[csw-maintainers] test sqlite, subversion, python, trac, mod_wsgi: pysqlite2 missing, mercurial maybe missing
Mike Watters
mwatters at opencsw.org
Sun Mar 15 17:28:45 CET 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike Watters wrote:
> Mike Watters wrote:
>> rupert THURNER wrote:
>>> i tested the versions on testing by upgrading our trac installation.
>>> the following happened:
>>> * pysqlite2 does not match the sqlite version any more
>>> therefor trac does not run
What version of of sqlite3 are you running? pysqlite2 was compiled against
It appears trac does not have a direct requirement for sqlite?
$ pkginfo -l CSWsqlite3
PKGINST: CSWsqlite3
NAME: sqlite3 - An embeddable SQL engine in a C library
CATEGORY: application
ARCH: sparc
VERSION: 3.2.2,REV=2005.07.10
VENDOR: http://www.sqlite.org/ packaged for CSW by Michael Gernoth
PSTAMP: hastur20050710203124
INSTDATE: Dec 03 2008 22:49
HOTLINE: http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
EMAIL: michael at opencsw.org
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 21 installed pathnames
6 shared pathnames
3 directories
7 executables
5695 blocks used (approx)
>> I will fix the pysqlite2 package, the "old library" didn't get included for some reason, I will fix that.
>
>>> * python eggs needed to be reinstalled with easy_install.
>>> they were in lib/python, now they are in lib/python2.6
>>> (but i guess this should not be a real problem ...
>>> even if it would be nice to know why it happens)
>> prefix/lib/python is a non-standard location for python installs. I packaged it up standard.
>> the "new version" should allow for eggs in prefix/lib/python. During the packaging,
>> I "patched" site.py ( the extension that tells python where all the eggs are ) to search the as follows:
>
>> lib/python2.6/site-packages:lib/python/site-packages:lib/python2.5/site-python:\
>> lib/python2.3/site-python:lib/python2.1/site-python:lib/python/site-python
>
>> are your eggs in /usr/lib/python or ...python/site-packages?
> gerrr... are your eggs in prefix/lib/python or ...python/site-packages?
>>> * subversion seems to work basically (did not test interfaces, like
>>> java, ruby, ..)
>>> * mod_wsgi worked with mercurial (did not use
>>> the opencsw mercurial though ...)
>>> ad mercurial: would it make sense to package a mercurial.wsgi script
>>> as well? if yes, where would one put it? its basically a 5 line thing
>>> created by looking at
>>> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/modwsgi.
>> I am not familiar with mercurial, but normally you would add it to the mercurial
>> package as mercurial.wsgi.CSW and put it in the proper location within the package.
>> leaving it disabled in the config.
>
>>> rupert.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> maintainers mailing list
>>> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
>> please submit bug reports for these issues.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
- --
Thanks,
Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction."
* Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
US German-born Theoretical Physicist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEUEARECAAYFAkm9LL0ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcCnQCYrOsqA3n9TyC6Xmfrs2ONBvuZ
hwCdFrC0RSK5nPKNSI/pDAZNl5hA6I4=
=XIbv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the maintainers
mailing list