From yvoinov at gmail.com  Wed Nov 29 22:55:14 2017
From: yvoinov at gmail.com (Yuri)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 03:55:14 +0600
Subject: GCC 5 updates
Message-ID: <d2004a2e-6271-b8fe-4247-3fe84fcf910c@gmail.com>

Hi gents.

The "Contact maintainer" seems not work (something wrong with capcha),
IRC not exists.

So, trying here. If anybody home.

AFAIK, GCC 5 seems updated:

http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

When we're can expect to be updated on repo?

Thanks,

Yuri

-- 
**************************
* C++: Bug to the future *
**************************


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 512 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171130/f6ab761e/attachment.asc>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Nov 30 16:54:26 2017
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:26 +0000
Subject: GCC 5 updates
In-Reply-To: <d2004a2e-6271-b8fe-4247-3fe84fcf910c@gmail.com>
References: <d2004a2e-6271-b8fe-4247-3fe84fcf910c@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-4ggkjy-sgYpK1q3a_Sg=RppX_xu3o9VpxSBY10kV=ZhA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Yuri,

I don't have much good news, unfortunately. I see that the
http://opencsw.org/p/gcc5core is maintained by Dagobert, who is active in
the project, but he's also a maintainer of 1600+ packages. The short answer
is that GCC 5 might not be updated in the repo for a long time, if at all.
The longer answer: if you care about GCC 5.5 being built, your main options
are doing it yourself, or paying somebody to do that for you. We have a
packaging tutorial [2] which walks you through all the steps of the
process. GCC is unfortunately not easy to work with, it was one of the
harder builds that I had experience with. If you run into any problems with
building, fire away, we'll try to help.

Maciej

[1] http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/
[2] https://www.opencsw.org/2012/12/gar-setup-and-packaging-tutorial/

Yuri via users <users at lists.opencsw.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 29/11/2017
?s 21:55:

> Hi gents.
>
> The "Contact maintainer" seems not work (something wrong with capcha),
> IRC not exists.
>
> So, trying here. If anybody home.
>
> AFAIK, GCC 5 seems updated:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
>
> When we're can expect to be updated on repo?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yuri
>
> --
> **************************
> * C++: Bug to the future *
> **************************
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171130/19c415b9/attachment.html>

From yvoinov at gmail.com  Thu Nov 30 17:22:14 2017
From: yvoinov at gmail.com (Yuri)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:22:14 +0600
Subject: GCC 5 updates
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-4ggkjy-sgYpK1q3a_Sg=RppX_xu3o9VpxSBY10kV=ZhA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d2004a2e-6271-b8fe-4247-3fe84fcf910c@gmail.com>
 <CALtRa-4ggkjy-sgYpK1q3a_Sg=RppX_xu3o9VpxSBY10kV=ZhA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1557e582-ab50-f693-61ca-48977523941f@gmail.com>

Hi Maciej,

no, absolutely no problem to build compiler from sources. I've already
be forced built GCC 5.4 from myself year ago. GCC is relatively easy to
build. Just will take much time.

However, Im manage several servers, and building GCC takes at least some
hours per server... This takes so much my time. This is why I'm asking.

Yes, I know I can make package myself and than distribute, however this
also takes time and, moreover, servers has different architecture. (The
question: Why I'm forced to deploy my own personal copy of OpenCSW if I
only would like to get fresh packages? ;) A rhetorical question :) )

Anyway, thank you. As usual - "If you woluld have most fresh critical
software - do it yourself from sources, because of all repos are rancid" :-!

I understand :)

Thanks,

Yuri.

30.11.2017 21:54, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski ?????:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> I don't have much good news, unfortunately. I see that the
> http://opencsw.org/p/gcc5core?is maintained by Dagobert, who is active
> in the project, but he's also a maintainer of 1600+ packages. The
> short answer is that GCC 5 might not be updated in the repo for a long
> time, if at all. The longer answer: if you care about GCC 5.5 being
> built, your main options are doing it yourself, or paying somebody to
> do that for you. We have a packaging tutorial [2] which walks you
> through all the steps of the process. GCC is unfortunately not easy to
> work with, it was one of the harder builds that I had experience with.
> If you run into any problems with building, fire away, we'll try to help.
>
> Maciej
>
> [1]?http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/
> [2]?https://www.opencsw.org/2012/12/gar-setup-and-packaging-tutorial/
>
> Yuri via users <users at lists.opencsw.org
> <mailto:users at lists.opencsw.org>> escreveu no dia quarta, 29/11/2017
> ?s 21:55:
>
>     Hi gents.
>
>     The "Contact maintainer" seems not work (something wrong with capcha),
>     IRC not exists.
>
>     So, trying here. If anybody home.
>
>     AFAIK, GCC 5 seems updated:
>
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
>
>     When we're can expect to be updated on repo?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Yuri
>
>     --
>     **************************
>     * C++: Bug to the future *
>     **************************
>
>

