From jh at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  1 14:48:58 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:48:58 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSWsamba -- `SUNW_1.22.7' not found
In-Reply-To: <5058419B.2010700@opencsw.org>
References: <50583BBC.8080308@rz-amper.de> <50583CA7.1060801@opencsw.org>
	<50583FF6.1020507@rz-amper.de> <5058419B.2010700@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <5069913A.3080302@opencsw.org>

Hi,
just a quick update:

There is no fix yet sorry,
hope to get it sorted soon.

Greetings
Jan



Am 18.09.12 11:40, schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
> Am 18.09.12 11:33, schrieb Markus Sonnenberg:
>>
>> thanks for the really quick answer. how long will it take for the global
>> fix? i'm in no hurry, just want to know when to check for the new
>> package. in a few days or weeks? oh, and thanks a lot. you guys are
>> doing a really great job.
> 
> The global fix that this does not happen again is in place.
> But the broken packages need to be fixed now.
> The samba package for sparc is fixed. For x86 this might take a few days
> since we have to fix the openldap libs first which for some funny reason
> are broken in the 64bit build.
> Anyway I will keep you posted when a new set of samba packages is released.
> 
> Greetings
> Jan
> 
> 


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Mon Oct  1 15:41:18 2012
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:18 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
Message-ID: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,

i have problems with python, failing to install virtualenv 
(http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv).
I've tried with easy_install and other methods, and it always fails, 
claiming about md5 module (not _md5)

t2000-root% /opt/csw/bin/python virtualenv.py my_new_env
New python executable in my_new_env/bin/python
Installing setuptools......
   Complete output from command 
/donnees/virtualenv/my_new_env/bin/python -c "#!python
\"\"\"Bootstra...sys.argv[1:])

" --always-copy -U setuptools:
   Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "<string>", line 67, in <module>
ImportError: No module named md5
----------------------------------------
...Installing setuptools...done.
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "virtualenv.py", line 2471, in <module>
     main()
   File "virtualenv.py", line 942, in main
     never_download=options.never_download)
   File "virtualenv.py", line 1052, in create_environment
     search_dirs=search_dirs, never_download=never_download)
   File "virtualenv.py", line 599, in install_setuptools
     search_dirs=search_dirs, never_download=never_download)
   File "virtualenv.py", line 571, in _install_req
     cwd=cwd)
   File "virtualenv.py", line 1020, in call_subprocess
     % (cmd_desc, proc.returncode))
OSError: Command /donnees/virtualenv/my_new_env/bin/python -c "#!python
\"\"\"Bootstra...sys.argv[1:])

" --always-copy -U setuptools failed with error code 1


any idea?

thanks in advance for help,


gerard

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Oct  1 15:50:59 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:50:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>

2012/10/1 Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

> hello all,
>
> i have problems with python, failing to install virtualenv (
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/**virtualenv<http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv>
> ).
> I've tried with easy_install and other methods, and it always fails,
> claiming about md5 module (not _md5)
>

Not sure why it complains about the md5 module, since has been deprecated.
But normally you only get a deprecation notice and the module loads.


>
> t2000-root% /opt/csw/bin/python virtualenv.py my_new_env
> New python executable in my_new_env/bin/python
> Installing setuptools......
>   Complete output from command /donnees/virtualenv/my_new_**env/bin/python
> -c "#!python
> \"\"\"Bootstra...sys.argv[1:])
>
> " --always-copy -U setuptools:
>   Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "<string>", line 67, in <module>
> ImportError: No module named md5
> ------------------------------**----------
> ...Installing setuptools...done.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "virtualenv.py", line 2471, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "virtualenv.py", line 942, in main
>     never_download=options.never_**download)
>   File "virtualenv.py", line 1052, in create_environment
>     search_dirs=search_dirs, never_download=never_download)
>   File "virtualenv.py", line 599, in install_setuptools
>     search_dirs=search_dirs, never_download=never_download)
>   File "virtualenv.py", line 571, in _install_req
>     cwd=cwd)
>   File "virtualenv.py", line 1020, in call_subprocess
>     % (cmd_desc, proc.returncode))
> OSError: Command /donnees/virtualenv/my_new_**env/bin/python -c "#!python
> \"\"\"Bootstra...sys.argv[1:])
>
> " --always-copy -U setuptools failed with error code 1
>
>
> any idea?
>

I've seen the same error. Did you dig down to the root cause? For example,
did you try replacing the md5 (obsolete module) import with an import of
the hashlib module?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121001/5827ab02/attachment.html>

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Sun Oct  7 08:58:54 2012
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:58:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

On 10/01/12 03:50 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski wrote:
> I've seen the same error. Did you dig down to the root cause? For
> example, did you try replacing the md5 (obsolete module) import with an
> import of the hashlib module?


but how?
i don't see where md5 is imported?
t2000 # ggrep -r md5 *
Binary file my_new_env/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload/_hashlib.so matches

seems to appear only in _hashlib.so coming from 
/opt/csw/lib/python/lib-dynload/_hashlib.so



anyway, md5 seems to be here:
t2000 # /opt/csw/bin/python
Python 2.6.8 (unknown, Sep 20 2012, 17:14:14) [C] on sunos5
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
 >>> import md5
__main__:1: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use 
hashlib instead
 >>>

my guess is that something is wrong in python, because it does:
Installing setuptools......
   Complete output from command 
/donnees/virtualenv/my_new_env/bin/python -c "#!python
\"\"\"Bootstra...sys.argv[1:])

" --always-copy -U setuptools:
   Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "<string>", line 67, in <module>
ImportError: No module named md5

First, i don't understand why it needs to install setuptools since it's 
here:
t2000 # pkginfo  CSWpysetuptools
application CSWpysetuptools pysetuptools - Distribution Utiltiies for Python

if i try to install setuptools manually and follow the "virtual" way:
t2000 # /opt/csw/bin/python virtual-python.py -v
Creating /root/lib/python2.6
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "virtual-python.py", line 122, in <module>
     main()
   File "virtual-python.py", line 86, in main
     for fn in os.listdir(stdlib_dir):
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6'

is it normal that this lib doesn't exist?
trying to create a simple link:
t2000 # ln -s /opt/csw/lib/python/ /opt/csw/lib/python2.6

then the error is more precise:
Installing setuptools...
   -c:67: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib 
instead
   Traceback (most recent call last):
     File "<string>", line 67, in <module>
     File "/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/md5.py", line 10, in <module>
       from hashlib import md5
     File "/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/hashlib.py", line 136, in <module>
       md5 = __get_builtin_constructor('md5')
     File "/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/hashlib.py", line 63, in 
__get_builtin_constructor
       import _md5
   ImportError: No module named _md5

it seems that this error is related to openssl libs?!
sorry no idea more

thanks for help,

gerard


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Oct  7 14:03:16 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 13:03:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Gerard,

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Gerard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> anyway, md5 seems to be here:
> t2000 # /opt/csw/bin/python
> Python 2.6.8 (unknown, Sep 20 2012, 17:14:14) [C] on sunos5
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>> import md5
> __main__:1: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib
> instead
>>>>
>
> my guess is that something is wrong in python, because it does:
>
> Installing setuptools......
>   Complete output from command /donnees/virtualenv/my_new_env/bin/python -c
> "#!python
> \"\"\"Bootstra...sys.argv[1:])

Notice the hashbang there.  Is it finding CSW's python, the virtualenv
python or the system python?  If it's finding the system python,
that's likely the problem.  Is /opt/csw/bin leading your path?  Above
you called ggrep without qualification so /opt/csw/bin is likely in
your path but then you called /opt/csw/bin/python so maybe it doesn't
have precedence over the system path's?

