From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Tue Nov 1 02:54:22 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?koi8-r?B?4s/OxMHSxc7LzyDhzsTSxcog98nUwczYxdfJ3g==?=) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:54:22 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi Here is a patch on top of https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake/trunk/ (r16053) I've updated remake to the current version and added build dependencies. Compilation with sun studio fails with error so I switched to GCC3. I don't think it is a big problem, because remake is mostly useful for debugging. The patch works for me in Solaris 10 with mixed unstable + testing environment. Hope you find it useful. Remake really help debugging large Makefiles like GAR. Best regards, Andrey -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: remake-3.82+dbg0.8.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1626 bytes Desc: remake-3.82+dbg0.8.patch URL: From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Wed Nov 2 16:05:51 2011 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:05:51 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found Message-ID: Hello, Using openCSW on solaris 10. I have run into an issue as below. /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -U => Fetching new catalog and descriptions (http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current/sparc/5.10) if available ... --2011-11-02 09:59:44-- http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current/sparc/5.10/catalog Resolving ftp.math.purdue.edu... 128.210.3.186 Connecting to ftp.math.purdue.edu|128.210.3.186|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 629075 (614K) [text/plain] Saving to: `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.ftp.math.purdue.edu_mirrors_opencsw.org_current_sparc_5.10.tmp' 100%[==============================================================================>] 629,075 937K/s in 0.7s 2011-11-02 09:59:44 (937 KB/s) - `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.ftp.math.purdue.edu_mirrors_opencsw.org_current_sparc_5.10.tmp' saved [629075/629075] --2011-11-02 09:59:44-- http://ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/opencsw.org/current/sparc/5.10/descriptions Resolving ftp.math.purdue.edu... 128.210.3.186 Connecting to ftp.math.purdue.edu|128.210.3.186|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 180257 (176K) [text/plain] Saving to: `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/descriptions.ftp.math.purdue.edu_mirrors_opencsw.org_current_sparc_5.10.tmp' 100%[==============================================================================>] 180,257 788K/s in 0.2s 2011-11-02 09:59:45 (788 KB/s) - `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/descriptions.ftp.math.purdue.edu_mirrors_opencsw.org_current_sparc_5.10.tmp' saved [180257/180257] Checking integrity of /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.ftp.math.purdue.edu_mirrors_opencsw.org_current_sparc_5.10 with gpg. gpg: Signature made Wed Nov 02 03:34:30 2011 CDT using DSA key ID 9306CC77 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Bad signature detected in catalog! How should I take care of this? Thanks, ~Aero From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Nov 2 16:09:07 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:09:07 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from upen's message of Wed Nov 02 11:05:51 -0400 2011: Hi Aero, > Checking integrity of > /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.ftp.math.purdue.edu_mirrors_opencsw.org_current_sparc_5.10 > with gpg. gpg: Signature made Wed Nov 02 03:34:30 2011 CDT using > DSA key ID 9306CC77 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > Bad signature detected in catalog! You can either install CSWcswpki by downloading: http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10/cswpki-1.0%2cREV%3d2011.09.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz Or using the key information near the bottom of this page: http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/mirrors/ Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Wed Nov 2 16:15:55 2011 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:15:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: > You can either install CSWcswpki by downloading: > http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10/cswpki-1.0%2cREV%3d2011.09.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > Or using the key information near the bottom of this page: > http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/mirrors/ Thanks Ben! for a such a quck and help reply. I used http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/mirrors/ and reimported the gpg key and trusted it. Problem solved! Have a great day! ~Aero From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Nov 2 16:18:01 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:18:01 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: References: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1320246991-sup-4366@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from upen's message of Wed Nov 02 11:15:55 -0400 2011: > Thanks Ben! for a such a quck and help reply. I used > http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/mirrors/ and reimported the gpg key and > trusted it. Problem solved! No problem. Glad it worked. I'd recommend installing CSWcswpki as we'll use that channel to easily deliver updated keys to systems going forward. The out of band mechanism will remain in place for several reasons too, but the package update route should make things easier for some sites. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Wed Nov 2 16:22:57 2011 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:22:57 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: <1320246991-sup-4366@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1320246991-sup-4366@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from upen's message of Wed Nov 02 11:15:55 -0400 2011: > >> Thanks Ben! for a such a quck and help reply. I used >> http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/mirrors/ and reimported the gpg key and >> trusted it. Problem solved! > > No problem. ?Glad it worked. ?I'd recommend installing CSWcswpki as > we'll use that channel to easily deliver updated keys to systems going > forward. ?The out of band mechanism will remain in place for several > reasons too, but the package update route should make things easier > for some sites. Oh! Okay, will do that right away. Thanks. From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Wed Nov 2 16:29:11 2011 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:29:11 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: References: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1320246991-sup-4366@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: I did /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -i CSWcswpki and installed all NEW 54 packages. At the end below message appeared. Do I need to worry about it? I don't have /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf on my system, so I create it? pki_auto was not set to 'yes' in /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf so the OpenCSW GPG keys are not being automatically managed. eg: echo 'pki_auto=yes' >> /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf If this variable had been set, we would have run: /opt/csw/bin/cswpki --import --force See /opt/csw/bin/cswpki --help for more information on handling this manually From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Nov 2 16:32:27 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:32:27 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: References: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1320246991-sup-4366@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1320247828-sup-9431@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from upen's message of Wed Nov 02 11:29:11 -0400 2011: > I did /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -i CSWcswpki and installed all NEW 54 > packages. At the end below message appeared. Do I need to worry about > it? I don't have /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf on my system, so I create it? > > pki_auto was not set to 'yes' in /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf > so the OpenCSW GPG keys are not being automatically managed. > eg: echo 'pki_auto=yes' >> /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf > > If this variable had been set, we would have run: > /opt/csw/bin/cswpki --import --force > > See /opt/csw/bin/cswpki --help for more information on > handling this manually I chose to not automatically import the keys by default but leave each site open to doing this. We provide the keys and let you import them (with the given command or manually). Optionally, if you add that value to csw.conf, they'll be automatically imported the next time the package changes. Some sites are more sensitive to this than others so I went for 'opt in' instead of 'opt out.' Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Wed Nov 2 16:52:12 2011 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:52:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Can't check signature: public key not found In-Reply-To: <1320247828-sup-9431@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1320246541-sup-2351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1320246991-sup-4366@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1320247828-sup-9431@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from upen's message of Wed Nov 02 11:29:11 -0400 2011: >> I did /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -i CSWcswpki and installed all NEW 54 >> packages. At the end below message appeared. Do I need to worry about >> it? I don't have /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf on my system, so I create it? >> >> pki_auto was not set to 'yes' in /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf >> so the OpenCSW GPG keys are not being automatically managed. >> eg: echo 'pki_auto=yes' >> /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf >> >> If this variable had been set, we would have run: >> /opt/csw/bin/cswpki --import --force >> >> See /opt/csw/bin/cswpki --help for more information on >> handling this manually > > I chose to not automatically import the keys by default but leave each > site open to doing this. ?We provide the keys and let you import them > (with the given command or manually). ?Optionally, if you add that > value to csw.conf, they'll be automatically imported the next time the > package changes. ?Some sites are more sensitive to this than others so > I went for 'opt in' instead of 'opt out.' Alright..thanks. I am going ahead with 'opt in' . ~aero From dam at opencsw.org Wed Nov 2 19:32:51 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:32:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> Hi Andrey, Am 