[csw-maintainers] stable release?

James Lee james at opencsw.org
Thu Oct 15 18:42:32 CEST 2009


On 15/10/09, 17:29:29, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote regarding Re:
[csw-maintainers] stable release?:

> > One thing I'd suggest is to only aim for 2 stable releases per year.
> > More than that and too much time is spent in freeze states, I think.
> >

> i agree. not to mention there's less burnout, etc.

Not necessarily, anything changed gets more rigourous test, (no change
plus no depend change means no test is needed), the longer you leave
it the more there is.  It also get increasingly hard to stop-gap carry
over.  We are facing this now, eg, if BDB screws it's not practical to
carry stuff over from 18 months - it needs fixing.



James.



More information about the maintainers mailing list