> First, i don't understand why it needs to install setuptools since it's
> here:
> t2000 # pkginfo  CSWpysetuptools
> application CSWpysetuptools pysetuptools - Distribution Utiltiies for Python

The documentation says that it does this intentionally.  It's likely
to help with things like the built-in pip that it also adds?

>
> if i try to install setuptools manually and follow the "virtual" way:
> t2000 # /opt/csw/bin/python virtual-python.py -v
> Creating /root/lib/python2.6
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "virtual-python.py", line 122, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "virtual-python.py", line 86, in main
>     for fn in os.listdir(stdlib_dir):
> OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6'
>
> is it normal that this lib doesn't exist?

This would depend on which packages you have installed, I think.  It
exists on the buildfarm boxes because we have CSWpydes installed, but
it's possible that it wouldn't be on your box...I wouldn't symlink it
though, I'd just create the tree, or better, install something that
delivers it for you like CSWpydes.  This _may_ be something that
should be addressed in the python package but I don't know for sure.

Hope this helps.  Once we know about your PATH settings things might
be clearer so we can provide better analysis.

Thanks
-Ben

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Sun Oct  7 18:42:36 2012
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:42:36 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5071B0FC.4070500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

On 10/07/12 02:03 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
> Notice the hashbang there.  Is it finding CSW's python, the virtualenv
> python or the system python?  If it's finding the system python,
> that's likely the problem.  Is /opt/csw/bin leading your path?  Above
> you called ggrep without qualification so /opt/csw/bin is likely in
> your path but then you called /opt/csw/bin/python so maybe it doesn't
> have precedence over the system path's?

t2000 # echo $PATH
/opt/csw/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/ucb

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct  9 16:13:20 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:13:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <5071B0FC.4070500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071B0FC.4070500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <CAP30j17Pn2fMKBUyhvmSoQJ19L1s8Ydbe-_QM59p1BsTeHyFMA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Gerard,

Ok, I've replicated your problem and am now debugging it.  I'll let
you know what I find out.

Thanks
-Ben

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct  9 22:10:19 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:10:19 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j17Pn2fMKBUyhvmSoQJ19L1s8Ydbe-_QM59p1BsTeHyFMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071B0FC.4070500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j17Pn2fMKBUyhvmSoQJ19L1s8Ydbe-_QM59p1BsTeHyFMA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAP30j17u7bWi=vFgmBhavME4zLetgNAeVB93+bww01M=PysGMQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Gerard,

> Ok, I've replicated your problem and am now debugging it.  I'll let
> you know what I find out.

Here is what I know so far:

1. The import of the md5 module is happening from a script called that
is stored in coded form in EZ_SETUP_PY in virtualenv.py
2. The failure to import md5 from either hashlib or the deprecated
module is because extra system paths in /opt/csw/lib/python aren't in
sys.path
3. The sys.path list is manipulated from inside the virtualenv
environment based on the site.py file in $venv/lib/python/site.py and
this is stored in virtualenv.py as SITE_PY.

If I modify site.py after the failed installation and add both
/opt/csw/lib/python and /opt/csw/lib/python/lib-dynload to sys.path
(at the end) and then run the extracted bootscript with -d
./myenv/lib/python2.6/site-packages the bootscript will succeed.
Without the -d argument, it expects a directory at
myenv/lib/python/site-packages with isn't created.

So, it seems that this is a conflict between the expectations of
virtualenv and CSW's python.  I'm out of time to spend on this tonight
but we can hopefully tweak virtualenv so that it will play nice with
CSW's python in a way that we can kick the patch upstream.

HTH.

Thanks
-Ben

From sbn at tbricks.com  Wed Oct 10 13:42:39 2012
From: sbn at tbricks.com (Dmitri Shubin)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:42:39 +0400
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
Message-ID: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>

Hello!

This page http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/packages/ says that GCC 4.7.2 is 
available in 'unstable' branch, but when trying to install CSWgcc4 
package I get only 4.6.3

$ /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -V
- System -
Pkgutil         2.6.5
Arch            i386
Solaris         5.10
Pkg patch       119318 (119318-01 installed)
GPG binary      not found (suggestion: install CSWgnupg)
Gzip binary     /bin/gzip
Mailx binary    /bin/mailx
MD5 binary      not found (suggestion: install CSWcoreutils)
MD5 module      2.33 (primary choice for MD5)
Perl            5.008004
Perl binary     /bin/perl
Wget binary     /usr/sfw/bin/wget
PATH            /bin:/usr/bin

- Configuration -
catalog_not_cached      true (default: true)
catalog_update          14 (default: 14)
deptree_filter_common   false (default: false)
exclude_pattern         not set (default: none)
gpg_homedir             not set (default: none)
maxpkglist              100000 (default: 10000)
mirror                  http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable
                         (default: 
http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing)
noncsw                  false (default: false)
pkgaddopts              not set (default: none)
pkgliststyle            2 (default: 0)
pkgrmopts               not set (default: none)
root_path               not set (default: /)
show_current            true (default: true)
stop_on_hook_soft_error not set (default: false)
use_gpg                 false (default: false)
use_md5                 false (default: false)
wgetopts                not set (default: none)

$ /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -a gcc4
You're not root and didn't set -W, using home dir.
common               package              catalog                        
size
gcc4ada              CSWgcc4ada           4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
55.9 MB
gcc4core             CSWgcc4core          4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
57.5 MB
gcc4corert_stub      CSWgcc4corert        4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
13.1 KB
gcc4g++              CSWgcc4g++           4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
33.8 MB
gcc4g++rt_stub       CSWgcc4g++rt         4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
13.0 KB
gcc4g95_stub         CSWgcc4g95           4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
13.0 KB
gcc4g95rt_stub       CSWgcc4g95rt         4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
13.0 KB
gcc4gfortran         CSWgcc4gfortran      4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
30.4 MB
gcc4gfortranrt_stub  CSWgcc4gfortranrt    4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
13.0 KB
gcc4java             CSWgcc4java          4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06       
116.8 MB
gcc4javart           CSWgcc4javart        4.3.3,REV=2009.05.07        
51.5 MB
gcc4objc             CSWgcc4objc          4.6.3,REV=2012.03.06        
27.3 MB
gcc4objcrt           CSWgcc4objcrt        4.3.3,REV=2009.05.07       
522.8 KB
ruby18_gcc4          CSWruby18-gcc4       1.8.7p334,REV=2011.03.24     
4.5 KB

TIA

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 10 13:53:52 2012
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:53:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
Message-ID: <CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Dmitri Shubin <sbn at tbricks.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This page http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/packages/ says that GCC 4.7.2 is
> available in 'unstable' branch, but when trying to install CSWgcc4 package I
> get only 4.6.3

I think gcc was rolled back. The package page unfortunately only
displays one view of our packages so sometimes you get discrepancies.

/peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 10 13:58:31 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:58:31 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>

Hi Dmitri,

Am 10.10.2012 um 13:53 schrieb Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org>:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Dmitri Shubin <sbn at tbricks.com> wrote:
>> This page http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/packages/ says that GCC 4.7.2 is
>> available in 'unstable' branch, but when trying to install CSWgcc4 package I
>> get only 4.6.3
> 
> I think gcc was rolled back. The package page unfortunately only
> displays one view of our packages so sometimes you get discrepancies.


It was rolled back because it required Solaris 10u10, nonetheless all
packages ever released are available at
  http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/allpkgs/
and if you have 10u10 you can install 4.7.2 manually. Hopefully 4.7.2 will
be fixable to bind to an older release.


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From sbn at tbricks.com  Wed Oct 10 14:47:10 2012
From: sbn at tbricks.com (Dmitri Shubin)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:47:10 +0400
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>

Hi Dagobert,

On 10.10.2012 15:58, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> It was rolled back because it required Solaris 10u10, nonetheless all
> packages ever released are available at
>    http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/allpkgs/
> and if you have 10u10 you can install 4.7.2 manually. Hopefully 4.7.2 will
> be fixable to bind to an older release.
>
It's a pity since as I already wrote here 
http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2012-April/009209.html G++ 
4.6.3 doesn't work for us.
And we have GCC/G++ 4.7.1 installed that is successfully working on 
Solaris 10 (tested U6, U9 and U10)

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 10 16:26:09 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:26:09 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
	<50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>
Message-ID: <519D9FA0-573F-4BA3-B080-19F1B6464BAF@opencsw.org>

Hi Dmitri,

Am 10.10.2012 um 14:47 schrieb Dmitri Shubin <sbn at tbricks.com>:
> On 10.10.2012 15:58, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> It was rolled back because it required Solaris 10u10, nonetheless all
>> packages ever released are available at
>>   http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/allpkgs/
>> and if you have 10u10 you can install 4.7.2 manually. Hopefully 4.7.2 will
>> be fixable to bind to an older release.
> 
> It's a pity since as I already wrote here http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2012-April/009209.html G++ 4.6.3 doesn't work for us.
> And we have GCC/G++ 4.7.1 installed that is successfully working on Solaris 10 (tested U6, U9 and U10)


Are you referring to 4.7.1,REV=2012.06.19 ? If yes, Maciej could just respin that version
and rerelease that one for now.


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 10 16:30:50 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:30:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <519D9FA0-573F-4BA3-B080-19F1B6464BAF@opencsw.org>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
	<50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>
	<519D9FA0-573F-4BA3-B080-19F1B6464BAF@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-5Kkkh-hz2pYu1H3gWc+AkWOsTTDiCVWGMwLfxavVJp8Q@mail.gmail.com>

2012/10/10 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
> Are you referring to 4.7.1,REV=2012.06.19 ? If yes, Maciej could just respin that version
> and rerelease that one for now.

I could cherry pick and upload the 4.7.1 version from allpkgs. If I
rebuild the 4.7.1 it will be just as broken as 4.7.2 because the
problem isn't in the gcc code, but in our buildfarm setup.

I would like to encourage those who care to look at bug 5008[1] and
get GCC to build with the map file.

[1] https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5008

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 10 16:41:27 2012
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:41:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-5Kkkh-hz2pYu1H3gWc+AkWOsTTDiCVWGMwLfxavVJp8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
	<50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>
	<519D9FA0-573F-4BA3-B080-19F1B6464BAF@opencsw.org>
	<CALtRa-5Kkkh-hz2pYu1H3gWc+AkWOsTTDiCVWGMwLfxavVJp8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55CE9B8F-94F3-4E8E-A45E-7E5B398BF2F8@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 10.10.2012 um 16:30 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski <maciej at opencsw.org>:
> 2012/10/10 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Are you referring to 4.7.1,REV=2012.06.19 ? If yes, Maciej could just respin that version
>> and rerelease that one for now.
> 
> I could cherry pick and upload the 4.7.1 version from allpkgs. If I
> rebuild the 4.7.1 it will be just as broken as 4.7.2 because the
> problem isn't in the gcc code, but in our buildfarm setup.
> 
> I would like to encourage those who care to look at bug 5008[1] and
> get GCC to build with the map file.
> 
> [1] https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5008

I do understand that we need to get this sorted out. Should I try to provide
an u8 somehow?


Best regards

  -- Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 10 17:14:27 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:14:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <55CE9B8F-94F3-4E8E-A45E-7E5B398BF2F8@opencsw.org>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
	<50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>
	<519D9FA0-573F-4BA3-B080-19F1B6464BAF@opencsw.org>
	<CALtRa-5Kkkh-hz2pYu1H3gWc+AkWOsTTDiCVWGMwLfxavVJp8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<55CE9B8F-94F3-4E8E-A45E-7E5B398BF2F8@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-5s+dRcSbHMBW_ZCFQhGd-V5XzDkPgQYX5M26XuD7yBww@mail.gmail.com>

2012/10/10 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
> I do understand that we need to get this sorted out. Should I try to provide
> an u8 somehow?

I successfully pushed the old build of 4.7.1 back to unstable, so the
immediate issues should be resolved, no need for u8. If we invest time
in it, we should work on this problem:

ld: fatal: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file .libs/compatibility.o:
symbol __gxx_personality_v0: offset 0xe29b3 is non-aligned
ld: fatal: relocation error: R_SPARC_32: file
.libs/compatibility-atomic-c++0x.o: symbol __gxx_personality_v0:
offset 0xe2d9f is non-aligned

Maciej

From sbn at tbricks.com  Thu Oct 11 09:16:03 2012
From: sbn at tbricks.com (Dmitri Shubin)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:16:03 +0400
Subject: [csw-users] Is unstable catalog broken?
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-5s+dRcSbHMBW_ZCFQhGd-V5XzDkPgQYX5M26XuD7yBww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50755F2F.7020501@tbricks.com>
	<CABY0g1UbD78zUEZw6a9qYN1EM4k---Fjzv3vejpjh_UezVc6xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3F66FFB7-2A45-4AB8-A31F-33E340BBDA0B@opencsw.org>
	<50756E4E.2050504@tbricks.com>
	<519D9FA0-573F-4BA3-B080-19F1B6464BAF@opencsw.org>
	<CALtRa-5Kkkh-hz2pYu1H3gWc+AkWOsTTDiCVWGMwLfxavVJp8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<55CE9B8F-94F3-4E8E-A45E-7E5B398BF2F8@opencsw.org>
	<CALtRa-5s+dRcSbHMBW_ZCFQhGd-V5XzDkPgQYX5M26XuD7yBww@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50767233.3090401@tbricks.com>