01.11.2011 um 02:54 schrieb ?????????? ?????? ??????????: > Here is a patch on top of > https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake/trunk/ (r16053) > > I've updated remake to the current version and added build dependencies. > Compilation with sun studio fails with error so I switched to GCC3. I don't think it > is a big problem, because remake is mostly useful for debugging. The patch works > for me in Solaris 10 with mixed unstable + testing environment. > > Hope you find it useful. Remake really help debugging large Makefiles like GAR. I have applied a slightly modified patch as r16056: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/16056 GCC4 works fine, so I have used that one for now. However, it doesn't seem to link against libiconv.so.2 and libncurses.so.5, so I removed the deps. Packages are available in http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#remake Also I am in contact with the upstream developer Rocky Bernstein, it would be cool if you could do some testing on the upcoming version in GIT: Am 20.10.2011 um 18:03 schrieb Rocky Bernstein: > I recently released a new version of remake. > There is no Solaris package for it yet. Git sources for that if you > don't want to get via > git clone git://github.com/rocky/remake.git > > is in ~/src/external-vcs/remake. I used those to build libcdio rather > than gmake. It would be nice if that were a > Solaris package. > > Many thanks. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Nov 3 00:55:10 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:55:10 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] BoF at LISA 2011? Message-ID: <1320277503-sup-6263@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, There will be at least two OpenCSW maintainers at LISA 2011. If any of you are attending and have interest, we'd be willing to hold an OpenCSW BoF session. We could answer questions about the recent changes, planned changes, general issues, etc. It would also be a good time to suggest improvements you'd like to see (or air your grievances). We could also demonstrate GAR to build a package or explain how our toolchain for publishing packages works. Let me know. (Even if you don't want a BoF, I'd still love to meet you there.) Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Thu Nov 3 04:46:12 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?koi8-r?B?4s/OxMHSxc7LzyDhzsTSxcog98nUwczYxdfJ3g==?=) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:46:12 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi Andrey, > GCC4 works fine, so I have used that one for now. Looks like GAR expects gcc-4.6, but dublin, testing and unstable catalogs contain 4.3.3 only, so build fails. I see three choices: - compile gcc from GAR, install and rebuild (will take a lot of time) - ask for gcc upgrade in catalog (can affect a lot of other packages) - fix GAR to use currently available gcc version (might be complicated). What is preferred way? Also, you should update BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc3core to BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc4core when switching to gcc4 > Also I am in contact with the upstream developer Rocky Bernstein, it would be > cool if you could do some testing on the upcoming version in GIT: I'll test git version, but we need to fix GCC issues first. Best regards, Andrey From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Nov 3 10:41:46 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:41:46 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: 2011/11/3 ?????????? ?????? ?????????? : > Hi Andrey, > >> GCC4 works fine, so I have used that one for now. > > Looks like GAR expects gcc-4.6, but dublin, testing and unstable catalogs > contain 4.3.3 only, The unstable catalog contains gcc 4.6. You can see that by running: curl -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog \ | grep ^gcc4core > so build fails. I see three choices: > - compile gcc from GAR, install and rebuild (will take a lot of time) > - ask for gcc upgrade in catalog (can affect a lot of other packages) > - fix GAR to use currently available gcc version (might be complicated). > > What is preferred way? Try the unstable catalog. Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Thu Nov 3 14:25:50 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:25:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> Hi Andrey, Am 03.11.2011 um 04:46 schrieb ?????????? ?????? ??????????: >> GCC4 works fine, so I have used that one for now. > > Looks like GAR expects gcc-4.6, but dublin, testing and unstable catalogs > contain 4.3.3 only, so build fails. I see three choices: > - compile gcc from GAR, install and rebuild (will take a lot of time) > - ask for gcc upgrade in catalog (can affect a lot of other packages) > - fix GAR to use currently available gcc version (might be complicated). > > What is preferred way? As Maciej noted unstable has a fresh gcc 4.6 which GAR has been adjusted to use. > Also, you should update BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc3core > to BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc4core when switching to gcc4 I should have taken this out. The compiler could be checked by GAR if necessary. >> Also I am in contact with the upstream developer Rocky Bernstein, it would be >> cool if you could do some testing on the upcoming version in GIT: > > I'll test git version, but we need to fix GCC issues first. Cool. