From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 16 14:41:22 2014 From: dam at opencsw.org (dam) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:41:22 +0200 Subject: OpenCSW question about package CSWapache24 In-Reply-To: <201410161024.s9GAO7tC004578@www.opencsw.org> References: <201410161024.s9GAO7tC004578@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Daniel, Am 2014-10-16 12:24, schrieb daniel.bossert at dabo.ch: > I wanted to install apache2.4 on Solaris 10 SPARC. However, when I > access a php-file, then firefox tells he want\'s to download it > instead of executing it. > > I ve seen that there is a package called ap2_modphp5, but that works > only with apache2.2 . > > Is there somewhere an analog package for 2.4 or how can I execute php > files? Not yet. Unfortunately maintainer headcount is declining and until someone steps up to make packages for php5 and apache 2.4 there won't be packages. Sorry. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 16 16:43:51 2014 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:43:51 +0200 Subject: OpenCSW contact maintainer In-Reply-To: <201410142145.s9ELjlV1012630@www.opencsw.org> References: <201410142145.s9ELjlV1012630@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <821BCA67-7239-447B-BD7B-C639929EDDA9@opencsw.org> Hi David, Am 14.10.2014 um 23:45 schrieb david.r.linn at vanderbilt.edu: > I have a question about OpenCSW apache24 (2.4.7,REV=2014.02.21). > > In the httpd.conf file, there are a number of references to //opt/csw > (yes, that\'s 2 slashes before \"opt\"). Is this a substitution error or is this intentional (making use of something I haven\'t found in the apache 2.4 manual). Here are some of the instances of the string: > > ./httpd.conf.CSW:DocumentRoot \"/var//opt/csw/apache2/htdocs\" > ./httpd.conf.CSW: This looks like a substitution error. I am still looking into the build recipe where this artifact comes from. Would you mind also opening a bug report? This way I can properly track the issue. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From toni+opencsw-users at stderr.at Wed Oct 22 16:17:25 2014 From: toni+opencsw-users at stderr.at (Toni Schmidbauer) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:17:25 +0200 Subject: updated ruby20/puppet3 packages Message-ID: <87fvegb34a.fsf@stderr.at> hi, i'm just getting my feet wet with building opencsw packages with mgar. we are using puppet on solaris and i would like to update the puppet3 packages. as far as i know the current maintainer of the puppet3 packages is no longer interested in updating to a newer version (https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5150). what i've done so far: - updated the puppet3 Makefile to puppet 3.6.2 and added a dependency on ruby20. the current ruby version used for puppet (1.8) is old and according to ruby-lang.org out of maintenance. - created a new package for hiera, as the puppet master now depends on it - refactored the ruby20 package into ruby20, ruby20_ri and ruby20_dev and added a dependency on libssl_1_0_0 we are going to do some more testing with these new packages and i would love to bring these changes upstream. what's not quite clear to me is how do i bring these changes upstream? should i open bug reports for puppet3 and ruby20? what about the new hiera package? or should i post patches? sorry for all the questions, any help would be appreciated thanks toni -- Don't forget, there is no security | toni at stderr dot at -- Wulfgar | Toni Schmidbauer From dhollen at mosis.com Wed Oct 22 19:14:56 2014 From: dhollen at mosis.com (David Hollenberg) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:14:56 -0700 Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1j not in testing catalog Message-ID: <5447E610.2090209@mosis.com> I see that package CSWlibssl1-0-0 has been updated to OpenSSL 1.0.1j in the unstable catalog, but doesn't seem to be in the testing catalog (which is what we are using). Is this latest version going to be in the testing catalog any time soon? If not, is there a way to get just that one package from the unstable catalog, since it has fixes for vulnerabilities? Dave From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Oct 22 20:41:34 2014 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:41:34 +0100 Subject: updated ruby20/puppet3 packages In-Reply-To: <87fvegb34a.fsf@stderr.at> References: <87fvegb34a.fsf@stderr.at> Message-ID: Hi Tony, This is great! I would recommend that you apply to become a maintainer by writing to board at opencsw.org. This will get you commit rights and access to the build farm. Thanks -Ben On Oct 22, 2014 3:14 PM, "Toni Schmidbauer" wrote: > hi, > > i'm just getting my feet wet with building opencsw packages with > mgar. we are using puppet on solaris and i would like to update the > puppet3 packages. as far as i know the current maintainer of the puppet3 > packages is no longer interested in updating to a newer version > (https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5150). > > what i've done so far: > > - updated the puppet3 Makefile to puppet 3.6.2 and added a dependency on > ruby20. the current ruby version used for puppet (1.8) is old and > according to ruby-lang.org out of maintenance. > > - created a new package for hiera, as the puppet master now depends on > it > > - refactored the ruby20 package into ruby20, ruby20_ri and ruby20_dev > and added a dependency on libssl_1_0_0 > > we are going to do some more testing with these new packages and i would > love to bring these changes upstream. > > what's not quite clear to me is how do i bring these changes upstream? > should i open bug reports for puppet3 and ruby20? what about the new > hiera package? > > or should i post patches? > > sorry for all the questions, any help would be appreciated > > thanks > toni > -- > Don't forget, there is no security | toni at stderr dot at > -- Wulfgar | Toni Schmidbauer > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Oct 22 20:56:40 2014 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:56:40 +0200 Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1j not in testing catalog In-Reply-To: <5447E610.2090209@mosis.com> References: <5447E610.2090209@mosis.