Hi Maciej,

On 10.10.2012 19:14, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski wrote:
> 2012/10/10 Dagobert Michelsen<dam at opencsw.org>:
>> I do understand that we need to get this sorted out. Should I try to provide
>> an u8 somehow?
> I successfully pushed the old build of 4.7.1 back to unstable, so the
> immediate issues should be resolved, no need for u8. If we invest time
> in it, we should work on this problem:
>
Thank you!
Works for me now.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Oct 20 18:19:19 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:19:19 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j17u7bWi=vFgmBhavME4zLetgNAeVB93+bww01M=PysGMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071B0FC.4070500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j17Pn2fMKBUyhvmSoQJ19L1s8Ydbe-_QM59p1BsTeHyFMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP30j17u7bWi=vFgmBhavME4zLetgNAeVB93+bww01M=PysGMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAP30j1569WzrkmzP-0q7bvNoHHfRQGotmvyZ7nM9ZAJYSxE3vw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Gerard,

>> Ok, I've replicated your problem and am now debugging it.  I'll let
>> you know what I find out.
>
> Here is what I know so far:

I've narrowed this down to the following problem:

CSWpython has the library path hacked at build time to be
/opt/csw/lib/python instead of /opt/csw/lib/python2.6.  (This hack
goes back quite a while as documented in the mailing list archives.)
This is causing the problem with virtualenv which expects that
standard layout.  There are two solutions:

1. Hack the heck out of virtualenv to support the CSW environment.  I
wouldn't expect upstream to accept this work back so it would be sunk
time, imo.
2. Fix the CSWpython layout.  This will take time as all packages
delivering files to the non-traditional location will need to be
updated as well.

I'm willing to work on #2 but I don't want to invest much more time in
#1 as it's not my itch. :)

Thanks
-Ben

From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Mon Oct 22 07:52:29 2012
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:52:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] python broken?
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j1569WzrkmzP-0q7bvNoHHfRQGotmvyZ7nM9ZAJYSxE3vw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50699D7E.9020006@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CALtRa-6bmrjPuQ63KyymCePNtSaAg0frSYpEv1OyBbXwhJ-c9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071282E.5050500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j14PMKin29dJHB8fmEQO7Jm-bkY3vQVYb4mJTLAJiN7EdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5071B0FC.4070500@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<CAP30j17Pn2fMKBUyhvmSoQJ19L1s8Ydbe-_QM59p1BsTeHyFMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP30j17u7bWi=vFgmBhavME4zLetgNAeVB93+bww01M=PysGMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP30j1569WzrkmzP-0q7bvNoHHfRQGotmvyZ7nM9ZAJYSxE3vw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5084DF1D.4000009@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

On 10/20/12 06:19 PM, Ben Walton wrote:

> 1. Hack the heck out of virtualenv to support the CSW environment.  I
> wouldn't expect upstream to accept this work back so it would be sunk
> time, imo.
> 2. Fix the CSWpython layout.  This will take time as all packages
> delivering files to the non-traditional location will need to be
> updated as well.
>
> I'm willing to work on #2 but I don't want to invest much more time in
> #1 as it's not my itch. :)
>

very thanks for this job!

gerard

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Mon Oct 22 22:50:59 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:50:59 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
Message-ID: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>

Hi Everyone,

We've had a request to install Node.js.  If you look at the opencsw 
packages list on the website it shows v0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18.  But, if 
you search for the package using pkgutil it doesn't show up.

Is Node.js really part of the opencsw repository?  If so, how is it 
installed?  Also, looking at http://nodejs.org/ the latest version is 
v0.8.12.  If that one can be placed in the repository that would be ideal.

Thanks,
   Lenny

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 22 22:57:52 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:57:52 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Lenny,

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We've had a request to install Node.js.  If you look at the opencsw packages
> list on the website it shows v0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18.  But, if you search for
> the package using pkgutil it doesn't show up.

The website reflects packages/versions from the unstable catalog
currently.  If you're running current (hopefully the case for
production) then it likely hasn't been migrated to that catalog yet.
We should have a catalog update coming soon...the blocker is our SSL
rebuild project right now.  We need to update anything that links
against 0.9.8 to use 1.0.0 instead.

HTH.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take the risk of thinking for yourself.  Much more happiness,
truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Oct 22 22:57:52 2012
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:57:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <CABY0g1VD2YdSv8UbSuexmW7L=bbNoGUDGokheYjCcByVGmyRFw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We've had a request to install Node.js.  If you look at the opencsw packages
> list on the website it shows v0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18.  But, if you search for
> the package using pkgutil it doesn't show up.
>
> Is Node.js really part of the opencsw repository?  If so, how is it
> installed?  Also, looking at http://nodejs.org/ the latest version is
> v0.8.12.  If that one can be placed in the repository that would be ideal.

Any chance you're still on Solaris 9?

PACKAGING_PLATFORMS = solaris10-sparc solaris10-i386

/peter

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Mon Oct 22 23:08:58 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:08:58 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu>

Ah OK, thanks for the update Ben.  Yes, you're right we're pointing to 
the current catalog and not the unstable.  Since this is a production 
service we'll wait for it to migrate to the current catalog.

I know this may be a tough question but do you know when the new current 
catalog will be updated?  That is, when you say *soon*, could that mean 
a week?  Month?  Or?  I know it may be difficult to guesstimate since 
the problems you may run into with a massive project like the one you 
mention.

Thanks for the quick response,
   Lenny

On 10/22/2012 04:57 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
> Hi Lenny,
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> We've had a request to install Node.js.  If you look at the opencsw packages
>> list on the website it shows v0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18.  But, if you search for
>> the package using pkgutil it doesn't show up.
>
> The website reflects packages/versions from the unstable catalog
> currently.  If you're running current (hopefully the case for
> production) then it likely hasn't been migrated to that catalog yet.
> We should have a catalog update coming soon...the blocker is our SSL
> rebuild project right now.  We need to update anything that links
> against 0.9.8 to use 1.0.0 instead.
>
> HTH.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
>

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Mon Oct 22 23:10:23 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:10:23 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1VD2YdSv8UbSuexmW7L=bbNoGUDGokheYjCcByVGmyRFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1VD2YdSv8UbSuexmW7L=bbNoGUDGokheYjCcByVGmyRFw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5085B63F.8010002@buffalo.edu>

On 10/22/2012 04:57 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> We've had a request to install Node.js.  If you look at the opencsw packages
>> list on the website it shows v0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18.  But, if you search for
>> the package using pkgutil it doesn't show up.
>>
>> Is Node.js really part of the opencsw repository?  If so, how is it
>> installed?  Also, looking at http://nodejs.org/ the latest version is
>> v0.8.12.  If that one can be placed in the repository that would be ideal.
>
> Any chance you're still on Solaris 9?
>
> PACKAGING_PLATFORMS = solaris10-sparc solaris10-i386

We're running on solaris 10 (sparc).