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Nov 4 01:05:57 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:05:57 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] solaris 9 is now best effort Message-ID: <1320364782-sup-1671@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, As Solaris 9 has now entered the Vintage/Extended support[1] phase, future package updates and new packages will be done on a best effort basis. Each maintainer will be able to decide whether supporting Solaris 9 is something they are willing or able to do. We apologize if the causes you any inconvenience. Thanks -Ben [1] http://blogs.oracle.com/patch/entry/solaris_9_transitioning_to_extended -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Mon Nov 7 03:38:56 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?koi8-r?B?4s/OxMHSxc7LzyDhzsTSxcog98nUwczYxdfJ3g==?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:38:56 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Who should close ticket in GAR trac Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5756@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi I had opened ticket #64 in GAR trac (https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/ticket/64). The issue was resolved. Now the fix works for me and code is in SVN trunk, but the ticket is still open. Who is responsible for closing it? Should I close ticked I have opened or I should leave it as is and GAR developers will close it when they think job is done? Thank you, Andrey From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Mon Nov 7 04:37:50 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?utf-8?B?0JHQvtC90LTQsNGA0LXQvdC60L4g0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCS0LjRgtCw0Ls=?= =?utf-8?B?0YzQtdCy0LjRhw==?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:37:50 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi Dago, > > Also, you should update BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc3core > > to BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc4core when switching to gcc4 > I should have taken this out. The compiler could be checked by GAR if necessary. I've tested it with GAR r16113: comment out BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc4core, remove gcc4core from a build system, then do make configure. Build fails with error configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables I suppose, it is a bug in GAR, but until it is fixed, I'd prefer to keep BUILD_DEP line. > GCC4 works fine, so I have used that one for now. However, it doesn't seem to link > against libiconv.so.2 and libncurses.so.5, so I removed the deps. After building with GCC4 from unstable on my system. ldd work/build-isa-sparcv8plus/remake-3.82+dbg0.8/make | grep csw libintl.so.8 => /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so.8 libreadline.so.6 => /opt/csw/lib/libreadline.so.6 libiconv.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libiconv.so.2 libncurses.so.5 => /opt/csw/lib/libncurses.so.5 Probably, configure strips readline and ncurses if they are not exists on a build host. I think, having readline and ncurses support for interactive debugger is nice feature, so returned deps on them. My changes on top of https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake (r16057) attached as remake-gcc4.patch I'll check git version of remake a bit later and get back with results. Best regards, Andrey -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: remake-gcc4.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1070 bytes Desc: remake-gcc4.patch URL: From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Mon Nov 7 04:43:19 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?utf-8?B?0JHQvtC90LTQsNGA0LXQvdC60L4g0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCS0LjRgtCw0Ls=?= =?utf-8?B?0YzQtdCy0LjRhw==?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:43:19 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Sorry, had a typo in my patch. Fixed patch attached. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: remake-gcc4.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1069 bytes Desc: remake-gcc4.patch URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Nov 7 10:45:40 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:45:40 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: 2011/11/7 ?????????? ?????? ?????????? : > Sorry, had a typo in my patch. Fixed patch attached. I tried, the patch doesn't apply. Which file is it against? The patch itself only says "Makefile". From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Nov 7 10:51:09 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:51:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Who should close ticket in GAR trac In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5756@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5756@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: 2011/11/7 ?????????? ?????? ?????????? : > Who is responsible for closing it? Should I close ticked I have opened or I should leave it > as is and GAR developers will close it when they think job is done? Technically it would be the developer, Dago, but we're rather relaxed about this, you can close the bug as well. Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Mon Nov 7 10:54:31 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:54:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Who should close ticket in GAR trac In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5756@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5756@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <45ED8192-D973-4321-8BB5-305746B8D146@opencsw.org> Hi Andrej, Am 07.11.2011 um 03:38 schrieb ?????????? ?????? ??????????: > I had opened ticket #64 in GAR trac (https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/ticket/64). > The issue was resolved. Now the fix works for me and code is in SVN trunk, but the ticket > is still open. > > Who is responsible for closing it? Should I close ticked I have opened or I should leave it > as is and GAR developers will close it when they think job is done? The owner (in this case me) usually closes it, I tend to do that after some time, e.g. right now :-) Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Mon Nov 7 11:12:38 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:12:38 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: Hi Andrej, Am 07.11.2011 um 04:37 schrieb ?????????? ?????? ??????????: >>> Also, you should update BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc3core >>> to BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc4core when switching to gcc4 >> I should have taken this out. The compiler could be checked by GAR if necessary. > > I've tested it with GAR r16113: comment out BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgcc4core, > remove gcc4core from a build system, then do make configure. Build fails with error > > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > I suppose, it is a bug in GAR, but until it is fixed, I'd prefer to keep BUILD_DEP line. Unfortunately the situation is not that easy. If you set the GARCOMPILER to GCC4 there are a number of variables set for c, c++, fortran, etc. which the program may or may not use. GAR may need to require all of them without knowing. Additionally, when you set the compiler to Sun Studio it can't verify that the Sun Studio package is installed as this uses multi-instance packages for the SUn Studio versions (11/12/12u1/12u2/...) GAR could fail with "No C compiler for for GCC4 at ..." as check for the missing binary. This whole situation looks a bit unclean to me and I am fully open to suggestions. >> GCC4 works fine, so I have used that one for now. However, it doesn't seem to link >> against libiconv.so.2 and libncurses.so.5, so I removed the deps. > > After building with GCC4 from unstable on my system. > > ldd work/build-isa-sparcv8plus/remake-3.82+dbg0.8/make | grep csw > libintl.so.8 => /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so.8 > libreadline.so.6 => /opt/csw/lib/libreadline.so.6 > libiconv.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libiconv.so.2 > libncurses.so.5 => /opt/csw/lib/libncurses.so.5 The ldd output shows what is needed to run the program, not what the program itself requires. If you take a look at "dump -Lv" you see that it needs libreadline.so.6 which then pulls in libncurses.so.5, and libintl.so.8 pulls in libiconv.so.2, so the dependencies are indirect and must not be added to the remake package itself, but to the package it depends on - they will pull in these deps: > unstable9s% dump -Lv remake > > remake: > > **** DYNAMIC SECTION INFORMATION **** > .dynamic: > [INDEX] Tag Value > [1] NEEDED libkstat.so.1 > [2] NEEDED libintl.so.8 > [3] NEEDED libreadline.so.6 > [4] NEEDED librt.so.1 > [5] NEEDED libc.so.1 > ... > unstable9s% ldd /opt/csw/lib/libreadline.so.6 > /usr/lib/secure/s9_preload.so.1 > libncurses.so.5 => /opt/csw/lib/libncurses.so.5 > libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > unstable9s% ldd /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so.8 > /usr/lib/secure/s9_preload.so.1 > libiconv.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libiconv.so.2 > libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 > /usr/platform/SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > I'll check git version of remake a bit later and get back with results. Cool. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Mon Nov 7 11:39:22 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?utf-8?B?0JHQvtC90LTQsNGA0LXQvdC60L4g0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCS0LjRgtCw0Ls=?= =?utf-8?B?0YzQtdCy0LjRhw==?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:39:22 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5AA9@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi > I tried, the patch doesn't apply. Which file is it against? The patch itself only says "Makefile". The patch is on top of remake trunk https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake/trunk/ From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Mon Nov 7 11:48:02 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?utf-8?B?0JHQvtC90LTQsNGA0LXQvdC60L4g0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCS0LjRgtCw0Ls=?= =?utf-8?B?0YzQtdCy0LjRhw==?=) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:48:02 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5AB8@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi Dago, > The ldd output shows what is needed to run the program, not what the program > itself requires. If you take a look at "dump -Lv" you see that it needs libreadline.so.6 > which then pulls in libncurses.so.5, and libintl.so.8 pulls in libiconv.so.2, so the > dependencies are indirect and must not be added to the remake package itself, > but to the package it depends on - they will pull in these deps: Now I understand why libiconv and libncurses deps may be removed. Thank you for explanation, Andrey From dam at opencsw.org Mon Nov 7 11:49:13 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:49:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5AA9@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5AA9@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <891F575F-8B81-43C7-91E4-B081938B2042@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 07.11.2011 um 11:39 schrieb ?????????? ?????? ??????????: >> I tried, the patch doesn't apply. Which file is it against? The patch itself only says "Makefile". > > The patch is on top of remake trunk > https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake/trunk/ The patch has some issues as I outlined in my previous mail, please lets first resolve these. