[csw-maintainers] One more topic for "Communication"
Peter FELECAN
pfelecan at opencsw.org
Fri Feb 6 12:31:42 CET 2009
Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am 06.02.2009 um 12:03 schrieb William Bonnet:
>> Hi Peter
>>> And to complete the muppetish (viz. Statler and Waldorf) profile:
>>> -1 for php based forums.
>>>
>>
>> Including Java based forums ? ;)
>>
>> Is there some specific reasons for this ?
>
> It is not important what we (=the maintainers) want, but what the
> users want - it is the users forum. The users@ mailing list has
> failed, so let's try all of the other stuff and see what gets
> accepted and discard the rest. If the users want NNTP, fine,
> if they want RSS, fine, if they want a crappy PHP forum, yes,
> that is fine also. The one important thing is that it is actually
> *used*.
You're right. However, I don't understand the basis of the affirmation:
"The users@ mailing list has failed". For the moment we have the users
mailing list, as the sole vector, and maybe it would be a good thing to
ask there what the users want. It is possible that the perception of
this failure is due to the lack of users?
--
Peter
More information about the maintainers
mailing list