From laurent at opensolaris.org  Tue Nov  4 14:55:44 2008
From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:55:44 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Updated CUPS?
Message-ID: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>

Hi all,

Any idea if there's going to be an update of the CUPS package? I sent an
email to the maintainer through the web interface, but no answer.

Laurent
-- 
/ Leader de Projet & Communaut?    | I'm working, but not speaking for
\ G11N   http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com
/ FOSUG  http://guses.org          |

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 15:33:00 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:33:00 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Updated CUPS?
In-Reply-To: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
Message-ID: <8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>

Hi Laurent,

Am 04.11.2008 um 14:55 schrieb Laurent Blume:
> Any idea if there's going to be an update of the CUPS package? I  
> sent an
> email to the maintainer through the web interface, but no answer.

The maintainer (Markus Mayer) is already working on it:
   <http://gar.opencsw.org/trac/browser/csw/trunk/net/cups>


Best regards

   -- Dago

From laurent at opensolaris.org  Tue Nov  4 16:21:03 2008
From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:21:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Updated CUPS?
In-Reply-To: <8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>

Dagobert Michelsen a ?crit :
> The maintainer (Markus Mayer) is already working on it:
>    <http://gar.opencsw.org/trac/browser/csw/trunk/net/cups>

Oh, good!

Thanks for the info, Dago!

Laurent
-- 
/ Leader de Projet & Communaut?    | I'm working, but not speaking for
\ G11N   http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com
/ FOSUG  http://guses.org          |

From aaron at ernieball.com  Tue Nov  4 17:23:40 2008
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:23:40 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>
Message-ID: <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>

Just found out today I can use either of these mirrors:

http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current
or
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable


For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox 
2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.

Am I supposed to make a decision based on that nonsense drama I kind of 
remember reading about a few months ago?

From ggunselm at emporia.edu  Tue Nov  4 17:45:37 2008
From: ggunselm at emporia.edu (Glen Gunselman)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:45:37 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org> <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <491027D1.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu>

 
I think the general recommendation would be to choose one or the other for a given server.
(I think this is stated, or at least hinted at, on the opencsw web site.)
 
have a good day,
Glen
(I, too, would feel more comfortable with less drama and more fact.)
 

>>> Aaron Wilson <aaron at ernieball.com> 11/4/2008 10:23 AM >>>
Just found out today I can use either of these mirrors:

http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current 
or
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable 


For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox 
2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.

Am I supposed to make a decision based on that nonsense drama I kind of 
remember reading about a few months ago?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.opencsw.org 
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081104/256c13f6/attachment.htm 

From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov  4 17:47:09 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:47:09 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
Message-ID: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>

I just got around to refreshing my blastwave packages.  Unfortunately,
I when pulled down the latest gm4, it pulled in libsigsegv, and the
libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.

Is this a mistake, or has Blastwave moved on and MDed these older
Sparcs?

Thanks,
Rob

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 18:04:11 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:04:11 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
Message-ID: <7F07FBCB-92F9-42B0-95A8-C161843DBFDF@opencsw.org>

Hi Rob,

Am 04.11.2008 um 17:47 schrieb Rob Stampfli:
> I just got around to refreshing my blastwave packages.

Could you please state which mirror you used (where
your pkg-get.conf points to)?

> Unfortunately,
> I when pulled down the latest gm4, it pulled in libsigsegv, and the
> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.
>
> Is this a mistake, or has Blastwave moved on and MDed these older
> Sparcs?

I cannot speak for Blastwave. OpenCSW builds binaries
for Solaris 8 for SPARC, so every machine capable of
running Solaris 8 should be able to execute every package
available on OpenCSW for Solaris 8. If this is not the
case it is considered a bug.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From james at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 18:13:03 2008
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:13:03 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
Message-ID: <20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 04/11/08, 16:47:09, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs:

> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.

It's a bug:
http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=1700



James.

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 23:33:25 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:33:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
	<20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <DC4E2143-4F56-4531-99AE-62459C6BC2EB@opencsw.org>

Hi James,

Am 04.11.2008 um 17:13 schrieb James Lee:
> On 04/11/08, 16:47:09, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote  
> regarding
> [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs:
>
>> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
>> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.
>
> It's a bug:
> http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=1700

I moved that into GAR. Please try from
   <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing-bydate.html>

   <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz>
   <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz>

Please let me know if it works or not.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov  4 23:52:45 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:52:45 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <DC4E2143-4F56-4531-99AE-62459C6BC2EB@opencsw.org>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
	<20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<DC4E2143-4F56-4531-99AE-62459C6BC2EB@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20081104225245.GA12850@keevey>

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:33:25PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> Am 04.11.2008 um 17:13 schrieb James Lee:
> > On 04/11/08, 16:47:09, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote  
> > regarding
> > [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs:
> >
> >> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
> >> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.
> >
> > It's a bug:
> > http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=1700
> 
> I moved that into GAR. Please try from
>    <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing-bydate.html>
> 
>    <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
> libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz>
>    <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
> libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz>
> 
> Please let me know if it works or not.

Grabbed it from the first URL, and yes, it seems to have fixed the
problem.

Thanks Dago, exp for the fast response!

Rob

From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov  4 23:59:00 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:59:00 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] What's going on with the clamav package?
Message-ID: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>

As long as I'm on a roll here, can anyone shed some light as to
what's going on with the clamav package?  It has not been updated
since February, although there has been about a half-dozen updates
issued by the clamav folks in that timeframe.

