From sbn at tbricks.com  Thu Jun  7 16:53:20 2012
From: sbn at tbricks.com (Dmitri Shubin)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:53:20 +0400
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
Message-ID: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>

Hello!

I enabled GPG verification in pkgutil as described here 
http://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-administrators/getting-started.html 
and when trying to update catalog got the following:

# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -U
=> Fetching new catalog and descriptions 
(http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
Catalog 
/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10 
is not signed! Check your mirror settings or disable use_gpg in 
pkgutil.conf.
# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -V
- System -
Pkgutil         2.6.4
Arch            sparc
Solaris         5.10
Pkg patch       119317 (119317-01 installed)
GPG binary      /opt/csw/bin/gpg
Gzip binary     /bin/gzip
Mailx binary    /bin/mailx
MD5 binary      /opt/csw/bin/gmd5sum
MD5 module      2.33 (primary choice for MD5)
Perl            5.008004
Perl binary     /bin/perl
Wget binary     /usr/sfw/bin/wget
PATH            /bin:/usr/bin

- Configuration -
catalog_not_cached      true (default: true)
catalog_update          14 (default: 14)
deptree_filter_common   false (default: false)
exclude_pattern         not set (default: none)
gpg_homedir             not set (default: none)
maxpkglist              100000 (default: 10000)
mirror                  http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable
                         (default: 
http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing)
noncsw                  false (default: false)
pkgaddopts              not set (default: none)
pkgliststyle            2 (default: 0)
pkgrmopts               not set (default: none)
root_path               not set (default: /)
show_current            true (default: true)
stop_on_hook_soft_error not set (default: false)
use_gpg                 true (default: false)
use_md5                 true (default: false)
wgetopts                not set (default: none)

Is it expected?

Thanks!

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  7 16:55:44 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:55:44 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
In-Reply-To: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
References: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
Message-ID: <1339080903-sup-1982@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Dmitri Shubin's message of Thu Jun 07 10:53:20 -0400 2012:

Hi Dmitri,

> I enabled GPG verification in pkgutil as described here
> http://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-administrators/getting-started.html
> and when trying to update catalog got the following:

> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10 
> is not signed! Check your mirror settings or disable use_gpg in 
> pkgutil.conf.

The daemon has expired.  It should be restored to service shortly at
which point the catalogs will be signed again.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  7 16:56:16 2012
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:56:16 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
In-Reply-To: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
References: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
Message-ID: <CABY0g1UMS1sXSeNSf6fi6MXaQWCS9Do2cBFTmf9as8yK7Dofbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Dmitri Shubin <sbn at tbricks.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I enabled GPG verification in pkgutil as described here
> http://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-administrators/getting-started.html and
> when trying to update catalog got the following:
>
> # /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -U
> => Fetching new catalog and descriptions
> (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
> Catalog
> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
> is not signed! Check your mirror settings or disable use_gpg in
> pkgutil.conf.

The unstable catalog is not signed.

/peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  7 17:18:29 2012
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:18:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1UMS1sXSeNSf6fi6MXaQWCS9Do2cBFTmf9as8yK7Dofbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UMS1sXSeNSf6fi6MXaQWCS9Do2cBFTmf9as8yK7Dofbg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABY0g1UKASuGAK1SRwLyrWAn4LJLYwvEmiw-L2o-_KEAv=HZEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Dmitri Shubin <sbn at tbricks.com> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I enabled GPG verification in pkgutil as described here
>> http://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-administrators/getting-started.html and
>> when trying to update catalog got the following:
>>
>> # /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -U
>> => Fetching new catalog and descriptions
>> (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
>> Catalog
>> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
>> is not signed! Check your mirror settings or disable use_gpg in
>> pkgutil.conf.
>
> The unstable catalog is not signed.

I just realized my answer was not very helpful. :)

What I meant is that I confirmed that the catalog is indeed not signed
so from a technical point of view it's expected for pkgutil to say
that and abort. However, others are already working on restoring the
signing of the unstable catalog for you so you should soon be good to
go again.

/peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  7 17:28:07 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:28:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1UKASuGAK1SRwLyrWAn4LJLYwvEmiw-L2o-_KEAv=HZEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UMS1sXSeNSf6fi6MXaQWCS9Do2cBFTmf9as8yK7Dofbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABY0g1UKASuGAK1SRwLyrWAn4LJLYwvEmiw-L2o-_KEAv=HZEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-76AUy7Vkpx_JKAYZ1mThkrCqPhwYyJw0YUMkpuJf=81Q@mail.gmail.com>

2012/6/7 Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org>
> > The unstable catalog is not signed.
>
> I just realized my answer was not very helpful. :)
>
> What I meant is that I confirmed that the catalog is indeed not signed
> so from a technical point of view it's expected for pkgutil to say
> that and abort. However, others are already working on restoring the
> signing of the unstable catalog for you so you should soon be good to
> go again.

Yes, I restored the daemon and initiated catalog generation, it should
be ready in 30 minutes.

The problem was human error: when I thought I was restoring the
passphrase on an existing daemon, I was actually starting a new one.
We ended up with two signing daemons running at the same time. I'm not
sure what was the exact interplay between them, but apparently it led
to unsigned catalogs.

Maciej

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  7 17:38:49 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:38:49 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-76AUy7Vkpx_JKAYZ1mThkrCqPhwYyJw0YUMkpuJf=81Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UMS1sXSeNSf6fi6MXaQWCS9Do2cBFTmf9as8yK7Dofbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABY0g1UKASuGAK1SRwLyrWAn4LJLYwvEmiw-L2o-_KEAv=HZEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-76AUy7Vkpx_JKAYZ1mThkrCqPhwYyJw0YUMkpuJf=81Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-6F4y=uKr+BG7RcXSQmHn3G7coTxsOCZKsZ-f610G+t5Q@mail.gmail.com>

2012/6/7 Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
> Yes, I restored the daemon and initiated catalog generation, it should
> be ready in 30 minutes.

Signed catalogs have been pushed out.

Thanks for the report and sorry for the inconvenience!

Maciej

From sbn at tbricks.com  Thu Jun  7 17:41:36 2012
From: sbn at tbricks.com (Dmitri Shubin)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:41:36 +0400
Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil says "Catalog is not signed" when using GPG
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-6F4y=uKr+BG7RcXSQmHn3G7coTxsOCZKsZ-f610G+t5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FD0C060.6080309@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UMS1sXSeNSf6fi6MXaQWCS9Do2cBFTmf9as8yK7Dofbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABY0g1UKASuGAK1SRwLyrWAn4LJLYwvEmiw-L2o-_KEAv=HZEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-76AUy7Vkpx_JKAYZ1mThkrCqPhwYyJw0YUMkpuJf=81Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6F4y=uKr+BG7RcXSQmHn3G7coTxsOCZKsZ-f610G+t5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FD0CBB0.1000202@tbricks.com>

On 07.06.2012 19:38, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski wrote:
> 2012/6/7 Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski<maciej at opencsw.org>:
>> Yes, I restored the daemon and initiated catalog generation, it should
>> be ready in 30 minutes.
> Signed catalogs have been pushed out.
>
> Thanks for the report and sorry for the inconvenience!
>
It works now!
Thank you!

From ja at opencsw.org  Sat Jun  9 22:38:54 2012
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 22:38:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Packages for Munin 2.0.0 available in experimental
Message-ID: <3E927F5F-F9F2-45BA-985C-7D33845C87C4@opencsw.org>

Hi all,

as Munin 2.0.0 is out since end of May and some user like to see it in the OpenCSW repository, I pushed updated Munin packages into the experimental branch [1]. The packages are called now "munin_master", "munin_node" and "munin_common".

Before installing the new packages, please make a backup of your existing rrd files. They should be located under /etc/opt/csw/munin/db. The Munin developers say, that upgrading is straightforward and data loss should not occure, but better be cautious. 

