[csw-maintainers] Creation of users and groups added to cswclassutils

[Peter Bonivart]

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> "clearer" is better than "shorter".
> for something that users/admins only have to type around once, I think that
> adding some more letters is much preferred :-)
>
>  cswaddusersandgroups
>  cswaddusergroups
>  cswusergroups
>  cswusergroup
>
> something with "users" and/or "groups" spelled out would be nice.

Not cswusrgrp then? :-)

> To look at it from the flip side; if someone were looking at an uncommented
> csw.conf, and saw
>
> "remove_ug=no"
>
> they MIGHT guess that means "remove users and groups". or they might not.
> Best to remove ambiguity.

Not following you here...is this about the ug being confusing or if no
really means no?

We also have "use_smf=no", would someone be able to interpret that as
if SMF will be used? I don't think we have to worry about those guys,
they surely use Windows anyway. :-)

-- 
/peter