[csw-maintainers] Which packages are in GAR?

[rupert THURNER]

i kind of test-copied some of the contents to the trac wiki
https://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/gar, to check the conversion effort.

in the "ideal world" i would like to see one timeline about ticket
changes, and checkins, or checkins influencing tickets automatically
with something like
http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/contrib/trac-post-commit-hook.

what i was also wondering who is administrator of this trac, to chekc
if one coudl install/enable some plugins to really give it a try?

rupert.


On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 23:11, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> William Bonnet schrieb:
>>> Nice, is it updated automatically?
>> Yes it is
>
> How often? :)
>
>>> Is there a breakdown by maintainer so
>>> that everyone can check whether his packages in GAR are already
>>> correctly
>>> picked up by these statistics?
>>>
>> Soon :)
>> I work on a more complete version. I choosed to released it soon, so you
>> have a first list of the package to move.
>
> Yep, that's good. Thank you for working on it.
>
>> Then i'll add more information, including packages owned by retired
>> maintainers.
>>> What do you think about sending an email to each maintainer asking to
>>> move
>>> their builds to GAR in case they haven't done so already (including some
>>> pointers/links to help them get started)?
>> Sure, but first we need more documentation on GAR. Same for uwatch...
>
> Anyone working on the GAR docs right now? If not and you guys don't mind i
> would revamp the Wiki a bit so that is easier for GAR beginners to find
> the information they are looking for.
>
> Specifically i though about two things: 1) Reordering stuff on the main
> page and adding some descriptions so that you better know what a topic is
> about. 2) Adding a _brief_ quickstart HOWTO for using GAR (reusing some
> info from the Tutorial).
>
>>> I guess not everyone is reading
>>> here on a regular basis (and thus is aware that builds should be moved
>>> to
>>> GAR).
>>>
>> It is good idea. Do you think guys i should send it soon ? (let say this
>> week end, time to fix a few things in my script)
>
> I don't think everything needs to be 100% perfect. When people start
> working with GAR now they can easily pick up improvements in upstream
> watch et al. later.
>
> Sebastian
>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>