Until now I could only test the installation of a fresh Munin master and node, so I'd really appreciate to get some feedback about upgrading from earlier versions to 2.0.0.

After installing the packages you will see a message with the necessary steps to get the node or the master running. On [2] the installation is described a little bit more in detail (not very comprehensive yet).

As Munin 2.x now creates it's graphs only via CGI scripts, the master's new configuration file has some new options. When upgrading from an earlier version, you need to merge your existing config file with the delivered config sample (as described in the installation message too). Just copying the new options into your config should work.

The configuration for the Apache Webserver has been changed too. Now the sample config creates a VirtualHost, read it carefully. The sample config is just taken from the Munin developers. If you have other suggestions - maybe without defining a virtual host - I'm glad to include one or two alternative config samples.

After a (fresh) installation of Munin wait for the first run of the master's cronjob. Before that you will get an error message in your browser like this:
"Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl/Munin/Master/HTMLOld.pm line 656."
The CGI script has just no data to work with.

So, feedback to improve the packages is very welcome. Enjoy!

[1] http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#ja
[2] http://wiki.opencsw.org/munin-package

Regards
Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 15 22:11:23 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:11:23 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW contact maintainer
In-Reply-To: <60F04036261FBE48A6E212697E81F43E09CB1CDA@CORREO001.R.LAN>
References: <201206141721.q5EHLx3Q021517@www.opencsw.org>
	<599669D4-E6C9-4398-8902-545C92BDEB9A@opencsw.org>
	<60F04036261FBE48A6E212697E81F43E09CB1CDA@CORREO001.R.LAN>
Message-ID: <9EA9FA30-AF79-4E3F-B866-305C774AB2FD@opencsw.org>

Hi Roberto,

(cc'ing users@)

Am 15.06.2012 um 09:24 schrieb Gallego Miguez, Roberto:
> De: Dagobert Michelsen [mailto:dam at opencsw.org] 
>> Am 14.06.2012 um 19:21 schrieb rgallegom at mundo-r.net:
>>> Today I try to install CSWtmux package on a Solaris 9 but tmux don\'t
>>> start, simply return the bash command line without any message. The
>>> truss output says:
>> 
>> I had problems with tmux on older releases before. Are you on sparc or
>> i386?
>> Which update release? (See /etc/release and uname -a)
> 
> 	The host is Solaris 9 update 8 SPARC. You can see below the
> uname -a output and the contents of /etc/release
> 
> ce at cor0001s174 [~]$ uname -a
> SunOS cor0001s174 5.9 Generic_122300-56 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
> ce at cor0001s174 [~]$ cat /etc/release
>                        Solaris 9 9/05 s9s_u8wos_05 SPARC
>           Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
>                        Use is subject to license terms.
>                            Assembled 04 August 2005
> 
> Thanks for your support,

This is really strange, I tried both 1.5 and 1.6 under Solaris 9 and both
terminate immediately. If I take the binary compiled on Solaris 9 to a Solaris 10
box it works just right. Most certainly this is not a compilation problem but
something on the code regarding portability on Solaris 9 which needs to be debugged.

It may also be connected to this bug I also haven't found yet:
  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4694

Unfortunately I don't have time to investigate this myself at the moment.
Please talk to upstream at
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/tmux/
I'll happily accept a patch to respin the package.


Best regards

  -- Dago



From ludvigb at gmail.com  Mon Jun 18 09:46:26 2012
From: ludvigb at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nils_Ludvig_Brandtz=E6g?=)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:46:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Reverted updates to the dublin catalog
Message-ID: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>

> We've rebuilt libneon in unstable, but we'll need to rebuild
> everything against libssl-1.0 to arrive at a good state. We've got a
> lot of rebuilding to do.

No updates to dublin since May 30, I assume this is the reason. Any
estimate for when updates will be released again?

