From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com  Fri Feb  1 22:05:17 2008
From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:05:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Local Filesystem Repository and CSW pkg-get
Message-ID: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>

Is there any way I can point the CSW version of pkg-get to a local filesystem repository like:

/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i openssh -R /my/local/file/system/repos/unstable

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080201/adb3d69c/attachment.html 

From jeremiah.johnson at gmail.com  Fri Feb  1 22:12:17 2008
From: jeremiah.johnson at gmail.com (Jeremiah Johnson)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:12:17 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Local Filesystem Repository and CSW pkg-get
In-Reply-To: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <701ea59b0802011312x1c31131bo3823e3f4838bf8f5@mail.gmail.com>

If you have it on a local filesystem, why not just setup apache and
host it on your lan so all of your machines can get it with minimal
fuss?

On Feb 1, 2008 3:05 PM, JL Picard <jlpicard15 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any way I can point the CSW version of pkg-get to a local
> filesystem repository like:
>
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i openssh -R /my/local/file/system/repos/unstable
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From chewie at wookimus.net  Fri Feb  1 22:34:35 2008
From: chewie at wookimus.net (Chad Walstrom)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:34:35 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Local Filesystem Repository and CSW pkg-get
In-Reply-To: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl> 
References: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <28950.1201901675@skuld.wookimus.net>

I believe you use file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable...  I
could be wrong.

Chad

From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com  Sat Feb  2 18:18:28 2008
From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:18:28 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] ***SPAM*** RE: Local Filesystem Repository and
	CSW	pkg-get
Message-ID: <BLU127-DAV9A8715C9DC8A43CAF5570C0310@phx.gbl>

Regarding using file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable , since pkg-get uses wget, I just tried:
        wget file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable
and I got a msg like like the following (although you'd think that wget would support this file transfer mechanism)
        file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable : Unsupported scheme.

Regarding setting-up an Apache Solution - That isn't going to work, because this is a first installation on an internal LAN with no other connectivity in the short-term besides what I bring on the DVD.  Secondly, it would probably be better to create an internal FTP site before an Apache server, since it's easier to setup and lockdown

Speaking of DVDs, how does the DVD solution offered by blastwave.org work?




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080202/4ddc9461/attachment.html 

From jeff at cjsa.com  Thu Feb  7 03:29:53 2008
From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:29:53 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Tcl/Tk 8.5.1 now in testing
Message-ID: <JvuK9t.1Mx@cjsa.com>

I have placed new copies of the Tcl and Tk Version 8.5.1 packages in
testing.  I would appreciate hearing about any problems people encounter
using them.

Regards,
-- 
Jeff

Jeffery Small  <jeff at blastwave.org>
In real life:  <jeff at cjsa.com>


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Thu Feb  7 16:14:01 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:14:01 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
Message-ID: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
is it me or is there a problem with evince?
No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.

Thanks,

gerard

From jkwan at jpl.nasa.gov  Thu Feb  7 16:51:45 2008
From: jkwan at jpl.nasa.gov (Joseph Kwan)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:51:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] php5 upgrade and stuff missing from
	no-debug-non-zts-20060613??
Message-ID: <47AB2911.6040601@jpl.nasa.gov>

I was trying to add the php5_gd package and found I had to upgrade 
various other
things, including php5.  When I upgraded that, it seems that I'm now 
missing
all sorts of things in the 
/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613
directory, which ultimately rendered the php5 unusable.

My original CSWphp5:

  PKGINST:  CSWphp5
     NAME:  php5 - PHP Hypertext Processor 5
 CATEGORY:  application
     ARCH:  sparc
  VERSION:  5.2.1,REV=2007.03.15
   VENDOR:  http://www.php.net/downloads.php packaged for CSW by Cory Omand
   PSTAMP:  comand at ra-20070315120756
 INSTDATE:  Oct 29 2007 15:11
  HOTLINE:  http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/
    EMAIL:  comand at blastwave.org
   STATUS:  completely installed
    FILES:      178 installed pathnames
                  6 shared pathnames
                 41 directories
                 27 executables
              33236 blocks used (approx)

And I had the following in 
/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/
bcmath.so      ldap.so        pcntl.so       sockets.so     zip.so
calendar.so    mbstring.so    pdo.so         sysvmsg.so     zlib.so
dom.so         mime_magic.so  session.so     sysvsem.so
exif.so        mysql.so       shmop.so       sysvshm.so
iconv.so       mysqli.so      simplexml.so   xmlreader.so
json.so        openssl.so     soap.so        xmlrpc.so

After upgrading to:

  PKGINST:  CSWphp5
     NAME:  php5 - PHP Hypertext Processor 5
 CATEGORY:  application
     ARCH:  sparc
  VERSION:  5.2.4,REV=2007.10.29
   VENDOR:  http://www.php.net/downloads.php packaged for CSW by Cory Omand
   PSTAMP:  comand at ra-20071029120142
 INSTDATE:  Feb 04 2008 10:20
  HOTLINE:  http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/
    EMAIL:  comand at blastwave.org
   STATUS:  completely installed
    FILES:      157 installed pathnames
                  6 shared pathnames
                 41 directories
                  6 executables
              35051 blocks used (approx)

I only had the following in that directory:
gd.so       ldap.so     mysql.so    mysqli.so   openssl.so  session.so

(I added the php5_gd, but didn't touch the php5_session or the other 
packages which
it tells me is the current version).

It seems many of those items I'm missing were in the CSWphp5 package:

grep sysvshm.so /var/sadm/install/contents
/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/sysvshm.so f 
none 0755 root bin 23000 43550 1173974875 CSWphp5

but not in the installation today.

Anyone have any ideas as to what's up with that directory?  
Interestingly enough, I did the
same thing (upgrade php5 to add php5_gd) on January 25th to another 
Solaris 9 system
and it completed without any problems and I have all the stuff in that 
extension directory
as expected.  Unfortunately I didn't save an upgrade log of the process 
so I don't know if
all those pieces from no-debug-non-zts-20060613 where actually in the 
CSWphp5
package.

thanks,

Joe Kwan
jkwan at jpl.nasa.gov


From aaron at ernieball.com  Thu Feb  7 17:35:52 2008
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:35:52 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>

I remember I used to be the one who thought I was crazy cause Evince 
wouldn't print. That about two years ago though and it wasn't the fault 
of Evince but one of it's dependencies. Back then though Evince would 
crash when you would try to print.

That probably got addressed over a year ago now though. Been using 
Evince for awhile now with no problems.

One thing that came to mind is we use Cups for the printing. If you're 
using the default Solaris printing then you might have a problem.
I don't know though. It just seems like a possible reason to me. I don't 
claim to know anything about the inner workings of Evince.

I know when I got to print in Evince it shows all the printers I have in 
my Cups server.

We used to use the Cups that came on the Solaris Companion CD and used 
the instructions on this page to install it and get it running.
http://www.lengers.com/?p=12

Since then we have updated to the CSW version of Cups and pretty much 
followed those instructions but with /opt/csw paths instead of /opt/sfw 
paths.


Aaron


G?rard Henry wrote:
> hello all,
> is it me or is there a problem with evince?
> No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
> When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
> I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.
>
> Thanks,
>
> gerard
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   

From waldirio at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 17:50:50 2008
From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:50:50 -0200
Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: Doubt about two monitors - Solaris 8
In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820802070842g57e9942dt8759e17e8c0c49da@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7df9f1820802070842g57e9942dt8759e17e8c0c49da@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7df9f1820802070850g5aac38aalf08c2e351e0b8d4@mail.gmail.com>

       Friends, good morning

  I sent this email to vnc list (development and supporting), but you know
anythings about this problem ?!


Thanks in advanced.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro <waldirio at gmail.com>
Date: 07/02/2008 14:42
Subject: Doubt about two monitors - Solaris 8
To: vnc-list at realvnc.com


    Hello Friends, good morning

  I would like to ask about two monitors in Solaris 8. I'm trying to capture
the Sparc machine with Solaris 8 by WindowsXP with vnc client. In my
servers, I'm using vnc-4_1_2-sparc_solaris.pkg package (download of
http://www.realvnc.com/products/download.html)

  I prepare the routine below and include in /etc/profile

####################################
cID=`id |cut -d"(" -f2|cut -d")" -f1`
LOCAL=`w |grep $cID|awk '{print $2}'|grep console|wc -l`

if [ $LOCAL -eq 1 ]; then
  PROC_VNC=`ps -ef |grep x0vncserver|sed -e "/grep x0vnc/d"|wc -l`

  if [ $PROC_VNC -ne 1 ]; then
    /apps/vnc/x0vncserver -PasswordFile=/apps/vnc/passwd &
  fi
fi
####################################

This routine check if the user are logged locally, if yes, start x0vncserver
using the password in file /apps/vnc/passwd.

*My problem*.
If I'm using the default configuration in Solaris, when the machine is
captured, only is exibithed the display 0, if I change the Solaris
configuration to xinerama, when capture, the guy can see all display, but
select only the display 0 (the cursor don't go to display 1 or right
screen).

What I can do to fix this problem ?!

Thanks in advanced.
-- 
______________
Regards
Waldirio
msn: wmp at sinope.com.br
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080207/f1f1b697/attachment.html 

From udippel at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 17:36:18 2008
From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:36:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <92bf1a120802070836g2b69fc90g3f2a559972614922@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 7, 2008 10:14 AM, G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
> hello all,
> is it me or is there a problem with evince?
> No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
> When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
> I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.

Okay, yes, though I wonder what SXDE4 is ... :)

There has been some discussion on the opensolaris-lists about this as well.
The problem known is wrong format/100%CPU/no output.
What's your problem?

Uwe

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Thu Feb  7 18:15:26 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:15:26 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <92bf1a120802070836g2b69fc90g3f2a559972614922@mail.gmail.com>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<92bf1a120802070836g2b69fc90g3f2a559972614922@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <47AB3CAE.2040206@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Uwe Dippel a ?crit :
> On Feb 7, 2008 10:14 AM, G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
>> hello all,
>> is it me or is there a problem with evince?
>> No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
>> When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
>> I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.
> 
> Okay, yes, though I wonder what SXDE4 is ... :)
> 
Solaris Express Developper Edition release 4
http://developers.sun.com/sxde/

> There has been some discussion on the opensolaris-lists about this as well.
> The problem known is wrong format/100%CPU/no output.
> What's your problem?
> 
my problem is that no printer is presented

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Thu Feb  7 18:28:20 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:28:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Aaron Wilson a ?crit :
> I remember I used to be the one who thought I was crazy cause Evince 
> wouldn't print. That about two years ago though and it wasn't the fault 
> of Evince but one of it's dependencies. Back then though Evince would 
> crash when you would try to print.
> 
> That probably got addressed over a year ago now though. Been using 
> Evince for awhile now with no problems.
> 
> One thing that came to mind is we use Cups for the printing. If you're 
> using the default Solaris printing then you might have a problem.
> I don't know though. It just seems like a possible reason to me. I don't 
> claim to know anything about the inner workings of Evince.
> 
> I know when I got to print in Evince it shows all the printers I have in 
> my Cups server.
> 
> We used to use the Cups that came on the Solaris Companion CD and used 
> the instructions on this page to install it and get it running.
> http://www.lengers.com/?p=12
> 
> Since then we have updated to the CSW version of Cups and pretty much 
> followed those instructions but with /opt/csw paths instead of /opt/sfw 
> paths.
> 

i don't use cups, just the default solaris printing. But as i've just 
upgraded from S10U4 to SXDE, nom evince is delivered by Sun in /usr/bin 
(package SUNWgnome-pdf-viewer), and it works
here are two screenshots:
- first with csw evince Capture.png
http://www.latp.univ-mrs.fr/~henry/Solaris/Capture.png
- second one with sun evince Capture-1.png
http://www.latp.univ-mrs.fr/~henry/Solaris/Capture-1.png


From aaron at ernieball.com  Thu Feb  7 20:02:41 2008
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:02:41 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>
	<47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47AB55D1.7010201@ernieball.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080207/7993ea42/attachment-0001.html 

From a.cervellin at acm.org  Thu Feb  7 20:09:54 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:09:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB55D1.7010201@ernieball.com>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>	<47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<47AB55D1.7010201@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <47AB5782.8030004@acm.org>

Aaron Wilson wrote:
> I still suspect the Blastwave version was compiled to use Cups and Sun 
> did some work to get the SXDE/opensolaris version to work with the 
> Solaris print spooler. Either that or possibly another CSW package needs 
> to be installed for the Solaris spooler.

yes, evince has been built to use cups

From a.cervellin at acm.org  Sun Feb 10 10:41:56 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:41:56 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing seamonkey 1.1.8
Message-ID: <47AEC6E4.9000309@acm.org>

Seamonkey 1.1.8 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing
This release contains security and stability fixes.

