opencsw.org>
References: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
	<EE905D59-1C77-4142-9047-0D44234D862B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275641@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>

Thanks for your response...

We are using the CSW packages on our production Solaris machines so on
the surface it seems to make sense to stick with CSW rather than
Blastwave, yet it is a little sad to see the split.

Anyway, it looks like most of the repositories that were used a month
ago are still available for CSW. It also appears that the Blastwave
(Dennis') project now has a different repository at
http://blastwave.network.com/csw/. 

Is it safe to say then that the CSW repositories and the
blastwave.network.com repository will now begin diverging with separate
maintainers, focus, etc?

Also, do you or anybody else know when we can expect the next stable CSW
release?

Thx as always,
-Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Dagobert Michelsen [mailto:dam at opencsw.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:22 PM
To: questions and discussions
Cc: Fechner, Jon L.
Subject: Re: [csw-users] asking questions

Hi Jon,

Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?

You have found the right place :-)

> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org  
> but
> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>
> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.


Best regards

   -- Dago
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
============================================================

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Fri Aug 29 00:19:11 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:19:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
Message-ID: <51130.10.0.66.17.1219961951.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>


> Hi Jon,
>
> Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
>> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?
>
> You have found the right place :-)
>
>> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org
>> but
>> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>>
>> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
>> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
>> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.
>
> Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
> activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
> for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
> to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
> OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.

No one is authorized to speak on behalf of Blastwave.org Inc. or any
activities by Blastwave.org or products or services distributed by
Blastwave(tm) other than a legal representative for Blastwave.org Inc.

Blastwave is a trademark of Blastwave.org Inc. in both the United
States and Canada.  Blastwave.org Inc. is a registered corporation
which has the primary focus of providing open source software for
Solaris users under the following classifications :

    International Class: 009
    Class Status: Active
    Open source software for computer operating systems
    Basis: 1(a), 44(d)
    First Use Date: 2003-00-00
    First Use in Commerce Date: 2003-00-00

    International Class: 042
    Class Status: Active
    Provision of open source software design and support
                 services for computer operating systems

The information that you are getting from other sources should not be
trusted.

This is official.

Dennis Clarke
CEO Blastwave.org Inc.



From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 29 00:33:51 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:33:51 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <51130.10.0.66.17.1219961951.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>
References: <51130.10.0.66.17.1219961951.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>
Message-ID: <DEEEFA38-0FDA-403B-A9B5-5F4819D6A820@opencsw.org>

Am 29.08.2008 um 00:19 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
>> Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
>>> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org
>>> but
>>> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>>>
>>> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users  
>>> and
>>> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may  
>>> have
>>> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.
>>
>> Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the  
>> Blastwave
>> activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
>> for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
>> to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
>> OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.
>
> No one is authorized to speak on behalf of Blastwave.org Inc. or any
> activities by Blastwave.org or products or services distributed by
> Blastwave(tm) other than a legal representative for Blastwave.org Inc.

You are perfectly right. I'll rephrase:

Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is a trademark of
Blastwave.org Inc.

> Blastwave is a trademark of Blastwave.org Inc. in both the United
> States and Canada.  Blastwave.org Inc. is a registered corporation
> which has the primary focus of providing open source software for
> Solaris users under the following classifications :
>
>     International Class: 009
>     Class Status: Active
>     Open source software for computer operating systems
>     Basis: 1(a), 44(d)
>     First Use Date: 2003-00-00
>     First Use in Commerce Date: 2003-00-00
>
>     International Class: 042
>     Class Status: Active
>     Provision of open source software design and support
>                  services for computer operating systems
>
> The information that you are getting from other sources should not be
> trusted.
>
> This is official.

Jehova!

From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Fri Aug 29 08:50:36 2008
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:50:36 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] bug in pkg-get
Message-ID: <20080829065036.149410@gmx.net>

Hi,

I do not know whether this is a known issue, the bugtracking system requires a login even for read-only
access...

Using CSWpkgget 3.8.4 (hopefully the latest version) I see the following
behaviour:

  $ pwd
  /tmp
  $ cat catalog
  foobar1
  $ cat descriptions
  foobar2
  $ ls -al /var/pkg-get/*example.com
  -rw-r--r--   1 root root 191019 Jun 29 00:00 /var/pkg-get/catalog-example.com
  -rw-r--r--   1 root root  85516 Jun 29 00:00 /var/pkg-get/desc-example.com
  $ pkg-get -l
  WARNING: catalog out of date.
  Automatically updating catalog first
  Getting catalog...
  ...
  Updated description file
  ...
  $ pwd
  /tmp
  $ ls -l
  -rw-r--r--   1 root     root      191019 Aug 29 08:16 catalog
  -rw-r--r--   1 root     root       85516 Aug 29 08:16 descriptions.1
  $ cat catalog
  9menu 1.8,REV=2006.05.19 CSW9menu ...
  a2ps 4.13b CSWa2ps a2ps-4.13b-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ...
  aalib 1.4.0,REV=2004.10.15_rev=rc5 CSWaalib ...
  ...
  $ cat descriptions.1
  9menu - A utility providing simple menus under X11
  a2ps - Any to PostScript filter
  aalib - Ascii art graphics library
  ...
  $ cat /var/pkg-get/desc-example.com
  foobar2

pkg-get destroys existing files "catalog" and "descriptions" in the
current directory when performing implicit updates of the catalog.

