[csw-maintainers] Why are packages named in a "creative", non-consistent way?

[Philip Brown]

On Monday, June 7, 2010, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> I'm talking about the sparconly tag on these...


that's something we've actually done for a very long time, when only
one arch of a package got an update for purely packaging reasons.

as far as . vs _ in that trailing position   ... didn't think anyone cared much