Inquiring minds want to know... ;^)

Rob

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Nov  5 00:35:54 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 00:35:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] What's going on with the clamav package?
In-Reply-To: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>
References: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>
Message-ID: <625385e30811041535v21226ebt5771e268d47182a0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:
> As long as I'm on a roll here, can anyone shed some light as to
> what's going on with the clamav package?  It has not been updated
> since February, although there has been about a half-dozen updates
> issued by the clamav folks in that timeframe.
>
> Inquiring minds want to know... ;^)

ClamAV was one Alex Moore's packages and he's retired as a maintainer.
I have an interest in several of his packages and have done a test
build of ClamAV but shifted to release SpamAssassin instead (in
opencsw.org/testing now). I will take up ClamAV again now when they
have released 0.94.1 but I've been busy with pkgutil until now.

-- 
/peter

From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Wed Nov  5 00:50:18 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:50:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] What's going on with the clamav package?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30811041535v21226ebt5771e268d47182a0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>
	<625385e30811041535v21226ebt5771e268d47182a0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20081104235018.GA13128@keevey>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:35:54AM +0100, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:
> > As long as I'm on a roll here, can anyone shed some light as to
> > what's going on with the clamav package?  It has not been updated
> > since February, although there has been about a half-dozen updates
> > issued by the clamav folks in that timeframe.
> >
> > Inquiring minds want to know... ;^)
> 
> ClamAV was one Alex Moore's packages and he's retired as a maintainer.
> I have an interest in several of his packages and have done a test
> build of ClamAV but shifted to release SpamAssassin instead (in
> opencsw.org/testing now). I will take up ClamAV again now when they
> have released 0.94.1 but I've been busy with pkgutil until now.

Thanks, Peter.  I hadn't realized Alex had retired.  He surely did
quite a lot for Blastwave, and that will be a loss for the community.

Thanks for agreeing to pick up the slack.  If there is anything I can
do to assist you, please let me know.

Rob

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Nov  5 21:59:33 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:59:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <491027D1.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org> <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
	<491027D1.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu>
Message-ID: <F71425FD-282A-4A23-A0D2-A1B7994174CC@opencsw.org>

Hi Glen,

Am 04.11.2008 um 17:45 schrieb Glen Gunselman:
> (I, too, would feel more comfortable with less drama and more fact.)

The drama is over, facts now starting.

> For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox
> 2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.

OpenCSW now has firefox 2.0.17, too :-)

> Am I supposed to make a decision based on that nonsense drama I kind  
> of
> remember reading about a few months ago?

No. Make your decision which repository fits your needs best.
If you miss anything on OpenCSW please post to users or,
even better, get involved.


Best regards

   -- Dago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081105/5ac3f43f/attachment.htm 

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  5 22:13:41 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
Message-ID: <57997.10.0.66.17.1225919621.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>


> Hi Glen,
>
> No. Make your decision which repository fits your needs best.
> If you miss anything on OpenCSW please post to users or,
> even better, get involved.
>

Anything I see of value will get released from Blastwave anyways so it
makes little difference. thus :

+------+---------------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| id   | pkgname       | pathname                                 |
pkg_md5sum                       |
+------+---------------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| 4184 | CSWlibsigsegv | /opt/csw/include/sigsegv.h               |
b0fb035b8fc9728ff3ec905b8eecb4ea |
| 4185 | CSWlibsigsegv | /opt/csw/lib/libsigsegv.so.0.0.0         |
b0fb035b8fc9728ff3ec905b8eecb4ea |
| 4186 | CSWlibsigsegv | /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libsigsegv.so.0.0.0 |
b0fb035b8fc9728ff3ec905b8eecb4ea |
+------+---------------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+

Dennis Clarke


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Nov  6 09:08:54 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:08:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW Real Life Meeting
In-Reply-To: <73D64564-EE88-4B08-AA7A-E9C6349639CD@opencsw.org>
References: <73D64564-EE88-4B08-AA7A-E9C6349639CD@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <ECDBA947-EAC0-444D-B897-E843D7FDF136@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 22.10.2008 um 23:13 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> there will be a real-life meeting of OpenCSW maintainers
> and users to create a OpenCSW Foundation on 11/29/2008
> in Zurich, Switzerland. Please see
>   <http://blog.opencsw.org/>
> for details.

FYI: The meeting has been rescheduled to Saturday,
6. December.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Wed Nov 12 21:14:47 2008
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:14:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Apcupsd package
Message-ID: <491B3937.6060401@opencsw.org>

Hello,

I've packaged Apcupsd http://www.apcupsd.org/ and it's now on testing.

http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/apcupsd-3.14.4,REV=2008.11.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/apcupsd-3.14.4,REV=2008.11.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Nov 12 22:13:54 2008
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:13:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>
	<4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <491B4712.7090505@wbonnet.net>

Hi


> For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox 
> 2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.
>   
I confirm that Firefox version for both Blastwave and OpenCSW are the same.

Regards,

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris 
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group



From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Nov 13 11:10:33 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:10:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.2 released
Message-ID: <625385e30811130210v65f630d1v1712bea116e8d410@mail.gmail.com>

Yesterday I submitted pkgutil 1.2 for release into current/unstable.
It should now have reached all the mirrors.

There's quite a lot of new stuff, this is the change log from the readme file:

- Temp site (-t) does no longer replace the mirror defined in
pkgutil.conf. It instead is considered the primary location and the
mirror defined in pkgutil.conf is considered the secondary. That means
you can point -t to your own repository of packages that are built
with dependencies to CSW and it will fetch all packages necessary
regardless of their location
- Better MD5 support for Solaris 8 and 9
- Arguments to -a and -c are now treated like filters so "pkgutil -a
bind dhcp" equals "pkgutil -a | egrep -i 'bind|dhcp'"
- Changed version info to be -v instead of -V
- Added -V (--syscheck) to show info about binaries and more that
pkgutil needs to support all features
- Perldoc/man page updated with configuration file info
- Search for gzip in more places
- Fixed bug when reporting package missing in catalog (Dagobert Michelsen)
- Bundled wget binaries moved to /opt/csw/libexec/pkgutil
- bldcat (build catalog) supports CSW_CATEGORY
- bldcat now extracts data in a more dependable way
- chkcat (check catalog) checks for duplicates in catalog
- chkcat with option -v checks the catalog data against actual package
files if they are located in the same directory as the catalog parsed

The first one is the big one if you make your own packages. I combined
a few features to upgrade one server to pkgutil 1.2 before it had been
released by placing the package on a web server I control, using
bldcat to make a catalog for it and then using pkgutil -t to combine
my web servers catalog with the official one (specified in
pkgutil.conf). The result is that when I want to upgrade pkgutil it
finds pkgutil 1.2 on my web server and downloads it from there.

