From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun May 1 15:20:27 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 09:20:27 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] call for php5 testing Message-ID: <1304255952-sup-2924@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've placed a set of packages in experimental/php5[1] that I think are worthy of wider testing. This is a large overhaul of the build recipe and I've also modernized the package in other ways. As this is a large package and will affect a great many sites, I'd appreciate any testing feedback you can offer before it's pushed for release. Thanks -Ben [1] http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#php5 -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Sun May 1 18:52:53 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 17:52:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] call for php5 testing In-Reply-To: <1304255952-sup-2924@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1304255952-sup-2924@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: 2011/5/1 Ben Walton : > As this is a large package and will affect a great many sites, I'd > appreciate any testing feedback you can offer before it's pushed for > release. I ran an update of the php5 package to try out running php5 with lighttpd; here's the error I got: /opt/csw/share/doc/php5/license [ verifying class ] Modifying /opt/csw/php5/extensions/pdo_mysql Modifying /opt/csw/php5/extensions/pdo_odbc Modifying /opt/csw/php5/extensions/pdo_pgsql Modifying /opt/csw/php5/extensions/pdo_sqlite Modifying /opt/csw/php5/extensions/phar pkgadd: ERROR: class action script did not complete successfully [ verifying class ] [ verifying class ] Copying sample config to /etc/opt/csw/php5/pear.conf Copying sample config to /etc/opt/csw/php5/php.ini [ verifying class ] ## Executing postinstall script. cp: cannot access _PHPETCDIR_/pear.conf.CSW /var/sadm/pkg/CSWphp5/install/postinstall: _PHPBINDIR_/pear: not found cp: cannot access _PHPINIFILE_.CSW /var/sadm/pkg/CSWphp5/install/postinstall: _PHPBINDIR_/php: not found PHP5 configuration: _PHPINIFILE_ Installation of partially failed. ## Interrupted: package not installed in any non-global zones 1 package was not processed! pkgadd failed with exit code: 2 Exit from pkgutil and fix this issue first (recommended)? ([y],n) Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun May 1 22:13:06 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 16:13:06 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] call for php5 testing In-Reply-To: References: <1304255952-sup-2924@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1304280715-sup-6312@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej Blizi?ski's message of Sun May 01 12:52:53 -0400 2011: Hi Maciej, > I ran an update of the php5 package to try out running php5 with > lighttpd; here's the error I got: Thanks for this. I somehow missed it in my backscroll. The postinstall stuff is easy to fix. I need to see why the phar module registration fails though. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr Fri May 6 21:11:12 2011 From: axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr (axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:11:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd Message-ID: Hi list, I can't install unrealircd on SunOS 10: # pkgutil -i CSWunrealircd Solving needed dependencies ... Package CSWunrealircd not in catalog. Exiting. Though it does exist: http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWunrealircd/ # pkgutil -v 2.3 and my catalog is recently updated. I use: descriptions.ibiblio.org_pub_packages_solaris_opencsw_current_sparc_5.10 SunOS 5.10 Thanks Axelle From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri May 6 21:42:34 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 15:42:34 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1304710932-sup-469@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from axelle_apvrille's message of Fri May 06 15:11:12 -0400 2011: Hi Axelle, It's being looked into... Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Tue May 10 20:06:56 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:06:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/5/6 : > I can't install unrealircd on SunOS 10: > # pkgutil -i CSWunrealircd > Solving needed dependencies ... > Package CSWunrealircd not in catalog. Exiting. > > Though it does exist: http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWunrealircd/ > > # pkgutil -v > 2.3 > > and my catalog is recently updated. > > I use: > descriptions.ibiblio.org_pub_packages_solaris_opencsw_current_sparc_5.10 Hi Axelle, There was a short discussion[1] on the maintainers mailing list. It is possible that the absence of unrealircd in the catalog is intentional, while the page on the web site is an inconsistency. I've looked into building a new version of unrealircd. I've built libtre, and attempted a compilation, but there is a blocking syntax error, which breaks the compilation on both compilers (Solaris Studio and GCC): In file included