-- 
ludvig

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 18 21:00:08 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej =?utf-8?Q?Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:00:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Reverted updates to the dublin catalog
In-Reply-To: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120618190008.GC19735@quince.home.blizinski.pl>

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:46:26AM +0200, Nils Ludvig Brandtz?g wrote:
> > We've rebuilt libneon in unstable, but we'll need to rebuild
> > everything against libssl-1.0 to arrive at a good state. We've got a
> > lot of rebuilding to do.
> 
> No updates to dublin since May 30, I assume this is the reason. Any
> estimate for when updates will be released again?

That's correct. I think we won't be doing (as a rule) any version bumps
to the dublin catalog anymore. We've set up additional build hosts with
dublin packages on them, and will use them to push security fixes. If
a security fix requires a version bump, we'll probably do it, unless we
find a backported patch with the fix.

We haven't figured out how to release directly to the dublin catalog,
which is one of the reasons for the lack of updates. Our pipeline
currently defaults to unstable, and we want to make sure that there are
no accidental pushes to dublin by someone who meant to push into
unstable. It'll requre some coding and testing before we'll get any new
updates to dublin.

The long term plan for dublin is for it to become the new stable.

Maciej

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 18 23:51:43 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:51:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW contact maintainer
In-Reply-To: <9EA9FA30-AF79-4E3F-B866-305C774AB2FD@opencsw.org>
References: <201206141721.q5EHLx3Q021517@www.opencsw.org>
	<599669D4-E6C9-4398-8902-545C92BDEB9A@opencsw.org>
	<60F04036261FBE48A6E212697E81F43E09CB1CDA@CORREO001.R.LAN>
	<9EA9FA30-AF79-4E3F-B866-305C774AB2FD@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <0C7860E9-79E2-4D28-B680-CF9447E7ADEA@opencsw.org>

Hi Roberto,

Am 15.06.2012 um 22:11 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Am 15.06.2012 um 09:24 schrieb Gallego Miguez, Roberto:
>> De: Dagobert Michelsen [mailto:dam at opencsw.org] 
>>> Am 14.06.2012 um 19:21 schrieb rgallegom at mundo-r.net:
>>>> Today I try to install CSWtmux package on a Solaris 9 but tmux don\'t
>>>> start, simply return the bash command line without any message. The
>>>> truss output says:
>>> 
>>> I had problems with tmux on older releases before. Are you on sparc or
>>> i386?
>>> Which update release? (See /etc/release and uname -a)
>> 
>> 	The host is Solaris 9 update 8 SPARC. You can see below the
>> uname -a output and the contents of /etc/release
>> 
>> ce at cor0001s174 [~]$ uname -a
>> SunOS cor0001s174 5.9 Generic_122300-56 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
>> ce at cor0001s174 [~]$ cat /etc/release
>>                       Solaris 9 9/05 s9s_u8wos_05 SPARC
>>          Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
>>                       Use is subject to license terms.
>>                           Assembled 04 August 2005
>> 
>> Thanks for your support,
> 
> This is really strange, I tried both 1.5 and 1.6 under Solaris 9 and both
> terminate immediately. If I take the binary compiled on Solaris 9 to a Solaris 10
> box it works just right. Most certainly this is not a compilation problem but
> something on the code regarding portability on Solaris 9 which needs to be debugged.
> 
> It may also be connected to this bug I also haven't found yet:
>  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4694
> 
> Unfortunately I don't have time to investigate this myself at the moment.
> Please talk to upstream at
>  http://sourceforge.net/projects/tmux/
> I'll happily accept a patch to respin the package.

Would you mind opening a bug at
  http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/set_project.php?project_id=2414
so your issue is not forgotten and you get informed when I probably have some
time later on. Did you have progress contacting upstream?


Best regards

  -- Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 19 09:31:07 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:31:07 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Reverted updates to the dublin catalog
In-Reply-To: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <04703EC9-B514-41EF-B430-F9C12030B66E@opencsw.org>

Hi Nils,

Am 18.06.2012 um 09:46 schrieb Nils Ludvig Brandtz?g:
>> We've rebuilt libneon in unstable, but we'll need to rebuild
>> everything against libssl-1.0 to arrive at a good state. We've got a
>> lot of rebuilding to do.
> 
> No updates to dublin since May 30, I assume this is the reason. Any
> estimate for when updates will be released again?