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:14 PM, David Hollenberg wrote: > > I see that package CSWlibssl1-0-0 has been updated to OpenSSL 1.0.1j in > the unstable catalog, but doesn't seem to be in the testing catalog > (which is what we are using). Is this latest version going to be in > the testing catalog any time soon? If not, is there a way to get just > that one package from the unstable catalog, since it has fixes for > vulnerabilities? Packages without major bugs reported against them are automatically moved from unstable to testing after 14 days so there's a few days left for OpenSSL. If you can't wait you should be able to do something like this: # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/unstable -i libssl1_0_0 If it tries to pull deps you don't want you can add "--nodeps". /peter From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 23 00:27:52 2014 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:27:52 +0100 Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1j not in testing catalog In-Reply-To: References: <5447E610.2090209@mosis.com> Message-ID: 2014-10-22 19:56 GMT+01:00 Peter Bonivart : > Packages without major bugs reported against them are automatically > moved from unstable to testing after 14 days so there's a few days > left for OpenSSL. Here is the current state, updated once a day: http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/package-promotions/promote-packages.html From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 23 12:52:13 2014 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:52:13 +0200 Subject: updated ruby20/puppet3 packages In-Reply-To: References: <87fvegb34a.fsf@stderr.at> Message-ID: <589211AD-637D-4FC5-9548-4FFF58417A6F@opencsw.org> Hi Toni, > Am 22.10.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Ben Walton : > This is great! I would recommend that you apply to become a maintainer by writing to board at opencsw.org . This will get you commit rights and access to the build farm. > > This is excellent news! We are really looking forward for you to join the project. Best regards ? Dago > Thanks > -Ben > > On Oct 22, 2014 3:14 PM, "Toni Schmidbauer" > wrote: > hi, > > i'm just getting my feet wet with building opencsw packages with > mgar. we are using puppet on solaris and i would like to update the > puppet3 packages. as far as i know the current maintainer of the puppet3 > packages is no longer interested in updating to a newer version > (https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5150 ). > > what i've done so far: > > - updated the puppet3 Makefile to puppet 3.6.2 and added a dependency on > ruby20. the current ruby version used for puppet (1.8) is old and > according to ruby-lang.org out of maintenance. > > - created a new package for hiera, as the puppet master now depends on > it > > - refactored the ruby20 package into ruby20, ruby20_ri and ruby20_dev > and added a dependency on libssl_1_0_0 > > we are going to do some more testing with these new packages and i would > love to bring these changes upstream. > > what's not quite clear to me is how do i bring these changes upstream? > should i open bug reports for puppet3 and ruby20? what about the new > hiera package? > > or should i post patches? > > sorry for all the questions, any help would be appreciated > > thanks > toni > -- > Don't forget, there is no security | toni at stderr dot at > -- Wulfgar | Toni Schmidbauer -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 30 09:30:28 2014 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:30:28 +0100 Subject: New package request : libgmp 5.1 In-Reply-To: <201410290849.s9T8nGWG004984@www.opencsw.org> References: <201410290849.s9T8nGWG004984@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Yuri, > Am 29.10.2014 um 09:49 schrieb via pkgrequests : > > Dear maintainers, > > A new package request has been received from Yuri (mailto:yvoinov at gmail.com). libgmp 5.1 is requested to be added to our catalog. > > Here is the attached message : > > Hi guys, I really need fresh version of GMP library ASAP. Please assign new maintainer to do that. Thanks. This is a volunteer project, so if there is someone around who wants a new gmp for himself he will probably do it. We are always looking for maintainers, so if you are able to help your contribution is very welcome. Nonetheless I?ll post the request and see if there is interest among the maintainers to make an updated package. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 30 10:42:22 2014 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:42:22 +0000 Subject: Inactive maintainer accounts have been retired Message-ID: Hello OpenCSW maintainers and users, We've done a cleanup of maintainer accounts. Some maintainer accounts were not active for a long time. If a maintainer did not upload a package in the last 2 years, we've changed the account status to 'Retired'. This allows our website to display information which is closer to the truth. Changing status to retired is a reversible operation, so if anybody wants to come back and build packages, please do! Many thanks go to Ben for handling it. Maciej