[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...)
bwalton at opencsw.org
Fri Jun 3 18:52:16 CEST 2011
Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jun 03 11:46:30 -0400 2011:
> A slight adjustment, since Dagobert just posted on the maintainers
> list that he changed his position on the issue(and he suggested that
> we proceed that way without voting):
> Will you now act in the way you seem to think I should act, and change
> *your* position?
Fine. It's not worth a vote over something so dumb. I think that
filename grouping is a bit more useful than searching the catalog, but
still not much, imo. Either way, I can see that I'm now the minority
> Or will you insist on having a vote?
No, I value the time of all involved and wouldn't waste it on
something like this.
> either way, it would be beneficial to see an official notice on how
> things will work.
> ie: a writeup by "the board", on how official votes are triggered.
Sure. Once I've cleared a few other things away I'll sit down and
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
More information about the pkgsubmissions