It removes "./catalog", loads a new file "catalog"  from the update-server
to the current directory and puts its content into
/var/pkg-get/catalog-example.com, leaving the new catalog file behind.

For "descriptions", it loads the current version from the update-server
to whatever name wget decides to use and moves the file "./descriptions"
to /var/pkg-get/desc-example.com.
This looks seriously wrong.

I suggest to use /usr/bin/mktemp which is included in the meta clusters
SUNWCmreq and up (checked for Solaris 9 and 10) and make sure  that
pkg-get only writes to /var/pkg-get and not to the current directory.

ciao
     Klaus

-- 
Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen?
Der Eine f?r Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 30 02:21:48 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:21:48 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] bug in pkg-get
In-Reply-To: <20080829065036.149410@gmx.net>
References: <20080829065036.149410@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <625385e30808291721x3df19319v1510f89151db3800@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Klaus Heinz <khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de> wrote:
> pkg-get destroys existing files "catalog" and "descriptions" in the
> current directory when performing implicit updates of the catalog.

I've also noted that it leaves catalog files all over the place. Even
worse if one had files named catalog and descriptions in the current
directory of course.

-- 
/peter

From ihsan at blastwave.org  Fri Aug  1 21:23:13 2008
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:23:13 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Question about setting up digital signature
 checking in	Blastwave
In-Reply-To: <DB19C4D58E761B4DBB2D9071171599390156B2DE@SWIFT.uz.kuleuven.ac.be>
References: <DB19C4D58E761B4DBB2D9071171599390156B2DE@SWIFT.uz.kuleuven.ac.be>
Message-ID: <489362A1.1000402@blastwave.org>

Hello Joh

Am 31.7.2008 12:30 Uhr, Johan Gr?goire schrieb:

> gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> 
> The last line worries me. Do I need some kind of root-key installed in 
> order for it to be able to verify the public key of Blastwave? I don?t 
> seem to find anything about this on the website.

This is because you don't have a private key.
You can safely ignore this message.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From bwalton at artsci.utoronto.ca  Tue Aug  5 18:33:02 2008
From: bwalton at artsci.utoronto.ca (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:33:02 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] updated ruby packages for testing
Message-ID: <1217953951-sup-864@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca>

Hi All,

I've placed updated packages of ruby, rubytk, rubydocs and rubygems in
/testing.  Is anyone willing to try them out for me?  I'm running them
and they seem ok.  The updated packages bring ruby to current
(1.8.7p22), which addresses the recent vulnerabilities
(http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2008/06/20/arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerabil
ities/).

I have not updated the rake package as I prefer to install gems via the
gem command instead of wrapping them in solaris packages...that being
said, if people prefer a prepackaged rake gem, I'll update it also.

If anyone is interested, there is also a new package for fastcgi in
testing.

Thanks
-Ben

-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080805/0e452cad/attachment.asc>

From ulrich.leodolter at obvsg.at  Wed Aug 27 15:53:10 2008
From: ulrich.leodolter at obvsg.at (Ulrich Leodolter)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:53:10 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] nrpe problem
Message-ID: <1219845190.21500.23.camel@leodolter.bibvb.ac.at>

hello

i like to monitor a solaris 9 sparc server using
nagiosp + nrpe,   i have installed all packages + deps
(thank god for pkg-get,  i am a longtime linux user :-)

 nagiosp 1.4.11,REV=2008.01.05
 nrpe 2.10,REV=2008.01.20

but there is an annoying bug in nrpe version 2.10 
which is fixed in version 2.12


nrpe-2.12/ChangeLog

2.12 - 03/10/2008
-----------------
- Fix for unterminated multiline plugin (garbage) output (Krzysztof
Oledzki)


please upgrade the nrpe package.
thanks

ps: would be also nice if nagiosp are upgraded to 1.4.12

-- 
Ulrich Leodolter <ulrich.leodolter at obvsg.at>
OBVSG



From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Aug 27 17:13:00 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:13:00 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
Message-ID: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from blastwave.org?!
where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?

thanks,

gerard


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Aug 27 17:28:33 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
In-Reply-To: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <382206.81135.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

http://wiki.blastwave.org/bugtracker/


--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> From: Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
> Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
> To: users at lists.opencsw.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 11:13 AM
> hello all,
> i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from
> blastwave.org?!
> where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> gerard
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users


