[csw-maintainers] git in testing

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Phil,

Am 18.12.2008 um 23:22 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:13:41PM +0100, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> I think you should add them to Hudson even if they're not accepted  
>> yet.
>
> This would be a very bad precedent. Conceptually, I would think it  
> would be
> as bad as installing packages on the build machines that have not been
> accepted for release.

Definitely not. It should be in Hudson when the directory
is created. Having Hudson run jobs makes it easier to
concentrate e. g. on sparc and let Hudson do x86.

> Packages sometimes do not get accepted for release, because they
> SHOULD NOT BE released. This created a large amount of problems
> with certain packages last month.

The output of Hudson is one step before testing. There is no
damage using Hudson.


Best regards

   -- Dago