Dublin is essentially frozen with the exception of bugfixes as all goals
have been accomplished:
  http://wiki.opencsw.org/release-dublin
There are a number of issues in progress (as the OpenSSL 1.0 update) for
the upcoming "Kiel" release:
  http://wiki.opencsw.org/release-kiel

Just let me know if you have any questions about the release structure.


Best regards

  -- Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From ludvigb at gmail.com  Tue Jun 19 09:57:49 2012
From: ludvigb at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nils_Ludvig_Brandtz=E6g?=)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:57:49 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Reverted updates to the dublin catalog
In-Reply-To: <04703EC9-B514-41EF-B430-F9C12030B66E@opencsw.org>
References: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<04703EC9-B514-41EF-B430-F9C12030B66E@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CADL=-c0XXYJJfsVvKpwX_ShFxWuDhcF5Aw+1_n1UOBsMSQKuiw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dago,

> Dublin is essentially frozen with the exception of bugfixes as all goals
> have been accomplished:
> ?http://wiki.opencsw.org/release-dublin
> There are a number of issues in progress (as the OpenSSL 1.0 update) for
> the upcoming "Kiel" release:
> ?http://wiki.opencsw.org/release-kiel
>
> Just let me know if you have any questions about the release structure.

So "testing" will soon point to kiel instead of dublin? Do you have an
estimate of when for example subversion-1.7.5 (currently in unstable)
will be in testing?
-- 
Best regards,
Nils

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 20 14:52:43 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:52:43 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] GCC-4.7 in unstable
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-7bT20HpM7g6v-f3Bk2YN6azN89bNxQe51w_fuj9zb-Kw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALtRa-7bT20HpM7g6v-f3Bk2YN6azN89bNxQe51w_fuj9zb-Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-4aTfpqoRGWWySNoqSBVTnQtEdQJGNpA=FRV58uxi-Kag@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/31 Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>
>
> Heads up: GCC-4.7 has hit unstable
>
> It includes a new language frontend: Go[1].?GCC-4.7 is only available for
> Solaris 10.?It will not be included in the dublin catalog.

I've just uploaded a new version: gcc-4.7.1.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 22 00:47:01 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:47:01 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Reverted updates to the dublin catalog
In-Reply-To: <CADL=-c0XXYJJfsVvKpwX_ShFxWuDhcF5Aw+1_n1UOBsMSQKuiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADL=-c1vUxdV7=+hciEejHCn66DrO4mSdMveCX3ciEMxSmNd=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<04703EC9-B514-41EF-B430-F9C12030B66E@opencsw.org>
	<CADL=-c0XXYJJfsVvKpwX_ShFxWuDhcF5Aw+1_n1UOBsMSQKuiw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-7gP0fDw92JLojnQK8EWUO9=-L6Q_tHYQsHKjq54n+Z5A@mail.gmail.com>

2012/6/19 Nils Ludvig Brandtz?g <ludvigb at gmail.com>:
> So "testing" will soon point to kiel instead of dublin? Do you have an
> estimate of when for example subversion-1.7.5 (currently in unstable)
> will be in testing?

We don't have any estimates right now, sorry. There's an ongoing
project to upgrade OpenSSL. It isn't trivial, because dependencies
between binaries and libraries sometimes cause two versions of the SSL
library to be loaded at the same time, which causes crashes, or failed
checks.

binary1 ? libssl.so.1.0.0
binary1 ? library1
library1 ? libssl.so.0.9.8

(ouch!)

There's a project tracking page for the rebuild effort, you can get a
sense how much work it requires:

http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-openssl

We won't be able to responsibly call this ?testing?, before the
upgrade to openssl-1.0.0 is complete, or at least when we know that
there are no double linkages between binaries.