Lenny

> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Mon Oct 22 23:37:06 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:37:06 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>

Oh, just to see if our developers wanted to play with the unstable 
version of Node.js I couldn't find it there either per the following 
after I modified pkgutil.conf to point to the unstable catalog:

 > sudo pkgutil --catalog
=> Fetching new catalog and descriptions 
(http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
==> 3669 packages loaded from 
/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
 > sudo pkgutil -a | grep -i node
leafnode             CSWleafnode          1.11.6,REV=2009.04.02 
273.0 KB
munin_node           CSWmunin-node        2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 
286.1 KB
muninnode_stub       CSWmuninnode         2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 
2.6 KB
pm_treedagnode       CSWpmtreedagnode     1.06,REV=2010.06.16 
47.3 KB

Thanks,
   Lenny

On 10/22/2012 05:08 PM, Lenny Miceli wrote:
> Ah OK, thanks for the update Ben.  Yes, you're right we're pointing to
> the current catalog and not the unstable.  Since this is a production
> service we'll wait for it to migrate to the current catalog.
>
> I know this may be a tough question but do you know when the new current
> catalog will be updated?  That is, when you say *soon*, could that mean
> a week?  Month?  Or?  I know it may be difficult to guesstimate since
> the problems you may run into with a massive project like the one you
> mention.
>
> Thanks for the quick response,
>    Lenny
>
> On 10/22/2012 04:57 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
>> Hi Lenny,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> We've had a request to install Node.js.  If you look at the opencsw
>>> packages
>>> list on the website it shows v0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18.  But, if you
>>> search for
>>> the package using pkgutil it doesn't show up.
>>
>> The website reflects packages/versions from the unstable catalog
>> currently.  If you're running current (hopefully the case for
>> production) then it likely hasn't been migrated to that catalog yet.
>> We should have a catalog update coming soon...the blocker is our SSL
>> rebuild project right now.  We need to update anything that links
>> against 0.9.8 to use 1.0.0 instead.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Ben
>>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 23 00:24:16 2012
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:24:16 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
> Oh, just to see if our developers wanted to play with the unstable version
> of Node.js I couldn't find it there either per the following after I
> modified pkgutil.conf to point to the unstable catalog:
>
>> sudo pkgutil --catalog
> => Fetching new catalog and descriptions
> (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
> ==> 3669 packages loaded from
> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
>> sudo pkgutil -a | grep -i node
> leafnode             CSWleafnode          1.11.6,REV=2009.04.02 273.0 KB
> munin_node           CSWmunin-node        2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 286.1 KB
> muninnode_stub       CSWmuninnode         2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 2.6 KB
> pm_treedagnode       CSWpmtreedagnode     1.06,REV=2010.06.16 47.3 KB

Note that you don't have to pipe to grep:

# pkgutil -a nodejs
common               package              catalog                        size
nodejs               CSWnodejs            0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18        2.9 MB

It's only there for i386, whether that's a bug or not I don't know but
that's why you don't see it.

/peter

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Tue Oct 23 00:50:27 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:50:27 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5085CDB3.7090604@buffalo.edu>

On 10/22/2012 6:24 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>> Oh, just to see if our developers wanted to play with the unstable version
>> of Node.js I couldn't find it there either per the following after I
>> modified pkgutil.conf to point to the unstable catalog:
>>
>>> sudo pkgutil --catalog
>> => Fetching new catalog and descriptions
>> (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
>> ==> 3669 packages loaded from
>> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
>>> sudo pkgutil -a | grep -i node
>> leafnode             CSWleafnode          1.11.6,REV=2009.04.02 273.0 KB
>> munin_node           CSWmunin-node        2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 286.1 KB
>> muninnode_stub       CSWmuninnode         2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 2.6 KB
>> pm_treedagnode       CSWpmtreedagnode     1.06,REV=2010.06.16 47.3 KB
>
> Note that you don't have to pipe to grep:
>
> # pkgutil -a nodejs
> common               package              catalog                        size
> nodejs               CSWnodejs            0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18        2.9 MB
>
> It's only there for i386, whether that's a bug or not I don't know but
> that's why you don't see it.

   Ah OK, thanks for the info Peter.

Lenny

>
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From jh at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 23 08:10:44 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:10:44 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org>

Hi,
Am 23.10.12 00:24, schrieb Peter Bonivart:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>> Oh, just to see if our developers wanted to play with the unstable version
>> of Node.js I couldn't find it there either per the following after I
>> modified pkgutil.conf to point to the unstable catalog:
>>
>>> sudo pkgutil --catalog
>> => Fetching new catalog and descriptions
>> (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
>> ==> 3669 packages loaded from
>> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
>>> sudo pkgutil -a | grep -i node
>> leafnode             CSWleafnode          1.11.6,REV=2009.04.02 273.0 KB
>> munin_node           CSWmunin-node        2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 286.1 KB
>> muninnode_stub       CSWmuninnode         2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 2.6 KB
>> pm_treedagnode       CSWpmtreedagnode     1.06,REV=2010.06.16 47.3 KB
> 
> Note that you don't have to pipe to grep:
> 
> # pkgutil -a nodejs
> common               package              catalog                        size
> nodejs               CSWnodejs            0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18        2.9 MB
> 
> It's only there for i386, whether that's a bug or not I don't know but
> that's why you don't see it.

It's correct we don't have a sparc build as the v8 engine does not build
on sparc iirc.

Greetings
Jan



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 23 08:29:32 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:29:32 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAP30j14NefQ095C+fG0UUhjwZqXT-=GnMq6vHtNtwb-tWnWJOw@mail.gmail.com>

> It's correct we don't have a sparc build as the v8 engine does not build
> on sparc iirc.

And the web site displays info for the i386 catalog.  That explains
the discrepancy you're seeing...

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take the risk of thinking for yourself.  Much more happiness,
truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Tue Oct 23 13:53:39 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:53:39 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <50868543.7050203@buffalo.edu>

OK that explains it Jan.  Thanks for the information.  Looking closely 
at the binaries supplied at nodejs.org they are only for x86.  I'll let 
my developers know that Node.js is not an option on sparc.

Thanks Ben, for clarifying that the website shows the i386 catalog.  The 
OpenCSW team may want to consider making that clear in the description 
at the top of the software list web site since it only mentions it's the 
*unstable* branch and not the *i386 unstable* branch.

