maciej at opencsw.org
Sat Apr 13 12:30:26 CEST 2013
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Wyche, George PW wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Wyche, George PW
> > <George.Wyche at pw.utc.com> wrote:
> > > On the http://wiki.opencsw.org/catalog-format page, the link
> > > http://www.opencsw.org/standards/categories does not work.
> > >
> > > Is there someone to tell or is this message sufficient?
> > The link is referring to the old site, sorry about that. It explained
> > some things that are shown in the examples, I guess we could add that
> > to fix it. Not sure if we have archived the old site though.
> > Is there something specific you're wondering about right now?
> > /peter
> I have had excellent success with "python link.py http://<blah>/<top>.html" in pointing out broken links.
What's link.py? Is it something like linkchecker?
> I already posted a question which was some motivation for my looking into the catalog format.
> What *is* on the catalog-format page gives me some direction about arranging for the perl script to work for me with the packages I am making. However, when I find something like this "broken" on the page, then I become less excited, because, "If this is broken, then what else may be wrong?"
We're aware of the problem, the typical scenario applies: people who use
the system already know what they need to know so they don't read the
People who need the documentation could fix it, but since they don't
know what's right and what's not, so they can't fix it.
My latest approach is deleting stuff, under the assumption that no
documentation is better than wrong documentation. If there's not
documentation then you can go and ask people or read the code, both of
which will give you the right answer.
So let's maybe do this: when you need information about anything, and
you see a page that looks wrong, let us know here or on IRC and we'll
either confirm that the documentation is up to date, or update it, or
In the meantime, I fixed a couple of broken links, but adjusting
redirects. The redirects currently are:
# Backward compatibility redirects
RedirectMatch permanent ^/maintainer-signup$ http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup
RedirectMatch permanent ^/extend-it/request-a-package http://www.opencsw.org/requestPackage
RedirectMatch permanent ^/get-it/pkg-get/?$ http://www.opencsw.org/get-it/pkgutil/
RedirectMatch permanent ^/userguide /manual/
RedirectMatch permanent ^/standards/build_farm$ http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/
RedirectMatch permanent ^/standards/core_principles$ /about/core-principles/
# The broad standards regex needs to be last
RedirectMatch permanent ^/standards http://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/
If anyone spots any further broken links, let us know so we can add
appropriate HTTP redirects.
More information about the users