From chaljan at gmail.com Mon Jun 2 19:32:54 2008 From: chaljan at gmail.com (Jan Chaloupecky) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:32:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] bug in CSWphp5 ? In-Reply-To: <4840675F.6030805@acm.org> References: <8ab325f80805300204g7057b5a9kff7e52efe88976dc@mail.gmail.com> <4840675F.6030805@acm.org> Message-ID: <8ab325f80806021032x78d5d25dyfada978558627d19@mail.gmail.com> ok thanks, regards Jan. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Alessio wrote: > Jan Chaloupecky wrote: > >> I talked about this in the #pear IRC channel and I was told that if >> the Structure package is missing the installation is likely broken. >> The quick solution I use is just to unpack the Structure directory >> from the Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz to the php include path >> (include_path='/opt/csw/php5/lib/php') which fixes the issue but it's >> not really a clean solution. >> >> Do you confirm this misconfiguration ? > > well, it seems you are right... i just opened a bug on mantis > http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0002907 > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From KPaskett at srlonline.org Mon Jun 2 21:29:52 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:29:52 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? Message-ID: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> The catalog seems to be out of date. Recent packages on the web site shows: May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz While: # pkg-get -c postfix WARNING: gpg not found # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) software localrev remoterev postfix [Not installed] 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 And pkg-get -i postfix fails: Trying http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz --2008-06-02 13:29:03-- http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2008-06-02 13:29:04 ERROR 404: Not Found. Error downloading http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz (Perhaps you need to update your catalog?) postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz: No such file or directory - Keith From KPaskett at srlonline.org Mon Jun 2 21:59:16 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:59:16 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> Before someone asks, I did run 'pkg-get -U' first. - Keith Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz > > While: > > # pkg-get -c postfix > WARNING: gpg not found > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) > software localrev remoterev > postfix [Not installed] 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 > > And pkg-get -i postfix fails: > > Trying > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > --2008-06-02 13:29:03-- > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 > Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > 2008-06-02 13:29:04 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > Error downloading > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > (Perhaps you need to update your catalog?) > postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz: No such file or > directory > > - Keith > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From blastwave at gmail.com Mon Jun 2 22:39:56 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:39:56 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz try a faster mirror http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Dennis From KPaskett at srlonline.org Mon Jun 2 23:08:13 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:08:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <4844613D.2060108@srlonline.org> Dennis Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Keith Paskett wrote: > >> The catalog seems to be out of date. >> >> Recent packages on the web site shows: >> May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz >> > > try a faster mirror > > http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > Yes. That works. The problem isn't that the new postfix package isn't there. The problem is that the latest catalog entry for postfix is pointing to the older version (postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz). - Keith From KPaskett at srlonline.org Tue Jun 3 01:05:11 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:05:11 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <48447CA7.5050701@srlonline.org> Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz > It turns out the catalog really is BROKEN at least for postfix. On the three server's I've tried (mirrors.usc.edu, ibiblio.org, and blastwave.network.com), The postfix package on the server is 2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28, but the catalog entry is postfix 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 - Keith From magrawal at coba.usf.edu Tue Jun 3 17:20:32 2008 From: magrawal at coba.usf.edu (Agrawal, Manish) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:20:32 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> Message-ID: I am running into a problem with CSWgrcypt. I tried installing nessus and gnome, but could not install either because of the ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt problem. I too have done pkg-get -U. Trying to install dependancy gtk2 No existing install of CSWgtk2 found. Installing... Pre-existing local file gtk2-2.12.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgtk2 Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i gtk2 to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWgtk2 failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgconf2 Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i gconf2 to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWgconf2 failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWbluefish Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i bluefish to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWbluefish failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgnome Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i gnome to (re)install Thanks Manish -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+magrawal=coba.usf.edu at lists.blastwave.org on behalf of Keith Paskett Sent: Mon 6/2/2008 3:59 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] catalog out of date? Before someone asks, I did run 'pkg-get -U' first. - Keith Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz > > While: > > # pkg-get -c postfix > WARNING: gpg not found > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) > software localrev remoterev > postfix [Not installed] 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 > > And pkg-get -i postfix fails: > > Trying > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > --2008-06-02 13:29:03-- > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 > Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > 2008-06-02 13:29:04 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > Error downloading > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > (Perhaps you need to update your catalog?) > postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz: No such file or > directory > > - Keith > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 3877 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080603/705dc790/attachment.bin From a.cervellin at acm.org Tue Jun 3 20:30:36 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:30:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <48458DCC.8050701@acm.org> Agrawal, Manish wrote: > I am running into a problem with CSWgrcypt. I tried installing nessus and gnome, but could not install either because of the ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt problem. I too have done pkg-get -U. the catalog will be fixed as soon as possible, try again tomorrow. thanks From r1mikey at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 11:55:52 2008 From: r1mikey at gmail.com (Michael van der Westhuizen) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:55:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Small bug in bin/checkpkg (with test case and patch) Message-ID: Hi All, I've found a small bug in bin/checkpkg which prevents pm_digestmd2 from passing checkpkg. The test case looks like this: ---- snip ---- #!/bin/ksh -p software=pm_digestmd2 case $software in *[A-Z]*) echo "Existing method: FAIL" ;; *) echo "Existing method: PASS" ;; esac lcsoftware=`echo $software | /usr/bin/tr "[A-Z]" "[a-z]"` if [ x"${lcsoftware}" != x"${software}" ]; then echo "New method: FAIL" else echo "New method: PASS" fi ---- snip ---- Run on my Solaris 10 u5 box this prints: [michael at pkgbld csw]$ ~/testbug.ksh Existing method: FAIL New method: PASS A patch for checkpkg follows: [michael at pkgbld csw]$ svn diff bin/checkpkg Index: bin/checkpkg =================================================================== --- bin/checkpkg (revision 2141) +++ bin/checkpkg (working copy) @@ -142,12 +142,12 @@ basedir=`sed -n 's/^BASEDIR=//p' $TMPFILE` pkgarch=`sed -n 's/^ARCH=//p' $TMPFILE|head -1` -case $software in - *[A-Z]*) +lcsoftware=`echo $software | /usr/bin/tr "[A-Z]" "[a-z]"` + +if [ x"${lcsoftware}" != x"${software}" ]; then echo ERROR: $software must be all lowercase exit 1 - ;; -esac +fi case `basename $f` in ${software}-${version}-*) Michael From r1mikey at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 11:58:29 2008 From: r1mikey at gmail.com (Michael van der Westhuizen) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:58:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] bin/mkpackage and cleaning the package spool (patch) Message-ID: Hi, When building packages as a user, the package spool cleanup portion of bin/mkpackage requires user input when removing files with 0444 privileges. This small patch corrects that. Michael Index: bin/mkpackage =================================================================== --- bin/mkpackage (revision 2141) +++ bin/mkpackage (working copy) @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ my $pkgname = $config{pkgname}; my $existing_pkgspool = catfile $spooldir, $pkgname; - vexec( "rm -r $existing_pkgspool", "Failed to remove $existing_pkgspool" ) + vexec( "rm -rf $existing_pkgspool", "Failed to remove $existing_pkgspool" ) if -d $existing_pkgspool; } From udippel at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 15:39:08 2008 From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:39:08 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] gupdatedb in findutils fails Message-ID: <48469AFC.4000900@gmail.com> Okay, I got some 400.000 files when it started to fail, but now, with some 130.000, it still fails: # gupdatedb sort: insufficient memory; use -S option to increase allocation Broken Pipe # uname -a SunOS SolU 5.11 snv_81 i86pc i386 i86pc Does this have to do anything with these:? http://mlblog.osdir.com/os.solaris.solarisx86/2005-01/msg00051.html http://osdir.com/ml/solaris.solarisx86/2005-01/msg00024.html Uwe From udippel at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 15:43:23 2008 From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:43:23 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem Message-ID: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> # pkg-get -U # pkg-get -u > ... > gnomekeyring is up to date > Removing invalid local file glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > Trying > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > --21:29:19-- > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > => `glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz' > Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 > Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 2,775,949 (2.6M) [text/plain] > > 100%[====================================>] 2,775,949 60.27K/s > ETA 00:00 > > 21:30:25 (44.99 KB/s) - `glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz' saved > [2775949/2775949] > > ERROR: checksum glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does not match > remote checksum > (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) > glib is up to date > ... I did repeat the steps a few times ... Uwe From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Jun 4 17:05:14 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:05:14 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> References: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> Uwe Dippel wrote: >> ERROR: checksum glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does not match >> remote checksum >> (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) >> glib is up to date >> ... > > I did repeat the steps a few times ... did you also try a different mirror site? From magrawal at coba.usf.edu Wed Jun 4 17:08:50 2008 From: magrawal at coba.usf.edu (Manish Agrawal) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:08:50 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48458DCC.8050701@acm.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> <48458DCC.8050701@acm.org> Message-ID: Thanks very much, would it be possible to make an announcement here when the catalog gets fixed. Thanks Manish On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:30:36 -0400, Alessio wrote: > Agrawal, Manish wrote: >> I am running into a problem with CSWgrcypt. I tried installing nessus and gnome, but could not install either because of the ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt problem. I too have done pkg-get -U. > > the catalog will be fixed as soon as possible, try again tomorrow. > thanks > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From udippel at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 17:11:23 2008 From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:11:23 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> References: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> Message-ID: <4846B09B.9050403@gmail.com> Alessio wrote: > > did you also try a different mirror site? > Honestly: no. Uwe From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Jun 4 19:18:12 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:18:12 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Small bug in bin/checkpkg (with test case and patch) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4846CE54.3000303@acm.org> Michael van der Westhuizen wrote: > Hi All, > > I've found a small bug in bin/checkpkg which prevents pm_digestmd2 > from passing checkpkg. > > The test case looks like this: > ---- snip ---- > #!/bin/ksh -p > > software=pm_digestmd2 > > case $software in > *[A-Z]*) > echo "Existing method: FAIL" > ;; > *) > echo "Existing method: PASS" > ;; > esac this reports PASS in my environment, why should it FAIL? From r1mikey at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 19:51:30 2008 From: r1mikey at gmail.com (Michael van der Westhuizen) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:51:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Small bug in bin/checkpkg (with test case and patch) In-Reply-To: <4846CE54.3000303@acm.org> References: <4846CE54.3000303@acm.org> Message-ID: Hi Alessio, On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Alessio wrote: > Michael van der Westhuizen wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've found a small bug in bin/checkpkg which prevents pm_digestmd2 >> from passing checkpkg. [snip] > > this reports PASS in my environment, why should it FAIL? I don't know why it's failing :-/ It fails on a freshly installed Solaris 10 u5 zone. Michael From karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com Thu Jun 5 15:14:17 2008 From: karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com (Thiele, Karl D (Karl)) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:14:17 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Little help moving from Solaris 8 to 10 Message-ID: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB6260B4ADC25@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Been using Blastwave for ~ 2 years on Solaris 8 , but now moving to Solaris 10. I no longer have root, because our destops are going to be little more than an xterminal.... Someone else has to do Blastwave pkg-get and Blastwave software. In no way shape or form do I believe it is installed correctly. There is nothing in /opt/csw: kthiele at sbhomzzda12>ls ls> -la /opt/csw total 2 drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 512 May 23 17:58 ./ drwxr-xr-x 15 root sys 512 May 27 05:40 ../ Here is where y'all can help, since my associates do not blieve it is installed wrong. When pkg-get is installed this still occurs, according to Blastwave's "Howto get started" All the /opt/csw directories such as bin, etc, share, lib .... are created and pkg-get resides in bin.... I need someone from the mailing list to state that this is how Blastwave is installed on Solaris 10. Could they be installed else where? I do not think so, but correct me if I am wrong. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080605/9013b4f5/attachment-0001.html From blastwave at gmail.com Thu Jun 5 15:20:11 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:20:11 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Little help moving from Solaris 8 to 10 In-Reply-To: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB6260B4ADC25@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> References: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB6260B4ADC25@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Thiele, Karl D (Karl) wrote: > Been using Blastwave for ~ 2 years on Solaris 8 , but now moving to Solaris > 10. > > I no longer have root, because our destops are going to be little more than > an xterminal.... > > Someone else has to do Blastwave pkg-get and Blastwave software. In no way > shape or form do I believe it is installed correctly. > > There is nothing in /opt/csw: Well that is *completely* WRONG. Is that clear ? When the software packages are installed they go into /opt/csw and that is exactly what you will see in the HOWTO page also. Even more important is that you set your PATH in your .profile ( or .bashrc etc etc ) such that /opt/csw/bin and then /opt/csw/sbin are first in your PATH. In that way you get the up to date cdrtools and openssh and openssl and 1800+ other software titles. Does this help ? Next thing on my mind .. is how in God's green earth did anyone install the software into some other place other than /opt/csw and what the heck were they thinking ? Dennis From KPaskett at srlonline.org Thu Jun 5 21:36:50 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:36:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Catalog Still BROKEN (in a new way) Message-ID: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> The catalog has a new problem--Two entries for libqp. libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 CSWcommon|CSWosslrt|CSWisaexec|CSWzlib|CSWreadline none libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 CSWreadline|CSWosslrt|CSWzlib|CSWisaexec none pkg-get -i libpq fails with: Sorry, there are multiple versions possible Please specify one, in the following syntax pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 Then "pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02" fails with: ERROR: checksum libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does not match remote checksum (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) The often used suggestion to do a "pkg-get -U" does not help. - Keith From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 6 08:15:59 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:15:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Catalog Still BROKEN (in a new way) In-Reply-To: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> References: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <4848D61F.5010505@acm.org> The catalog should be finally fully fixed today... try again and let us know, thanks Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog has a new problem--Two entries for libqp. > > libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq > libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 > CSWcommon|CSWosslrt|CSWisaexec|CSWzlib|CSWreadline none > libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq > libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 > CSWreadline|CSWosslrt|CSWzlib|CSWisaexec none > > pkg-get -i libpq fails with: > Sorry, there are multiple versions possible > Please specify one, in the following syntax > pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 > pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 > > Then "pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02" fails with: > ERROR: checksum libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does > not match remote checksum > (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) > > The often used suggestion to do a "pkg-get -U" does not help. > > - Keith > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 6 15:39:06 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:39:06 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Catalog Still BROKEN (in a new way) In-Reply-To: <4848D61F.5010505@acm.org> References: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> <4848D61F.5010505@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Alessio wrote: > The catalog should be finally fully fixed today... > > try again and let us know, thanks > This is something that I do independantly I have scripts that checks the catalog. What it does is this : 1 ) first it generates an output file with the md5 hash of every file in a given directory The output file has a valid "package triplet" which is the filename and then the md5 hash and then the file size in bytes. 2 ) then it checks to see if there is 1 entry and only 1 entry in the catalog for each package triplet hash and filename and file size data entry 3 ) the output from (2) is expected to produce output where there are zero entries in the catalog for a given md5hash because files are often pre-released before the new catalog is pushed out. That is fine. However there should be no output where there are more than 1 entries in the catalog for a given md5 hash or triplet. 4 ) then I check in reverse to see if every entry in the catalog with a md5 hash also exists as a file ( or link ) in that directory. If there is anything missing there is a problem. Let me show you by example. Suppose we have the sparc architecture catalog for Solaris 8 and we cd to the correct directory where those packages and catalog and descriptions files reside. first I look where I am for files there are NOT packages. # pwd /CSW/unstable/sparc/5.8 # find . -type f | grep -v "CSW\.pkg" ./catalog.old ./descriptions.old ./descriptions ./catalog # I do a common sense check to see what number of signatures I should have from step (1) # find . -type f | grep -c "CSW\.pkg" 1805 I then generate the md5 hashs : # /root/bin/step1_gen_sig.sh Which results in : # wc -l /tmp/package_sigs.txt 1805 /tmp/package_sigs.txt Which has contents in three fields; filename, md5hash and filesize in bytes. That data, in simple ASCII fields separated by spaces is what I call a "package triplet". # grep gzip /tmp/package_sigs.txt gzip-1.3.12,REV=2008.01.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg 87e1279512a6f9def6be660b9325522e 355840 mod_gzip-1.3.26.1,REV=2003.07.07.a-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 63007d4df538ae8c68fe5050107703de 108088 pkgzip-1.2-all-CSW.pkg.gz 1a8ac5b5bf63c4d8d06c2b2b17df75cb 6284 Logic dictates that there should be an entry in the catalog with the exact same data, character for character and not just for the md5 hashs : # grep -c 1a8ac5b5bf63c4d8d06c2b2b17df75cb catalog 1 # grep -c "pkgzip-1.2-all-CSW.pkg.gz 1a8ac5b5bf63c4d8d06c2b2b17df75cb 6284" catalog 1 So there you see that the catalog has valid data ( at least for those three fields ) for the package pkgzip-1.2. So in step (2) we need to check for each and every package signature triplet. # /root/bin/step2_verify_sigs_in_catalog.sh # No output is perfect. That script ( step 2 ) has an intermediate step in which an output file is created. The output looks like so : # /tmp/sig_count.sh | head -600 | tail -4 1 68bb1fdb7723c0865530acd3bdd04e5c javasvn-1.4.5,REV=2007.11.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 516c3bc67165a33053604f4bcb5c0116 jbig2dec-0.9,REV=2007.05.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 903c3b5d4aac4e61da40e3cbd9ac409e jbigkit-1.6,REV=2007.05.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 b8e39bf5c8c679728eae3f35bf64ebcc jboss3-3.2.6,REV=2005.02.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz See that leading digit "1" there ? That means that the package triplet exists once and only once in the catalog and that is a good thing. Guess what, a zero is okay too. That just means that some package has been pushed out but it is not in the catalog yet. Next comes the reverse check in which each md5hash in the catalog, in fact, the package triplet data is checked to exist in the output from step (1). That ensures that every single entry in the catalog actually exists as a file. This also creates an intermediate output file that looks like so : # /tmp/sigger.sh | head -600 | tail -4 1 68bb1fdb7723c0865530acd3bdd04e5c javasvn-1.4.5,REV=2007.11.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 516c3bc67165a33053604f4bcb5c0116 jbig2dec-0.9,REV=2007.05.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 903c3b5d4aac4e61da40e3cbd9ac409e jbigkit-1.6,REV=2007.05.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 b8e39bf5c8c679728eae3f35bf64ebcc jboss3-3.2.6,REV=2005.02.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz That should look similar, exactly, to the above data. Again the leading digit "1" shows me that the entries in the catalog actually exist as rela package files. Once and once only. Any other result would be flagged. # /root/bin/step3_verify_sigs_in_catalog_exist_as_files.sh # No output .. that is a perfect catalog. I think that is a pretty stringent test of the catalog and do you think I missed anything? Dennis From robert at gslt.hum.gu.se Tue Jun 10 09:49:58 2008 From: robert at gslt.hum.gu.se (Robert Andersson) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:49:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <4846B09B.9050403@gmail.com> References: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> <4846B09B.9050403@gmail.com> Message-ID: <18510.12838.672960.450265@mozart.gslt.hum.gu.se> Hello! >>>>> "UD" == Uwe Dippel writes: UD> Alessio wrote: >> >> did you also try a different mirror site? >> UD> Honestly: no. I can second this checksum problem with the glib2 packag, and I have tried both the primary site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable and the danish site http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/csw/unstable In addition, when running pkg-get [available|compare] I get glib2 listed twice, as well as the libpq package... yours, /robert -- Systems Administrator & IT-Coordinator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology Nordic Graduate School of Language Technology From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Tue Jun 10 20:14:40 2008 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:14:40 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem Message-ID: <11a73afd29f.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Da: robert at gslt.hum.gu.se Data: 10-giu-2008 9.49 A: "questions and discussions" Ogg: Re: [csw-users] glib2- problem Hello! > In addition, when running pkg-get [available|compare] I get glib2 > listed twice, as well as the libpq package... i don't see these problems: bash-3.00# pkg-get -U Getting catalog... --2008-06-10 20:09:28-- http://ibiblio. org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 357395 (349K) [text/plain] Saving to: `catalog' 100% [=======================================>] 357,395 98.3K/s in 4.2 s 2008-06-10 20:09:33 (82.4 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [357395/357395] Stripping off catalog signature without verifying Updating catalog file /var/pkg-get/catalog-ibiblio.org updated --2008-06-10 20:09:33-- http: //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/descriptions Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152. 46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 96643 (94K) [text/plain] Saving to: `descriptions' 100% [=======================================>] 96,643 52.2K/s in 1.8 s 2008-06-10 20:09:35 (52.2 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [96643/96643] Updated description file bash-3.00# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U bash-3.00# pkg-get compare |grep glib2 glib2 2.16.3 SAME bash-3.00# can you send the output of you commands? From robert at gslt.hum.gu.se Wed Jun 11 15:20:23 2008 From: robert at gslt.hum.gu.se (Robert Andersson) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:20:23 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <11a73afd29f.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <11a73afd29f.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <18511.53527.715842.148708@mozart.gslt.hum.gu.se> After yet another "pkg-get -U" this afternoon our problems seem to have vanished. Maybe they were related to the problems described in a previous thread about the catalog being broken...? Anyway, thank you for listening, /robert >>>>> "AC" == Alessio Cervellin writes: AC> i don't see these problems: AC> bash-3.00# pkg-get -U AC> Getting AC> catalog... AC> --2008-06-10 20:09:28-- http://ibiblio. AC> org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog AC> Resolving AC> ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 AC> Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... AC> connected. AC> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK AC> Length: AC> 357395 (349K) [text/plain] AC> Saving to: `catalog' AC> 100% AC> [=======================================>] 357,395 98.3K/s in 4.2 AC> s AC> 2008-06-10 20:09:33 (82.4 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [357395/357395] AC> Stripping off catalog signature without verifying AC> Updating catalog file AC> /var/pkg-get/catalog-ibiblio.org updated AC> --2008-06-10 20:09:33-- http: AC> //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/descriptions AC> Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 AC> Connecting to ibiblio.org|152. AC> 46.7.80|:80... connected. AC> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 AC> OK AC> Length: 96643 (94K) [text/plain] AC> Saving to: `descriptions' AC> 100% AC> [=======================================>] 96,643 52.2K/s in 1.8 AC> s AC> 2008-06-10 20:09:35 (52.2 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [96643/96643] AC> Updated description file AC> bash-3.00# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U AC> bash-3.00# AC> pkg-get compare |grep glib2 AC> glib2 AC> 2.16.3 SAME AC> bash-3.00# -- Systems Administrator & IT-Coordinator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology Nordic Graduate School of Language Technology From blastwave at gmail.com Thu Jun 12 16:46:27 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:46:27 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] RFE for pkg-get Message-ID: While on the phone with someone they were confused by these lines in the pkg-get.conf file : # Solaris 10: If you wish to limit pkg-get to installing packages # ONLY to the global zone, then uncomment this line PKGADDFLAGS=-G The line that says "uncomment this line" should read # ONLY to the global zone, then uncomment this next line believe it or not .. I can't make this stuff up. Dennis From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Thu Jun 12 18:25:36 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:25:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? Message-ID: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i have to migrate nis to ldap, and forced to do it with openldap. I installed CSWoldap, but trying to follow the README, i'm unable to understand what files are really missing or not? Is this package ready for solaris? On the net, i found few documents about solaris 8 or 9, but are they applicable to 10? is it normal that slapd.conf contains just: include /opt/csw/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema ? what about DUAConfgProfile.schema and solaris.schema? (*) thanks in advance for help or pointers, gerard (*) http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Installing%20and%20configuring%20OpenLDAP%20for%20Solaris9.htm From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Jun 12 20:26:02 2008 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:26:02 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? In-Reply-To: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> G?rard Henry wrote: > hello all, > i have to migrate nis to ldap, and forced to do it with openldap. Things could be worse, you might be forced to use eDirectory or AD! > I installed CSWoldap, but trying to follow the README, i'm unable to > understand what files are really missing or not? > Is this package ready for solaris? It wouldn't be in the repository if it wasn't ready ;-). > On the net, i found few documents about solaris 8 or 9, but are they > applicable to 10? > is it normal that slapd.conf contains just: > include /opt/csw/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema > ? Only including the core.schema is pretty normal for the default installation as it's required. It won't give you all the need for functional posix accounts, you'll need rfc2307bis.schema for that plus any schema's which it requires. > what about DUAConfgProfile.schema and solaris.schema? (*) DUAConfigProfile.schema is really only need if you plan on configuring your Solaris clients with ldapclient and a profile stored in the directory. This isn't required though it does simplify things. solaris.schema may or may not be used but it won't hurt to load it. > > (*) > http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Installing%20and%20configuring%20OpenLDAP%20for%20Solaris9.htm Gary's ldap pages are a great resource, be sure to read them all. Also check out PADL's Migration Tools as they will greatly simplify life, http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html. As I recall I needed to modify them a bit in order to properly create the ldif's for import but it was trivial. I did use some nis command to dump the tables to flat files but it was 2 years ago and I don't recall which one. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darinper at cognigencorp.com From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Jun 13 07:05:56 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:05:56 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? In-Reply-To: <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> References: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <48520034.6090301@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Darin Perusich wrote: > >> (*) >> http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Installing%20and%20configuring%20OpenLDAP%20for%20Solaris9.htm > > Gary's ldap pages are a great resource, be sure to read them all. > thanks for all reply. I've started reading gary's document, it's very helpful. A new question, i got this message: Jun 12 18:04:14 annu1 slapd[22939]: [ID 816447 local4.error] warning: cannot open /opt/csw/etc/hosts.deny: No such file or directory why does slapd need the use of tcpwrappers? aren't access control in slapd.conf sufficient? gerard From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 13 13:35:55 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:35:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed Message-ID: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> finally evince has been fixed. latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 13 14:37:24 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:37:24 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: > finally evince has been fixed. > latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. thanks be to God and you ... Dennis From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 13 14:41:29 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:41:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: <48526AF9.2010003@acm.org> Dennis Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: >> finally evince has been fixed. >> latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing >> >> please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. > > thanks be to God cool, i didn't know he was involved in the gtk2 issues! From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Fri Jun 13 14:46:00 2008 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:46:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? In-Reply-To: <48520034.6090301@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> <48520034.6090301@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <48526C08.6080001@cognigencorp.com> G?rard Henry wrote: > A new question, i got this message: > Jun 12 18:04:14 annu1 slapd[22939]: [ID 816447 local4.error] warning: > cannot open /opt/csw/etc/hosts.deny: No such file or directory > > why does slapd need the use of tcpwrappers? aren't access control in > slapd.conf sufficient? > TCPwrappers are the preferred method for denying/allowing access to services, by using them you can control access before accessing said service. LDAP access controls are for the ldap access itself, not the service. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darinper at cognigencorp.com From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 13 15:59:24 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:59:24 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48526AF9.2010003@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> <48526AF9.2010003@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Alessio wrote: > Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: >>> finally evince has been fixed. >>> latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing >>> >>> please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. >> >> thanks be to God > > cool, i didn't know he was involved in the gtk2 issues! only if people ask .. .nicely dc From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 13 17:57:54 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:57:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: > finally evince has been fixed. > latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. where is this puppy ? WARNING: The package "" is a prerequisite package and should be installed. Dennis From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 13 18:01:35 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:01:35 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: <485299DF.7050406@acm.org> Dennis Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: >> finally evince has been fixed. >> latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing >> >> please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. > > where is this puppy ? > > WARNING: > The package "" is a prerequisite > package and should be installed. pkg-get -i shared_mime_info (it has been always there, nothing new) From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Jun 14 03:54:26 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:54:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: > finally evince has been fixed. > latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. working perfectly on x86 thus far dc From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:20:12 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:50:12 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080615175012.00005131@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Excellent work! Good to have evince back. Only thing that crops up when running is this: [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ evince (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 2884: assertion `GTK_IS_WI DGET (widget)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1742: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 2884: assertion `GTK_IS_WI DGET (widget)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1742: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 2884: assertion `GTK_IS_WI DGET (widget)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1742: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed But it doesn't core anymore. Are these just warnings or should I take them seriously? Best wishes, h -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:24:36 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:54:36 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] Latest gcalctool problems... Message-ID: <20080615175436.0000262c@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Hi! Running the latest gcalctool here: [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep gcalctool gcalctool 5.21.91 SAME Works just fine, but when I do a subtraction, any, then, if the result is a floating point number, it displays a tab instead of a decimal point. I.e. the result is displayed something like this: 28 3 instead of 28.3 . Can anyone advise as to what may be causing this? Thanks, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:25:50 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:55:50 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] python modules out of sync... again... Message-ID: <20080615175550.00003f90@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ meld Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/meld", line 93, in import meldapp File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/meldapp.py", line 28, in import prefs File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/prefs.py", line 52, in import gconf ImportError: No module named gconf This happened before, when python was upgraded and the corresponding modules weren't refreshed. Just thought I'd bring that to everyone's attention. (Am I the only one using meld? ;-) ) Best wishes, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:32:27 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:02:27 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] Issues with xterm since last refresh... (Various) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080615180227.00003ba6@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> > I threw a massive pile of options at it thus : > > $ /opt/csw/bin/xterm +ah -b 4 -cr white -j -ls -ms white +mb -rw -aw > -s -sb +si -sk -sl 8192 +t -tn vt100 -vb -wf -T Solaris\ 8\ \:\ New\ > XTerm -bw 4 -bg black -bd red -fg green -fn > -adobe-courier-medium-r-normal--25-180-100-100-m-150-iso8859-1 > > ... and then scrolled up and down like mad and the Page_Up and Page_Dn > keys works perfectly for me. i tried it with your options and whilst the whole thing looks pretty swell, PgUp / PgDn don't work for me still. > What are you running? Solaris 8 ? 9 ? 10 ? on CDE ? GNOME ? XFCE ? SXCE build 86. WindowMaker. Worked flawlessly before 228. > Your original email mentioned an error in xterm trying to obtain an > input method. Do you have any locales or LC_* or LANG environment > variables specified that's triggering an attempt to hook up an X > Input Method you might not have available on your system? If > nothing's changed on your system other than xterm, it could be that > your older xterm ignored these things and the newer one pays > attention. :-) [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ env | grep LC [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ env | grep LANG LANG=C [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ env | grep XT XTERM_SHELL=/opt/csw/bin/bash XTERM_LOCALE=C XTERM_VERSION=XTerm(235) > I suggest clearing your environment of everything that looks like a > locale and see if the error persists. > i think it's a locale problem too. > i suggest to unset any locale environment variable and/or use the > specific variable $XTERM_LOCALE I unset LANG, started an xterm, checked the env, there's no locale set whatsoever except for the three XTERM variables above. Still no PgUp / PgDn. Thanks for any further suggestions you may have. Best wishes, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Jun 15 15:36:36 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:36:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <20080615175012.00005131@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> References: <20080615175012.00005131@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: <48551AE4.9060703@acm.org> S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote: > Excellent work! Good to have evince back. > > Only thing that crops up when running is this: > > [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ evince > > (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: > assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > > But it doesn't core anymore. > > Are these just warnings or should I take them seriously? as far as i know they are harmless and they are common to other programs depending on gtk2 and glib2 From zhihengz at gmail.com Wed Jun 18 20:20:46 2008 From: zhihengz at gmail.com (Jason Zhang) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:20:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] vncserver + CSWGnome Message-ID: <1213813246.16595.16.camel@mars.intervoice.int> Hi, Anybody has experience on using CSWGnome with vncserver in solaris 10 sparc ? I installed the lateste solaris 10 on Sun-Fire-V210: ------------------------------ bash-3.00$ uname -a SunOS firebird 5.10 Generic_127127-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210 ------------------------------- Followed instruction on http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html to install CSWgnome The vncserver comes with Solaris default installation and it is RealVNC 4.0 ------------------------------ -bash-3.00$ which vncserver /usr/bin/vncserver ------------------------------ If I am using this xstartup: ------------------------------ -bash-3.00$ more xstartup.jds #!/bin/sh exec /usr/bin/gnome-session ------------------------------ I can connect to the box and get nice JDS gnome desktop. but if I copy /etc/dt/config/Xinitrc.CSWgnome as my xstartup, I will get message in log file when starting vncserver: ------------------------------ -bash-3.00$ tail firebird\:1.log Wed Jun 18 13:16:57 2008 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 Starting CSW GNOME 2.14 X_mkdir: Not owner X_mkdir: Not owner SESSION_MANAGER=local/firebird:/tmp/.ICE-unix/814,inet6/firebird:32795,inet/firebird:32796 Window manager warning: 0 stored in GConf key /apps/metacity/general/num_workspaces is not a reasonable number of workspaces, current maximum is 36 Window manager warning: Log level 32: could not find XKB extension. ------------------------------ and when I login using vncviewer, there is no gnome panel at all, only a desktop with Computer, Trash, Desktop Overview and StarOffice 8. Anything went wrong ? Or CSWGnome does not work with vnc ? Thanks for your advice! --Jason From chris at goodshow.net Sun Jun 22 17:14:04 2008 From: chris at goodshow.net (Chris Bellomy) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:14:04 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? Message-ID: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! Are archives of previous versions of CSW packages kept anywhere? If so, where? If not, might anyone have an older version of the cyrus-imap package lying around? Thanks, Chris Bellomy chris at goodshow.net From dam at blastwave.org Sun Jun 22 17:53:07 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:53:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? In-Reply-To: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> References: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> Message-ID: <7E976A00-BA48-433F-B5E8-B222738FDF9C@blastwave.org> Hi Chris, Am 22.06.2008 um 17:14 schrieb Chris Bellomy: > I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been > unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, > it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server > to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! > > Are archives of previous versions of CSW packages kept anywhere? Old versions are available from > If so, where? If not, might anyone have an older version of the > cyrus-imap package lying around? My personal archive at doesn't go back as far, but also has stable/ archived. Best regards -- Dagobert Michelsen From william at wbonnet.net Sun Jun 22 18:30:29 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:30:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing JBoss 4.2.2-GA is available Message-ID: <485E7E25.6040907@wbonnet.net> Hi all JBoss Application server is now available from testing. I have update the previously unmaintained package. SMF support is included. Please send me your feedbacks :) cheers, W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Sun Jun 22 19:38:30 2008 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:38:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? In-Reply-To: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> References: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> Message-ID: <485E8E16.1050607@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Chris Bellomy a ?crit : > I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been > unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, > it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server > to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! A userspace application, not kernel related at all, which causes a kernel panic ? It's a bit surprising. Have you more information about this problem to help understand how cyrus could be responsible for it ? Yann From chris at goodshow.net Sun Jun 22 21:25:55 2008 From: chris at goodshow.net (Chris Bellomy) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:25:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? In-Reply-To: <485E8E16.1050607@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> <485E8E16.1050607@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <9CFBE1D4-BB53-4676-B748-42E94F78D0E7@goodshow.net> On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Yann Rouillard wrote: > Chris Bellomy a ?crit : >> I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been >> unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, >> it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server >> to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! > > A userspace application, not kernel related at all, which causes a > kernel panic ? > It's a bit surprising. Have you more information about this problem to > help understand how cyrus could be responsible for it ? It's been an ordeal to track down, but I got on console yesterday and first disabled exim at boot time. The server would come up stable. Then I would start exim, and a few seconds later I'd watch the kernel panic scroll across the screen. Unfortunately it scrolls