From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com Mon Feb 2 22:42:29 2009 From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:42:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install Message-ID: I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": Permission denied See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace Abort (core dumped) My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even see the binary installed. Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? J -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090202/b3443c58/attachment.htm From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Feb 3 00:19:15 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:19:15 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> Hello, dbus-uuidgen is part or CSWdbus Need a few things to help track this down: Did you install the packages with pkg-get/pkgutil? Can you attach the output of the following commands: ls -l /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus pkginfo -l CSWdbus CSWdbusglib CSWlibdbus CSWpidgin Thanks, Chad JL Picard wrote: > I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation > of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The > packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: > > process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to > read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": > Permission denied > See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. > D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace > Abort (core dumped) > > My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen > (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even > see the binary installed. > > Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? > > J > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Feb 3 00:28:13 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:28:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install In-Reply-To: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> References: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4987818D.6030305@opencsw.org> Did some more digging, looks like dbus-uuidgen is run in the postinstall for CSWdbus. CSWpidgin only depends on CSWlibdbus. Quick fix for your situation should be a 'pkg-get -i dbus' I'll get a new version of pidgin packaged up with a new dependency on CSWdbus. Sorry for the troubles, Chad Chad Harp wrote: > Hello, dbus-uuidgen is part or CSWdbus > > Need a few things to help track this down: > > > Did you install the packages with pkg-get/pkgutil? > > Can you attach the output of the following commands: > > ls -l /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus > pkginfo -l CSWdbus CSWdbusglib CSWlibdbus CSWpidgin > > > Thanks, Chad > > JL Picard wrote: >> I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation >> of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The >> packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: >> >> process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to >> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": >> Permission denied >> See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. >> D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace >> Abort (core dumped) >> >> My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen >> (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even >> see the binary installed. >> >> Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? >> >> J >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com Tue Feb 3 07:09:00 2009 From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:09:00 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] DBUS Install Script issue/problem (formerly: Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install) References: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> <4987818D.6030305@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Thanks Chad, The new install of dbus package almost nailed it, however, there was still was still one minor problem,more likely to do with the DBUS package install than pidgin. After installing DBUS, I ran pidgin on got this error again: process 11375: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": Permission denied This time the machine-id file did exist, but unavailable to non-root users, since permissions on the directory was: > ls -arlt /opt/csw/var/ total 21 drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 2 Jan 25 14:45 proftpd drwxr-xr-x 3 root bin 3 Jan 25 14:53 spool drwxr-xr-x 3 root bin 3 Jan 25 14:53 svc drwxr-xr-x 17 root bin 20 Feb 2 16:05 .. drwxrwx--- 4 root bin 4 Feb 3 00:50 lib drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 7 Feb 3 00:50 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Feb 3 00:50 run Once I ran the following: chmod 775 /opt/csw/var/lib pidgin seems to work. JL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Harp" To: "questions and discussions" Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install > Did some more digging, looks like dbus-uuidgen is run in the postinstall > for CSWdbus. CSWpidgin only depends on CSWlibdbus. > > Quick fix for your situation should be a 'pkg-get -i dbus' > > I'll get a new version of pidgin packaged up with a new dependency on > CSWdbus. > > Sorry for the troubles, Chad > > Chad Harp wrote: >> Hello, dbus-uuidgen is part or CSWdbus >> >> Need a few things to help track this down: >> >> >> Did you install the packages with pkg-get/pkgutil? >> >> Can you attach the output of the following commands: >> >> ls -l /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus >> pkginfo -l CSWdbus CSWdbusglib CSWlibdbus CSWpidgin >> >> >> Thanks, Chad >> >> JL Picard wrote: >>> I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation >>> of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The >>> packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: >>> >>> process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to >>> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": >>> Permission denied >>> See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. >>> D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a >>> backtrace >>> Abort (core dumped) >>> >>> My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen >>> (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even >>> see the binary installed. >>> >>> Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? >>> >>> J >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From william at wbonnet.net Tue Feb 3 10:22:32 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:22:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] DBUS Install Script issue/problem (formerly: Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install) In-Reply-To: References: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> <4987818D.6030305@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49880CD8.8000304@wbonnet.net> Hi > After installing DBUS, I ran pidgin on got this error again: > process 11375: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to > read machine uuid: > Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": Permission denied > > DBus (and glib dbus) updates are available, i'll release them today to testing. cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Feb 4 18:02:59 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:02:59 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ruby in testing Message-ID: <1233766867-sup-9489@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've resolved the rdoc issue with the ruby packaging that saw different files generated for the various platforms. New packages for 1.8.7p72 are now available in testing. Let me know if you spot any problems with these. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090204/7b96559b/attachment.asc From dam at opencsw.org Sat Feb 7 16:06:34 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:06:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium Message-ID: Dear users, the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism for user requests. The following solutions have been proposed: - Mailing list (that how it is now) - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) - Web forum (phpBB) - Web forum (other, please state which and why) - Chat - Something we forgot to mention? Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually needed. Best regards -- Dago (Secretary of the board) From harpchad at opencsw.org Sat Feb 7 16:09:04 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:09:04 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Web forum (phpBB) From mwatters at opencsw.org Sat Feb 7 16:42:45 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:42:45 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <498DABF5.6000107@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 web forum (phpBB) IRC create #opencsw on irc.freenode.net (Formerly OpenProjects.net) Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Dear users, > > the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki > infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism > for user requests. > > The following solutions have been proposed: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) > - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) > - Web forum (phpBB) > - Web forum (other, please state which and why) > - Chat > - Something we forgot to mention? > > Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually > needed. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago (Secretary of the board) > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmNq/UACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfPEQCdEAsJRxtNjckTXUjGP/Q/CBDC vZAAoKBm1xn3s0ir8m4qwOWLb9+lB9/y =JcQT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From lucian at lastdot.org Sat Feb 7 20:46:09 2009 From: lucian at lastdot.org (lucian at lastdot.org) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:46:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <498DE501.3010009@lastdot.org> On 02/07/2009 03:06 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Dear users, > > the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki > infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism > for user requests. > > The following solutions have been proposed: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) Mailing lists. They are the proven way to do this kind of things. All the big names do it this way (kernel.org, freebsd, and who knows, maybe even microsoft). > - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) > - Web forum (phpBB) > - Web forum (other, please state which and why) > - Chat > - Something we forgot to mention? > > Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually > needed. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago (Secretary of the board) > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From jeff at cjsa.com Sat Feb 7 22:17:54 2009 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 21:17:54 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium References: <498DE501.3010009@lastdot.org> Message-ID: On 02/07/2009 03:06 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Dear users, > > the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki > infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism > for user requests. I support the current mailing list. Regards, -- Jeff From ggunselm at emporia.edu Sun Feb 8 02:33:41 2009 From: ggunselm at emporia.edu (Glen Gunselman) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:33:41 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <498DE215.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu> - Mailing list (that how it is now) Mailing list is the only option that has any meaning to me. Glen Gunselman Systems Software Specialist TCS Emporia State University >>> Dagobert Michelsen 02/07/09 9:06 AM >>> Dear users, the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism for user requests. The following solutions have been proposed: - Mailing list (that how it is now) - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) - Web forum (phpBB) - Web forum (other, please state which and why) - Chat - Something we forgot to mention? Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually needed. Best regards -- Dago (Secretary of the board) _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090207/da7fc41a/attachment.htm From james at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 12:39:44 2009 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:39:44 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 07/02/09, 15:06:34, Dagobert Michelsen wrote regarding [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) +1 > - Something we forgot to mention? NNTP newsgroup From pfelecan at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 18:45:55 2009 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:45:55 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> (James Lee's message of "Sun\, 08 Feb 2009 11\:39\:44 GMT") References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> Message-ID: James Lee writes: > On 07/02/09, 15:06:34, Dagobert Michelsen wrote regarding > [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium: > >> - Mailing list (that how it is now) > > +1 +1 >> - Something we forgot to mention? > > NNTP newsgroup +1 -- Peter From ihsan at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 19:40:47 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:40:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> Message-ID: <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Am 8.2.2009 12:39 Uhr, James Lee schrieb: >> - Mailing list (that how it is now) > > +1 > >> - Something we forgot to mention? > > NNTP newsgroup NNTP access to the OpenCSW mailing list is already available trhought Gmane. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com Sun Feb 8 22:26:14 2009 From: floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com (Floris Bruynooghe) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:26:14 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090208212614.GA5198@laurie.devork> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following solutions have been proposed: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) +1 > - Chat IRC could be nice, but not too fussed. Regards Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org From bonivart at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 22:34:36 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:34:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: <20090208212614.GA5198@laurie.devork> References: <20090208212614.GA5198@laurie.devork> Message-ID: <625385e30902081334i7f20a8fepf4f062ae84a6d23@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> The following solutions have been proposed: >> - Mailing list (that how it is now) > > +1 > >> - Chat > > IRC could be nice, but not too fussed. We actually already have IRC, there's an #opencsw channel at freenode.net, but I don't think it's announced anywhere. -- /peter From jeff at cjsa.com Mon Feb 9 00:57:09 2009 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:57:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <200902082357.n18Nv9Al008891@cjsa.cjsa.com> In local.csw.users you write: >Am 8.2.2009 12:39 Uhr, James Lee schrieb: >>> - Mailing list (that how it is now) >> >> +1 >> >>> - Something we forgot to mention? >> >> NNTP newsgroup >NNTP access to the OpenCSW mailing list is already available trhought Gmane. I'm already feeding the mailing lists into a local newsgroup on my machine with followups/replies mailed back to the list by the news system. (C news) Regards, -- Jeff From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com Tue Feb 10 18:43:35 2009 From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:43:35 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] CSW LSOF package no longer works in Sol 10/Sparc/T5240 Setup References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Message-ID: After installing the LSOF package on a new install of the latest Solaris 10 revision on a T5240 server, LSOF no longer seems to work and I see a lot of msgs like the following, when I run "/opt/csw/bin/lsof -i": no TCP/UDP/IP information available A quick test with the latest version of LSOF on www.sunfreeware.com for Sol 10 seems to work fine. Perhaps there is a requirement for a specific Sol10 package for LSOF now? From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Feb 16 03:15:14 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:15:14 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] rubygems 1.3.1 in testing Message-ID: <1234750330-sup-8857@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've packaged the most recent release of rubygems and placed it in testing. It seems to work on my systems with some light testing. It's a pretty big jump from the previous release though and I don't have any systems running that version to test the update against. To the best of my knowledge, any changes in the gemspec files should be handled cleanly, so this new version should see your old gems and work with them without problems...again though, I'm not able to test this myself. Feedback welcome. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090215/28542e88/attachment.asc From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Mon Feb 16 09:18:06 2009 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:18:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] WARNING: upgrade problem with last openssh package under Solaris 10 Message-ID: <4999213E.7000407@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Hi, The previous openssh packages were incorrectly pushed in the csw repository tree: the solaris 8 package was pushed in the solaris 10 tree instead of the solaris 10 one. As a side effect, with the current package, stopping openssh under Solaris 10 kills all ssh connections. The problem will be solved with the next package release, which will soon land in the repository, but the upgrade will not go smoothly as the previous ssh processes will be stopped during the operation, hence killing all ssh connections. So if you perform the upgrade from an ssh connection, this connection will be killed, the ssh package will be left in a uninstalled state and you will not be able to log again on your server using ssh. To avoid this problem: - either perform the upgrade from the console or using another remote shell - or follow this procedure: * launch manually the openssh daemon on a non-standard port: /opt/csw/sbin/sshd -p 2022 * connect to your server by ssh on this port: ssh -p 2022 yourserver * perform the upgrade from this connection The openssh daemon manually launched will not be killed allowing you to perform the upgrade safely. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by this bug. Yann From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Feb 16 17:37:33 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:37:33 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] WARNING: upgrade problem with last openssh package under Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <4999213E.7000407@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <4999213E.7000407@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <4999964D.7010409@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 the problem lies in the pre-remove although I don't have a copy for solaris 8 I can look at. The workaround I have used in the past for this problem is as follows: first, ssh into the system, sudo root cd /var/sadm/pkgs/CSWossh/install cp preremove ~/ # to keep a copy for cleanup edit the preremove script in install and before any other code put exit 0 this will cause the package to skip the pre-remove as successful. then you can pkgrm the new package without losing your ssh connections. before adding the "new" package, walk yourself through the original pre-remove and cleanup the same things it did. i.e. /var/run/sshd.pid et.al. then you can pkg-add your new version and as people disconnect and re-connect their ssh version will be upgraded. - -- Mike Yann Rouillard wrote: > Hi, > > The previous openssh packages were incorrectly pushed in the csw > repository tree: the solaris 8 package was pushed in the solaris 10 tree > instead of the solaris 10 one. > > As a side effect, with the current package, stopping openssh under > Solaris 10 kills all ssh connections. > > The problem will be solved with the next package release, which will > soon land in the repository, but the upgrade will not go smoothly as the > previous ssh processes will be stopped during the operation, hence > killing all ssh connections. > > So if you perform the upgrade from an ssh connection, this connection > will be killed, the ssh package will be left in a uninstalled state and > you will not be able to log again on your server using ssh. > > To avoid this problem: > > - either perform the upgrade from the console or using another remote > shell > > - or follow this procedure: > > * launch manually the openssh daemon on a non-standard port: > /opt/csw/sbin/sshd -p 2022 > > * connect to your server by ssh on this port: > ssh -p 2022 yourserver > > * perform the upgrade from this connection > > The openssh daemon manually launched will not be killed allowing you > to perform the upgrade safely. > > > I apologize for any inconvenience caused by this bug. > > Yann > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmZlk0ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxez1QCfZN+jkMuDPTG1420NMcqM64Dy wPwAoNLtbi9fGL8BjhQ6EDqyODbD5CdQ =5PNk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ihsan at opencsw.org Fri Feb 20 20:46:00 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:46:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Apache 2.2.11 in testing Message-ID: <499F0878.2040905@opencsw.org> Hello, Apache 2.2.11 is now available on http://www.opencsw.org/testing/ . ap2_prefork-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_suexec-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_worker-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz apache2_devel-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz apache2c-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz apache2rt-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_prefork-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_suexec-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_worker-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz apache2_devel-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz apache2c-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz apache2rt-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From hson at opencsw.org Sun Feb 22 02:39:50 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:39:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New versions of exiftool, libexif, libiptcdata, librsvg, ilmbase and openexr in /testing Message-ID: <49A0ACE6.3070508@opencsw.org> exiftool: - Update to 7.69 - Built with gar libexif: - Built with gar libiptcdata: - Built with gar librsvg: - Update to 2.22.3 (same as old testing-package, but without static libraries and with old .so-file for compatibility) - Built with gar ilmbase: - New package which openexr needs (upstream split into two packages openexr: - Update to 1.6.1 - Built with gar Downloadable from http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Feb 22 17:54:54 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:54:54 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] new ruby packages in testing Message-ID: <1235321631-sup-6561@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, There are new ruby packages in testing. These packages address an issue with a missing static library (libruby-static.a) that some extensions require to build. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090222/17c36026/attachment.asc From hson at opencsw.org Mon Feb 23 02:14:45 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:14:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New imagemagick package in testing Message-ID: <49A1F885.5090501@opencsw.org> Changes: - Update to 6.4.9-6 - Built with DJVU, DPS and EXR support - Included old libraries for backward compatibility - Built using gar Download from http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html Since this is a large jump from the old version and due to the vast number of file format coders, I would like to get as many as possible to test the package before I release it public. From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Feb 26 17:00:59 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:00:59 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ruby packages in testing Message-ID: <1235663912-sup-4053@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, There are new ruby packages in testing. These are a response to the lack of the libruby-static.a file bug that was created last week. I've now added a rubydev package that contains the header files, mkmf module and the static library that modules (may) use. This is more in line with ruby distros from other package repos. Please test this if you're interested and send feedback to me if you've got any. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Feb 27 17:34:48 2009 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (ghenry) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:34:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] is CSWdhcpd fully functionnal? Message-ID: <49A81628.6080701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i just upgrade from release 3 to 4, and i'm not sure that everything is ok. With release 3, a snoop shows: t2000-root% snoop port 67 Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) 192.168.1.84 -> t2000 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST t2000 -> 192.168.1.84 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER t2000 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER t2000 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST t2000 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM t2000 -> 192.168.1.242 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM but with release 4: fury-root% snoop port 67 Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER i ran dhcpd in debug mode, and i never see the client appearing in the logs. Is it possible to stay at release 3, but with SMF enabled? thanks in advance, gerard From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Feb 27 18:15:53 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:15:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] is CSWdhcpd fully functionnal? In-Reply-To: <49A81628.6080701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <49A81628.6080701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <625385e30902270915w370ff027h15078fcd2b6c559f@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, ghenry wrote: > hello all, > i just upgrade from release 3 to 4, and i'm not sure that everything is ok. > With release 3, a snoop shows: > t2000-root% snoop port 67 > Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) > 192.168.1.84 -> t2000 ? ? ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> 192.168.1.84 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK > 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> 192.168.1.242 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK > 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM > > but with release 4: > fury-root% snoop port 67 > Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > > > i ran dhcpd in debug mode, and i never see the client appearing in the logs. I'm not really sure what you want to demonstrate above, is it a problem with your logs or with your clients not getting IP addresses? Did you have a working configuration with version 3 that now doesn't work with version 4? I upgraded from 3 to 4 with no configuration changes and it works. > Is it possible to stay at release 3, but with SMF enabled? You may be able to keep the manifest and service script, they are located in /var/opt/csw/svc. If you go back to v3 you can then import the manifest manually. -- /peter From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com Mon Feb 2 22:42:29 2009 From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:42:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install Message-ID: I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": Permission denied See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace Abort (core dumped) My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even see the binary installed. Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? J -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Feb 3 00:19:15 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:19:15 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> Hello, dbus-uuidgen is part or CSWdbus Need a few things to help track this down: Did you install the packages with pkg-get/pkgutil? Can you attach the output of the following commands: ls -l /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus pkginfo -l CSWdbus CSWdbusglib CSWlibdbus CSWpidgin Thanks, Chad JL Picard wrote: > I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation > of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The > packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: > > process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to > read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": > Permission denied > See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. > D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace > Abort (core dumped) > > My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen > (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even > see the binary installed. > > Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? > > J > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Feb 3 00:28:13 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:28:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install In-Reply-To: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> References: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4987818D.6030305@opencsw.org> Did some more digging, looks like dbus-uuidgen is run in the postinstall for CSWdbus. CSWpidgin only depends on CSWlibdbus. Quick fix for your situation should be a 'pkg-get -i dbus' I'll get a new version of pidgin packaged up with a new dependency on CSWdbus. Sorry for the troubles, Chad Chad Harp wrote: > Hello, dbus-uuidgen is part or CSWdbus > > Need a few things to help track this down: > > > Did you install the packages with pkg-get/pkgutil? > > Can you attach the output of the following commands: > > ls -l /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus > pkginfo -l CSWdbus CSWdbusglib CSWlibdbus CSWpidgin > > > Thanks, Chad > > JL Picard wrote: >> I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation >> of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The >> packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: >> >> process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to >> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": >> Permission denied >> See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. >> D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a backtrace >> Abort (core dumped) >> >> My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen >> (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even >> see the binary installed. >> >> Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? >> >> J >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com Tue Feb 3 07:09:00 2009 From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:09:00 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] DBUS Install Script issue/problem (formerly: Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install) References: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> <4987818D.6030305@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Thanks Chad, The new install of dbus package almost nailed it, however, there was still was still one minor problem,more likely to do with the DBUS package install than pidgin. After installing DBUS, I ran pidgin on got this error again: process 11375: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": Permission denied This time the machine-id file did exist, but unavailable to non-root users, since permissions on the directory was: > ls -arlt /opt/csw/var/ total 21 drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 2 Jan 25 14:45 proftpd drwxr-xr-x 3 root bin 3 Jan 25 14:53 spool drwxr-xr-x 3 root bin 3 Jan 25 14:53 svc drwxr-xr-x 17 root bin 20 Feb 2 16:05 .. drwxrwx--- 4 root bin 4 Feb 3 00:50 lib drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 7 Feb 3 00:50 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Feb 3 00:50 run Once I ran the following: chmod 775 /opt/csw/var/lib pidgin seems to work. JL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Harp" To: "questions and discussions" Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [csw-users] Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install > Did some more digging, looks like dbus-uuidgen is run in the postinstall > for CSWdbus. CSWpidgin only depends on CSWlibdbus. > > Quick fix for your situation should be a 'pkg-get -i dbus' > > I'll get a new version of pidgin packaged up with a new dependency on > CSWdbus. > > Sorry for the troubles, Chad > > Chad Harp wrote: >> Hello, dbus-uuidgen is part or CSWdbus >> >> Need a few things to help track this down: >> >> >> Did you install the packages with pkg-get/pkgutil? >> >> Can you attach the output of the following commands: >> >> ls -l /opt/csw/var/lib/dbus >> pkginfo -l CSWdbus CSWdbusglib CSWlibdbus CSWpidgin >> >> >> Thanks, Chad >> >> JL Picard wrote: >>> I have a brand new Sun T5240 Sparc/Sol10 box with a FRESH installation >>> of OpenCSW package including pidgin and pidgin-otr packages. The >>> packages seem to install clean, but I am getting this error on startup: >>> >>> process 11234: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to >>> read machine uuid: Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": >>> Permission denied >>> See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. >>> D-Bus not compiled with backtrace support so unable to print a >>> backtrace >>> Abort (core dumped) >>> >>> My basic research leads me to believe I need to run dbus-uuidgen >>> (presumably as root) to atleast generate the UID file, but I dont even >>> see the binary installed. >>> >>> Does anyone have an idea where I've gone wrong? >>> >>> J >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From william at wbonnet.net Tue Feb 3 10:22:32 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:22:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] DBUS Install Script issue/problem (formerly: Pidgin Error on New Sol 10 Install) In-Reply-To: References: <49877F73.60407@opencsw.org> <4987818D.6030305@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49880CD8.8000304@wbonnet.net> Hi > After installing DBUS, I ran pidgin on got this error again: > process 11375: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to > read machine uuid: > Failed to open "/opt/csw/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": Permission denied > > DBus (and glib dbus) updates are available, i'll release them today to testing. cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Feb 4 18:02:59 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:02:59 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ruby in testing Message-ID: <1233766867-sup-9489@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've resolved the rdoc issue with the ruby packaging that saw different files generated for the various platforms. New packages for 1.8.7p72 are now available in testing. Let me know if you spot any problems with these. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Sat Feb 7 16:06:34 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:06:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium Message-ID: Dear users, the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism for user requests. The following solutions have been proposed: - Mailing list (that how it is now) - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) - Web forum (phpBB) - Web forum (other, please state which and why) - Chat - Something we forgot to mention? Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually needed. Best regards -- Dago (Secretary of the board) From harpchad at opencsw.org Sat Feb 7 16:09:04 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:09:04 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Web forum (phpBB) From mwatters at opencsw.org Sat Feb 7 16:42:45 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:42:45 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <498DABF5.6000107@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 web forum (phpBB) IRC create #opencsw on irc.freenode.net (Formerly OpenProjects.net) Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Dear users, > > the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki > infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism > for user requests. > > The following solutions have been proposed: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) > - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) > - Web forum (phpBB) > - Web forum (other, please state which and why) > - Chat > - Something we forgot to mention? > > Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually > needed. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago (Secretary of the board) > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmNq/UACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfPEQCdEAsJRxtNjckTXUjGP/Q/CBDC vZAAoKBm1xn3s0ir8m4qwOWLb9+lB9/y =JcQT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From lucian at lastdot.org Sat Feb 7 20:46:09 2009 From: lucian at lastdot.org (lucian at lastdot.org) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:46:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <498DE501.3010009@lastdot.org> On 02/07/2009 03:06 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Dear users, > > the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki > infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism > for user requests. > > The following solutions have been proposed: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) Mailing lists. They are the proven way to do this kind of things. All the big names do it this way (kernel.org, freebsd, and who knows, maybe even microsoft). > - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) > - Web forum (phpBB) > - Web forum (other, please state which and why) > - Chat > - Something we forgot to mention? > > Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually > needed. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago (Secretary of the board) > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From jeff at cjsa.com Sat Feb 7 22:17:54 2009 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 21:17:54 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium References: <498DE501.3010009@lastdot.org> Message-ID: On 02/07/2009 03:06 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Dear users, > > the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki > infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism > for user requests. I support the current mailing list. Regards, -- Jeff From ggunselm at emporia.edu Sun Feb 8 02:33:41 2009 From: ggunselm at emporia.edu (Glen Gunselman) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:33:41 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <498DE215.CC54.005D.3@emporia.edu> - Mailing list (that how it is now) Mailing list is the only option that has any meaning to me. Glen Gunselman Systems Software Specialist TCS Emporia State University >>> Dagobert Michelsen 02/07/09 9:06 AM >>> Dear users, the OpenCSW website will soon be replaced by a modern blog/wiki infrastructure. One thing under discussion is the support mechanism for user requests. The following solutions have been proposed: - Mailing list (that how it is now) - Enhanced mailing list (e. g. via Gmane.org) - Web forum (phpBB) - Web forum (other, please state which and why) - Chat - Something we forgot to mention? Please reply what you prefer, so we can offer what is actually needed. Best regards -- Dago (Secretary of the board) _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 12:39:44 2009 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:39:44 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 07/02/09, 15:06:34, Dagobert Michelsen wrote regarding [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) +1 > - Something we forgot to mention? NNTP newsgroup From pfelecan at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 18:45:55 2009 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:45:55 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> (James Lee's message of "Sun\, 08 Feb 2009 11\:39\:44 GMT") References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> Message-ID: James Lee writes: > On 07/02/09, 15:06:34, Dagobert Michelsen wrote regarding > [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium: > >> - Mailing list (that how it is now) > > +1 +1 >> - Something we forgot to mention? > > NNTP newsgroup +1 -- Peter From ihsan at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 19:40:47 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:40:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> Message-ID: <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Am 8.2.2009 12:39 Uhr, James Lee schrieb: >> - Mailing list (that how it is now) > > +1 > >> - Something we forgot to mention? > > NNTP newsgroup NNTP access to the OpenCSW mailing list is already available trhought Gmane. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com Sun Feb 8 22:26:14 2009 From: floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com (Floris Bruynooghe) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:26:14 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090208212614.GA5198@laurie.devork> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > The following solutions have been proposed: > - Mailing list (that how it is now) +1 > - Chat IRC could be nice, but not too fussed. Regards Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org From bonivart at opencsw.org Sun Feb 8 22:34:36 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:34:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium In-Reply-To: <20090208212614.GA5198@laurie.devork> References: <20090208212614.GA5198@laurie.devork> Message-ID: <625385e30902081334i7f20a8fepf4f062ae84a6d23@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> The following solutions have been proposed: >> - Mailing list (that how it is now) > > +1 > >> - Chat > > IRC could be nice, but not too fussed. We actually already have IRC, there's an #opencsw channel at freenode.net, but I don't think it's announced anywhere. -- /peter From jeff at cjsa.com Mon Feb 9 00:57:09 2009 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:57:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: [csw-users] Survey: Your preferred support medium References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <200902082357.n18Nv9Al008891@cjsa.cjsa.com> In local.csw.users you write: >Am 8.2.2009 12:39 Uhr, James Lee schrieb: >>> - Mailing list (that how it is now) >> >> +1 >> >>> - Something we forgot to mention? >> >> NNTP newsgroup >NNTP access to the OpenCSW mailing list is already available trhought Gmane. I'm already feeding the mailing lists into a local newsgroup on my machine with followups/replies mailed back to the list by the news system. (C news) Regards, -- Jeff From jlpicard15 at hotmail.com Tue Feb 10 18:43:35 2009 From: jlpicard15 at hotmail.com (JL Picard) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:43:35 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] CSW LSOF package no longer works in Sol 10/Sparc/T5240 Setup References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Message-ID: After installing the LSOF package on a new install of the latest Solaris 10 revision on a T5240 server, LSOF no longer seems to work and I see a lot of msgs like the following, when I run "/opt/csw/bin/lsof -i": no TCP/UDP/IP information available A quick test with the latest version of LSOF on www.sunfreeware.com for Sol 10 seems to work fine. Perhaps there is a requirement for a specific Sol10 package for LSOF now? From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Feb 16 03:15:14 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:15:14 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] rubygems 1.3.1 in testing Message-ID: <1234750330-sup-8857@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've packaged the most recent release of rubygems and placed it in testing. It seems to work on my systems with some light testing. It's a pretty big jump from the previous release though and I don't have any systems running that version to test the update against. To the best of my knowledge, any changes in the gemspec files should be handled cleanly, so this new version should see your old gems and work with them without problems...again though, I'm not able to test this myself. Feedback welcome. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Mon Feb 16 09:18:06 2009 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:18:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] WARNING: upgrade problem with last openssh package under Solaris 10 Message-ID: <4999213E.7000407@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Hi, The previous openssh packages were incorrectly pushed in the csw repository tree: the solaris 8 package was pushed in the solaris 10 tree instead of the solaris 10 one. As a side effect, with the current package, stopping openssh under Solaris 10 kills all ssh connections. The problem will be solved with the next package release, which will soon land in the repository, but the upgrade will not go smoothly as the previous ssh processes will be stopped during the operation, hence killing all ssh connections. So if you perform the upgrade from an ssh connection, this connection will be killed, the ssh package will be left in a uninstalled state and you will not be able to log again on your server using ssh. To avoid this problem: - either perform the upgrade from the console or using another remote shell - or follow this procedure: * launch manually the openssh daemon on a non-standard port: /opt/csw/sbin/sshd -p 2022 * connect to your server by ssh on this port: ssh -p 2022 yourserver * perform the upgrade from this connection The openssh daemon manually launched will not be killed allowing you to perform the upgrade safely. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by this bug. Yann From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Feb 16 17:37:33 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:37:33 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] WARNING: upgrade problem with last openssh package under Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <4999213E.7000407@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <4999213E.7000407@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <4999964D.7010409@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 the problem lies in the pre-remove although I don't have a copy for solaris 8 I can look at. The workaround I have used in the past for this problem is as follows: first, ssh into the system, sudo root cd /var/sadm/pkgs/CSWossh/install cp preremove ~/ # to keep a copy for cleanup edit the preremove script in install and before any other code put exit 0 this will cause the package to skip the pre-remove as successful. then you can pkgrm the new package without losing your ssh connections. before adding the "new" package, walk yourself through the original pre-remove and cleanup the same things it did. i.e. /var/run/sshd.pid et.al. then you can pkg-add your new version and as people disconnect and re-connect their ssh version will be upgraded. - -- Mike Yann Rouillard wrote: > Hi, > > The previous openssh packages were incorrectly pushed in the csw > repository tree: the solaris 8 package was pushed in the solaris 10 tree > instead of the solaris 10 one. > > As a side effect, with the current package, stopping openssh under > Solaris 10 kills all ssh connections. > > The problem will be solved with the next package release, which will > soon land in the repository, but the upgrade will not go smoothly as the > previous ssh processes will be stopped during the operation, hence > killing all ssh connections. > > So if you perform the upgrade from an ssh connection, this connection > will be killed, the ssh package will be left in a uninstalled state and > you will not be able to log again on your server using ssh. > > To avoid this problem: > > - either perform the upgrade from the console or using another remote > shell > > - or follow this procedure: > > * launch manually the openssh daemon on a non-standard port: > /opt/csw/sbin/sshd -p 2022 > > * connect to your server by ssh on this port: > ssh -p 2022 yourserver > > * perform the upgrade from this connection > > The openssh daemon manually launched will not be killed allowing you > to perform the upgrade safely. > > > I apologize for any inconvenience caused by