With just one package it would of course have been easier to just
pkgadd it manually :-) but you get the idea that you can make your own
catalogs that combined with the CSW catalog makes it easy to install
your own software even if it depends on CSW packages.

The wiki site is updated with more info and examples:
http://wiki.opencsw.org/pkgutil.

Happy upgrading! :-)

-- 
/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Nov 14 02:22:49 2008
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:22:49 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] pkg-get 4.0beta
Message-ID: <20081113172249.K72975@bolthole.com>

FYI: at long last, I've put up another pkg-get 4.0 beta package, at

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkg_get-4.0,REV=2008.11.12.beta-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg

comments are hereby invited.


I actually wrote most of this update in the beginning of this year, but got
sidelined releasing and developing it, having become Rather Busy needing
to rewrite almost from scratch, key pieces of CSW infrastructure that
I was denied access to :-(
But now that we are happily stable in that area,I can get back to
pkg-get development.

I have finally gotten the time to address almost all bugs and feature
requests filed against it. 


From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Nov 14 07:50:40 2008
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:50:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox 2.0.0.18 is available
Message-ID: <491D1FC0.2020107@wbonnet.net>

Hi,

The latest update of Firefox (version 2.0.0.18) is now available from 
testing. This release includes several security fixes ( 
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox20.html#firefox2.0.0.18 
). The release notes are availables from this place ( 
http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/2.0.0.18/releasenotes/ ).

This update should be pushed to unstable soon. Thanks for your feedbacks 
if you experience any problem with this testing version.

Best regards,

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris 
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group



From sebastian at skayser.de  Fri Nov 14 16:44:21 2008
From: sebastian at skayser.de (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:44:21 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW bugtracker notifications?
Message-ID: <491D9CD5.70609@skayser.de>

Hi *,

i filed some bugs using the OpenCSW bugtracker [1] and Phil has done
some work on them recently, which is great.

However, i noticed that i did not receive any email notifications,
although the email settings on my account preferences page [2] make me
believe that i should receive such notifications. I only found out about
the work being done on the bugs by checking back manually.

Are others out there that do receive email notfications on bugs reported
by them? Is the bugtracker configured to send email notifications?

Kind regards

Sebastian

[1] http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
[2] http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/account_prefs_page.php

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 14 17:00:39 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:00:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW bugtracker notifications?
In-Reply-To: <491D9CD5.70609@skayser.de>
References: <491D9CD5.70609@skayser.de>
Message-ID: <625385e30811140800h1ae21c7bt2c96ce6316e88de5@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Sebastian Kayser <sebastian at skayser.de> wrote:
> However, i noticed that i did not receive any email notifications,
> although the email settings on my account preferences page [2] make me
> believe that i should receive such notifications. I only found out about
> the work being done on the bugs by checking back manually.

We just discovered that no notification was sent to the maintainer
either. It's being worked on.

-- 
/peter

From solaris at jmarki.net  Sun Nov 16 13:05:03 2008
From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:05:03 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
	hash in list of installed packages
Message-ID: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net>

Hi,

(I'm relatively new to Solaris, so pardon me if the solution is
blindingly obvious...)

I'm using csw on my Solaris10 x86 systems, and trying to check for
upgrades. It's didn't work, somehow a hash is injected into the list of
packages.

<snip>
$ pkg-get -U
...

$ pkg-get -u
note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
Installed software packages:
=zZl6 zlib wget textutils slang screen sasl rsync readline pkg_get perl
openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt ncurses nano
libpopt libnet libidn libiconv less isaexec
iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gnupg ggettext gdbm expat curlrt common
bzip2 berkeleydb44 berkeleydb4
ERROR: =zZl6 unrecognized
Perhaps you need to run pkg-get -U
</snip>

Anyway, there shouldn't be any updates: pkg-get compare does not show
any newer packages.

Does anyone have any pointers? Thanks!

Regards,
Junhao

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Nov 17 18:10:36 2008
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:10:36 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] mantis email working again
Message-ID: <20081117091036.I21898@bolthole.com>

Apologies for the lack of service... we believe that mantis(bugtracking)
email should be functional again now.

From solaris at jmarki.net  Tue Nov 18 03:53:07 2008
From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:53:07 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
 hash in list of installed packages
In-Reply-To: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net>
References: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net>
Message-ID: <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>

>Junhao wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> (I'm relatively new to Solaris, so pardon me if the solution is
>> blindingly obvious...)
>> 
>> I'm using csw on my Solaris10 x86 systems, and trying to check for
>> upgrades. It's didn't work, somehow a hash is injected into the list of
>> packages.
>> 
>> <snip>
>> $ pkg-get -U
>> ...
>> 
>> $ pkg-get -u
>> note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
>> Installed software packages:
>> =zZl6 zlib wget textutils slang screen sasl rsync readline pkg_get perl
>> openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt ncurses nano
>> libpopt libnet libidn libiconv less isaexec
>> iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
>> HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gnupg ggettext gdbm expat curlrt common
>> bzip2 berkeleydb44 berkeleydb4
>> ERROR: =zZl6 unrecognized
>> Perhaps you need to run pkg-get -U
>> </snip>
>> 
>> Anyway, there shouldn't be any updates: pkg-get compare does not show
>> any newer packages.
>> 
>> Does anyone have any pointers? Thanks!
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Junhao

Philip Brown wrote:
> Hello,
> i noticed your email about pkg-get on the users list.
>
> I only read it on the web, so replying to there is inconvenient.
>
> It looks like you probably are pointed at a corrupted catalog.
> But it's tough to verify, since you snip the output that shows WHERE you
> are getting your packages from.
>
>

Dear Philip,

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

I was initially using an in-house mirror (created by "rsync -vaAXL
--no-l --delete
rsync://www.ibiblio.org/sun-packages/opencsw/stable/sparc/5.10
/localmirror"). When it failed, I changed to ibiblio and usc mirrors
with the same effect.