Following is the rough changelog:
185946 filepicker crashes Mozilla on second press of Open/Browse buttons 
on web-pages
197052 crash if modification innerHTML of element in this element [@ 
js_EmitTree ]
279505 Crash in pop-up window on parent.close() due to double free. [@ 
nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent]
283493 flushing of training data during session practically never 
happens due to too high "# of changes" threshold
301291 Forward-inline ignores outgoing-charset preference
310962 Multiple schema types for a node not being processed correctly
312018 Page with "long" title saved as PDF as "Untitled.pdf"
314432 Get rid of TVector glue in Default Plugin on Mac/Intel
314874 Function.call/apply pass thisArg.valueOf() as the this value when 
thisArg is not a primitive value
316817 [newwidget] Output which parses DOM data and displays it
326035 Page Up and Page Down do not hide cursor
342511 correcting another word (with spell checker) doesn't cause 
current word to be spell-checked
343987 [BeOS] Rendering context and other gfx rework
355067 Package OS/2 cairo support library (mzfntcfg.dll) with SVG builds
355333 [IMAP] Crash when moving or deleting messages [@ 
nsImapProtocol::HandleMessageDownLoadLine]
368864 Menu selection is invisible in SeaMonkey 1.1 on Warp 3
372035 Need to prevent inadvertent bookmarking of javascript: and data: URLs
375292 Stray tmprules.dat files created when getting new messages
375344 accessing prototype of DOM objects throws uncatchable error
376976 Crash [@ nsGlobalHistory::IsURLInHistory] null pointer dereference
377808 0x7d ("}") should be disallowed in hostnames
384937 crashes [@ nsFrameManager::Destroy] upon loading page with iframe
387258 plain text txt file viewing capability lost after having 
downloaded a txt file with content-disposition: attachment and 
content-type: plain/text
387591 JS_GetScopeChain asserts because of native functions
388078 Trunk build broken
388976 [1.1] Support conditional actions (i.e. the `if` attribute)
389136 XML errors when application chrome.rdf exists but is read-only
391019 commandline for external protocol handler is mishandled
391028 drawImage with broken PNG draws random memory
391586 bind on an insert changes the in-scope evaluation context
392944 ecma_3/extensions/regress-320854.js FAIL
393057 valid xsd:dateTime values being marked invalid
393416 Insert or delete of one node can trigger xforms-value-changed on 
a separate form control
394023 Insert of attributes not reflected in bound form controls
396179 Cannot insert elements from xforms namespace using origin 
attribute on insert element
398271 Insert with no `nodeset` declaration causes crash
398499 Crash in DispatchEventToHandlers(EventTargetRec*, 
OpaqueEventRef*, HandlerCallRec*
398668 [FIX]Crash [@ JS_GetPrivate] with binding with destructor, 
setting javascript disabled, reloading and going back
400130 CRASH on function days-from-date() with invalid dates (month zero)
402150 Buffer overrun [@ nsDocument::RetrieveRelevantHeaders] at 
provided URL
403052 Relicence moz*TXTToHTMLConv files
403090 [FIX]Found text is no longer highlighted within INPUT text fields 
and TEXTAREAs
403244 crash [@ Tokenizer::tokenizeHeaders]
403250 [10.5] 1.8 build configured with --enable-strip fails: strip: 
symbols referenced by relocation entries that can't be stripped in: 
.../xpinstall/src/libxpinstall.dylib
403258 [10.5] When using an SDK, many configure checks fail
403406 Cursor does not always change to appropriate pointer after using 
scroll buttons/slider.
403989 Cannot save images with SeaMonkey any more
404051 Add .es to IDN TLD whitelist
404264 Junk Mail Controls to stop abnormally when processing email with 
null "from" (sender)
404391 Firefox input and file focus stealing through label
405255 change in-code URLs to new SeaMonkey website
405584 Canvas.drawImage method is not working
405818 [FIX]Opening about:config results in warning about unresponsive 
script
406214 Dialogs with checkbox have focus on checkbox rather than on the 
default button
406314 Add .ir to the IDN whitelist
406555 the decompiler should not depend on JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8
407303 Getting "Unsafe File Type" error when accessing a site that does 
not exist.
407842 Crash with very large font-size (XIOError exit)
408256 Use a constant-size buffer in BMP decoder to reduce fragmentation
408257 script timer not being reset when Microsoft Silverlight plug-in 
fires event callbacks to Javascript.
408755 Update MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH to NSPR_4_6_8_RTM for Leopard build 
compatibility
408935 Can't --disable-xpcom-obsolete in a 1.8 branch static build
409027 transformiix builds with conflicting visibility on 1.8 branch due 
to header name collision
409066 sNativeRegionPool visibility is wrong in libgkgfx
409849 1.8 branch build for ppc with gcc 4.0 fails: 
.../nsCanvasRenderingContext2D.cpp: 1026: error: invalid conversion from 
'int' to 'CGImageAlphaInfo'
410139 Update SeaMonkey's copyright strings to 2008
410320 Crash when deleting mail, if two windows for the mail are opened 
[@  nsMsgMailSession::OnItemEvent]
410456 URL autocomplete shows double entries
410566 Filter ..apps in file picker when searching for helper 
applications on OS/2
411194 XForms testsuite fails
411710 Land bug 384304 on the 1.8 branch for all non-Firefox/SeaMonkey 
products
411960 Build Break: XForms 1.8
413451 Bug 413250 allows to steal data from sessionstore.js
414856 Firefox 2.0.0.12 RC1 breaks Stylish with "TypeError: stylesheet 
has no properties"

From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 10 19:03:06 2008
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:03:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 2.0.0.12 is available
Message-ID: <47AF3C5A.9090105@wbonnet.net>

Hi

Firefox 2.0.0.12 is in testing. I started it successfully on both sparc 
(Sol10u4) and x86 (snv_79). Thanks for your feed backs.

Cheers

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Feb 11 10:42:54 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:42:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
Message-ID: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>

Hi,

Have this problem with file-roller:

% /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or 
directory
Killed

% ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
   find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
        libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)

Anyone else seeing this? Bug?

BR MOL

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Mon Feb 11 10:50:40 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:50:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <47B01A70.6050003@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Mats Larsson a ?crit :
> Hi,
> 
> Have this problem with file-roller:
> 
> % /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
> ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or 
> directory
> Killed
> 
> % ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
>    find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
>         libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)
> 

ultra20-henry% ldd /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
...
         libm.so.2 =>     /lib/libm.so.2
ultra20-henry% pkgchk -l -p /lib/libm.so.2
     REMARQUE : impossible de verrouiller la base de donn?es de modules.
Pathname: /lib/libm.so.2
Type: regular file
Expected mode: 0755
Expected owner: root
Expected group: bin
Expected file size (bytes): 317128
Expected sum(1) of contents: 39809
Expected last modification: nov. 30 02:25:07 2007
Referenced by the following packages:
         SUNWlibmsr
Current status: installed

do you have this package installed?

gerard

From james at blastwave.org  Mon Feb 11 10:56:17 2008
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:56:17 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 11/02/08, 09:42:54, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote 
regarding [csw-users] file-roller problem:

> Have this problem with file-roller:

> % /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
> ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or
> directory
> Killed

> % ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
>    find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
>         libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)


Complaint upheld.  The problem is CSWlibart.  It is built for
Solaris 10, hence looks for libm.so.2 not libm.so.1.

Please file a "crash" bug for CSWlibart.



James.



From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Feb 11 10:59:12 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:59:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <47B01A70.6050003@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com> <47B01A70.6050003@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47B01C70.6080402@ericsson.com>

On 2008-02-11 10:50, G?rard Henry wrote:
> Mats Larsson a ?crit :
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have this problem with file-roller:
>>     
Sorry but did forget to mention I only see it in Solaris 8 and 9. Not in 
10 and Nevada.
>> % /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
>> ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or 
>> directory
>> Killed
>>
>> % ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
>>    find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
>>         libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)
>>
>>     
>
> ultra20-henry% ldd /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
> ...
>          libm.so.2 =>     /lib/libm.so.2
> ultra20-henry% pkgchk -l -p /lib/libm.so.2
>      REMARQUE : impossible de verrouiller la base de donn?es de modules.
> Pathname: /lib/libm.so.2
> Type: regular file
> Expected mode: 0755
> Expected owner: root
> Expected group: bin
> Expected file size (bytes): 317128
> Expected sum(1) of contents: 39809
> Expected last modification: nov. 30 02:25:07 2007
> Referenced by the following packages:
>          SUNWlibmsr
> Current status: installed
>
> do you have this package installed?
Yes in Solaris 10, not in 8 and 9.

/MOL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080211/1413745d/attachment-0001.html 

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Feb 11 11:01:43 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:01:43 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
	<20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <47B01D07.1080500@ericsson.com>

On 2008-02-11 10:56, James Lee wrote:
> Please file a "crash" bug for CSWlibart.
Did suspect it. Will file a crash bug.


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Feb 13 14:40:40 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:40:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <5222AA44-E506-477F-91AC-6892E4B8D0F9@blastwave.org>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
	<20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<47B01D07.1080500@ericsson.com>
	<5222AA44-E506-477F-91AC-6892E4B8D0F9@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <47B2F358.5050004@ericsson.com>

On 2008-02-13 13:54, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Although the crash bug is not there: I have versions with binding
Now it's there ;)
> to libm.so.1 in testing/:
>   
> <http://www.blastwave.org/testing/libart-2.3.19,REV=2008.02.13-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz> 
>
>   
> <http://www.blastwave.org/testing/libart-2.3.19,REV=2008.02.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz> 
>
> Please provide feedback soon so I can push out the bugfix ASAP. 
And now it's tested (sparc version) and at least file-roller works like 
a charm.

BR MOL

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 14 06:22:24 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:22:24 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] can I remove a blastwave package?
In-Reply-To: <47B3C88F.1090909@shaw.ca>
References: <cff69c294833.47b35359@shaw.ca>
	<3427.72.39.216.186.1202961576.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<47B3C88F.1090909@shaw.ca>
Message-ID: <4312.72.39.216.186.1202966544.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> I'm guilty. I'm a total newbie. I'm in way over my head. I don't know
> how to admin a SVR4 package in Solaris. Thanks for the tip. I'll read up
> on that.

Let's just get past all that and solve the problem the old fashioned way.
Sorry for being crisp but I never did understand why someone would drop a
pile of logs on a total stranger and then say "fix it". So I had to push
back a little.

That gets us to here.

> I followed the steps on that URL to install the package:
>
> http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/samp_setup.jsp

Right. Been there .. done that and got the t-shirt too.

At this point I am going to forward this email into the users mailist at
blastwave.org and get people involved. I am going to do this because the
guys that know MySQL back to front and in their sleep hang out there and I
know that they will see this and possibly attack it with hammers and a fine
tooth comb.  Also, the guys inside Blastwave know that I am up to my ears
fixing a subversion server problem and I can't stop and play right now.

Let's get some other people involved mmmkay ?

Personally I think you are doing fine .. but something has clearly run amok.

pardon me while I drop kick this into the users mailist here :

    users at lists.blastwave.org

Where I will receive it again.

Dennis

---------- rest of original message -------------

> I installed Solaris 10, set up software raid, configured a static IP,
> followed the steps to get started with Blastwave;
>
> 0 - got patched
> 1 - Installed pkg-get
> 2 - Edited the pkg-get file, digested the md5 sums - The default site is
> now set to url=http://mirror.unixheads.com/csw. The secondary is
> url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable
> 3 - Installed wget
> 4 - copied admin-fullauto to admin
> 5 - set the path and supath
> 6 - configured apache
> 7 - typed the following:
>
> # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i mysql5 mysql5client mysql5devel mysql5rt
> # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i mysql5test
>
> 8 - Watched the sparks fly.
>
> I had MySQL 4, the one that comes with Solaris 10 installed, tested and
> working previously, but I removed the links to it in the rcX.d
> directories. I put them there in the first place, so I'm pretty sure I
> didn't break anything by removing them. Then I rebooted before trying to
> start version 5.
>
> I added the group and user just like the sun website said to, then
> initialized the database, again like the sun website said to, then
> started MySQL with the command they gave, saw that MySQL was running,
> pkilled MySQL, then used the svcadm command to make sure it starts on boot.
>
>
> Mark
>
>
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I'll skip the pile of logs and just ask the important questions :
>>
>>   1) do you know how to admin SVR4 packages on Solaris ?
>>
>>   2) how did you install this MySQL package ?
>>
>>   Because that package is solid as a rock and if you installed it
>> correctly
>> then you would not have a problem. I can tell by your question "do I just
>> delete the directory?" that you do not know how to admin the system. If
>> you just delete the directory then you will corrupt the package database
>> on the machine.
>>
>> So .. how did you install it ?
>>
>> Dennis

From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Fri Feb 15 09:23:38 2008
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:23:38 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] bad mix of GNU tar and amanda
Message-ID: <20080215082338.7590@gmx.net>

Hi,

the current version of gtar in the blastwave repository is 1.15.91.
According to

  http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/FAQ:What_versions_of_GNU_Tar_are_Amanda-compatible%3F

this is a bad fit for Amanda version 2.4.4p4 from blastwave.

Discussions starting here

  http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/1/8276.html
  http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/2/10184.html
  http://forums.zmanda.com/archive/index.php/t-299.html

confirm my own experience. A backup server with CSWgtar 1.15.1,REV=2006.01.03 worked but a new server with 1.15.91,REV=2006.07.26
does not and shows the error
  sendsize[21716]: time 39057.097: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Unexpected field value in snapshot file
  sendsize[21716]: time 39057.111: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now

in /tmp/amanda/

The corresponding amanda packages were 2.4.4p4,REV=2005.08.05 (old server)
and 2.4.4p4,REV=2006.01.10.x86only (new server).

ciao
     Klaus
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh?rt?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger

From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com  Fri Feb 15 14:43:59 2008
From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:43:59 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] bad mix of GNU tar and amanda
In-Reply-To: <20080215082338.7590@gmx.net>
References: <20080215082338.7590@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <47B5971F.4020608@cognigencorp.com>

Klaus,

Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I use ufsdump on for my
Solaris systems and have never run across this on my Linux systems which
are using GNU tar. I was planning on updating AMANDA really soon per a
request so expect something in /testing soon.


Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the current version of gtar in the blastwave repository is 1.15.91.
> According to
> 
>   http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/FAQ:What_versions_of_GNU_Tar_are_Amanda-compatible%3F
> 
> this is a bad fit for Amanda version 2.4.4p4 from blastwave.
> 
> Discussions starting here
> 
>   http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/1/8276.html
>   http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/2/10184.html
>   http://forums.zmanda.com/archive/index.php/t-299.html
> 
> confirm my own experience. A backup server with CSWgtar 1.15.1,REV=2006.01.03 worked but a new server with 1.15.91,REV=2006.07.26
> does not and shows the error
>   sendsize[21716]: time 39057.097: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Unexpected field value in snapshot file
>   sendsize[21716]: time 39057.111: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> 
> in /tmp/amanda/
> 
> The corresponding amanda packages were 2.4.4p4,REV=2005.08.05 (old server)
> and 2.4.4p4,REV=2006.01.10.x86only (new server).
> 
> ciao
>      Klaus

-- 
Darin Perusich
Unix Systems Administrator
Cognigen Corporation
395 Youngs Rd.
Williamsville, NY 14221
Phone: 716-633-3463
Email: darinper at cognigencorp.com

From pjama at optusnet.com.au  Sun Feb 17 04:04:54 2008
From: pjama at optusnet.com.au (pjama)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:54 +1000
Subject: [csw-users] problems with cups
Message-ID: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>

My system consists of Solaris 10 on a blade 1000, printing to a Canon bubble jet hanging off a HP jet direct print server. All blastwave packages are current (Feb 17, 2008).

I've been using CSW's cups for years but recently had a problem printing multi page docs. My printing needs are small so I'm not sure how long the problem has existed as I usually print one or two pages with no problems. It's 3 or more that are a problem. What happens is that one or two pages comes through OK but the third (and sometimes the second) stops printing half way through and there it hangs. The print job remains in the cups queue until everything is cleared and reset.

I've had a similar problem a few years ago and it was determined by someone on the list to be libgcrypt using the wrong /dev/random ... or something like that. I'm not sure how libgcrypt was determined to be the problem but a new/updated version certainly fixed it.

I have the current version of libgcrypt (1.4.0, circa 20071213) but can't roll back to test as I don't have a previous version.

Does anyone else have a similar problem or any idea how to fix it.

