[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git, git_completion, git_cvs, git_dev(...)
phil at bolthole.com
Tue May 17 18:47:05 CEST 2011
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>Please feel free to put something forward. In the meantime, you have
> no reason to block packages based on your personal preferences.
In the absence of specific policy covering an area, it is a release
manager's role (in ANY organization) to exercise their best judgement
on whether something is good or not.
That is the whole point of having a human, vs an automated machine in
I am taking a stand on this, not merely as a "preference" issue, but
because I believe it is the best, most consistent thing for us to be
(Note: "preference" comes into play, when there is no technical
argument one way or the other.
In this case, there is a technical argument to be followed)
FYI, to tie loose ends together in this archive; since you declined to
start a vote off, I have started a discussion about stub naming on the
maintainer list .
More information about the pkgsubmissions