Here's the output using usc mirror:

<snip>
bash-3.00# pkg-get -U
Getting catalog...
--2008-11-18 10:35:03--
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/stable/i386/5.10/catalog
Resolving mirrors.usc.edu... 68.181.195.4

Connecting to mirrors.usc.edu|68.181.195.4|:80... connected.

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

Length: 314842 (307K) [text/plain]

Saving to: `catalog'


100%[===============================================================>]
314,842     28.5K/s   in 15s

2008-11-18 10:35:39 (20.7 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [314842/314842]

gpg: Signature made Sat Oct 25 03:10:16 2008 SGT using DSA key ID E12E9D2F
gpg: Good signature from "CSW Distribution Manager <dm at opencsw.org>"
gpg:                 aka "Distribution Manager <dm at blastwave.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 0BF0 9891 9340 86DC EBE3  DDFF 06A1 ED1B E12E
9D2F
Updating catalog file

/var/pkg-get/catalog-mirrors.usc.edu updated


--2008-11-18 10:35:39--
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/stable/i386/5.10/descriptions
Resolving mirrors.usc.edu... 68.181.195.4
Connecting to mirrors.usc.edu|68.181.195.4|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 90031 (88K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `descriptions'

100%[===============================================================>]
90,031      30.7K/s   in 2.9s

2008-11-18 10:35:42 (30.7 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [90031/90031]

Updated description file
bash-3.00# pkg-get -u
note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
Installed software packages:
=zZl6 zlib wget textutils sqlite3 slang screen sasl rsync readline
pkg_get perl openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt
ncurses nano libpopt libnet libidn libiconv libgmp libclamav less
isaexec iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gsed gnupg ggettext gdbm gcc3corert expat
curlrt common clamav bzip2 berkeleydb44 berkeleydb4 apache2rt apache2c
apache2 ap2_prefork
ERROR: =zZl6 unrecognized
Perhaps you need to run pkg-get -U
</snip>

Comparing the differences between the blastwave and opencsw catalogue
files, it appears opencsw catalogue has another "PGP signed" wrapper. Is
this the cause?

Thanks!

Regards,
Junhao


From solaris at jmarki.net  Tue Nov 18 04:14:03 2008
From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:14:03 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
 hash in list of installed packages
In-Reply-To: <20081117190134.A21107@bolthole.com>
References: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net> <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>
	<20081117190134.A21107@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <492232FB.2040203@jmarki.net>

Philip Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Junhao wrote:
>> Comparing the differences between the blastwave and opencsw catalogue
>> files, it appears opencsw catalogue has another "PGP signed" wrapper. Is
>> this the cause?
> 
> no dont think so . which version of pkg get are you using?
> 

Hi Philip,

I'm using version 3.8.4, from the stable repository.

<snip>
bash-3.00# pkginfo -l CSWpkgget
   PKGINST:  CSWpkgget
      NAME:  pkg_get - CSW version of automated package download tool
  CATEGORY:  system
      ARCH:  all
   VERSION:  3.8.4
   BASEDIR:  /opt/csw
    VENDOR:  http://www.blastwave.org/pkg-get.html packaged for CSW by
Philip Brown
      DESC:  A convinient way to automate package installs
    PSTAMP:  hamachi.usc.edu20080108060518
  INSTDATE:  Nov 16 2008 05:43
   HOTLINE:  http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
     EMAIL:  phil at opencsw.org
    STATUS:  completely installed
     FILES:       11 installed pathnames
                   5 shared pathnames
                   7 directories
                   4 executables
                 124 blocks used (approx)
</snip>

Thanks!

Regards,
Junhao

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Nov 18 05:08:45 2008
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:08:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
	hash in list of installed packages
In-Reply-To: <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>;
	from solaris@jmarki.net on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0800
References: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net> <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>
Message-ID: <20081117200845.C21107@bolthole.com>

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Junhao wrote:
> >> I'm using csw on my Solaris10 x86 systems, and trying to check for
> >> upgrades. It's didn't work, somehow a hash is injected into the list of
> >> packages.
> >> 
> >> <snip>
> >> $ pkg-get -U
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> $ pkg-get -u
> >> note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
> >> Installed software packages:
> >> =zZl6 zlib wget textutils slang screen sasl rsync readline pkg_get perl
> >> openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt ncurses nano
> >> libpopt libnet libidn libiconv less isaexec
> >> iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
> >> HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gnupg ggettext gdbm expat curlrt common

none of those strings appear in the catalog.
I suspect you have a corrupted pkginfo database or something.

look for one of those strings in /var/sadm/install/contents.



From laurent at opensolaris.org  Tue Nov  4 14:55:44 2008
From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:55:44 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Updated CUPS?
Message-ID: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>

Hi all,

Any idea if there's going to be an update of the CUPS package? I sent an
email to the maintainer through the web interface, but no answer.

Laurent
-- 
/ Leader de Projet & Communaut?    | I'm working, but not speaking for
\ G11N   http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com
/ FOSUG  http://guses.org          |


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 15:33:00 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:33:00 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Updated CUPS?
In-Reply-To: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
Message-ID: <8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>

Hi Laurent,

Am 04.11.2008 um 14:55 schrieb Laurent Blume:
> Any idea if there's going to be an update of the CUPS package? I  
> sent an
> email to the maintainer through the web interface, but no answer.

