[csw-maintainers] /testing Some X11 proto updates
william at wbonnet.net
Sun Sep 27 22:11:37 CEST 2009
> Simply as a way to group them via a common prefix. But honestly, i don't
> mind having a shorter one either.
> We will hit the 20 chars limit with x11proto_ and that in turn will drag
> a whole other discussion with it. One that we need to have some time,
> but maybe not this time.
So do we agree that :
For proto packages
We add a x11_ prefix to all proto files
We keep the name of the package unchanged after the prefix
Proto packages that are not named like fooproto, are also unchanged and prefix by x11_
Devel suffix will not be used for these files (even if the contains the same kind of files as _devel packages)
Example : fooproto -> x11_fooproto
xbarproto -> x11_xbarproto
muf -> x11_muf
We don't change anything
I have commited almost all the proto and libs that were pending on my side. I still have a few options to add to be consistent with Dago's modifications (i am thinking of some extra merge steps). But before doing it i have to release and thus rename a few proto packages.
http://www.sunwizard.net Le site français des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group
More information about the maintainers