From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Tue Aug 2 18:12:14 2016 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (jgoerzen) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:12:14 -0700 Subject: dovecot-sieve plugin ABI mismatch with dovecot 2.2.5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Jon, There is now an updated CSWdovecot-sieve package in the testing catalog (dovecot_sieve-0.4.15,REV=2016.07.18) which is ABI compatible with the dovecot-2.2.25 package. Please update your dovecot_sieve package and your error should be resolved. I try to always release these two package together but that not always possible. In the future when an updated CSWdovecot package becomes available it's best to wait a few days until the CSWdovecot-sieve package appears in the catalog as well. Then update both packages together. Best regards, Jake On 07/25/2016 07:45 AM, J. Holland wrote: > Hi, > > I am no expert in this area, but I have recently update cswdovecot and > cswdovecot-sieve on Solaris 11.3. Previously, both were working fine. > > Now, 'doveconf -n' reports an ABI version mismatch: > > # 2.2.25 (f5ac02c): /etc/opt/csw/dovecot/dovecot.conf > doveconf: Error: Couldn't load plugin > /opt/csw/lib/64/dovecot/settings/libmanagesieve_login_settings.so: > Module is for different ABI version 2.2.ABIv24(2.2.24) (we have > 2.2.ABIv25(2.2.25)) > doveconf: Error: Couldn't load plugin > /opt/csw/lib/64/dovecot/settings/libmanagesieve_settings.so: Module is > for different ABI version 2.2.ABIv24(2.2.24) (we have 2.2.ABIv25(2.2.25)) > doveconf: Error: Couldn't load plugin > /opt/csw/lib/64/dovecot/settings/libpigeonhole_settings.so: Module is > for different ABI version 2.2.ABIv24(2.2.24) (we have 2.2.ABIv25(2.2.25)) > > Is anyone else seeing this? Can someone confirm if there is, in fact, > a problem with the current dovecot-sieve package? I tried contacting > the maintainer directly, but the CSW page gave some bogus error about > a non-existent captcha field not being filled in. > > Thanks! > Jon > From dam at opencsw.org Wed Aug 24 12:41:29 2016 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:41:29 +0200 Subject: Regarding your OpenCSW question Message-ID: <54D1A1FE-8376-4D72-B88A-539E9A956588@opencsw.org> Hi, regarding your question on IRC: [10:47pm] unixguy: I setup a local repository for opencsw. I also used the "bldcat" utility to build a catalog and I'm serving it via http. When attempting to install a package, I am getting this error: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil line 688. [10:48pm] unixguy: Does anyone know why? [10:48pm] unixguy: Here is the full output: [10:48pm] unixguy: root at sndcspmgt01:/opt/csw/etc# pkgutil -i CSWcoreutils Solving needed dependencies ... Solving dependency order ... Install 10 NEW packages: CSWcas-texinfo-1.42,REV=2010.11.26 (ualextra/opencsw)Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil line 688. [11:21pm] unixguy: I need to scram, but if you have a solution please email me: an0maly at runbox.com thanks for your time Take a look at the catalog and descriptions, I would assume there has been a problem with bldcat. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 841 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Aug 24 13:54:31 2016 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:54:31 +0200 Subject: Regarding your OpenCSW question In-Reply-To: <54D1A1FE-8376-4D72-B88A-539E9A956588@opencsw.org> References: <54D1A1FE-8376-4D72-B88A-539E9A956588@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Take a look at the catalog and descriptions, I would assume there > has been a problem with bldcat. Why was bldcat used in the first place? Looks like it's just a local mirror of our central repo, if you rsync it you will get our official catalog and don't have to build your own. If you have your own packages you want to make a catalog for you can use that in addition to the standard ones. /peter