I know it's probably already been discussed but either on the software 
list page or when you click on the detail link for a piece of software 
(like Node.js) you may want to include the platform(s) available for the 
software.  I'm assuming more than this software is only available on one 
solaris platform but maybe I'm wrong.

Thanks everyone for your help, I'm all set,
   Lenny

On 10/23/2012 2:10 AM, Jan Holzhueter wrote:
> Hi,
> Am 23.10.12 00:24, schrieb Peter Bonivart:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>>> Oh, just to see if our developers wanted to play with the unstable version
>>> of Node.js I couldn't find it there either per the following after I
>>> modified pkgutil.conf to point to the unstable catalog:
>>>
>>>> sudo pkgutil --catalog
>>> => Fetching new catalog and descriptions
>>> (http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable/sparc/5.10) if available ...
>>> ==> 3669 packages loaded from
>>> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_unstable_sparc_5.10
>>>> sudo pkgutil -a | grep -i node
>>> leafnode             CSWleafnode          1.11.6,REV=2009.04.02 273.0 KB
>>> munin_node           CSWmunin-node        2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 286.1 KB
>>> muninnode_stub       CSWmuninnode         2.0.6,REV=2012.09.02 2.6 KB
>>> pm_treedagnode       CSWpmtreedagnode     1.06,REV=2010.06.16 47.3 KB
>>
>> Note that you don't have to pipe to grep:
>>
>> # pkgutil -a nodejs
>> common               package              catalog                        size
>> nodejs               CSWnodejs            0.6.18,REV=2012.05.18        2.9 MB
>>
>> It's only there for i386, whether that's a bug or not I don't know but
>> that's why you don't see it.
>
> It's correct we don't have a sparc build as the v8 engine does not build
> on sparc iirc.
>
> Greetings
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 23 14:17:46 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:17:46 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <50868543.7050203@buffalo.edu>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org> <50868543.7050203@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <CAP30j15Jbsm3RpihpusjV--96-T_==UpEuzD-mWYN+mo3Whdow@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Lenny,

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:

> Thanks Ben, for clarifying that the website shows the i386 catalog.  The
> OpenCSW team may want to consider making that clear in the description at
> the top of the software list web site since it only mentions it's the
> *unstable* branch and not the *i386 unstable* branch.

We're planning to provide info for all catalogs in a nice web ui but
so far nobody has had the time/willingness to craft such a thing.
It's on the discussion list for our "summer" camp that is coming up
shortly though.  In the meantime, I'll see about adding info to the
display pages to make the current situation clear.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take the risk of thinking for yourself.  Much more happiness,
truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Oct 23 16:11:20 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:11:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j15Jbsm3RpihpusjV--96-T_==UpEuzD-mWYN+mo3Whdow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org> <50868543.7050203@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15Jbsm3RpihpusjV--96-T_==UpEuzD-mWYN+mo3Whdow@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-5VDFzXu-y_LYLzGo7Pv04QkNcoK1d+p3qa-znCAsd4iQ@mail.gmail.com>

2012/10/23 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>

> We're planning to provide info for all catalogs in a nice web ui but
> so far nobody has had the time/willingness to craft such a thing.
> It's on the discussion list for our "summer" camp that is coming up
> shortly though.  In the meantime, I'll see about adding info to the
> display pages to make the current situation clear.
>

I had this demo I wrote some time ago:
http://quinoa.blizinski.pl/~maciej/opencsw/test.html

It's purely client-side, we can just drop that into the website and it will
work.

Maciej
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121023/41bb9b76/attachment.html>

From chrisridd at mac.com  Tue Oct 23 22:40:19 2012
From: chrisridd at mac.com (Chris Ridd)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:40:19 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Node.js JavaScript interpreter missing
In-Reply-To: <50868543.7050203@buffalo.edu>
References: <5085B1B3.40609@buffalo.edu>
	<CAP30j15F=ht5rTRiQu1zbfmzCFJF6yCMXjLedXphk3KVOGcO2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085B5EA.3040502@buffalo.edu> <5085BC82.5060804@buffalo.edu>
	<CABY0g1XBo_f0aekxnaV2kRcfw451vpwyD=FiuqQXAUbiqRidEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<508634E4.1030706@opencsw.org> <50868543.7050203@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <9BC8A642-4F49-4EEF-A79F-316C33C9391F@mac.com>

On 23 Oct 2012, at 12:53, Lenny Miceli <miceli at buffalo.edu> wrote:

> OK that explains it Jan.  Thanks for the information.  Looking closely at the binaries supplied at nodejs.org they are only for x86.  I'll let my developers know that Node.js is not an option on sparc.

If you're looking for recent Solaris 10 (x86) binaries then Peter Tribble makes these available at http://www.petertribble.co.uk/Solaris/node.html

Cheers

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121023/902c5c22/attachment.html>

From ngrundma at uni-muenster.de  Thu Oct 25 06:56:10 2012
From: ngrundma at uni-muenster.de (Norbert Grundmann)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:56:10 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] gcc4 problems...
Message-ID: <5088C66A.8040202@uni-muenster.de>

Hello,

I have a question about compiling some c source using gcc4 and got the 
anser:

./configure
...
*configure: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
*See `config.log' for more details.
...

I installed CSWgcc4core and CSWgcc4g++ and put /opt/csw/bin in front of 
the PATH

What is missing?

Thanks for help, Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121025/db6e469b/attachment.html>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 25 08:48:24 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:48:24 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] gcc4 problems...
In-Reply-To: <5088C66A.8040202@uni-muenster.de>
References: <5088C66A.8040202@uni-muenster.de>
Message-ID: <CAP30j15WQQcu7r=H-dLnd7m5eBEy264jRZ8a7KhEYQAjfc9QfA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Norbert,

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Norbert Grundmann
<ngrundma at uni-muenster.de> wrote:

> I have a question about compiling some c source using gcc4 and got the
> anser:
>
> ./configure
> ...
> configure: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
> See `config.log' for more details.

Could you copy in the relevant parts of config.log for us to see?  I
wonder if this is a problem with gcc4 or (my suspicion) a broken
configure script.  If you point me/us at the problematic source
project, I'd take a look for you.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take the risk of thinking for yourself.  Much more happiness,
truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From ngrundma at uni-muenster.de  Thu Oct 25 08:56:59 2012
From: ngrundma at uni-muenster.de (Norbert Grundmann)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:56:59 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] gcc4 problems...
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j15WQQcu7r=H-dLnd7m5eBEy264jRZ8a7KhEYQAjfc9QfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5088C66A.8040202@uni-muenster.de>
	<CAP30j15WQQcu7r=H-dLnd7m5eBEy264jRZ8a7KhEYQAjfc9QfA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5088E2BB.6080605@uni-muenster.de>

Thanks for your interest...  Just now I found a way - I installed system 
headers with

pkg install system/header

and then everything worked...  But is it neccessary to mix Oracle (pkg) 
and OpwnCSW (pkgutil) packages?