      


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Aug 27 17:28:53 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
In-Reply-To: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47633.53404.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

http://wiki.blastwave.org/bugtracker/


--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> From: Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
> Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
> To: users at lists.opencsw.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 11:13 AM
> hello all,
> i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from
> blastwave.org?!
> where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> gerard
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users


      


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Aug 27 17:29:32 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:29:32 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] where is mantis?
In-Reply-To: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <48B56EFC.3070905@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <625385e30808270829w4e8b2dfdy4415cea78fc1d0ea@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
> hello all,
> i'm surprised that mantis has disappeared from blastwave.org?!
> where is http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/main_page.php?

You may not have noticed that there has been a split between Blastwave
and the CSW project. Blastwave will create a new project for Solaris
10+, immediately dropping support for Solaris 8 and 9, they are also
changing a lot of other things. Probably the existing tree of packages
will be frozen.

CSW is now located at http://www.opencsw.org and you can find Mantis
there at http://www.opencsw.org/mantis. The project will still support
Solaris 8 until March 2009 as previously stated.

Both projects have some fixing to do until either is fully operational.

-- 
/peter


From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com  Thu Aug 28 23:17:14 2008
From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:17:14 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
Message-ID: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>

Hello - 

What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions? 

I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org but
now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org. 

Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

Thanks,
Jon Fechner	
jon.fechner at tellabs.com
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
============================================================


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Aug 28 23:22:11 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:22:11 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
References: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Message-ID: <EE905D59-1C77-4142-9047-0D44234D862B@opencsw.org>

Hi Jon,

Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?

You have found the right place :-)

> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org  
> but
> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>
> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Aug 28 23:29:50 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:29:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
References: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
Message-ID: <625385e30808281429s673e79b1of70cabf4d917cbe7@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Fechner, Jon L.
<Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com> wrote:
> Hello -
>
> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?
>
> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org but
> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>
> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

OpenCSW will continue the project as you know it so you can ask your
questions here if you want to.

Dennis is starting a new project with different goals/methods so you
can subscribe to his mailing list as well if you want to keep up with
that.

-- 
/peter


From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com  Fri Aug 29 00:02:24 2008
From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:02:24 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <EE905D59-1C77-4142-9047-0D44234D862B@opencsw.org>
References: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275627@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
	<EE905D59-1C77-4142-9047-0D44234D862B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <E167ED46776D284B893BE52E888B69BC0B275641@USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>

Thanks for your response...

We are using the CSW packages on our production Solaris machines so on
the surface it seems to make sense to stick with CSW rather than
Blastwave, yet it is a little sad to see the split.

Anyway, it looks like most of the repositories that were used a month
ago are still available for CSW. It also appears that the Blastwave
(Dennis') project now has a different repository at
http://blastwave.network.com/csw/. 

Is it safe to say then that the CSW repositories and the
blastwave.network.com repository will now begin diverging with separate
maintainers, focus, etc?

Also, do you or anybody else know when we can expect the next stable CSW
release?

Thx as always,
-Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Dagobert Michelsen [mailto:dam at opencsw.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:22 PM
To: questions and discussions
Cc: Fechner, Jon L.
Subject: Re: [csw-users] asking questions

Hi Jon,

Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?

You have found the right place :-)

> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org  
> but
> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>
> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.

Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.


Best regards

   -- Dago
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
============================================================


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Fri Aug 29 00:19:11 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:19:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
Message-ID: <51130.10.0.66.17.1219961951.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>


> Hi Jon,
>
> Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
>> What/where is the correct forum for Blastwave users to ask questions?
>
> You have found the right place :-)
>
>> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org
>> but
>> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>>
>> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users and
>> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may have
>> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.
>
> Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
> activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
> for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
> to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
> OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.

No one is authorized to speak on behalf of Blastwave.org Inc. or any
activities by Blastwave.org or products or services distributed by
Blastwave(tm) other than a legal representative for Blastwave.org Inc.

Blastwave is a trademark of Blastwave.org Inc. in both the United
States and Canada.  Blastwave.org Inc. is a registered corporation
which has the primary focus of providing open source software for
Solaris users under the following classifications :

    International Class: 009
    Class Status: Active
    Open source software for computer operating systems
    Basis: 1(a), 44(d)
    First Use Date: 2003-00-00
    First Use in Commerce Date: 2003-00-00

    International Class: 042
    Class Status: Active
    Provision of open source software design and support
                 services for computer operating systems

The information that you are getting from other sources should not be
trusted.

This is official.

Dennis Clarke
CEO Blastwave.org Inc.