The maintainer (Markus Mayer) is already working on it:
   <http://gar.opencsw.org/trac/browser/csw/trunk/net/cups>


Best regards

   -- Dago


From laurent at opensolaris.org  Tue Nov  4 16:21:03 2008
From: laurent at opensolaris.org (Laurent Blume)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:21:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Updated CUPS?
In-Reply-To: <8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>

Dagobert Michelsen a ?crit :
> The maintainer (Markus Mayer) is already working on it:
>    <http://gar.opencsw.org/trac/browser/csw/trunk/net/cups>

Oh, good!

Thanks for the info, Dago!

Laurent
-- 
/ Leader de Projet & Communaut?    | I'm working, but not speaking for
\ G11N   http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com
/ FOSUG  http://guses.org          |


From aaron at ernieball.com  Tue Nov  4 17:23:40 2008
From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:23:40 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>
Message-ID: <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>

Just found out today I can use either of these mirrors:

http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current
or
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable


For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox 
2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.

Am I supposed to make a decision based on that nonsense drama I kind of 
remember reading about a few months ago?


From ggunselm at emporia.edu  Tue Nov  4 17:45:37 2008
From: ggunselm at emporia.edu (Glen Gunselman)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:45:37 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org> <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <491027D1.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu>

 
I think the general recommendation would be to choose one or the other for a given server.
(I think this is stated, or at least hinted at, on the opencsw web site.)
 
have a good day,
Glen
(I, too, would feel more comfortable with less drama and more fact.)
 

>>> Aaron Wilson <aaron at ernieball.com> 11/4/2008 10:23 AM >>>
Just found out today I can use either of these mirrors:

http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current 
or
http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/blastwave.org/unstable 


For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox 
2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.

Am I supposed to make a decision based on that nonsense drama I kind of 
remember reading about a few months ago?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.opencsw.org 
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081104/256c13f6/attachment.html>

From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov  4 17:47:09 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:47:09 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
Message-ID: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>

I just got around to refreshing my blastwave packages.  Unfortunately,
I when pulled down the latest gm4, it pulled in libsigsegv, and the
libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.

Is this a mistake, or has Blastwave moved on and MDed these older
Sparcs?

Thanks,
Rob


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 18:04:11 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:04:11 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
Message-ID: <7F07FBCB-92F9-42B0-95A8-C161843DBFDF@opencsw.org>

Hi Rob,

Am 04.11.2008 um 17:47 schrieb Rob Stampfli:
> I just got around to refreshing my blastwave packages.

Could you please state which mirror you used (where
your pkg-get.conf points to)?

> Unfortunately,
> I when pulled down the latest gm4, it pulled in libsigsegv, and the
> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.
>
> Is this a mistake, or has Blastwave moved on and MDed these older
> Sparcs?

I cannot speak for Blastwave. OpenCSW builds binaries
for Solaris 8 for SPARC, so every machine capable of
running Solaris 8 should be able to execute every package
available on OpenCSW for Solaris 8. If this is not the
case it is considered a bug.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From james at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 18:13:03 2008
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:13:03 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
Message-ID: <20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 04/11/08, 16:47:09, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs:

> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.

It's a bug:
http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=1700



James.


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Nov  4 23:33:25 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:33:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
	<20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <DC4E2143-4F56-4531-99AE-62459C6BC2EB@opencsw.org>

Hi James,

Am 04.11.2008 um 17:13 schrieb James Lee:
> On 04/11/08, 16:47:09, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote  
> regarding
> [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs:
>
>> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
>> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.
>
> It's a bug:
> http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=1700

I moved that into GAR. Please try from
   <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing-bydate.html>

   <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz>
   <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz>

Please let me know if it works or not.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov  4 23:52:45 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:52:45 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs
In-Reply-To: <DC4E2143-4F56-4531-99AE-62459C6BC2EB@opencsw.org>
References: <20081104164709.GA10589@keevey>
	<20081104.17130300.2845845276@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<DC4E2143-4F56-4531-99AE-62459C6BC2EB@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20081104225245.GA12850@keevey>

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:33:25PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> Am 04.11.2008 um 17:13 schrieb James Lee:
> > On 04/11/08, 16:47:09, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote  
> > regarding
> > [csw-users] Warning: libsigseg broken on older Sparcs:
> >
> >> libsigsegv package is compiled for SPARC32PLUS / V8+, which is beyond
> >> the capabilities of my poor little LX to accomodate.
> >
> > It's a bug:
> > http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=1700
> 
> I moved that into GAR. Please try from
>    <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing-bydate.html>
> 
>    <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
> libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz>
>    <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/ 
> libsigsegv-2.6,REV=2008.11.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz>
> 
> Please let me know if it works or not.

Grabbed it from the first URL, and yes, it seems to have fixed the
problem.

Thanks Dago, exp for the fast response!

Rob


From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov  4 23:59:00 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:59:00 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] What's going on with the clamav package?
Message-ID: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>

As long as I'm on a roll here, can anyone shed some light as to
what's going on with the clamav package?  It has not been updated
since February, although there has been about a half-dozen updates
issued by the clamav folks in that timeframe.

Inquiring minds want to know... ;^)

Rob


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Nov  5 00:35:54 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 00:35:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] What's going on with the clamav package?
In-Reply-To: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>
References: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>
Message-ID: <625385e30811041535v21226ebt5771e268d47182a0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:
> As long as I'm on a roll here, can anyone shed some light as to
> what's going on with the clamav package?  It has not been updated
> since February, although there has been about a half-dozen updates
> issued by the clamav folks in that timeframe.
>
> Inquiring minds want to know... ;^)

ClamAV was one Alex Moore's packages and he's retired as a maintainer.
I have an interest in several of his packages and have done a test
build of ClamAV but shifted to release SpamAssassin instead (in
opencsw.org/testing now). I will take up ClamAV again now when they
have released 0.94.1 but I've been busy with pkgutil until now.