Cheers, Norbert


On 10/25/2012 08:48, Ben Walton wrote:
> Hi Norbert,
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Norbert Grundmann
> <ngrundma at uni-muenster.de> wrote:
>
>> I have a question about compiling some c source using gcc4 and got the
>> anser:
>>
>> ./configure
>> ...
>> configure: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
>> See `config.log' for more details.
> Could you copy in the relevant parts of config.log for us to see?  I
> wonder if this is a problem with gcc4 or (my suspicion) a broken
> configure script.  If you point me/us at the problematic source
> project, I'd take a look for you.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben


-- 
Institute of Bioinformatics
Faculty of Medicine
University of Muenster, Germany
fax: +49-251-8353005
phone: +49-251-8353007

Use *BSD because Linux is a patch for Linux


From jh at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 25 09:21:37 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:21:37 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] gcc4 problems...
In-Reply-To: <5088E2BB.6080605@uni-muenster.de>
References: <5088C66A.8040202@uni-muenster.de>
	<CAP30j15WQQcu7r=H-dLnd7m5eBEy264jRZ8a7KhEYQAjfc9QfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5088E2BB.6080605@uni-muenster.de>
Message-ID: <5088E881.1010708@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 25.10.12 08:56, schrieb Norbert Grundmann:
> Thanks for your interest...  Just now I found a way - I installed system
> headers with
> 
> pkg install system/header
> 
> and then everything worked...  But is it neccessary to mix Oracle (pkg)
> and OpwnCSW (pkgutil) packages?

for system headers yes. We don't provide them and on Solaris 11 or
whatever IPS based system you use they are not installed by default anymore.

Greetings
Jan



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 25 09:30:47 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:30:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] gcc4 problems...
In-Reply-To: <5088E2BB.6080605@uni-muenster.de>
References: <5088C66A.8040202@uni-muenster.de>
	<CAP30j15WQQcu7r=H-dLnd7m5eBEy264jRZ8a7KhEYQAjfc9QfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5088E2BB.6080605@uni-muenster.de>
Message-ID: <CAP30j14+zyNdxSd0==_nXwnrNFe04VbKyap_GsA9_yBD=sfM=w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Norbert Grundmann
<ngrundma at uni-muenster.de> wrote:
> Thanks for your interest...  Just now I found a way - I installed system
> headers with
>
> pkg install system/header
>
> and then everything worked...  But is it neccessary to mix Oracle (pkg) and
> OpwnCSW (pkgutil) packages?

Well, for building software, you'll often need the "dev" packages for
system libraries (which will include the header files and the .so
symlinks) so that's normal.  Glad you found a resolution for the
problem.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take the risk of thinking for yourself.  Much more happiness,
truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Thu Oct 25 16:46:15 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:46:15 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
	missing
Message-ID: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu>

Hi Everyone,

Since we can't use Node.js since we're running Solaris sparc our 
developers are going to try to use Mozilla's SpiderMonkey.

So I installed libjs1_7_0 from the current repository and it only seems 
to include the library per:

 > pkgutil -L libjs1_7_0
/opt/csw/lib/libjs.so.1.7.0
/opt/csw/share/doc/libjs1_7_0
/opt/csw/share/doc/libjs1_7_0/license
 >

The OpenCSW description says "The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript 
interpreter and library, libjs.so.1.7.0" so we also would assume that 
the "js" binary would be included.  Does anyone know why the binary is 
not included?  I do understand that the web page only reflects the x86 
unstable branch of packages but I would assume the binary would be 
included for sparc and in the current repository.

BTW, the js binary is mentioned in the Makefile at:
 
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/spidermonkey/branches/js-1.7/Makefile

Thanks for any light someone can shed on this,
   Lenny

From jh at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 25 17:07:10 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:07:10 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 25.10.12 16:46, schrieb Lenny Miceli:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Since we can't use Node.js since we're running Solaris sparc our
> developers are going to try to use Mozilla's SpiderMonkey.
> 
> So I installed libjs1_7_0 from the current repository and it only seems
> to include the library per:
> 
>> pkgutil -L libjs1_7_0
> /opt/csw/lib/libjs.so.1.7.0
> /opt/csw/share/doc/libjs1_7_0
> /opt/csw/share/doc/libjs1_7_0/license
>>
> 
> The OpenCSW description says "The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript
> interpreter and library, libjs.so.1.7.0" so we also would assume that
> the "js" binary would be included.  Does anyone know why the binary is
> not included?  I do understand that the web page only reflects the x86
> unstable branch of packages but I would assume the binary would be
> included for sparc and in the current repository.
> 

I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
include it. (It seems to build fine)
Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
Sorry for that.

Greetings
Jan




From miceli at buffalo.edu  Thu Oct 25 17:14:04 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:14:04 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <5089573C.2070502@buffalo.edu>

Thanks Jan for the quick response.  I'll wait until it's rebuilt and 
then will update the package on my server.

Thanks again,
   Lenny

On 10/25/2012 11:07 AM, Jan Holzhueter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 25.10.12 16:46, schrieb Lenny Miceli:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Since we can't use Node.js since we're running Solaris sparc our
>> developers are going to try to use Mozilla's SpiderMonkey.
>>
>> So I installed libjs1_7_0 from the current repository and it only seems
>> to include the library per:
>>
>>> pkgutil -L libjs1_7_0
>> /opt/csw/lib/libjs.so.1.7.0
>> /opt/csw/share/doc/libjs1_7_0
>> /opt/csw/share/doc/libjs1_7_0/license
>>>
>>
>> The OpenCSW description says "The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript
>> interpreter and library, libjs.so.1.7.0" so we also would assume that
>> the "js" binary would be included.  Does anyone know why the binary is
>> not included?  I do understand that the web page only reflects the x86
>> unstable branch of packages but I would assume the binary would be
>> included for sparc and in the current repository.
>>
>
> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
> include it. (It seems to build fine)
> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
> Sorry for that.
>
> Greetings
> Jan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 25 17:36:23 2012
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:36:23 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
	missing
In-Reply-To: <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu>
	<5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jan,

> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
> include it. (It seems to build fine)
> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.

It looks like the CSWspidermonkey package was simply never
released...?  If I get a chance tonight I'll crank them out to save
you the cycles tomorrow.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take the risk of thinking for yourself.  Much more happiness,
truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Oct 25 18:55:39 2012
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:55:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
	missing
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>

2012/10/25 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
>> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
>> include it. (It seems to build fine)
>> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
>
> It looks like the CSWspidermonkey package was simply never
> released...?  If I get a chance tonight I'll crank them out to save
> you the cycles tomorrow.

It's my fault, I wrote the build. I was only interested in the library
and didn't pay attention to other files. One problem is that the
spidermonkey build does not have the install target, so I had to write
my own. See "install-custom" in this file:

https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/spidermonkey/branches/js-1.7/Makefile

So it's simply an omission, and if the file is there, it simple to add
a ginstall invocation and put the file into a package. I'll let Jan do
it.

