[csw-maintainers] CSWX packages

[Philip Brown]

On 12/22/10, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> About a year ago, we discussed replacing SUNW package functionality
> with our own, possibly using CSWX as a prefix.

that would be bad. we should stick to "CSW" exclusively.


> Should we use CSWXexim?  Would pkgutil, pkg-get and the catalog tools
> play nicely with this?  What about naming it CSWsunw-exim and then
> only including it in a special catalog?

Side catalog is fine.
OR... include replacement functionality  natively in exim, and allow
replacement of local binaries via csw.conf. With default to "no".




> I see the MTA packages and things like cups using this to replace
> system functionality...is there enough merit outside of these few
> packages to actually spend time on this?


Oooo, two birds with one stone. or in this case, two questions with one answer.


"default=no"

;-)