-- 
/peter


From res at colnet.cmhnet.org  Wed Nov  5 00:50:18 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:50:18 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] What's going on with the clamav package?
In-Reply-To: <625385e30811041535v21226ebt5771e268d47182a0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20081104225859.GB12850@keevey>
	<625385e30811041535v21226ebt5771e268d47182a0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20081104235018.GA13128@keevey>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:35:54AM +0100, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Rob Stampfli <res at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:
> > As long as I'm on a roll here, can anyone shed some light as to
> > what's going on with the clamav package?  It has not been updated
> > since February, although there has been about a half-dozen updates
> > issued by the clamav folks in that timeframe.
> >
> > Inquiring minds want to know... ;^)
> 
> ClamAV was one Alex Moore's packages and he's retired as a maintainer.
> I have an interest in several of his packages and have done a test
> build of ClamAV but shifted to release SpamAssassin instead (in
> opencsw.org/testing now). I will take up ClamAV again now when they
> have released 0.94.1 but I've been busy with pkgutil until now.

Thanks, Peter.  I hadn't realized Alex had retired.  He surely did
quite a lot for Blastwave, and that will be a loss for the community.

Thanks for agreeing to pick up the slack.  If there is anything I can
do to assist you, please let me know.

Rob


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Nov  5 21:59:33 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:59:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <491027D1.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>
	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>
	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org> <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
	<491027D1.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu>
Message-ID: <F71425FD-282A-4A23-A0D2-A1B7994174CC@opencsw.org>

Hi Glen,

Am 04.11.2008 um 17:45 schrieb Glen Gunselman:
> (I, too, would feel more comfortable with less drama and more fact.)

The drama is over, facts now starting.

> For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox
> 2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.

OpenCSW now has firefox 2.0.17, too :-)

> Am I supposed to make a decision based on that nonsense drama I kind  
> of
> remember reading about a few months ago?

No. Make your decision which repository fits your needs best.
If you miss anything on OpenCSW please post to users or,
even better, get involved.


Best regards

   -- Dago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081105/5ac3f43f/attachment.html>

From dclarke at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  5 22:13:41 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
Message-ID: <57997.10.0.66.17.1225919621.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org>


> Hi Glen,
>
> No. Make your decision which repository fits your needs best.
> If you miss anything on OpenCSW please post to users or,
> even better, get involved.
>

Anything I see of value will get released from Blastwave anyways so it
makes little difference. thus :

+------+---------------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| id   | pkgname       | pathname                                 |
pkg_md5sum                       |
+------+---------------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| 4184 | CSWlibsigsegv | /opt/csw/include/sigsegv.h               |
b0fb035b8fc9728ff3ec905b8eecb4ea |
| 4185 | CSWlibsigsegv | /opt/csw/lib/libsigsegv.so.0.0.0         |
b0fb035b8fc9728ff3ec905b8eecb4ea |
| 4186 | CSWlibsigsegv | /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libsigsegv.so.0.0.0 |
b0fb035b8fc9728ff3ec905b8eecb4ea |
+------+---------------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+

Dennis Clarke



From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Nov  6 09:08:54 2008
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:08:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW Real Life Meeting
In-Reply-To: <73D64564-EE88-4B08-AA7A-E9C6349639CD@opencsw.org>
References: <73D64564-EE88-4B08-AA7A-E9C6349639CD@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <ECDBA947-EAC0-444D-B897-E843D7FDF136@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 22.10.2008 um 23:13 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> there will be a real-life meeting of OpenCSW maintainers
> and users to create a OpenCSW Foundation on 11/29/2008
> in Zurich, Switzerland. Please see
>   <http://blog.opencsw.org/>
> for details.

FYI: The meeting has been rescheduled to Saturday,
6. December.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Wed Nov 12 21:14:47 2008
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:14:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Apcupsd package
Message-ID: <491B3937.6060401@opencsw.org>

Hello,

I've packaged Apcupsd http://www.apcupsd.org/ and it's now on testing.

http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/apcupsd-3.14.4,REV=2008.11.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing/apcupsd-3.14.4,REV=2008.11.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Nov 12 22:13:54 2008
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:13:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Which one am I supposed to use?
In-Reply-To: <4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
References: <49105460.2000203@opensolaris.org>	<8C0BC92D-15FF-44A2-AF33-90EE4C48E706@opencsw.org>	<4910685F.1030205@opensolaris.org>
	<4910770C.2070608@ernieball.com>
Message-ID: <491B4712.7090505@wbonnet.net>

Hi


> For the most part they seem the same but the blastwave one has firefox 
> 2.0.17 and the opencsw one has newer apache and php5 packages.
>   
I confirm that Firefox version for both Blastwave and OpenCSW are the same.

Regards,

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris 
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Nov 13 11:10:33 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:10:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.2 released
Message-ID: <625385e30811130210v65f630d1v1712bea116e8d410@mail.gmail.com>

Yesterday I submitted pkgutil 1.2 for release into current/unstable.
It should now have reached all the mirrors.