Thanks in advance.
Peter Arnold

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sun Feb 17 04:26:54 2008
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:26:54 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] problems with cups
In-Reply-To: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>
References: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>
Message-ID: <20080216212655.0000395f@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:54 +1000
pjama <pjama at optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> I have the current version of libgcrypt (1.4.0, circa 20071213) but
> can't roll back to test as I don't have a previous version.
> 

If you want to try a previous version, a link to an archive of older
packages is on the Mirrors page.  Here is the link:
http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/

Go to your architecture and 5.8

Alex


-- 

From pjama at optusnet.com.au  Sun Feb 17 11:00:38 2008
From: pjama at optusnet.com.au (pjama)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:00:38 +1000
Subject: [csw-users] problems with cups
In-Reply-To: <20080216212655.0000395f@sws602.mcsun.local>
References: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>
	<20080216212655.0000395f@sws602.mcsun.local>
Message-ID: <47B805C6.5070207@optusnet.com.au>

Thanks Alex, got the two previous versions 1.2.4 and 1.2.3, neither of which seem to solve the problem... sigh. Not sure where to go from here.

Cheers
Peter Arnold

Alex Moore wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:54 +1000
> pjama <pjama at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> 
>> I have the current version of libgcrypt (1.4.0, circa 20071213) but
>> can't roll back to test as I don't have a previous version.
>>
> 
> If you want to try a previous version, a link to an archive of older
> packages is on the Mirrors page.  Here is the link:
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/
> 
> Go to your architecture and 5.8
> 
> Alex
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


From udippel at gmail.com  Mon Feb 18 14:45:53 2008
From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:45:53 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] gupdatedb fails
Message-ID: <92bf1a120802180545y50efc560of0ab41aa7766fa6c@mail.gmail.com>

... agreed, I have many files in a subdirectory, but sufficient space,
around 340MB of RAM, plus some 2GB of swap.

# gupdatedb
sort: insufficient memory; use -S option to increase allocation
Broken Pipe

Uwe

From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 17:49:00 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:49:00 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
Message-ID: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>

I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started 
experimenting with Blastwave.

I have a couple questions:

Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it 
installs a package, and if so, where it is located.

Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed 
using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?


Thanks!



                                 Douglas






Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 21 17:55:51 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:55:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started
> experimenting with Blastwave.
>
> I have a couple questions:
>
> Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it
> installs a package, and if so, where it is located.

The software is all compliant with the well established SVR4 UNIX standards
and therefore it works very well with full file logging. Every file or
directory touched or created is logged into /var/sadm/install/contents along
with all files in the entire system.

So you may not be hapy with trying to read that file. It is large and very
very detailed.

For any given package you can use the standard software tracking tools built
into Solaris.  Try the following to see a really detailed report on what is
in a given package :

pkgchk -l CSWfoo

That may be overwhelming also.

So try this :

pkgchk -l CSWfoo | grep Pathname | cut -f2 -d\:

> Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed
> using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?

Again, the standard tools here are your friend.  Please learn the standards
because they will always work.  Use pkgrm CSWfoo to remove any package
cleanly. Be careful because pkgrm will also remove any package in the
machine if you ask it too.

Dennis


From a.cervellin at acm.org  Thu Feb 21 18:03:14 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:03:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <47BDAED2.3000305@acm.org>

Douglas S. Davis wrote:
> I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started 
> experimenting with Blastwave.
> 
> I have a couple questions:
> 
> Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it 
> installs a package, and if so, where it is located.

Blastwave's pkg-get is just a wrapper on Solaris' pkgadd tool, so 
there's not a specific log file.
you can take a look at system files located under /var/sadm/...

> Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed 
> using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?

"pkg-get -r packagename", which is the same of "pkgrm packagename".
there's no way to recursively delete all the dependencies of a package 
you are removing.

From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 18:04:21 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:04:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org
 >
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Dennis,

Thank you so much for your answer.  I'll look into all of the things 
you suggested.

Obviously, I'm far from a Unix wiz!



                                         Douglas








At 11:55 AM 2/21/2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:

> > I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started
> > experimenting with Blastwave.
> >
> > I have a couple questions:
> >
> > Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it
> > installs a package, and if so, where it is located.
>
>The software is all compliant with the well established SVR4 UNIX standards
>and therefore it works very well with full file logging. Every file or
>directory touched or created is logged into /var/sadm/install/contents along
>with all files in the entire system.
>
>So you may not be hapy with trying to read that file. It is large and very
>very detailed.
>
>For any given package you can use the standard software tracking tools built
>into Solaris.  Try the following to see a really detailed report on what is
>in a given package :
>
>pkgchk -l CSWfoo
>
>That may be overwhelming also.
>
>So try this :
>
>pkgchk -l CSWfoo | grep Pathname | cut -f2 -d\:
>
> > Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed
> > using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?
>
>Again, the standard tools here are your friend.  Please learn the standards
>because they will always work.  Use pkgrm CSWfoo to remove any package
>cleanly. Be careful because pkgrm will also remove any package in the
>machine if you ask it too.
>
>Dennis
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 21 18:11:20 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:11:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Dennis,
>
> Thank you so much for your answer.  I'll look into all of the things
> you suggested.
>
> Obviously, I'm far from a Unix wiz!
>

  you are in the right place and asking the right questions.

  that is the best thing you can do.

So feel free to ask anything and we will try to help.

Dennis


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 21:53:59 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:53:59 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Safe to let pkg-get -u Upgrade pkg-get?
In-Reply-To: <61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org
 >
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>

So I'm trying to install ImageMagick on Solaris 10 using Blastwave.

I run pkg-get to install it, and it tells me I need to upgrade some 
png app or something.  I run the command it recommends, and in the 
process of upgrading various packages, it tells me that pkg-get 
itself needs to be upgraded. Is it safe to let it upgrade itself?  Or 
when I say "yes" that it's okay to uninstall it (prior to it 
installing the latest version), will it no longer be able to upgrade 
itself (as it's been removed)?

Hope that's clear.


For the record, I told it "no" and it continued with other upgrades, 
but if it's safe to do, I'll run it again.




                                                         Douglas












Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 21 22:05:35 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:05:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Safe to let pkg-get -u Upgrade pkg-get?
In-Reply-To: <200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> So I'm trying to install ImageMagick on Solaris 10 using Blastwave.
>
> I run pkg-get to install it, and it tells me I need to upgrade some
> png app or something.  I run the command it recommends, and in the
> process of upgrading various packages, it tells me that pkg-get
> itself needs to be upgraded. Is it safe to let it upgrade itself?  Or
> when I say "yes" that it's okay to uninstall it (prior to it
> installing the latest version), will it no longer be able to upgrade
> itself (as it's been removed)?
>
> Hope that's clear.
>
>
> For the record, I told it "no" and it continued with other upgrades,
> but if it's safe to do, I'll run it again.
>

Well the answer is yes and no.

There was a problem with earlier versions on pkg-get in that they may remove
wget from under itself and then we are stuck not able to upgrade. On Solaris
10 you should not have the problem because there is generally a copy of wget
in /usr/sfw/bin and pkg-get is mighty cunning at looking around for things
like that. :-)

The absolute safe thing to do is something like this :

cd /tmp
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -d pkg_get
pkgrm CSWpkgget
pkgadd -d ./pkg_get-3.8.4-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg

Now you have the latest ... life is good.

Dennis


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 22:59:18 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:59:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Safe to let pkg-get -u Upgrade pkg-get?
In-Reply-To: <1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Thanks, Dennis.

I did as you said, and it went perfectly.

I then ran the pkg-get -u again, and it said wget needed upgrading, 
so I did the same steps you described for wget, and it worked fine, 
too.  (I *did* first have to gunzip the wget package, though).  Would 
it have been safe to let "pkg-get -u" upgrade wget?  Or could it have 
caused a problem, too?

Thanks!




                         Douglas







At 04:05 PM 2/21/2008, you wrote:

> > So I'm trying to install ImageMagick on Solaris 10 using Blastwave.
> >
> > I run pkg-get to install it, and it tells me I need to upgrade some
> > png app or something.  I run the command it recommends, and in the
> > process of upgrading various packages, it tells me that pkg-get
> > itself needs to be upgraded. Is it safe to let it upgrade itself?  Or
> > when I say "yes" that it's okay to uninstall it (prior to it
> > installing the latest version), will it no longer be able to upgrade
> > itself (as it's been removed)?
> >
> > Hope that's clear.
> >
> >
> > For the record, I told it "no" and it continued with other upgrades,
> > but if it's safe to do, I'll run it again.
> >
>
>Well the answer is yes and no.
>
>There was a problem with earlier versions on pkg-get in that they may remove
>wget from under itself and then we are stuck not able to upgrade. On Solaris
>10 you should not have the problem because there is generally a copy of wget
>in /usr/sfw/bin and pkg-get is mighty cunning at looking around for things
>like that. :-)
>
>The absolute safe thing to do is something like this :
>
>cd /tmp
>/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U
>/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -d pkg_get
>pkgrm CSWpkgget
>pkgadd -d ./pkg_get-3.8.4-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg
>
>Now you have the latest ... life is good.
>
>Dennis
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Tue Feb 26 20:24:48 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:24:48 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Hi,

Thanks, again, to all for the help with my basic Blastwave questions 
the other day.  Here are a couple more:


I'm trying to get Zen Cart working on our Solaris 10 web server which 
runs Apache 2.0.58.

When I run the Zen Cart installer, it gives me the following screen:

http://people.haverford.edu/auser/zen.jpg


It shows two important things: that MySQL support is not enabled, and 
that the PHP version is 5.1.4.


Working with some others here, we believe the cause of the MySQL 
support not being enabled is that PHP was installed previously 
without support for MySQL.

I had hoped to install a newer version of PHP with MySQL support, so 
I installed the php5 package from Blastwave.  The installation seemed 
to go fine, and I stopped and then restarted Apache, but when I look 
at that Zen Cart installer screen, it is still showing the old version of PHP.

What do I need to do to get Apache to use the latest install of PHP 
(the Blastwave install)?

The httpd.conf file is pointing to "modules/libphp5.so" and that file 
is the same as it was before I ran the Blastwave installer (the 
Blastwave install).  Should it be a different file?  Or would that 
file not need to be updated?  I did a "find" for libphp5.so, and 
there is only the one version of it.

Obviously, I only expect help with the Blastwave portion of this 
problem, but if anyone has thoughts on the other issues that are a 
part of it, feel free to weigh in.  :-)


Maybe I'll tell you about my ImageMagick problem sometime, since I 
installed that from Blastwave, too, and have some problems there, as 
well.  I'll save that for later, though.  :-)




                                                 Douglas







Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Tue Feb 26 21:36:27 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:36:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Gnome random freezes
Message-ID: <20080226213627.76af39ec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>


I just installed Blastwave/unstable gnome on a Solaris 10 x86 Sunray 
server and we experience the random hangs/freezes already 
discussed on this list, e.g., in
<http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2007-December/003109.html>

I tried to install gtk2-2.10.14 from blastwave/testing 
but this breaks (at least) evince. Evince  complains about unresolved
symbols. 
Is there anything else I can do? Does it make sense to try my luck 
with the gtk2-2.12.8 package from testing?

Best regards, Meik

-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund

From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Tue Feb 26 22:53:11 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:53:11 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <200802262151.m1QLpawq008758@smtp2.haverford.edu>

As a follow-up to my last message about trying to get PHP5 installed 
with Apache, I renamed the libphp5.so file to libphp5.so.OLD, then 
commented out all references to PHP in the httpd.conf file.  I 
stopped apache, then restarted it.

I did a pkgrm for CSWphp5, then did a pkg-get for it.  It installed, 
but doesn't create a new libphp5.so file.  Is it supposed to?

In looking at the PHP info from the Zen Cart installer (I included a 
partial screen cap in my last post), I see that the version of PHP it 
is showing is 5.1.4, but the paths to various PHP files is listed as 
the csw path (the Blastwave location), so I'm not sure what I need to 
change to get Apache/Zen Cart to recognize the 5.2.4 version of PHP 
that I installed from Blastwave.

Thanks for any help you can provide.



                                 Douglas








At 02:24 PM 2/26/2008, Douglas S. Davis wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks, again, to all for the help with my basic Blastwave questions
>the other day.  Here are a couple more:
>
>
>I'm trying to get Zen Cart working on our Solaris 10 web server which
>runs Apache 2.0.58.
>
>When I run the Zen Cart installer, it gives me the following screen:
>
>http://people.haverford.edu/auser/zen.jpg
>
>
>It shows two important things: that MySQL support is not enabled, and
>that the PHP version is 5.1.4.
>
>
>Working with some others here, we believe the cause of the MySQL
>support not being enabled is that PHP was installed previously
>without support for MySQL.
>
>I had hoped to install a newer version of PHP with MySQL support, so
>I installed the php5 package from Blastwave.  The installation seemed
>to go fine, and I stopped and then restarted Apache, but when I look
>at that Zen Cart installer screen, it is still showing the old version of PHP.
>
>What do I need to do to get Apache to use the latest install of PHP
>(the Blastwave install)?
>
>The httpd.conf file is pointing to "modules/libphp5.so" and that file
>is the same as it was before I ran the Blastwave installer (the
>Blastwave install).  Should it be a different file?  Or would that
>file not need to be updated?  I did a "find" for libphp5.so, and
>there is only the one version of it.
>
>Obviously, I only expect help with the Blastwave portion of this
>problem, but if anyone has thoughts on the other issues that are a
>part of it, feel free to weigh in.  :-)
>
>
>Maybe I'll tell you about my ImageMagick problem sometime, since I
>installed that from Blastwave, too, and have some problems there, as
>well.  I'll save that for later, though.  :-)
>
>
>
>
>                                                  Douglas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Douglas S. Davis
>Programmer/Analyst
>Haverford College
>Administrative Computing
>College Information Resources
>370 Lancaster Ave.
>Haverford, PA 19041
>610-896-4206
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From comand at blastwave.org  Tue Feb 26 23:23:13 2008
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:23:13 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802262151.m1QLpawq008758@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802262151.m1QLpawq008758@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70802261423td2050c8lc41ea39f3bbefc0f@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Douglas S. Davis <dsdavis at haverford.edu> wrote:
> As a follow-up to my last message about trying to get PHP5 installed
>  with Apache, I renamed the libphp5.so file to libphp5.so.OLD, then
>  commented out all references to PHP in the httpd.conf file.  I
>  stopped apache, then restarted it.
>
>  I did a pkgrm for CSWphp5, then did a pkg-get for it.  It installed,
>  but doesn't create a new libphp5.so file.  Is it supposed to?

IIRC, it won't recreate files that Solaris believes to be already
installed.  The file to check when you want to reconfigure your
modules is /opt/csw/php5/lib/php.ini.

- C.

From magrawal at coba.usf.edu  Wed Feb 27 02:27:56 2008
From: magrawal at coba.usf.edu (Agrawal, Manish)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:27:56 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu><61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu><61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu><1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <AC6230A5F7852248946CFC481739A95E05EAFB17@tiki.fastmail.usf.edu>

Well, you also need to install 2 additional packages to complete the
SAMP stack - php_mysql5 and ap2_modphp (the package names may be
different, but you get the idea). These packages seem to link the
components together

Manish

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces+magrawal=coba.usf.edu at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces+magrawal=coba.usf.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On
Behalf Of Douglas S. Davis
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:25 PM
To: questions and discussions
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?