across so fast that I couldn't begin to write any of the info down. After it came back up again, I ran exim -q -v to watch the queue runner process the queue. I saw it process the full LMTP handshake up to DATA, at which point the server rebooted again. Now this is only one data point, which is flimsy of course, but this machine has rebooted several times over the last few weeks, but never when I had message delivery disabled. If this weren't the case, I'd be chasing physical layer issues, as I'm as mystified by how a user application could do this as you seem to be. FWIW, this is OpenSolaris x86, SNV 67, with ZFS everywhere. My best guess how cyrus could be causing this would be that it may be tickling a ZFS bug in our relatively old version of Solaris. To that end, I'm building out a new box tomorrow with the latest Solaris rev and moving mail to it ASAP. Thoughts/feedback are very welcome. cb From laurent at opensolaris.org Mon Jun 23 17:07:18 2008 From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:07:18 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch Message-ID: <485FBC26.1020406@opensolaris.org> Hi all, I'm having some issues with emacs, from the stable branch. When trying to save, it crashes with the following d-bus error: emacs process 15522: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": No such file or directory See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace Fatal error (6)Abort There is not even a /opt/csw/var/lib directory, so I don't understand. Does it have anything to do with the many unstable GNOME packages that crept in the stable branch? I thought that stable meant just that, avoiding the issues of the bleeding edge development packages? TIA, Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Mon Jun 23 17:12:34 2008 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:12:34 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch Message-ID: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> > read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": No it was a known bug of the pkg (alreday fixed in unstable i guess). you can fix it this way: - if a file named /var/lib/dbus/machine-id exists in you machine, symlink it to /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id - if it does not exist, create it using /opt/csw/bin/dbus-uuidgen From laurent at opensolaris.org Mon Jun 23 17:42:31 2008 From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:42:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch In-Reply-To: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> Alessio Cervellin a ?crit : >> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": > No > > it was a known bug of the pkg (alreday fixed in unstable i guess). > you can fix it this way: > - if a file named /var/lib/dbus/machine-id > exists in you machine, symlink it to /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id > - > if it does not exist, create it using /opt/csw/bin/dbus-uuidgen Thanks a lot, this helps me find that CSWdbus was actually missing. I had just moved from unstable to stable, because there were some very annoying issues with glib 2.16, and it seems that in the process of reverting some packages to older versions, I lost dbus. Unstable is really a mess those days, I got issues with that branch far too often. After opening bugs, I was told to just use stable to fix them. Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | From william at wbonnet.net Mon Jun 23 23:03:07 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:03:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch In-Reply-To: <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> References: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> Message-ID: <48600F8B.7000406@wbonnet.net> Salut Laurent > Alessio Cervellin a ?crit : > >>> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": >>> >> No >> >> it was a known bug of the pkg (alreday fixed in unstable i guess). >> you can fix it this way: >> - if a file named /var/lib/dbus/machine-id >> exists in you machine, symlink it to /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id >> - >> if it does not exist, create it using /opt/csw/bin/dbus-uuidgen >> > > Thanks a lot, this helps me find that CSWdbus was actually missing. I > had just moved from unstable to stable, because there were some very > annoying issues with glib 2.16, and it seems that in the process of > reverting some packages to older versions, I lost dbus. > > Unstable is really a mess those days, I got issues with that branch far > too often. After opening bugs, I was told to just use stable to fix them. > > Bon visiblement Alessio t'as aid?. Il semble que tu ai eu un petit probl?me avec DBus ... on se demande ce que fous le maintainer franchement ! C'est limite pas test? ce truc :( Humm... ah tien c'est bete c'est moi le maintainer :) Si tu as d'autres ennuis, h?sites pas ? me faire signe. Les r?sultats seront ?videment diffus?s sur la liste d?s que ce sera tomb? en marche. En tout cas je confirme ce que dit Alessio, c'etait d?j? rapport? et corrig?. Mais il doit en rester d'autres :( amicalement W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Mon Jun 23 23:10:39 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:10:39 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch In-Reply-To: <48600F8B.7000406@wbonnet.net> References: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> <48600F8B.7000406@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <4860114F.5020206@wbonnet.net> Hi all > Bon visiblement Alessio t'as aid?. Il semble que tu ai eu un petit > probl?me avec DBus ... on se demande ce que fous le maintainer > franchement ! C'est limite pas test? ce truc :( > > Humm... ah tien c'est bete c'est moi le maintainer :) > > Si tu as d'autres ennuis, h?sites pas ? me faire signe. Les r?sultats > seront ?videment diffus?s sur la liste d?s que ce sera tomb? en > marche. En tout cas je confirme ce que dit Alessio, c'etait d?j? > rapport? et corrig?. Mais il doit en rester d'autres :( > > amicalement > W. > ok now that is official i do HATE Thunderbird ! :D By the way i do apologize to you all for sending this "French written email" to you all when i was thinking to send it only to Laurent ... cheers, W. PS: This email also says in French, that DBus package may hide some other hidden bugs, as any other package standing in testing. So don't hesitate to contact the list, to the maintainer or to the bugtracker if you undercover any issues. I'll try to fix them as soom as possible. PS2: once again... i do apologize ! -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From pgress at optonline.net Tue Jun 24 02:55:20 2008 From: pgress at optonline.net (Paul Gress) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:55:20 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with pkgadd Message-ID: <486045F8.5020709@optonline.net> Hi all, I have sxce b91 install on my laptop. I am having trouble getting pkg-get to install any software. It seems to be related to pkgadd. This is what I get from the command line: # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i common WARNING: gpg not found No existing install of CSWcommon found. Installing... Pre-existing local file common-1.4.6,REV=2008.04.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Hmmm. Retrying with different archive offset...28 blocks Processing package instance from common - common files and dirs for CSW packages(i386) 1.4.6,REV=2008.04.28 http://www.blastwave.org/ packaged for CSW by Philip Brown ## Executing checkinstall script. /var/tmp//installv8aacc/checkinstallz8aacc: test: argument expected pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully Installation of failed. No changes were made to the system. ERROR: could not add CSWcommon. # I have done the above command with truss, and attached the file. I gzipped it to reducer the size. The only relevant text I get from the truss output is: stat64("/var/pkg-get/downloads/CSWcommon", 0x0808EFC8) = 0 stat64("CSWcommon/install/depend", 0x0808EFC8) Err#2 ENOENT stat64("/var/pkg-get/pkgask/CSWcommon", 0x0808EFC8) Err#2 ENOENT Maybe somebody can see something better than me. Any help in solving this would be appreciated. Paul -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: truss_pkg-get_csw.txt.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 579 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080623/6cf7b2d3/attachment-0001.bin From pgress at optonline.net Tue Jun 24 03:27:43 2008 From: pgress at optonline.net (Paul Gress) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:27:43 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with pkgadd In-Reply-To: <486045F8.5020709@optonline.net> References: <486045F8.5020709@optonline.net> Message-ID: <48604D8F.9090707@optonline.net> OK, I'm replying to myself. I solved the problem. It wasn't related to pkgadd because I was able to install other programs from SFW with pkgadd. It was that I was testing changing my hostid, done in my /etc/rc2.d directory at S05 level (obviously not soon enough) was confusing pkg-get. When I removed the startup script and rebooted, I had no problem using pkg-get at all. Paul From laurent at opensolaris.org Tue Jun 24 10:13:16 2008 From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:13:16 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] emacs_gtk crashes when opening Save As dialog Message-ID: <4860AC9C.5070200@opensolaris.org> Hello all, I'm having a lot of trouble with emacs_gtk. It starts fine, but it crashes one time out of 3 when opening the Save As dialog. Sometimes the dialog appears, I can cancel, and on the next tries it crashes as soon as I select Save As. Or it crashed right after displaying the pop up. The errors are not always the same: $ emacs Fatal error (10)Bus Error $ /opt/csw/bin/emacs Fatal error (11)Segmentation Fault (core dumped) This happens both on Solaris 9 SPARC not recently patched, and on Solaris 10 x86 patched 2 weeks ago. Since I went from unstable to stable, some packages ar slightly more recent, but I doubt they're the cause of the problem: /opt/csw/share/emacs]# pkg-get -c | grep -v 'Not installed' | grep -v SAME WARNING: gpg not found # (From site http://blastwave.solaris-fr.org/stable ) software localrev remoterev aalib 1.4.0,REV=2008.04.13_rev=rc5 1.4.0,REV=2004.10.15_rev=rc5 ghostscript 8.62,REV=2008.04.15 8.61 libgcrypt 1.4.1,REV=2008.05.27 1.4.0 openssl 0.9.8g,REV=2008.04.30_rev=g 0.9.8g,REV=2008.03.22_rev=g perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 5.8.8,REV=2007.10.05 samba_lib 3.0.23,REV=2006.08.09b 3.0.22,REV=2006.06.21 screen 4.0.3,REV=2008.04.30 4.0.2,REV=2005.11.02 Thanks for any help. Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | From binod3 at gmail.com Wed Jun 25 20:30:28 2008 From: binod3 at gmail.com (Binod) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:30:28 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] About subversion 1.5 Message-ID: <111cdbc80806251130h5a9cd419g7207881bad24ba91@mail.gmail.com> Hi Guys, Is Blastwave planning to add subversion 1.5 version which just got out, anytime soon ? I am using 1.4.3 downloaded from csw and I will also prefer to get 1.5 version once it is available. I know its not even out there for download yet even on the collabnet, but will we be adding it once it is available? I would like to play with 1.5 version of subversion. Just wanted to see if it is something possible or not? Thanks, Binod -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080625/557b1d01/attachment.html From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Jun 25 20:40:41 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:40:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] About subversion 1.5 In-Reply-To: <111cdbc80806251130h5a9cd419g7207881bad24ba91@mail.gmail.com> References: <111cdbc80806251130h5a9cd419g7207881bad24ba91@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e30806251140l4da10b25ia1726598d1af3fef@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Binod wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Is Blastwave planning to add subversion 1.5 version which just got out, > anytime soon ? > > I am using 1.4.3 downloaded from csw and I will also prefer to get 1.5 > version once it is available. I know its not even out there for download yet > even on the collabnet, but will we be adding it once it is available? > > I would like to play with 1.5 version of subversion. > > Just wanted to see if it is something possible or not? Unfortunately subversion has no active maintainer at the moment. If you're up to it, feel free to sign up as a maintainer and build it. -- Arnold Schwarzenegger - "I have a love interest in every one of my films - a gun." From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Jun 28 19:20:39 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:20:39 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] xterm on OpenSolaris dependency issue Message-ID: I know that the xterm package was never intended to run on OpenSolaris but here is the data just in case we can fix it up or recompile for OpenSolaris $ uname -a SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc $ cat /etc/release OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_86_rc3 X86 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 26 April 2008 $ ldd /opt/csw/bin/xterm libXft.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libXft.so.2 libfreetype.so.6 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libfreetype.so.6 libz.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libz.so libXrender.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libXrender.so.1 libX11.so.4 => /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4 libfontconfig.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libfontconfig.so.1 libXaw.so.5 => (file not found) libXmu.so.4 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXmu.so.4 libXext.so.0 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0 libXt.so.4 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4 libXt.so.4 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) libXt.so.4 (SUNWprivate) => (version not found) libSM.so.6 => /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6 libICE.so.6 => /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6 libcurses.so.1 => /lib/libcurses.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libz.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) libXau.so.6 => /usr/X11/lib/libXau.so.6 libiconv.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libiconv.so.2 libexpat.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libexpat.so.0 libXmuu.so.1 => /usr/X11/lib/libXmuu.so.1 libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libmd.so.1 => /lib/libmd.so.1 libscf.so.1 => /lib/libscf.so.1 libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 libXevie.so.1 => /usr/X11/lib/libXevie.so.1 libXss.so.1 => /usr/X11/lib/libXss.so.1 Note the annoying libXt.so.4 lib there that is found in /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4 My attempt to run xterm and diplay remotely results in $ ld.so.1: xterm86: fatal: libXaw.so.5: open failed: No such file or directory [1] + Killed /opt/csw/bin/xterm +ah -b 4 -cr yellow -j -ls -ms white +mb -rw -aw -s -sb +si -sk -sl 2048 +t -tn vt100 -vb -wf -T aequitas -bw 4 -bg black -bd red -fg green -display mercury:0 & I'll hook up an OpenSolaris based build box .. shortly. I already have it in the rack but I can not netboot the os200805 release. Dennis From dam at blastwave.org Mon Jun 30 16:03:43 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:03:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP and RootDSE-Patch for Solaris 8 Client Message-ID: Hi Alex, I have a problem with OpenLDAP 2.3.38 and using Solaris 8 7/03 as LDAP client: > bopack8# ldapclient -i -v \ > -a simple \ > -D cn=proxyagent,ou=profile,dc=baltic-online,dc=de -w xxxxxxx \ > -b dc=baltic-online,dc=de \ > -B 'auto_home:(ou=auto.home,dc=baltic-online,dc=de)' \ > -B 'auto_master:(automountMapName=auto.master,dc=baltic- > online,dc=de)' \ > ldap.baltic-online.de > parsing -a option > auth set to NS_LDAP_AUTH_SIMPLE needpwd 1 > parsing -D option > parsing -w option > parsing -b option > parsing -B option > parsing -B option > v1__findDN: begins > v1__findDN: calling __ns_ldap_default_config() > found 0 namingcontexts > Cannot find the rootDN This looks like a missing SOLARISROOTDSE, however, this has been removed as this should no longer be necessary. Any idea of what is going wrong here? Thanks! -- Dago From chaljan at gmail.com Mon Jun 2 19:32:54 2008 From: chaljan at gmail.com (Jan Chaloupecky) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:32:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] bug in CSWphp5 ? In-Reply-To: <4840675F.6030805@acm.org> References: <8ab325f80805300204g7057b5a9kff7e52efe88976dc@mail.gmail.com> <4840675F.6030805@acm.org> Message-ID: <8ab325f80806021032x78d5d25dyfada978558627d19@mail.gmail.com> ok thanks, regards Jan. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Alessio wrote: > Jan Chaloupecky wrote: > >> I talked about this in the #pear IRC channel and I was told that if >> the Structure package is missing the installation is likely broken. >> The quick solution I use is just to unpack the Structure directory >> from the Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz to the php include path >> (include_path='/opt/csw/php5/lib/php') which fixes the issue but it's >> not really a clean solution. >> >> Do you confirm this misconfiguration ? > > well, it seems you are right... i just opened a bug on mantis > http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0002907 > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From KPaskett at srlonline.org Mon Jun 2 21:29:52 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:29:52 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? Message-ID: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> The catalog seems to be out of date. Recent packages on the web site shows: May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz While: # pkg-get -c postfix WARNING: gpg not found # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) software localrev remoterev postfix [Not installed] 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 And pkg-get -i postfix fails: Trying http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz --2008-06-02 13:29:03-- http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2008-06-02 13:29:04 ERROR 404: Not Found. Error downloading http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz (Perhaps you need to update your catalog?) postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz: No such file or directory - Keith From KPaskett at srlonline.org Mon Jun 2 21:59:16 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:59:16 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> Before someone asks, I did run 'pkg-get -U' first. - Keith Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz > > While: > > # pkg-get -c postfix > WARNING: gpg not found > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) > software localrev remoterev > postfix [Not installed] 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 > > And pkg-get -i postfix fails: > > Trying > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > --2008-06-02 13:29:03-- > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 > Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > 2008-06-02 13:29:04 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > Error downloading > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > (Perhaps you need to update your catalog?) > postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz: No such file or > directory > > - Keith > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From blastwave at gmail.com Mon Jun 2 22:39:56 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:39:56 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz try a faster mirror http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Dennis From KPaskett at srlonline.org Mon Jun 2 23:08:13 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:08:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <4844613D.2060108@srlonline.org> Dennis Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Keith Paskett wrote: > >> The catalog seems to be out of date. >> >> Recent packages on the web site shows: >> May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz >> > > try a faster mirror > > http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > Yes. That works. The problem isn't that the new postfix package isn't there. The problem is that the latest catalog entry for postfix is pointing to the older version (postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz). - Keith From KPaskett at srlonline.org Tue Jun 3 01:05:11 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:05:11 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <48447CA7.5050701@srlonline.org> Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz > It turns out the catalog really is BROKEN at least for postfix. On the three server's I've tried (mirrors.usc.edu, ibiblio.org, and blastwave.network.com), The postfix package on the server is 2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28, but the catalog entry is postfix 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 - Keith From magrawal at coba.usf.edu Tue Jun 3 17:20:32 2008 From: magrawal at coba.usf.edu (Agrawal, Manish) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:20:32 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> Message-ID: I am running into a problem with CSWgrcypt. I tried installing nessus and gnome, but could not install either because of the ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt problem. I too have done pkg-get -U. Trying to install dependancy gtk2 No existing install of CSWgtk2 found. Installing... Pre-existing local file gtk2-2.12.3-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgtk2 Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i gtk2 to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWgtk2 failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgconf2 Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i gconf2 to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWgconf2 failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWbluefish Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i bluefish to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWbluefish failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgnome Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i gnome to (re)install Thanks Manish -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+magrawal=coba.usf.edu at lists.blastwave.org on behalf of Keith Paskett Sent: Mon 6/2/2008 3:59 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] catalog out of date? Before someone asks, I did run 'pkg-get -U' first. - Keith Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog seems to be out of date. > > Recent packages on the web site shows: > May 29 21:56 postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.05.28-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz > > While: > > # pkg-get -c postfix > WARNING: gpg not found > # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) > software localrev remoterev > postfix [Not installed] 2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02 > > And pkg-get -i postfix fails: > > Trying > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > --2008-06-02 13:29:03-- > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 > Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > 2008-06-02 13:29:04 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > Error downloading > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > (Perhaps you need to update your catalog?) > postfix-2.4.6,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz: No such file or > directory > > - Keith > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 3877 bytes Desc: not available URL: From a.cervellin at acm.org Tue Jun 3 20:30:36 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:30:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <48458DCC.8050701@acm.org> Agrawal, Manish wrote: > I am running into a problem with CSWgrcypt. I tried installing nessus and gnome, but could not install either because of the ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt problem. I too have done pkg-get -U. the catalog will be fixed as soon as possible, try again tomorrow. thanks From r1mikey at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 11:55:52 2008 From: r1mikey at gmail.com (Michael van der Westhuizen) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:55:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Small bug in bin/checkpkg (with test case and patch) Message-ID: Hi All, I've found a small bug in bin/checkpkg which prevents pm_digestmd2 from passing checkpkg. The test case looks like this: ---- snip ---- #!/bin/ksh -p software=pm_digestmd2 case $software in *[A-Z]*) echo "Existing method: FAIL" ;; *) echo "Existing method: PASS" ;; esac lcsoftware=`echo $software | /usr/bin/tr "[A-Z]" "[a-z]"` if [ x"${lcsoftware}" != x"${software}" ]; then echo "New method: FAIL" else echo "New method: PASS" fi ---- snip ---- Run on my Solaris 10 u5 box this prints: [michael at pkgbld csw]$ ~/testbug.ksh Existing method: FAIL New method: PASS A patch for checkpkg follows: [michael at pkgbld csw]$ svn diff bin/checkpkg Index: bin/checkpkg =================================================================== --- bin/checkpkg (revision 2141) +++ bin/checkpkg (working copy) @@ -142,12 +142,12 @@ basedir=`sed -n 's/^BASEDIR=//p' $TMPFILE` pkgarch=`sed -n 's/^ARCH=//p' $TMPFILE|head -1` -case $software in - *[A-Z]*) +lcsoftware=`echo $software | /usr/bin/tr "[A-Z]" "[a-z]"` + +if [ x"${lcsoftware}" != x"${software}" ]; then echo ERROR: $software must be all lowercase exit 1 - ;; -esac +fi case `basename $f` in ${software}-${version}-*) Michael From r1mikey at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 11:58:29 2008 From: r1mikey at gmail.com (Michael van der Westhuizen) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:58:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] bin/mkpackage and cleaning the package spool (patch) Message-ID: Hi, When building packages as a user, the package spool cleanup portion of bin/mkpackage requires user input when removing files with 0444 privileges. This small patch corrects that. Michael Index: bin/mkpackage =================================================================== --- bin/mkpackage (revision 2141) +++ bin/mkpackage (working copy) @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ my $pkgname = $config{pkgname}; my $existing_pkgspool = catfile $spooldir, $pkgname; - vexec( "rm -r $existing_pkgspool", "Failed to remove $existing_pkgspool" ) + vexec( "rm -rf $existing_pkgspool", "Failed to remove $existing_pkgspool" ) if -d $existing_pkgspool; } From udippel at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 15:39:08 2008 From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:39:08 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] gupdatedb in findutils fails Message-ID: <48469AFC.4000900@gmail.com> Okay, I got some 400.000 files when it started to fail, but now, with some 130.000, it still fails: # gupdatedb sort: insufficient memory; use -S option to increase allocation Broken Pipe # uname -a SunOS SolU 5.11 snv_81 i86pc i386 i86pc Does this have to do anything with these:? http://mlblog.osdir.com/os.solaris.solarisx86/2005-01/msg00051.html http://osdir.com/ml/solaris.solarisx86/2005-01/msg00024.html Uwe From udippel at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 15:43:23 2008 From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:43:23 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem Message-ID: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> # pkg-get -U # pkg-get -u > ... > gnomekeyring is up to date > Removing invalid local file glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > Trying > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > --21:29:19-- > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > => `glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz' > Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 > Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 2,775,949 (2.6M) [text/plain] > > 100%[====================================>] 2,775,949 60.27K/s > ETA 00:00 > > 21:30:25 (44.99 KB/s) - `glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz' saved > [2775949/2775949] > > ERROR: checksum glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does not match > remote checksum > (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) > glib is up to date > ... I did repeat the steps a few times ... Uwe From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Jun 4 17:05:14 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:05:14 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> References: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> Uwe Dippel wrote: >> ERROR: checksum glib2-2.16.3-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does not match >> remote checksum >> (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) >> glib is up to date >> ... > > I did repeat the steps a few times ... did you also try a different mirror site? From magrawal at coba.usf.edu Wed Jun 4 17:08:50 2008 From: magrawal at coba.usf.edu (Manish Agrawal) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:08:50 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] catalog out of date? In-Reply-To: <48458DCC.8050701@acm.org> References: <48444A30.4040700@srlonline.org> <48445114.3000300@srlonline.org> <48458DCC.8050701@acm.org> Message-ID: Thanks very much, would it be possible to make an announcement here when the catalog gets fixed. Thanks Manish On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:30:36 -0400, Alessio wrote: > Agrawal, Manish wrote: >> I am running into a problem with CSWgrcypt. I tried installing nessus and gnome, but could not install either because of the ERROR: no info for CSWgcrypt problem. I too have done pkg-get -U. > > the catalog will be fixed as soon as possible, try again tomorrow. > thanks > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From udippel at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 17:11:23 2008 From: udippel at gmail.com (Uwe Dippel) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:11:23 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> References: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> Message-ID: <4846B09B.9050403@gmail.com> Alessio wrote: > > did you also try a different mirror site? > Honestly: no. Uwe From a.cervellin at acm.org Wed Jun 4 19:18:12 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:18:12 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Small bug in bin/checkpkg (with test case and patch) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4846CE54.3000303@acm.org> Michael van der Westhuizen wrote: > Hi All, > > I've found a small bug in bin/checkpkg which prevents pm_digestmd2 > from passing checkpkg. > > The test case looks like this: > ---- snip ---- > #!/bin/ksh -p > > software=pm_digestmd2 > > case $software in > *[A-Z]*) > echo "Existing method: FAIL" > ;; > *) > echo "Existing method: PASS" > ;; > esac this reports PASS in my environment, why should it FAIL? From r1mikey at gmail.com Wed Jun 4 19:51:30 2008 From: r1mikey at gmail.com (Michael van der Westhuizen) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:51:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Small bug in bin/checkpkg (with test case and patch) In-Reply-To: <4846CE54.3000303@acm.org> References: <4846CE54.3000303@acm.org> Message-ID: Hi Alessio, On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Alessio wrote: > Michael van der Westhuizen wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've found a small bug in bin/checkpkg which prevents pm_digestmd2 >> from passing checkpkg. [snip] > > this reports PASS in my environment, why should it FAIL? I don't know why it's failing :-/ It fails on a freshly installed Solaris 10 u5 zone. Michael From karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com Thu Jun 5 15:14:17 2008 From: karl.d.thiele at verizonbusiness.com (Thiele, Karl D (Karl)) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:14:17 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Little help moving from Solaris 8 to 10 Message-ID: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB6260B4ADC25@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Been using Blastwave for ~ 2 years on Solaris 8 , but now moving to Solaris 10. I no longer have root, because our destops are going to be little more than an xterminal.... Someone else has to do Blastwave pkg-get and Blastwave software. In no way shape or form do I believe it is installed correctly. There is nothing in /opt/csw: kthiele at sbhomzzda12>ls ls> -la /opt/csw total 2 drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 512 May 23 17:58 ./ drwxr-xr-x 15 root sys 512 May 27 05:40 ../ Here is where y'all can help, since my associates do not blieve it is installed wrong. When pkg-get is installed this still occurs, according to Blastwave's "Howto get started" All the /opt/csw directories such as bin, etc, share, lib .... are created and pkg-get resides in bin.... I need someone from the mailing list to state that this is how Blastwave is installed on Solaris 10. Could they be installed else where? I do not think so, but correct me if I am wrong. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From blastwave at gmail.com Thu Jun 5 15:20:11 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:20:11 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Little help moving from Solaris 8 to 10 In-Reply-To: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB6260B4ADC25@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> References: <130A5B07E3D1094BA5A44E9F960CB6260B4ADC25@ASHEVS009.mcilink.