from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/iso/wchar_iso.h:44, from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/wchar.h:20, from /opt/csw/include/tre/tre.h:147, from /opt/csw/include/tre/regex.h:16, from ../include/struct.h:68, from ssl.c:23: /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/ctype.h:58: error: expected ')' before '>=' token It will require investigative work, so we have no way of quickly upgrading the package. If you're interested in the old package, you can download it by hand from oldpkgs[2]. Maciej [1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-May/014553.html [2] http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/current/sparc/5.9/ From axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr Fri May 13 20:23:41 2011 From: axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr (Axelle Apvrille) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:23:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4DCD772D.2050503@yahoo.fr> > Hi Axelle, > > There was a short discussion[1] on the maintainers mailing list. It > is possible that the absence of unrealircd in the catalog is > intentional, while the page on the web site is an inconsistency. > > I've looked into building a new version of unrealircd. I've built > libtre, and attempted a compilation, but there is a blocking syntax > error, which breaks the compilation on both compilers (Solaris > Studio and GCC): Hi Maciej, (and Ben) > In file included from > /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/iso/wchar_iso.h:44, > from > /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/wchar.h:20, > from /opt/csw/include/tre/tre.h:147, > from /opt/csw/include/tre/regex.h:16, > from ../include/struct.h:68, > from ssl.c:23: > /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/ctype.h:58: > error: expected ')' before '>=' token > > It will require investigative work, so we have no way of quickly > upgrading the package. If you're interested in the old package, you > can download it by hand from oldpkgs[2]. Thanks for your answer. So far, I have been looking for other IRC servers to install on Solaris, I am currently quite unsuccessful (always a quirk or another that causes it not to compile easily). If anybody has had any successful experience building an IRC server on Solaris, I'd love to hear about it. It is certainly feasible, I am sure. Just needs some more work ;) Axelle From leslie.wood at oracle.com Fri May 13 20:24:57 2011 From: leslie.wood at oracle.com (leslie.wood at oracle.com) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Auto Reply: Re: Can't find CSWunrealircd Message-ID: <67aa49e5-3379-44b5-88d7-270ee180ac12@default> This is an auto-replied message. I am on vacation Friday 13th May and will be back on Monday 16th. Please use the "swie_support_ww at oracle.com" alias if you need help. From leslie.wood at oracle.com Fri May 13 20:25:25 2011 From: leslie.wood at oracle.com (leslie.wood at oracle.com) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Auto Reply: Auto Reply: Re: Can't find CSWunrealircd Message-ID: <82023c74-33ad-4268-a615-4f41b21346e8@default> This is an auto-replied message. I am on vacation Friday 13th May and will be back on Monday 16th. Please use the "swie_support_ww at oracle.com" alias if you need help. From internetjanitor at gmail.com Fri May 13 20:41:00 2011 From: internetjanitor at gmail.com (Eric Miller) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:41:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd In-Reply-To: <4DCD772D.2050503@yahoo.fr> References: <4DCD772D.2050503@yahoo.fr> Message-ID: On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Axelle Apvrille wrote: > If anybody has had any successful experience building an IRC server on >> Solaris, I'd love to hear about it. It is certainly feasible, I am sure. > > Hi Axelle, You might try Hyperion ( http://www.stack.nl/~jilles/irc/hyperion-1.0.2.tar.gz) which is what Freenode uses. I had some success but many of the configuration options are hardcoded. I applied the following "sed patch" and installed in prefix=/opt/hyperion and kept all configuration in /srv/hyperion. sed -e 's/+ns/+n/' -e 's/ | MODE_SECRET;/;/' src/channel.c > src/channel.c.$$ mv src/channel.c.$$ src/channel.c sed \ -e 's,#define DPATH PREFIX "/",#define DPATH "/srv/hyperion",' \ -e 's,#define SPATH "sbin/hyperion-ircd",#define SPATH "/opt/hyperion/sbin/hyperion-ircd",' \ -e 's,#define CPATH "etc/dancer-ircd/ircd.conf",#define CPATH "etc/ircd.conf",' \ -e 's,#define MPATH "etc/dancer-ircd/motd",#define MPATH "etc/motd",' \ -e 's,#define HPATH "etc/dancer-ircd/ohelp",#define HPATH "etc/ohelp",' \ -e 's,#define OPATH "etc/dancer-ircd/omotd",#define OPATH "etc/omotd",' \ -e 's,#define LPATH "var/log/dancer-ircd/ircd.log",#define LPATH "var/log/ircd.log",' \ -e 's,#define HLBASE "var/log/dancer-ircd/hash",#define HLBASE "var/log/hash",' \ -e 's,#define USERLOG "var/log/dancer-ircd/user.log",#define USERLOG "var/log/user.log",' \ -e 's,#define OPERLOG "var/log/dancer-ircd/oper.log",#define OPERLOG "var/log/oper.log",' \ -e 's,#define PPATH "var/run/dancer-ircd/dancer-ircd.pid",#define PPATH "var/run/ircd.pid",' \ -e 's,#define KPATH "var/lib/dancer-ircd/kline.conf",#define KPATH "var/lib/kline.conf",' \ -e 's,#define DLPATH "var/lib/dancer-ircd/dline.conf",#define DLPATH "var/lib/dline.conf",' \ -e 's,#define MXPATH "var/lib/dancer-ircd/ircd.max",#define MXPATH "var/lib/ircd.max",' \ -e 's,#define DUMPPATH "var/lib/dancer-ircd/dump",#define DUMPPATH "var/lib/dump",' \ src/paths.c > src/paths.c.