Hi,

Thanks, again, to all for the help with my basic Blastwave questions 
the other day.  Here are a couple more:


I'm trying to get Zen Cart working on our Solaris 10 web server which 
runs Apache 2.0.58.

When I run the Zen Cart installer, it gives me the following screen:

http://people.haverford.edu/auser/zen.jpg


It shows two important things: that MySQL support is not enabled, and 
that the PHP version is 5.1.4.


Working with some others here, we believe the cause of the MySQL 
support not being enabled is that PHP was installed previously 
without support for MySQL.

I had hoped to install a newer version of PHP with MySQL support, so 
I installed the php5 package from Blastwave.  The installation seemed 
to go fine, and I stopped and then restarted Apache, but when I look 
at that Zen Cart installer screen, it is still showing the old version
of PHP.

What do I need to do to get Apache to use the latest install of PHP 
(the Blastwave install)?

The httpd.conf file is pointing to "modules/libphp5.so" and that file 
is the same as it was before I ran the Blastwave installer (the 
Blastwave install).  Should it be a different file?  Or would that 
file not need to be updated?  I did a "find" for libphp5.so, and 
there is only the one version of it.

Obviously, I only expect help with the Blastwave portion of this 
problem, but if anyone has thoughts on the other issues that are a 
part of it, feel free to weigh in.  :-)


Maybe I'll tell you about my ImageMagick problem sometime, since I 
installed that from Blastwave, too, and have some problems there, as 
well.  I'll save that for later, though.  :-)




                                                 Douglas







Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Feb 27 16:13:35 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] CSW GNOME 2.22 for Solaris 8/9/10 update
In-Reply-To: <20080226213627.76af39ec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
Message-ID: <562716.24754.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

CSW GNOME 2.16.3 is being depreciated for CSW GNOME
2.22.

If you have a SunRay device and/or are running Solaris
8/9/10 then you will need to update to the GNOME 2.22
packages to use the newer GNOME applications like
Evince, Pidgin, and GIMP 2.4 which use the newer GTK+.

This was also due to unstability between CSW GNOME
2.16.3 and the newer GTK+ builds.

The new packages are:
atspi-1.21.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gail-1.21.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gconf2-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
glib2-2.15.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
gnome_minimal-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomemime2-2.18.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomespeech-0.4.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomevfs2-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomevfs2mon-2.15.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gtk2-2.12.8-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libatk-1.21.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libbonobo2-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libbonoboui-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libglade2-2.6.2-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libgnome-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libgnomeui-2.21.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libpango-1.19.4-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
orbit2-2.14.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

If you wish to stay at CSW GNOME 2.16.3, secure your
copy from the current stable/unstable repository and
use the older GTK2 2.10.14 packages. This GNOME
desktop environment is 'production' stable and will
work in that configuration. 

I hope to move to CSW GNOME 2.22 in the upcoming weeks
once all testing is done.

~ Ken Mays


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Wed Feb 27 17:08:42 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] CSW GNOME 2.22 for Solaris 8/9/10 update
In-Reply-To: <562716.24754.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20080226213627.76af39ec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<562716.24754.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20080227170842.c8e57214.hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:13:35 -0800 (PST)
ken mays <maybird1776 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> CSW GNOME 2.16.3 is being depreciated for CSW GNOME
> 2.22.
....

> I hope to move to CSW GNOME 2.22 in the upcoming weeks
> once all testing is done.
> 

That's great news! I rolled back my installation to stable 
and will wait for Gnome 2.22 to appear in unstable. 


-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund

From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Wed Feb 27 17:41:37 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:41:37 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an older
	one?
Message-ID: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Hi,

I wanted to install phpmyadmin on our Solaris 10 system, but when I 
did a pkg-get on the Blastwave package of phpmyadmin, it wanted to 
install mysql 5, since phpmyadmin depends on it.  We already have 
mysql 5 installed from a non-Blastwave installation.  If I choose to 
let the installer go ahead and install mysql 5 so that I can get 
phpmyadmin on the system, will doing so screw up our existing mysql 
databases and their interactions with Apache and various Perl scripts 
that refer to them?

If not, and I can go ahead with the install, will I be able to 
configure phpmyadmin to use our existing mysql installation?


Thanks!



                                         Douglas




Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 


From bonivart at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 18:57:28 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
	older one?
In-Reply-To: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Douglas S. Davis <dsdavis at haverford.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I wanted to install phpmyadmin on our Solaris 10 system, but when I
>  did a pkg-get on the Blastwave package of phpmyadmin, it wanted to
>  install mysql 5, since phpmyadmin depends on it.  We already have
>  mysql 5 installed from a non-Blastwave installation.  If I choose to
>  let the installer go ahead and install mysql 5 so that I can get
>  phpmyadmin on the system, will doing so screw up our existing mysql
>  databases and their interactions with Apache and various Perl scripts
>  that refer to them?
>
>  If not, and I can go ahead with the install, will I be able to
>  configure phpmyadmin to use our existing mysql installation?

I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
there can help you.

-- 
/peter

From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Wed Feb 27 19:18:04 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:18:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
"Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:

...
> I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
> there can help you.

There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list 
on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere? 


-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund

From bonivart at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 19:40:28 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:40:28 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
	older one?
In-Reply-To: <20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
Message-ID: <625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
<Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
>
>  ...
>
> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
>  > there can help you.
>
>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?

It's only open to Blastwave developers.

-- 
/peter

From james.hartley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 27 20:11:45 2008
From: james.hartley at gmail.com (James Hartley)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:11:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
	older one?
In-Reply-To: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <8217e8cc0802271111k52e2e25dgc22766882bef7bbc@mail.gmail.com>

well you should probably ask the package maintainer.... I have had a
similar situation with openldap,  Installed a piece of software that
required openldap, and I went ahead and let the pkg-get update the
openldap package...

I got openldap back up and running in about 4 hours... turns out the
installation of the new package wrote over some of my files and
changed permissions on a bunch of others..... PLUS the new default set
up ldap to run at boot.

So.... Moral --- backup your system if you wish to upgrade and ask
before you press the "yes" button.  The package maintain might also be
able to give you additional insights that may not be documented.



On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Douglas S. Davis <dsdavis at haverford.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I wanted to install phpmyadmin on our Solaris 10 system, but when I
>  did a pkg-get on the Blastwave package of phpmyadmin, it wanted to
>  install mysql 5, since phpmyadmin depends on it.  We already have
>  mysql 5 installed from a non-Blastwave installation.  If I choose to
>  let the installer go ahead and install mysql 5 so that I can get
>  phpmyadmin on the system, will doing so screw up our existing mysql
>  databases and their interactions with Apache and various Perl scripts
>  that refer to them?
>
>  If not, and I can go ahead with the install, will I be able to
>  configure phpmyadmin to use our existing mysql installation?
>
>
>  Thanks!
>
>
>
>                                          Douglas
>
>
>
>
>  Douglas S. Davis
>  Programmer/Analyst
>  Haverford College
>  Administrative Computing
>  College Information Resources
>  370 Lancaster Ave.
>  Haverford, PA 19041
>  610-896-4206
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  users mailing list
>  users at lists.blastwave.org
>  https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 21:52:11 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
> <Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
>>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
>>
>>  ...
>>
>> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
>>  > there can help you.
>>
>>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
>>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?
>
> It's only open to Blastwave developers.

Mostly because we like to keep our arguments^H^H^H^Hdiscussions in the
family and the public sees us all smiling.  Just like any other software
company. :-)

Dennis Clarke


From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Wed Feb 27 22:17:03 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:17:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
	<3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20080227221703.e9e84fe5.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST)
"Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org> wrote:

> 
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
> > <Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
> >>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>  ...
> >>
> >> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
> >>  > there can help you.
> >>
> >>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
> >>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?
> >
> > It's only open to Blastwave developers.
> 
> Mostly because we like to keep our arguments^H^H^H^Hdiscussions in the
> family and the public sees us all smiling.  Just like any other
> software company. :-)
> 

Hm, I am a bit ... disappointed. Company, not community. Is this a
freudian slip?  Debian-devel, Gnome-devel, Opensolaris-devel,
Linux-Kernel, all those developer mailing lists are archived and the
archives are open to the public. 
I am a system administrator, not a developer, but it is very useful
for me to look over these lists every few weeks. I can learn about the
further direction of development. I can see how unstable the unstable
branch really is this week. Very often it helps me to solve/avoid
problems. 
Of course you have every right to have your private
discussions - perhaps there could be two developer lists? 


Regards, Meik

-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 22:25:01 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:25:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <20080227221703.e9e84fe5.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
	<3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<20080227221703.e9e84fe5.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
Message-ID: <3119.72.39.133.97.1204147501.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST)
> "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
>> > <Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
>> >>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  ...
>> >>
>> >> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
>> >>  > there can help you.
>> >>
>> >>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
>> >>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?
>> >
>> > It's only open to Blastwave developers.
>>
>> Mostly because we like to keep our arguments^H^H^H^Hdiscussions in the
>> family and the public sees us all smiling.  Just like any other
>> software company. :-)
>>
>
> Hm, I am a bit ... disappointed. Company, not community. Is this a
> freudian slip?

The objective of the Blastwave project has not changed since day zero when
one Solaris user needed help from another Solaris user and that is how
myself and Phil Brown started all this. Ever since then we have lists that
are internal to all the people working on the project and then we have
public lists for various other things.  Mailists for users who can ask
questions. Do you really want to hear and see all the traffic related to me
trying to get the IDMAP and NSS Using LDAP from ADS with RFC2307bis Schema
Extensions in Samba 3.0.28 ??

Not very likely. Even worse ... that sort of traffic can clog up the users
mail lists that are just trying to get the job done.

> Debian-devel, Gnome-devel, Opensolaris-devel,
> Linux-Kernel, all those developer mailing lists are archived and the
> archives are open to the public.

Not all mailists in OpenSolaris.org are public lists. Not all lists in
Debian ( Linux by the way ) are public either.

> I am a system administrator, not a developer, but it is very useful
> for me to look over these lists every few weeks. I can learn about the
> further direction of development. I can see how unstable the unstable
> branch really is this week. Very often it helps me to solve/avoid
> problems.
> Of course you have every right to have your private
> discussions - perhaps there could be two developer lists?

We were always just trying to keep all of out long winded and very technical
discussions from clogging up the world. If you want to join in the project
and maybe do some port work then you too can become another Solaris user
that just wants to help another Solaris user.

Dennis Clarke


From port at cse.psu.edu  Thu Feb 28 14:12:23 2008
From: port at cse.psu.edu (Jeff Port)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:12:23 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Newbie question
Message-ID: <47C6B337.3070205@cse.psu.edu>

Please pardon if this has already been covered, I've done a cursory 
check on the problem but probably do not have enough info to do an 
intelligent search.  Being the newb that I am, I make an assumption that 
everyone uses a script called "cswpkg" to keep their software 
installations up to date and that everyone uses a "master" file that 
contains the list of installed software.

If the above assumption is correct, I have to ask why when I ran the 
script, did it delete all of my emacs installation leaving only the 
Athena Tool Kit?  Further, having gone through about 50 systems after 
running the cswpkg script, I found that at least two new packages that 
it had installed were gone.  How can that happen when they all use the 
same script and master file?


-- 
Jeff Port - IT Support
Computer Science & Engineering Dept
111B Info. Sci. Tech. Bldg
University Park, PA 16802


        ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
         `6_ 6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)       GO LIONS!!!
         (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'
       _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'
      (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-'
	  
"UNIX *is* user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are."


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 28 16:21:30 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:21:30 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Newbie question
In-Reply-To: <47C6B337.3070205@cse.psu.edu>
References: <47C6B337.3070205@cse.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <2473.72.39.133.97.1204212090.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Please pardon if this has already been covered, I've done a cursory
> check on the problem but probably do not have enough info to do an
> intelligent search.  Being the newb that I am, I make an assumption that
> everyone uses a script called "cswpkg" to keep their software
> installations up to date and that everyone uses a "master" file that
> contains the list of installed software.
>
> If the above assumption is correct, I have to ask why when I ran the
> script, did it delete all of my emacs installation leaving only the
> Athena Tool Kit?  Further, having gone through about 50 systems after
> running the cswpkg script, I found that at least two new packages that
> it had installed were gone.  How can that happen when they all use the
> same script and master file?

Not sure what you mean by cswpkg.  Do you mean /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get ?

You should have a conf file that look like so :

url=http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# If you need to use a proxy then configure the next few lines
#ftp_proxy=http://192.168.35.7:8080
#http_proxy=http://192.168.35.7:8080
#export http_proxy ftp_proxy
#
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# If you want to keep a record of each time you ever do
# a catalog update or package fetch then use the next line.
# Be sure to create the directory yourself !  Like so :
#     mkdir -m 0700 /var/spool/pkg-get
#
#PKGGET_DOWNLOAD_DIR=/var/spool/pkg-get/pkg-get.$$
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# On Solaris 10 and upwards this will restric the install to
# the global zone only.
#PKGADDFLAGS=-G
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# To disable use of gpg or md5, uncomment these.  Just leave
# them commented out in order to ensure that each package and
# metafile data is checked for integrity via an MD5 hash.
#use_gpg=false
#use_md5=false

Then just run /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U  followed by

  /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | grep -v Not


That will show you every thing you have installed as well as the revsions.

Dennis Clarke


From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com  Fri Feb  1 22:05:17 2008
From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:05:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Local Filesystem Repository and CSW pkg-get
Message-ID: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>

Is there any way I can point the CSW version of pkg-get to a local filesystem repository like:

/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i openssh -R /my/local/file/system/repos/unstable

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080201/adb3d69c/attachment-0002.html>

From jeremiah.johnson at gmail.com  Fri Feb  1 22:12:17 2008
From: jeremiah.johnson at gmail.com (Jeremiah Johnson)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:12:17 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Local Filesystem Repository and CSW pkg-get
In-Reply-To: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <701ea59b0802011312x1c31131bo3823e3f4838bf8f5@mail.gmail.com>

If you have it on a local filesystem, why not just setup apache and
host it on your lan so all of your machines can get it with minimal
fuss?

On Feb 1, 2008 3:05 PM, JL Picard <jlpicard15 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any way I can point the CSW version of pkg-get to a local
> filesystem repository like:
>
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i openssh -R /my/local/file/system/repos/unstable
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From chewie at wookimus.net  Fri Feb  1 22:34:35 2008
From: chewie at wookimus.net (Chad Walstrom)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:34:35 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Local Filesystem Repository and CSW pkg-get
In-Reply-To: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl> 
References: <BLU127-DAV25BA5FC35698E84435592C0300@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <28950.1201901675@skuld.wookimus.net>

I believe you use file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable...  I
could be wrong.

