[csw-maintainers] git in testing
Philip Brown
phil at bolthole.com
Fri Dec 19 00:26:39 CET 2008
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:17:24AM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> > Packages sometimes do not get accepted for release, because they
> > SHOULD NOT BE released. This created a large amount of problems
> > with certain packages last month.
>
> The output of Hudson is one step before testing. There is no
> damage using Hudson.
So, you are sayin that adding broken packages "in hudson", has zero
possiblility to corrupt other packages "in hudson" then?
BTW: It might be nice to have a beginner-level description of
"this is hudson, what it does, and roughly how it works" page in the wiki
or something, to help explain this stuff...?
More information about the maintainers
mailing list