this bug. > > Yann > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmZlk0ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxez1QCfZN+jkMuDPTG1420NMcqM64Dy wPwAoNLtbi9fGL8BjhQ6EDqyODbD5CdQ =5PNk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ihsan at opencsw.org Fri Feb 20 20:46:00 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:46:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Apache 2.2.11 in testing Message-ID: <499F0878.2040905@opencsw.org> Hello, Apache 2.2.11 is now available on http://www.opencsw.org/testing/ . ap2_prefork-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_suexec-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_worker-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz apache2_devel-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz apache2c-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz apache2rt-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_prefork-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_suexec-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz ap2_worker-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz apache2_devel-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz apache2c-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz apache2rt-2.2.11,REV=2009.02.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From hson at opencsw.org Sun Feb 22 02:39:50 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:39:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New versions of exiftool, libexif, libiptcdata, librsvg, ilmbase and openexr in /testing Message-ID: <49A0ACE6.3070508@opencsw.org> exiftool: - Update to 7.69 - Built with gar libexif: - Built with gar libiptcdata: - Built with gar librsvg: - Update to 2.22.3 (same as old testing-package, but without static libraries and with old .so-file for compatibility) - Built with gar ilmbase: - New package which openexr needs (upstream split into two packages openexr: - Update to 1.6.1 - Built with gar Downloadable from http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Feb 22 17:54:54 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:54:54 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] new ruby packages in testing Message-ID: <1235321631-sup-6561@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, There are new ruby packages in testing. These packages address an issue with a missing static library (libruby-static.a) that some extensions require to build. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hson at opencsw.org Mon Feb 23 02:14:45 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:14:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New imagemagick package in testing Message-ID: <49A1F885.5090501@opencsw.org> Changes: - Update to 6.4.9-6 - Built with DJVU, DPS and EXR support - Included old libraries for backward compatibility - Built using gar Download from http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html Since this is a large jump from the old version and due to the vast number of file format coders, I would like to get as many as possible to test the package before I release it public. From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Feb 26 17:00:59 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:00:59 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ruby packages in testing Message-ID: <1235663912-sup-4053@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, There are new ruby packages in testing. These are a response to the lack of the libruby-static.a file bug that was created last week. I've now added a rubydev package that contains the header files, mkmf module and the static library that modules (may) use. This is more in line with ruby distros from other package repos. Please test this if you're interested and send feedback to me if you've got any. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Fri Feb 27 17:34:48 2009 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (ghenry) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:34:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] is CSWdhcpd fully functionnal? Message-ID: <49A81628.6080701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i just upgrade from release 3 to 4, and i'm not sure that everything is ok. With release 3, a snoop shows: t2000-root% snoop port 67 Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) 192.168.1.84 -> t2000 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST t2000 -> 192.168.1.84 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER t2000 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER t2000 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST t2000 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM t2000 -> 192.168.1.242 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM but with release 4: fury-root% snoop port 67 Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER i ran dhcpd in debug mode, and i never see the client appearing in the logs. Is it possible to stay at release 3, but with SMF enabled? thanks in advance, gerard From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Feb 27 18:15:53 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:15:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] is CSWdhcpd fully functionnal? In-Reply-To: <49A81628.6080701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <49A81628.6080701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <625385e30902270915w370ff027h15078fcd2b6c559f@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, ghenry wrote: > hello all, > i just upgrade from release 3 to 4, and i'm not sure that everything is ok. > With release 3, a snoop shows: > t2000-root% snoop port 67 > Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) > 192.168.1.84 -> t2000 ? ? ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> 192.168.1.84 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPOFFER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPREQUEST > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK > 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM > ? ? ? ?t2000 -> 192.168.1.242 DHCP/BOOTP DHCPACK > 192.168.1.242 -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPINFORM > > but with release 4: > fury-root% snoop port 67 > Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode) > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > nagios.moi.fr -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > OLD-BROADCAST -> BROADCAST ? ?DHCP/BOOTP DHCPDISCOVER > > > i ran dhcpd in debug mode, and i never see the client appearing in the logs. I'm not really sure what you want to demonstrate above, is it a problem with your logs or with your clients not getting IP addresses? Did you have a working configuration with version 3 that now doesn't work with version 4? I upgraded from 3 to 4 with no configuration changes and it works. > Is it possible to stay at release 3, but with SMF enabled? You may be able to keep the manifest and service script, they are located in /var/opt/csw/svc. If you go back to v3 you can then import the manifest manually. -- /peter