Chad


From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com  Sat Feb  2 18:18:28 2008
From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:18:28 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] ***SPAM*** RE: Local Filesystem Repository and
	CSW	pkg-get
Message-ID: <BLU127-DAV9A8715C9DC8A43CAF5570C0310@phx.gbl>

Regarding using file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable , since pkg-get uses wget, I just tried:
        wget file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable
and I got a msg like like the following (although you'd think that wget would support this file transfer mechanism)
        file:///my/local/file/system/repos/unstable : Unsupported scheme.

Regarding setting-up an Apache Solution - That isn't going to work, because this is a first installation on an internal LAN with no other connectivity in the short-term besides what I bring on the DVD.  Secondly, it would probably be better to create an internal FTP site before an Apache server, since it's easier to setup and lockdown

Speaking of DVDs, how does the DVD solution offered by blastwave.org work?




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080202/4ddc9461/attachment-0002.html>

From jeff at cjsa.com  Thu Feb  7 03:29:53 2008
From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:29:53 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Tcl/Tk 8.5.1 now in testing
Message-ID: <JvuK9t.1Mx@cjsa.com>

I have placed new copies of the Tcl and Tk Version 8.5.1 packages in
testing.  I would appreciate hearing about any problems people encounter
using them.

Regards,
-- 
Jeff

Jeffery Small  <jeff at blastwave.org>
In real life:  <jeff at cjsa.com>



From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Thu Feb  7 16:14:01 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:14:01 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
Message-ID: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
is it me or is there a problem with evince?
No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.

Thanks,

gerard


From jkwan at jpl.nasa.gov  Thu Feb  7 16:51:45 2008
From: jkwan at jpl.nasa.gov (Joseph Kwan)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:51:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] php5 upgrade and stuff missing from
	no-debug-non-zts-20060613??
Message-ID: <47AB2911.6040601@jpl.nasa.gov>

I was trying to add the php5_gd package and found I had to upgrade 
various other
things, including php5.  When I upgraded that, it seems that I'm now 
missing
all sorts of things in the 
/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613
directory, which ultimately rendered the php5 unusable.

My original CSWphp5:

  PKGINST:  CSWphp5
     NAME:  php5 - PHP Hypertext Processor 5
 CATEGORY:  application
     ARCH:  sparc
  VERSION:  5.2.1,REV=2007.03.15
   VENDOR:  http://www.php.net/downloads.php packaged for CSW by Cory Omand
   PSTAMP:  comand at ra-20070315120756
 INSTDATE:  Oct 29 2007 15:11
  HOTLINE:  http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/
    EMAIL:  comand at blastwave.org
   STATUS:  completely installed
    FILES:      178 installed pathnames
                  6 shared pathnames
                 41 directories
                 27 executables
              33236 blocks used (approx)

And I had the following in 
/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/
bcmath.so      ldap.so        pcntl.so       sockets.so     zip.so
calendar.so    mbstring.so    pdo.so         sysvmsg.so     zlib.so
dom.so         mime_magic.so  session.so     sysvsem.so
exif.so        mysql.so       shmop.so       sysvshm.so
iconv.so       mysqli.so      simplexml.so   xmlreader.so
json.so        openssl.so     soap.so        xmlrpc.so

After upgrading to:

  PKGINST:  CSWphp5
     NAME:  php5 - PHP Hypertext Processor 5
 CATEGORY:  application
     ARCH:  sparc
  VERSION:  5.2.4,REV=2007.10.29
   VENDOR:  http://www.php.net/downloads.php packaged for CSW by Cory Omand
   PSTAMP:  comand at ra-20071029120142
 INSTDATE:  Feb 04 2008 10:20
  HOTLINE:  http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/
    EMAIL:  comand at blastwave.org
   STATUS:  completely installed
    FILES:      157 installed pathnames
                  6 shared pathnames
                 41 directories
                  6 executables
              35051 blocks used (approx)

I only had the following in that directory:
gd.so       ldap.so     mysql.so    mysqli.so   openssl.so  session.so

(I added the php5_gd, but didn't touch the php5_session or the other 
packages which
it tells me is the current version).

It seems many of those items I'm missing were in the CSWphp5 package:

grep sysvshm.so /var/sadm/install/contents
/opt/csw/php5/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/sysvshm.so f 
none 0755 root bin 23000 43550 1173974875 CSWphp5

but not in the installation today.

Anyone have any ideas as to what's up with that directory?  
Interestingly enough, I did the
same thing (upgrade php5 to add php5_gd) on January 25th to another 
Solaris 9 system
and it completed without any problems and I have all the stuff in that 
extension directory
as expected.  Unfortunately I didn't save an upgrade log of the process 
so I don't know if
all those pieces from no-debug-non-zts-20060613 where actually in the 
CSWphp5
package.

thanks,

Joe Kwan
jkwan at jpl.nasa.gov



From aaron at ernieball.com  Thu Feb  7 17:35:52 2008
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:35:52 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>

I remember I used to be the one who thought I was crazy cause Evince 
wouldn't print. That about two years ago though and it wasn't the fault 
of Evince but one of it's dependencies. Back then though Evince would 
crash when you would try to print.

That probably got addressed over a year ago now though. Been using 
Evince for awhile now with no problems.

One thing that came to mind is we use Cups for the printing. If you're 
using the default Solaris printing then you might have a problem.
I don't know though. It just seems like a possible reason to me. I don't 
claim to know anything about the inner workings of Evince.

I know when I got to print in Evince it shows all the printers I have in 
my Cups server.

We used to use the Cups that came on the Solaris Companion CD and used 
the instructions on this page to install it and get it running.
http://www.lengers.com/?p=12

Since then we have updated to the CSW version of Cups and pretty much 
followed those instructions but with /opt/csw paths instead of /opt/sfw 
paths.


Aaron


G?rard Henry wrote:
> hello all,
> is it me or is there a problem with evince?
> No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
> When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
> I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.
>
> Thanks,
>
> gerard
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


From waldirio at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 17:50:50 2008
From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:50:50 -0200
Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: Doubt about two monitors - Solaris 8
In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820802070842g57e9942dt8759e17e8c0c49da@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7df9f1820802070842g57e9942dt8759e17e8c0c49da@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7df9f1820802070850g5aac38aalf08c2e351e0b8d4@mail.gmail.com>

       Friends, good morning

  I sent this email to vnc list (development and supporting), but you know
anythings about this problem ?!


Thanks in advanced.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro <waldirio at gmail.com>
Date: 07/02/2008 14:42
Subject: Doubt about two monitors - Solaris 8
To: vnc-list at realvnc.com


    Hello Friends, good morning

  I would like to ask about two monitors in Solaris 8. I'm trying to capture
the Sparc machine with Solaris 8 by WindowsXP with vnc client. In my
servers, I'm using vnc-4_1_2-sparc_solaris.pkg package (download of
http://www.realvnc.com/products/download.html)

  I prepare the routine below and include in /etc/profile

####################################
cID=`id |cut -d"(" -f2|cut -d")" -f1`
LOCAL=`w |grep $cID|awk '{print $2}'|grep console|wc -l`

if [ $LOCAL -eq 1 ]; then
  PROC_VNC=`ps -ef |grep x0vncserver|sed -e "/grep x0vnc/d"|wc -l`

  if [ $PROC_VNC -ne 1 ]; then
    /apps/vnc/x0vncserver -PasswordFile=/apps/vnc/passwd &
  fi
fi
####################################

This routine check if the user are logged locally, if yes, start x0vncserver
using the password in file /apps/vnc/passwd.

*My problem*.
If I'm using the default configuration in Solaris, when the machine is
captured, only is exibithed the display 0, if I change the Solaris
configuration to xinerama, when capture, the guy can see all display, but
select only the display 0 (the cursor don't go to display 1 or right
screen).

What I can do to fix this problem ?!

Thanks in advanced.
-- 
______________
Regards
Waldirio
msn: wmp at sinope.com.br
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080207/f1f1b697/attachment-0002.html>

From udippel at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 17:36:18 2008
From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:36:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <92bf1a120802070836g2b69fc90g3f2a559972614922@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 7, 2008 10:14 AM, G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
> hello all,
> is it me or is there a problem with evince?
> No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
> When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
> I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.

Okay, yes, though I wonder what SXDE4 is ... :)

There has been some discussion on the opensolaris-lists about this as well.
The problem known is wrong format/100%CPU/no output.
What's your problem?

Uwe


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Thu Feb  7 18:15:26 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:15:26 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <92bf1a120802070836g2b69fc90g3f2a559972614922@mail.gmail.com>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<92bf1a120802070836g2b69fc90g3f2a559972614922@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <47AB3CAE.2040206@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Uwe Dippel a ?crit :
> On Feb 7, 2008 10:14 AM, G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
>> hello all,
>> is it me or is there a problem with evince?
>> No worries... you already have version 2.20.2,REV=2007.12.23 of evince
>> When i want to print, the only choice is to print into a file.
>> I am on S10U4 and SXDE4, and i'm logged in with JDS.
> 
> Okay, yes, though I wonder what SXDE4 is ... :)
> 
Solaris Express Developper Edition release 4
http://developers.sun.com/sxde/

> There has been some discussion on the opensolaris-lists about this as well.
> The problem known is wrong format/100%CPU/no output.
> What's your problem?
> 
my problem is that no printer is presented


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Thu Feb  7 18:28:20 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:28:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Aaron Wilson a ?crit :
> I remember I used to be the one who thought I was crazy cause Evince 
> wouldn't print. That about two years ago though and it wasn't the fault 
> of Evince but one of it's dependencies. Back then though Evince would 
> crash when you would try to print.
> 
> That probably got addressed over a year ago now though. Been using 
> Evince for awhile now with no problems.
> 
> One thing that came to mind is we use Cups for the printing. If you're 
> using the default Solaris printing then you might have a problem.
> I don't know though. It just seems like a possible reason to me. I don't 
> claim to know anything about the inner workings of Evince.
> 
> I know when I got to print in Evince it shows all the printers I have in 
> my Cups server.
> 
> We used to use the Cups that came on the Solaris Companion CD and used 
> the instructions on this page to install it and get it running.
> http://www.lengers.com/?p=12
> 
> Since then we have updated to the CSW version of Cups and pretty much 
> followed those instructions but with /opt/csw paths instead of /opt/sfw 
> paths.
> 

i don't use cups, just the default solaris printing. But as i've just 
upgraded from S10U4 to SXDE, nom evince is delivered by Sun in /usr/bin 
(package SUNWgnome-pdf-viewer), and it works
here are two screenshots:
- first with csw evince Capture.png
http://www.latp.univ-mrs.fr/~henry/Solaris/Capture.png
- second one with sun evince Capture-1.png
http://www.latp.univ-mrs.fr/~henry/Solaris/Capture-1.png



From aaron at ernieball.com  Thu Feb  7 20:02:41 2008
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:02:41 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>
	<47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47AB55D1.7010201@ernieball.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080207/7993ea42/attachment-0002.html>

From a.cervellin at acm.org  Thu Feb  7 20:09:54 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:09:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] evince doesn't print?
In-Reply-To: <47AB55D1.7010201@ernieball.com>
References: <47AB2039.1020009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<47AB3368.4020806@ernieball.com>	<47AB3FB4.1050205@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<47AB55D1.7010201@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <47AB5782.8030004@acm.org>

Aaron Wilson wrote:
> I still suspect the Blastwave version was compiled to use Cups and Sun 
> did some work to get the SXDE/opensolaris version to work with the 
> Solaris print spooler. Either that or possibly another CSW package needs 
> to be installed for the Solaris spooler.

yes, evince has been built to use cups


From a.cervellin at acm.org  Sun Feb 10 10:41:56 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:41:56 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing seamonkey 1.1.8
Message-ID: <47AEC6E4.9000309@acm.org>

Seamonkey 1.1.8 is now available on http://www.blastwave.org/testing
This release contains security and stability fixes.

Following is the rough changelog:
185946 filepicker crashes Mozilla on second press of Open/Browse buttons 
on web-pages
197052 crash if modification innerHTML of element in this element [@ 
js_EmitTree ]
279505 Crash in pop-up window on parent.close() due to double free. [@ 
nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent]
283493 flushing of training data during session practically never 
happens due to too high "# of changes" threshold
301291 Forward-inline ignores outgoing-charset preference
310962 Multiple schema types for a node not being processed correctly
312018 Page with "long" title saved as PDF as "Untitled.pdf"
314432 Get rid of TVector glue in Default Plugin on Mac/Intel
314874 Function.call/apply pass thisArg.valueOf() as the this value when 
thisArg is not a primitive value
316817 [newwidget] Output which parses DOM data and displays it
326035 Page Up and Page Down do not hide cursor
342511 correcting another word (with spell checker) doesn't cause 
current word to be spell-checked
343987 [BeOS] Rendering context and other gfx rework
355067 Package OS/2 cairo support library (mzfntcfg.dll) with SVG builds
355333 [IMAP] Crash when moving or deleting messages [@ 
nsImapProtocol::HandleMessageDownLoadLine]
368864 Menu selection is invisible in SeaMonkey 1.1 on Warp 3
372035 Need to prevent inadvertent bookmarking of javascript: and data: URLs
375292 Stray tmprules.dat files created when getting new messages
375344 accessing prototype of DOM objects throws uncatchable error
376976 Crash [@ nsGlobalHistory::IsURLInHistory] null pointer dereference
377808 0x7d ("}") should be disallowed in hostnames
384937 crashes [@ nsFrameManager::Destroy] upon loading page with iframe
387258 plain text txt file viewing capability lost after having 
downloaded a txt file with content-disposition: attachment and 
content-type: plain/text
387591 JS_GetScopeChain asserts because of native functions
388078 Trunk build broken
388976 [1.1] Support conditional actions (i.e. the `if` attribute)
389136 XML errors when application chrome.rdf exists but is read-only
391019 commandline for external protocol handler is mishandled
391028 drawImage with broken PNG draws random memory
391586 bind on an insert changes the in-scope evaluation context
392944 ecma_3/extensions/regress-320854.js FAIL
393057 valid xsd:dateTime values being marked invalid
393416 Insert or delete of one node can trigger xforms-value-changed on 
a separate form control
394023 Insert of attributes not reflected in bound form controls
396179 Cannot insert elements from xforms namespace using origin 
attribute on insert element
398271 Insert with no `nodeset` declaration causes crash
398499 Crash in DispatchEventToHandlers(EventTargetRec*, 
OpaqueEventRef*, HandlerCallRec*
398668 [FIX]Crash [@ JS_GetPrivate] with binding with destructor, 
setting javascript disabled, reloading and going back
400130 CRASH on function days-from-date() with invalid dates (month zero)
402150 Buffer overrun [@ nsDocument::RetrieveRelevantHeaders] at 
provided URL
403052 Relicence moz*TXTToHTMLConv files
403090 [FIX]Found text is no longer highlighted within INPUT text fields 
and TEXTAREAs
403244 crash [@ Tokenizer::tokenizeHeaders]
403250 [10.5] 1.8 build configured with --enable-strip fails: strip: 
symbols referenced by relocation entries that can't be stripped in: 
.../xpinstall/src/libxpinstall.dylib
403258 [10.5] When using an SDK, many configure checks fail
403406 Cursor does not always change to appropriate pointer after using 
scroll buttons/slider.
403989 Cannot save images with SeaMonkey any more
404051 Add .es to IDN TLD whitelist
404264 Junk Mail Controls to stop abnormally when processing email with 
null "from" (sender)
404391 Firefox input and file focus stealing through label
405255 change in-code URLs to new SeaMonkey website
405584 Canvas.drawImage method is not working
405818 [FIX]Opening about:config results in warning about unresponsive 
script
406214 Dialogs with checkbox have focus on checkbox rather than on the 
default button
406314 Add .ir to the IDN whitelist
406555 the decompiler should not depend on JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8
407303 Getting "Unsafe File Type" error when accessing a site that does 
not exist.
407842 Crash with very large font-size (XIOError exit)
408256 Use a constant-size buffer in BMP decoder to reduce fragmentation
408257 script timer not being reset when Microsoft Silverlight plug-in 
fires event callbacks to Javascript.
408755 Update MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH to NSPR_4_6_8_RTM for Leopard build 
compatibility
408935 Can't --disable-xpcom-obsolete in a 1.8 branch static build
409027 transformiix builds with conflicting visibility on 1.8 branch due 
to header name collision
409066 sNativeRegionPool visibility is wrong in libgkgfx
409849 1.8 branch build for ppc with gcc 4.0 fails: 
.../nsCanvasRenderingContext2D.cpp: 1026: error: invalid conversion from 
'int' to 'CGImageAlphaInfo'
410139 Update SeaMonkey's copyright strings to 2008
410320 Crash when deleting mail, if two windows for the mail are opened 
[@  nsMsgMailSession::OnItemEvent]
410456 URL autocomplete shows double entries
410566 Filter ..apps in file picker when searching for helper 
applications on OS/2
411194 XForms testsuite fails
411710 Land bug 384304 on the 1.8 branch for all non-Firefox/SeaMonkey 
products
411960 Build Break: XForms 1.8
413451 Bug 413250 allows to steal data from sessionstore.js
414856 Firefox 2.0.0.12 RC1 breaks Stylish with "TypeError: stylesheet 
has no properties"


