[csw-maintainers] Why are packages named in a "creative", non-consistent way?

[Peter Bonivart]

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> On Monday, June 7, 2010, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> I'm talking about the sparconly tag on these...
>
>
> that's something we've actually done for a very long time, when only
> one arch of a package got an update for purely packaging reasons.
>
> as far as . vs _ in that trailing position   ... didn't think anyone cared much

Neither of those arguments are very good.

-- 
/peter