Maciej

From jh at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 26 13:58:00 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:58:00 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org>

Hi,
there is no a cswspidermonkey package in the unstable cataloge.

Greetings

Jan



Am 25.10.12 18:55, schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski:
> 2012/10/25 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
>>> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
>>> include it. (It seems to build fine)
>>> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
>>
>> It looks like the CSWspidermonkey package was simply never
>> released...?  If I get a chance tonight I'll crank them out to save
>> you the cycles tomorrow.
> 
> It's my fault, I wrote the build. I was only interested in the library
> and didn't pay attention to other files. One problem is that the
> spidermonkey build does not have the install target, so I had to write
> my own. See "install-custom" in this file:
> 
> https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/spidermonkey/branches/js-1.7/Makefile
> 
> So it's simply an omission, and if the file is there, it simple to add
> a ginstall invocation and put the file into a package. I'll let Jan do
> it.
> 
> Maciej
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 


From jh at opencsw.org  Fri Oct 26 13:58:41 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:58:41 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <508A7AF1.1090108@opencsw.org>

Am 26.10.12 13:58, schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
> Hi,
> there is no a cswspidermonkey package in the unstable cataloge.

This is a "now"
Coffee Time :)

Greetings

Jan

> 
> Am 25.10.12 18:55, schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski:
>> 2012/10/25 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>>> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
>>>> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
>>>> include it. (It seems to build fine)
>>>> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
>>>
>>> It looks like the CSWspidermonkey package was simply never
>>> released...?  If I get a chance tonight I'll crank them out to save
>>> you the cycles tomorrow.
>>
>> It's my fault, I wrote the build. I was only interested in the library
>> and didn't pay attention to other files. One problem is that the
>> spidermonkey build does not have the install target, so I had to write
>> my own. See "install-custom" in this file:
>>
>> https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/spidermonkey/branches/js-1.7/Makefile
>>
>> So it's simply an omission, and if the file is there, it simple to add
>> a ginstall invocation and put the file into a package. I'll let Jan do
>> it.
>>
>> Maciej
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> 


From miceli at buffalo.edu  Fri Oct 26 23:41:39 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:41:39 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <508A7AF1.1090108@opencsw.org>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org> <508A7AF1.1090108@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <508B0393.9090607@buffalo.edu>

Thanks for working on this Jan.  I now see the software in the unstable 
branch.  When will it move to the current/stable branch?

Thanks,
   Lenny

On 10/26/2012 07:58 AM, Jan Holzhueter wrote:
> Am 26.10.12 13:58, schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
>> Hi,
>> there is no a cswspidermonkey package in the unstable cataloge.
>
> This is a "now"
> Coffee Time :)
>
> Greetings
>
> Jan
>
>>
>> Am 25.10.12 18:55, schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski:
>>> 2012/10/25 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
>>>>> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
>>>>> include it. (It seems to build fine)
>>>>> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the CSWspidermonkey package was simply never
>>>> released...?  If I get a chance tonight I'll crank them out to save
>>>> you the cycles tomorrow.
>>>
>>> It's my fault, I wrote the build. I was only interested in the library
>>> and didn't pay attention to other files. One problem is that the
>>> spidermonkey build does not have the install target, so I had to write
>>> my own. See "install-custom" in this file:
>>>
>>> https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/spidermonkey/branches/js-1.7/Makefile
>>>
>>> So it's simply an omission, and if the file is there, it simple to add
>>> a ginstall invocation and put the file into a package. I'll let Jan do
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Maciej
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> users at lists.opencsw.org
>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From miceli at buffalo.edu  Tue Oct 30 19:52:51 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:51 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <508B0393.9090607@buffalo.edu>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org> <508A7AF1.1090108@opencsw.org>
	<508B0393.9090607@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <50902203.9040104@buffalo.edu>

Hi Jan,

   Any idea when this will move to the current/stable branch?

Thanks,
   Lenny

On 10/26/2012 05:41 PM, Lenny Miceli wrote:
> Thanks for working on this Jan.  I now see the software in the unstable
> branch.  When will it move to the current/stable branch?
>
> Thanks,
>    Lenny
>
> On 10/26/2012 07:58 AM, Jan Holzhueter wrote:
>> Am 26.10.12 13:58, schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
>>> Hi,
>>> there is no a cswspidermonkey package in the unstable cataloge.
>>
>> This is a "now"
>> Coffee Time :)
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>>
>>> Am 25.10.12 18:55, schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski:
>>>> 2012/10/25 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know why we don't have the spidermonkey shell in a package.
>>>>>> I see no reason why not. If I have the time tomorrow I will try to
>>>>>> include it. (It seems to build fine)
>>>>>> Maybe someone else will pick it up earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like the CSWspidermonkey package was simply never
>>>>> released...?  If I get a chance tonight I'll crank them out to save
>>>>> you the cycles tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> It's my fault, I wrote the build. I was only interested in the library
>>>> and didn't pay attention to other files. One problem is that the
>>>> spidermonkey build does not have the install target, so I had to write
>>>> my own. See "install-custom" in this file:
>>>>
>>>> https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/spidermonkey/branches/js-1.7/Makefile
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So it's simply an omission, and if the file is there, it simple to add
>>>> a ginstall invocation and put the file into a package. I'll let Jan do
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Maciej
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> users at lists.opencsw.org
>>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users

From jh at opencsw.org  Wed Oct 31 14:25:21 2012
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:25:21 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <50902203.9040104@buffalo.edu>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org> <508A7AF1.1090108@opencsw.org>
	<508B0393.9090607@buffalo.edu> <50902203.9040104@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <509126C1.6080300@opencsw.org>

Hi

Am 30.10.12 19:52, schrieb Lenny Miceli:
> Hi Jan,
> 
>   Any idea when this will move to the current/stable branch?
> 

sorry was offline the last few days.

I try to sort that asap.




From miceli at buffalo.edu  Wed Oct 31 14:35:01 2012
From: miceli at buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:35:01 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript interpreter binary
 missing
In-Reply-To: <509126C1.6080300@opencsw.org>
References: <508950B7.8040608@buffalo.edu> <5089559E.5010804@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j16Qm9y7UwndGMOm13NKvBEh5hvhmLP0sUa-dC25tvQ2BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-6shyd0CoOdtP5io8-2SkoCUS32fkabcyYDZ+-H0WJXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<508A7AC8.3020807@opencsw.org> <508A7AF1.1090108@opencsw.org>
	<508B0393.9090607@buffalo.edu> <50902203.9040104@buffalo.edu>
	<509126C1.6080300@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <50912905.7020109@buffalo.edu>

Cool, thanks Jan.

Lenny

On 10/31/2012 9:25 AM, Jan Holzhueter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 30.10.12 19:52, schrieb Lenny Miceli:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>    Any idea when this will move to the current/stable branch?
>>
>
> sorry was offline the last few days.
>
> I try to sort that asap.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>