From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Feb 10 19:03:06 2008
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:03:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 2.0.0.12 is available
Message-ID: <47AF3C5A.9090105@wbonnet.net>

Hi

Firefox 2.0.0.12 is in testing. I started it successfully on both sparc 
(Sol10u4) and x86 (snv_79). Thanks for your feed backs.

Cheers

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group





From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Feb 11 10:42:54 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:42:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
Message-ID: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>

Hi,

Have this problem with file-roller:

% /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or 
directory
Killed

% ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
   find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
        libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)

Anyone else seeing this? Bug?

BR MOL


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Mon Feb 11 10:50:40 2008
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:50:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <47B01A70.6050003@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Mats Larsson a ?crit :
> Hi,
> 
> Have this problem with file-roller:
> 
> % /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
> ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or 
> directory
> Killed
> 
> % ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
>    find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
>         libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)
> 

ultra20-henry% ldd /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
...
         libm.so.2 =>     /lib/libm.so.2
ultra20-henry% pkgchk -l -p /lib/libm.so.2
     REMARQUE : impossible de verrouiller la base de donn?es de modules.
Pathname: /lib/libm.so.2
Type: regular file
Expected mode: 0755
Expected owner: root
Expected group: bin
Expected file size (bytes): 317128
Expected sum(1) of contents: 39809
Expected last modification: nov. 30 02:25:07 2007
Referenced by the following packages:
         SUNWlibmsr
Current status: installed

do you have this package installed?

gerard


From james at blastwave.org  Mon Feb 11 10:56:17 2008
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:56:17 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 11/02/08, 09:42:54, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote 
regarding [csw-users] file-roller problem:

> Have this problem with file-roller:

> % /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
> ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or
> directory
> Killed

> % ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
>    find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
>         libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)


Complaint upheld.  The problem is CSWlibart.  It is built for
Solaris 10, hence looks for libm.so.2 not libm.so.1.

Please file a "crash" bug for CSWlibart.



James.




From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Feb 11 10:59:12 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:59:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <47B01A70.6050003@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com> <47B01A70.6050003@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <47B01C70.6080402@ericsson.com>

On 2008-02-11 10:50, G?rard Henry wrote:
> Mats Larsson a ?crit :
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have this problem with file-roller:
>>     
Sorry but did forget to mention I only see it in Solaris 8 and 9. Not in 
10 and Nevada.
>> % /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
>> ld.so.1: file-roller: fatal: libm.so.2: open failed: No such file or 
>> directory
>> Killed
>>
>> % ldd -v /opt/csw/bin/file-roller | grep libm.so.2
>>    find object=libm.so.2; required by /opt/csw/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2
>>         libm.so.2 =>     (file not found)
>>
>>     
>
> ultra20-henry% ldd /opt/csw/bin/file-roller
> ...
>          libm.so.2 =>     /lib/libm.so.2
> ultra20-henry% pkgchk -l -p /lib/libm.so.2
>      REMARQUE : impossible de verrouiller la base de donn?es de modules.
> Pathname: /lib/libm.so.2
> Type: regular file
> Expected mode: 0755
> Expected owner: root
> Expected group: bin
> Expected file size (bytes): 317128
> Expected sum(1) of contents: 39809
> Expected last modification: nov. 30 02:25:07 2007
> Referenced by the following packages:
>          SUNWlibmsr
> Current status: installed
>
> do you have this package installed?
Yes in Solaris 10, not in 8 and 9.

/MOL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080211/1413745d/attachment-0002.html>

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Feb 11 11:01:43 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:01:43 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
	<20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <47B01D07.1080500@ericsson.com>

On 2008-02-11 10:56, James Lee wrote:
> Please file a "crash" bug for CSWlibart.
Did suspect it. Will file a crash bug.



From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Feb 13 14:40:40 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:40:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] file-roller problem
In-Reply-To: <5222AA44-E506-477F-91AC-6892E4B8D0F9@blastwave.org>
References: <47B0189E.6030308@ericsson.com>
	<20080211.9561700.1827523415@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<47B01D07.1080500@ericsson.com>
	<5222AA44-E506-477F-91AC-6892E4B8D0F9@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <47B2F358.5050004@ericsson.com>

On 2008-02-13 13:54, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Although the crash bug is not there: I have versions with binding
Now it's there ;)
> to libm.so.1 in testing/:
>   
> <http://www.blastwave.org/testing/libart-2.3.19,REV=2008.02.13-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz> 
>
>   
> <http://www.blastwave.org/testing/libart-2.3.19,REV=2008.02.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz> 
>
> Please provide feedback soon so I can push out the bugfix ASAP. 
And now it's tested (sparc version) and at least file-roller works like 
a charm.

BR MOL


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 14 06:22:24 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:22:24 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] can I remove a blastwave package?
In-Reply-To: <47B3C88F.1090909@shaw.ca>
References: <cff69c294833.47b35359@shaw.ca>
	<3427.72.39.216.186.1202961576.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<47B3C88F.1090909@shaw.ca>
Message-ID: <4312.72.39.216.186.1202966544.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> I'm guilty. I'm a total newbie. I'm in way over my head. I don't know
> how to admin a SVR4 package in Solaris. Thanks for the tip. I'll read up
> on that.

Let's just get past all that and solve the problem the old fashioned way.
Sorry for being crisp but I never did understand why someone would drop a
pile of logs on a total stranger and then say "fix it". So I had to push
back a little.

That gets us to here.

> I followed the steps on that URL to install the package:
>
> http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/samp_setup.jsp

Right. Been there .. done that and got the t-shirt too.

At this point I am going to forward this email into the users mailist at
blastwave.org and get people involved. I am going to do this because the
guys that know MySQL back to front and in their sleep hang out there and I
know that they will see this and possibly attack it with hammers and a fine
tooth comb.  Also, the guys inside Blastwave know that I am up to my ears
fixing a subversion server problem and I can't stop and play right now.

Let's get some other people involved mmmkay ?

Personally I think you are doing fine .. but something has clearly run amok.

pardon me while I drop kick this into the users mailist here :

    users at lists.blastwave.org

Where I will receive it again.

Dennis

---------- rest of original message -------------

> I installed Solaris 10, set up software raid, configured a static IP,
> followed the steps to get started with Blastwave;
>
> 0 - got patched
> 1 - Installed pkg-get
> 2 - Edited the pkg-get file, digested the md5 sums - The default site is
> now set to url=http://mirror.unixheads.com/csw. The secondary is
> url=http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/blastwave/unstable
> 3 - Installed wget
> 4 - copied admin-fullauto to admin
> 5 - set the path and supath
> 6 - configured apache
> 7 - typed the following:
>
> # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i mysql5 mysql5client mysql5devel mysql5rt
> # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i mysql5test
>
> 8 - Watched the sparks fly.
>
> I had MySQL 4, the one that comes with Solaris 10 installed, tested and
> working previously, but I removed the links to it in the rcX.d
> directories. I put them there in the first place, so I'm pretty sure I
> didn't break anything by removing them. Then I rebooted before trying to
> start version 5.
>
> I added the group and user just like the sun website said to, then
> initialized the database, again like the sun website said to, then
> started MySQL with the command they gave, saw that MySQL was running,
> pkilled MySQL, then used the svcadm command to make sure it starts on boot.
>
>
> Mark
>
>
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I'll skip the pile of logs and just ask the important questions :
>>
>>   1) do you know how to admin SVR4 packages on Solaris ?
>>
>>   2) how did you install this MySQL package ?
>>
>>   Because that package is solid as a rock and if you installed it
>> correctly
>> then you would not have a problem. I can tell by your question "do I just
>> delete the directory?" that you do not know how to admin the system. If
>> you just delete the directory then you will corrupt the package database
>> on the machine.
>>
>> So .. how did you install it ?
>>
>> Dennis


From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Fri Feb 15 09:23:38 2008
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:23:38 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] bad mix of GNU tar and amanda
Message-ID: <20080215082338.7590@gmx.net>

Hi,

the current version of gtar in the blastwave repository is 1.15.91.
According to

  http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/FAQ:What_versions_of_GNU_Tar_are_Amanda-compatible%3F

this is a bad fit for Amanda version 2.4.4p4 from blastwave.

Discussions starting here

  http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/1/8276.html
  http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/2/10184.html
  http://forums.zmanda.com/archive/index.php/t-299.html

confirm my own experience. A backup server with CSWgtar 1.15.1,REV=2006.01.03 worked but a new server with 1.15.91,REV=2006.07.26
does not and shows the error
  sendsize[21716]: time 39057.097: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Unexpected field value in snapshot file
  sendsize[21716]: time 39057.111: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now

in /tmp/amanda/

The corresponding amanda packages were 2.4.4p4,REV=2005.08.05 (old server)
and 2.4.4p4,REV=2006.01.10.x86only (new server).

ciao
     Klaus
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh?rt?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger


From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com  Fri Feb 15 14:43:59 2008
From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:43:59 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] bad mix of GNU tar and amanda
In-Reply-To: <20080215082338.7590@gmx.net>
References: <20080215082338.7590@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <47B5971F.4020608@cognigencorp.com>

Klaus,

Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I use ufsdump on for my
Solaris systems and have never run across this on my Linux systems which
are using GNU tar. I was planning on updating AMANDA really soon per a
request so expect something in /testing soon.


Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the current version of gtar in the blastwave repository is 1.15.91.
> According to
> 
>   http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/FAQ:What_versions_of_GNU_Tar_are_Amanda-compatible%3F
> 
> this is a bad fit for Amanda version 2.4.4p4 from blastwave.
> 
> Discussions starting here
> 
>   http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/1/8276.html
>   http://readlist.com/lists/amanda.org/amanda-users/2/10184.html
>   http://forums.zmanda.com/archive/index.php/t-299.html
> 
> confirm my own experience. A backup server with CSWgtar 1.15.1,REV=2006.01.03 worked but a new server with 1.15.91,REV=2006.07.26
> does not and shows the error
>   sendsize[21716]: time 39057.097: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Unexpected field value in snapshot file
>   sendsize[21716]: time 39057.111: /opt/csw/bin/gtar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> 
> in /tmp/amanda/
> 
> The corresponding amanda packages were 2.4.4p4,REV=2005.08.05 (old server)
> and 2.4.4p4,REV=2006.01.10.x86only (new server).
> 
> ciao
>      Klaus

-- 
Darin Perusich
Unix Systems Administrator
Cognigen Corporation
395 Youngs Rd.
Williamsville, NY 14221
Phone: 716-633-3463
Email: darinper at cognigencorp.com


From pjama at optusnet.com.au  Sun Feb 17 04:04:54 2008
From: pjama at optusnet.com.au (pjama)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:54 +1000
Subject: [csw-users] problems with cups
Message-ID: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>

My system consists of Solaris 10 on a blade 1000, printing to a Canon bubble jet hanging off a HP jet direct print server. All blastwave packages are current (Feb 17, 2008).

I've been using CSW's cups for years but recently had a problem printing multi page docs. My printing needs are small so I'm not sure how long the problem has existed as I usually print one or two pages with no problems. It's 3 or more that are a problem. What happens is that one or two pages comes through OK but the third (and sometimes the second) stops printing half way through and there it hangs. The print job remains in the cups queue until everything is cleared and reset.

I've had a similar problem a few years ago and it was determined by someone on the list to be libgcrypt using the wrong /dev/random ... or something like that. I'm not sure how libgcrypt was determined to be the problem but a new/updated version certainly fixed it.

I have the current version of libgcrypt (1.4.0, circa 20071213) but can't roll back to test as I don't have a previous version.

Does anyone else have a similar problem or any idea how to fix it.

Thanks in advance.
Peter Arnold

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sun Feb 17 04:26:54 2008
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:26:54 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] problems with cups
In-Reply-To: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>
References: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>
Message-ID: <20080216212655.0000395f@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:54 +1000
pjama <pjama at optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> I have the current version of libgcrypt (1.4.0, circa 20071213) but
> can't roll back to test as I don't have a previous version.
> 

If you want to try a previous version, a link to an archive of older
packages is on the Mirrors page.  Here is the link:
http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/

Go to your architecture and 5.8

Alex


-- 


From pjama at optusnet.com.au  Sun Feb 17 11:00:38 2008
From: pjama at optusnet.com.au (pjama)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:00:38 +1000
Subject: [csw-users] problems with cups
In-Reply-To: <20080216212655.0000395f@sws602.mcsun.local>
References: <47B7A456.3040204@optusnet.com.au>
	<20080216212655.0000395f@sws602.mcsun.local>
Message-ID: <47B805C6.5070207@optusnet.com.au>

Thanks Alex, got the two previous versions 1.2.4 and 1.2.3, neither of which seem to solve the problem... sigh. Not sure where to go from here.