$$ mv src/paths.c.$$ src/paths.c sed \ -e 's/#define MIN_USERS_FOR_LIST 4/#define MIN_USERS_FOR_LIST 0/' \ -e 's/#define NO_CHANOPS_ON_SPLIT/#undef NO_CHANOPS_ON_SPLIT/' \ -e 's/#define CONNECTTIMEOUT 30/#define CONNECTTIMEOUT 0/' \ -e 's/#define NETWORK_NAME "irc.freenode.net"/#define NETWORK_NAME " irc.my.org"/' \ -e 's/#define NETWORK_REALNAME "freenode IRC"/#define NETWORK_REALNAME "My IRC Network"/' \ -e 's,#define NETWORK_DESC "http://freenode.net/",#define NETWORK_DESC "http://my.org/",' \ include/config.h > include/config.h.$$ mv include/config.h.$$ include/config.h sed \ -e "s/request->retries = 3;/request->retries = 0;/" \ -e "s/request->resend = 1;/request->resend = 0;/" \ src/res.c > src/res.c.$$ mv src/res.c.$$ src/res.c -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From leslie.wood at oracle.com Fri May 13 20:41:39 2011 From: leslie.wood at oracle.com (leslie.wood at oracle.com) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [csw-users] Auto Reply: Re: Can't find CSWunrealircd Message-ID: This is an auto-replied message. I am on vacation Friday 13th May and will be back on Monday 16th. Please use the "swie_support_ww at oracle.com" alias if you need help. From axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr Fri May 13 21:53:49 2011 From: axelle_apvrille at yahoo.fr (Axelle Apvrille) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:53:49 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd In-Reply-To: References: <4DCD772D.2050503@yahoo.fr> Message-ID: <4DCD8C4D.7080508@yahoo.fr> Eric Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Axelle Apvrille > > wrote: > > If anybody has had any successful experience building an IRC > server on Solaris, I'd love to hear about it. It is certainly > feasible, I am sure. > > > Hi Axelle, Hi Eric, > > You might try Hyperion > (http://www.stack.nl/~jilles/irc/hyperion-1.0.2.tar.gz) which is what > Freenode uses. I had some success but many of the configuration options > are hardcoded. I applied the following "sed patch" and installed in > prefix=/opt/hyperion and kept all configuration in /srv/hyperion. Ok. It compiled without any problem (did not need your patch). I am just having problems understanding how to configure it... (won't run as such). I use the default configuration file (example.conf). Regards Axelle From maciej at opencsw.org Tue May 17 00:48:38 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:48:38 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Can't find CSWunrealircd In-Reply-To: <4DCD8C4D.7080508@yahoo.fr> References: <4DCD772D.2050503@yahoo.fr> <4DCD8C4D.7080508@yahoo.fr> Message-ID: Hi Axelle, 2011/5/13 Axelle Apvrille : > Ok. It compiled without any problem (did not need your patch). > I am just having problems understanding how to configure it... > (won't run as such). > I use the default configuration file (example.conf). I think that part of the configuration issues might be due to the lack of the patch. The paths.c file contains paths where hyperion-ircd looks for files, and if unpatched, it looks at the wrong places. In the OpenCSW case, it looks like a problem to set up the paths correctly. Looking at paths.c, Hyperion assumes that all paths are of the form ${prefix}/directory. #define DPATH PREFIX "/" #define SPATH "sbin/hyperion-ircd" #define CPATH "etc/dancer-ircd/ircd.conf" In our case, we have prefix=/opt/csw, but sysconfdir=/etc/opt/csw, so it's /etc${prefix}, not ${prefix}/etc. I tried to hack it by setting the paths by using ".." segments: "../../etc/opt/csw/foo". I've built an experimental CSWhyperion package, it's available from here: http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#maciej The build description is available here: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/hyperion/trunk/ To install the experimental hyperion packages: pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/maciej -i hyperion Maciej From dave.morgan at s4c.co.uk Tue May 17 12:07:54 2011 From: dave.morgan at s4c.co.uk (David Morgan) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:07:54 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade Message-ID: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> Is it possible to use Solaris Live Upgrade to update OpenCSW packages? Cheers, Dave. From dam at opencsw.org Tue May 17 12:32:03 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:32:03 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> Message-ID: <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> Hi David, Am 17.05.2011 um 12:07 schrieb David Morgan: > Is it possible to use Solaris Live Upgrade to update OpenCSW packages? It should be possible to do a lumount to some temporary mountpoint and then use something like (this does **NOT** work right now for the reason below): pkgutil -U -y -R /lumount -u Peter: I note there is root_path allowed in pkgutil.conf, it would IMHO be good to provide the above syntax for consistency with existing pkg-commands and easy-of-use. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Tue May 17 13:25:21 2011 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:25:21 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 17.05.2011 um 12:07 schrieb David Morgan: >> Is it possible to use Solaris Live Upgrade to update OpenCSW packages? > > It should be possible to do a lumount to some temporary mountpoint and > then use something like (this does **NOT** work right now for the reason > below): > ?pkgutil -U -y -R /lumount -u > > Peter: I note there is root_path allowed in pkgutil.conf, it would IMHO > be good to provide the above syntax for consistency with existing > pkg-commands and easy-of-use. I don't know how many options users can handle (remember :-), that's why I try to put unusual ones in pkgutil.conf instead. You can always temporarily set anything from pkgutil.conf with the --param option: # pkgutil -Uyu --param=root_path:/lumount Wouldn't that be good enough for now? On the other hand, -R is still available so I may put that in the next release... :-) /peter From dam at opencsw.org Tue May 17 13:28:38 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:28:38 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Peter, Am 17.05.2011 um 13:25 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 17.05.2011 um 12:07 schrieb David Morgan: >>> Is it possible to use Solaris Live Upgrade to update OpenCSW packages? >> >> It should be possible to do a lumount to some temporary mountpoint and >> then use something like (this does **NOT** work right now for the reason >> below): >> pkgutil -U -y -R /lumount -u >> >> Peter: I note there is root_path allowed in pkgutil.conf, it would IMHO >> be good to provide the above syntax for consistency with existing >> pkg-commands and easy-of-use. > > I don't know how many options users can handle (remember :-), that's > why I try to put unusual ones in pkgutil.conf instead. > > You can always temporarily set anything from pkgutil.conf with the > --param option: > > # pkgutil -Uyu --param=root_path:/lumount The packages _should_ be compliant with root relocation. David: Feel free to give it a try, it should work. If you encounter anything strange please post, visit us at #opencsw ot file a bug whatever you see fit :-) > Wouldn't that be good enough for now? On the other hand, -R is still > available so I may put that in the next release... :-) Sounds good. Best regards -- Dago From james at opencsw.org Tue May 17 13:31:10 2011 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:31:10 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> Message-ID: <20110517.11311000.2784505636@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 17/05/11, 11:07:54, David Morgan wrote regarding [csw-users] Live Upgrade: > Is it possible to use Solaris Live Upgrade to update OpenCSW packages? When I looked at this some time ago I decided it wouldn't work because not all packages respect being install outside /opt/csw. Install scripts don't (all) check the installation for fake or real root. It's not a requirement for the CSW packages. I think it could be but I've largely avoided the need by doing zone dances. One can update a spare zone while a another does the work. ZFS snapshot the zone root and rollback if needed. James. From dave.morgan at s4c.co.uk Tue May 17 16:48:32 2011 From: dave.morgan at s4c.co.uk (David Morgan) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:48:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107893@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> Many thanks for your replies. I'll use pkgutil as Peter and Dagobert suggested and report back. It would be great to be able to update the packages offline. Cheers, David. > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces+dave.morgan=s4c.co.uk at lists.opencsw.org > [mailto:users-bounces+dave.morgan=s4c.co.uk at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf > Of Dagobert Michelsen > Sent: 17 May 2011 12:29 > To: Peter Bonivart; Questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Live Upgrade > > Hi Peter, > > Am 17.05.2011 um 13:25 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: > >> Am 17.05.2011 um 12:07 schrieb David Morgan: > >>> Is it possible to use Solaris Live Upgrade to update OpenCSW packages? > >> > >> It should be possible to do a lumount to some temporary mountpoint > >> and then use something like (this does **NOT** work right now for the > >> reason > >> below): > >> pkgutil -U -y -R /lumount -u > >> > >> Peter: I note there is root_path allowed in pkgutil.conf, it would > >> IMHO be good to provide the above syntax for consistency with > >> existing pkg-commands and easy-of-use. > > > > I don't know how many options users can handle (remember :-), that's > > why I try to put unusual ones in pkgutil.conf instead. > > > > You can always temporarily set anything from pkgutil.conf with the > > --param option: > > > > # pkgutil -Uyu --param=root_path:/lumount > > The packages _should_ be compliant with root relocation. > > David: Feel free to give it a try, it should work. If you encounter anything > strange please post, visit us at #opencsw ot file a bug whatever you see fit :-) > > > Wouldn't that be good enough for now? On the other hand, -R is still > > available so I may put that in the next release... :-) > > Sounds good. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dam at opencsw.org Tue May 17 18:08:49 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 18:08:49 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW question about package libltdl7 In-Reply-To: <201105171605.p4HG5XTl003286@www.opencsw.org> References: <201105171605.p4HG5XTl003286@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Fabien, I take the liberty of cc'ing users at . Am 17.05.2011 um 18:05 schrieb jfa_curie at yahoo.com: > I\'m trying to obtain file libltdl.so.7 because my executable depends on it. See below. This is in CSWlibltdl7: http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWlibltdl7/ We are currently in the process of splitting up libraries, the library you need has been historically in CSWlibtool and then later in CSWlibtoolrt: > ldd convert > libMagickCore.so.4 => /lvtc/outils/ImageMagick-6.6.7/lib/libMagickCore.so.4 > libMagickWand.so.4 => /lvtc/outils/ImageMagick-6.6.7/lib/libMagickWand.so.4 > libtiff.so.3 => /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 > libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 > libpng14.so.14 => /lvtc/outils/ImageMagick-6.6.7/lib/libpng14.so.14 > libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/sfw/lib/libfreetype.so.6 > libexpat.so.1 => /usr/sfw/lib/libexpat.so.1 > libXext.so.0 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.0 > libXt.so.4 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.4 > libbz2.so.1 => /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 > libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 > libz.so => /usr/lib/libz.so > libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 > libltdl.so.7 => (file not found) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 > libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 > libX11.so.4 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.4 > libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 > libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 > libgomp.so.1 => (file not found) > librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 > libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 > libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 > libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/sfw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > libpng14.so.14 (PNG14_0) => (version not found) > libgomp.so.1 => (file not found) > libltdl.so.7 => (file not found) > libltdl.so.7 => (file not found) > libgomp.so.1 => (file not found) > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 > libmd.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmd.so.1 > libscf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libscf.so.1 > libaio.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaio.so.1 > libdoor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdoor.so.1 > libuutil.so.1 => /usr/lib/libuutil.so.1 > libgen.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgen.so.1 > /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200/lib/libmd_psr.so.1 > > This file can not be found. > > Would it be possible to get this library for a SUN Solaris 10 running on Sparc. It looks like there are some more libraries missing. Is there a specific reason why you are using a homemade ImageMagick instead of the OpenCSW one? http://www.opencsw.org/packages/imagemagick/ Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed May 18 17:57:05 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:57:05 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW contact maintainer In-Reply-To: <201105180847.p4I8laTl028358@www.opencsw.org> References: <201105180847.p4I8laTl028358@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <5AD83525-4C32-4FD9-9F28-91080C20544A@opencsw.org> Hi Pierre, (adding users@ for reference) first, I am not a hardcore fftw user. I just build the package as a dependency, so if I am missing details please update me on these :-) Am 18.05.2011 um 10:47 schrieb navaro at unistra.fr: > I\'m a FFTW user and i didn\'t find the double precision functions in the library. Functions beginning by dfftw are not present in the library. From what I read from the docs the dfftw functions are not double precision, but Fortran (from fftw3.texi): > This chapter describes the Fortran-callable interface to FFTW, which > differs from the C interface only in the prefix (@samp{dfftw_} instead > of @samp{fftw_}), and a few other minor details. At least on Solaris 9 I cannot compile with long double support due to the lack of the required trigonometric functions: > checking for cosl... (cached) no > configure: error: long-double precision requires long-double trigonometric routines I have now build a new set of packages with specific versions for Solaris 9 and 10: - the Solaris 9 package has now support for Fortran ("dfftw_"-prefix) - the Solaris 10 packages has now also support for Fortran and is also compiled with long double support (separate libraries libfftw3l*) Additionally, I split the package into separate files for the two libs, a separate devel and a utility package: fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3l3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3l3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3l_threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3l_threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz The packages are in experimental right now: http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#fftw You can install them with pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/fftw -i where catalogname is the first part of the filename before the "-", e.g. "libfftw_dev". Please test them and let me know if they work so I can release them to current/. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu May 19 04:34:00 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:34:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] exim security update in experimental Message-ID: <1305772312-sup-6733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, To mitigate against CVE-2011-1407, I've updated exim to 4.76 and placed it in experimental. I've tested it lightly and it seems ok. You may want to try it out if you're running it on internet-facing boxes. http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#exim Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From dam at opencsw.org Thu May 19 10:41:54 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:41:54 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW contact maintainer In-Reply-To: <4DD4D73B.3050901@unistra.fr> References: <201105180847.p4I8laTl028358@www.opencsw.org> <5AD83525-4C32-4FD9-9F28-91080C20544A@opencsw.org> <4DD4D73B.3050901@unistra.fr> Message-ID: Hi Pierre, Am 19.05.2011 um 10:39 schrieb Pierre Navaro: > Thanks, it works perfectly on my system and you're right i link fttw with a fortran program. > > I used Solaris 10 9-10 > uname -a > SunOS m-navaro-solaris 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc Thanks for your feedback, I'll release the updated version then to current/. Best regards -- Dago > On 18/05/11 17:57, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi Pierre, >> >> (adding users@ for reference) >> >> first, I am not a hardcore fftw user. I just build the package as a dependency, so >> if I am missing details please update me on these :-) >> >> Am 18.05.2011 um 10:47 schrieb navaro at unistra.fr: >>> I\'m a FFTW user and i didn\'t find the double precision functions in the library. Functions beginning by dfftw are not present in the library. >> From what I read from the docs the dfftw functions are not double precision, but Fortran >> (from fftw3.texi): >> >>> This chapter describes the Fortran-callable interface to FFTW, which >>> differs from the C interface only in the prefix (@samp{dfftw_} instead >>> of @samp{fftw_}), and a few other minor details. >> At least on Solaris 9 I cannot compile with long double support due to >> the lack of the required trigonometric functions: >> >>> checking for cosl... (cached) no >>> configure: error: long-double precision requires long-double trigonometric routines >> >> I have now build a new set of packages with specific versions for >> Solaris 9 and 10: >> - the Solaris 9 package has now support for Fortran ("dfftw_"-prefix) >> - the Solaris 10 packages has now also support for Fortran and is >> also compiled with long double support (separate libraries libfftw3l*) >> >> Additionally, I split the package into separate files for the two libs, >> a separate devel and a utility package: >> >> fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> fftw-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3_3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3l3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3l3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3l_threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3l_threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw3threads3-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >> libfftw_dev-3.2.2,REV=2011.05.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> >> >> The packages are in experimental right now: >> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#fftw >> >> You can install them with >> pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/fftw -i >> where catalogname is the first part of the filename before the "-", e.g. "libfftw_dev". >> >> Please test them and let me know if they work so I can release them >> to current/. >> >> >> Best regards >> >> -- Dago >> >> > > > -- > Pierre NAVARO > IRMA - UMR 7501 CNRS/Universite de Strasbourg - Bureau i101 > 7 rue Rene Descartes F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, FRANCE. > tel : (33) [0]3 68 85 01 73, fax : (33) [0]3 68 85 01 05 > http://www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/~navaro > From Nitin.Kapoor at Sensis.com Fri May 20 18:24:43 2011 From: Nitin.Kapoor at Sensis.com (Kapoor, Nitin) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:24:43 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] GCC Bug 40024 Message-ID: Hi All, I am using GCC version 4.3.3 downloaded from OpenCSW. I am seeing the exact segmentation fault described in the bug post below: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024 Is the above patch applied to 4.3.3 ? -bash-3.00$ g++ --v Using built-in specs. Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.3/configure --prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --exec-prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-nls --with-included-gettext --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw --with-x --with-mpfr=/opt/csw --with-gmp=/opt/csw --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-libada --enable-libssp --enable-objc-gc --enable-threads=posix --enable-stage1-languages=c --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,java,objc Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.3 (GCC) My gdb debug: [New Thread 2 (LWP 2)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 2 (LWP 2)] 0xfeade4d4 in emutls_destroy (ptr=0x1d2490) at ../../../gcc-4.3.3/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c:76 76 ../../../gcc-4.3.3/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c: No such file or directory. in ../../../gcc-4.3.3/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c (gdb) backtrace #0 0xfeade4d4 in emutls_destroy (ptr=0x1d2490) at ../../../gcc-4.3.3/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c:76 #1 0xfdb49134 in tsd_exit () from /lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xfdb45ce8 in _thrp_exit () from /lib/libc.so.1 #3 0xfdb4c2ec in _t_cancel () from /lib/libc.so.1 #4 0xfdb46090 in _thr_exit_common () from /lib/libc.so.1 #5 0xfdb49500 in _lwp_start () from /lib/libc.so.1 #6 0xfdb49500 in _lwp_start () from /lib/libc.so.1 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) Thanks, NitinK. - This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and advise the sender immediately. - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bxstover at yahoo.co.uk Sun May 22 14:00:09 2011 From: bxstover at yahoo.co.uk (Ben Stover) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 14:00:09 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Opencsw.org not compatible with OpenSolaris IPS publisher Package Manager interface? Message-ID: <145271.77651.bm@smtp147.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Hi, as I found out I cannot connect to opencsw.org software archive through openSolaris Package Manager. I mean here (see snapshot): http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/709/capture20110518203937.png When I want to add opencsw.org to the list of publishers I get errors like "No packages found" Is there really no such IPS compatible address from opencsw.org? Why not? An important repository like opencsw.org should have an interface to standard update package manager! Could someone install such a repository entry. Thank you Ben From maciej at opencsw.org Sun May 22 14:23:00 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 13:23:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Opencsw.org not compatible with OpenSolaris IPS publisher Package Manager interface? In-Reply-To: <145271.77651.bm@smtp147.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <145271.77651.bm@smtp147.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: 2011/5/22 Ben Stover : > as I found out I cannot connect to opencsw.org software archive through openSolaris Package Manager. > I mean here (see snapshot): > > http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/709/capture20110518203937.png > > When I want to add opencsw.org to the list of publishers I get errors like "No packages found" > > Is there really no such IPS compatible address from opencsw.org? > > Why not? An important repository like opencsw.org should have an interface to standard update package manager! > > Could someone install such a repository entry. Hi Ben, Thanks for writing. Unfortunately, there is no IPS repository currently provided by OpenCSW. I definitely agree that OpenCSW packages accessible in the IPS format would be of great value. There have been discussions about creating an IPS repository for OpenCSW, but it would be a major effort. For example, the old srv4 format features Class Action Sripts, which are extensively used at OpenCSW. As far as I know, IPS doesn't have this (or an equivalent) feature. Porting the OpenCSW repository to IPS would require solving this problem. It's not unsolvable, but it's not easy. We are open to the idea and will accept volunteer efforts in this direction. You can still install OpenCSW packages on OpenSolaris, using the legacy packaging tools. You can get started with the following command: pkgadd -d http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/pkgutil-`uname -p`.pkg all pkgutil -U pkgutil -y -i Regards, Maciej From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon May 23 14:51:55 2011 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:51:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107893@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107893@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> Message-ID: On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:48 PM, David Morgan wrote: > Many thanks for your replies. > I'll use pkgutil as Peter and Dagobert suggested and report back. > > It would be great to be able to update the packages offline. Have you had a chance to try this yet? I'm very interested to hear if this works from a pkgutil perspective. /peter From dave.morgan at s4c.co.uk Wed May 25 11:11:54 2011 From: dave.morgan at s4c.co.uk (David Morgan) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:11:54 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Live Upgrade In-Reply-To: References: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107865@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> <1C3C56F0-6B9F-42FD-9BF6-12F2092EF43C@opencsw.org> <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107893@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> Message-ID: <6A375D84BFD9514CA9525AF93CFC7CBF9D4F107A8C@EX2007CLUSTER.S4C.AD> I haven't had a chance to test pkgutil and live upgrade yet. But I'll report back when I have. Dave. > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces+dave.morgan=s4c.co.uk at lists.opencsw.org > [mailto:users-bounces+dave.morgan=s4c.co.uk at lists.opencsw.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Bonivart > Sent: 23 May 2011 13:52 > To: Questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Live Upgrade > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:48 PM, David Morgan > wrote: > > Many thanks for your replies. > > I'll use pkgutil as Peter and Dagobert suggested and report back. > > > > It would be great to be able to update the packages offline. > > Have you had a chance to try this yet? I'm very interested to hear if this > works from a pkgutil perspective. > > /peter > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From Nitin.Kapoor at Sensis.com Wed May 25 17:11:45 2011 From: Nitin.Kapoor at Sensis.com (Kapoor, Nitin) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:11:45 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] GCC 4.3.3 Question Message-ID: Hi All , If this is not the right location for this post please let me know where to post this message. I am running Solaris 10 and using GCC version 4.3.3 downloaded from OpenCSW. What I am trying to find out is whether the following bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024 is fixed in the GCC 4.3.3 that I downloaded using pkg-get from OpenCSW ? Because my GCC compiled applications are behaving the same way as described by the bug description. -bash-3.00$ g++ --v Using built-in specs. Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.3/configure --prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --exec-prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-nls --with-included-gettext --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw --with-x --with-mpfr=/opt/csw --with-gmp=/opt/csw --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-libada --enable-libssp --enable-objc-gc --enable-threads=posix --enable-stage1-languages=c --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,java,objc Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.3 (GCC) Thanks, NitinK. - This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and advise the sender immediately. - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Sat May 28 13:29:25 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 12:29:25 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] GCC 4.3.3 Question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Nitin, 2011/5/25 Kapoor, Nitin : > If this is not the right location for this post please let me know where to > post this message. This is the right place. > I am running Solaris 10 and using GCC version 4.3.3 downloaded from OpenCSW. > > What I am trying to find out is? whether the following bug: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024 > > is fixed in the GCC 4.3.3 that I downloaded using pkg-get from? OpenCSW ? > Because my GCC compiled applications are behaving the same way as described > by the bug description. The OpenCSW GCC needs to be upgraded. Unfortunately, the maintainer of the GCC package has retired from the project, and the upgrade is not an easy rebuild. There are dependencies of GCC that also need rebuilding, so GCC upgrade is a significant effort. There was also bit of a discussion on the maintainers mailing list: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-May/014632.html We would definitely accept a volunteer effort to upgrade this package. The build description with partial work towards the 4.5.x line is in the source code repository: http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/gcc4/trunk/ Maciej