Once we get that sorted out, we'll think about promoting unstable to
testing. But this means that we have to make space for new testing, by
promoting dublin to stable. We think that we can't just flip the
symlink. If there are users who pull packages from stable, and
suddenly upgrade a lot of packages from the 2008 package catalog to
the 2012 state, they might get a lot of problems, and we don't want
that. We need to warn users about this, and we don't really have a
mechanism to do this reliably. See this discussion:

http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2012-March/016249.html

There are some ideas to implement catalog checking in pkgutil, but
there are still sites using pkg-get, so we're not sure we can depend
on pkgutil either. Maybe intentionally breaking upgrades from the
stable URL for a period of, say, 6 months or so, would do the job.

So, overall, there is a number of issues and a lot of work ahead of us.

As far as the promotion of dublin to stable is concerned, input from
users would be greatly appreciated. Do people still use stable? Does
anyone have performed a migration/upgrade from stable to dublin? If
so, how did it go?

Maciej

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Jun 27 07:41:25 2012
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:41:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] need help to compile GD perl module
Message-ID: <4FEA9D05.5070206@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,
i'm trying to compile GD:
http://search.cpan.org/~lds/GD-2.46/
on solaris 11 x86.
The problem is that it doesn't link wirth the correct libraries, the 
errors are:
libpng warning: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.2.44
libpng warning: Application  is  running with png.c from libpng-1.4.8
libpng warning: Incompatible libpng version in application and library

and
JPEG library reports unrecoverable error: Wrong JPEG library
version: library is 62, caller expects 70

i'm trying the follwing options:
perl Makefile.PL -lib_gd_path /opt/csw/lib -lib_png_path /opt/csw/lib 
-lib_jpeg_path /opt/csw/lib

but when i ldd the .so, i find:
ldd blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so
...
libjpeg.so.62 =>         /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
         ...
libpng14.so.14 =>        /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14
...
         libjpeg.so.7 =>  /opt/csw/lib/i386/libjpeg.so.7
         libpng12.so.0 =>         /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libpng12.so.0
...

the link command is:
LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib" /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc  -G -L/opt/csw/lib 
-L/opt/csw/bdb48/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib GD.o  -o 
blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so      -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lib 
-lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng -lz -lm -lgd 
-L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -liconv

how can i remove the libjpeg and libpng coming from /usr/lib ?

thanks in advance for help,

gerard

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 27 08:00:42 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:00:42 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] need help to compile GD perl module
In-Reply-To: <4FEA9D05.5070206@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4FEA9D05.5070206@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <914728E3-F0FB-4013-899D-403472453E7E@opencsw.org>

Hi Gerard,

Am 27.06.2012 um 07:41 schrieb Gerard Henry:
> i'm trying to compile GD:
> http://search.cpan.org/~lds/GD-2.46/
> on solaris 11 x86.
> The problem is that it doesn't link wirth the correct libraries, the errors are:
> libpng warning: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.2.44
> libpng warning: Application  is  running with png.c from libpng-1.4.8
> libpng warning: Incompatible libpng version in application and library
> 
> and
> JPEG library reports unrecoverable error: Wrong JPEG library
> version: library is 62, caller expects 70
> 
> i'm trying the follwing options:
> perl Makefile.PL -lib_gd_path /opt/csw/lib -lib_png_path /opt/csw/lib -lib_jpeg_path /opt/csw/lib
> 
> but when i ldd the .so, i find:
> ldd blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so
> ...
> libjpeg.so.62 =>         /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62
>        ...
> libpng14.so.14 =>        /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14
> ...
>        libjpeg.so.7 =>  /opt/csw/lib/i386/libjpeg.so.7
>        libpng12.so.0 =>         /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libpng12.so.0
> ...
> 
> the link command is:
> LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib" /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc  -G -L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/bdb48/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib GD.o  -o blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so      -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lib -lXpm -lX11 -ljpeg -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lpng -lz -lm -lgd -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -liconv
> 
> how can i remove the libjpeg and libpng coming from /usr/lib ?

I am already working on your bug report :-) There will be an update in an hour or so.

You need some tweaking of the args:
  http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/cpan/GD/trunk/Makefile


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896