There's quite a lot of new stuff, this is the change log from the readme file:

- Temp site (-t) does no longer replace the mirror defined in
pkgutil.conf. It instead is considered the primary location and the
mirror defined in pkgutil.conf is considered the secondary. That means
you can point -t to your own repository of packages that are built
with dependencies to CSW and it will fetch all packages necessary
regardless of their location
- Better MD5 support for Solaris 8 and 9
- Arguments to -a and -c are now treated like filters so "pkgutil -a
bind dhcp" equals "pkgutil -a | egrep -i 'bind|dhcp'"
- Changed version info to be -v instead of -V
- Added -V (--syscheck) to show info about binaries and more that
pkgutil needs to support all features
- Perldoc/man page updated with configuration file info
- Search for gzip in more places
- Fixed bug when reporting package missing in catalog (Dagobert Michelsen)
- Bundled wget binaries moved to /opt/csw/libexec/pkgutil
- bldcat (build catalog) supports CSW_CATEGORY
- bldcat now extracts data in a more dependable way
- chkcat (check catalog) checks for duplicates in catalog
- chkcat with option -v checks the catalog data against actual package
files if they are located in the same directory as the catalog parsed

The first one is the big one if you make your own packages. I combined
a few features to upgrade one server to pkgutil 1.2 before it had been
released by placing the package on a web server I control, using
bldcat to make a catalog for it and then using pkgutil -t to combine
my web servers catalog with the official one (specified in
pkgutil.conf). The result is that when I want to upgrade pkgutil it
finds pkgutil 1.2 on my web server and downloads it from there.

With just one package it would of course have been easier to just
pkgadd it manually :-) but you get the idea that you can make your own
catalogs that combined with the CSW catalog makes it easy to install
your own software even if it depends on CSW packages.

The wiki site is updated with more info and examples:
http://wiki.opencsw.org/pkgutil.

Happy upgrading! :-)

-- 
/peter


From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Nov 14 02:22:49 2008
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:22:49 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] pkg-get 4.0beta
Message-ID: <20081113172249.K72975@bolthole.com>

FYI: at long last, I've put up another pkg-get 4.0 beta package, at

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkg_get-4.0,REV=2008.11.12.beta-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg

comments are hereby invited.


I actually wrote most of this update in the beginning of this year, but got
sidelined releasing and developing it, having become Rather Busy needing
to rewrite almost from scratch, key pieces of CSW infrastructure that
I was denied access to :-(
But now that we are happily stable in that area,I can get back to
pkg-get development.

I have finally gotten the time to address almost all bugs and feature
requests filed against it. 



From william at wbonnet.net  Fri Nov 14 07:50:40 2008
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:50:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox 2.0.0.18 is available
Message-ID: <491D1FC0.2020107@wbonnet.net>

Hi,

The latest update of Firefox (version 2.0.0.18) is now available from 
testing. This release includes several security fixes ( 
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox20.html#firefox2.0.0.18 
). The release notes are availables from this place ( 
http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/2.0.0.18/releasenotes/ ).

This update should be pushed to unstable soon. Thanks for your feedbacks 
if you experience any problem with this testing version.

Best regards,

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris 
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From sebastian at skayser.de  Fri Nov 14 16:44:21 2008
From: sebastian at skayser.de (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:44:21 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW bugtracker notifications?
Message-ID: <491D9CD5.70609@skayser.de>

Hi *,

i filed some bugs using the OpenCSW bugtracker [1] and Phil has done
some work on them recently, which is great.

However, i noticed that i did not receive any email notifications,
although the email settings on my account preferences page [2] make me
believe that i should receive such notifications. I only found out about
the work being done on the bugs by checking back manually.

Are others out there that do receive email notfications on bugs reported
by them? Is the bugtracker configured to send email notifications?

Kind regards

Sebastian

[1] http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
[2] http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/account_prefs_page.php


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 14 17:00:39 2008
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:00:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW bugtracker notifications?
In-Reply-To: <491D9CD5.70609@skayser.de>
References: <491D9CD5.70609@skayser.de>
Message-ID: <625385e30811140800h1ae21c7bt2c96ce6316e88de5@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Sebastian Kayser <sebastian at skayser.de> wrote:
> However, i noticed that i did not receive any email notifications,
> although the email settings on my account preferences page [2] make me
> believe that i should receive such notifications. I only found out about
> the work being done on the bugs by checking back manually.

We just discovered that no notification was sent to the maintainer
either. It's being worked on.

-- 
/peter


From solaris at jmarki.net  Sun Nov 16 13:05:03 2008
From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:05:03 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
	hash in list of installed packages
Message-ID: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net>

Hi,

(I'm relatively new to Solaris, so pardon me if the solution is
blindingly obvious...)

I'm using csw on my Solaris10 x86 systems, and trying to check for
upgrades. It's didn't work, somehow a hash is injected into the list of
packages.

<snip>
$ pkg-get -U
...

$ pkg-get -u
note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
Installed software packages:
=zZl6 zlib wget textutils slang screen sasl rsync readline pkg_get perl
openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt ncurses nano
libpopt libnet libidn libiconv less isaexec
iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gnupg ggettext gdbm expat curlrt common
bzip2 berkeleydb44 berkeleydb4
ERROR: =zZl6 unrecognized
Perhaps you need to run pkg-get -U
</snip>

Anyway, there shouldn't be any updates: pkg-get compare does not show
any newer packages.

Does anyone have any pointers? Thanks!

Regards,
Junhao


From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Nov 17 18:10:36 2008
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:10:36 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] mantis email working again
Message-ID: <20081117091036.I21898@bolthole.com>

Apologies for the lack of service... we believe that mantis(bugtracking)
email should be functional again now.


From solaris at jmarki.net  Tue Nov 18 03:53:07 2008
From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:53:07 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
 hash in list of installed packages
In-Reply-To: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net>
References: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net>
Message-ID: <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>

>Junhao wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> (I'm relatively new to Solaris, so pardon me if the solution is
>> blindingly obvious...)
>> 
>> I'm using csw on my Solaris10 x86 systems, and trying to check for
>> upgrades. It's didn't work, somehow a hash is injected into the list of
>> packages.
>> 
>> <snip>
>> $ pkg-get -U
>> ...
>> 
>> $ pkg-get -u
>> note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
>> Installed software packages:
>> =zZl6 zlib wget textutils slang screen sasl rsync readline pkg_get perl
>> openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt ncurses nano
>> libpopt libnet libidn libiconv less isaexec
>> iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
>> HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gnupg ggettext gdbm expat curlrt common
>> bzip2 berkeleydb44 berkeleydb4
>> ERROR: =zZl6 unrecognized
>> Perhaps you need to run pkg-get -U
>> </snip>
>> 
>> Anyway, there shouldn't be any updates: pkg-get compare does not show
>> any newer packages.
>> 
>> Does anyone have any pointers? Thanks!
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Junhao

Philip Brown wrote:
> Hello,
> i noticed your email about pkg-get on the users list.
>
> I only read it on the web, so replying to there is inconvenient.
>
> It looks like you probably are pointed at a corrupted catalog.
> But it's tough to verify, since you snip the output that shows WHERE you
> are getting your packages from.
>
>

Dear Philip,

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

I was initially using an in-house mirror (created by "rsync -vaAXL
--no-l --delete
rsync://www.ibiblio.org/sun-packages/opencsw/stable/sparc/5.10
/localmirror"). When it failed, I changed to ibiblio and usc mirrors
with the same effect.