Cheers
Peter Arnold

Alex Moore wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:54 +1000
> pjama <pjama at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> 
>> I have the current version of libgcrypt (1.4.0, circa 20071213) but
>> can't roll back to test as I don't have a previous version.
>>
> 
> If you want to try a previous version, a link to an archive of older
> packages is on the Mirrors page.  Here is the link:
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/
> 
> Go to your architecture and 5.8
> 
> Alex
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



From udippel at gmail.com  Mon Feb 18 14:45:53 2008
From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:45:53 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] gupdatedb fails
Message-ID: <92bf1a120802180545y50efc560of0ab41aa7766fa6c@mail.gmail.com>

... agreed, I have many files in a subdirectory, but sufficient space,
around 340MB of RAM, plus some 2GB of swap.

# gupdatedb
sort: insufficient memory; use -S option to increase allocation
Broken Pipe

Uwe


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 17:49:00 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:49:00 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
Message-ID: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>

I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started 
experimenting with Blastwave.

I have a couple questions:

Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it 
installs a package, and if so, where it is located.

Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed 
using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?


Thanks!



                                 Douglas






Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 21 17:55:51 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:55:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started
> experimenting with Blastwave.
>
> I have a couple questions:
>
> Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it
> installs a package, and if so, where it is located.

The software is all compliant with the well established SVR4 UNIX standards
and therefore it works very well with full file logging. Every file or
directory touched or created is logged into /var/sadm/install/contents along
with all files in the entire system.

So you may not be hapy with trying to read that file. It is large and very
very detailed.

For any given package you can use the standard software tracking tools built
into Solaris.  Try the following to see a really detailed report on what is
in a given package :

pkgchk -l CSWfoo

That may be overwhelming also.

So try this :

pkgchk -l CSWfoo | grep Pathname | cut -f2 -d\:

> Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed
> using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?

Again, the standard tools here are your friend.  Please learn the standards
because they will always work.  Use pkgrm CSWfoo to remove any package
cleanly. Be careful because pkgrm will also remove any package in the
machine if you ask it too.

Dennis



From a.cervellin at acm.org  Thu Feb 21 18:03:14 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:03:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <47BDAED2.3000305@acm.org>

Douglas S. Davis wrote:
> I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started 
> experimenting with Blastwave.
> 
> I have a couple questions:
> 
> Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it 
> installs a package, and if so, where it is located.

Blastwave's pkg-get is just a wrapper on Solaris' pkgadd tool, so 
there's not a specific log file.
you can take a look at system files located under /var/sadm/...

> Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed 
> using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?

"pkg-get -r packagename", which is the same of "pkgrm packagename".
there's no way to recursively delete all the dependencies of a package 
you are removing.


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 18:04:21 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:04:21 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org
 >
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Dennis,

Thank you so much for your answer.  I'll look into all of the things 
you suggested.

Obviously, I'm far from a Unix wiz!



                                         Douglas








At 11:55 AM 2/21/2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:

> > I am a programmer for a small college, and have recently started
> > experimenting with Blastwave.
> >
> > I have a couple questions:
> >
> > Does a Blastwave package installation create a log file when it
> > installs a package, and if so, where it is located.
>
>The software is all compliant with the well established SVR4 UNIX standards
>and therefore it works very well with full file logging. Every file or
>directory touched or created is logged into /var/sadm/install/contents along
>with all files in the entire system.
>
>So you may not be hapy with trying to read that file. It is large and very
>very detailed.
>
>For any given package you can use the standard software tracking tools built
>into Solaris.  Try the following to see a really detailed report on what is
>in a given package :
>
>pkgchk -l CSWfoo
>
>That may be overwhelming also.
>
>So try this :
>
>pkgchk -l CSWfoo | grep Pathname | cut -f2 -d\:
>
> > Also, is there a procedure in place to remove a package installed
> > using Blastwave?  If so, what is it?
>
>Again, the standard tools here are your friend.  Please learn the standards
>because they will always work.  Use pkgrm CSWfoo to remove any package
>cleanly. Be careful because pkgrm will also remove any package in the
>machine if you ask it too.
>
>Dennis
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 21 18:11:20 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:11:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] A Couple Questions
In-Reply-To: <200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Dennis,
>
> Thank you so much for your answer.  I'll look into all of the things
> you suggested.
>
> Obviously, I'm far from a Unix wiz!
>

  you are in the right place and asking the right questions.

  that is the best thing you can do.

So feel free to ask anything and we will try to help.

Dennis



From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 21:53:59 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:53:59 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Safe to let pkg-get -u Upgrade pkg-get?
In-Reply-To: <61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org
 >
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>

So I'm trying to install ImageMagick on Solaris 10 using Blastwave.

I run pkg-get to install it, and it tells me I need to upgrade some 
png app or something.  I run the command it recommends, and in the 
process of upgrading various packages, it tells me that pkg-get 
itself needs to be upgraded. Is it safe to let it upgrade itself?  Or 
when I say "yes" that it's okay to uninstall it (prior to it 
installing the latest version), will it no longer be able to upgrade 
itself (as it's been removed)?

Hope that's clear.


For the record, I told it "no" and it continued with other upgrades, 
but if it's safe to do, I'll run it again.




                                                         Douglas












Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 21 22:05:35 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:05:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Safe to let pkg-get -u Upgrade pkg-get?
In-Reply-To: <200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> So I'm trying to install ImageMagick on Solaris 10 using Blastwave.
>
> I run pkg-get to install it, and it tells me I need to upgrade some
> png app or something.  I run the command it recommends, and in the
> process of upgrading various packages, it tells me that pkg-get
> itself needs to be upgraded. Is it safe to let it upgrade itself?  Or
> when I say "yes" that it's okay to uninstall it (prior to it
> installing the latest version), will it no longer be able to upgrade
> itself (as it's been removed)?
>
> Hope that's clear.
>
>
> For the record, I told it "no" and it continued with other upgrades,
> but if it's safe to do, I'll run it again.
>

Well the answer is yes and no.

There was a problem with earlier versions on pkg-get in that they may remove
wget from under itself and then we are stuck not able to upgrade. On Solaris
10 you should not have the problem because there is generally a copy of wget
in /usr/sfw/bin and pkg-get is mighty cunning at looking around for things
like that. :-)

The absolute safe thing to do is something like this :

cd /tmp
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -d pkg_get
pkgrm CSWpkgget
pkgadd -d ./pkg_get-3.8.4-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg

Now you have the latest ... life is good.

Dennis



From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Thu Feb 21 22:59:18 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:59:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Safe to let pkg-get -u Upgrade pkg-get?
In-Reply-To: <1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Thanks, Dennis.

I did as you said, and it went perfectly.

I then ran the pkg-get -u again, and it said wget needed upgrading, 
so I did the same steps you described for wget, and it worked fine, 
too.  (I *did* first have to gunzip the wget package, though).  Would 
it have been safe to let "pkg-get -u" upgrade wget?  Or could it have 
caused a problem, too?

Thanks!




                         Douglas







At 04:05 PM 2/21/2008, you wrote:

> > So I'm trying to install ImageMagick on Solaris 10 using Blastwave.
> >
> > I run pkg-get to install it, and it tells me I need to upgrade some
> > png app or something.  I run the command it recommends, and in the
> > process of upgrading various packages, it tells me that pkg-get
> > itself needs to be upgraded. Is it safe to let it upgrade itself?  Or
> > when I say "yes" that it's okay to uninstall it (prior to it
> > installing the latest version), will it no longer be able to upgrade
> > itself (as it's been removed)?
> >
> > Hope that's clear.
> >
> >
> > For the record, I told it "no" and it continued with other upgrades,
> > but if it's safe to do, I'll run it again.
> >
>
>Well the answer is yes and no.
>
>There was a problem with earlier versions on pkg-get in that they may remove
>wget from under itself and then we are stuck not able to upgrade. On Solaris
>10 you should not have the problem because there is generally a copy of wget
>in /usr/sfw/bin and pkg-get is mighty cunning at looking around for things
>like that. :-)
>
>The absolute safe thing to do is something like this :
>
>cd /tmp
>/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U
>/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -d pkg_get
>pkgrm CSWpkgget
>pkgadd -d ./pkg_get-3.8.4-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg
>
>Now you have the latest ... life is good.
>
>Dennis
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Tue Feb 26 20:24:48 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:24:48 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Hi,

Thanks, again, to all for the help with my basic Blastwave questions 
the other day.  Here are a couple more:


I'm trying to get Zen Cart working on our Solaris 10 web server which 
runs Apache 2.0.58.

When I run the Zen Cart installer, it gives me the following screen:

http://people.haverford.edu/auser/zen.jpg


It shows two important things: that MySQL support is not enabled, and 
that the PHP version is 5.1.4.


Working with some others here, we believe the cause of the MySQL 
support not being enabled is that PHP was installed previously 
without support for MySQL.

I had hoped to install a newer version of PHP with MySQL support, so 
I installed the php5 package from Blastwave.  The installation seemed 
to go fine, and I stopped and then restarted Apache, but when I look 
at that Zen Cart installer screen, it is still showing the old version of PHP.

What do I need to do to get Apache to use the latest install of PHP 
(the Blastwave install)?

The httpd.conf file is pointing to "modules/libphp5.so" and that file 
is the same as it was before I ran the Blastwave installer (the 
Blastwave install).  Should it be a different file?  Or would that 
file not need to be updated?  I did a "find" for libphp5.so, and 
there is only the one version of it.

Obviously, I only expect help with the Blastwave portion of this 
problem, but if anyone has thoughts on the other issues that are a 
part of it, feel free to weigh in.  :-)


Maybe I'll tell you about my ImageMagick problem sometime, since I 
installed that from Blastwave, too, and have some problems there, as 
well.  I'll save that for later, though.  :-)




                                                 Douglas







Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Tue Feb 26 21:36:27 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:36:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Gnome random freezes
Message-ID: <20080226213627.76af39ec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>


I just installed Blastwave/unstable gnome on a Solaris 10 x86 Sunray 
server and we experience the random hangs/freezes already 
discussed on this list, e.g., in
<http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2007-December/003109.html>

I tried to install gtk2-2.10.14 from blastwave/testing 
but this breaks (at least) evince. Evince  complains about unresolved
symbols. 
Is there anything else I can do? Does it make sense to try my luck 
with the gtk2-2.12.8 package from testing?

Best regards, Meik

-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Tue Feb 26 22:53:11 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:53:11 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <200802262151.m1QLpawq008758@smtp2.haverford.edu>

As a follow-up to my last message about trying to get PHP5 installed 
with Apache, I renamed the libphp5.so file to libphp5.so.OLD, then 
commented out all references to PHP in the httpd.conf file.  I 
stopped apache, then restarted it.

I did a pkgrm for CSWphp5, then did a pkg-get for it.  It installed, 
but doesn't create a new libphp5.so file.  Is it supposed to?

In looking at the PHP info from the Zen Cart installer (I included a 
partial screen cap in my last post), I see that the version of PHP it 
is showing is 5.1.4, but the paths to various PHP files is listed as 
the csw path (the Blastwave location), so I'm not sure what I need to 
change to get Apache/Zen Cart to recognize the 5.2.4 version of PHP 
that I installed from Blastwave.

Thanks for any help you can provide.



                                 Douglas








At 02:24 PM 2/26/2008, Douglas S. Davis wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks, again, to all for the help with my basic Blastwave questions
>the other day.  Here are a couple more:
>
>
>I'm trying to get Zen Cart working on our Solaris 10 web server which
>runs Apache 2.0.58.
>
>When I run the Zen Cart installer, it gives me the following screen:
>
>http://people.haverford.edu/auser/zen.jpg
>
>
>It shows two important things: that MySQL support is not enabled, and
>that the PHP version is 5.1.4.
>
>
>Working with some others here, we believe the cause of the MySQL
>support not being enabled is that PHP was installed previously
>without support for MySQL.
>
>I had hoped to install a newer version of PHP with MySQL support, so
>I installed the php5 package from Blastwave.  The installation seemed
>to go fine, and I stopped and then restarted Apache, but when I look
>at that Zen Cart installer screen, it is still showing the old version of PHP.
>
>What do I need to do to get Apache to use the latest install of PHP
>(the Blastwave install)?
>
>The httpd.conf file is pointing to "modules/libphp5.so" and that file
>is the same as it was before I ran the Blastwave installer (the
>Blastwave install).  Should it be a different file?  Or would that
>file not need to be updated?  I did a "find" for libphp5.so, and
>there is only the one version of it.
>
>Obviously, I only expect help with the Blastwave portion of this
>problem, but if anyone has thoughts on the other issues that are a
>part of it, feel free to weigh in.  :-)
>
>
>Maybe I'll tell you about my ImageMagick problem sometime, since I
>installed that from Blastwave, too, and have some problems there, as
>well.  I'll save that for later, though.  :-)
>
>
>
>
>                                                  Douglas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Douglas S. Davis
>Programmer/Analyst
>Haverford College
>Administrative Computing
>College Information Resources
>370 Lancaster Ave.
>Haverford, PA 19041
>610-896-4206
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From comand at blastwave.org  Tue Feb 26 23:23:13 2008
From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:23:13 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802262151.m1QLpawq008758@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802262151.m1QLpawq008758@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <ffd485d70802261423td2050c8lc41ea39f3bbefc0f@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Douglas S. Davis <dsdavis at haverford.edu> wrote:
> As a follow-up to my last message about trying to get PHP5 installed
>  with Apache, I renamed the libphp5.so file to libphp5.so.OLD, then
>  commented out all references to PHP in the httpd.conf file.  I
>  stopped apache, then restarted it.
>
>  I did a pkgrm for CSWphp5, then did a pkg-get for it.  It installed,
>  but doesn't create a new libphp5.so file.  Is it supposed to?

IIRC, it won't recreate files that Solaris believes to be already
installed.  The file to check when you want to reconfigure your
modules is /opt/csw/php5/lib/php.ini.

- C.


From magrawal at coba.usf.edu  Wed Feb 27 02:27:56 2008
From: magrawal at coba.usf.edu (Agrawal, Manish)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:27:56 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?
In-Reply-To: <200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802211647.m1LGledu007429@smtp2.haverford.edu><61031.70.52.132.107.1203612951.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><200802211703.m1LH30fX009069@smtp2.haverford.edu><61059.70.52.132.107.1203613880.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><200802212052.m1LKqclm001629@smtp2.haverford.edu><1559.72.39.133.97.1203627935.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org><200802212157.m1LLvvKw010310@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<200802261923.m1QJNC3k021893@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <AC6230A5F7852248946CFC481739A95E05EAFB17@tiki.fastmail.usf.edu>

Well, you also need to install 2 additional packages to complete the
SAMP stack - php_mysql5 and ap2_modphp (the package names may be
different, but you get the idea). These packages seem to link the
components together

Manish

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces+magrawal=coba.usf.edu at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces+magrawal=coba.usf.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On
Behalf Of Douglas S. Davis
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:25 PM
To: questions and discussions
Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 Install, but no new libphp5.so?

