[csw-maintainers] The minimal version of gnupg

Dagobert Michelsen dam at opencsw.org
Fri Oct 22 08:59:29 CEST 2010


Am 21.10.2010 um 18:31 schrieb Philip Brown:
> secondly: to avoid pulling in sasl, and openssl, is not fixed by
> package granularity. we'd have to create separate versions of openldap
> that did not use sasl. and I cant see putting together an openldap
> version without openssl, that doesnt make much sense.
> It makes more sense to trim the dependencies at the "gpg_minimal"  
> level.
> gpg is, in principle, a "local file operation only" utility, that got
> extended. if all you want is the "local file only" stuff, all those
> other libs are just useless junk.

Understood. What about having two versions gpg1 and gpg2 as it is
now or is just one version (the latest gpg2) sufficient?

Best regards

   -- Dago

More information about the maintainers mailing list