Here's the output using usc mirror:

<snip>
bash-3.00# pkg-get -U
Getting catalog...
--2008-11-18 10:35:03--
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/stable/i386/5.10/catalog
Resolving mirrors.usc.edu... 68.181.195.4

Connecting to mirrors.usc.edu|68.181.195.4|:80... connected.

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

Length: 314842 (307K) [text/plain]

Saving to: `catalog'


100%[===============================================================>]
314,842     28.5K/s   in 15s

2008-11-18 10:35:39 (20.7 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [314842/314842]

gpg: Signature made Sat Oct 25 03:10:16 2008 SGT using DSA key ID E12E9D2F
gpg: Good signature from "CSW Distribution Manager <dm at opencsw.org>"
gpg:                 aka "Distribution Manager <dm at blastwave.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 0BF0 9891 9340 86DC EBE3  DDFF 06A1 ED1B E12E
9D2F
Updating catalog file

/var/pkg-get/catalog-mirrors.usc.edu updated


--2008-11-18 10:35:39--
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/stable/i386/5.10/descriptions
Resolving mirrors.usc.edu... 68.181.195.4
Connecting to mirrors.usc.edu|68.181.195.4|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 90031 (88K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `descriptions'

100%[===============================================================>]
90,031      30.7K/s   in 2.9s

2008-11-18 10:35:42 (30.7 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [90031/90031]

Updated description file
bash-3.00# pkg-get -u
note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
Installed software packages:
=zZl6 zlib wget textutils sqlite3 slang screen sasl rsync readline
pkg_get perl openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt
ncurses nano libpopt libnet libidn libiconv libgmp libclamav less
isaexec iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gsed gnupg ggettext gdbm gcc3corert expat
curlrt common clamav bzip2 berkeleydb44 berkeleydb4 apache2rt apache2c
apache2 ap2_prefork
ERROR: =zZl6 unrecognized
Perhaps you need to run pkg-get -U
</snip>

Comparing the differences between the blastwave and opencsw catalogue
files, it appears opencsw catalogue has another "PGP signed" wrapper. Is
this the cause?

Thanks!

Regards,
Junhao



From solaris at jmarki.net  Tue Nov 18 04:14:03 2008
From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:14:03 +0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
 hash in list of installed packages
In-Reply-To: <20081117190134.A21107@bolthole.com>
References: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net> <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>
	<20081117190134.A21107@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <492232FB.2040203@jmarki.net>

Philip Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Junhao wrote:
>> Comparing the differences between the blastwave and opencsw catalogue
>> files, it appears opencsw catalogue has another "PGP signed" wrapper. Is
>> this the cause?
> 
> no dont think so . which version of pkg get are you using?
> 

Hi Philip,

I'm using version 3.8.4, from the stable repository.

<snip>
bash-3.00# pkginfo -l CSWpkgget
   PKGINST:  CSWpkgget
      NAME:  pkg_get - CSW version of automated package download tool
  CATEGORY:  system
      ARCH:  all
   VERSION:  3.8.4
   BASEDIR:  /opt/csw
    VENDOR:  http://www.blastwave.org/pkg-get.html packaged for CSW by
Philip Brown
      DESC:  A convinient way to automate package installs
    PSTAMP:  hamachi.usc.edu20080108060518
  INSTDATE:  Nov 16 2008 05:43
   HOTLINE:  http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
     EMAIL:  phil at opencsw.org
    STATUS:  completely installed
     FILES:       11 installed pathnames
                   5 shared pathnames
                   7 directories
                   4 executables
                 124 blocks used (approx)
</snip>

Thanks!

Regards,
Junhao


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Nov 18 05:08:45 2008
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:08:45 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] "pkg-get -u" does not work,
	hash in list of installed packages
In-Reply-To: <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>;
	from solaris@jmarki.net on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0800
References: <49200C6F.9070506@jmarki.net> <49222E13.8060701@jmarki.net>
Message-ID: <20081117200845.C21107@bolthole.com>

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Junhao wrote:
> >> I'm using csw on my Solaris10 x86 systems, and trying to check for
> >> upgrades. It's didn't work, somehow a hash is injected into the list of
> >> packages.
> >> 
> >> <snip>
> >> $ pkg-get -U
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> $ pkg-get -u
> >> note: upgrading ALL INSTALLED PACKAGES
> >> Installed software packages:
> >> =zZl6 zlib wget textutils slang screen sasl rsync readline pkg_get perl
> >> openssl_utils openssl_rt openssl_devel openssl openldap_rt ncurses nano
> >> libpopt libnet libidn libiconv less isaexec
> >> iD8DBQFJAhSRBqHtG+EunS8RAkoMAJ9Bpf5uQwZEYylu0Eg3oA/CbvDnHQCdG9jg
> >> HVHeU5BYROuFa0/eDfiYCjw= Hash: gnupg ggettext gdbm expat curlrt common

none of those strings appear in the catalog.
I suspect you have a corrupted pkginfo database or something.

look for one of those strings in /var/sadm/install/contents.