[csw-maintainers] Contents of devel@ list

[Philip Brown]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 05:58:27PM +0100, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> 
> Know if it was only because of a upstream change or a packaging bug 
> would be nice to know.


Well, that was ONE "nice" thing about the "REV=xxxx" field being optional
except for secondary release of the same version :-}

If there was no REV field, you could be fairly sure it was a simple
upstream update.


>  From a PR perspective it will show more precisely what we're doing, but 
> that you can also read from an atom feed.

I think it could be nice to support as some kind of optional thing.