[REQUEST] ruby20 / augeas on buildfarm

[Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński via buildfarm]

Yes, I think it's okay, if for a short time. Notifying users is a good
thing, people will refrain from updating for a few days.

In similar cases I used to test my intermediate builds on a private build
host. I would build the ruby20 package, install it there (without
releasing) and work on the dependent packages. Once I got them to build, I
would repeat the process on the buildfarm.

Maciej

A dom, 9/11/2014, 22:44, Toni Schmidbauer via buildfarm <
buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org> escreveu:

> thanks for the hint, i've now uploaded the ruby20 and augeas packages.
>
> one more question about the augeas package:
>
> the updated package will for sure break the current ruby-augeas module.
> so after uploading version 1.2.0 to unstable augeas will no longer work
> from within puppet. but i plan to update puppet3 asap...
>
> should i send an email about this fact to the users ml? or is this ok,
> as it's called unstable...
>
> thanks
> toni
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20141109/ad7719a3/attachment.html>