From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 29 00:33:51 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:33:51 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] asking questions
In-Reply-To: <51130.10.0.66.17.1219961951.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>
References: <51130.10.0.66.17.1219961951.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>
Message-ID: <DEEEFA38-0FDA-403B-A9B5-5F4819D6A820@opencsw.org>

Am 29.08.2008 um 00:19 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
>> Am 28.08.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Fechner, Jon L.:
>>> I used to belong to and send questions to users at lists.blastwave.org
>>> but
>>> now I am seeing messages from users at lists.opencsw.org.
>>>
>>> Did the mailing list just migrate to lists.opencsw.org with users  
>>> and
>>> archives intact? It kind of looks like it did. I suppose this may  
>>> have
>>> had to do with the recent split between CSW and Blastwave.
>>
>> Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the  
>> Blastwave
>> activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
>> for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
>> to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is heading toward
>> OpenSolaris and Solaris Express.
>
> No one is authorized to speak on behalf of Blastwave.org Inc. or any
> activities by Blastwave.org or products or services distributed by
> Blastwave(tm) other than a legal representative for Blastwave.org Inc.

You are perfectly right. I'll rephrase:

Yes, that is the reason. The mailserver was independent of the Blastwave
activities and is now used for the OpenCSW project. The main focus
for OpenCSW are the production releases of Solaris (that is Solaris 8
to 10, both Sparc and x86) whereas Blastwave is a trademark of
Blastwave.org Inc.

> Blastwave is a trademark of Blastwave.org Inc. in both the United
> States and Canada.  Blastwave.org Inc. is a registered corporation
> which has the primary focus of providing open source software for
> Solaris users under the following classifications :
>
>     International Class: 009
>     Class Status: Active
>     Open source software for computer operating systems
>     Basis: 1(a), 44(d)
>     First Use Date: 2003-00-00
>     First Use in Commerce Date: 2003-00-00
>
>     International Class: 042
>     Class Status: Active
>     Provision of open source software design and support
>                  services for computer operating systems
>
> The information that you are getting from other sources should not be
> trusted.
>
> This is official.

Jehova!


From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Fri Aug 29 08:50:36 2008
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:50:36 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] bug in pkg-get
Message-ID: <20080829065036.149410@gmx.net>

Hi,

I do not know whether this is a known issue, the bugtracking system requires a login even for read-only
access...

Using CSWpkgget 3.8.4 (hopefully the latest version) I see the following
behaviour:

  $ pwd
  /tmp
  $ cat catalog
  foobar1
  $ cat descriptions
  foobar2
  $ ls -al /var/pkg-get/*example.com
  -rw-r--r--   1 root root 191019 Jun 29 00:00 /var/pkg-get/catalog-example.com
  -rw-r--r--   1 root root  85516 Jun 29 00:00 /var/pkg-get/desc-example.com
  $ pkg-get -l
  WARNING: catalog out of date.
  Automatically updating catalog first
  Getting catalog...
  ...
  Updated description file
  ...
  $ pwd
  /tmp
  $ ls -l
  -rw-r--r--   1 root     root      191019 Aug 29 08:16 catalog
  -rw-r--r--   1 root     root       85516 Aug 29 08:16 descriptions.1
  $ cat catalog
  9menu 1.8,REV=2006.05.19 CSW9menu ...
  a2ps 4.13b CSWa2ps a2ps-4.13b-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ...
  aalib 1.4.0,REV=2004.10.15_rev=rc5 CSWaalib ...
  ...
  $ cat descriptions.1
  9menu - A utility providing simple menus under X11
  a2ps - Any to PostScript filter
  aalib - Ascii art graphics library
  ...
  $ cat /var/pkg-get/desc-example.com
  foobar2

pkg-get destroys existing files "catalog" and "descriptions" in the
current directory when performing implicit updates of the catalog.

It removes "./catalog", loads a new file "catalog"  from the update-server
to the current directory and puts its content into
/var/pkg-get/catalog-example.com, leaving the new catalog file behind.

For "descriptions", it loads the current version from the update-server
to whatever name wget decides to use and moves the file "./descriptions"
to /var/pkg-get/desc-example.com.
This looks seriously wrong.

I suggest to use /usr/bin/mktemp which is included in the meta clusters
SUNWCmreq and up (checked for Solaris 9 and 10) and make sure  that
pkg-get only writes to /var/pkg-get and not to the current directory.

ciao
     Klaus

-- 
Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen?
Der Eine f?r Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 30 02:21:48 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:21:48 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] bug in pkg-get
In-Reply-To: <20080829065036.149410@gmx.net>
References: <20080829065036.149410@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <625385e30808291721x3df19319v1510f89151db3800@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Klaus Heinz <khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de> wrote:
> pkg-get destroys existing files "catalog" and "descriptions" in the
> current directory when performing implicit updates of the catalog.

I've also noted that it leaves catalog files all over the place. Even
worse if one had files named catalog and descriptions in the current
directory of course.

-- 
/peter