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Thiele, Karl D (Karl) wrote: > Been using Blastwave for ~ 2 years on Solaris 8 , but now moving to Solaris > 10. > > I no longer have root, because our destops are going to be little more than > an xterminal.... > > Someone else has to do Blastwave pkg-get and Blastwave software. In no way > shape or form do I believe it is installed correctly. > > There is nothing in /opt/csw: Well that is *completely* WRONG. Is that clear ? When the software packages are installed they go into /opt/csw and that is exactly what you will see in the HOWTO page also. Even more important is that you set your PATH in your .profile ( or .bashrc etc etc ) such that /opt/csw/bin and then /opt/csw/sbin are first in your PATH. In that way you get the up to date cdrtools and openssh and openssl and 1800+ other software titles. Does this help ? Next thing on my mind .. is how in God's green earth did anyone install the software into some other place other than /opt/csw and what the heck were they thinking ? Dennis From KPaskett at srlonline.org Thu Jun 5 21:36:50 2008 From: KPaskett at srlonline.org (Keith Paskett) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:36:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Catalog Still BROKEN (in a new way) Message-ID: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> The catalog has a new problem--Two entries for libqp. libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 CSWcommon|CSWosslrt|CSWisaexec|CSWzlib|CSWreadline none libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 CSWreadline|CSWosslrt|CSWzlib|CSWisaexec none pkg-get -i libpq fails with: Sorry, there are multiple versions possible Please specify one, in the following syntax pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 Then "pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02" fails with: ERROR: checksum libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does not match remote checksum (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) The often used suggestion to do a "pkg-get -U" does not help. - Keith From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 6 08:15:59 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:15:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Catalog Still BROKEN (in a new way) In-Reply-To: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> References: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> Message-ID: <4848D61F.5010505@acm.org> The catalog should be finally fully fixed today... try again and let us know, thanks Keith Paskett wrote: > The catalog has a new problem--Two entries for libqp. > > libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq > libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 > CSWcommon|CSWosslrt|CSWisaexec|CSWzlib|CSWreadline none > libpq 8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 CSWlibpq > libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > 5b9fd23a707b6173f601b8ca6937fac7 734117 > CSWreadline|CSWosslrt|CSWzlib|CSWisaexec none > > pkg-get -i libpq fails with: > Sorry, there are multiple versions possible > Please specify one, in the following syntax > pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 > pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02 > > Then "pkg-get install libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02" fails with: > ERROR: checksum libpq-8.3.1,REV=2008.05.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz does > not match remote checksum > (perhaps you need to pkg-get -U ?) > > The often used suggestion to do a "pkg-get -U" does not help. > > - Keith > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 6 15:39:06 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:39:06 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Catalog Still BROKEN (in a new way) In-Reply-To: <4848D61F.5010505@acm.org> References: <48484052.2050602@srlonline.org> <4848D61F.5010505@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Alessio wrote: > The catalog should be finally fully fixed today... > > try again and let us know, thanks > This is something that I do independantly I have scripts that checks the catalog. What it does is this : 1 ) first it generates an output file with the md5 hash of every file in a given directory The output file has a valid "package triplet" which is the filename and then the md5 hash and then the file size in bytes. 2 ) then it checks to see if there is 1 entry and only 1 entry in the catalog for each package triplet hash and filename and file size data entry 3 ) the output from (2) is expected to produce output where there are zero entries in the catalog for a given md5hash because files are often pre-released before the new catalog is pushed out. That is fine. However there should be no output where there are more than 1 entries in the catalog for a given md5 hash or triplet. 4 ) then I check in reverse to see if every entry in the catalog with a md5 hash also exists as a file ( or link ) in that directory. If there is anything missing there is a problem. Let me show you by example. Suppose we have the sparc architecture catalog for Solaris 8 and we cd to the correct directory where those packages and catalog and descriptions files reside. first I look where I am for files there are NOT packages. # pwd /CSW/unstable/sparc/5.8 # find . -type f | grep -v "CSW\.pkg" ./catalog.old ./descriptions.old ./descriptions ./catalog # I do a common sense check to see what number of signatures I should have from step (1) # find . -type f | grep -c "CSW\.pkg" 1805 I then generate the md5 hashs : # /root/bin/step1_gen_sig.sh Which results in : # wc -l /tmp/package_sigs.txt 1805 /tmp/package_sigs.txt Which has contents in three fields; filename, md5hash and filesize in bytes. That data, in simple ASCII fields separated by spaces is what I call a "package triplet". # grep gzip /tmp/package_sigs.txt gzip-1.3.12,REV=2008.01.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg 87e1279512a6f9def6be660b9325522e 355840 mod_gzip-1.3.26.1,REV=2003.07.07.a-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 63007d4df538ae8c68fe5050107703de 108088 pkgzip-1.2-all-CSW.pkg.gz 1a8ac5b5bf63c4d8d06c2b2b17df75cb 6284 Logic dictates that there should be an entry in the catalog with the exact same data, character for character and not just for the md5 hashs : # grep -c 1a8ac5b5bf63c4d8d06c2b2b17df75cb catalog 1 # grep -c "pkgzip-1.2-all-CSW.pkg.gz 1a8ac5b5bf63c4d8d06c2b2b17df75cb 6284" catalog 1 So there you see that the catalog has valid data ( at least for those three fields ) for the package pkgzip-1.2. So in step (2) we need to check for each and every package signature triplet. # /root/bin/step2_verify_sigs_in_catalog.sh # No output is perfect. That script ( step 2 ) has an intermediate step in which an output file is created. The output looks like so : # /tmp/sig_count.sh | head -600 | tail -4 1 68bb1fdb7723c0865530acd3bdd04e5c javasvn-1.4.5,REV=2007.11.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 516c3bc67165a33053604f4bcb5c0116 jbig2dec-0.9,REV=2007.05.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 903c3b5d4aac4e61da40e3cbd9ac409e jbigkit-1.6,REV=2007.05.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 b8e39bf5c8c679728eae3f35bf64ebcc jboss3-3.2.6,REV=2005.02.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz See that leading digit "1" there ? That means that the package triplet exists once and only once in the catalog and that is a good thing. Guess what, a zero is okay too. That just means that some package has been pushed out but it is not in the catalog yet. Next comes the reverse check in which each md5hash in the catalog, in fact, the package triplet data is checked to exist in the output from step (1). That ensures that every single entry in the catalog actually exists as a file. This also creates an intermediate output file that looks like so : # /tmp/sigger.sh | head -600 | tail -4 1 68bb1fdb7723c0865530acd3bdd04e5c javasvn-1.4.5,REV=2007.11.18-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 516c3bc67165a33053604f4bcb5c0116 jbig2dec-0.9,REV=2007.05.26-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 903c3b5d4aac4e61da40e3cbd9ac409e jbigkit-1.6,REV=2007.05.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 1 b8e39bf5c8c679728eae3f35bf64ebcc jboss3-3.2.6,REV=2005.02.03-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz That should look similar, exactly, to the above data. Again the leading digit "1" shows me that the entries in the catalog actually exist as rela package files. Once and once only. Any other result would be flagged. # /root/bin/step3_verify_sigs_in_catalog_exist_as_files.sh # No output .. that is a perfect catalog. I think that is a pretty stringent test of the catalog and do you think I missed anything? Dennis From robert at gslt.hum.gu.se Tue Jun 10 09:49:58 2008 From: robert at gslt.hum.gu.se (Robert Andersson) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:49:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <4846B09B.9050403@gmail.com> References: <48469BFB.4070903@gmail.com> <4846AF2A.504@acm.org> <4846B09B.9050403@gmail.com> Message-ID: <18510.12838.672960.450265@mozart.gslt.hum.gu.se> Hello! >>>>> "UD" == Uwe Dippel writes: UD> Alessio wrote: >> >> did you also try a different mirror site? >> UD> Honestly: no. I can second this checksum problem with the glib2 packag, and I have tried both the primary site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable and the danish site http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/csw/unstable In addition, when running pkg-get [available|compare] I get glib2 listed twice, as well as the libpq package... yours, /robert -- Systems Administrator & IT-Coordinator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology Nordic Graduate School of Language Technology From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Tue Jun 10 20:14:40 2008 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:14:40 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem Message-ID: <11a73afd29f.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Da: robert at gslt.hum.gu.se Data: 10-giu-2008 9.49 A: "questions and discussions" Ogg: Re: [csw-users] glib2- problem Hello! > In addition, when running pkg-get [available|compare] I get glib2 > listed twice, as well as the libpq package... i don't see these problems: bash-3.00# pkg-get -U Getting catalog... --2008-06-10 20:09:28-- http://ibiblio. org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 357395 (349K) [text/plain] Saving to: `catalog' 100% [=======================================>] 357,395 98.3K/s in 4.2 s 2008-06-10 20:09:33 (82.4 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [357395/357395] Stripping off catalog signature without verifying Updating catalog file /var/pkg-get/catalog-ibiblio.org updated --2008-06-10 20:09:33-- http: //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/descriptions Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152. 46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 96643 (94K) [text/plain] Saving to: `descriptions' 100% [=======================================>] 96,643 52.2K/s in 1.8 s 2008-06-10 20:09:35 (52.2 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [96643/96643] Updated description file bash-3.00# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U bash-3.00# pkg-get compare |grep glib2 glib2 2.16.3 SAME bash-3.00# can you send the output of you commands? From robert at gslt.hum.gu.se Wed Jun 11 15:20:23 2008 From: robert at gslt.hum.gu.se (Robert Andersson) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:20:23 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] glib2-problem In-Reply-To: <11a73afd29f.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <11a73afd29f.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <18511.53527.715842.148708@mozart.gslt.hum.gu.se> After yet another "pkg-get -U" this afternoon our problems seem to have vanished. Maybe they were related to the problems described in a previous thread about the catalog being broken...? Anyway, thank you for listening, /robert >>>>> "AC" == Alessio Cervellin writes: AC> i don't see these problems: AC> bash-3.00# pkg-get -U AC> Getting AC> catalog... AC> --2008-06-10 20:09:28-- http://ibiblio. AC> org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog AC> Resolving AC> ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 AC> Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... AC> connected. AC> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK AC> Length: AC> 357395 (349K) [text/plain] AC> Saving to: `catalog' AC> 100% AC> [=======================================>] 357,395 98.3K/s in 4.2 AC> s AC> 2008-06-10 20:09:33 (82.4 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [357395/357395] AC> Stripping off catalog signature without verifying AC> Updating catalog file AC> /var/pkg-get/catalog-ibiblio.org updated AC> --2008-06-10 20:09:33-- http: AC> //ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/descriptions AC> Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 AC> Connecting to ibiblio.org|152. AC> 46.7.80|:80... connected. AC> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 AC> OK AC> Length: 96643 (94K) [text/plain] AC> Saving to: `descriptions' AC> 100% AC> [=======================================>] 96,643 52.2K/s in 1.8 AC> s AC> 2008-06-10 20:09:35 (52.2 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [96643/96643] AC> Updated description file AC> bash-3.00# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U AC> bash-3.00# AC> pkg-get compare |grep glib2 AC> glib2 AC> 2.16.3 SAME AC> bash-3.00# -- Systems Administrator & IT-Coordinator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology Nordic Graduate School of Language Technology From blastwave at gmail.com Thu Jun 12 16:46:27 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:46:27 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] RFE for pkg-get Message-ID: While on the phone with someone they were confused by these lines in the pkg-get.conf file : # Solaris 10: If you wish to limit pkg-get to installing packages # ONLY to the global zone, then uncomment this line PKGADDFLAGS=-G The line that says "uncomment this line" should read # ONLY to the global zone, then uncomment this next line believe it or not .. I can't make this stuff up. Dennis From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Thu Jun 12 18:25:36 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:25:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? Message-ID: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i have to migrate nis to ldap, and forced to do it with openldap. I installed CSWoldap, but trying to follow the README, i'm unable to understand what files are really missing or not? Is this package ready for solaris? On the net, i found few documents about solaris 8 or 9, but are they applicable to 10? is it normal that slapd.conf contains just: include /opt/csw/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema ? what about DUAConfgProfile.schema and solaris.schema? (*) thanks in advance for help or pointers, gerard (*) http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Installing%20and%20configuring%20OpenLDAP%20for%20Solaris9.htm From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Jun 12 20:26:02 2008 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:26:02 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? In-Reply-To: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> G?rard Henry wrote: > hello all, > i have to migrate nis to ldap, and forced to do it with openldap. Things could be worse, you might be forced to use eDirectory or AD! > I installed CSWoldap, but trying to follow the README, i'm unable to > understand what files are really missing or not? > Is this package ready for solaris? It wouldn't be in the repository if it wasn't ready ;-). > On the net, i found few documents about solaris 8 or 9, but are they > applicable to 10? > is it normal that slapd.conf contains just: > include /opt/csw/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema > ? Only including the core.schema is pretty normal for the default installation as it's required. It won't give you all the need for functional posix accounts, you'll need rfc2307bis.schema for that plus any schema's which it requires. > what about DUAConfgProfile.schema and solaris.schema? (*) DUAConfigProfile.schema is really only need if you plan on configuring your Solaris clients with ldapclient and a profile stored in the directory. This isn't required though it does simplify things. solaris.schema may or may not be used but it won't hurt to load it. > > (*) > http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Installing%20and%20configuring%20OpenLDAP%20for%20Solaris9.htm Gary's ldap pages are a great resource, be sure to read them all. Also check out PADL's Migration Tools as they will greatly simplify life, http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html. As I recall I needed to modify them a bit in order to properly create the ldif's for import but it was trivial. I did use some nis command to dump the tables to flat files but it was 2 years ago and I don't recall which one. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darinper at cognigencorp.com From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Jun 13 07:05:56 2008 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:05:56 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? In-Reply-To: <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> References: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <48520034.6090301@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Darin Perusich wrote: > >> (*) >> http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Installing%20and%20configuring%20OpenLDAP%20for%20Solaris9.htm > > Gary's ldap pages are a great resource, be sure to read them all. > thanks for all reply. I've started reading gary's document, it's very helpful. A new question, i got this message: Jun 12 18:04:14 annu1 slapd[22939]: [ID 816447 local4.error] warning: cannot open /opt/csw/etc/hosts.deny: No such file or directory why does slapd need the use of tcpwrappers? aren't access control in slapd.conf sufficient? gerard From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 13 13:35:55 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:35:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed Message-ID: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> finally evince has been fixed. latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 13 14:37:24 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:37:24 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: > finally evince has been fixed. > latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. thanks be to God and you ... Dennis From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 13 14:41:29 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:41:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: <48526AF9.2010003@acm.org> Dennis Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: >> finally evince has been fixed. >> latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing >> >> please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. > > thanks be to God cool, i didn't know he was involved in the gtk2 issues! From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Fri Jun 13 14:46:00 2008 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:46:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] openldap : package ready for solaris 10? In-Reply-To: <48520034.6090301@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <48514E00.3010105@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <48516A3A.3030803@cognigencorp.com> <48520034.6090301@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <48526C08.6080001@cognigencorp.com> G?rard Henry wrote: > A new question, i got this message: > Jun 12 18:04:14 annu1 slapd[22939]: [ID 816447 local4.error] warning: > cannot open /opt/csw/etc/hosts.deny: No such file or directory > > why does slapd need the use of tcpwrappers? aren't access control in > slapd.conf sufficient? > TCPwrappers are the preferred method for denying/allowing access to services, by using them you can control access before accessing said service. LDAP access controls are for the ldap access itself, not the service. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darinper at cognigencorp.com From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 13 15:59:24 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:59:24 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48526AF9.2010003@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> <48526AF9.2010003@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Alessio wrote: > Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: >>> finally evince has been fixed. >>> latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing >>> >>> please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. >> >> thanks be to God > > cool, i didn't know he was involved in the gtk2 issues! only if people ask .. .nicely dc From blastwave at gmail.com Fri Jun 13 17:57:54 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:57:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: > finally evince has been fixed. > latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. where is this puppy ? WARNING: The package "" is a prerequisite package and should be installed. Dennis From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Jun 13 18:01:35 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:01:35 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: <485299DF.7050406@acm.org> Dennis Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: >> finally evince has been fixed. >> latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing >> >> please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. > > where is this puppy ? > > WARNING: > The package "" is a prerequisite > package and should be installed. pkg-get -i shared_mime_info (it has been always there, nothing new) From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Jun 14 03:54:26 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:54:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> References: <48525B9B.7080800@acm.org> Message-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Alessio wrote: > finally evince has been fixed. > latest version can be found on http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > please upgrade your csw software (pkg-get -uU) before testing it. working perfectly on x86 thus far dc From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:20:12 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:50:12 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080615175012.00005131@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Excellent work! Good to have evince back. Only thing that crops up when running is this: [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ evince (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 2884: assertion `GTK_IS_WI DGET (widget)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1742: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 2884: assertion `GTK_IS_WI DGET (widget)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1742: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (evince:676): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkwidget.c: line 2884: assertion `GTK_IS_WI DGET (widget)' failed (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1742: assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed But it doesn't core anymore. Are these just warnings or should I take them seriously? Best wishes, h -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:24:36 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:54:36 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] Latest gcalctool problems... Message-ID: <20080615175436.0000262c@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Hi! Running the latest gcalctool here: [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep gcalctool gcalctool 5.21.91 SAME Works just fine, but when I do a subtraction, any, then, if the result is a floating point number, it displays a tab instead of a decimal point. I.e. the result is displayed something like this: 28 3 instead of 28.3 . Can anyone advise as to what may be causing this? Thanks, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:25:50 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:55:50 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] python modules out of sync... again... Message-ID: <20080615175550.00003f90@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ meld Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/meld", line 93, in import meldapp File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/meldapp.py", line 28, in import prefs File "/opt/csw/lib/meld/prefs.py", line 52, in import gconf ImportError: No module named gconf This happened before, when python was upgraded and the corresponding modules weren't refreshed. Just thought I'd bring that to everyone's attention. (Am I the only one using meld? ;-) ) Best wishes, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From ml at eroteme.org Sun Jun 15 15:32:27 2008 From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML]) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:02:27 +0430 Subject: [csw-users] Issues with xterm since last refresh... (Various) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080615180227.00003ba6@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> > I threw a massive pile of options at it thus : > > $ /opt/csw/bin/xterm +ah -b 4 -cr white -j -ls -ms white +mb -rw -aw > -s -sb +si -sk -sl 8192 +t -tn vt100 -vb -wf -T Solaris\ 8\ \:\ New\ > XTerm -bw 4 -bg black -bd red -fg green -fn > -adobe-courier-medium-r-normal--25-180-100-100-m-150-iso8859-1 > > ... and then scrolled up and down like mad and the Page_Up and Page_Dn > keys works perfectly for me. i tried it with your options and whilst the whole thing looks pretty swell, PgUp / PgDn don't work for me still. > What are you running? Solaris 8 ? 9 ? 10 ? on CDE ? GNOME ? XFCE ? SXCE build 86. WindowMaker. Worked flawlessly before 228. > Your original email mentioned an error in xterm trying to obtain an > input method. Do you have any locales or LC_* or LANG environment > variables specified that's triggering an attempt to hook up an X > Input Method you might not have available on your system? If > nothing's changed on your system other than xterm, it could be that > your older xterm ignored these things and the newer one pays > attention. :-) [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ env | grep LC [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ env | grep LANG LANG=C [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ env | grep XT XTERM_SHELL=/opt/csw/bin/bash XTERM_LOCALE=C XTERM_VERSION=XTerm(235) > I suggest clearing your environment of everything that looks like a > locale and see if the error persists. > i think it's a locale problem too. > i suggest to unset any locale environment variable and/or use the > specific variable $XTERM_LOCALE I unset LANG, started an xterm, checked the env, there's no locale set whatsoever except for the three XTERM variables above. Still no PgUp / PgDn. Thanks for any further suggestions you may have. Best wishes, Hakim -- S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Jun 15 15:36:36 2008 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:36:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince fixed In-Reply-To: <20080615175012.00005131@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> References: <20080615175012.00005131@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org> Message-ID: <48551AE4.9060703@acm.org> S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote: > Excellent work! Good to have evince back. > > Only thing that crops up when running is this: > > [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ evince > > (evince:676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 1718: > assertion `G_ IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > > But it doesn't core anymore. > > Are these just warnings or should I take them seriously? as far as i know they are harmless and they are common to other programs depending on gtk2 and glib2 From zhihengz at gmail.com Wed Jun 18 20:20:46 2008 From: zhihengz at gmail.com (Jason Zhang) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:20:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] vncserver + CSWGnome Message-ID: <1213813246.16595.16.camel@mars.intervoice.int> Hi, Anybody has experience on using CSWGnome with vncserver in solaris 10 sparc ? I installed the lateste solaris 10 on Sun-Fire-V210: ------------------------------ bash-3.00$ uname -a SunOS firebird 5.10 Generic_127127-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210 ------------------------------- Followed instruction on http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html to install CSWgnome The vncserver comes with Solaris default installation and it is RealVNC 4.0 ------------------------------ -bash-3.00$ which vncserver /usr/bin/vncserver ------------------------------ If I am using this xstartup: ------------------------------ -bash-3.00$ more xstartup.jds #!/bin/sh exec /usr/bin/gnome-session ------------------------------ I can connect to the box and get nice JDS gnome desktop. but if I copy /etc/dt/config/Xinitrc.CSWgnome as my xstartup, I will get message in log file when starting vncserver: ------------------------------ -bash-3.00$ tail firebird\:1.log Wed Jun 18 13:16:57 2008 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 Starting CSW GNOME 2.14 X_mkdir: Not owner X_mkdir: Not owner SESSION_MANAGER=local/firebird:/tmp/.ICE-unix/814,inet6/firebird:32795,inet/firebird:32796 Window manager warning: 0 stored in GConf key /apps/metacity/general/num_workspaces is not a reasonable number of workspaces, current maximum is 36 Window manager warning: Log level 32: could not find XKB extension. ------------------------------ and when I login using vncviewer, there is no gnome panel at all, only a desktop with Computer, Trash, Desktop Overview and StarOffice 8. Anything went wrong ? Or CSWGnome does not work with vnc ? Thanks for your advice! --Jason From chris at goodshow.net Sun Jun 22 17:14:04 2008 From: chris at goodshow.net (Chris Bellomy) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:14:04 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? Message-ID: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! Are archives of previous versions of CSW packages kept anywhere? If so, where? If not, might anyone have an older version of the cyrus-imap package lying around? Thanks, Chris Bellomy chris at goodshow.net From dam at blastwave.org Sun Jun 22 17:53:07 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:53:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? In-Reply-To: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> References: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> Message-ID: <7E976A00-BA48-433F-B5E8-B222738FDF9C@blastwave.org> Hi Chris, Am 22.06.2008 um 17:14 schrieb Chris Bellomy: > I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been > unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, > it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server > to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! > > Are archives of previous versions of CSW packages kept anywhere? Old versions are available from > If so, where? If not, might anyone have an older version of the > cyrus-imap package lying around? My personal archive at doesn't go back as far, but also has stable/ archived. Best regards -- Dagobert Michelsen From william at wbonnet.net Sun Jun 22 18:30:29 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:30:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] /testing JBoss 4.2.2-GA is available Message-ID: <485E7E25.6040907@wbonnet.net> Hi all JBoss Application server is now available from testing. I have update the previously unmaintained package. SMF support is included. Please send me your feedbacks :) cheers, W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Sun Jun 22 19:38:30 2008 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:38:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? In-Reply-To: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> References: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> Message-ID: <485E8E16.1050607@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Chris Bellomy a ?crit : > I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been > unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, > it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server > to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! A userspace application, not kernel related at all, which causes a kernel panic ? It's a bit surprising. Have you more information about this problem to help understand how cyrus could be responsible for it ? Yann From chris at goodshow.net Sun Jun 22 21:25:55 2008 From: chris at goodshow.net (Chris Bellomy) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:25:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Is it possible to downrev? In-Reply-To: <485E8E16.1050607@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <149FF4DD-D80F-413B-8A53-B74CCC140316@goodshow.net> <485E8E16.1050607@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <9CFBE1D4-BB53-4676-B748-42E94F78D0E7@goodshow.net> On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Yann Rouillard wrote: > Chris Bellomy a ?crit : >> I run a mail server with exim and cyrus-imap that has been >> unstable since I upgraded all my apps last month. Specifically, >> it seems that lmtp delivery in cyrus-imap is causing the server >> to kernel panic -- not exactly what I'm used to from Solaris! > > A userspace application, not kernel related at all, which causes a > kernel panic ? > It's a bit surprising. Have you more information about this problem to > help understand how cyrus could be responsible for it ? It's been an ordeal to track down, but I got on console yesterday and first disabled exim at boot time. The server would come up stable. Then I would start exim, and a few seconds later I'd watch the kernel panic scroll across the screen. Unfortunately it scrolls across so fast that I couldn't begin to write any of the info down. After it came back up again, I ran exim -q -v to watch the queue runner process the queue. I saw it process the full LMTP handshake up to DATA, at which point the server rebooted again. Now this is only one data point, which is flimsy of course, but this machine has rebooted several times over the last few weeks, but never when I had message delivery disabled. If this weren't the case, I'd be chasing physical layer issues, as I'm as mystified by how a user application could do this as you seem to be. FWIW, this is OpenSolaris x86, SNV 67, with ZFS everywhere. My best guess how cyrus could be causing this would be that it may be tickling a ZFS bug in our relatively old version of Solaris. To that end, I'm building out a new box tomorrow with the latest Solaris rev and moving mail to it ASAP. Thoughts/feedback are very welcome. cb From laurent at opensolaris.org Mon Jun 23 17:07:18 2008 From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:07:18 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch Message-ID: <485FBC26.1020406@opensolaris.org> Hi all, I'm having some issues with emacs, from the stable branch. When trying to save, it crashes with the following d-bus error: emacs process 15522: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": No such file or directory See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace Fatal error (6)Abort There is not even a /opt/csw/var/lib directory, so I don't understand. Does it have anything to do with the many unstable GNOME packages that crept in the stable branch? I thought that stable meant just that, avoiding the issues of the bleeding edge development packages? TIA, Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Mon Jun 23 17:12:34 2008 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:12:34 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch Message-ID: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> > read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": No it was a known bug of the pkg (alreday fixed in unstable i guess). you can fix it this way: - if a file named /var/lib/dbus/machine-id exists in you machine, symlink it to /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id - if it does not exist, create it using /opt/csw/bin/dbus-uuidgen From laurent at opensolaris.org Mon Jun 23 17:42:31 2008 From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:42:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch In-Reply-To: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> References: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Message-ID: <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> Alessio Cervellin a ?crit : >> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": > No > > it was a known bug of the pkg (alreday fixed in unstable i guess). > you can fix it this way: > - if a file named /var/lib/dbus/machine-id > exists in you machine, symlink it to /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id > - > if it does not exist, create it using /opt/csw/bin/dbus-uuidgen Thanks a lot, this helps me find that CSWdbus was actually missing. I had just moved from unstable to stable, because there were some very annoying issues with glib 2.16, and it seems that in the process of reverting some packages to older versions, I lost dbus. Unstable is really a mess those days, I got issues with that branch far too often. After opening bugs, I was told to just use stable to fix them. Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | From william at wbonnet.net Mon Jun 23 23:03:07 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:03:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch In-Reply-To: <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> References: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> Message-ID: <48600F8B.7000406@wbonnet.net> Salut Laurent > Alessio Cervellin a ?crit : > >>> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": >>> >> No >> >> it was a known bug of the pkg (alreday fixed in unstable i guess). >> you can fix it this way: >> - if a file named /var/lib/dbus/machine-id >> exists in you machine, symlink it to /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id >> - >> if it does not exist, create it using /opt/csw/bin/dbus-uuidgen >> > > Thanks a lot, this helps me find that CSWdbus was actually missing. I > had just moved from unstable to stable, because there were some very > annoying issues with glib 2.16, and it seems that in the process of > reverting some packages to older versions, I lost dbus. > > Unstable is really a mess those days, I got issues with that branch far > too often. After opening bugs, I was told to just use stable to fix them. > > Bon visiblement Alessio t'as aid?. Il semble que tu ai eu un petit probl?me avec DBus ... on se demande ce que fous le maintainer franchement ! C'est limite pas test? ce truc :( Humm... ah tien c'est bete c'est moi le maintainer :) Si tu as d'autres ennuis, h?sites pas ? me faire signe. Les r?sultats seront ?videment diffus?s sur la liste d?s que ce sera tomb? en marche. En tout cas je confirme ce que dit Alessio, c'etait d?j? rapport? et corrig?. Mais il doit en rester d'autres :( amicalement W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Mon Jun 23 23:10:39 2008 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:10:39 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] D-Bus issues in the stable branch In-Reply-To: <48600F8B.7000406@wbonnet.net> References: <11ab5fbc740.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> <485FC467.4050501@opensolaris.org> <48600F8B.7000406@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <4860114F.5020206@wbonnet.net> Hi all > Bon visiblement Alessio t'as aid?. Il semble que tu ai eu un petit > probl?me avec DBus ... on se demande ce que fous le maintainer > franchement ! C'est limite pas test? ce truc :( > > Humm... ah tien c'est bete c'est moi le maintainer :) > > Si tu as d'autres ennuis, h?sites pas ? me faire signe. Les r?sultats > seront ?videment diffus?s sur la liste d?s que ce sera tomb? en > marche. En tout cas je confirme ce que dit Alessio, c'etait d?j? > rapport? et corrig?. Mais il doit en rester d'autres :( > > amicalement > W. > ok now that is official i do HATE Thunderbird ! :D By the way i do apologize to you all for sending this "French written email" to you all when i was thinking to send it only to Laurent ... cheers, W. PS: This email also says in French, that DBus package may hide some other hidden bugs, as any other package standing in testing. So don't hesitate to contact the list, to the maintainer or to the bugtracker if you undercover any issues. I'll try to fix them as soom as possible. PS2: once again... i do apologize ! -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From pgress at optonline.net Tue Jun 24 02:55:20 2008 From: pgress at optonline.net (Paul Gress) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:55:20 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with pkgadd Message-ID: <486045F8.5020709@optonline.net> Hi all, I have sxce b91 install on my laptop. I am having trouble getting pkg-get to install any software. It seems to be related to pkgadd. This is what I get from the command line: # /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i common WARNING: gpg not found No existing install of CSWcommon found. Installing... Pre-existing local file common-1.4.6,REV=2008.04.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Hmmm. Retrying with different archive offset...28 blocks Processing package instance from common - common files and dirs for CSW packages(i386) 1.4.6,REV=2008.04.28 http://www.blastwave.org/ packaged for CSW by Philip Brown ## Executing checkinstall script. /var/tmp//installv8aacc/checkinstallz8aacc: test: argument expected pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully Installation of failed. No changes were made to the system. ERROR: could not add CSWcommon. # I have done the above command with truss, and attached the file. I gzipped it to reducer the size. The only relevant text I get from the truss output is: stat64("/var/pkg-get/downloads/CSWcommon", 0x0808EFC8) = 0 stat64("CSWcommon/install/depend", 0x0808EFC8) Err#2 ENOENT stat64("/var/pkg-get/pkgask/CSWcommon", 0x0808EFC8) Err#2 ENOENT Maybe somebody can see something better than me. Any help in solving this would be appreciated. Paul -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: truss_pkg-get_csw.txt.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 579 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pgress at optonline.net Tue Jun 24 03:27:43 2008 From: pgress at optonline.net (Paul Gress) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:27:43 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with pkgadd In-Reply-To: <486045F8.5020709@optonline.net> References: <486045F8.5020709@optonline.net> Message-ID: <48604D8F.9090707@optonline.net> OK, I'm replying to myself. I solved the problem. It wasn't related to pkgadd because I was able to install other programs from SFW with pkgadd. It was that I was testing changing my hostid, done in my /etc/rc2.d directory at S05 level (obviously not soon enough) was confusing pkg-get. When I removed the startup script and rebooted, I had no problem using pkg-get at all. Paul From laurent at opensolaris.org Tue Jun 24 10:13:16 2008 From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:13:16 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] emacs_gtk crashes when opening Save As dialog Message-ID: <4860AC9C.5070200@opensolaris.org> Hello all, I'm having a lot of trouble with emacs_gtk. It starts fine, but it crashes one time out of 3 when opening the Save As dialog. Sometimes the dialog appears, I can cancel, and on the next tries it crashes as soon as I select Save As. Or it crashed right after displaying the pop up. The errors are not always the same: $ emacs Fatal error (10)Bus Error $ /opt/csw/bin/emacs Fatal error (11)Segmentation Fault (core dumped) This happens both on Solaris 9 SPARC not recently patched, and on Solaris 10 x86 patched 2 weeks ago. Since I went from unstable to stable, some packages ar slightly more recent, but I doubt they're the cause of the problem: /opt/csw/share/emacs]# pkg-get -c | grep -v 'Not installed' | grep -v SAME WARNING: gpg not found # (From site http://blastwave.solaris-fr.org/stable ) software localrev remoterev aalib 1.4.0,REV=2008.04.13_rev=rc5 1.4.0,REV=2004.10.15_rev=rc5 ghostscript 8.62,REV=2008.04.15 8.61 libgcrypt 1.4.1,REV=2008.05.27 1.4.0 openssl 0.9.8g,REV=2008.04.30_rev=g 0.9.8g,REV=2008.03.22_rev=g perl 5.8.8,REV=2008.03.25 5.8.8,REV=2007.10.05 samba_lib 3.0.23,REV=2006.08.09b 3.0.22,REV=2006.06.21 screen 4.0.3,REV=2008.04.30 4.0.2,REV=2005.11.02 Thanks for any help. Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | From binod3 at gmail.com Wed Jun 25 20:30:28 2008 From: binod3 at gmail.com (Binod) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:30:28 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] About subversion 1.5 Message-ID: <111cdbc80806251130h5a9cd419g7207881bad24ba91@mail.gmail.com> Hi Guys, Is Blastwave planning to add subversion 1.5 version which just got out, anytime soon ? I am using 1.4.3 downloaded from csw and I will also prefer to get 1.5 version once it is available. I know its not even out there for download yet even on the collabnet, but will we be adding it once it is available? I would like to play with 1.5 version of subversion. Just wanted to see if it is something possible or not? Thanks, Binod -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bonivart at blastwave.org Wed Jun 25 20:40:41 2008 From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:40:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] About subversion 1.5 In-Reply-To: <111cdbc80806251130h5a9cd419g7207881bad24ba91@mail.gmail.com> References: <111cdbc80806251130h5a9cd419g7207881bad24ba91@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e30806251140l4da10b25ia1726598d1af3fef@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Binod wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Is Blastwave planning to add subversion 1.5 version which just got out, > anytime soon ? > > I am using 1.4.3 downloaded from csw and I will also prefer to get 1.5 > version once it is available. I know its not even out there for download yet > even on the collabnet, but will we be adding it once it is available? > > I would like to play with 1.5 version of subversion. > > Just wanted to see if it is something possible or not? Unfortunately subversion has no active maintainer at the moment. If you're up to it, feel free to sign up as a maintainer and build it. -- Arnold Schwarzenegger - "I have a love interest in every one of my films - a gun." From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Jun 28 19:20:39 2008 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:20:39 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] xterm on OpenSolaris dependency issue Message-ID: I know that the xterm package was never intended to run on OpenSolaris but here is the data just in case we can fix it up or recompile for OpenSolaris $ uname -a SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc $ cat /etc/release OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_86_rc3 X86 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 26 April 2008 $ ldd /opt/csw/bin/xterm libXft.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libXft.so.2 libfreetype.so.6 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libfreetype.so.6 libz.so => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libz.so libXrender.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libXrender.so.1 libX11.so.4 => /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4 libfontconfig.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libfontconfig.so.1 libXaw.so.5 => (file not found) libXmu.so.4 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXmu.so.4 libXext.so.0 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0 libXt.so.4 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4 libXt.so.4 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) libXt.so.4 (SUNWprivate) => (version not found) libSM.so.6 => /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6 libICE.so.6 => /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6 libcurses.so.1 => /lib/libcurses.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libz.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) libXau.so.6 => /usr/X11/lib/libXau.so.6 libiconv.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libiconv.so.2 libexpat.so.0 => /opt/csw/lib/i386/libexpat.so.0 libXmuu.so.1 => /usr/X11/lib/libXmuu.so.1 libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libmd.so.1 => /lib/libmd.so.1 libscf.so.1 => /lib/libscf.so.1 libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 libXevie.so.1 => /usr/X11/lib/libXevie.so.1 libXss.so.1 => /usr/X11/lib/libXss.so.1 Note the annoying libXt.so.4 lib there that is found in /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4 My attempt to run xterm and diplay remotely results in $ ld.so.1: xterm86: fatal: libXaw.so.5: open failed: No such file or directory [1] + Killed /opt/csw/bin/xterm +ah -b 4 -cr yellow -j -ls -ms white +mb -rw -aw -s -sb +si -sk -sl 2048 +t -tn vt100 -vb -wf -T aequitas -bw 4 -bg black -bd red -fg green -display mercury:0 & I'll hook up an OpenSolaris based build box .. shortly. I already have it in the rack but I can not netboot the os200805 release. Dennis From dam at blastwave.org Mon Jun 30 16:03:43 2008 From: dam at blastwave.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:03:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP and RootDSE-Patch for Solaris 8 Client Message-ID: Hi Alex, I have a problem with OpenLDAP 2.3.38 and using Solaris 8 7/03 as LDAP client: > bopack8# ldapclient -i -v \ > -a simple \ > -D cn=proxyagent,ou=profile,dc=baltic-online,dc=de -w xxxxxxx \ > -b dc=baltic-online,dc=de \ > -B 'auto_home:(ou=auto.home,dc=baltic-online,dc=de)' \ > -B 'auto_master:(automountMapName=auto.master,dc=baltic- > online,dc=de)' \ > ldap.baltic-online.de > parsing -a option > auth set to NS_LDAP_AUTH_SIMPLE needpwd 1 > parsing -D option > parsing -w option > parsing -b option > parsing -B option > parsing -B option > v1__findDN: begins > v1__findDN: calling __ns_ldap_default_config() > found 0 namingcontexts > Cannot find the rootDN This looks like a missing SOLARISROOTDSE, however, this has been removed as this should no longer be necessary. Any idea of what is going wrong here? Thanks! -- Dago