Hi,

Thanks, again, to all for the help with my basic Blastwave questions 
the other day.  Here are a couple more:


I'm trying to get Zen Cart working on our Solaris 10 web server which 
runs Apache 2.0.58.

When I run the Zen Cart installer, it gives me the following screen:

http://people.haverford.edu/auser/zen.jpg


It shows two important things: that MySQL support is not enabled, and 
that the PHP version is 5.1.4.


Working with some others here, we believe the cause of the MySQL 
support not being enabled is that PHP was installed previously 
without support for MySQL.

I had hoped to install a newer version of PHP with MySQL support, so 
I installed the php5 package from Blastwave.  The installation seemed 
to go fine, and I stopped and then restarted Apache, but when I look 
at that Zen Cart installer screen, it is still showing the old version
of PHP.

What do I need to do to get Apache to use the latest install of PHP 
(the Blastwave install)?

The httpd.conf file is pointing to "modules/libphp5.so" and that file 
is the same as it was before I ran the Blastwave installer (the 
Blastwave install).  Should it be a different file?  Or would that 
file not need to be updated?  I did a "find" for libphp5.so, and 
there is only the one version of it.

Obviously, I only expect help with the Blastwave portion of this 
problem, but if anyone has thoughts on the other issues that are a 
part of it, feel free to weigh in.  :-)


Maybe I'll tell you about my ImageMagick problem sometime, since I 
installed that from Blastwave, too, and have some problems there, as 
well.  I'll save that for later, though.  :-)




                                                 Douglas







Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Wed Feb 27 16:13:35 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] CSW GNOME 2.22 for Solaris 8/9/10 update
In-Reply-To: <20080226213627.76af39ec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
Message-ID: <562716.24754.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

CSW GNOME 2.16.3 is being depreciated for CSW GNOME
2.22.

If you have a SunRay device and/or are running Solaris
8/9/10 then you will need to update to the GNOME 2.22
packages to use the newer GNOME applications like
Evince, Pidgin, and GIMP 2.4 which use the newer GTK+.

This was also due to unstability between CSW GNOME
2.16.3 and the newer GTK+ builds.

The new packages are:
atspi-1.21.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gail-1.21.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gconf2-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
glib2-2.15.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnome-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
gnome_minimal-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomedesktop-2.22.0-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomemime2-2.18.0-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomespeech-0.4.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomevfs2-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnomevfs2mon-2.15.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gtk2-2.12.8-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libatk-1.21.5-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libbonobo2-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libbonoboui-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libcairo-1.4.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libglade2-2.6.2-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libgnome-2.21.90-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libgnomeui-2.21.91-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libpango-1.19.4-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
orbit2-2.14.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

If you wish to stay at CSW GNOME 2.16.3, secure your
copy from the current stable/unstable repository and
use the older GTK2 2.10.14 packages. This GNOME
desktop environment is 'production' stable and will
work in that configuration. 

I hope to move to CSW GNOME 2.22 in the upcoming weeks
once all testing is done.

~ Ken Mays


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Wed Feb 27 17:08:42 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] CSW GNOME 2.22 for Solaris 8/9/10 update
In-Reply-To: <562716.24754.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20080226213627.76af39ec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<562716.24754.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20080227170842.c8e57214.hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:13:35 -0800 (PST)
ken mays <maybird1776 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> CSW GNOME 2.16.3 is being depreciated for CSW GNOME
> 2.22.
....

> I hope to move to CSW GNOME 2.22 in the upcoming weeks
> once all testing is done.
> 

That's great news! I rolled back my installation to stable 
and will wait for Gnome 2.22 to appear in unstable. 


-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund


From dsdavis at haverford.edu  Wed Feb 27 17:41:37 2008
From: dsdavis at haverford.edu (Douglas S. Davis)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:41:37 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an older
	one?
Message-ID: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>

Hi,

I wanted to install phpmyadmin on our Solaris 10 system, but when I 
did a pkg-get on the Blastwave package of phpmyadmin, it wanted to 
install mysql 5, since phpmyadmin depends on it.  We already have 
mysql 5 installed from a non-Blastwave installation.  If I choose to 
let the installer go ahead and install mysql 5 so that I can get 
phpmyadmin on the system, will doing so screw up our existing mysql 
databases and their interactions with Apache and various Perl scripts 
that refer to them?

If not, and I can go ahead with the install, will I be able to 
configure phpmyadmin to use our existing mysql installation?


Thanks!



                                         Douglas




Douglas S. Davis
Programmer/Analyst
Haverford College
Administrative Computing
College Information Resources
370 Lancaster Ave.
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-4206 



From bonivart at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 18:57:28 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
	older one?
In-Reply-To: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Douglas S. Davis <dsdavis at haverford.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I wanted to install phpmyadmin on our Solaris 10 system, but when I
>  did a pkg-get on the Blastwave package of phpmyadmin, it wanted to
>  install mysql 5, since phpmyadmin depends on it.  We already have
>  mysql 5 installed from a non-Blastwave installation.  If I choose to
>  let the installer go ahead and install mysql 5 so that I can get
>  phpmyadmin on the system, will doing so screw up our existing mysql
>  databases and their interactions with Apache and various Perl scripts
>  that refer to them?
>
>  If not, and I can go ahead with the install, will I be able to
>  configure phpmyadmin to use our existing mysql installation?

I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
there can help you.

-- 
/peter


From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Wed Feb 27 19:18:04 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:18:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
"Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:

...
> I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
> there can help you.

There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list 
on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere? 


-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund


From bonivart at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 19:40:28 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:40:28 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
	older one?
In-Reply-To: <20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
Message-ID: <625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
<Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
>
>  ...
>
> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
>  > there can help you.
>
>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?

It's only open to Blastwave developers.

-- 
/peter


From james.hartley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 27 20:11:45 2008
From: james.hartley at gmail.com (James Hartley)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:11:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
	older one?
In-Reply-To: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
Message-ID: <8217e8cc0802271111k52e2e25dgc22766882bef7bbc@mail.gmail.com>

well you should probably ask the package maintainer.... I have had a
similar situation with openldap,  Installed a piece of software that
required openldap, and I went ahead and let the pkg-get update the
openldap package...

I got openldap back up and running in about 4 hours... turns out the
installation of the new package wrote over some of my files and
changed permissions on a bunch of others..... PLUS the new default set
up ldap to run at boot.

So.... Moral --- backup your system if you wish to upgrade and ask
before you press the "yes" button.  The package maintain might also be
able to give you additional insights that may not be documented.



On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Douglas S. Davis <dsdavis at haverford.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I wanted to install phpmyadmin on our Solaris 10 system, but when I
>  did a pkg-get on the Blastwave package of phpmyadmin, it wanted to
>  install mysql 5, since phpmyadmin depends on it.  We already have
>  mysql 5 installed from a non-Blastwave installation.  If I choose to
>  let the installer go ahead and install mysql 5 so that I can get
>  phpmyadmin on the system, will doing so screw up our existing mysql
>  databases and their interactions with Apache and various Perl scripts
>  that refer to them?
>
>  If not, and I can go ahead with the install, will I be able to
>  configure phpmyadmin to use our existing mysql installation?
>
>
>  Thanks!
>
>
>
>                                          Douglas
>
>
>
>
>  Douglas S. Davis
>  Programmer/Analyst
>  Haverford College
>  Administrative Computing
>  College Information Resources
>  370 Lancaster Ave.
>  Haverford, PA 19041
>  610-896-4206
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  users mailing list
>  users at lists.blastwave.org
>  https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 21:52:11 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
> <Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
>>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
>>
>>  ...
>>
>> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
>>  > there can help you.
>>
>>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
>>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?
>
> It's only open to Blastwave developers.

Mostly because we like to keep our arguments^H^H^H^Hdiscussions in the
family and the public sees us all smiling.  Just like any other software
company. :-)

Dennis Clarke



From Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de  Wed Feb 27 22:17:03 2008
From: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de (Meik Hellmund)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:17:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
	<3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20080227221703.e9e84fe5.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST)
"Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org> wrote:

> 
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
> > <Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
> >>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>  ...
> >>
> >> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
> >>  > there can help you.
> >>
> >>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
> >>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?
> >
> > It's only open to Blastwave developers.
> 
> Mostly because we like to keep our arguments^H^H^H^Hdiscussions in the
> family and the public sees us all smiling.  Just like any other
> software company. :-)
> 

Hm, I am a bit ... disappointed. Company, not community. Is this a
freudian slip?  Debian-devel, Gnome-devel, Opensolaris-devel,
Linux-Kernel, all those developer mailing lists are archived and the
archives are open to the public. 
I am a system administrator, not a developer, but it is very useful
for me to look over these lists every few weeks. I can learn about the
further direction of development. I can see how unstable the unstable
branch really is this week. Very often it helps me to solve/avoid
problems. 
Of course you have every right to have your private
discussions - perhaps there could be two developer lists? 


Regards, Meik

-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund


From dclarke at blastwave.org  Wed Feb 27 22:25:01 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:25:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Will a Blastwave install take precedence over an
 older one?
In-Reply-To: <20080227221703.e9e84fe5.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
References: <200802271640.m1RGe0XX014172@smtp2.haverford.edu>
	<625385e30802270957s61e020cepfdb121b59ce54712@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080227191804.6fe3ebec.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
	<625385e30802271040x5af7ba0fl36d098f3d72a0f4c@mail.gmail.com>
	<3039.72.39.133.97.1204145531.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
	<20080227221703.e9e84fe5.Meik.Hellmund@math.uni-leipzig.de>
Message-ID: <3119.72.39.133.97.1204147501.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST)
> "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke at blastwave.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Meik Hellmund
>> > <Meik.Hellmund at math.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:28 +0100
>> >>  "Peter Bonivart" <bonivart at blastwave.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  ...
>> >>
>> >> > I have forwarded your questions to the dev list to see if someone
>> >>  > there can help you.
>> >>
>> >>  There is a developer mailing list? I didn't find this list
>> >>  on blastwave.org. Is it archived somewhere?
>> >
>> > It's only open to Blastwave developers.
>>
>> Mostly because we like to keep our arguments^H^H^H^Hdiscussions in the
>> family and the public sees us all smiling.  Just like any other
>> software company. :-)
>>
>
> Hm, I am a bit ... disappointed. Company, not community. Is this a
> freudian slip?

The objective of the Blastwave project has not changed since day zero when
one Solaris user needed help from another Solaris user and that is how
myself and Phil Brown started all this. Ever since then we have lists that
are internal to all the people working on the project and then we have
public lists for various other things.  Mailists for users who can ask
questions. Do you really want to hear and see all the traffic related to me
trying to get the IDMAP and NSS Using LDAP from ADS with RFC2307bis Schema
Extensions in Samba 3.0.28 ??

Not very likely. Even worse ... that sort of traffic can clog up the users
mail lists that are just trying to get the job done.

> Debian-devel, Gnome-devel, Opensolaris-devel,
> Linux-Kernel, all those developer mailing lists are archived and the
> archives are open to the public.

Not all mailists in OpenSolaris.org are public lists. Not all lists in
Debian ( Linux by the way ) are public either.

> I am a system administrator, not a developer, but it is very useful
> for me to look over these lists every few weeks. I can learn about the
> further direction of development. I can see how unstable the unstable
> branch really is this week. Very often it helps me to solve/avoid
> problems.
> Of course you have every right to have your private
> discussions - perhaps there could be two developer lists?

We were always just trying to keep all of out long winded and very technical
discussions from clogging up the world. If you want to join in the project
and maybe do some port work then you too can become another Solaris user
that just wants to help another Solaris user.

Dennis Clarke



From port at cse.psu.edu  Thu Feb 28 14:12:23 2008
From: port at cse.psu.edu (Jeff Port)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:12:23 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Newbie question
Message-ID: <47C6B337.3070205@cse.psu.edu>

Please pardon if this has already been covered, I've done a cursory 
check on the problem but probably do not have enough info to do an 
intelligent search.  Being the newb that I am, I make an assumption that 
everyone uses a script called "cswpkg" to keep their software 
installations up to date and that everyone uses a "master" file that 
contains the list of installed software.

If the above assumption is correct, I have to ask why when I ran the 
script, did it delete all of my emacs installation leaving only the 
Athena Tool Kit?  Further, having gone through about 50 systems after 
running the cswpkg script, I found that at least two new packages that 
it had installed were gone.  How can that happen when they all use the 
same script and master file?


-- 
Jeff Port - IT Support
Computer Science & Engineering Dept
111B Info. Sci. Tech. Bldg
University Park, PA 16802


        ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
         `6_ 6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)       GO LIONS!!!
         (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'
       _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'
      (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-'
	  
"UNIX *is* user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are."



From dclarke at blastwave.org  Thu Feb 28 16:21:30 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:21:30 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Newbie question
In-Reply-To: <47C6B337.3070205@cse.psu.edu>
References: <47C6B337.3070205@cse.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <2473.72.39.133.97.1204212090.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>


> Please pardon if this has already been covered, I've done a cursory
> check on the problem but probably do not have enough info to do an
> intelligent search.  Being the newb that I am, I make an assumption that
> everyone uses a script called "cswpkg" to keep their software
> installations up to date and that everyone uses a "master" file that
> contains the list of installed software.
>
> If the above assumption is correct, I have to ask why when I ran the
> script, did it delete all of my emacs installation leaving only the
> Athena Tool Kit?  Further, having gone through about 50 systems after
> running the cswpkg script, I found that at least two new packages that
> it had installed were gone.  How can that happen when they all use the
> same script and master file?

Not sure what you mean by cswpkg.  Do you mean /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get ?

You should have a conf file that look like so :

url=http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# If you need to use a proxy then configure the next few lines
#ftp_proxy=http://192.168.35.7:8080
#http_proxy=http://192.168.35.7:8080
#export http_proxy ftp_proxy
#
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# If you want to keep a record of each time you ever do
# a catalog update or package fetch then use the next line.
# Be sure to create the directory yourself !  Like so :
#     mkdir -m 0700 /var/spool/pkg-get
#
#PKGGET_DOWNLOAD_DIR=/var/spool/pkg-get/pkg-get.$$
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# On Solaris 10 and upwards this will restric the install to
# the global zone only.
#PKGADDFLAGS=-G
#-------------------------------------------------------------
# To disable use of gpg or md5, uncomment these.  Just leave
# them commented out in order to ensure that each package and
# metafile data is checked for integrity via an MD5 hash.
#use_gpg=false
#use_md5=false

Then just run /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U  followed by

  /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | grep -v Not


That will show you every thing you have installed as well as the revsions.

Dennis Clarke