-- 
"Some people, when confronted with a problem, think ?I know, I'll use regular expressions.? Now they have two problems."
--Jamie Zawinsk

**************************
* C++: Bug to the future *
**************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171130/a422fc31/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 512 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171130/a422fc31/attachment.asc>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Nov 30 18:05:26 2017
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:05:26 +0000
Subject: GCC 5 updates
In-Reply-To: <1557e582-ab50-f693-61ca-48977523941f@gmail.com>
References: <d2004a2e-6271-b8fe-4247-3fe84fcf910c@gmail.com>
 <CALtRa-4ggkjy-sgYpK1q3a_Sg=RppX_xu3o9VpxSBY10kV=ZhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1557e582-ab50-f693-61ca-48977523941f@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-7kmueRKVFCEq305C=-OSx1gVmUHVRynDtOvjv+j_BCeQ@mail.gmail.com>

Ideally you would submit a patch to OpenCSW build recipe, then one of the
maintainers would run it on the buildfarm, and put it in the catalog.

Sometimes the updates are as simple as this one:
http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2015-June/010074.html

"If you would have most fresh critical software - do it yourself from
sources, because of all repos are rancid" -- yes! And then submit your
build to the repo. :) That's what used to do back in the day when I was
working with Solaris.

Maciej

Yuri <yvoinov at gmail.com> escreveu no dia quinta, 30/11/2017 ?s 16:22:

> Hi Maciej,
>
> no, absolutely no problem to build compiler from sources. I've already be
> forced built GCC 5.4 from myself year ago. GCC is relatively easy to build.
> Just will take much time.
>
> However, Im manage several servers, and building GCC takes at least some
> hours per server... This takes so much my time. This is why I'm asking.
>
> Yes, I know I can make package myself and than distribute, however this
> also takes time and, moreover, servers has different architecture. (The
> question: Why I'm forced to deploy my own personal copy of OpenCSW if I
> only would like to get fresh packages? ;) A rhetorical question :) )
>
> Anyway, thank you. As usual - "If you woluld have most fresh critical
> software - do it yourself from sources, because of all repos are rancid"
> :-!
> I understand :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yuri.
>
> 30.11.2017 21:54, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski ?????:
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> I don't have much good news, unfortunately. I see that the
> http://opencsw.org/p/gcc5core is maintained by Dagobert, who is active in
> the project, but he's also a maintainer of 1600+ packages. The short answer
> is that GCC 5 might not be updated in the repo for a long time, if at all.
> The longer answer: if you care about GCC 5.5 being built, your main options
> are doing it yourself, or paying somebody to do that for you. We have a
> packaging tutorial [2] which walks you through all the steps of the
> process. GCC is unfortunately not easy to work with, it was one of the
> harder builds that I had experience with. If you run into any problems with
> building, fire away, we'll try to help.
>
> Maciej
>
> [1] http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/
> [2] https://www.opencsw.org/2012/12/gar-setup-and-packaging-tutorial/
>
> Yuri via users <users at lists.opencsw.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
> 29/11/2017 ?s 21:55:
>
>> Hi gents.
>>
>> The "Contact maintainer" seems not work (something wrong with capcha),
>> IRC not exists.
>>
>> So, trying here. If anybody home.
>>
>> AFAIK, GCC 5 seems updated:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
>>
>> When we're can expect to be updated on repo?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yuri
>>
>> --
>> **************************
>> * C++: Bug to the future *
>> **************************
>>
>>
>>
> --
> "Some people, when confronted with a problem, think ?I know, I'll use regular expressions.? Now they have two problems."
> --Jamie Zawinsk
>
> **************************
> * C++: Bug to the future *
> **************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171130/fb09cf29/attachment-0001.html>