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From bondarenko.av at mmk.ru Tue Nov 8 05:50:38 2011 From: bondarenko.av at mmk.ru (=?utf-8?B?0JHQvtC90LTQsNGA0LXQvdC60L4g0JDQvdC00YDQtdC5INCS0LjRgtCw0Ls=?= =?utf-8?B?0YzQtdCy0LjRhw==?=) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:50:38 +0600 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <891F575F-8B81-43C7-91E4-B081938B2042@opencsw.org> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5AA9@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <891F575F-8B81-43C7-91E4-B081938B2042@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DFB6D82@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Hi Dago, > The patch has some issues as I outlined in my previous mail, please lets first resolve these. I've removed dependencies on libiconv and libncurses from my patch. Also, I don't see any way to automatically determine what part of GCC needed for package building. So I'm keeping build dep on gcc4core, anyway gcc is only a workaround until compilation error with Solaris Studio gets fixed. I've attached my current patch (remake-gcc4-r1.patch) on top of https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake/trunk/ (r16056) Also, I've contacted upstream developer of remake Rocky Bernstein. It seems there is nothing to test in git. He says that master branch on github is in funky state and is not useable. Branch release-3.82+dbg0.8 is in state that was released on Oct 18 and we are already have it in GAR. Best regards, Andrey -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: remake-gcc4-r1.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 559 bytes Desc: remake-gcc4-r1.patch URL: From dam at opencsw.org Tue Nov 8 10:03:47 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:03:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Remake version bump to 3.82+dbg0.8 In-Reply-To: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DFB6D82@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> References: <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DE50B51@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <809AB1F0-D7B5-4140-8C24-7F698FB83639@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF53BD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <37D1335A-6E10-4170-A7FC-BD7A0F571421@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57CF@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF57DD@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DEF5AA9@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> <891F575F-8B81-43C7-91E4-B081938B2042@opencsw.org> <8F048E189BF2D84C8F2604829BFC4C8ABF6DFB6D82@MSE-CCR-MB2.hq.corp.mmk.chel.su> Message-ID: <12C84635-5A6C-4A25-92F3-BFAC96F249D5@opencsw.org> Hi Andrej, Am 08.11.2011 um 05:50 schrieb ?????????? ?????? ??????????: > I've removed dependencies on libiconv and libncurses from my patch. Also, I don't > see any way to automatically determine what part of GCC needed for package building. > So I'm keeping build dep on gcc4core, anyway gcc is only a workaround until compilation > error with Solaris Studio gets fixed. > > I've attached my current patch (remake-gcc4-r1.patch) on top of > https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/remake/trunk/ (r16056) Applied as r16134. > Also, I've contacted upstream developer of remake Rocky Bernstein. It seems there > is nothing to test in git. He says that master branch on github is in funky state and > is not useable. Branch release-3.82+dbg0.8 is in state that was released on Oct 18 > and we are already have it in GAR. Ah, ok. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From mark at proseconsulting.co.uk Mon Nov 28 14:26:44 2011 From: mark at proseconsulting.co.uk (Mark R Bannister) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:26:44 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] grangefields.co.uk Message-ID: <60222.1322486804@proseconsulting.co.uk> I see the UK mirror grangefields.co.uk is not responding again today. Had trouble last week too. Does anyone know what's going on with it? Thanks, Mark. From dam at opencsw.org Mon Nov 28 14:34:04 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:34:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] grangefields.co.uk In-Reply-To: <60222.1322486804@proseconsulting.co.uk> References: <60222.1322486804@proseconsulting.co.uk> Message-ID: <1DE7AA67-D969-4110-8401-5B1C8E929B8A@opencsw.org> Hi Mark, Am 28.11.2011 um 14:26 schrieb Mark R Bannister: > I see the UK mirror grangefields.co.uk is not responding again today. Had > trouble last week too. Does anyone know what's going on with it? Looks good from here, I don't see any outage now and it seems to be in current state too. If you observe more outages please let me know and I can talk to my contact at grangefields. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896